Structural basis for Sfm1 functioning as a protein arginine methyltransferase

Profiling the compendium of changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae due to mutations that alter availability of the main methyl donor S-Adenosylmethionine

The SAM1 and SAM2 genes encode for S-Adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) synthetase enzymes, with AdoMet serving as the main cellular methyl donor. We have previously shown that independent deletion of these genes alters chromosome stability and AdoMet concentrations in opposite ways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. To characterize other changes occurring in these mutants, we grew wildtype, sam1Δ/sam1Δ, and sam2Δ/sam2Δ strains in 15 different Phenotypic Microarray plates with different components and measured growth variations. RNA-Sequencing was also carried out on these strains and differential gene expression determined for each mutant. We explored how the phenotypic growth differences are linked to the altered gene expression, and hypothesize mechanisms by which loss of the SAM genes and subsequent AdoMet level changes, impact pathways and processes. We present 6 stories, discussing changes in sensitivity or resistance to azoles, cisplatin, oxidative stress, arginine biosynthesis perturbations, DNA synthesis inhibitors, and tamoxifen, to demonstrate the power of this novel methodology to broadly profile changes due to gene mutations. The large number of conditions that result in altered growth, as well as the large number of differentially expressed genes with wide-ranging functionality, speaks to the broad array of impacts that altering methyl donor abundance can impart. Our findings demonstrate that some cellular changes are directly related to AdoMet-dependent methyltransferases and AdoMet availability, some are directly linked to the methyl cycle and its role in production of several important cellular components, and others reveal impacts of SAM gene mutations on previously unconnected pathways.

Intrafamily heterooligomerization as an emerging mechanism of methyltransferase regulation

Protein and nucleic acid methylation are important biochemical modifications. In addition to their well-established roles in gene regulation, they also regulate cell signaling, metabolism, and translation. Despite this high biological relevance, little is known about the general regulation of methyltransferase function. Methyltransferases are divided into superfamilies based on structural similarities and further classified into smaller families based on sequence/domain/target similarity. While members within superfamilies differ in substrate specificity, their structurally similar active sites indicate a potential for shared modes of regulation. Growing evidence from one superfamily suggests a common regulatory mode may be through heterooligomerization with other family members. Here, we describe examples of methyltransferase regulation through intrafamily heterooligomerization and discuss how this can be exploited for therapeutic use.

Tied up in knots: Untangling substrate recognition by the SPOUT methyltransferases

The SpoU-TrmD (SPOUT) methyltransferase superfamily was designated when structural similarity was identified between the transfer RNA-modifying enzymes TrmH (SpoU) and TrmD. SPOUT methyltransferases are found in all domains of life and predominantly modify transfer RNA or ribosomal RNA substrates, though one instance of an enzyme with a protein substrate has been reported. Modifications placed by SPOUT methyltransferases play diverse roles in regulating cellular processes such as ensuring translational fidelity, altering RNA stability, and conferring bacterial resistance to antibiotics. This large collection of S-adenosyl-L-methionine-dependent methyltransferases is defined by a unique α/β fold with a deep trefoil knot in their catalytic (SPOUT) domain. Herein, we describe current knowledge of SPOUT enzyme structure, domain architecture, and key elements of catalytic function, including S-adenosyl-L-methionine co-substrate binding, beginning with a new sequence alignment that divides the SPOUT methyltransferase superfamily into four major clades. Finally, a major focus of this review will be on our growing understanding of how these diverse enzymes accomplish the molecular feat of specific substrate recognition and modification, as highlighted by recent advances in our knowledge of protein-RNA complex structures and the discovery of the dependence of one SPOUT methyltransferase on metal ion binding for catalysis. Considering the broad biological roles of RNA modifications, developing a deeper understanding of the process of substrate recognition by the SPOUT enzymes will be critical for defining many facets of fundamental RNA biology with implications for human disease.

The Bacillus subtilis open reading frame ysgA encodes the SPOUT methyltransferase RlmP forming 2'-O-methylguanosine at position 2553 in the A-loop of 23S rRNA

A previous bioinformatic analysis predicted that the ysgA open reading frame of Bacillus subtilis encodes an RNA methyltransferase of the SPOUT superfamily. Here we show that YsgA is the 2'-O-methyltransferase that targets position G2553 (Escherichia coli numbering) of the A-loop of 23S rRNA. This was shown by a combination of biochemical and mass spectrometry approaches using both rRNA extracted from B. subtilis wild-type or ΔysgA cells and in vitro synthesized rRNA. When the target G2553 is mutated, YsgA is able to methylate the ribose of adenosine. However, it cannot methylate cytidine nor uridine. The enzyme modifies free 23S rRNA but not the fully assembled ribosome nor the 50S subunit, suggesting that the modification occurs early during ribosome biogenesis. Nevertheless, ribosome subunits assembly is unaffected in a B. subtilis ΔysgA mutant strain. The crystal structure of the recombinant YsgA protein, combined with mutagenesis data, outlined in this article highlights a typical SPOUT fold preceded by an L7Ae/L30 (eL8/eL30 in a new nomenclature) amino-terminal domain.

The CAR-mRNA Interaction Surface Is a Zipper Extension of the Ribosome A Site

The ribosome CAR interaction surface behaves as an extension of the decoding center A site and has H-bond interactions with the +1 codon, which is next in line to enter the A site. Through molecular dynamic simulations, we investigated the codon sequence specificity of this CAR–mRNA interaction and discovered a strong preference for GCN codons, suggesting that there may be a sequence-dependent layer of translational regulation dependent on the CAR interaction surface. Dissection of the CAR–mRNA interaction through nucleotide substitution experiments showed that the first nucleotide of the +1 codon dominates over the second nucleotide position, consistent with an energetically favorable zipper-like activity that emanates from the A site through the CAR–mRNA interface. Moreover, the CAR/+1 codon interaction is affected by the identity of nucleotide 3 of +1 GCN codons, which influences the stacking of G and C. Clustering analysis suggests that the A-site decoding center adopts different neighborhood substates that depend on the identity of the +1 codon.

Arginine methylation and cytoplasmic mRNA fate: An exciting new partnership

Posttranslational modifications play a crucial role in regulating gene expression. Among these modifications, arginine methylation has recently attracted tremendous attention due to its role in multiple cellular functions. This review discusses the recent advances that have established arginine methylation as a major player in determining cytoplasmic messenger RNA (mRNA) fate. We specifically focus on research that implicates arginine methylation in regulating mRNA translation, decay, and RNA granule dynamics. Based on this research, we highlight a few emerging future avenues that will lead to exciting discoveries in this field.

Arginine Methylation Regulates Ribosome CAR Function

The ribosome CAR interaction surface is hypothesized to provide a layer of translation regulation through hydrogen-bonding to the +1 mRNA codon that is next to enter the ribosome A site during translocation. The CAR surface consists of three residues, 16S/18S rRNA C1054, A1196 (E. coli 16S numbering), and R146 of yeast ribosomal protein Rps3. R146 can be methylated by the Sfm1 methyltransferase which is downregulated in stressed cells. Through molecular dynamics analysis, we show here that methylation of R146 compromises the integrity of CAR by reducing the cation-pi stacking of the R146 guanidinium group with A1196, leading to reduced CAR hydrogen-bonding with the +1 codon. We propose that ribosomes assembled under stressed conditions have unmethylated R146, resulting in elevated CAR/+1 codon interactions, which tunes translation levels in response to the altered cellular context.

GCN sensitive protein translation in yeast

Levels of protein translation by ribosomes are governed both by features of the translation machinery as well as sequence properties of the mRNAs themselves. We focus here on a striking three-nucleotide periodicity, characterized by overrepresentation of GCN codons and underrepresentation of G at the second position of codons, that is observed in Open Reading Frames (ORFs) of mRNAs. Our examination of mRNA sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed that this periodicity is particularly pronounced in the initial codons-the ramp region-of ORFs of genes with high protein expression. It is also found in mRNA sequences immediately following non-standard AUG start sites, located upstream or downstream of the standard annotated start sites of genes. To explore the possible influences of the ramp GCN periodicity on translation efficiency, we tested edited ramps with accentuated or depressed periodicity in two test genes, SKN7 and HMT1. Greater conformance to (GCN)n was found to significantly depress translation, whereas disrupting conformance had neutral or positive effects on translation. Our recent Molecular Dynamics analysis of a subsystem of translocating ribosomes in yeast revealed an interaction surface that H-bonds to the +1 codon that is about to enter the ribosome decoding center A site. The surface, comprised of 16S/18S rRNA C1054 and A1196 (E. coli numbering) and R146 of ribosomal protein Rps3, preferentially interacts with GCN codons, and we hypothesize that modulation of this mRNA-ribosome interaction may underlie GCN-mediated regulation of protein translation. Integration of our expression studies with large-scale reporter studies of ramp sequence variants suggests a model in which the C1054-A1196-R146 (CAR) interaction surface can act as both an accelerator and braking system for ribosome translation.

A Ribosome Interaction Surface Sensitive to mRNA GCN Periodicity

A longstanding challenge is to understand how ribosomes parse mRNA open reading frames (ORFs). Significantly, GCN codons are over-represented in the initial codons of ORFs of prokaryote and eukaryote mRNAs. We describe a ribosome rRNA-protein surface that interacts with an mRNA GCN codon when next in line for the ribosome A-site. The interaction surface is comprised of the edges of two stacked rRNA bases: the Watson-Crick edge of 16S/18S rRNA C1054 and the adjacent Hoogsteen edge of A1196 (Escherichia coli 16S rRNA numbering). Also part of the interaction surface, the planar guanidinium group of a conserved Arginine (R146 of yeast ribosomal protein Rps3) is stacked adjacent to A1196. On its other side, the interaction surface is anchored to the ribosome A-site through base stacking of C1054 with the wobble anticodon base of the A-site tRNA. Using molecular dynamics simulations of a 495-residue subsystem of translocating ribosomes, we observed base pairing of C1054 to nucleotide G at position 1 of the next-in-line codon, consistent with previous cryo-EM observations, and hydrogen bonding of A1196 and R146 to C at position 2. Hydrogen bonding to both of these codon positions is significantly weakened when C at position 2 is changed to G, A or U. These sequence-sensitive mRNA-ribosome interactions at the C1054-A1196-R146 (CAR) surface potentially contribute to the GCN-mediated regulation of protein translation.

The application of differential scanning fluorimetry in exploring bisubstrate binding to protein arginine N-methyltransferase 1

Protein arginine N-methyltransferases (PRMTs) are a family of 9 enzymes that catalyze mono- or di-methylation of arginine residues using S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM). Arginine methylation is an important post-translational modification that can regulate the activity and structure of target proteins. Altered PRMT activity can lead to a variety of health issues including neurodevelopmental disease, autoimmune disorders, cancer, and cardiovascular disease. Thus, developing a robust mechanistic understanding of PRMT function may provide insight into these various disease states and enable the development of potential therapeutic agents. Although PRMTs have been studied for nearly two decades, a consensus regarding the mechanism of action for this class of enzymes has remained noticeably elusive. To address this shortcoming, differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) was used to gain mechanistic insight into the order of PRMT substrate and cofactor binding. This methodology confirms that PRMT cofactor binding precedes target substrate binding and supports the use of DSF to study bisubstrate enzymatic reaction mechanisms.

Type I and II PRMTs regulate catabolic as well as detoxifying processes in Aspergillus nidulans

In filamentous fungi, arginine methylation has been implicated in morphogenesis, mycotoxin biosynthesis, pathogenicity, and stress response although the exact role of this posttranslational modification in these processes remains obscure. Here, we present the first genome-wide transcriptome analysis in filamentous fungi that compared expression levels of genes regulated by type I and type II protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs). In Aspergillus nidulans, three conserved type I and II PRMTs are present that catalyze asymmetric or symmetric dimethylation of arginines. We generated a double type I mutant (ΔrmtA/rmtB) and a combined type I and type II mutant (ΔrmtB/rmtC) to perform genome-wide comparison of their effects on gene expression, but also to monitor putative overlapping activities and reciprocal regulations of type I and type II PRMTs in Aspergillus. Our study demonstrates, that rmtA and rmtC as type I and type II representatives act together as repressors of proteins that are secreted into the extracellular region as the majority of up-regulated genes are mainly involved in catabolic pathways that constitute the secretome of Aspergillus. In addition to a strong up-regulation of secretory genes we found a significant enrichment of down-regulated genes involved in processes related to oxidation-reduction, transmembrane transport and secondary metabolite biosynthesis. Strikingly, nearly 50% of down-regulated genes in both double mutants correspond to redox reaction/oxidoreductase processes, a remarkable finding in light of our recently observed oxidative stress phenotypes of ΔrmtA and ΔrmtC. Finally, analysis of nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts for mono-methylated proteins revealed the presence of both, common and specific substrates of RmtA and RmtC. Thus, our data indicate that type I and II PRMTs in Aspergillus seem to co-regulate the same biological processes but also specifically affect other pathways in a non-redundant fashion.

A Family Divided: Distinct Structural and Mechanistic Features of the SpoU-TrmD (SPOUT) Methyltransferase Superfamily

The SPOUT family of enzymes makes up the second largest of seven structurally distinct groups of methyltransferases and is named after two evolutionarily related RNA methyltransferases, SpoU and TrmD. A deep trefoil knotted domain in the tertiary structures of member enzymes defines the SPOUT family. For many years, formation of a homodimeric quaternary structure was thought to be a strict requirement for all SPOUT enzymes, critical for substrate binding and formation of the active site. However, recent structural characterization of two SPOUT members, Trm10 and Sfm1, revealed that they function as monomers without the requirement of this critical dimerization. This unusual monomeric form implies that these enzymes must exhibit a nontraditional substrate binding mode and active site architecture and may represent a new division in the SPOUT family with distinct properties removed from the dimeric enzymes. Here we discuss the mechanistic features of SPOUT enzymes with an emphasis on the monomeric members and implications of this "novel" monomeric structure on cofactor and substrate binding.

Structural insight into the human mitochondrial tRNA purine N1-methyltransferase and ribonuclease P complexes

Mitochondrial tRNAs are transcribed as long polycistronic transcripts of precursor tRNAs and undergo posttranscriptional modifications such as endonucleolytic processing and methylation required for their correct structure and function. Among them, 5'-end processing and purine 9 N1-methylation of mitochondrial tRNA are catalyzed by two proteinaceous complexes with overlapping subunit composition. The Mg²⁺-dependent RNase P complex for 5'-end cleavage comprises the methyltransferase domain-containing protein tRNA methyltransferase 10C, mitochondrial RNase P subunit (TRMT10C/MRPP1), short-chain oxidoreductase hydroxysteroid 17β-dehydrogenase 10 (HSD17B10/MRPP2), and metallonuclease KIAA0391/MRPP3. An MRPP1-MRPP2 subcomplex also catalyzes the formation of 1-methyladenosine/1-methylguanosine at position 9 using S-adenosyl-l-methionine as methyl donor. However, a lack of structural information has precluded insights into how these complexes methylate and process mitochondrial tRNA. Here, we used a combination of X-ray crystallography, interaction and activity assays, and small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) to gain structural insight into the two tRNA modification complexes and their components. The MRPP1 N terminus is involved in tRNA binding and monomer-monomer self-interaction, whereas the C-terminal SPOUT fold contains key residues for S-adenosyl-l-methionine binding and N1-methylation. The entirety of MRPP1 interacts with MRPP2 to form the N1-methylation complex, whereas the MRPP1-MRPP2-MRPP3 RNase P complex only assembles in the presence of precursor tRNA. This study proposes low-resolution models of the MRPP1-MRPP2 and MRPP1-MRPP2-MRPP3 complexes that suggest the overall architecture, stoichiometry, and orientation of subunits and tRNA substrates.

The ribosome: A hot spot for the identification of new types of protein methyltransferases

Cellular physiology depends on the alteration of protein structures by covalent modification reactions. Using a combination of bioinformatic, genetic, biochemical, and mass spectrometric approaches, it has been possible to probe ribosomal proteins from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae for post-translationally methylated amino acid residues and for the enzymes that catalyze these modifications. These efforts have resulted in the identification and characterization of the first protein histidine methyltransferase, the first N-terminal protein methyltransferase, two unusual types of protein arginine methyltransferases, and a new type of cysteine methylation. Two of these enzymes may modify their substrates during ribosomal assembly because the final methylated histidine and arginine residues are buried deep within the ribosome with contacts only with RNA. Two of these modifications occur broadly in eukaryotes, including humans, whereas the others demonstrate a more limited phylogenetic range. Analysis of strains where the methyltransferase genes are deleted has given insight into the physiological roles of these modifications. These reactions described here add diversity to the modifications that generate the typical methylated lysine and arginine residues previously described in histones and other proteins.

Mechanistic features of the atypical tRNA m1G9 SPOUT methyltransferase, Trm10

The tRNA m¹G₉ methyltransferase (Trm10) is a member of the SpoU-TrmD (SPOUT) superfamily of methyltransferases, and Trm10 homologs are widely conserved throughout Eukarya and Archaea. Despite possessing the trefoil knot characteristic of SPOUT enzymes, Trm10 does not share the same quaternary structure or key sequences with other members of the SPOUT family, suggesting a novel mechanism of catalysis. To investigate the mechanism of m¹G₉ methylation by Trm10, we performed a biochemical and kinetic analysis of Trm10 and variants with alterations in highly conserved residues, using crystal structures solved in the absence of tRNA as a guide. Here we demonstrate that a previously proposed general base residue (D210 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Trm10) is not likely to play this suggested role in the chemistry of methylation. Instead, pH-rate analysis suggests that D210 and other conserved carboxylate-containing residues at the active site collaborate to establish an active site environment that promotes a single ionization that is required for catalysis. Moreover, Trm10 does not depend on a catalytic metal ion, further distinguishing it from the other known SPOUT m¹G methyltransferase, TrmD. These results provide evidence for a non-canonical tRNA methyltransferase mechanism that characterizes the Trm10 enzyme family.

A flexible cofactor-binding loop in the novel arginine methyltransferase Sfm1

Arginine methylation is a common post-translational modification and is critical for many cellular processes. Sfm1 is a novel arginine methyltransferase that contains a SpoU-TrmD (SPOUT) domain, a typical fold known for RNA methylation, but acts on a ribosomal protein. The underlying mechanism is poorly understood. Here, we report cocrystal structures of Sfm1 in complex with various ligands. We found that a critical loop responsible for S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM) binding adopts a different conformation from previous reports, and SAM appears to exhibit double conformations. Deletion of this loop greatly reduces the affinity of Sfm1 to SAM. Additionally, by comparison to closely related tRNA-methyltransferase Trm10, our structural analyses offer a good explanation why the two enzymes utilize distinct substrates, providing insights into the molecular mechanism.