1
|
Blake C, Lai R, Brown T, Pelecanos A, Moroney L, Helios J, Smith D, Hughes BGM, Kenny L, Chua B, Bauer J. Nutrition outcomes and treatment toxicities in patients with head and neck cancer receiving helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy. J Hum Nutr Diet 2024; 37:182-192. [PMID: 37737485 DOI: 10.1111/jhn.13243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (H-IMRT) provides excellent limitation of dose to tissues not requiring treatment, although acute toxicity still occurs. The present study aimed to determine how treatment-related acute toxicities affect nutrition outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS A prospective observational study was conducted in 194 patients undergoing curative intent H-IMRT with or without other treatment modalities. Weight outcomes (kg) and acute toxicity and dysphagia data were collected during treatment using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE), version 4.0. RESULTS Significant weight loss (> 10%) was observed in 30% of high nutritional risk patients and 7% of low nutritional risk patients. Nausea, adjusted for baseline dysphagia, in high nutritional risk patients and nausea, dysphagia and pharyngeal mucositis in low nutritional risk patients were significant factors in explaining the percentage loss in baseline weight to treatment completion. CONCLUSIONS Significant weight loss remains an issue during treatment, despite improvements in radiotherapy technology and high-level multidisciplinary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Blake
- Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Rainbow Lai
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Teresa Brown
- Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Anita Pelecanos
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Laura Moroney
- Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- School of Health & Rehabilitation Sci, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Jennifer Helios
- Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - David Smith
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Brett G M Hughes
- Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Lizbeth Kenny
- Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Benjamin Chua
- Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Judith Bauer
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Culié D, Schiappa R, Pace-Loscos T, Guelfucci B, Vergez S, Garrel R, Fakhry N, Dassonville O, Poissonnet G, Lallemant B, Sudaka A, Saada-Bouzid E, Benezery K, Temam S, Gorphe P, Chamorey E, Bozec A. Enteral Nutrition during Radiotherapy for Oropharyngeal Cancers: Prevalence and Prognostic Factors Based on HPV Status (A GETTEC Study). J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12093169. [PMID: 37176609 PMCID: PMC10179627 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12093169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Nutritional support during radiotherapy is crucial to tolerating and completing oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) treatment. The impact of HPV status on nutritional support is debated. The objective was to evaluate the rate of Reactive Feeding Tube (RFT) use and determine its prognostic factors during definitive radiotherapy for OPSCC. All OPSCC patients treated from 2009 to 2014 were included in this multicentric retrospective study. The impact of tumor p16 status on the risk of RFT was assessed through multivariate analyses. Among the 543 patients, 103 patients required an RFT (19.0%). The use of RFT differed between centers (5% to 32.4%). In multivariate analysis, only tongue base involvement and concurrent chemotherapy were significantly associated with RFT (OR = 2.18 and 3.7, respectively). Tongue base involvement and concomitant chemotherapy were prognostic factors for RFT. HPV status was not a prognostic factor for enteral nutrition during radiotherapy for OPSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorian Culié
- Antoine Lacassagne Centre, University Institute of the Face and Neck, Côte d'Azur University, 06000 Nice, France
- Antoine Lacassagne Centre, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Data, Côte d'Azur University, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Renaud Schiappa
- Antoine Lacassagne Centre, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Data, Côte d'Azur University, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Tanguy Pace-Loscos
- Antoine Lacassagne Centre, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Data, Côte d'Azur University, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Bruno Guelfucci
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sainte Musse Hospital, 83100 Toulon, France
| | - Sebastien Vergez
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Cancer University Institute of Toulouse, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - Renaud Garrel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Montpellier, 34295 Montpellier, France
| | - Nicolas Fakhry
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Public Assistance-Hospitals of Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Olivier Dassonville
- Antoine Lacassagne Centre, University Institute of the Face and Neck, Côte d'Azur University, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Gilles Poissonnet
- Antoine Lacassagne Centre, University Institute of the Face and Neck, Côte d'Azur University, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Benjamin Lallemant
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Nîmes, 30900 Nîmes, France
| | - Anne Sudaka
- Antoine Lacassagne Centre, Department of Pathology, Côte d'Azur University, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Esma Saada-Bouzid
- Antoine Lacassagne Centre, Department of Medical Oncology, Côte d'Azur University, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Karen Benezery
- Antoine Lacassagne Centre, Department of Radiotherapy, Côte d'Azur University, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Stephane Temam
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Gustave Roussy Institute, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Phillipe Gorphe
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Gustave Roussy Institute, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Emmanuel Chamorey
- Antoine Lacassagne Centre, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Data, Côte d'Azur University, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Alexandre Bozec
- Antoine Lacassagne Centre, University Institute of the Face and Neck, Côte d'Azur University, 06000 Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Blake CL, Brown TE, Pelecanos A, Moroney LB, Helios J, Hughes BGM, Chua B, Kenny LM. Enteral nutrition support and treatment toxicities in patients with head and neck cancer receiving definitive or adjuvant helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy. Head Neck 2023; 45:417-430. [PMID: 36433667 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enteral nutrition (EN) is often required in patients with head and neck cancer (HNSCC); however, initiation criteria is limited or inconsistent. This study aimed to describe the relationship of treatment toxicities and requirement for EN and investigate toxicity and baseline characteristics association with EN duration. METHODS Acute toxicities and baseline characteristics were collected from patients with HNSCC (n = 110) undergoing H-IMRT. Percentage EN contributing to estimated requirements and EN duration were measured. RESULTS The threshold for patients needing ≥50% of estimated requirements via EN increased from week 3 to 4 for grade ≥2 oral/pharyngeal mucositis, dysgeusia, thick saliva and nausea, and for grade 3 dysphagia. Patients with grade 2-3 dysphagia had a reduced risk of ceasing EN compared to those with grade 0-1 dysphagia. CONCLUSIONS Using acute toxicities in clinical practice may be a useful tool to inform prompt initiation of EN prior to decline in nutritional status and anticipate EN duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire L Blake
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Teresa E Brown
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Anita Pelecanos
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Laura B Moroney
- Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jennifer Helios
- Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Brett G M Hughes
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Benjamin Chua
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Lizbeth M Kenny
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Malnutrition, nutrition support and dietary intervention: the role of the dietitian supporting patients with head and neck cancer. Br Dent J 2022; 233:757-764. [DOI: 10.1038/s41415-022-5107-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
AbstractMalnutrition is prevalent in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) at diagnosis but can occur at any stage of the treatment pathway. The impact of disease burden and treatment side effects can lead to altered anatomy, compromised quality and quantity of saliva and impaired swallowing function, which can result in deleterious effects on nutritional status. Optimising nutrition status is critical, as malnutrition is adversely associated with treatment tolerance and outcomes, wound healing, morbidity, mortality, quality of life and survival. Dietitians are integral members of the HNC multidisciplinary team and are uniquely qualified in the assessment, management and optimisation of nutritional status across the care pathway. This includes providing informational counselling to patients and carers on the short- and long-term nutritional impact of planned treatments alongside multidisciplinary members. Dietitians lead on the recommendation, provision and monitoring of nutrition support, which can be via the oral, enteral or parenteral route. Oral nutrition support includes dietary counselling, nourishing dietary, food fortification advice and high energy/protein oral nutritional supplements. Enteral nutrition support, or tube feeding, can be required on a short- and/or long-term basis and dietitians support appropriate decision-making for the type of tube and timing of placement across the care pathway.
Collapse
|
5
|
Edwards A, Brown T, Hughes BGM, Bauer J. The changing face of head and neck cancer: are patients with human papillomavirus-positive disease at greater nutritional risk? A systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:7191-7204. [PMID: 35477809 PMCID: PMC9385807 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07056-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Human papillomavirus (HPV) is now the primary cause of oropharyngeal head and neck cancer (OPC) worldwide; yet limited research has examined the effect of HPV-positive status (OPC+) on nutrition outcomes. This study aims to determine the impact of HPV status on nutritional outcomes for adult patients with OPC undergoing any treatment modality. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted up to and including July 2021 of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Web of Science to identify studies conducted in adults (>18 years) with known OPC reporting on any outcome(s) related to nutrition, according to HPV status (OPC+ versus OPC-). Bias was assessed using QUIPS tool, with certainty of evidence assessed using GRADE system. RESULTS Six studies (total n = 635) all at moderate-high risk of bias were included. Three studies reported on weight change (n = 255), three feeding tube dependency (n = 380), three feeding tube timing of placement (prophylactic or reactive) and/or utilisation (n = 255), two nutritional (energy and/or protein) intake (n = 230), and one nutritional status (n = 83). Patients with OPC+ may experience greater weight loss, may have higher utilisation of reactive feeding tubes (both GRADE low certainty, downgraded due to serious bias and imprecision), and may have lower feeding tube dependency rates (GRADE low certainty, downgraded due to serious bias and inconsistency) versus OPC- . It is uncertain whether nutritional intake and nutritional status differed between populations (GRADE very low certainty, downgraded due to serious bias and very serious imprecision). CONCLUSION Further, high-quality research is needed to understand optimal nutritional care practices for patients with OPC + to achieve positive health outcomes into survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Edwards
- School of Human Movements and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
- Nutrition & Dietetics, Toowoomba Hospital, Darling Downs Health, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia.
- Nutrition & Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| | - Teresa Brown
- School of Human Movements and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Nutrition & Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Brett G M Hughes
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Judy Bauer
- School of Human Movements and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Nutrition, Dietetics & Food, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash Health, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Blake C, Edwards A, Treleaven E, Brown T, Hughes B, Lin C, Kenny L, Banks M, Bauer J. Evaluation of a novel pre-treatment model of nutrition care for patients with head and neck cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy. Nutr Diet 2021; 79:206-216. [PMID: 34854199 DOI: 10.1111/1747-0080.12714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Weight loss and malnutrition occur frequently in patients with head and neck cancer and are associated with reduced survival. This pragmatic study aimed to determine the effect of a novel pre-treatment model of nutrition care on nutrition outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy. METHODS This health service evaluation consisted of an evaluation of the new model of care implementation (Phase 1) and an evaluation of patient outcomes (Phase 2) in pre- and post-implementation cohorts (n = 64 and n = 47, respectively). All Phase 2 patients received a prophylactic gastrostomy. The new model of care consisted of dietary counselling and commencement of proactive supplementary enteral nutrition via a prophylactic gastrostomy, in addition to normal oral intake, prior to treatment commencement. Nutrition outcomes were collected at baseline (pre-treatment) and 3 months post-radiotherapy completion. RESULTS The new model of care was successfully incorporated into practice with high referral (96.5%) and attendance (91.5%) rates to the counselling session, and high adherence rates to proactive tube feeding (80.9%). Patients in the post-implementation cohort had less weight-loss (1.2%; p = 0.338) and saw less of a decline in nutritional status compared to patients in the pre-implementation cohort (23% vs. 30%, respectively; p = 0.572), deemed clinically important. However, patients still experienced critical weight loss overall (mean 9.9%). CONCLUSION Pre-treatment nutrition care was feasible in standard clinical practice and demonstrated clinically relevant outcome improvements for patients. Future high-quality research is warranted to investigate further multidisciplinary strategies to attenuate weight-loss further, inclusive of patient-reported barriers and enablers to nutrition interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Blake
- Nutrition & Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Anna Edwards
- Nutrition & Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,The School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Nutrition & Dietetics, Toowoomba Hospital, Darling Downs Health, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Elise Treleaven
- Nutrition & Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Teresa Brown
- Nutrition & Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,The School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Brett Hughes
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,The School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Charles Lin
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,The School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Lizbeth Kenny
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,The School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Merrilyn Banks
- Nutrition & Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,The School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Judy Bauer
- Nutrition & Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,The School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Willemsen ACH, Kok A, Baijens LWJ, de Boer JP, de Bree R, Devriese LA, Driessen CML, van Herpen CML, Hoebers FJP, Kaanders JHAM, Karsten RT, van Kuijk SMJ, Lalisang RI, Navran A, Pereboom SR, Schols AMWJ, Terhaard CHJ, Hoeben A. Development and external validation of a prediction model for tube feeding dependency for at least four weeks during chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Clin Nutr 2021; 41:177-185. [PMID: 34883306 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Patients who receive chemoradiotherapy or bioradiotherapy (CRT/BRT) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC) often experience high toxicity rates interfering with oral intake, causing tube feeding (TF) dependency. International guidelines recommend gastrostomy insertion when the expected use of TF exceeds 4 weeks. We aimed to develop and externally validate a prediction model to identify patients who need TF ≥ 4 weeks and would benefit from prophylactic gastrostomy insertion. METHODS A retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed in four tertiary head and neck cancer centers in the Netherlands. The prediction model was developed using data from University Medical Center Utrecht and the Netherlands Cancer Institute and externally validated using data from Maastricht University Medical Center and Radboud University Medical Center. The primary endpoint was TF dependency ≥4 weeks initiated during CRT/BRT or within 30 days after CRT/BRT completion. Potential predictors were extracted from electronic health records and radiotherapy dose-volume parameters were calculated. RESULTS The developmental and validation cohort included 409 and 334 patients respectively. Multivariable analysis showed predictive value for pretreatment weight change, texture modified diet at baseline, ECOG performance status, tumor site, N classification, mean radiation dose to the contralateral parotid gland and oral cavity. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for this model was 0.73 and after external validation 0.62. Positive and negative predictive value for a risk of 90% or higher for TF dependency ≥4 weeks were 81.8% and 42.3% respectively. CONCLUSIONS We developed and externally validated a prediction model to estimate TF-dependency ≥4 weeks in LAHNSCC patients treated with CRT/BRT. This model can be used to guide personalized decision-making on prophylactic gastrostomy insertion in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna C H Willemsen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands; GROW-School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Department of Respiratory Medicine, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Annemieke Kok
- Department of Dietetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Laura W J Baijens
- GROW-School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Paul de Boer
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Remco de Bree
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Lot A Devriese
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Chantal M L Driessen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Carla M L van Herpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Frank J P Hoebers
- GROW-School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, MAASTRO Clinic, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes H A M Kaanders
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Rebecca T Karsten
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sander M J van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Roy I Lalisang
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands; GROW-School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Arash Navran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Susanne R Pereboom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Annemie M W J Schols
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Chris H J Terhaard
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ann Hoeben
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands; GROW-School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Emmons D. Reducing outpatient gastrostomy tube complications. Nutr Clin Pract 2021; 37:351-360. [PMID: 34101264 DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To monitor the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary education protocol for gastrostomy tube (GT) use and care for patients to reduce complications postplacement. METHODS Baseline assessment included a preintervention/intervention design through quantitative measures to determine reduction in the number of GT complications postprocedure following implementation of a patient education protocol for 16 patients in the study. INTERVENTION A multidisciplinary approach was used in protocol development for standardizing patient education. Verbal, written, and hands-on demonstration methods for GT care were used to provide multiple education pathways to increase patient knowledge. Over the progression of 8 months (July 2019 to March 2020), patients with a new GT were followed postprocedure (1-2 weeks prior to starting radiation treatments) and throughout their course of radiation treatments (typically 6-7 weeks). RESULTS All 16 patients (100%) in the intervention group were included in the final analysis. GT complications were reduced from 91% in the preintervention group (n = 11) to 37% in the intervention group (n = 16). The most significant reduction occurred in technique issues, which decreased from 36% (n = 4) to 0%. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of a multidisciplinary approach with multiple educational sessions prior to GT placement and use led to increased patient knowledge and reduced GT complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deanna Emmons
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Elkhart General Hospital, Beacon Health System, Elkhart, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Baijens LWJ, Walshe M, Aaltonen LM, Arens C, Cordier R, Cras P, Crevier-Buchman L, Curtis C, Golusinski W, Govender R, Eriksen JG, Hansen K, Heathcote K, Hess MM, Hosal S, Klussmann JP, Leemans CR, MacCarthy D, Manduchi B, Marie JP, Nouraei R, Parkes C, Pflug C, Pilz W, Regan J, Rommel N, Schindler A, Schols AMWJ, Speyer R, Succo G, Wessel I, Willemsen ACH, Yilmaz T, Clavé P. European white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 278:577-616. [PMID: 33341909 PMCID: PMC7826315 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06507-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To develop a European White Paper document on oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) in head and neck cancer (HNC). There are wide variations in the management of OD associated with HNC across Europe. Methods Experts in the management of specific aspects of OD in HNC across Europe were delegated by their professional medical and multidisciplinary societies to contribute to this document. Evidence is based on systematic reviews, consensus-based position statements, and expert opinion. Results Twenty-four sections on HNC-specific OD topics. Conclusion This European White Paper summarizes current best practice on management of OD in HNC, providing recommendations to support patients and health professionals. The body of literature and its level of evidence on diagnostics and treatment for OD in HNC remain poor. This is in the context of an expected increase in the prevalence of OD due to HNC in the near future. Contributing factors to increased prevalence include aging of our European population (including HNC patients) and an increase in human papillomavirus (HPV) related cancer, despite the introduction of HPV vaccination in various countries. We recommend timely implementation of OD screening in HNC patients while emphasizing the need for robust scientific research on the treatment of OD in HNC. Meanwhile, its management remains a challenge for European professional associations and policymakers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura W J Baijens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. .,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Margaret Walshe
- Department of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Leena-Maija Aaltonen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Christoph Arens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Reinie Cordier
- Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,School of Occupational Therapy, Social Work and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Patrick Cras
- Department of Neurology, Born Bunge Institute, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lise Crevier-Buchman
- Voice, Speech, Swallowing Lab, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital UVSQ and Research lab CNRS-UMR7018, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France
| | - Chris Curtis
- Swallows Head and Neck Cancer Charity, Blackpool, UK
| | - Wojciech Golusinski
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - Roganie Govender
- Head and Neck Cancer Centre, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jesper Grau Eriksen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kevin Hansen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kate Heathcote
- Robert White Centre for Airway, Voice and Swallow, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dorset, UK
| | - Markus M Hess
- Deutsche Stimmklinik, Hamburg, Germany.,Departement of Voice, Speech and Hearing Disorders, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sefik Hosal
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Atılım University, Medicana International Ankara, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Jens Peter Klussmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - C René Leemans
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Denise MacCarthy
- Division of Restorative Dentistry and Periodontology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Beatrice Manduchi
- Department of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jean-Paul Marie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Reza Nouraei
- Department of Ear Nose and Throat Surgery, The Robert White Centre for Airway Voice and Swallowing, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Claire Parkes
- Department of Speech and Language Therapy, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Christina Pflug
- Departement of Voice, Speech and Hearing Disorders, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Walmari Pilz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,MHeNs School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Julie Regan
- Department of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nathalie Rommel
- Department Neurosciences, Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, Deglutology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Antonio Schindler
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Annemie M W J Schols
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Renee Speyer
- Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,School of Occupational Therapy, Social Work and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Faculty of Health, School of Health and Social Development, Victoria, Australia
| | - Giovanni Succo
- Head and Neck Oncology Service, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy.,Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Irene Wessel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anna C H Willemsen
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Respiratory Medicine, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Taner Yilmaz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Pere Clavé
- Gastrointestinal Physiology Laboratory, Hospital de Mataró, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Mataró, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Prediction model for tube feeding dependency during chemoradiotherapy for at least four weeks in head and neck cancer patients: A tool for prophylactic gastrostomy decision making. Clin Nutr 2020; 39:2600-2608. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.11.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
11
|
Sunuwar DR, Singh DR, Pradhan PMS. Prevalence and factors associated with double and triple burden of malnutrition among mothers and children in Nepal: evidence from 2016 Nepal demographic and health survey. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:405. [PMID: 32223749 PMCID: PMC7104542 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-8356-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malnutrition in mothers and children is a significant public health challenge in developing countries such as Nepal. Although undernutrition in children has been gradually decreasing, the coexistence of various forms of malnutrition in mothers and children has continued to rise globally. There is a gap in knowledge of the coexistence of such multiple burdens of malnutrition in the Nepalese context. The aims of this study were to explore the coexistence of various forms of malnutrition and associated factors among mother-child pairs residing in the same household. METHODS A total sample of 2261 mother-child pairs from the Nepal Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) 2016 were included in the study. Anthropometric measurements and hemoglobin levels of children and anthropometric measurements of their mothers were collected. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the factors associated with the double burden of malnutrition (DBM) and the triple burden of malnutrition (TBM). RESULTS Prevalence of DBM and TBM was 6.60% (95% CI: 5.13-8.84) and 7.00% (95% CI: 5.42-8.99) respectively in the same households. In the adjusted multivariable logistic regression models, mothers with short stature (AOR = 4.18, 95% CI: 2.04-8.52), from the richest wealth quintile (AOR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.17-5.15), aged over 35 years (AOR = 3.08, 95% CI: 1.20-7.86), and those who had achieved at least secondary level education (AOR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.03-4.07) were more likely to suffer from the DBM. Similarly, mothers with short stature (AOR = 5.01, 95% CI: 2.45-10.24), from the richest wealth quintile (AOR = 2.66, 95% CI: 1.28-5.54), aged over 35 years (AOR = 3.41, 95% CI: 1.26-9.17), and those who had achieved at least secondary level education (AOR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.00-4.18) were more likely to suffer from the TBM. CONCLUSIONS Overall, there is a low prevalence of double and triple burden of malnutrition among mother-child pairs in Nepal. Older mothers with short stature and those from richer wealth quintiles were more likely to suffer from double and triple burden of malnutrition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dev Ram Sunuwar
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Nepal APF Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
- Department of Public Health, Asian College for Advance Studies, Purbanchal University, Lalitpur, Nepal.
| | - Devendra Raj Singh
- Department of Public Health, Asian College for Advance Studies, Purbanchal University, Lalitpur, Nepal
- Southeast Asia Development Actions Network (SADAN), Lalitpur, Nepal
| | - Pranil Man Singh Pradhan
- Department of Community Medicine, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
McGrath KH, Hardikar W. Gastrostomy tube use in children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27702. [PMID: 30854790 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2018] [Revised: 02/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Children with cancer are at risk of malnutrition, which can impair critical childhood processes of growth and development and contribute to poor health outcomes. Enteral nutrition can effectively ameliorate malnutrition or weight loss in children with cancer; however, published nutrition support algorithms contain minimal specific information on gastrostomy tube use, and current literature is limited. Decisions about gastrostomy tube insertion in children with cancer can be challenging. Consideration of gastrostomy tube insertion is only appropriate in children with long-term dependence on enteral nutrition, particularly when nasogastric tube insertion is predicted or proven to be problematic. Specific indications for patient selection are unclear, and referring clinicians may be unaware of important absolute and relative contraindications. Complications are predominantly minor in nature; however, reported rates are high. Morbidity must be weighed carefully against the need and anticipated duration of enteral nutrition support, and further research in this area is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen H McGrath
- Department of Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Intestinal Failure and Clinical Nutrition Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Winita Hardikar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Brown T, Banks M, Hughes BG, Lin C, Kenny LM, Bauer JD. Impact of early prophylactic feeding on long term tube dependency outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol 2017; 72:17-25. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2017] [Accepted: 06/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
14
|
Gastrostomy in the era of minimally invasive head and neck cancer surgery. Laryngoscope 2017; 128:847-851. [DOI: 10.1002/lary.26829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2017] [Revised: 06/21/2017] [Accepted: 07/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
15
|
Brown T, Banks M, Hughes BGM, Lin C, Kenny L, Bauer J. Tube feeding during treatment for head and neck cancer - Adherence and patient reported barriers. Oral Oncol 2017; 72:140-149. [PMID: 28797450 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Revised: 07/14/2017] [Accepted: 07/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The main aim was to investigate the incidence of patient adherence to nutritional tube feeding recommendations in patients with head and neck cancer and to determine patient barriers to meeting tube feeding prescription. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was an observational study from a randomised controlled trial in patients with head and neck cancer deemed at high nutritional risk with prophylactic gastrostomy (n=125). Patients were randomised to receive early tube feeding prior to treatment (intervention group) or standard care. All patients in the intervention and standard care groups then commenced clinical tube feeding as required during treatment. Patients maintained a daily record of gastrostomy intake, main nutrition impact symptom necessitating gastrostomy use, and reasons for not meeting nutrition prescription. Adherence was defined as meeting ≥75% of total prescribed intake. RESULTS Patients were predominantly male (89%), median age 60, with oropharyngeal tumours (78%), stage IV disease (87%) treated with chemoradiotherapy (87%). Primary reasons for gastrostomy use were poor appetite/dysgeusia (week 2-3) and odynophagia/mucositis (week 4-7). Early tube feeding adherence was 51%. Clinical tube feeding adherence was significantly higher in the intervention group (58% vs 38%, p=0.037). Key barriers to both phases of tube feeding were; nausea, early satiety and treatment factors (related to hospital healthcare processes). CONCLUSIONS Early tube feeding can improve patient adherence to clinically indicated tube feeding during treatment. Low adherence overall is a likely explanation for clinically significant weight loss despite intensive nutrition interventions. Optimising symptom management and strategies to overcome other barriers are key to improving adherence. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial has been registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials registry as ACTRN12612000579897.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Brown
- Centre for Dietetics Research (C-DIET-R), School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia.
| | - Merrilyn Banks
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia.
| | - Brett G M Hughes
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia; School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia.
| | - Charles Lin
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia; School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia.
| | - Lizbeth Kenny
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia; School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia.
| | - Judith Bauer
- Centre for Dietetics Research (C-DIET-R), School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Randomised controlled trial of early prophylactic feeding vs standard care in patients with head and neck cancer. Br J Cancer 2017; 117:15-24. [PMID: 28535154 PMCID: PMC5520203 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2016] [Revised: 04/21/2017] [Accepted: 04/24/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Weight loss remains significant in patients with head and neck cancer, despite prophylactic gastrostomy and intensive dietary counseling. The aim of this study was to improve outcomes utilising an early nutrition intervention. Methods: Patients with head and neck cancer at a tertiary hospital in Australia referred for prophylactic gastrostomy prior to curative intent treatment were eligible for this single centre randomised controlled trial. Exclusions included severe malnutrition or dysphagia. Patients were assigned following computer-generated randomisation sequence with allocation concealment to either intervention or standard care. The intervention group commenced supplementary tube feeding immediately following tube placement. Primary outcome measure was percentage weight loss at three months post treatment. Results: Recruitment completed June 2015 with 70 patients randomised to standard care (66 complete cases) and 61 to intervention (56 complete cases). Following intention-to-treat analysis, linear regression found no effect of the intervention on weight loss (10.9±6.6% standard care vs 10.8±5.6% intervention, P=0.930) and this remained non-significant on multivariable analysis (P=0.624). No other differences were found for quality of life or clinical outcomes. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: The early intervention did not improve outcomes, but poor adherence to nutrition recommendations impacted on potential outcomes.
Collapse
|
17
|
Brown TE, Wittholz K, Way M, Banks MD, Hughes BGM, Lin CY, Kenny LM, Bauer JD. Investigation of p16 status, chemotherapy regimen, and other nutrition markers for predicting gastrostomy in patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2017; 39:868-875. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.24630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2016] [Revised: 08/05/2016] [Accepted: 10/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa E. Brown
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics; Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital; Queensland Australia
- Centre for Dietetic Research (C-DIET-R), School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences; University of Queensland; Brisbane Australia
| | - Kym Wittholz
- Centre for Dietetic Research (C-DIET-R), School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences; University of Queensland; Brisbane Australia
| | - Mandy Way
- QIMR; Berghofer Medical Research Institute; Herston Queensland Australia
| | - Merrilyn D. Banks
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics; Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital; Queensland Australia
| | - Brett G. M. Hughes
- Cancer Care Services; Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital; Brisbane Queensland Australia
- School of Medicine; University of Queensland; Queensland Australia
| | - Charles Y. Lin
- Cancer Care Services; Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital; Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Lizbeth M. Kenny
- Cancer Care Services; Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital; Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Judith D. Bauer
- Centre for Dietetic Research (C-DIET-R), School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences; University of Queensland; Brisbane Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Brown TE, Banks MD, Hughes BGM, Lin CY, Kenny LM, Bauer JD. Comparison of Nutritional and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy Utilizing Prophylactic versus Reactive Nutrition Support Approaches. J Acad Nutr Diet 2016; 118:627-636. [PMID: 27986517 DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2016] [Accepted: 10/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal method of tube feeding for patients with head and neck cancer remains unclear. A validated protocol is available that identifies high-nutritional-risk patients who would benefit from prophylactic gastrostomy tube placement. Adherence to this protocol is ultimately determined by clinical team discretion or patient decision. OBJECTIVE The study aim was to compare outcomes after adherence and nonadherence to this validated protocol, thus comparing a prophylactic and reactive approach to nutrition support in this patient population. DESIGN We conducted a prospective comparative cohort study. Patients were observed during routine clinical practice over 2 years. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING Patients with head and neck cancer having curative-intent treatment between August 2012 and July 2014 at a tertiary hospital in Queensland, Australia, were included if assessed as high nutrition risk according to the validated protocol (n=130). Patients were grouped according to protocol adherence as to whether they received prophylactic gastrostomy (PEG) per protocol recommendation (prophylactic PEG group, n=69) or not (no PEG group, n=61). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome was percentage weight change during treatment. Secondary outcomes were feeding tube use and hospital admissions. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PERFORMED Fisher's exact, χ2, and two sample t tests were performed to determine differences between the groups. Linear and logistic regression were used to examine weight loss and unplanned admissions, respectively. RESULTS Patients were 88% male, median age was 59 years, with predominantly stage IV oropharyngeal cancer receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy. Statistically significantly less weight loss in the prophylactic PEG group (7.0% vs 9.0%; P=0.048) and more unplanned admissions in the no PEG group (82% vs 75%; P=0.029). In the no PEG group, 26 patients (43%) required a feeding tube or had ≥10% weight loss. CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic gastrostomy improved nutrition outcomes and reduced unplanned hospital admissions. Additional investigation of characteristics of patients with minimal weight loss or feeding tube use could help refine and improve the protocol.
Collapse
|