Does location matter? Rural vs urban outcomes after blood and marrow transplantation in a population-based Canadian cohort

Access to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in Canada for Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant is a complicated intervention only offered in specialized centers. Access to transplants may vary based on the location of primary residence, income levels, age, and reported race or ethnicity. Using data from the Canadian Institute of Health (CIH) Discharge abstract database (DAD), all non-Quebec Canadians under the age of 65 with a diagnosis of AML between 2004 and 2015 were included in this study. Descriptive statistics were produced for the variables of interest: time period, age, sex, rurality, transplant status, proportion of visible minorities, proportion identifying as indigenous, and proportion of low-income families. Transplant rates were compared and reported using univariable and multivariable analysis. In multivariable analysis, time period, province of residence, gender, and age were significantly associated with the receipt of an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. However, differences in transplant rates observed in indigenous patients, low-income families, and visible minorities were not found to be statistically significant. In non-Quebec Canada, transplant rates vary significantly with province of residence, with the highest rates recorded in Alberta. Contrary to findings previously reported in studies exploring access to transplant in the United States, a low-income level was not associated with lower rates of transplants. This might suggest that Canada’s universal health care insurance program is protective against socioeconomic barriers that impact access to health care services.

The impact of socioeconomic disparities on the use of upfront autologous stem cell transplantation for mantle cell lymphoma

Using the National Cancer Database, we identified 10,290 patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) treated with chemotherapy with or without upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Only 17% of patients underwent ASCT. Patients who underwent ASCT were younger and more likely to have lower comorbidity scores, private insurance, higher income and education, and treatment received at an academic facility. On multivariable analysis, age, comorbidity index, insurance type, the transition of care, facility type, distance to facility, and diagnosis year were predictive for ASCT use. ASCT use was associated with improved 5-year overall survival in younger (82% vs. 64%, p < .001) and older (70% vs. 40%, p < .001) patients, which was retained in the matched propensity score and 12-month analyses. Female gender, the diagnosis year ≥2009, private insurance, higher income, and education were associated with superior survival, whereas Black race and higher comorbidities predicted inferior survival.

Regional differences in access to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation among pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Indications for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are primarily dependent on risk stratification at diagnosis and relapse status. We sought to determine whether access to HSCT is influenced by regional and socioeconomic factors.

METHODS

Children with newly diagnosed AML aged < 15 years between 2001 and 2015 were identified using the Cancer in Young People in Canada national population-based registry. Factors potentially associated with the receipt of HSCT were studied using univariate and multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Overall, 568 children with newly diagnosed AML were included and 262 (46%) received HSCT. A greater proportion of patients, 103/157 (65.6%), underwent HSCT after first or subsequent relapse compared to 159/411 (38.7%) patients who underwent transplant before relapse. Among patients for whom HSCT would be considered before relapse, factors associated with higher odds of HSCT in a multivariable analysis were: poor versus good-risk cytogenetics (Odds ratio [OR]: 30.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.7-117.0), diagnosis during 2012-2015 versus 2001-2006 (OR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.6-6.3), diagnosis in eastern Canada versus central Canada (OR: 3.7, 95% CI: 1.9-7.3), and age 10-14 years versus age < 1 year (OR: 5.4, 95% CI: 2.3-12.8). Among patients for whom HSCT would be considered after first relapse, higher odds of HSCT was associated with diagnosis at a HSCT center (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.1-4.1).

CONCLUSION

Patients diagnosed at a HSCT performing center and patients from eastern Canada had higher odds of receiving HSCT. This may suggest preferential access to HSCT for certain patients.

Inferior Access to Allogeneic Transplant in Disadvantaged Populations: A Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Analysis

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is offered in a limited number of medical centers and is associated with significant direct and indirect costs. The degree to which social and geographic barriers reduce access to alloHCT is unknown. Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program (SEER) and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) were integrated to determine the rate of unrelated donor (URD) alloHCT for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) performed between 2000 and 2010 in the 612 counties covered by SEER. The total incidence of AML, ALL, and MDS was determined using SEER, and the number of alloHCTs performed in the same time period and geographic area were determined using the CIBMTR database. We then determined which sociodemographic attributes influenced the rate of alloHCT (rural/urban status, median family size, percentage of residents below the poverty line, and percentage of minority race). In the entire cohort, higher levels of poverty were associated with lower rates of alloHCT (estimated rate ratio [ERR], .86 for a 10% increase in the percentage of the population below the poverty line; P < .01), whereas rural location was not (ERR, .87; P = .11). Thus, patients from areas with higher poverty rates diagnosed with ALL, AML, and MDS are less likely patients from wealthier counties to undergo URD alloHCT. There is need to better understand the reasons for this disparity and to encourage policy and advocacy efforts to improve access to medical care for all.

Impact of Home-to-Centre Distance on Bone Marrow Transplantation Outcomes

Objectives

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in Oman started in 1994 at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH), Muscat, Oman. Previous studies have suggested that longer driving time to the transplant centre (DTC) independently correlates with worse overall survival (OS). Therefore, this study aimed to examine the impact of DTC on OS and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD).

Methods

This retrospective study included all patients who underwent HSCT between February 2006 and December 2016 at SQUH. The DTC was determined using Google Maps (Google LLC., Mountain View, California, USA). The probability of OS was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier estimator and the impact of DTC on OS was compared using a Cox model.

Results

A total of 170 patients were included in this study of which 52% were male and 28% were from the Al Batinah region. The mean age was 14.2 ± 12.2 years. The mean haemoglobin, platelet and white blood cell counts before the HSCT were 10.3 ± 1.7 g/dL, 207 ± 131 × 10⁹/L and 5.1 ± 5.9 × 10⁹/L, respectively. The median DTC for those with aGvHD was 84 minutes, which is similar to patients without aGvHD (P = 0.918). The hazard ratio for DTC as a predictor of OS was 1.0 (P = 0.901).

Conclusion

In this single centre study, DTC did not impact aGvHD or OS in patients post-HSCT. The study was limited by its retrospective design and the small sample size. It is recommended that these results be confirmed in a prospective study.

The care center influences the management of lymphoma patients in a universal health care system: an observational cohort study

Background

Healthcare providers-related disparities in adherence to the treatment plan among lymphoma patients are found even in a universal healthcare system, but the mechanism remains unclear. We investigated the association between the type of care center and the relative dose intensity and determined whether it persists after adjustment for patients’ recruitment differences.

Methods

Prospective observational cohort study of 294 patients treated with standard protocols for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in teaching or community public hospitals or in private centers in the French Midi-Pyrénées region from 2006–2013. To test our assumptions, we used multinomial and mixed-effect logistic models progressively adjusted for patients’ biomedical characteristics, socio-spatial characteristics and treatment-related toxicity events.

Results

Patients treated using standard protocols in the teaching hospital had more advanced stage and poorer initial prognosis without limitation regarding the distance from the residence to the care center. Patients’ recruitment profile across the different types of care center failed to explain the difference in relative dose intensity. Low relative dose intensity was less often observed in teaching hospital than elsewhere.

Conclusion

We showed that even in a universal healthcare system, disparities in the management of DLBCL patients’ do exist according to the types of care center. A main issue may be to find and diffuse the reasons of this benefit in cancer management in the teaching hospital to the other centers.

Effect of place of residence and treatment on survival outcomes in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in British Columbia

BACKGROUND

We examined the relationship between location of residence at the time of diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and health outcomes in a geographically large Canadian province with publicly funded, universally available medical care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The British Columbia Cancer Registry was used to identify all patients 18-80 years of age diagnosed with DLBCL between January 2003 and December 2008. Home and treatment center postal codes were used to determine urban versus rural status and driving distance to access treatment.

RESULTS

We identified 1,357 patients. The median age was 64 years (range: 18-80 years), 59% were male, 50% were stage III/IV, 84% received chemotherapy with curative intent, and 32% received radiotherapy. There were 186 (14%) who resided in rural areas, 141 (10%) in small urban areas, 183 (14%) in medium urban areas, and 847 (62%) in large urban areas. Patient and treatment characteristics were similar regardless of location. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 62% for patients in rural areas, 44% in small urban areas, 53% in medium urban areas, and 60% in large urban areas (p = .018). In multivariate analysis, there was no difference in OS between rural and large urban area patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7-1.4), although patients in small urban areas (HR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.0-2.0) and medium urban areas (HR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.0-1.9) had worse OS than those in large urban areas.

CONCLUSION

Place of residence at diagnosis is associated with survival of patients with DLBCL in British Columbia, Canada. Rural patients have similar survival to those in large urban areas, whereas patients living in small and medium urban areas experience worse outcomes.

A population-based analysis of the effect of autologous hematopoietic cell transplant in the treatment of multiple myeloma

This population registry-based study followed all cases of myeloma diagnosed in New South Wales, Australia, during 2002-2005 and compared survival outcomes of those who proceeded to autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) with those who did not. Data available consisted of demographic details and survival, and did not include disease details or treatment type or response. Of 708 patients, 270 (38%) had a HCT. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of HCT recipients was significantly better than for those who did not proceed to HCT (62% vs. 54%, p = 0.003). HCT was a significant favorable risk factor for OS, while age over 60 was an adverse risk factor. However, for patients alive at 1 year from diagnosis, there was no significant difference in survival between HCT and non-HCT patients, suggesting that worse disease biology and/or coexisting morbidities were likely to be major reasons for the poorer outcome for non-HCT patients.

The impact of geographic proximity to transplant center on outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) need access to specialized care. We hypothesized that access to the transplant center after HSCT may be challenging for patients living in geographically distant areas, and that this would have an adverse effect on their outcome. We analyzed 1912 adult patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT at the Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center (DF/BWCC) between 1996 and 2009 and who resided within 6 hours driving time of the institution. Driving time from primary residence to DF/BWCC based on zipcode was determined using geographic information systems. The median driving time (range) to DF/BWCC was 72 (2-358) minutes. When patients were stratified by driving time quartile, overall survival (OS) after HSCT was similar in the first year but worse after 1 year in patients in the top quartile (≥ 160 minutes driving time). In a landmark analysis of the 909 patients alive and free of disease at 1 year, 5-year OS was 76% and 65% for patients in the first (≤ 40 minutes) and fourth (≥ 160 minutes) quartiles, respectively (P = .027). This was confirmed in a multivariable analysis. The difference appeared to be mostly because of an increase in nonrelapse mortality. The number of visits to the transplant center between day 100 and 365 after HSCT declined significantly with increasing driving time to the transplant center, which was independently associated with worse survival. Long driving time to the transplant center is associated with worse OS in patients alive and disease-free 1 year after HSCT, independently of other patient-, disease-, and HSCT-related variables. This may be in part related to the lower frequency of post-HSCT visits in patients living farther away.

Access to allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for patients with MDS or relapsed AML treated according to protocols of the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group

To investigate whether all patients in need of an allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) are offered one, we retrospectively investigated the policy for all children diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndrome (n=90) or relapsed AML (n=75) between 1998 and 2008. These children are registered at diagnosis and treated according to protocols of the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group, which provides accurate disease incidence data and protocol-indicated appropriateness for HSCT. For 48 (30%) patients, a family donor was identified; for 90 (57%) patients, an unrelated donor (UD) search was performed; and for 21 (13%) patients, no UD search was initiated. Reasons for not initiating an UD search include: progressive disease (n=10), conserve quality of life (n=1), stable disease (n=3), immunosuppressive therapy (n=2), patient death (n=3), patient lives abroad (n=1) and second relapse (n=1). On the basis of the time interval between date of diagnosis and date of death/last follow-up, for eight (5%) patients, it may be questioned why an UD search was not performed. The fact that 95% of all children are given the option of an allogeneic HSCT is encouraging and reasons not to transplant seem fair in most cases.