1
|
Lazzari G, Benevento I, Montagna A, D’Andrea B, De Marco G, Castaldo G, Bianculli A, Tucciariello R, Metallo V, Solazzo AP. Breast Cancer Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Up-Front to Chemotherapy: Is There a Worthwhile Benefit? A Preliminary Report. BREAST CANCER (DOVE MEDICAL PRESS) 2024; 16:359-367. [PMID: 39050764 PMCID: PMC11268516 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s471345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Purpose We administered a new breast cancer (BC) adjuvant therapy sequence that delivered postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) before chemotherapy (CT). Our aim was to assess the gain in time to start PORT and the G2-G3 acute-subacute toxicity rate of whole breast adjuvant hypofractionated radiotherapy (AH-RT) administered up-front to the third-generation adjuvant CT (A-CT) in high-risk nodal positive BC in a preliminary report at 2 years. Methods This retrospective study analysed the duration of treatment and safety of AH-RT administered up-front to A-CT in high-risk nodal positive BC patients (pts). Data on 45 pts treated between 2022-2023 were collected. All pts underwent the third-generation A-CT after AH-RT 15-5 fractions with or without a boost. Acute toxicity was scored according to CTCAE v5.0 for skin, pulmonary, and cardiac adverse events. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess significant prognosticators for skin/lung/heart acute toxicities in the AH-RT 5-15 fractions arms and CT (p < 0.005). Results A reduction in the time to PORT initiation and overall adjuvant treatment time was recorded. RT was initiated 5 median weeks after surgery, and A-CT was performed 9 median weeks after surgery. The median duration of the entire adjuvant treatment was 35 weeks after surgery. At 6 months mean follow-up, no significant differences in G2-G3 toxicity were noted between the different hypofractionated RT arms, irrespective of the CT schedules, irradiated volumes, or boost (SIB or sequential) in univariate and multivariate analyses. In the multivariate analysis, no significant effects in CT schedules and AH-RT 5-15 arms for skin/lung acute toxicities (p = 0.077 and p = 0.68; 0.67 and 0.87, respectively) were recorded. Conclusion As a new PORT approach in BC, AH-RT up-front to the third-generation A-CT appeared safe with a low acute toxicity profile, providing an advantage in shortening the time from surgery to PORT initiation and the overall adjuvant treatment time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grazia Lazzari
- Radiation Oncology Unit, IRCCS, CROB, Rionero in Vulture, PZ, Italy
| | - Ilaria Benevento
- Radiation Oncology Unit, IRCCS, CROB, Rionero in Vulture, PZ, Italy
| | | | - Barbara D’Andrea
- Radiation Oncology Unit, IRCCS, CROB, Rionero in Vulture, PZ, Italy
| | | | | | - Antonella Bianculli
- Physic Unit, Radiation Oncology Unit, IRCCS, CROB, Rionero in Vulture, PZ, Italy
| | | | - Vito Metallo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, IRCCS, CROB, Rionero in Vulture, PZ, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moen M, Holton T, Phung A, Badve S, Mylander C, Sanders T, Pauliukonis M, Jackson RS. Complications after Oncoplastic Breast Reduction and Impact on Time to Adjuvant Therapy. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2024; 12:e6010. [PMID: 39081812 PMCID: PMC11288615 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000006010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
Background Although lumpectomy with oncoplastic breast reduction (OBR) improves cosmetic results and ameliorates symptomatic macromastia, associated complications may delay adjuvant therapy. Methods This was a single-institution, retrospective study of OBRs (2015-2021). A major complication was defined as need for IV antibiotics, and/or operation under general anesthesia. Association of complications with delay to adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy, radiation) was assessed. Results In total, 282 patients were included. The major complication rate was 3.9%, and overall complication rate was 31.2%. The most common complication was incisional dehiscence (23.4%). Body mass index [BMI >35 (P < 0.0001)], diabetes (P = 0.02), and HgbA1c [>6.5 (P = 0.0002)] were significantly associated with having a major complication. The occurrence of any complication was associated with a delay in time to radiation (median 7 versus 8 weeks, P < 0.001). The occurrence of a major complication was associated with a more meaningful delay to radiation (median 7 versus 15 weeks, P = 0.002). Occurrence of any complication, or a major complication, was not associated with delay to chemotherapy. Conclusions The overall complication rate observed after OBR falls within the range reported in the literature. Patients with a BMI more than 35, diabetes, and/or HgbA1c more than 6.5 were at increased risk for a major complication, which was associated with a meaningful delay to radiation. Consideration may be given to partial mastectomy alone without oncoplastic reduction in patients with small tumors when the priority to avoid radiation delay is high (eg, high-risk tumors), or the risk of delay is high (eg, diabetic or BMI >35).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micaela Moen
- From Rebecca Fortney Breast Center, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Luminis Health, Annapolis, Md
| | - Tripp Holton
- From Rebecca Fortney Breast Center, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Luminis Health, Annapolis, Md
| | - Angelina Phung
- From Rebecca Fortney Breast Center, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Luminis Health, Annapolis, Md
| | - Shivani Badve
- From Rebecca Fortney Breast Center, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Luminis Health, Annapolis, Md
| | - Charles Mylander
- From Rebecca Fortney Breast Center, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Luminis Health, Annapolis, Md
| | - Thomas Sanders
- From Rebecca Fortney Breast Center, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Luminis Health, Annapolis, Md
| | - Margaret Pauliukonis
- From Rebecca Fortney Breast Center, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Luminis Health, Annapolis, Md
| | - Rubie Sue Jackson
- From Rebecca Fortney Breast Center, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Luminis Health, Annapolis, Md
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Benedict KC, Brown MI, Berry HA, Berry SM, O’Brien RC, Davis JM. Oncoplastic Breast Reduction: A Systematic Review of Postoperative Complications. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2023; 11:e5355. [PMID: 37850204 PMCID: PMC10578759 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
Background Breast-conserving therapy with oncoplastic reduction is a useful strategy for partial mastectomy defect reconstruction. The most recently published systematic review of oncoplastic breast reduction outcomes from 2015 showed wound dehiscence in 4.3%, hematoma in 0.9%, infection in 2.8%, and nipple necrosis in 0.9% of patients. We performed a systematic review of oncoplastic breast reduction literature, comparing outcomes and complication rates reported over the past 8 years. Methods Studies describing the use of oncoplastic breast reduction and discussion of postoperative complications were included. The primary outcome assessed was the postoperative complication rate; secondary outcomes analyzed were rates of margin expansion, completion mastectomy, and delays in adjuvant therapy due to complications. Results Nine articles met inclusion criteria, resulting in 1715 oncoplastic breast reduction patients. The mean rate of hematoma was 3%, nipple necrosis was 2%, dehiscence was 4%, infection was 3%, and seroma was 2%. The need for re-excision of margins occurred in 8% of patients, and completion mastectomy in 2%. Finally, delay in adjuvant treatment due to a postoperative complication occurred in 4% of patients. Conclusions Oncoplastic breast reduction is an excellent option for many patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy; however, postoperative complications can delay adjuvant radiation therapy. Results of this systematic literature review over the past 8 years showed a slight increase in complication rate compared to the most recent systematic review from 2015. With increased popularity and surgeon familiarity, oncoplastic breast reduction remains a viable option for reconstruction of partial mastectomy defects despite a slight increase in complication rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine C. Benedict
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Miss
| | - Madyson I. Brown
- School of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Miss
| | - Hunter A. Berry
- School of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Miss
| | - Scott M. Berry
- Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Miss
| | - Robert C. O’Brien
- Department of Data Science, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Miss
| | - Jared M. Davis
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Miss
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Loevezijn AA, Geluk CS, van den Berg MJ, van Werkhoven ED, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD, van Duijnhoven FH, Hoornweg MJ. Immediate or delayed oncoplastic surgery after breast conserving surgery at the Netherlands Cancer Institute: a cohort study of 251 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 198:295-307. [PMID: 36690822 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06841-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Oncoplastic surgery (OPS) after breast conserving surgery is preferably performed during the same operation. Offering delayed OPS instead of mastectomy to patients with a high risk of tumor-positive margins allows breast conservation with the option of margin re-excision during OPS, without having to dismantle the reconstruction. We aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes after immediate and delayed OPS. METHODS We included early-stage breast cancer patients who underwent OPS at the Netherlands Cancer Institute between 2016 and 2019. Patients were selected for delayed OPS after multidisciplinary consultation if the risk of tumor-positive margins with immediate OPS was considered significant (> 30%). Groups were compared on baseline characteristics and short-term surgical outcomes. RESULTS Of 242 patients with 251 OPS, 130 (52%) OPS had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Immediate OPS was performed in 176 (70%) cases and delayed OPS in 76 (30%). Selection for delayed OPS was associated with tumor size (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.04), ILC (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.10-6.20), DCIS (OR 3.45, 95% CI 1.42-8.34) and bra size (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62-0.94). Delayed and immediate OPS differed in tissue weight (54 vs. 67 g, p = 0.034), tissue replacement (51% vs. 26%, p < .001) and tumor-positive margins (66% vs. 18%, p < .001). Re-excision was performed in 48 (63%) delayed OPS and in 11 (6%) immediate OPS. Groups did not differ in complications (21% vs. 18%, p = 0.333). Breast conservation after immediate and delayed OPS was 98% and 93%, respectively. CONCLUSION Performing delayed OPS in selected cases facilitated simultaneous margin re-excision without increasing complications, and resulted in an excellent breast conservation rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane A van Loevezijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charissa S Geluk
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke J van den Berg
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik D van Werkhoven
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederieke H van Duijnhoven
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marije J Hoornweg
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen SY, Sun GY, Tang Y, Jing H, Song YW, Jin J, Liu YP, Zhao XR, Song YC, Chen B, Qi SN, Tang Y, Lu NN, Li N, Fang H, Li YX, Wang SL. Timing of postmastectomy radiotherapy following adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk breast cancer: A post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Cancer 2022; 174:153-164. [PMID: 35998550 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.07.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the appropriate timing of radiotherapy (RT) after mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy for women with high-risk breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Post hoc analyses of 584 patients with stage II and III breast cancer from a randomised controlled clinical trial were performed. All patients underwent mastectomy followed by sequential chemotherapy and RT. The optimal cut-off values for the surgery-RT interval (SRI) and the chemotherapy-RT interval (CRI) for overall survival (OS) were determined using the hazard ratio for continuous predictors. The locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant metastasis (DM), disease-free survival (DFS), and OS rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 83.5 months. Median SRI and CRI were 168 and 27 days, respectively. An SRI of >210 days was independently associated with higher DM (HR 2.65, 95% CI: 1.49-4.71; HR 2.78, 95% CI 1.51-5.26), lower OS (HR 2.44, 95% CI: 1.28-4.54; HR 2.50, 95% CI: 1.41-4.35), and lower DFS (HR 2.57, 95% CI: 1.45-4.57; HR 2.70, 95% CI: 1.45-5.00) than SRI of <180 or 180-210 days. Furthermore, a CRI of more than 42 days was independently associated with higher DM (HR 1.89, 95% CI: 1.17-3.06; HR 1.96, 95% CI: 1.19-3.22), lower OS (HR 2.44, 95% CI: 1.41-4.35; HR 1.92, 95% CI: 1.10-3.33), and lower DFS (HR 1.84, 95% CI: 1.14-2.96; HR 1.82, 95% CI: 1.12-2.94) than a CRI of <28 or 28-42 days. However, SRI and CRI had no significant effect on LRR. CONCLUSIONS Based on the present findings, the timing of the initiation of RT both after mastectomy and after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy is crucial for patients with high-risk breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si-Ye Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Guang-Yi Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yu Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China; Department of Clinical Trials Center, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Hao Jing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yong-Wen Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Jing Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yue-Ping Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Xu-Ran Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yu-Chun Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Bo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Shu-Nan Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yuan Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Ning-Ning Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Ning Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Hui Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
| | - Ye-Xiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China; State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
| | - Shu-Lian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Taparra K, Dee EC, Dao D, Patel R, Santos P, Chino F. Disaggregation of Asian American and Pacific Islander Women With Stage 0-II Breast Cancer Unmasks Disparities in Survival and Surgery-to-Radiation Intervals: A National Cancer Database Analysis From 2004 to 2017. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1255-e1264. [PMID: 35594493 PMCID: PMC9377694 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Aggregation of Asian Americans (AAs) with Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders (NHPIs) masks significant health disparities. We evaluated overall survival (OS) and surgery-to-radiation intervals (STRIs) among AA and NHPI women with early-stage breast cancer. METHODS This National Cancer Database study included women with stage 0-II breast cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2017. STRI was defined as days from surgery to radiation. Patients were stratified by adjuvant treatment. AAs were disaggregated into geographically relevant subpopulations: East, South, and Southeast Asians. Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank tests assessed survival. Cox proportional hazard and linear regression were adjusted for clinical and sociodemographic factors. RESULTS In total, 578,927 women were included (median age 61 years, median follow-up 65 months, and 10-year OS 83%). AA and NHPI 10-year OS was 91% overall; subpopulation 10-year OS was 92% for East Asian, 90% for South Asian, 90% for Southeast Asian, and 83% for NHPI. On multivariable analysis, compared with non-Hispanic White, NHPI women had worse survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.38; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.77); all AA subpopulations had improved survival: East Asian (aHR = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.69), South Asian (aHR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.84), and Southeast Asian (aHR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.94). The AA and NHPI median STRI for was 73 days overall; the disaggregated median STRI was 68 days for East Asian, 80 days for South Asian, 77 days for Southeast Asians, and 81 days for NHPI. On adjusted analysis, compared with non-Hispanic White, Southeast Asians and NHPI had longer STRI by 6.6 (95% CI, 4.3 to 8.9) and 10.0 (95% CI, 5.8 to 14) days, respectively. CONCLUSION Breast cancer disparities exist among disaggregated AA and NHPI subpopulations. Data disaggregation insights may lead to interventions to overcome these disparities, such as optimizing time-to-treatment for select populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kekoa Taparra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | | | - Dyda Dao
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Rohan Patel
- Department of Internal Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY
| | - Patricia Santos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY
| | - Fumiko Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cao L, Xu C, Wang MD, Qi WX, Cai G, Cai R, Wang SB, Ou D, Li M, Shen KW, Chen JY. Influence of Adjuvant Radiotherapy Timing on Survival Outcomes in High-Risk Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Treatments. Front Oncol 2022; 12:905223. [PMID: 35912233 PMCID: PMC9334789 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.905223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PurposeTo determine the relationship between time to radiotherapy (TTR) and survival outcomes in breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant treatments (NATs).MethodsContinuous non-metastatic BC patients receiving NAT and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) from 2009 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. A multivariable Cox model with restricted cubic splines (RCSs) was used to determine the panoramic relationship between TTR and survival outcomes. Multivariable analysis was used to control for confounding factors between the groups of TTR.ResultsA total of 315 patients were included. The RCS modeling demonstrated a non-linear relationship between TTR and survival outcomes. The lowest risk for distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was observed at the TTR of 12 weeks, and the lowest risk of BC-specific survival (BCSS) at 10 weeks. TTR was accordingly transformed into categorical variables as ≤10, 11–20, and >20 weeks. Multivariable analysis revealed that the TTR of ≤10 weeks was an independent prognostic factor for worse DMFS (HR = 2.294, 95% CI 1.079–4.881) and RFS (HR = 2.126, 95% CI 1.038–4.356) compared with the TTR of 10–20 weeks, while the is no difference in DMFS, RFS, and BCSS between TTR >20 weeks and TTR of 10–20 weeks.ConclusionThere exists a non-linear relationship between TTR after surgery and survival outcomes in patients treated with NAT. Early initiation of RT following surgery does not seem to be associated with a better therapeutic outcome. A relatively flexible recommendation of TTR could be adopted in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Cheng Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Meng-Di Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei-Xiang Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Gang Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Rong Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shu-Bei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Dan Ou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Kun-Wei Shen
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jia-Yi Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Jia-Yi Chen,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gao W, Wang J, Yin S, Geng C, Xu B. An appropriate treatment interval does not affect the prognosis of patients with breast Cancer. HOLISTIC INTEGRATIVE ONCOLOGY 2022; 1:8. [PMID: 37520334 PMCID: PMC9255457 DOI: 10.1007/s44178-022-00010-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Major public health emergencies may lead to delays or alterations in the treatment of patients with breast cancer at each stage of diagnosis and treatment. How much do these delays and treatment changes affect treatment outcomes in patients with breast cancer? Methods This review summarized relevant research in the past three decades and identified the effect of delayed treatment on the prognosis of patients with breast cancer in terms of seeking medical treatment, neoadjuvant treatment, surgery, postoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapies. Results Delay in seeking medical help for ≥12 weeks affected the prognosis. Surgical treatment within 4 weeks of diagnosis did not affect patient prognosis. Starting neoadjuvant chemotherapy within 8 weeks after diagnosis, receiving surgical treatment at 8 weeks or less after the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and receiving radiotherapy 8 weeks after surgery did not affect patient prognosis. Delayed chemotherapy did not increase the risk of relapse in patients with luminal A breast cancer. Every 4 weeks of delay in the start of postoperative chemotherapy in patients with luminal B, triple-negative, or HER2-positive breast cancer treated with trastuzumab will adversely affect the prognosis. Targeted treatment delays in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer should not exceed 60 days after surgery or 4 months after diagnosis. Radiotherapy within 8 weeks after surgery did not increase the risk of recurrence in patients with early breast cancer who were not undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion Different treatments have different time sensitivities, and the careful evaluation and management of these delays will be helpful in minimizing the negative effects on patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Gao
- Department of Breast Cancer, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 169 East Tianshan Avenue, Shijiazhuang, 050035 Hebei China
| | - Jiaxing Wang
- Department of Breast Cancer, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 169 East Tianshan Avenue, Shijiazhuang, 050035 Hebei China
| | - Sifei Yin
- Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 USA
| | - Cuizhi Geng
- Department of Breast Cancer, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 169 East Tianshan Avenue, Shijiazhuang, 050035 Hebei China
| | - Binghe Xu
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Effect of radiotherapy sequence on long-term outcome in patients with node-positive breast cancer: a retrospective study. Sci Rep 2022; 12:10729. [PMID: 35750892 PMCID: PMC9232535 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14873-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The optimal sequence of chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) after surgery in breast cancer patients is unclear. There is a lack of literature on RT given between anthracycline and taxane administration. We evaluated the effect of RT sequence on long-term outcome in breast cancer. Two hundred patients who underwent surgery between January 2009 and December 2012 for node-positive breast cancers were evaluated retrospectively. All patients were treated with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by taxane. Sandwich RT group that received RT between AC and taxane was compared to the group that received RT after CT. The mean follow-up period was 105.4 months. The locoregional recurrence (LRR) rate was lower in sandwich RT group (P = 0.012) and there was no significant difference in distant metastasis between the two groups. The RT sequence was an important predictor for LRR in multivariable analysis (P = 0.017). For luminal A subtype, disease-free survival (DFS) was better in sandwich RT group than in CT followed by RT group (P = 0.001). The overall survival did not correlated with RT sequence regardless of subtype. Sandwich RT can offer DFS benefit in luminal A subtype breast cancer. A tailored approach of sequencing chemotherapy and radiotherapy would be needed considering the factors that can influence outcome.
Collapse
|
10
|
Xie Y, Zhang Y, Xie K, Zhong X, Zheng H, Gou Q. Impact of time to initiation of postoperative radiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the prognosis of breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study in China. Int J Cancer 2022; 151:730-738. [PMID: 35333401 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The optimal time to the initiation of postoperative radiotherapy (TTR) in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery is unclear. We explored the association between TTR and outcomes among breast cancer females to determine the optimal timing for radiotherapy. We included 1022 women with breast cancer who underwent NAC and surgery between 1997 and 2019. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the TTR: <8 weeks, 8-16 weeks, and > 16 weeks. We used Cox proportional hazards models and analyzed the hazard ratios (HRs) for breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) and all-cause mortality (ACM). The median TTR for the cohort was 97 days. Compared to patients with TTRs of 8-16 weeks, those with TTRs <8 weeks or > 16 weeks had an increased risk of BCSM (HR, 2.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-5.36 and HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.24-3.28, respectively) and ACM (HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.17-4.56 and HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.24-2.98, respectively) after adjusting for the confounders. Furthermore, at TTR of >16 weeks, each additional week of TTR was associated with a 3% increase in BCSM risk and 2% increase in ACM risk. Our findings suggest that patients who have undergone NAC and surgery show lower BCSM and ACM risks at TTR of 8-16 weeks compared with <8 weeks or > 16 weeks. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxin Xie
- Department of Medical Oncology of Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer, Clinical Research Center for Breast, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yingjie Zhang
- Department of radiation therapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Keqi Xie
- Departments of Anesthesiology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan, China
| | - Xiaorong Zhong
- Department of Medical Oncology of Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer, Clinical Research Center for Breast, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Hong Zheng
- Department of Medical Oncology of Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer, Clinical Research Center for Breast, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Qiheng Gou
- Department of Medical Oncology of Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Witmer TJK, Kouwenberg CAE, Bargon CA, de Leeuw DM, Koiter E, Siemerink EJM, Mureau MAM, Rakhorst HA. Comparing costs of standard Breast-Conserving Surgery to Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy with Immediate two-stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75:2569-2576. [PMID: 35398000 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.02.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conventional breast-conserving surgery (C-BCS) has equal oncological outcomes and superior cosmetic and patient-reported outcomes compared to mastectomy with immediate two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction (M-IBR). Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OP-BCS) is increasingly being used, as it often has better cosmetic results and it enables larger tumour resection. However, OP-BCS and M-IBR compared to C-BCS lengthens operative time and might lead to more complications and consequently to additional costs. Therefore, this study aimed to compare costs and complication rates of C-BCS, OP-BCS and M-IBR. METHODS This single-centre, retrospective cohort study, calculated costs for all patients who had undergone breast cancer surgery between January 2014 and December 2016. Patient-, tumour- and surgery-related data of C-BCS, OP-BCS and M-IBR patients were retrieved by medical record review. Treatment costs were calculated using hospital financial data. Differences in costs and complications were analysed. RESULTS A total of 220 patients were included: 74 patients in the C-BCS, 78 in the OP-BCS and 68 in the M-IBR group. From most expensive to least expensive, differences in total costs were found between C-BCS vs. OP-BCS and C-BCS vs. M-IBR (p=<0.01 and p=0.04, respectively). Costs of OP-BCS and M-IBR were comparable. Complication rates were 5.5% for C-BCS, followed by 17% for OP-BCS, and 34% for M-IBR (p<0.01). CONCLUSION Considering total treatment costs, OP-BCS was financially non-inferior to M-IBR, whereas complication rates were higher following M-IBR. Therefore, when considering other benefits of OP-BCS, such as higher patient-reported outcomes and similar oncological outcomes, a shift from M-IBR to BCS using oncoplastic techniques seems justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom J K Witmer
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Hengelo, The Netherlands.
| | - Casimir A E Kouwenberg
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Claudia A Bargon
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle M de Leeuw
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Hengelo, The Netherlands
| | - Eveline Koiter
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marc A M Mureau
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hinne A Rakhorst
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Hengelo, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jobsen JJ, Struikmans H, van der Palen J, Siemerink EJM. Clinical relevance of the timing of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery : Results of a large, single-centre, population-based cohort study. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 198:268-281. [PMID: 34845511 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01877-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the effect of the timing of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery in relation to distant metastasis-free survival and disease-specific survival. METHODS The analysis was performed in relation to 4189 women all undergoing breast-conserving therapy (BCT). Three groups were defined with respect to lymph node status and the use of adjuvant systemic therapy (AST). Patients were categorized into time intervals: < 37 days, 37-53 days, 54-112 days and > 112 days. RESULTS For women without lymph node metastases and with favourable characteristics aged > 55 years, an improved treatment efficacy was noted when starting radiotherapy with a time interval of < 37 days. The same was observed for women with lymph nodes metastases receiving AST aged ≤ 50 years. Finally, for women aged > 50 years with negative lymph node status but with unfavourable characteristics and receiving AST, an improved treatment efficacy was noted when starting radiotherapy after a time interval of ≥ 37 days. CONCLUSION The results of our study further support the hypothesis that the timing of radiotherapy may have an impact on treatment efficacy and that further studies (preferably randomized trials) are indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan J Jobsen
- Department of Epidemiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Koningstraat 1, 7512 KZ, Enschede, The Netherlands.
- Breast Clinic Oost-Nederland, ZGT, Hengelo, The Netherlands.
| | - Henk Struikmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Job van der Palen
- Department of Epidemiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Koningstraat 1, 7512 KZ, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Departement of Research Methodology, Measurement, and Data Analysis, Faculty of Behavioural Science, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ma X, Chen J, Ma D, Jiang Y, Liu Z, Chen S, Zhang Y, Shen Y, Yu X, Yang Z, Li S, Mo M, Qian Y, Liu G, Wu J, Shao Z, Yu K, Di G. Delayed initiation of radiation therapy is associated with inferior outcomes for breast cancer patients with hormone receptor-negative tumors after breast-conserving surgery. Gland Surg 2021; 10:2631-2643. [PMID: 34733713 DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background To investigate whether the interval between adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) completion and postoperative radiation therapy initiation (ICR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) affects ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) or survival. Methods All women who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and underwent BCS between 2005 and 2014 were included. In total, 1,472 patients underwent adjuvant CT followed by postoperative radiation therapy (RT) (CT+), whereas 402 patients received postoperative RT alone (CT-). Analyses were stratified by ICR and the interval between surgery and the initiation of postoperative RT (ISR) in these two cohorts. The cutoff points for treatment delay were 47 days in the CT+ cohort and 69 days in the CT- cohort. IBTR, local-regional failure (LRF), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed through Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine the prognostic factors of survival outcomes. Results The median follow-up duration was 56 months. There was an association between a delay in ICR and an increase in IBTR in the CT+ group (P=0.014 for intervals ≤47 vs. >47 days). This association was confirmed by multivariate analyses [hazard ratio (HR) of 2.766; P=0.046] in the hormone receptor-negative subgroup. The 5-year cumulative incidence rates of IBTR were 1.3% and 3.3% (≤47 vs. >47 days, respectively) in the CT+ cohort. For patients in the CT- cohort, a longer delay of initiation of postoperative RT (≤69 vs. >69 days) significantly decreased DFS (HR of 6.430; P=0.002). The 5-year cumulative incidence rates of disease recurrence were 3.0% for RT starting ≤69 days after surgery and 12.6% for RT starting >69 days after surgery. Conclusions A high IBTR rate was related to an ICR beyond 47 days. Delay of RT after CT or surgery among patients who undergo BCS should be avoided, especially among patients in the hormone receptor-negative subgroup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyan Ma
- Department of Breast Surgery, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, First People's Hospital of Taicang, Taicang, China
| | - Ding Ma
- Department of Breast Surgery, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yizhou Jiang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhebin Liu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sheng Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yizhou Shen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoli Yu
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhaozhi Yang
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuang Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, Liaoning Province Cancer Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Miao Mo
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Cancer Prevention, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongxiang Qian
- Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, First People's Hospital of Taicang, Taicang, China
| | - Guangyu Liu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiong Wu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiming Shao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Keda Yu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Genhong Di
- Department of Breast Surgery, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rodin D, Rakovitch E. Managing the Minefields in Optimal Treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:943-944. [PMID: 34171248 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Rodin
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eileen Rakovitch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
You KY, Zou WL, Ding L, Bi ZF, Yao HR. Large Tumor Size is an Indicator for the Timely Administration of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer with Positive Lymph Node. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:1325-1332. [PMID: 33603478 PMCID: PMC7884945 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s293470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The optimum timing of adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer patients who had undergone surgery remains unclear. The present study aimed to identify the clinical factors which could assist the selecting of time interval (TI) between surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in luminal breast cancer with lymph node metastasis. Patients and Methods This retrospective study included 1054 luminal breast cancer patients with lymph node metastasis, diagnosed between May 2004 and December 2014, and treated with surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between patients in the short and long TI groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to examine clinical factors associated with DFS. Subgroups analysis was further performed based on the significant predictors of DFS to explore the association of TI and tumor prognosis. Results For the whole group of patients, there was no difference in OS and DFS between patients with long and short TI. Multivariate analysis showed that age, N stage and tumor size were significant predictors of DFS. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that neither age nor N stage were informative in TI selection; in contrast, in patients with large tumors, a short TI was associated with better DFS than a long TI. In patients with small tumors, there was no significant association between TI and tumor prognosis. In the multivariable analysis, TI was independent predictor of DFS and local recurrence-free survival in patients with large tumors. Conclusion Large tumor size is an indicator for the timely administration of adjuvant radiotherapy in luminal breast cancer with positive lymph node.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-Yun You
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,RNA Biomedical Institute, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei-Liang Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Lin Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhuo-Fei Bi
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,RNA Biomedical Institute, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - He-Rui Yao
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,RNA Biomedical Institute, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cao L, Xu C, Cai G, Qi WX, Cai R, Wang SB, Ou D, Li M, Shen KW, Chen JY. How Does the Interval Between Completion of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Initiation of Radiotherapy Impact Clinical Outcomes in Operable Breast Cancer Patients? Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:2155-2168. [PMID: 32974696 PMCID: PMC7514228 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09026-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of time to radiotherapy (TTR) after completion of chemotherapy (CT), and TTR after surgery, in breast cancer (BC) patients. Patients and Methods Continuous breast cancer patients treated with surgery and CT followed by radiotherapy (RT) from 2009 through 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into four groups with respect to TTR after CT, i.e. <4, 4–8, 8–12, and >12 weeks, and TTR after surgery, i.e. <147, 147–180, 180–202, and >202 days. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the independent effect of TTRs. Results Overall, 989 patients were enrolled. Patients with a TTR of >12 weeks after CT showed significantly worse breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) compared with those who had a TTR of <4 weeks (BCSS: hazard ratio [HR] 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1–0.76; OS: HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13–0.88), 4–8 weeks (BCSS: HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08–0.66; OS: HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11–0.8), and 8–12 weeks (BCSS: HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.05–0.96; OS: HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06–0.99). TTR after surgery showed no significant association with survival outcomes in the entire cohort, except in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive disease and those receiving mastectomy. In HR-positive tumors, a TTR after CT of >12 weeks remained an independent predictor for adverse BCSS and OS. Conclusion Initiation of RT beyond 12 weeks after CT might compromise survival outcomes. Efforts should be made to avoid delaying RT, especially after completion of CT and in patients with HR-positive tumors, positive lymph nodes, and those receiving mastectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Cheng Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Gang Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei-Xiang Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Rong Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shu-Bei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Dan Ou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Kun-Wei Shen
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jia-Yi Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Strnad V, Krug D, Sedlmayer F, Piroth MD, Budach W, Baumann R, Feyer P, Duma MN, Haase W, Harms W, Hehr T, Fietkau R, Dunst J, Sauer R. DEGRO practical guideline for partial-breast irradiation. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 196:749-763. [PMID: 32350554 PMCID: PMC7449998 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01613-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This consensus statement from the Breast Cancer Working Group of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) aims to define practical guidelines for accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI). METHODS Recent recommendations for relevant aspects of APBI were summarized and a panel of experts reviewed all the relevant literature. Panel members of the DEGRO experts participated in a series of conferences, supplemented their clinical experience, performed a literature review, and formulated recommendations for implementing APBI in clinical routine, focusing on patient selection, target definition, and treatment technique. RESULTS Appropriate patient selection, target definition for different APBI techniques, and basic rules for appropriate APBI techniques for clinical routine outside of clinical trials are described. Detailed recommendations for APBI in daily practice, including dose constraints, are given. CONCLUSION Guidelines are mandatory to assure optimal results of APBI using different techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Strnad
- University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - D Krug
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - F Sedlmayer
- Paracelsus Medical University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - M D Piroth
- Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - W Budach
- Heinrich-Heine-University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - R Baumann
- St. Marien-Krankenhaus Siegen, Siegen, Germany
| | - P Feyer
- Vivantes Hospital Neukoelln, Berlin, Germany
| | - M N Duma
- University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - W Haase
- St.-Vincentius-Hospital Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - W Harms
- St. Claraspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - T Hehr
- Marienhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - R Fietkau
- University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - J Dunst
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - R Sauer
- University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Curigliano G, Cardoso MJ, Poortmans P, Gentilini O, Pravettoni G, Mazzocco K, Houssami N, Pagani O, Senkus E, Cardoso F. Recommendations for triage, prioritization and treatment of breast cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Breast 2020; 52:8-16. [PMID: 32334323 PMCID: PMC7162626 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 155] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) associated disease (COVID-19) outbreak seriously challenges globally all health care systems and professionals. Expert projections estimate that despite social distancing and lockdown being practiced, we have yet to feel the full impact of COVID-19. In this manuscript we provide guidance to prepare for the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer patients and advise on how to triage, prioritize and organize diagnostic procedures, surgical, radiation and medical treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Curigliano
- Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Department of Early Drug Development, Italy; University of Milano, Milano, Italy.
| | - Maria Joao Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, Portugal; Nova Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Iridium Kankernetwerk, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Oreste Gentilini
- Breast Surgery, San Raffaele University and Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Department of Early Drug Development, Italy; University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Ketti Mazzocco
- Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Department of Early Drug Development, Italy; University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Nehmat Houssami
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Olivia Pagani
- Service Interdisciplinaire de Cancérologie, Hopital Riviera-Chablais, Rennaz, Vaud, Geneva University Hospitals, Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Switzerland
| | | | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Heeg E, Marang-van de Mheen PJ, Van Maaren MC, Schreuder K, Tollenaar RAEM, Siesling S, Bos MEMM, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD. Association between initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy beyond 30 days after surgery and overall survival among patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2020; 147:152-159. [PMID: 31721193 PMCID: PMC7317578 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Delayed time to chemotherapy (TTC) is associated with decreased outcomes of breast cancer patients. Recently, studies suggested that the association might be subtype‐dependent and that TTC within 30 days should be warranted in patients with triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC). The aim of the current study is to determine if TTC beyond 30 days is associated with reduced 10‐year overall survival in TNBC patients. We identified all TNBC patients diagnosed between 2006 and 2014 who received adjuvant chemotherapy in the Netherlands. We distinguished between breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) vs. mastectomy given the difference in preoperative characteristics and outcomes. The association was estimated with hazard ratios (HRs) using propensity‐score matched Cox proportional hazard analyses. In total, 3,016 patients were included. In matched patients who underwent BCS (n = 904), 10‐year overall survival was favorable for patients with TTC within 30 days (84.4% vs. 76.9%, p = 0.001). Patients with TTC beyond 30 days were more likely than those with TTC within 30 days to die within 10 years after surgery (HR 1.69 (95% CI 1.22–2.34), p = 0.002). In matched patients who underwent mastectomy (n = 1,568), there was no difference in 10 years overall survival between those with TTC within or beyond 30 days (74.5% vs. 74.7%, p = 0.716), nor an increased risk of death for those with TTC beyond 30 days (HR 1.04 (95% CI 0.84–1.28), p = 0.716). Initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy beyond 30 days is associated with decreased 10 years overall survival in TNBC patients who underwent BCS. Therefore, timelier initiation of chemotherapy in TNBC patients undergoing BCS seems warranted. What's new? Current breast cancer treatment guidelines recommend that chemotherapy is initiated between 6‐12 weeks after surgery. Delayed treatment can lead to poorer outcome, but there's no precise definition of the optimal window. Recent work suggests that for patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), it's best to initiate chemotherapy within 30 days. Here, the authors evaluated outcomes for TNBC patients correlated with time to chemotherapy. They found that in patients undergoing breast‐conserving surgery, an interval of more than 30 days before chemotherapy was associated with decreased survival. If the patient had undergone a mastectomy, a longer delay before chemotherapy did not impact survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Heeg
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marissa C Van Maaren
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Kay Schreuder
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Rob A E M Tollenaar
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E M M Bos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Saving the Breast Saves the Lives of Breast Cancer Patients. Int J Surg Oncol 2020; 2020:8709231. [PMID: 32181017 PMCID: PMC7063187 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8709231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Revised: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Surgery has been known as the procedure of choice for breast cancer management since 1700 years before Christ. Nowadays, breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy are performed in selected cases with specific clinical criteria. Here, we compare these two procedures for breast cancer patients with variable features in Cancer Research Center, Tehran, as a single institution experience.
Collapse
|
21
|
Neron M, Lambaudie E, Thezenas S, Leaha C, Kerr C, Gonzague L, Provansal M, Colombo PE, Fabbro M. Impact of time to radiation therapy in adjuvant settings in endometrial carcinoma: A multicentric retrospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 247:121-126. [PMID: 32088529 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2019] [Revised: 02/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Time to adjuvant treatment could have an impact on cancer prognosis. It is possible that robotic surgery lengthens the healing time of vaginal cuff after minimally invasive hysterectomy. The objective of this study was to state the impact of time to RT (TTR) on prognosis in endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients and to assess variables associated with TTR. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a multicentric retrospective study in two cancer centers. We included EC patients, between January 1996 and January 2016. We searched variables associated with TTR and impact of TTR on end-points: local recurrence-free survival, metastatic-free survival, event-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS 329 patients were included and 279 were analyzed for TTR impact. Robotic surgery was associated with shorter TTR (8 weeks, 8.9 w for laparotomy, 9.2 w for laparoscopy). Pelvic lymphadenectomy, para-aortic lymphadenectomy, discussion in multidisciplinary meeting and treatment center was independently associated with TTR. No impact of TTR was shown on metastatic-free survival, event-free survival and overall survival but there was a trend of a decreased local recurrence rate in case of prolonged TTR (HRcontinuous variable = 1.08; CI95 %: 0.97-1.2). CONCLUSION Our study did not show any impact of treatment delay on survival end-points although prolonged TTR could moderate the benefit of radiotherapy on local control rate. Surgical route was not associated with TTR, particularly robot-associated laparoscopy did not lengthen treatment delay. TTR seems dependent of health-care organization and could represent a quality criterion of EC care for institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias Neron
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France.
| | - Eric Lambaudie
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Aix-Marseille Univ, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, 13000 Marseille, France
| | - Simon Thezenas
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France
| | - Cristina Leaha
- Department of Pathology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France
| | - Christine Kerr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France
| | - Laurence Gonzague
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Aix-Marseille Univ, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13000 Marseille, France
| | - Magali Provansal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Aix-Marseille Univ, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13000 Marseille, France
| | - Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France
| | - Michel Fabbro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Compared to Conventional Breast-Conserving Surgery With Regard to Oncologic Outcome. Clin Breast Cancer 2019; 19:423-432.e5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2019] [Revised: 05/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
23
|
Amant F, Berveiller P, Boere IA, Cardonick E, Fruscio R, Fumagalli M, Halaska MJ, Hasenburg A, Johansson ALV, Lambertini M, Lok CAR, Maggen C, Morice P, Peccatori F, Poortmans P, Van Calsteren K, Vandenbroucke T, van Gerwen M, van den Heuvel-Eibrink M, Zagouri F, Zapardiel I. Gynecologic cancers in pregnancy: guidelines based on a third international consensus meeting. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1601-1612. [PMID: 31435648 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
We aimed to provide comprehensive protocols and promote effective management of pregnant women with gynecological cancers. New insights and more experience have been gained since the previous guidelines were published in 2014. Members of the International Network on Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy (INCIP), in collaboration with other international experts, reviewed existing literature on their respective areas of expertise. Summaries were subsequently merged into a manuscript that served as a basis for discussion during the consensus meeting. Treatment of gynecological cancers during pregnancy is attainable if management is achieved by collaboration of a multidisciplinary team of health care providers. This allows further optimization of maternal treatment, while considering fetal development and providing psychological support and long-term follow-up of the infants. Nonionizing imaging procedures are preferred diagnostic procedures, but limited ionizing imaging methods can be allowed if indispensable for treatment plans. In contrast to other cancers, standard surgery for gynecological cancers often needs to be adapted according to cancer type and gestational age. Most standard regimens of chemotherapy can be administered after 14 weeks gestational age but are not recommended beyond 35 weeks. C-section is recommended for most cervical and vulvar cancers, whereas vaginal delivery is allowed in most ovarian cancers. Breast-feeding should be avoided with ongoing chemotherapeutic, endocrine or targeted treatment. More studies that focus on the long-term toxic effects of gynecologic cancer treatments are needed to provide a full understanding of their fetal impact. In particular, data on targeted therapies that are becoming standard of care in certain gynecological malignancies is still limited. Furthermore, more studies aimed at the definition of the exact prognosis of patients after antenatal cancer treatment are warranted. Participation in existing registries (www.cancerinpregnancy.org) and the creation of national tumor boards with multidisciplinary teams of care providers (supplementary Box S1, available at Annals of Oncology online) is encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Amant
- Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - P Berveiller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier de Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France
| | - I A Boere
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E Cardonick
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, USA
| | - R Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - M Fumagalli
- Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - M J Halaska
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 3rd Medical Faculty, Charles University and Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - A Hasenburg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mainz University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - A L V Johansson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino Hospital, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - C A R Lok
- Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands
| | - C Maggen
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P Morice
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Institute de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - F Peccatori
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - P Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie and Paris Sciences & Lettres - PSL University, Paris, France
| | - K Van Calsteren
- Department of Development and Regeneration, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - M van Gerwen
- Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - F Zagouri
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - I Zapardiel
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lesage M, Pilloy J, Fleurier C, Cirier J, Jourdan ML, Arbion F, Body G, Ouldamer L. [Prognosis impact of breast cancer adjuvant radiotherapy delay]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 47:516-521. [PMID: 30851415 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2019.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate delay to access to adjuvant radiotherapy for women with breast cancer and to study impact on prognosis. METHODS A restrospective descriptive study in the teaching hospital of Tours between 1st January 2007 and 31th December 2013. All women managed for an invasive breast cancer during this period were included with exclusion of women with indication of chemotherapy (neoadjuvant/adjuvant). Delay between surgery and radiotherapy were recorded. Overall survival and recurrence free survival were used to evaluate the impact of delays on prognosis. RESULTS Of the 1855 women with an invasive breast cancer, 904 (48.7%) had an adjuvant radiotherapy without chemotherapy. In the whole population, a delay surgery-radiotherapy>90 days was found as an independent factor negatively impacting recurrence free survival (HR=2.12 [1.03-4.36] p=0.04). In the group of patient with a breast conservative surgery, a delay surgery-radiotherapy>65 days was found as an independent factor negatively impacting recurrence free survival with HR=2.29 [1.16-4.54], p=0.02. A delay surgery-radiotherapy>70 days was found as an independent factor negatively impacting Overall survival and HR=3.41 [1.005-11.62], p=0.04. CONCLUSION Delay to access to adjuvant radiotherapy is an independent factor impacting patient's survival, especially in the case of breast conservative therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lesage
- Département de gynécologie, centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Tours, hôpital Bretonneau, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France; Faculté de médecine François-Rabelais, 10, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France
| | - J Pilloy
- Département de gynécologie, centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Tours, hôpital Bretonneau, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France; Faculté de médecine François-Rabelais, 10, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France
| | - C Fleurier
- Département de gynécologie, centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Tours, hôpital Bretonneau, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France; Faculté de médecine François-Rabelais, 10, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France
| | - J Cirier
- Département de gynécologie, centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Tours, hôpital Bretonneau, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France; Faculté de médecine François-Rabelais, 10, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France
| | - M L Jourdan
- Unité Inserm 1069, 10, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France
| | - F Arbion
- Département de pathologie, centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Tours, hôpital Bretonneau, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France
| | - G Body
- Département de gynécologie, centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Tours, hôpital Bretonneau, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France; Faculté de médecine François-Rabelais, 10, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France; Département de pathologie, centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Tours, hôpital Bretonneau, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France
| | - L Ouldamer
- Département de gynécologie, centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Tours, hôpital Bretonneau, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France; Faculté de médecine François-Rabelais, 10, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France; Unité Inserm 1069, 10, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kıbış EY, Büyüktahtakın IE. Optimizing multi-modal cancer treatment under 3D spatio-temporal tumor growth. Math Biosci 2018; 307:53-69. [PMID: 30389401 DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2018.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2017] [Revised: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
In this paper we introduce a new mixed-integer linear programming (MIP) model that explicitly integrates the spread of cancer cells into a spatio-temporal reaction-diffusion (RD) model of cancer growth, while taking into account treatment effects. This linear but non-convex model appears to be the first of its kind by determining the optimal sequence of the typically prescribed cancer treatment methods-surgery (S), chemotherapy (C), and radiotherapy (R)-while minimizing the newly generated tumor cells for early-stage breast cancer in a unique three-dimensional (3D) spatio-temporal system. The quadratically-constrained cancer growth dynamics and treatment impact formulations are linearized by using linearization as well as approximation techniques. Under the supervision of medical oncologists and utilizing several literature resources for the parameter values, the effectiveness of treatment combinations for breast cancer specified with different sequences (i.e., SRC, SCR, CR, RC) are compared by tracking the number of cancer cells at the end of each treatment modality. Our results provide the optimal dosages for chemotherapy and radiation treatments, while minimizing the growth of new cancer cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eyyüb Y Kıbış
- Huether School of Business, The College of Saint Rose, Albany, NY, USA
| | - I Esra Büyüktahtakın
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zhang WW, Wu SG, Sun JY, Li FY, He ZY. Long-term survival effect of the interval between mastectomy and radiotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10:2047-2054. [PMID: 30038520 PMCID: PMC6053260 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s163863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The timing of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) may influence locoregional recurrence and survival outcomes. In this study, we assessed the long-term survival effect of the interval between surgery and PMRT in locally advanced breast cancer treated with mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods In this retrospective study, we included women with locally advanced breast cancer who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and PMRT after mastectomy between 1999 and 2007. Based on the interval between surgery and PMRT, the patients were classified into three groups: Group 1 (≤4 vs >4 months), Group 2 (≤5 vs >5 months), and Group 3 (≤6 vs >6 months). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine the prognostic factors of survival outcomes. Results A total of 340 women were included in this study, and the median follow-up duration was 79.8 months. The median surgery–PMRT interval was 5 months. The surgery–PMRT interval including Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 was not significantly associated with locoregional recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival. In addition, in the subgroup analysis of the effect of surgery–PMRT interval on survival outcomes according to various clinicopathologic factors, the surgery–PMRT interval was also not associated with survival outcomes in different age groups, tumor stage, and breast cancer subtypes. Conclusion Our findings suggest that the delay in the start of PMRT in locally advanced breast cancer does not increase the likelihood of locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, and death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Wen Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China,
| | - San-Gang Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361003, People's Republic of China
| | - Jia-Yuan Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China,
| | - Feng-Yan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China,
| | - Zhen-Yu He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China,
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jabo B, Lin AC, Aljehani MA, Ji L, Morgan JW, Selleck MJ, Kim HY, Lum SS. Impact of Breast Reconstruction on Time to Definitive Surgical Treatment, Adjuvant Therapy, and Breast Cancer Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:3096-3105. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6663-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
28
|
Sato K, Fuchikami H, Takeda N, Kato M, Shimo T, Okawa T. Validating the efficacy of single-stage breast-conserving therapy using multicatheter partial-breast brachytherapy based on updated ASTRO guidelines. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2018; 59:303-308. [PMID: 29697840 PMCID: PMC5967449 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rry033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2017] [Revised: 02/12/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Based on the accumulating evidence for equivalent results of partial-breast irradiation (PBI) and whole-breast irradiation (WBI) in breast-conserving therapy (BCT), the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) updated the consensus statement (CS) to expand the range of potential candidates for PBI outside clinical trials. Of the various techniques, PBI using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MCB) is the oldest and has long-term data. In this study, the efficacy of single-stage BCT using MCB-PBI achieved by an intraoperative catheter placement was validated on updated ASTRO guidelines. We retrospectively examined patients undergoing BCT using MCB-PBI or WBI. The updated CS distinguished patients aged 40-49 years with ER+, tumor ≤2 cm, and margin ≥2 mm from unsuitable patients in the previous CS. We compared the ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) rate in MCB-PBI with that in WBI patients with suitable or cautionary (S/C) categories on the updated CS. Between November 2007 and September 2017, 641 patients with 647 lesions underwent BCT (MCB-PBI, 407; WBI, 240). At the median follow-up time of 54.4 months, we observed 8 (1.97%; 95% CI: 0.62-3.31%) and 7 (2.92%; 95% CI: 0.79-5.05%) IBTRs, respectively. Updating the CS increased the S/C patients receiving MCB-PBI from 232 patients (57.0%) to 319 (78.4%). Comparison of clinical outcomes at the 12-month minimum follow-up between 291 MCB-PBI and 103 WBI in S/C patients showed no significant differences in the 4-year rate of IBTR-free (100% vs 98.9%; P = 0.29) and disease-free survival (98.7% vs 95.5%; P = 0.24). Overall, single-stage BCT using MCB-PBI offered similar tumor control rates, compared with WBI, on the updated ASTRO CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuhiko Sato
- Department of Breast Oncology, Tokyo-West Tokushukai Hospital, 3-1-1 Matsubara, Akishima, 196-0003, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiromi Fuchikami
- Department of Breast Oncology, Tokyo-West Tokushukai Hospital, 3-1-1 Matsubara, Akishima, 196-0003, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoko Takeda
- Department of Breast Oncology, Tokyo-West Tokushukai Hospital, 3-1-1 Matsubara, Akishima, 196-0003, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Kato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo-West Tokushukai Hospital, 3-1-1 Matsubara, Akishima, 196-0003, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Shimo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo-West Tokushukai Hospital, 3-1-1 Matsubara, Akishima, 196-0003, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Okawa
- Preventive Medical Center, Sano City Hospital, 1832-1 Tanuma, Sano, 327-0317, Tochigi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Strnad V, Major T, Polgar C, Lotter M, Guinot JL, Gutierrez-Miguelez C, Galalae R, Van Limbergen E, Guix B, Niehoff P, Lössl K, Hannoun-Levi JM. ESTRO-ACROP guideline: Interstitial multi-catheter breast brachytherapy as Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation alone or as boost - GEC-ESTRO Breast Cancer Working Group practical recommendations. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:411-420. [PMID: 29691075 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Revised: 04/06/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This consensus statement from the Breast Cancer Working Group of Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie of European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) aims at generating practical guidelines for multi-catheter image-guided brachytherapy in the conservative management of breast cancer patients used for either Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) or for a breast boost. METHODS Recent advances in techniques of multi-catheter brachytherapy were summarized and all the relevant literature was reviewed by a panel of experts. Panel members of the GEC-ESTRO experts participated in a series of conferences, supplemented their clinical experience, were surveyed to determine their current practices and patterns, performed a literature review, and formulated recommendations for implementing APBI with multi-catheter brachytherapy, focusing on treatment planning issues, catheter insertion, dosimetry and quality assurance. This document was reviewed and approved by the full panel, the GEC-ESTRO executive board and by the ACROP (Advisory Committee on Radiation Oncology Practice). RESULTS Three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning, catheter insertion techniques, dosimetry and methods of quality assurance for APBI and boost with multi-catheter image-guided brachytherapy after breast conserving surgery are described. Detailed recommendations for daily practice including dose constraints are given. CONCLUSIONS Recent standards and guidelines for the use of APBI with different multi-catheter image-guided brachytherapy techniques have been defined. Different techniques are used to insert the catheters. Guidelines are mandatory to assure precise catheter insertion for coverage of the target volume and to guarantee high-quality dosimetry. The same rules apply for brachytherapy based boost irradiation for breast cancer after whole breast irradiation as well as for partial breast re-irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vratislav Strnad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Tibor Major
- Center of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology Budapest, Hungary
| | - Csaba Polgar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Michael Lotter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jose-Luis Guinot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Razvan Galalae
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Evangelische Kliniken, Gelsenkirchen, Germany
| | - Erik Van Limbergen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Benjamin Guix
- IMOR Foundation, Medical Institute for Radiotherapy and Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Peter Niehoff
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sana Hospital Offenbach, Germany
| | - Kristina Lössl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|