1
|
Ruan X, Xu C, Huang H, Xu B, Du J, Cheng J, Jin F, Gu M, Kong W, Yin C, Wu Y, Tian Q, Cao Y, Wu R, Xu L, Jin J, Li Y, Dai Y, Ju R, Ma F, Wang G, Wei W, Huang X, Qin M, Lin Y, Sun Y, Liu R, Zhang W, Li X, Zou L, Hao M, Ye X, Wang F, Wang Y, Hu Z, Huang Y, Zhu T, Yang C, Wang J, Yang X, Ni R, Wang L, Luo G, Min A, Zhang S, Li P, Cheng L, Li L, Jin Q, Shi D, Li Y, Ren F, Cheng Y, Niu J, Tian Y, Mueck AO. Practice guideline on ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation in the prevention and treatment of iatrogenic premature ovarian insufficiency. Maturitas 2024; 182:107922. [PMID: 38325136 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.107922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) refers to the decline of ovarian function before the age of 40. POI causes a reduction in or loss of female fertility, accompanied by different degrees of menopausal symptoms, which increases the risk of chronic diseases related to early menopause and seriously affects patients' quality of life and health. It is conservatively estimated that at least one million prepubertal girls and women of reproductive age in China are at risk of iatrogenic POI caused by radiotherapy and chemotherapy every year. With the development of medical technology and the breakthrough of scientific and technological advances, preventing and treating iatrogenic POI have become possible. International and national guidelines consider cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation to be the most promising method of preserving the ovarian function and fertility of prepubertal girls and women of reproductive age who cannot delay radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In order to guide the clinical application of ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation technology in China, the Guideline Working Group finally included 14 scientific questions and 18 recommendations through a questionnaire survey, field investigation, and consultation of a large number of Chinese and English literature databases in order to provide a reference for colleagues in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangyan Ruan
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China; Department for Women's Health, University Women's Hospital and Research Center for Women's Health, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Che Xu
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China; Fuxing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hefeng Huang
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics, Shool of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Binghe Xu
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Juan Du
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jiaojiao Cheng
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Fengyu Jin
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Muqing Gu
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Weimin Kong
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chenghong Yin
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yurui Wu
- Children's Hospital, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China
| | - Qinjie Tian
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College/Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yunxia Cao
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China
| | - Ruifang Wu
- Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Liangzhi Xu
- West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jing Jin
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yanglu Li
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yinmei Dai
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Rui Ju
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Fei Ma
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Gang Wang
- Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Wei Wei
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | | - Maoquan Qin
- National Center for Children's Health, Hematology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Lin
- Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fujian, China
| | - Yuan Sun
- Beijing Jingdu Children's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Rong Liu
- Children's Hospital, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaodong Li
- The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei, China
| | - Lin Zou
- Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Guangdong, China
| | - Min Hao
- Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
| | - Xiyang Ye
- Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, China
| | - Fuling Wang
- The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Yue Wang
- Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Zhuoying Hu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yanhong Huang
- Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Tianyuan Zhu
- Gansu Provincial Maternal and Child-care Hospital/Gansu Province Central Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Caihong Yang
- The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Ningxia, China
| | - Jinping Wang
- Zibo Maternal And Child Health Hospital, Zibo, China
| | - Xiaomin Yang
- Liuzhou Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Liuzhou, China
| | - Rong Ni
- The Central Hospital of Enshi Tu Jia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi, China
| | - Liqun Wang
- Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Jiangxi, China
| | - Guangxia Luo
- The First People's Hospital of Huaihua (Hunan University of Medicine General Hospital), Huaihua, China
| | - Aiping Min
- People's Hospital of Leshan City, Leshan, China
| | - Siyou Zhang
- The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China
| | - Peiling Li
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Linghui Cheng
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China
| | - Lianfang Li
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Huairou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Huairou, China
| | - Quanfang Jin
- Shanghai Baoshan Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Dongmei Shi
- Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Yinchuan, Yinchuan, China
| | - Yan Li
- Luoyang Anhe Hospital, Luoyang, China
| | | | | | - Jumin Niu
- Shenyang Women's and Children's Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Ying Tian
- XiangXi Ninger Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Xiangxi, China
| | - Alfred O Mueck
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China; Department for Women's Health, University Women's Hospital and Research Center for Women's Health, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Perelli F, Fusi G, Lonati L, Gargano T, Maffi M, Avanzini S, Palo F, Blanco Verdú MD, Del Cañizo López A, Garrido Colino C, Perucca G, Mattioli G, Gennari F, Lima M, Guanà R. Laparoscopic ovarian tissue collection for fertility preservation in children with malignancies: a multicentric experience. Front Surg 2024; 11:1352698. [PMID: 38322410 PMCID: PMC10844397 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1352698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Long survivors after childhood cancer are increasing thanks to oncological improvements. Their quality of life and fertility-sparing should be considered in the early phases of each oncological pathway. Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue removed before starting gonadotoxic therapies is the only fertility sparing procedure available for prepubertal children affected by cancer and it does not affect the timing of the start of the treatment. Materials and methods The present study shows the surgical and clinical outcomes following laparoscopic ovarian tissue collection (LOTC) for a total of 311 patients aged between 0 and 17 years old from four different European Centers. Results Only two major complications were reported according to the Clavien Dindo classification (0.6%). Discussion LOTC can be considered a safe procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Perelli
- Department of Gynecology and Pediatrics, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulia Fusi
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, IRCCS Meyer Children’s Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Lonati
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Regina Margherita Children’s Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Tommaso Gargano
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Sant’Orsola Children’s Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Michela Maffi
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Sant’Orsola Children’s Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Federico Palo
- Pediatric Surgery Department, IRCCS G. Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Giulia Perucca
- Pediatric Radiology Unit, Great Hormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Fabrizio Gennari
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Regina Margherita Children’s Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Mario Lima
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Sant’Orsola Children’s Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Guanà
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Regina Margherita Children’s Hospital, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Finkelstein T, Zhang Y, Vollenhoven B, Rolnik DL, Horta F. Successful pregnancy rates amongst patients undergoing ovarian tissue cryopreservation for non-malignant indications: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 292:30-39. [PMID: 37952490 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) is a fertility preservation method that has been clinically applied for almost 30 years. Studies specifically evaluating patients presenting with non-malignant indications for OTC and their subsequent pregnancy rates are limited. OBJECTIVE To summarise the evidence on the rates of successful pregnancy amongst women who have undergone OTC for non-malignant indications. METHODS A systematic review with meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration CRD42022307925) was conducted to investigate the pregnancy outcomes of patients who have undergone ovarian tissue cryopreservation for non-malignant indications. Articles published in EMBASE and Ovid MEDLINE before October 2022 were screened for inclusion based on the following criteria: original human studies pertaining to OTC with a defined non-malignant cohort and pregnancy outcomes. The successful pregnancy rates were pooled with a random-effects model of double-arcsine transformed proportions. Sensitivity analysis involved pooling the results of studies with a low risk of bias after being assessed with NIH tools. RESULTS The database search retrieved 3,225 results, of which 16 were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled successful pregnancy rate was 23.52 % (16 studies, 95 % CI 6.48 to 44.79 %). When subgroup analysis of study types was performed, the successful pregnancy rate was higher amongst case series (47.02 %, 9 studies, 95 % CI 6.98 to 89.00 %) than cohort studies (14.64 %, 7 studies, 95 % CI 3.59 to 29.78 %). Sensitivity analysis limited to studies at low risk of bias revealed a similar pooled successful pregnancy rate of 23.35 % (12 studies, 95 % CI 2.50 to 51.96 %). CONCLUSIONS Approximately one quarter of women who underwent OTC for non-malignant indications had a successful pregnancy. These findings are clinically important for fertility preservation counselling by providing greater evidence for more informed care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Finkelstein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
| | - Y Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - B Vollenhoven
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia; Women's and Newborn, Monash Health, Australia; Monash IVF Melbourne, Australia
| | - D L Rolnik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia; Women's and Newborn, Monash Health, Australia
| | - F Horta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia; Monash Data Future Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Australia; City Fertility, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee YJ, Kim JS, Jo JC, Kim Y, Im HS, Kim H, Koh S, Min YJ, Park SH, Ahn JW, Choi Y. Risk factors of menopause after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in premenopausal adult women. Eur J Haematol 2023. [PMID: 37308461 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.14027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative option for most hematologic malignancies. However, HSCT can cause early menopause and various complications in premenopausal women. Therefore, we aimed to investigate risk factors predicting early menopause and its clinical implications among survivors post HCT. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 30 adult women who had received HCT at premenopausal status between 2015 and 2018. We excluded patients who had received autologous stem cell transplantation, had relapsed, or died of any cause within 2 years of HCT. RESULTS The median age at HCT was 41.6 years (range, 22-53). Post-HCT menopause was identified in 90% of myeloablative conditioning (MAC) HCT and 55% of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) HCT (p = .101). In the multivariate analysis, the post-HCT menopausal risk was 21 times higher in a MAC regimen containing 4 days of busulfan (p = .016) and 9.3 times higher in RIC regimens containing 2-3 days of busulfan (p = .033) than that of non-busulfan-based conditioning regimens. CONCLUSIONS Higher busulfan dose in conditioning regimens is the most significant risk factor affecting post-HCT early menopause. Considering our data, we need to decide on conditioning regimens and individualized fertility counseling before HCT for premenopausal women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoo Jin Lee
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Jeong Sook Kim
- Department of Obstetrics, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Jae-Cheol Jo
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Youjin Kim
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Hyeon-Soo Im
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Hyeyeong Kim
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea
| | - SuJin Koh
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Young Joo Min
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Sang-Hyuk Park
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Jun Woo Ahn
- Department of Obstetrics, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Yunsuk Choi
- Department of Hematology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ní Dhonnabháin B, Elfaki N, Fraser K, Petrie A, Jones BP, Saso S, Hardiman PJ, Getreu N. A comparison of fertility preservation outcomes in patients who froze oocytes, embryos, or ovarian tissue for medically indicated circumstances: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2022; 117:1266-1276. [PMID: 35459522 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare obstetric outcomes in patients cryopreserving reproductive cells or tissues before gonadotoxic therapy. DESIGN A literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines on Embase, Medline, and Web of Science. Studies reporting obstetric outcomes in cancer patients who completed cryopreservation of oocyte, embryo, or ovarian tissue were included. SETTING Not applicable. PATIENT(S) Cancer patients attempting pregnancy using cryopreserved cells or tissues frozen before cancer therapy. INTERVENTION(S) Oocyte, embryo, or ovarian tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation in cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) The total numbers of clinical pregnancies, live births, and miscarriages in women attempting pregnancy using cryopreserved reproductive cells or tissues were calculated. A meta-analysis determined the effect size of each intervention. RESULT(S) The search returned 4,038 unique entries. Thirty-eight eligible studies were analyzed. The clinical pregnancy rates were 34.9%, 49.0%, and 43.8% for oocyte, embryo, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation, respectively. No significant differences were found among groups. The live birth rates were 25.8%, 35.3%, and 32.3% for oocyte, embryo, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation, respectively, with no significant differences among groups. The miscarriage rates were 9.2%, 16.9%, and 7.5% for oocyte, embryo, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation, respectively. Significantly fewer miscarriages occurred with ovarian tissue cryopreservation than with embryo cryopreservation. CONCLUSION(S) This enquiry is required to counsel cancer patients wishing to preserve fertility. Although the limitations of this study include heterogeneity, lack of quality studies, and low utilization rates, it serves as a starting point for comparison of reproductive and obstetric outcomes in patients returning for family-planning after gonadotoxic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bríd Ní Dhonnabháin
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nagla Elfaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kyra Fraser
- Department of Surgery, The Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Aviva Petrie
- Biostatistics Unit, Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Benjamin P Jones
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul J Hardiman
- Department of Gynaecology, The Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Natalie Getreu
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Metcalfe K, Ghattaura H, Elbourne C, Ashour K, Lane S, Lakhoo K. Conventional 3-port vs. single-incision laparoscopic oophorectomy for ovarian cryopreservation in paediatric surgery: a retrospective case-note review. ANNALS OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY 2022. [DOI: 10.1186/s43159-022-00161-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
We aim to compare conventional 3-port with single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for oophorectomy in patients undergoing ovarian cryopreservation.
Background
Demand for cryopreservation of ovarian tissue prior to the initiation of gonadotoxic treatment has risen significantly since its introduction in England in 2013. Traditionally, laparoscopic oophorectomy is performed using a 3-port technique with an umbilical port and 2 smaller 5-mm working ports. Energy devices can be used to allow haemostatic dissection of the ovary and this is delivered through the umbilical port site. In an attempt to improve efficiency, post-operative outcomes, and enhance cosmesis; our department initiated the use of the Applied Medical GelPoint Mini Advanced Access Platform single port technique using a vertical trans-umbilical approach for ovarian cryopreservation.
Methods
All patients undergoing laparoscopic oophorectomy for cryopreservation between September 2013 and August 2017 were included. The patients were consented for SILS, 3-port and open oophorectomies. All patients received maximum local anaesthetic wound infiltration intra-operatively. Case notes and theatre electronic data were reviewed and data was collected on additional procedure, conversion rate, operative time, post-operative analgesia requirement, complications and length of hospital stay.
Results
A total of 106 patients underwent laparoscopic oophorectomy during the study period. Of these, 40 underwent conventional 3-port, 65 had SILS and 1 patient had open. No cases were converted from the intended method. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean operative time; with SILS being faster than the conventional 3-port method (SILS: 40.4 min; 3-port: 51.7 min; p = 0.017). There was no difference in length of stay or perioperative analgesics, and complication rates in both groups were low. Informal qualitative feedback included surgeons stating that the ovary was much easier to deliver using the SILS technique. Patients were also happy with a single cosmetically appeasing scar hidden within the umbilicus.
Conclusion
SILS is an acceptable technique in ovarian cryopreservation allowing a quicker operative time, easier delivery of the ovary, and better cosmesis. A learning curve is recognised due to the ergonomics of single port laparoscopy; however, the technique can be established easily in departments with existing laparoscopic capabilities. This is the first paper which establishes this within a Paediatric Surgical setting, and adult literature suggests that further prospective trials may prove some benefit in ovarian tissue volume or time to initiation of treatment due to enhanced recovery.
Collapse
|
7
|
Dolmans MM, Hossay C, Nguyen TYT, Poirot C. Fertility Preservation: How to Preserve Ovarian Function in Children, Adolescents and Adults. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10225247. [PMID: 34830528 PMCID: PMC8621487 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10225247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy, pelvic radiotherapy and ovarian surgery have known gonadotoxic effects that can lead to endocrine dysfunction, cessation of ovarian endocrine activity and early depletion of the ovarian reserve, causing a risk for future fertility problems, even in children. Important determinants of this risk are the patient’s age and ovarian reserve, type of treatment and dose. When the risk of premature ovarian insufficiency is high, fertility preservation strategies must be offered to the patient. Furthermore, fertility preservation may sometimes be needed in conditions other than cancer, such as in non-malignant diseases or in patients seeking fertility preservation for personal reasons. Oocyte and/or embryo vitrification and ovarian tissue cryopreservation are the two methods currently endorsed by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, yielding encouraging results in terms of pregnancy and live birth rates. The choice of one technique above the other depends mostly on the age and pubertal status of the patient, and personal and medical circumstances. This review focuses on the available fertility preservation techniques, their appropriateness according to patient age and their efficacy in terms of pregnancy and live birth rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Madeleine Dolmans
- Gynecology Research Unit, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Av. Mounier 52, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; (C.H.); (T.Y.T.N.)
- Department of Gynecology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Av. Hippocrate 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
- Correspondence:
| | - Camille Hossay
- Gynecology Research Unit, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Av. Mounier 52, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; (C.H.); (T.Y.T.N.)
| | - Thu Yen Thi Nguyen
- Gynecology Research Unit, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Av. Mounier 52, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; (C.H.); (T.Y.T.N.)
| | - Catherine Poirot
- Department of Hematology, AYA Unit, Saint Louis Hospital AP-HP, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France;
- Médecine Sorbonne Université, Site Pitié Salpêtrière, 91 Bd de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
- Department of Reproductive Biology, Cochin Hospital AP-HP, 123 Bd de Port Royal, 75014 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wikander I, Lundberg FE, Nilsson H, Borgström B, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA. A Prospective Study on Fertility Preservation in Prepubertal and Adolescent Girls Undergoing Hematological Stem Cell Transplantation. Front Oncol 2021; 11:692834. [PMID: 34277437 PMCID: PMC8278233 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.692834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hematological stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an established method which has markedly increased the survival rate of hematologic malignancies since its introduction in the 1980’s. The conditioning for HSCT has known gonadotoxic effects and often leads to premature loss of fertility. In this study we have prospectively followed a cohort of girls undergoing HSCT and studied the outcomes of fertility preservation treatments performed before or after HSCT, as well as the long-term reproductive outcome. Methods In this one-center prospective study, 39 girls counselled for fertility preservation prior to or after conditioning for HSCT for malignant or benign diseases at childhood or adolescence between 1990 and 2017 were included. The patients were presented with the option to undergo cryopreservation of ovarian tissue or oocytes depending on their age and the time available. Follicle counts of the ovarian tissue and number of oocytes collected before or after HSCT were compared between patients treated for benign and malignant diseases. Hormone measurements post HSCT treatment, including FSH and AMH, reproductive outcomes and overall survival until January 2021 were investigated. Results In total, 34 girls and adolescents underwent fertility preservation before or after HSCT. Before HSCT, ovarian tissue was cryopreserved in 15 patients and two patients had oocytes preserved. Thirteen patients cryopreserved ovarian tissue after HSCT and seven patients returned to cryopreserve oocytes. Follicles were present in all tissue samples collected prior to HSCT, and in more than half of the samples collected post-HSCT. Half of the patients had spontaneous menarche or resumed menstruation post HSCT. Overall, 35 patients had survived at end of follow up and 7 patients had achieved parenthood. Conclusions Since fertility loss is common following HSCT, fertility preservation should be offered to all patients. Fertility preservation treatments can be performed both before and after HSCT. Clinical Trial Registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04602962, identifier NTC04602962
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Wikander
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Frida E Lundberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hanna Nilsson
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Birgit Borgström
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kenny A Rodriguez-Wallberg
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kristensen SG, Wakimoto Y, Colmorn LB, Dueholm M, Pors SE, Macklon KT, Mamsen LS, Nikiforov D, Cadenas J, Greve VH, Bay Bjørn AM, Rosendahl M, Pedersen AT, Nyboe Andersen A, Fedder J, Ernst E, Andersen CY. Use of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in the Danish fertility preservation cohort. Fertil Steril 2021; 116:1098-1106. [PMID: 34130800 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.05.096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the use of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in the Danish fertility preservation cohort. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING University hospitals and fertility clinics. PATIENT(S) Ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) was performed for 1,186 Danish girls and women from 1999-2020, of whom 117 subsequently underwent ovarian tissue transplantation (OTT). Subgroup 1 included 759 patients with a follow-up period of >5 years. Out of these, OTT rates were further analyzed for those patients who were alive and aged >24 years in July 2020 (subgroup 2; n = 554). INTERVENTION(S) OTC and OTT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) OTT, death, donation of tissue. RESULT(S) In subgroup 1, 14% of the patients had undergone OTT, 18% had died, 9% had donated their tissue for research, and 59% still had their tissue stored. In subgroup 2, 19% had undergone OTT and for most diagnoses the OTT rates ranged from 15% to 22% with benign hematologic diseases having the highest OTT rate (35%). On the basis of the entire cohort, stratified age analysis indicated that women aged ≥30 years at OTC were more likely to return for OTT than women aged 18-29 years at OTC; mean storage times were 3.7 and 3.6 years, respectively. Only 4% of the girls aged <18 years at OTC had undergone OTT. CONCLUSION(S) The OTT rates depended on the diagnosis, age at OTC, and follow-up time. Specific criteria are needed for reporting and comparing OTT rates. Six out of 10 patients still had their cryopreserved tissue stored and longer follow-up is needed, especially for younger girls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stine Gry Kristensen
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Yu Wakimoto
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Lotte Berdiin Colmorn
- The Fertility Clinic, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Margit Dueholm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Susanne Elisabeth Pors
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Tryde Macklon
- The Fertility Clinic, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Linn Salto Mamsen
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dmitry Nikiforov
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jesús Cadenas
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vinnie Hornshøj Greve
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anne-Mette Bay Bjørn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Rosendahl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anette Tønnes Pedersen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anders Nyboe Andersen
- The Fertility Clinic, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens Fedder
- Centre of Andrology and Fertility Clinic, Odense University Hospital and Research Unit of Human Reproduction, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Erik Ernst
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark
| | - Claus Yding Andersen
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Methods of Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation: Is Vitrification Superior to Slow Freezing?-Ovarian Tissue Freezing Methods. Reprod Sci 2021; 28:3291-3302. [PMID: 33939167 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-021-00591-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
After cancer treatment, female survivors often develop ovarian insufficiency or failure. Oocyte and embryo freezing are well-established fertility preservation options, but cannot be applied in pre-pubescent girls, in women with hormone-sensitive malignancies, or when gonadotoxic treatment cannot be delayed. Although ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) has been used to restore fertility and endocrine function, the relative efficacy of its two major protocols, slow freezing and vitrification, remains controversial. This literature review evaluates clinical and lab-based studies published between January 2012 and June 2020 to determine whether vitrification, the optimal technique for oocyte and embryo cryopreservation, preserves ovarian tissue more effectively than slow freezing. Due to limited clinical data involving ovarian tissue vitrification, most clinical studies focus on slow freezing. Only 9 biochemical studies that directly compare the effects of slow freezing and vitrification of human ovarian tissue were noted. Most studies report no significant difference in follicular morphology and distribution between cryopreservation methods, but these findings must be interpreted in the context of high methodological variability. Discrepant findings regarding the effects of cryopreservation method on follicle viability, gene expression, and hormone production require further evaluation. Early clinical outcomes appear favorable for vitrification, but additional studies and longer term follow-up are needed to establish its efficacy. Sharing data through national or international registries would expedite this analysis. However, even if research corroborates conclusions of no clinical or biochemical difference between cryopreservation methods, the decreased costs and increased efficiency associated with vitrification make this method more accessible and cost-effective.
Collapse
|
11
|
Bojic S, Murray A, Bentley BL, Spindler R, Pawlik P, Cordeiro JL, Bauer R, de Magalhães JP. Winter is coming: the future of cryopreservation. BMC Biol 2021; 19:56. [PMID: 33761937 PMCID: PMC7989039 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-021-00976-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The preservative effects of low temperature on biological materials have been long recognised, and cryopreservation is now widely used in biomedicine, including in organ transplantation, regenerative medicine and drug discovery. The lack of organs for transplantation constitutes a major medical challenge, stemming largely from the inability to preserve donated organs until a suitable recipient is found. Here, we review the latest cryopreservation methods and applications. We describe the main challenges-scaling up to large volumes and complex tissues, preventing ice formation and mitigating cryoprotectant toxicity-discuss advantages and disadvantages of current methods and outline prospects for the future of the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanja Bojic
- School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Department of Genetics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Alex Murray
- Department of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Barry L Bentley
- Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.,Magdalene College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Piotr Pawlik
- Cancer Genome Evolution Research Group, University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Roman Bauer
- Department of Computer Science, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
| | - João Pedro de Magalhães
- Integrative Genomics of Ageing Group, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mulder RL, Font-Gonzalez A, Hudson MM, van Santen HM, Loeffen EAH, Burns KC, Quinn GP, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Byrne J, Haupt R, Wallace WH, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Anazodo A, Anderson RA, Barnbrock A, Beck JD, Bos AME, Demeestere I, Denzer C, Di Iorgi N, Hoefgen HR, Kebudi R, Lambalk C, Langer T, Meacham LR, Rodriguez-Wallberg K, Stern C, Stutz-Grunder E, van Dorp W, Veening M, Veldkamp S, van der Meulen E, Constine LS, Kenney LB, van de Wetering MD, Kremer LCM, Levine J, Tissing WJE. Fertility preservation for female patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer: recommendations from the PanCareLIFE Consortium and the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:e45-e56. [PMID: 33539753 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30594-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Female patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer are at increased risk for fertility impairment when treatment adversely affects the function of reproductive organs. Patients and their families desire biological children but substantial variations in clinical practice guidelines reduce consistent and timely implementation of effective interventions for fertility preservation across institutions. As part of the PanCareLIFE Consortium, and in collaboration with the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group, we reviewed the current literature and developed a clinical practice guideline for fertility preservation in female patients who were diagnosed with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer at age 25 years or younger, including guidance on risk assessment and available methods for fertility preservation. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to grade the available evidence and to form the recommendations. This clinical practice guideline leverages existing evidence and international expertise to develop transparent recommendations that are easy to use to facilitate the care of female patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer who are at high risk for fertility impairment. A complete review of the existing evidence, including a quality assessment, transparent reporting of the guideline panel's decisions, and achievement of global interdisciplinary consensus, is an important result of this intensive collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée L Mulder
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Anna Font-Gonzalez
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Melissa M Hudson
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control and Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Hanneke M van Santen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Erik A H Loeffen
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, UMC Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Karen C Burns
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Gwendolyn P Quinn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Population Health, and Division of Medical Ethics, New York University School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Riccardo Haupt
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit and DOPO Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
| | - W Hamish Wallace
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard A Anderson
- Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Anke Barnbrock
- Division for Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunology, Department for Children and Adolescents, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Joern D Beck
- Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; LESS Group, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Annelies M E Bos
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction and Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CUB-Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christian Denzer
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany
| | - Natascia Di Iorgi
- Department of Pediatrics, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Holly R Hoefgen
- Division of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Rejin Kebudi
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey; Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cornelis Lambalk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Thorsten Langer
- Division Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Lillian R Meacham
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA; Division of Hematology/Oncology and Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kenny Rodriguez-Wallberg
- Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Catharyn Stern
- Melbourne IVF, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Eveline Stutz-Grunder
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Children's Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Wendy van Dorp
- Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Margreet Veening
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Saskia Veldkamp
- Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Lisa B Kenney
- Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jennifer Levine
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wim J E Tissing
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, UMC Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Moussaoui D, Bénard J, Yaron M, Bernard F, Adam C, Vulliemoz N, Bouthors T, Andrey V, Ansari M, Girardin C, Gumy-Pause F. Hypergonadotropic hypogonadism after ovarian tissue cryopreservation on a 13-year-old female: A case report and review of the literature. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2020; 50:102029. [PMID: 33259962 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.102029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian failure is a major long-term adverse event following gonadotoxic treatment of malignant diseases. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation can be offered in some conditions to preserve fertility. We report the case of a 13-year-old female with a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia, who presented with hypergonadotropic hypogonadism after unilateral ovariectomy for fertility preservation and before highly gonadotoxic treatment. Even though damage seemed only partial, this case suggests that the remaining contralateral ovarian function may be compromised after ovarian tissue cryopreservation, leading per se to a hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. Although indication of ovarian cryopreservation is not called into question in situations of highly gonadotoxic therapy, this procedure should only be performed after evaluation by a specialized multidisciplinary team and provided a solid indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dehlia Moussaoui
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Woman, Child and Adolescent Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Julie Bénard
- Division of Gynecology, Department of Woman, Child and Adolescent Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Michal Yaron
- Division of Gynecology, Department of Woman, Child and Adolescent Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Fanette Bernard
- Pediatric Onco-Hematology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and Adolescent Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland; CANSEARCH Research Laboratory, Department of Woman, Child and Adolescent Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Cécile Adam
- Division of Pediatrics, Oncology and Hematology Unit, Woman-Mother-Child Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Vulliemoz
- Fertility Medicine and Gynecologic Endocrinology Unit, Woman-Mother-Child Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Thérèse Bouthors
- Division of Pediatrics, Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology Unit, Woman-Mother-Child Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Véronique Andrey
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Woman-Mother-Child Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marc Ansari
- Pediatric Onco-Hematology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and Adolescent Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland; CANSEARCH Research Laboratory, Department of Woman, Child and Adolescent Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Céline Girardin
- Pediatric Endocrine and Diabetes Unit, Department of Woman, Child and Adolescent Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Fabienne Gumy-Pause
- Pediatric Onco-Hematology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and Adolescent Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland; CANSEARCH Research Laboratory, Department of Woman, Child and Adolescent Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sheshpari S, Shahnazi M, Mobarak H, Ahmadian S, Bedate AM, Nariman-Saleh-Fam Z, Nouri M, Rahbarghazi R, Mahdipour M. Ovarian function and reproductive outcome after ovarian tissue transplantation: a systematic review. J Transl Med 2019; 17:396. [PMID: 31783875 PMCID: PMC6883646 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-02149-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review study is to summarize the current knowledge of ovarian tissue transplantation and provide insight on ovarian function, fertility and reproductive outcome following ovarian tissue transplantation. Relevant studies were identified by searching through PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, ProQuest, and Scopus databases until August 2018. Ovarian function by examination of the hormonal level was evaluated, together with follicular growth, the return of menstrual cycle and assessment of reproductive consequences: pregnancy, miscarriage rates and live birth after transplantation. Studies including female patients aged between 22 and 49 years that were subjected to ovarian tissue transplantation were considered. A total of 1185 studies were identified in the primary search. Titles and abstracts were screened for assessment of the inclusion criteria. Finally, twenty-five articles met the criteria and were included in this study. In general, 70% of patients that underwent ovarian tissue transplantation had ovarian and endocrine function restoration as well as follicular growth. Pregnancy was reported with 52% of the patients. The available evidence suggests that ovarian tissue transplantation is a useful and an applied approach to restore hormonal function, endocrine balance and eventually fertility outcomes in patients that are predisposed to lose their fertility, diagnosed with premature ovarian failure (POF), as well as women undergoing cancer treatments. Identification of the techniques with the lowest invasions for follicular and oocyte development after ovarian tissue transplantation aiming to reduce probable adverse effects after treatment is indispensable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sepideh Sheshpari
- Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, 5166615739, Iran
| | - Mahnaz Shahnazi
- Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, 5166615739, Iran
| | - Halimeh Mobarak
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, 9177948974, Iran
| | - Shahin Ahmadian
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Azerbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, 537517169, Iran
| | - Alberto Miranda Bedate
- Laboratory for Translational Immunology (LTI), Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, (UMCU), Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ziba Nariman-Saleh-Fam
- Women's Reproductive Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, 5166615739, Iran
| | - Mohammad Nouri
- Stem Cell Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, 5166615739, Iran.,Department of Reproductive Biology, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Daneshgah St., Tabriz, 5166615739, Iran
| | - Reza Rahbarghazi
- Department of Applied Cell Sciences, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, 5166615739, Iran.,Stem Cell Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, 5166615739, Iran
| | - Mahdi Mahdipour
- Stem Cell Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, 5166615739, Iran. .,Department of Reproductive Biology, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Daneshgah St., Tabriz, 5166615739, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Andersen ST, Pors SE, Poulsen LLC, Colmorn LB, Macklon KT, Ernst E, Humaidan P, Andersen CY, Kristensen SG. Ovarian stimulation and assisted reproductive technology outcomes in women transplanted with cryopreserved ovarian tissue: a systematic review. Fertil Steril 2019; 112:908-921. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
16
|
Corkum KS, Rhee DS, Wafford QE, Demeestere I, Dasgupta R, Baertschiger R, Malek MM, Aldrink JH, Heaton TE, Weil BR, Madonna MB, Lautz TB. Fertility and hormone preservation and restoration for female children and adolescents receiving gonadotoxic cancer treatments: A systematic review. J Pediatr Surg 2019; 54:2200-2209. [PMID: 30773394 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2018] [Revised: 12/01/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE The purpose of this systematic review by the American Pediatric Surgical Cancer Committee was to summarize evidence from the current medical literature regarding fertility restoration and hormone replacement for female children and adolescents treated with gonadotoxic treatments. METHODS Using PRISMA guidelines, questions were addressed by searching Medline, Cochrane, Embase Central and National clearing house databases using relevant search terms. Eligible studies included those that addressed ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC), oocyte harvest, ovarian transposition, and ovarian tissue auto-transplantation for females under the age of 20. Four reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Study outcomes were summarized in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS Two thousand two hundred seventy-six studies were identified by database search and manual review and 2185 were eliminated based on defined exclusion criteria. Ninety-one studies served as the basis for the systematic review. There were 1019 patients who underwent OTC with ages ranging from 0.4 to 20.4 years old, with 298 under the age of 13. Twenty patients aged 13-20 years old underwent successful oocyte harvest. Thirty-seven children underwent ovarian transposition as a means of fertility preservation. Eighteen patients underwent auto-transplantation of thawed ovarian cortical tissue that was harvested before the age of 21 years resulting in 10 live births. CONCLUSIONS Clinically accepted and experimental fertility preservation options such as OTC, oocyte cryopreservation, and ovarian transposition are available to females aged 20 years and younger who are at risk for premature ovarian insufficiency and infertility due to gonadotoxic treatments. There is a large cohort of pediatric-aged patients, with a wide variety of diagnoses and treatments, who have undergone fertility preservation. Currently, fertility and hormone restoration experience for patients who were 20- years of age or younger at the time of fertility preservation remains limited. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine S Corkum
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Division of Pediatric Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Daniel S Rhee
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Q Eileen Wafford
- Galter Health Sciences Library, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Research Laboratory in Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles, (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Reto Baertschiger
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Marcus M Malek
- Division of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer H Aldrink
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Todd E Heaton
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Brent R Weil
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Timothy B Lautz
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Division of Pediatric Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Laparoscopic unilateral oophorectomy for ovarian tissue cryopreservation in children. J Pediatr Surg 2019; 54:543-549. [PMID: 30782317 PMCID: PMC6383797 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2018] [Revised: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Many survivors of childhood cancer will experience premature gonadal insufficiency or infertility as a consequence of their medical treatments. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) remains an experimental means of fertility preservation with few reports focused on the surgical technique and postoperative outcomes for OTC in children. METHODS This is a single institution, retrospective review of OTC cases from January 2011 to December 2017. Children were eligible for OTC if they had a greater than 80% risk of premature ovarian insufficiency or infertility owing to their anticipated gonadotoxic medical treatment. RESULTS OTC was performed in 64 patients. Median age was 12 years old (range: 5 months-23 years). Nearly half (48%) of the patients were premenarchal. Laparoscopic unilateral oophorectomy was performed in 84% of patients. There were no surgical complications. In 76% of patients, OTC was performed in conjunction with an ancillary procedure. The majority (96%) of patients were discharged within 24 hours. Median time from operation to medical therapy was six days, with no unanticipated treatments delays attributable to OTC. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic unilateral oophorectomy for OTC can be performed safely, in combination with other ancillary procedures, as an outpatient procedure without delaying medical therapy for children facing a fertility-threatening diagnosis or treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
|
18
|
Jadoul P, Guilmain A, Squifflet J, Luyckx M, Votino R, Wyns C, Dolmans M. Efficacy of ovarian tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation: lessons learned from 545 cases. Hum Reprod 2017; 32:1046-1054. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2016] [Accepted: 02/14/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
|
19
|
Chen X, Chen SL, Ye DS, Liu YD, He YX, Tian XL, Xu LJ, Tao T. Retrospective analysis of reproductive outcomes in women with primary ovarian insufficiency showing intermittent follicular development. Reprod Biomed Online 2016; 32:427-33. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2015] [Revised: 12/15/2015] [Accepted: 12/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
20
|
Female Fertility Preserving Practices at a Pediatric Unit: A Challenge of Multiprofessional and Multidisciplinary Cooperation. TUMORI JOURNAL 2015; 102:174-7. [DOI: 10.5301/tj.5000452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Being able to have children could have an important positive effect on the future lives of pediatric cancer survivors. Working at a cancer institute makes us responsible for filling the gaps in our knowledge in this area of patient care. Methods We describe our activities in a series of young females diagnosed with cancer and evaluated for fertility preservation options. We discuss the developed skills and organization as well as the practical difficulties encountered in managing fertility preservation. Results Since September 2012, laparoscopy and cryopreservation of cortical ovarian tissue has been performed in 16 girls (with ovary transposition in 3, and after several cycles of chemotherapy in 5) and egg banking in 4 young women (before chemotherapy in 2 and several years after treatment in 2). Conclusions Recommendations on fertility preservation indicate that discussing the problems early on is crucial to future success. It is unthinkable to simply provide information and offer the opportunity to choose a fertility preserving technique without helping and accompanying patients and their families in their decisions and choices on the matter.
Collapse
|