Encainide disposition in patients with renal failure

Systematic and quantitative assessment of the effect of chronic kidney disease on CYP2D6 and CYP3A4/5

Recent reviews suggest that chronic kidney disease (CKD) can affect the pharmacokinetics of nonrenally eliminated drugs, but the impact of CKD on individual elimination pathways has not been systematically evaluated. In this study we developed a comprehensive dataset of the effect of CKD on the pharmacokinetics of CYP2D6‐ and CYP3A4/5‐metabolized drugs. Drugs for evaluation were selected based on clinical drug–drug interaction (CYP3A4/5 and CYP2D6) and pharmacogenetic (CYP2D6) studies. Information from dedicated CKD studies was available for 13 and 18 of the CYP2D6 and CYP3A4/5 model drugs, respectively. Analysis of these data suggested that CYP2D6‐mediated clearance is generally decreased in parallel with the severity of CKD. There was no apparent relationship between the severity of CKD and CYP3A4/5‐mediated clearance. The observed elimination‐route dependency in CKD effects between CYP2D6 and CYP3A4/5 may inform the need to conduct clinical CKD studies with nonrenally eliminated drugs for optimal use of drugs in patients with CKD.

Human variability in polymorphic CYP2D6 metabolism: is the kinetic default uncertainty factor adequate?

Human variability in the kinetics of CYP2D6 substrates has been quantified using a database of compounds metabolised extensively (>60%) by this polymorphic enzyme. Published pharmacokinetic studies (after oral and intravenous dosing) in non-phenotyped healthy adults, and phenotyped extensive (EMs), intermediate or slow-extensive (SEMs) and poor metabolisers (PMs) have been analysed using data for parameters that relate primarily to chronic exposure (metabolic and total clearances, area under the plasma concentration time-curve) and primarily to acute exposure (peak concentration). Similar analyses were performed with the available data for subgroups of the population (age, ethnicity and disease). Interindividual differences in kinetics for markers of oral exposure were large for non-phenotyped individuals and for EMs (coefficients of variation were 67-71% for clearances and 54-63% for C(max)), whereas the intravenous data indicated a lower variability (34-38%). Comparisons between EMs, SEMs and PMs revealed an increase in oral internal dose for SEMs and PMs (ratio compared to EMs=3 and 9-12, respectively) associated with lower variability than that for non-phenotyped individuals (coefficients of variation were 32-38% and 30% for SEMs and PMs, respectively). In relation to the uncertainty factors used for risk assessment, most subgroups would not be covered by the kinetic default of 3.16. CYP2D6-related factors necessary to cover 95-99% of each subpopulation ranged from 2.7 to 4.1 in non-phenotyped healthy adults and EMs to 15-18 in PMs and 22-45 in children. An exponential relationship (R(2)=0.8) was found between the extent of CYP2D6 metabolism and the uncertainty factors. The extent of CYP2D6 involvement in the metabolism of a substrate is critical in the estimation of the CYP2D6-related factor. The 3.16 kinetic default factor would cover PMs for substrates for which CYP2D6 was responsible for up to 25% of the metabolism in EMs.

Clinical significance of genetic influences on cardiovascular drug metabolism

Inherited differences in metabolism may be responsible for individual variability in the efficacy of drugs and the occurrence of adverse drug reactions. Among the cardiovascular drugs reported to exhibit genetic polymorphism are debrisoquine, sparteine, some beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, flecainide, encainide, propafenone, nifedipine, procainamide, and hydralazine. The implications of genetic differences in the metabolism of these drugs for cardiovascular therapeutics is the subject of this review.

Encainide dosing in patients with severe renal dysfunction: report of a case and literature review

Dosage of encainide for patients with lethal ventricular arrhythmias is based on pharmacodynamic effects and efficacy of arrhythmia suppression, coupled with metabolizer phenotype and extent of renal and hepatic dysfunction. Decreased clearance in patients with renal dysfunction necessitates a reduction in dosage to avoid toxic and dose-related proarrhythmic effects. This case represents a patient with severe renal dysfunction and sustained ventricular tachycardia who achieved electrophysiologically guided suppression of induced ventricular tachycardia at a steady-state encainide dose of only 25 mg daily, significantly lower than package insert or compendial recommendations for initial dosage in patients with renal insufficiency. Documented "therapeutic" metabolite concentrations correlated to electrophysiologic response. Literature review illustrates the complexity of encainide dosage in such individuals and underscores the need for therapeutic drug monitoring to individualize dosage.

The effect of renal failure on hepatic drug clearance

It is known that loss of renal function decreases the hepatic clearance of some drugs, but the mechanisms by which this occurs are unclear. Knowledge of which drugs display reduced hepatic metabolism may be important for appropriate dosing of these drugs in uremic patients. Although no firm conclusions can be made regarding common pharmacokinetic and metabolic characteristics of drugs that display decreased hepatic metabolism in renal failure, certain observations deserve consideration. It appears that drugs metabolized by oxidation, conjugation, or both may be predisposed to decreased hepatic clearance in renal failure. Drugs that undergo oxidation by the P-450IID6 isozyme may be more likely to exhibit inhibition whereas those metabolized by the P-450IIIA4 isozyme may be spared. Future studies designed to clarify the mechanisms of decreased hepatic clearance in renal failure should take into account the multiplicity of P-450 enzymes for drugs that are oxidatively metabolized. The phenomenon of reduced hepatic drug clearance in uremia should be considered when evaluating the influence of renal failure on drug disposition.

Pharmacokinetics of newer drugs in patients with renal impairment (Part II)

Cardiovascular diseases occur frequently in patients with renal failure. Any pharmacokinetic impairment in these diseases should be considered when individualizing drug therapy. The pharmacokinetics of new cardiovascular drugs in uraemic patients are reviewed: alpha- and beta-blocking agents, ACE inhibitors, centrally acting antihypertensive agents, calcium antagonists, antiarrhythmic agents and inotropic agents. Guidelines are proposed for adjustment of dosage regimens as a function of renal impairment. Renal or extrarenal elimination of drugs and their metabolites, and the activity of the latter, are taken into account. The disposition of new drugs such as flestolol, alacepril, delapril, propafenone, milrinone or enoximone, is not well documented in patients with renal failure. Further characterizations of the elimination of these compounds are needed and the potential therapeutic or toxic effects of the metabolites require evaluation to determine whether the dosage needs to be adjusted. Until such investigations are performed, those drugs should not be used in uraemic patients; if no therapeutic alternative is available, clinical controls are necessary at regular intervals. Relationships between pharmacological or therapeutic effects and drug plasma concentrations should be evaluated for such long term use drugs. The knowledge of a plasma concentration therapeutic window is important to provide information which will be useful in determining appropriate drug dosage in renal failure.

Practical optimisation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy using pharmacokinetic principles

The optimisation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy is dependent on the definitions and methods of short term efficacy testing and the characteristics of those drugs used for rhythm disturbances. The choice of an initial antiarrhythmic drug dosage is highly empirical, and will remain so until the measurement of free concentrations, enantiomeric fractions and genetic phenotyping becomes routine. However, the clinician can devise an efficient initial dosage for efficacy testing procedures based on pharmacokinetic principles and disposition variables in the literature. In this regard, a nomogram for commonly used agents and dosages was constructed and is offered as a guide to accomplish this goal. Verification of the accuracy and usefulness of this nomogram in a prospective manner in patients with symptomatic tachyarrhythmias is still required. On a long term basis, dosage regimens can be modified by the use of pharmacokinetic principles and patient-specific target concentrations, in accordance with the methods used to monitor arrhythmia recurrence and drug-related side effects.

Encainide-induced encephalopathy in a patient with chronic renal failure

A report of encainide-induced encephalopathy in a patient with chronic renal failure is presented. Drug encephalopathy has been previously reported with various agents, but not with encainide. The patient improved after withdrawal of encainide.

Encainide

Encainide is a class IC antiarrhythmic agent having little or no effect on action-potential duration or maximum diastolic potential but decreasing the maximum rate of phase O depolarization as well as increasing atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods. In intact animals or humans, encainide increases the AH, PR, QRS, and H-V intervals while not affecting the sinus node cycle length or JT interval. QT interval increases only by the concomitant increase in the QRS interval. Encainide is metabolized to O-demethyl encainide (ODE) and 3-methoxy-ODE (MODE), both of which are also antiarrhythmics with similar pharmacology to encainide. Encainide and its metabolites have little negative inotropic activity and ancillary pharmacology. Consequently, encainide has little or no effect on hemodynamic variables in patients with either normal or compromised cardiac function. The drug is well tolerated, with side effects being mainly those associated with its local anesthetic activity such as blurred vision and dizziness. Encainide is particularly effective in patients with excessive premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) and less so in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Like all antiarrhythmics, encainide may aggravate or precipitate new arrhythmias (proarrhythmia). The overall incidence of proarrhythmia is about 10%, with less occurring in patients with PVCs and more in those with sustained VT; also, the incidence of proarrhythmia is higher in patients with underlying heart disease. Encainide is also effective for the treatment of supra-ventricular arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, PSVT (both PAF as well as reentry of the nodal or W-P-W type), and ectopic atrial tachycardia. Its dosage and role in antiarrhythmic therapy are discussed.

Initial dosage selection of antiarrhythmic therapy

The success or failure of antiarrhythmic drug treatment depends, in part, on the selection of the initial dosage. Too low a dosage can lead to unnecessary (and frequently life-endangering) delays in achievement of arrhythmia suppression. Conversely, an excessively high dosage can lead to intolerable toxicity and cessation of treatment. The recommended approach to therapy is to begin with a relatively low dosage, i.e., the lowest dosage with a reasonable chance of producing a favorable response, and titrating the dose upward as needed. Dose titration should be guided by clinical response and, when appropriate, concentrations of the drug and any active metabolites in the plasma. In situations frequently encountered in practice, however, the initial dosage must be modified because of interindividual differences in drug disposition. These changes in drug pharmacokinetics can arise from a variety of factors, including disease processes (e.g., congestive heart failure, cirrhosis and renal failure), concomitant medications (e.g., hepatic enzyme inducers such as phenytoin and inhibitors such as amiodarone), drug formulation, protein binding and inherited drug metabolism capacity. Knowledge of these factors can help the clinician to avoid potential pitfalls in initial dosage selection and can enhance the changes of successful drug treatment of arrhythmias.

Overview of the clinical pharmacology of antiarrhythmic drugs

Antiarrhythmic drugs have been recognized to possess 1 or more classes of antiarrhythmic action. This classification scheme is useful, but has major limitations because the available drugs and their metabolites have multiple actions. This report presents an overview of the distinguishing features of the most frequently used agents having class I or III actions. Agents with class I actions are local anesthetic agents that depress the fast inward depolarizing sodium current and thereby slow the rate of the rise of the action potential (phase 0). This category is further divided into classes IA, IB, and IC according to the degree of potency as sodium channel inhibitors, and the individual effects of the drug on action potential, conduction velocity and repolarization. Included in the spectrum of agents with class I action are quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide, lidocaine, tocainide, mexiletine, flecainide, amiodarone, encainide and lorcainide. The antiarrhythmic drugs that exert class III action lengthen repolarization and refractoriness; included in this category are amiodarone, quinidine, bretylium and sotalol. Because of the broad range of effects that antiarrhythmic agents may exert, safe and effective therapy requires a thorough familiarity with the pharmacologic profile of each drug administered and a careful evaluation of the presenting condition and the patient history. In some cases, a multiple drug regimen may be most appropriate. Various combinations such as class IA and IB agents, have been shown to slow conduction synergistically and increase refractoriness while keeping adverse effects to a minimum.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antiarrhythmic agents in patients with congestive heart failure

Changes in the pharmacokinetics of antiarrhythmic agents may be anticipated in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), although the magnitude or direction of change is not always predictable. Factors complicating antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with CHF include both physiologic changes resulting from the disease state and unwanted effects of drug therapy for CHF. The volume of distribution is often significantly decreased (by as much as 50%) and loading doses should be reduced proportionately. Decreased blood flow to the liver and kidneys and decreased hepatic drug-metabolizing activity serve to diminish drug clearance. In some cases, simultaneous decreases in volume of distribution and clearance may result in little, if any, change in elimination half-life, despite higher plasma concentrations. Conversely, the elimination half-life of antiarrhythmic agents may be doubled in patients with CHF, necessitating a reduction in dosage. In the latter case, the time needed to reach steady state is lengthened, so that premature escalation of dosage may lead to excessive drug accumulation. In terms of their pharmacodynamics, most antiarrhythmic agents have a degree of negative inotropic effect at some concentration, and patients with reduced myocardial reserve are especially vulnerable to these effects. Some of the newer agents (such as tocainide, mexiletine, and encainide) appear to cause only minimal myocardial depression. Potential complications during therapy with all antiarrhythmic agents that are of special concern in patients with CHF include diuretic-induced hypokalemia, proarrhythmia, and possible interactions with cardiac glycosides and other drugs. Therapy for patients with CHF should be initiated with low doses of the agent selected, and the dosage carefully titrated while the patient is monitored, to confirm both efficacy and the absence of adverse effects. During subsequent outpatient therapy the patient should be carefully observed for sign of unexpected reactions, toxicity, or electrolyte imbalance.

Drug interaction studies and encainide use in renal and hepatic impairment

The effect of encainide administration on steady-state plasma digoxin levels was evaluated in 17 patients receiving stable doses of digoxin. A paired t test, comparing plasma digoxin levels (mean +/- standard error) before encainide therapy (1.05 +/- 0.14 ng/ml) and after 2 weeks of encainide, 100 mg/day (1.03 +/- 0.11 ng/ml) or 200 mg/day (1.2 +/- 0.2 ng/ml), indicates no significant (p greater than 0.05) change in digoxin levels. These results were confirmed in a second study of 10 patients with severe congestive heart failure. Also, no difference in efficacy of either drug was observed and changes in dosing of digoxin were not required. Plasma concentrations of encainide and its 2 major metabolites, O-demethyl encainide (ODE) and 3-methoxy-O-demethyl encainide, significantly increased by 31.6%, 43.1% and 35.6% after concomitant cimetidine administration in 13 healthy adult men receiving 75 mg/day of encainide. However, a retrospective evaluation of 33 patients receiving both drugs did not reveal any clinically significant interactions. Retrospective evaluation of patients enrolled in clinical studies who received concomitant digoxin (268), antiarrhythmics (118), anticoagulants (78), antidiabetics (40), antipsychotics (23), beta blockers (88), calcium-channel blockers (24) or diuretics (229) did not reveal any clinically significant interactions with encainide. Similarly, in vitro protein binding studies did not reveal any clinically significant interactions with encainide or its major metabolites. Six patients with moderate to severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance 10 to 38 ml/min) received 25 mg of encainide, 3 times/day, for 7 doses. Plasma encainide, ODE and 3-methoxy-O-demethyl concentrations were similar to those observed in normal subjects who had received twice the dose of encainide, and steady-state apparent oral clearance of encainide was reduced by 66% with renal impairment. Based on these data it is recommended that in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment encainide be initiated at one-third the normal dose, or 25 mg once a day. Doses may be elevated in small increments at 1-week intervals if needed for efficacy. The effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of encainide was studied in 7 patients with clinically documented cirrhosis. Compared with normal subjects studied using a similar protocol, the plasma concentrations of encainide were elevated significantly due to a 6-fold decrease in oral clearance. However, since plasma concentrations of the active metabolite ODE were correspondingly lower, specific encainide dosing instructions for patients with hepatic impairment are not indicated.