Fatal GvHD induced by PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in a patient with Hodgkin's lymphoma

Tricking the trickster: precision medicine approaches to counteract leukemia immune escape after transplant

ABSTRACT

Over the last decades, significant improvements in reducing the toxicities of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) have widened its use as consolidation or salvage therapy for high-risk hematological malignancies. Nevertheless, relapse of the original malignant disease remains an open issue with unsatisfactory salvage options and limited rationales to select among them. In the last years, several studies have highlighted that relapse is often associated with specific genomic and nongenomic mechanisms of immune escape. In this review we summarize the current knowledge about these modalities of immune evasion, focusing on the mechanisms that leverage antigen presentation and pathologic rewiring of the bone marrow microenvironment. We present examples of how this biologic information can be translated into specific approaches to treat relapse, discuss the status of the clinical trials for patients who relapsed after a transplant, and show how dissecting the complex immunobiology of allo-HCT represents a crucial step toward developing new personalized approaches to improve clinical outcomes.

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

The immune system plays a major role in preventing infections and cancers. Impairment in immunity may facilitate the development of neoplasia owing to defective immune surveillance, among other mechanisms. Immune evasion plays a significant role in relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT); one purported mechanism is through immune checkpoint signaling pathways. Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are FDA approved for relapsed classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma (cHL), primary mediastinal large B cell Lymphoma (PMBCL) and other solid tumors. Retrospective studies evaluating the outcomes of alloHCT after prior exposure to CPIs showed favorable survival outcomes but high rates of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD); the risk appears to be lower when using post-transplant cyclophosphamide as GVHD prophylaxis. CPIs have increasingly been used to prevent or treat post-alloHCT relapse. Available data, albeit limited, supports the clinical activity of CPIs in post-alloHCT relapse; however, serious and even fatal cases of GVHD have been reported. The optimal timing, schedule, dosing, and patients likely to benefit from this strategy are yet to be identified. In this review, we highlight the immune system's role in cancer surveillance and relapse prevention and discuss the current clinical evidence of CPIs use in post-alloHCT relapse.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced cutaneous toxicities: a review of histopathologic and clinical features

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent an emerging treatment option for a variety of cancer types. Through inhibition of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and/or cytotoxic lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), ICIs activate the host's immune system causing a heightened anti-tumor response. However, off-target effects of ICIs can result in numerous different immune-related cutaneous adverse events (irCAEs). Beyond impacting quality of life, irCAEs can lead to dose limitations or discontinuation of anti-cancer therapies. Correct diagnosis is necessary for expedient and appropriate management. Skin biopsies are often performed to increase diagnostic accuracy and guide clinical management. An extensive literature review was performed using the PubMed database to identify the reported clinical and histopathologic features of irCAEs. This comprehensive review primarily details the histopathologic features of various irCAEs reported to date. Clinical presentation and immunopathogenesis are also discussed in relation to histopathology.

The ocular graft-versus-host disease: the path from current knowledge to future managements

BACKGROUND

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is one of the major complications of allogenic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The manifestation of ocular GVHD (oGVHD) is variable and may involve cornea, lacrimal gland, conjunctiva, eyelid, and/or nasolacrimal duct. We reviewed and summarized the current managements of oGVHD with specific focus on the emerging therapeutic advances.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant literatures published within 20 years. Keywords used included "Graft-Versus-Host Disease", "GVHD", "ocular", "ocular surface", "ocular GVHD", "oGVHD", "dry eye", "keratitis", etc. RESULTS: Current managements of oGVHD can be classified into topical immunosuppressants, local tear-preservatory treatments, local non-pharmacological/surgical interventions, and systemic treatments. Additionally, some innovative therapies with promising treatment effects have been proposed, including topical target therapies, epitheliotrophic and neurotrophic treatments, recombinant DNase eye drops, mesenchymal stromal cell injection, and more.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical managements of oGVHD are administered in a symptom-based, stepwise manner. The advances in innovative therapies may help improve clinical outcomes, and it is essential that physicians stay updated with these novel treatment options.

Successful restoration of checkpoint inhibitors efficacy after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for classic Hodgkin lymphoma patients

BACKGROUND

Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is a highly-curable disease. However, relapses after bone marrow transplant are challenging especially relapses after allogeneic transplant.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of the institution transplant database to summarize the safety and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) use for cHL relapses postallo-HCT in patients who already failed to derive sustained benefit from CPIs received prior to allo-HCT.

RESULTS

Six cases were identified and reviewed. All patients received and failed to derive sustained benefit from CPIs and brentuximab vedotin preallo-HCT. The median age at the time of allo-HCT was 28.6 years (IQR 23.6-34.2), the median number of lines received prior to allo-HCT was 6.5 (range 5-9). The median duration of CPI therapy prior to allo-HCT was 8.1 months (IQR 6.7-12.9). The median time between the discontinuation of CPI and allo-HCT was 5.78 months (IQR 3.15-15.8). The median time to progression postallo-HCT was 5.75 months (IQR 2.6-11.7). The median time between allo-HCT and re-challenge with a CPI was 7.6 months (IQR 3.2-28.6). The median time of follow up after starting postallo-HCT CPIs was 16 months (IQR 7.25-25.75). Five out six patients responded and two patients developed GvHD.

CONCLUSION

Our report shows preserved efficacy without any new safety signals by using CPIs postallo-HCT despite using and having failed to derive sustained benefit from CPIs preallo-HCT.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant: a case series

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the setting of liver transplant (LT) pose a risk of rejection and hold unclear benefit in both the neoadjuvant (pre-transplant) and post-transplant salvage setting. In the pre-transplant setting, neoadjuvant ICIs may serve as a bridge to LT by downstaging disease burden to fit within transplant criteria. Outcomes in this setting include patients who had successful transplants without complications to patients who suffered severe complications, including fatal hepatic necrosis and graft failure requiring re-transplant. Some authors suggest having a period of three months between checkpoint inhibition and transplant may help mitigate adverse effects. In the post-LT setting, there are few treatment options if there is a recurrence of disease, which forces treatment teams to reconsider checkpoint inhibitors. Again, a longer period of time between transplant and checkpoint inhibition may reduce risk of rejection. Case reports of patients treated with ICIs post-transplant utilized either nivolumab or pembrolizumab. As combination atezolizumab/bevacizumab is a relatively new treatment option for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there are only three reported cases using this combination in the post-LT setting. While there were no cases of rejection, all three cases had progression of disease. As immunotherapy joins transplantation as a mainstay of treatment for HCC, it remains unclear how to best navigate when the treatment course involves both immune activation and immunosuppression.

CASE DESCRIPTION

Patients who had an LT and were treated with ICIs (pre or post LT) at the University of Cincinnati were included in this retrospective chart review.

CONCLUSIONS

Fatal rejection remains a significant risk even 4 years after LT. Neoadjuvant ICIs also pose a risk for acute cellular rejection; however, this may not always be clinically significant. Graft versus host disease (GVHD) may be an additional, previously unreported risk of ICIs in the setting of LT. Prospective studies are needed to understand benefits and risks of checkpoint inhibitors in the LT setting.

Construction of a Humanized PBMC-PDX Model to Study the Efficacy of a Bacterial Marker in Lung Cancer Immunotherapy

Commensal microbiome is a key factor of lung cancer immunotherapy efficacy. Elucidating the role of specific strains as bacterial markers in immunotherapy has drawn great attention from the academia. At present, most preclinical studies about the relationship between bacterial markers and immunotherapy rely on the syngeneic mouse models. However, mice differ greatly from humans in immune system and tumor characteristics. In this study, humanized mouse models based on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) immune reconstitution and lung cancer cell line-derived xenograft (CDX) or patient-derived xenograft (PDX) were constructed. The PBMC-PDX model was shown to be superior to the PBMC-CDX model in preserving tumor heterogeneity and construction time-saving. Through optimizing the experimental process, the time it took for humanized models to evaluate the effect of cancer treatment was reduced to 42 days. Next, by utilizing PBMC-PDX mice treated with antibiotics (ATB), the role of Bifidobacterium longum in lung cancer immunotherapy was studied. It was found that although both Bifidobacterium longum and immunotherapy drug pembrolizumab alone showed suppressing tumor growth, the efficacy of pembrolizumab was attenuated when administrated to mice colonized with Bifidobacterium longum. Further exploration revealed that Bifidobacterium longum caused significant changes in the proportion of human CD45⁺ cells in the PBMC-PDX model. The PBMC-PDX model has the potential to be applied as an efficient platform to support evaluation of bacterial markers in immunotherapy research and facilitate development of precision medicine targeting human commensal bacteria.

Management of relapsed cutaneous T-Cell lymphoma following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Review with representative patient case

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a potentially curative treatment option for patients with refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) through replacement of the bone marrow responsible for lymphoma cells and possibly induction of a graft-versus-lymphoma effect. However, allo-HSCT is not always curative; relapse of CTCL occurs in about half of patients post-transplant. Treatment of relapsed CTCL after allo-HSCT is challenging because post-transplant patients are at high risk of graft-versus-host disease, and this condition may be precipitated or exacerbated by standard CTCL therapies. The benefit of each potential therapy must therefore be weighed against its risk of graft versus host disease (GVHD). In this article, we review the management of relapsed CTCL after allo-HSCT. We begin with an exemplative patient whose relapsed Sezary syndrome was successfully treated without development of GVHD. We also report high-throughput T-cell receptor sequencing data obtained during the patient's disease relapse and remission. We then review general guidelines for management of relapsed CTCL and summarize all reported cases and outcomes of relapsed CTCL after transplant. We conclude by reviewing the current CTCL therapies and their risk of GVHD.

Immune cell subsets in interface cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) associated with anti-PD-1 therapy resemble acute graft vs host disease more than lichen planus

Background

Checkpoint immunotherapy is frequently associated with cutaneous immune‐related adverse events (cirAEs), and among those, the most common subtype shows interface reaction patterns that have been likened to lichen planus (LP); however, cutaneous acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) may be a closer histopathologic comparator. We used quantitative pathology to compare the immunologic composition of anti‐PD‐1‐associated interface reactions to LP and aGVHD to assess for similarities and differences between these cutaneous eruptions.

Methods

Immunohistochemistry for CD4, CD8, CD68, PD‐1, and PD‐L1 was performed on formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tissue from patients with anti‐PD‐1 interface cirAEs (n = 4), LP (n = 9), or aGVHD (n = 5). Densities of immune cell subsets expressing each marker were quantified using the HALO image analysis immune cell module. Plasma cell and eosinophil density were quantified on routine H&E slides.

Results

Specimens from patients with anti‐PD‐1 interface cirAEs showed equivalent total cell densities and immune cell composition to those with aGVHD. Patients with LP showed higher total immune cell infiltration, higher absolute T‐cell densities, increased CD8 proportion, and reduced histiocytic component. The cases with the highest plasma cell counts were all anti‐PD‐1 interface cirAEs and aGVHD.

Conclusion

The composition of immune cell subsets in anti‐PD‐1 interface cirAEs more closely resembles the immune response seen in aGVHD than LP within our cohort. This warrants a closer look via advanced analytics and may have implications for shared pathogenesis and potential treatment options.

Post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation relapse: Role of checkpoint inhibitors

Background and Aims

Despite the revolutionary effects of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in treating hematological malignancies, post-HSCT relapse is considered a critical concern of clinicians. Residual malignant cells employ many mechanisms to evade immune surveillance and survive to cause relapse after transplantation. One of the immune-frustrating mechanisms through which malignant cells can compromise the antitumor effects is misusing the self-limiting system of immune response by overexpressing inhibitory molecules to interact with the immune cells, leading them to so-called "exhausted" and ineffective. Introduction of these molecules, known as immune checkpoints, and blocking them was a prodigious step to decrease the relapses.

Methods

Using keywords nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and ipilimumab, we investigated the literature to figure out the role of the immune checkpoints in the HSCT setting. Studies in which these agents were administrated for relapse after transplantation were reviewed. Factors such as the interval from the transplant to relapse, previous treatment history, adverse events, and the patients' outcome were extracted.

Results

Here we provided a mini-review discussing the experiences of three immune checkpoints, including nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and ipilimumab, as well as the pros and cons of using their blockers in relapse control after HSCT. In conclusion, it seems that CI therapy seems effective for this population. Future investigations may provide detailed outlook of this curative options.

Is It Possible to Separate the Graft-Versus-Leukemia (GVL) Effect Against B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia From Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) After Hematopoietic Cell Transplant?

Hematopoietic cell transplant is a curative therapy for many pediatric patients with high risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Its therapeutic mechanism is primarily based on the generation of an alloreactive graft-versus-leukemia effect that can eliminate residual leukemia cells thus preventing relapse. However its efficacy is diminished by the concurrent emergence of harmful graft-versus-host disease disease which affects healthly tissue leading to significant morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this review is to describe the interventions that have been trialed in order to augment the beneficial graft-versus leukemia effect post-hematopoietic cell transplant while limiting the harmful consequences of graft-versus-host disease. This includes many emerging and promising strategies such as ex vivo and in vivo graft manipulation, targeted cell therapies, T-cell engagers and multiple pharmacologic interventions that stimulate specific donor effector cells.

Considerations for immunotherapy in patients with cancer and comorbid immune dysfunction

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been widely incorporated for cancer treatment in a variety of solid and hematologic malignancies. Multiple clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 axis inhibition in the metastatic and adjuvant settings. Due to the risks of autoimmune toxicity with these agents, stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria were employed in those initial clinical trials. These criteria led to exclusion or underrepresentation of a variety of patient populations with underlying immune dysfunction. These populations included patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases, solid organ or bone marrow transplant recipients, patients with HIV or viral hepatitis infections, patients receiving concurrent chronic steroid therapy, as well as patients who were elderly, pregnant, or had poor performance status. Thus, established guidelines on the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in these patients are lacking, and evidence to support efficacy or toxicity are overall limited to retrospective studies and case series. Fortunately, ongoing clinical trials are now including these patients and are shedding light on whether these underrepresented populations can also safely benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. In this review, we summarize the most clinically relevant available data on the use of checkpoint inhibitors in immunocompromised patient groups with a primary focus on safety.

Low-density PD-1 expression on resting human natural killer cells is functional and upregulated after transplantation

Expression of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on natural killer (NK) cells has been difficult to analyze on human NK cells. By testing commercial clones and novel anti-PD-1 reagents, we found expression of functional PD-1 on resting human NK cells in healthy individuals and reconstituting NK cells early after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Peripheral blood samples from healthy individuals and transplant recipients were stained for PD-1 expression using the commercial anti-PD-1 clone PD1.3.1.3, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled pembrolizumab, or an FITC-labeled single-chain variable fragment (scFv) reagent made from pembrolizumab. These reagents identified low yet consistent basal PD-1 expression on resting NK cells, a finding verified by finding lower PD-1 transcripts in sorted NK cells compared with those in resting or activated T cells. An increase in PD-1 expression was identified on paired resting NK cells after allo-HSCT. Blockade of PD-1 on resting NK cells from healthy donors with pembrolizumab did not enhance NK function against programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-expressing tumor lines, but blocking with its scFv derivative resulted in a twofold increase in NK cell degranulation and up to a fourfold increase in cytokine production. In support of this mechanism, PD-L1 overexpression of K562 targets suppressed NK cell function. Interleukin-15 (IL-15) activity was potent and could not be further enhanced by PD-1 blockade. A similar increase in function was observed with scFv PD-1 blockade on resting blood NK cells after allo-HSCT. We identify the functional importance of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis on human NK cells in which blockade or activation to overcome inhibition will enhance NK cell-mediated antitumor control.

Case Report: Combination Therapy With PD-1 Blockade for Acute Myeloid Leukemia After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Resulted in Fatal GVHD

Background: Azacitidine is commonly used in the treatment of relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), but the effectiveness of this monotherapy is still very low. A possible mechanism of resistance to hypomethylating agents (HMAs) is the upregulation of the expression of inhibitory checkpoint receptors and their ligands, making the combination of HMAs and immune checkpoint blockade therapy a rational approach. Although the safety of anti-programmed cell death protein (PD)-1 antibodies for patients with post-allo-HSCT remains a complicated issue, the preliminary clinical result of combining azacitidine with anti-PD-1 antibodies is encouraging; however, the safety and efficacy of this approach need further investigation. Case Presentation: We reported a case of treated secondary (ts)-AML in a patient who received tislelizumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) in combination with azacitidine. The patient relapsed after allo-HSCT and was previously exposed to HMAs-based therapy. The patient received tislelizumab for compassionate use. After the combination treatment, the patient achieved complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery, negative minimal residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry (FCM), and negative Wilms' tumor protein 1 (WT1). However, the patient successively developed serious immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and graft vs. host disease (GVHD) and eventually died from complications of GVHD. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first case to report the combined use of tislelizumab and azacitidine to treat relapsed AML posttransplantation. This report highlights the safety concerns of using an anti-PD-1 antibody in combination with azacitidine after allo-HSCT, especially the risk of GVHD, and provides a basis for future studies.

Use of checkpoint inhibitors in patients with lymphoid malignancies receiving allogeneic cell transplantation: a review

Monoclonal antibodies against checkpoint receptors or its ligands have demonstrated high response rates and durable remissions in patients with relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and other lymphoid malignancies. However, most patients will eventually progress on therapy and may benefit from further treatments including allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Furthermore, the use of checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) has emerged as a treatment option for patients relapsing after allo-HCT. The immune effects of the checkpoint blockade leading to a T-cell activation have raised some concerns on the safety of these therapies used either before or after allo-HCT, due to the potential risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Furthermore, CPI might also induce other immune toxicities, that can affect almost any organ, as a result of the dysregulation on the immune system balance. This review aims to focus on the evidence behind the use of CPI in patients with lymphoma who undergo allo-HCT. We summarize the clinical data generated to date about the use of CPI in HL and other lymphoid malignancies, the mechanisms of checkpoint inhibition in the context of allo-HCT as well as the clinical and biological observations of different GVHD prophylaxis in this setting. Furthermore, we discuss the evidence from retrospective series and early clinical trials on the feasibility and safety of the use of CPI in patients who relapsed after allo-HCT.

The Role of Immune Checkpoint Molecules for Relapse After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Immune checkpoint molecules represent physiological brakes of the immune system that are essential for the maintenance of immune homeostasis and prevention of autoimmunity. By inhibiting these negative regulators of the immune response, immune checkpoint blockade can increase anti-tumor immunity, but has been primarily successful in solid cancer therapy and Hodgkin lymphoma so far. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a well-established cellular immunotherapy option with the potential to cure hematological cancers, but relapse remains a major obstacle. Relapse after allo-HCT is mainly thought to be attributable to loss of the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect and hence escape of tumor cells from the allogeneic immune response. One potential mechanism of immune escape from the GVL effect is the inhibition of allogeneic T cells via engagement of inhibitory receptors on their surface including PD-1, CTLA-4, TIM3, and others. This review provides an overview of current evidence for a role of immune checkpoint molecules for relapse and its treatment after allo-HCT, as well as discussion of the immune mediated side effect graft-vs.-host disease. We discuss the expression of different immune checkpoint molecules on leukemia cells and T cells in patients undergoing allo-HCT. Furthermore, we review mechanistic insights gained from preclinical studies and summarize clinical trials assessing immune checkpoint blockade for relapse after allo-HCT.

Graft Versus Host Disease Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Pharmacovigilance Study and Systematic Literature Review

Background: In patients with allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are used to treat malignancy recurrence. However, ICI are also associated with graft vs. host disease (GVHD). In this pharmacovigilance analysis, we aimed to characterize cases of GVHD associated with ICI, drawn from the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database, VigiBase®, and from literature. Methods: We performed VigiBase® query of cases of GVHD associated with ICI. These cases were combined with those of literature, not reported in VigiBase®. The Bayesian estimate of disproportionality analysis, the information component, was considered significant if its 95% credibility interval lower bound was positive; denoting a significant association between GVHD and the suspected ICI. Time to onset between ICI and GVHD onset and subsequent mortality were assessed. Results: Disproportionality analysis yielded 93 cases of GVHD associated with ICI (61.8% men, median age 38 [interquartile range = 27; 50] years). Cases were mostly associated with nivolumab (53/93, 57.0%), pembrolizumab (23/93, 24.7%) and ipilimumab (12/93, 12.9%) monotherapies. GVHD events occurred after 1 [1; 5.5] injection of ICI, with a time to onset of 35 [IQR = 14; 176] days. Immediate subsequent mortality after GVHD was 24/93, 25.8%. There was no significant difference in mortality depending on the molecule (p = 0.41) or the combination regimen (combined vs. monotherapy, p = 0.60). Previous history of GVHD was present in 11/18, 61.1% in cases reported in literature. Conclusion: In this worldwide pharmacovigilance study, disproportionality yielded significant association between GVHD and ICI, with subsequent mortality of 25.8%. Previous history of GVHD was reported in more than half of cases. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03492242.

Programmed Cell Death-One Inhibition Therapy in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

The majority of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) may be cured, but for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) cHL, the prognosis is unfavorable. Immune dysfunction is a significant contributor of relapse and a hallmark of cHL; in particular, the immune system is unable to eradicate lymphoma cells that overexpress immune checkpoint proteins. The blocking of this mechanism used by lymphoma cells to evade the immune system has resulted in clinical benefits. Use of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in R/R cHL is associated with high response rates and an acceptable adverse effects profile. There is growing interest in combining chemotherapy with CPIs in frontline therapy of cHL treatment to improve relapse rates without significant additive toxicity. In this review, we discuss the current evidence supporting CPI use in R/R cHL and maintenance therapy. We present emerging CPI data in frontline adult cHL and assess its role in the elderly. In addition, we discuss critical immune-related toxicities and their management, and elaborate on the challenges of monitoring response and minimal residual disease as tools for maximizing efficacy by limiting toxicity.

The Potentials and Pitfalls of Using Adult Stem Cells in Cancer Treatment

Stem cells play a pivotal role in the developmental stages of an organism and in adulthood as well. Therefore, it is not surprising that stem cells constitute a focus of extensive research. Indeed, several decades of stem cell research have tremendously increased our knowledge on the mechanistic understandings of stem cell biology. Interestingly, revealing the fundamental principles of stem cell biology has also fostered its application for therapeutic purposes. Many of the attributes that the stem cells possess, some of which are unique, allow multifaceted exploitation of stem cells in the treatment of various diseases. Cancer, the leading cause of mortality worldwide, is one of the disease groups that has been benefited by the potentials of therapeutic applications of the stem cells. While the modi operandi of how stem cells contribute to cancer treatment are many-sided, two major principles can be conceived. One mode involves harnessing the regenerative power of the stem cells to promote the generation of blood-forming cells in cancer patients after cytotoxic regimens. A totally different kind of utility of stem cells has been exercised in another mode where the stem cells can potentially deliver a plethora of anti-cancer therapeutics in a tumor-specific manner. While both these approaches can improve the treatment of cancer patients, there exist several issues that warrant further research. This review summarizes the basic principles of the utility of the stem cells in cancer treatment along with the current trends and pinpoints the major obstacles to focus on in the future for further improvement.

Checkpoint inhibition to prevent or treat relapse in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

In the past decades, survival has improved after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) due largely to advances in the prevention of graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) and opportunistic infection. However, few inroads have been made into the problem of leukemia relapse which is the primary reason for failure of allo-HCT. The graft-vs.-leukemia (GVL) response, in which engrafted immunocompetent donor immune cells can eliminate leukemia cells, is acknowledged as the foundation upon which the curative potential of allo-HCT is based. Despite our strongly held faith in its existence, we remain unable to define GVL on a mechanistic level. T cells, in part, mediate GVL though the roles of specific T cell subsets, NK cells, B cells, macrophages remain elusive. A higher frequency of marrow-infiltrating T cells expressing PD-1, CTLA-4, and TIM-3 and other immune checkpoints have been observed in relapsed patients compared to those in remission. Studies have described the association of T cells expressing an exhausted phenotype with response to immune manipulation post-HCT. In light of these observations and the well documented activity of immune checkpoint blockade (CPB) in transplant naïve patients with hematologic malignancies, considerable interest has developed in evaluating strategies incorporating CPB to address relapse post-HCT. While checkpoint inhibitors may be provocative agents to test, they also raise concern for potential induction of GVHD and uncontrollable immune breakthrough events. This review will lay the framework upon which CPB is being utilized post-HCT, describe early clinical results, and lay out future directions.

The Role of Immune Checkpoints after Cellular Therapy

Cellular therapies utilize the powerful force of the human immune system to target malignant cells. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the most established cellular therapy, but chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have gained attention in recent years. While in allo-HCT an entirely novel allogeneic immune system facilitates a so-called Graft-versus-tumor, respectively, Graft-versus-leukemia (GvT/GvL) effect against high-risk hematologic malignancies, in CAR T cell therapies genetically modified autologous T cells specifically attack target molecules on malignant cells. These therapies have achieved high success rates, offering potential cures in otherwise detrimental diseases. However, relapse after cellular therapy remains a serious clinical obstacle. Checkpoint Inhibition (CI), which was recently designated as breakthrough in cancer treatment and consequently awarded with the Nobel prize in 2018, is a different way to increase anti-tumor immunity. Here, inhibitory immune checkpoints are blocked on immune cells in order to restore the immunological force against malignant diseases. Disease relapse after CAR T cell therapy or allo-HCT has been linked to up-regulation of immune checkpoints that render cancer cells resistant to the cell-mediated anti-cancer immune effects. Thus, enhancing immune cell function after cellular therapies using CI is an important treatment option that might re-activate the anti-cancer effect upon cell therapy. In this review, we will summarize current data on this topic with the focus on immune checkpoints after cellular therapy for malignant diseases and balance efficacy versus potential side effects.

The promise of CD4+FoxP3+ regulatory T-cell manipulation in vivo: applications for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

CD4⁺FoxP3⁺ regulatory T cells (Tregs) are a non-redundant population critical for the maintenance of self-tolerance. Over the past decade, the use of these cells for therapeutic purposes in transplantation and autoimmune disease has emerged based on their capacity to inhibit immune activation. Basic science discoveries have led to identifying key receptors on Tregs that can regulate their proliferation and function. Notably, the understanding that IL-2 signaling is crucial for Treg homeostasis promoted the hypothesis that in vivo IL-2 treatment could provide a strategy to control the compartment. The use of low-dose IL-2 in vivo was shown to selectively expand Tregs versus other immune cells. Interestingly, a number of other Treg cell surface proteins, including CD28, CD45, IL-33R and TNFRSF members, have been identified which can also induce activation and proliferation of this population. Pre-clinical studies have exploited these observations to prevent and treat mice developing autoimmune diseases and graft-versus-host disease post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. These findings support the development of translational strategies to expand Tregs in patients. Excitingly, the use of low-dose IL-2 for patients suffering from graft-versus-host disease and autoimmune disease has demonstrated increased Treg levels together with beneficial outcomes. To date, promising pre-clinical and clinical studies have directly targeted Tregs and clearly established the ability to increase their levels and augment their function in vivo. Here we review the evolving field of in vivo Treg manipulation and its application to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Multi-organ failure induced by Nivolumab in the context of allo-stem cell transplantation

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have radically changed the landscape of anti-tumor therapies in several malignancies. However the adverse events associated with immune checkpoint blockade in combination with other treatments remains to be thoroughly documented. Here we report the case of a 33-year-old male with classical Hodgkin lymphoma who was successfully treated for lymphoma but experienced serious and eventually fatal multisystem organ failure following nivolumab administration and allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Case presentation

The patient was diagnosed with stage IIIa nodular sclerosing Hodgkin lymphoma. Originally treated by chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation, he subsequently received two allogeneic stem cell transplants from matched and haplo-identical siblings upon successive disease recurrences. Nivolumab treatment was administered prior to the second allograft, after which complete remission of lymphoma was achieved (year 10), as evidenced by clinical and radiographic examination. However within the next 3 months, the patient went on to develop a constellation of symptoms affecting multiple organs, including acute pneumonia with no evidence of bacterial infection, widespread cutaneous eruptions on trunk and lower limbs, mucosal ulcerations, myositis, diarrhea and colitis. Further complications included hepatic cytolysis, acute renal failure, pancreatitis, as well as complete heart block. Some of these injuries being suggestive of graft-versus-host disease, the patient was administered immunosuppressive therapy (mycophenolate, steroids and polyvalent immunoglobulins), but died shortly afterwards. Tissue biopsies revealed extensive lymphocytic infiltration (mostly CD3 + T cells) in skin, liver, and most peculiarly in muscles, including the myocardium. Massive lymphoid-histiocytic infiltration of muscle fibers was accompanied by acute necrotizing myositis and endomysial inflammation.

Conclusions

Multi-organ failure represents a rare but potentially fatal outcome of immune checkpoint blockade in patients receiving allogeneic stem cell grafts. Nivolumab may induce atypical immune-mediated tissue inflammation and damage, such as the extensive muscular polymyositis described here in a patient with Hodgkin lymphoma. Nivolumab might also worsen GVHD symptoms in the context of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Irrespective of the actual pathological mechanisms, clinicians should be alerted to these fatal drug-related toxicities.

Significant Risk of Graft-versus-Host Disease with Exposure to Checkpoint Inhibitors before and after Allogeneic Transplantation

Investigators are using checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) to treat aggressive hematologic malignancies in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and in some patients with relapsed disease after allo-HSCT. CTLA-4 inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitors are 2 main types of CPIs, which work through activation of the immune system. On one hand, CPIs can achieve graft-versus-tumor effect, and on the other hand, there is a risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). After a comprehensive literature review, we included data (n = 283) from 24 studies (11 original manuscripts and 13 case reports or case series) and evaluated the results to assess the safety and efficacy of CPI use in conjunction with allo-HSCT. Among the 283 patients, 107 received CPI before allo-HSCT, and 176 received CPI after allo-HSCT. The most common indication for CPI use was for Hodgkin lymphoma. The CPIs used in various studies included ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab. Among the patients exposed to CPI before allo-HSCT, 56% developed acute GVHD and 29% developed chronic GVHD. Investigators reported 20 deaths, 60% of which were GVHD-related. The overall mortality risk with GVHD is 11%. In this group, investigators noted an objective response rate (ORR) in 68% of patients, with complete remission (CR) in 47%, partial remission (PR) in 21%, and stable disease in 11%. Among the patients who received a CPI after allo-HSCT for disease relapse, 14% developed acute GVHD and 9% developed chronic GVHD. Investigators reported 40 deaths, 28% of which were GVHD-related. The mortality risk with GVHD is approximately 7%. Investigators reported ORR in 54% of patients, with CR in 33%, PR in 21%, and disease stabilization in 5%. After careful evaluation of collective data, we found that CPI use both before and after allo-HSCT can be highly effective, but exposure can lead to a significantly increased risk of GVHD-related morbidity and mortality in this patient population. Despite limited availability of data, there is need for extreme caution while making decisions regarding the use of CPIs. Detailed discussions and prospective well-designed clinical trials are needed to explore this issue further.

Recommendations for managing PD-1 blockade in the context of allogeneic HCT in Hodgkin lymphoma: taming a necessary evil

PD-1 blockade is an effective therapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) who have relapsed after or are ineligible for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Although single-agent anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (mAb’s) are associated with high response rates and durable remissions, available results to date suggest that a large majority of patients will eventually progress on therapy. Many of these patients are potential candidates for allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) after receiving anti-PD-1 mAb’s, and allo-HCT remains for now the only treatment with demonstrated curative potential in this setting. However, initial reports suggested that allo-HCT in this setting may be associated with increased risk of early transplant-related toxicity, likely driven by lingering effects of PD-1 blockade. Furthermore, many patients with R/R cHL who undergo allo-HCT will relapse after transplantation, most often with limited treatment options. Here again, PD-1 blockade appears to yield high response rates, but with an increased risk of attendant immune toxicity. Many questions remain regarding the use of PD-1 blockade before or after allo-HCT, especially in relation to the feasibility, outcome, optimal timing, and method of allo-HCT after PD-1 blockade. Despite the scarcity of prospective data, these questions are unavoidable and must be tackled by clinicians in the routine care of patients with advanced cHL. We provide consensus recommendations of a working group based on available data and experience, in an effort to help guide treatment decisions until more definitive data are obtained.

Strategies to enhance the graft versus tumour effect after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Relapse of haematological malignancies after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant is a major cause of mortality. The immunological mechanisms that may lead to disease relapse may include immunological immaturity prior to reconstitution of the allogeneic immune system, tumour antigen downregulation or promotion of T-cell exhaustion by interactions with the tumour microenvironment. Current therapeutic strategies for post-transplant relapse are limited in their efficacy and alternative approaches are required. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of T and NK-cell immune evasion that facilitate relapse of haematological malignancies after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, and explore emerging strategies to augment the allogeneic immune system in order to construct a more potent graft versus tumour response.

Dynamics of Lymphocyte Reconstitution After Hematopoietic Transplantation During Chronic Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus Infection

Bone marrow transplantation is a treatment for various cancers and genetic diseases, and the only case of a cured HIV infection involved the use of this clinical procedure, highlighting the potential use of this therapy for curing many chronic diseases. However, little is known about how chronic viral infection influences lymphocyte reconstitution after bone marrow transplantation. To address this, we infected mice with chronic lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus, and performed bone marrow transplantation to assess lymphocyte reconstitution. Interestingly, we observed that adoptively transferred marrow cells exhibited preferential B cell differentiation in chronically infected mice. Moreover, donor marrow cells that were adoptively transferred into chronically infected mice differentiated into virus-specific CD8 T cells that were able to expand after PD-L1 blockade. Taken together, our data show that chronic viral infection induces a biased differentiation of bone marrow stem cells into B cells, and that exhausted virus-specific CD8 T cells generated de novo in this setting are rescuable by PD-1 blockade. These data contribute to the understanding of how chronic viral infection impacts lymphocyte reconstitution, and may provide valuable information to improve current hematopoietic transplantation regimens in chronically infected hosts.

Pembrolizumab and its role in relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin's lymphoma: evidence to date and clinical utility

Immune evasion is a critical mechanism of malignant cell survival, and relies in part on molecular signaling through the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) axis that contributes to T cell exhaustion. Immune modulatory therapy with monoclonal antibodies against PD-1 designed to enhance antitumor immune response have shown promise in the treatment of advanced solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. Classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL), a unique B cell malignancy characterized by an extensive but ineffective immune cell infiltrate surrounding a small number of tumor cells, has shown significant response to anti-PD-1 directed therapy. The anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies nivolumab and pembrolizumab have shown similarly remarkable activity in relapsed/refractory cHL and have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of this disease. In this article we review the rationale of targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in cHL and the pharmacology of pembrolizumab, and summarize the data on activity and safety profile of this agent in the treatment of relapsed/refractory cHL. We also discuss the potential benefits and pitfalls of using PD-1 blockade in the setting of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, and summarize ongoing prospective trials of single-agent pembrolizumab and combination strategies as well as future directions.

Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Hodgkin Lymphoma: An Evolving Paradigm

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is one of the most common lymphomas in the Western world. Although most patients are cured with standard first-line therapy, up to 20% of patients will have relapsed or refractory disease. Although the conventional approach to treatment has consisted of chemotherapy, radiation, and for those who relapse, autologous or allogeneic transplantation, newer approaches have become available in recent years, including immunoconjugates and checkpoint inhibitors. These approaches have shown significant efficacy in clinical trials and might be associated with fewer long-term toxicities compared with conventional therapies. In this review we discuss the biology of cHL as it pertains to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and then review the existing clinical trial results of several emerging immunotherapies in this context, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive cellular therapy. Finally, several clinical practice issues pertaining to the use of immunotherapies are discussed.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Advances in the prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and opportunistic infection have improved survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in the past decade. However, few inroads have been made into the treatment or prevention of relapse of the underlying malignancy for which allo-HCT is being performed. The introduction of US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents with significant activity in a variety of hematologic malignancies provides an opportunity to evaluate these interventions in the allo-HCT setting. Some of the most promising new agents include tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) directed at bcr-abl, kinase inhibitors targeting fms-like tyrosine kinase 3, and immune checkpoint inhibitors blocking both CTLA4 and PD-1. Data have emerged indicating potential efficacy of these agents in preventing or treating relapse, though definitive evidence remains elusive. However, potential toxicity can be considerable, highlighting the need for further clinical trials to define the therapeutic window. This review explores the immunologic and clinical consequence of treatment with both TKIs and checkpoint inhibitors in the peri- and post-allo-HCT setting.

Increased Coexpression of PD-1, TIGIT, and KLRG-1 on Tumor-Reactive CD8+ T Cells During Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) can be a curative treatment for patients with a hematologic malignancy due to alloreactive T cell responses recognizing minor histocompatibility antigens (MiHA). Yet tumor immune escape mechanisms can cause failure of T cell immunity, leading to relapse. Tumor cells display low expression of costimulatory molecules and can up-regulate coinhibitory molecules that inhibit T cell functionality on ligation with their counter-receptors on the tumor-reactive T cells. The aim of this explorative study was to evaluate immune checkpoint expression profiles on T cell subsets and on cytomegalovirus (CMV)- and/or MiHA-reactive CD8⁺ T cells of allo-SCT recipients using a 13-color flow cytometry panel, and to correlate these expression patterns to clinical outcomes. MiHA-reactive CD8⁺ T cells exhibited an early differentiated CD27⁺⁺/CD28⁺⁺ phenotype with low KLRG-1 and CD57 expression. These T cells also displayed increased expression of PD-1, TIM-3, and TIGIT compared with total effector memory T cells and CMV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in healthy donors and allo-SCT recipients. Remarkably, high coexpression of PD-1, TIGIT, and KLRG-1 on MiHA-reactive CD8⁺ T cells was associated with relapse after allo-SCT. Taken together, these findings indicate that MiHA-specific CD8⁺ T cells of relapsed patients have a distinctive coinhibitory expression signature compared with patients who stay in remission. This phenotype may serve as a potential monitoring tool in patients. Moreover, these findings suggest that PD-1 and TIGIT play important roles in regulating T cell-mediated tumor control, providing a rationale for immunotherapy with blocking antibodies to treat relapse after allo-SCT.

Fatal orthotopic liver transplant organ rejection induced by a checkpoint inhibitor in two patients with refractory, metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma

Although checkpoint inhibitor therapies have demonstrated significant efficacy in many malignancies, they have not been well studied in patients with a history of solid organ transplant. We describe two patients with recurrent, refractory, and progressive advanced fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following orthotopic liver transplantation who received programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, nivolumab, on a patient access, off-label basis. Both rapidly developed irreversible acute liver rejection shortly after starting therapy, and ultimately died. While checkpoint inhibitors clearly have tremendous potential as a targeted therapy, they should be avoided or used with extreme caution in the context of an organ transplant.

Long-term control of recurrent or refractory viral infections after allogeneic HSCT with third-party virus-specific T cells

Donor-derived adoptive T-cell therapy is a safe and effective treatment of viral infection posttransplant, but it is limited by donor serostatus and availability and by its personalized nature. Off-the-shelf, third-party virus-specific T cells (VSTs) appear promising, but the long-term safety and durability of responses have yet to be established. We conducted a prospective study of 30 allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients with persistent or recurrent cytomegalovirus (CMV) (n = 28), Epstein-Barr virus (n = 1), or adenovirus (n = 1) after standard therapy. Patients were treated with infusions of partially HLA-matched, third-party, ex vivo-expanded VSTs (total = 50 infusions) at a median of 75 days post-HSCT (range, 37 to 349 days). Safety, viral dynamics, and immune recovery were monitored for 12 months. Infusions were safe and well tolerated. Acute graft versus host disease occurred in 2 patients, despite a median HLA match between VSTs and the recipient of 2 of 6 antigens. At 12 months, the cumulative incidence of overall response was 93%. Virological control was durable in the majority of patients; the reintroduction of antiviral therapy after the final infusion occurred in 5 patients. CMV-specific T-cell immunity rose significantly and coincided with a rise in CD8⁺ terminal effector cells. PD-1 expression was elevated on CD8⁺ lymphocytes before the administration of third-party T cells and remained elevated at the time of viral control. Third-party VSTs show prolonged benefit, with virological control achieved in association with the recovery of CD8⁺ effector T cells possibly facilitated by VST infusion. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02779439 and www.anzctr.org.au as #ACTRN12613000603718.

Immune Checkpoint Blockade and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) relies primarily upon graft-versus-tumor activity for cancer eradication. Relapse remains the principal cause of treatment failure after HSCT, implying frequent immune escape, which in at least some cases, appears to be mediated by increased expression of inhibitory immune checkpoints. In an attempt to restore anti-tumor immunity, checkpoint blockade therapy (CBT) targeting PD-1 and CLTA-4 has been used in conjunction with both allogeneic and autologous HSCT. Clinical experience in this setting is limited to several small clinical trials and case series, but together they suggest that treatment with CBT can effectively amplify anti-tumor immune responses. However, intrinsic to its mechanism is also the risk that CBT in the HSCT setting may also cause significant immune toxicity. Fatal immune-related adverse events and graft-versus-host disease have been observed, but in most cases, immune side effects appear to be reversible with steroids and CBT discontinuation. As clinical investigation continues, improved understanding of immune checkpoint biology will be critical to optimize safe and efficacious treatment strategies.

Risk-adapted transplant strategies for high-risk Hodgkin lymphoma: are we there?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The treatment of high-risk classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) patients remains challenging, especially after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) failure. Moreover, the outcome of chemorefractory patients is still poor.

RECENT FINDINGS

The development of novel targeted therapies has changed the therapeutic options for high-risk patients. To improve outcome, treatment algorithms should integrate up-front, newly established prognostic markers. Tandem ASCT instead of single ASCT has been proposed as an option to improve outcome for high-risk patients. Availability of less toxic reduced intensity conditioning regimens and recent development in haploidentical transplantation have widened applicability and improved outcomes of allo-hematopoietic cell transplantation. Their exact role in cHL is still controversial and there is no consensus on the optimal transplantation strategy. In this context, results of tandem ASCT should also be compared with those of the autologous/reduced intensity conditioning-allo tandem approach. In this review, we discuss how transplantation strategies (auto and allo) can fit into the salvage treatment plan for patients with relapsed/refractory cHL, taking into account the new drugs available and integrating modern risk assessment.

SUMMARY

We speculated that improvements could be achieved by transplanting patients in earlier phases of their disease, if necessary after 'bridging' using the new drugs, and we propose an algorithm integrating the different treatment options.

Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: What Is the Mechanism in Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease?

After more than a decade of preclinical and clinical development, therapeutic infusion of mesenchymal stromal cells is now a leading investigational strategy for the treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). While their clinical use continues to expand, it is still unknown which of their immunomodulatory properties contributes most to their therapeutic activity. Herein we describe the proposed mechanisms, focusing on the inhibitory activity of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) at immunologic checkpoints. A deeper understanding of the mechanism of action will allow us to design more effective treatment strategies.

Recent advances in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), once used as a last-resort therapy, is now considered a lifesaving procedure for thousands of patients with life-threatening diseases worldwide and is frequently used early in the course of treatment for diseases destined to be uncontrollable by non-HCT therapies. Incremental advances leading to reduction of post-transplant morbidity and mortality by better control of graft versus host disease (GVHD), infections, and regimen-related toxicities, coupled with greater donor options, not only significantly increased the utilization and success of this procedure but also allowed many of these patients to enjoy healthy and productive lives after HCT. Emerging concepts in the field are now focused on the expansion of available donor options, further reduction of transplant-related toxicity, and decrease in post-transplant relapse.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in challenging populations

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including those targeting the programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 pathways, are revolutionizing cancer therapeutics. Both activity and toxicities largely stem from unleashing tumor- or host-specific cytotoxic T cells. Many patients seen in routine clinical practice have not qualified for or have been seriously underrepresented in immune checkpoint inhibitor clinical trials. Thus, a major gap in knowledge regarding the safety and efficacy of these agents persists in many populations, even after regulatory approval. To address this challenge, this review aggregates and synthesizes the available preclinical and clinical data surrounding immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in challenging clinical populations to assist both academic and community oncologists in treatment decision making. Specifically, this review focuses on the safety and activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with autoimmune disorders, organ transplant patients, patients with chronic viral infections, patients with ongoing immunosuppressant use, patients with organ dysfunction, pregnant patients, patients with brain metastases, patients at extremes of age, and patients with an impaired functional status. Cancer 2017;123:1904-1911. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Emerging treatment options for the management of Hodgkin's lymphoma: clinical utility of nivolumab

Classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL) is a B-cell malignancy comprised of pathologic Reed Sternberg cells with a surrounding immune-tolerant inflammatory milieu. RS cells evade immune recognition in part through programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) overexpression, which is genetically programmed through copy number alterations, polysomy, and amplification of the 9p24.1 locus encoding PD-L1. By engaging with PD-1+ T-cells, PD-L1 delivers a potent immune suppressive signal promoting immunologic escape of the tumor cell. Enhancing antitumor immune response by targeting PD-1 with the monoclonal antibody nivolumab has proved to be effective in multiple solid tumors, but the highest response rates to date have been reported in patients with cHL, with over 65% of treated patients achieving an objective clinical response. In this review, we will summarize the published evidence regarding the activity of nivolumab in cHL as well as its current place in therapy. We will review the pharmacology, mechanism of action, and side effects of nivolumab as well as the emerging data indicating possible increased risk of graft versus host disease in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors either pre- or post-allogeneic stem cell transplant. Given the remarkable single-agent activity and safety profile of PD-1 inhibitors in heavily pretreated patients with cHL, the possibility of employing nivolumab in combination with other active agents and earlier in therapy is a promising area of active investigation, and we will briefly summarize current clinical trials.

Advances in the pathophysiology and treatment of relapsed/refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma with an emphasis on targeted therapies and transplantation strategies

Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) is highly curable with first-line therapy. However, a minority of patients present with refractory disease or experience relapse after completion of frontline treatment. These patients are treated with salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), which remains the standard of care with curative potential for refractory or relapsed HL. Nevertheless, a significant percentage of such patients will progress after ASCT, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative approach in that setting. Recent advances in the pathophysiology of refractory or relapsed HL have provided the rationale for the development of novel targeted therapies with potent anti-HL activity and favorable toxicity profile, in contrast to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Brentuximab vedotin and programmed cell death-1-based immunotherapy have proven efficacy in the management of refractory or relapsed HL, whereas several other agents have shown promise in early clinical trials. Several of these agents are being incorporated with transplantation strategies in order to improve the outcomes of refractory or relapsed HL. In this review we summarize the current knowledge regarding the mechanisms responsible for the development of refractory/relapsed HL and the outcomes with current treatment strategies, with an emphasis on targeted therapies and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

PD-1 blockade for relapsed lymphoma post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant: high response rate but frequent GVHD

Given the limited treatment options for relapsed lymphoma post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (post-allo-HCT) and the success of programmed death 1 (PD-1) blockade in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) patients, anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are increasingly being used off-label after allo-HCT. To characterize the safety and efficacy of PD-1 blockade in this setting, we conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of 31 lymphoma patients receiving anti-PD-1 mAbs for relapse post-allo-HCT. Twenty-nine (94%) patients had cHL and 27 had ≥1 salvage therapy post-allo-HCT and prior to anti-PD-1 treatment. Median follow-up was 428 days (range, 133-833) after the first dose of anti-PD-1. Overall response rate was 77% (15 complete responses and 8 partial responses) in 30 evaluable patients. At last follow-up, 11 of 31 patients progressed and 21 of 31 (68%) remain alive, with 8 (26%) deaths related to new-onset graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after anti-PD-1. Seventeen (55%) patients developed treatment-emergent GVHD after initiation of anti-PD-1 (6 acute, 4 overlap, and 7 chronic), with onset after a median of 1, 2, and 2 doses, respectively. GVHD severity was grade III-IV acute or severe chronic in 9 patients. Only 2 of these 17 patients achieved complete response to GVHD treatment, and 14 of 17 required ≥2 systemic therapies. In conclusion, PD-1 blockade in relapsed cHL allo-HCT patients appears to be highly efficacious but frequently complicated by rapid onset of severe and treatment-refractory GVHD. PD-1 blockade post-allo-HCT should be studied further but cannot be recommended for routine use outside of a clinical trial.