Association of hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index with resource utilization after allogeneic transplantation

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Cost Associated with Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Scoping Review

This scoping review summarizes the evidence regarding healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). This study was conducted in accordance with the Joanne Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The PubMed, Embase, and Health Business Elite Electronic databases were searched, in addition to grey literature. The databases were searched from inception up to November 2022. Studies that reported HRU and/or costs associated with adult (≥18 years) allo-HSCT were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers independently screened 20% of the sample at each of the 2 stages of screening (abstract and full text). Details of the HRU and costs extracted from the study data were summarized, based on the elements and timeframes reported. HRU measures and costs were combined across studies reporting results defined in a comparable manner. Monetary values were standardized to 2022 US Dollars (USD). We identified 43 studies that reported HRU, costs, or both for allo-HSCT. Of these studies, 93.0% reported on costs, 81.4% reported on HRU, and 74.4% reported on both. HRU measures and cost calculations, including the timeframe for which they were reported, were heterogeneous across the studies. Length of hospital stay was the most frequently reported HRU measure (76.7% of studies) and ranged from a median initial hospitalization of 10 days (reduced-intensity conditioning [RIC]) to 73 days (myeloablative conditioning). The total cost of an allo-HSCT ranged from $63,096 (RIC) to $782,190 (double umbilical cord blood transplantation) at 100 days and from $69,218 (RIC) to $637,193 at 1 year (not stratified). There is heterogeneity in the reporting of HRU and costs associated with allo-HSCT in the literature, making it difficult for clinicians, policymakers, and governments to draw definitive conclusions regarding the resources required for the delivery of these services. Nevertheless, to ensure that access to healthcare meets the necessary high cost and resource demands of allo-HSCT, it is imperative for clinicians, policymakers, and government officials to be aware of both the short- and long-term health resource requirements for this patient population. Further research is needed to understand the key determinants of HRU and costs associated with allo-HSCT to better inform the design and delivery of health care for HSCT recipients and ensure the quality, safety, and efficiency of care.

Age Adjusted Comorbidity Risk Index Does Not Predict Outcomes in an Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Population

The hematopoietic comorbidity risk index (HCT-CI) is a pre-transplant risk assessment tool used to prognosticate morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Recently, the HCT-CI was updated to include an age component (HCT-CI-age). Although other studies have validated this tool in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients, it has never been studied in an autologous transplant patient population. We retrospectively reviewed 181 patients who underwent their first autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. We aimed (1) to assess whether an HCT-CI score of 3 or greater is associated with greater mean transplant hospital days, greater total hospital days, or greater risk of intensive care unit (ICU) utilization and (2) whether age influences any of these responses independent of HCT-CI. There were 136 patients with an HCT-CI score of 3 or higher and 45 with a score less than 3. The length of initial transplant hospitalization in days was not statistically significant (15.6 v 16.4 days, P = 0.38). Utilizing spline modeling prediction curves, transplant hospital days were estimated to increase from a mean of 15.5 days for a patient with 4 comorbidities to a mean of 22.7 days for a patient with 8 comorbidities. Age made no significant impact on any of the outcomes. The HCT-CI, with or without age, in an autologous stem cell transplantation did not predict length of hospitalization or utilization of the ICU. Patients with higher-HCT-CI scores at baseline may incrementally utilize more resources, and this should be explored in a larger cohort population.

Replicated Risk Index of Patient Functional Status Prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Predicts Healthcare Utilization and Survival

Poor physical functioning is associated with adverse outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Analytic tools to predict mortality in alloHCT recipients include the HCT Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) based on comorbidities and the Disease Risk Index (DRI) based on disease and disease status. We developed and replicated a risk model for overall survival (OS), early mortality (ie, death from any cause at or before day +100), initial hospital length of stay (LOS), and percentage of inpatient days within the first year post-alloHCT. In this study, we incorporated a physical therapy (PT) assessment with the HCT-CI and DRI to improve outcome predictions. The well-defined and feasible measure of functional status for assessing risk includes (1) the number of sit-to-stands performed in 30 seconds, (2) performance of 25 step-ups on the right/left side with (3) oxygen saturation recovery and (4) heart rate recovery, (5) weight-bearing ability, (6) assistance with ambulation, (7) motor and grip strength, (8) sensory and coordination impairment (eg, self-reported peripheral neuropathy, imbalance), (9) self-reported pain, and (10) limited endurance (ie, inability to complete step-ups and/or sit-to-stands). Our training cohort (TC) included 349 consecutive alloHCT recipients at Roswell Park treated between 2010 and 2016 and a subsequent replication cohort (RC; n = 163) treated between 2016 and 2019. Four of the 10 metrics-self-reported pain, limited endurance, self-reported neuropathy, and <10 sit-to-stands in 30 seconds-were identified as significant predictors and were included in the multivariable models with the HCT-CI and DRI to create a new risk index (HCT-PCDRI: HCT-physical, comorbidity, and DRI) for outcomes. Models were tested in the RC. Shorter OS was associated with self-reported pain, limited endurance, higher HCT-CI, and higher DRI. At a median follow-up of 34 months, the 3-year OS based on the HCT-PCDRI was 30% for the very-high-risk group, 54% for the high-risk group, 49% for the intermediate-risk group, and 80% for the low-risk group. The number of patients identified as very high risk increased from 55 using HCT-CI alone to 120 with the new HCT-PCDRI, whereas the number in the low-risk group decreased from 91 to 45. Early mortality and a higher percentage of inpatient days within the first year post-alloHCT (a proxy for poor quality of life and high healthcare utilization) were associated with self-reported pain, higher HCT-CI, and higher DRI. A shorter initial LOS (ie, initial low healthcare utilization) was associated with performance of >10 sit-to-stands in 30 seconds, no self-reported neuropathy, and lower HCT-CI. These PT metrics combined with the HCT-CI and DRI created the HCT-PCDRI, which resulted in more patients being categorized accurately as high risk versus low risk. The HCT-PCDRI results were replicated in an independent cohort. Pre-alloHCT PT metrics with self-reported symptoms (pain and neuropathy) were associated with survival post-alloHCT and prolonged hospital LOS. The HCT-PCDRI scoring system for risk stratification of alloHCT recipients more accurately identifies patients at potential risk of poor outcomes. The HCT-PCDRI can be tested in <15 minutes to identify patients for intervention before or during treatment to potentially improve outcomes.

Association Between Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative therapy for hematologic malignancies, but it often results in significant toxicities and impaired quality of life (QOL). Although the value of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is increasingly recognized in HCT, data are limited regarding the relationship between PROs and HCT complications. We conducted a secondary data analysis of 250 patients who were hospitalized for autologous or allogeneic HCT at Massachusetts General Hospital from 2011 through 2016. We assessed QOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General), mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and fatigue (FACT-Fatigue) at baseline. We abstracted from the Electronic Health Record (1) hospitalization during the first 100 days after HCT, (2) days alive and out of the hospital in the first 100 days after HCT, and (3) cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) among allogeneic HCT recipients. We assessed the association of baseline PROs with HCT complications using multivariable models adjusting for patient and transplant characteristics. Overall, 44.4% (111/250) of patients underwent an autologous HCT, 25.2% (63/250) received a myeloablative allogeneic HCT, and 30.4% (76/250) underwent a reduced-intensity allogeneic HCT. In multivariable logistic regression, higher anxiety (odds ratio [OR] = 1.14, P = .004) was associated with higher likelihood of rehospitalization within 100 days after HCT. In multivariable Poisson regression, lower fatigue (β = 0.003, P = .015) was associated with increased days alive and out of the hospital in the first 100 days post-HCT. In multivariable logistic regression, lower baseline QOL (OR = 0.97, P = .034), higher fatigue (OR = 0.95, P = .004), and higher depression (OR = 1.15, P = .020) were associated with increased likelihood of acute GVHD. Baseline PROs are associated with health care utilization after HCT and risk of acute GVHD in allogeneic HCT recipients. These findings underscore the potential utility of pretransplantation PROs as important prognostic factors for HCT.