1
|
Sarig K, Oxley S, Kalra A, Sobocan M, Fierheller CT, Sideris M, Gootzen T, Ferris M, Eeles RA, Evans DG, Quaife SL, Manchanda R. BRCA awareness and testing experience in the UK Jewish population: a qualitative study. J Med Genet 2024; 61:716-725. [PMID: 38575303 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2023-109576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 1 in 40 UK Jewish individuals carry a pathogenic variant in BRCA1/BRCA2. Traditional testing criteria miss half of carriers, and so population genetic testing is being piloted for Jewish people in England. There has been no qualitative research into the factors influencing BRCA awareness and testing experience in this group. This study aimed to explore these and inform improvements for the implementation of population genetic testing. METHODS Qualitative study of UK Jewish adults who have undergone BRCA testing. We conducted one-to-one semistructured interviews via telephone or video call using a predefined topic guide, until sufficient information power was reached. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and interpreted using applied thematic analysis. RESULTS 32 individuals were interviewed (28 carriers, 4 non-carriers). We interpreted five themes intersecting across six time points of the testing pathway: (1) individual differences regarding personal/family history of cancer, demographics and personal attitudes/approach; (2) healthcare professionals' support; (3) pathway access and integration; (4) nature of family/partner relationships; and (5) Jewish community factors. Testing was largely triggered by connecting information to a personal/family history of cancer. No participants reported decision regret, although there was huge variation in satisfaction. Suggestions were given around increasing UK Jewish community awareness, making information and support services personally relevant and proactive case management of carriers. CONCLUSIONS There is a need to improve UK Jewish community BRCA awareness and to highlight personal relevance of testing for individuals without a personal/family history of cancer. Traditional testing criteria caused multiple issues regarding test access and experience. Carriers want information and support services tailored to their individual circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Samuel Oxley
- Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Ashwin Kalra
- Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Monika Sobocan
- Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | | | - Michail Sideris
- Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Rosalind A Eeles
- Oncogenetics, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wafik M, Kilby MD, Kulkarni A. Prenatal and pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders for germline cancer susceptibility gene variants: UK joint consensus guidance. BJOG 2023; 130:1563-1567. [PMID: 37334763 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Wafik
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, UK
| | - Mark David Kilby
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Women's and Children's Foundation Healthcare Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Anjana Kulkarni
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Calosci D, Passaglia L, Gabbiato I, Cartisano F, Affuso R, Sorrentino U, Zuccarello D. Public Awareness and Acceptability of PGT-M in Cancer Predisposition Syndromes. Genes (Basel) 2023; 14:2069. [PMID: 38003012 PMCID: PMC10671058 DOI: 10.3390/genes14112069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer Predisposition Syndromes (CPSs), also known as Hereditary Cancer Syndromes (HCSs), represent a group of genetic disorders associated with an increased lifetime risk of developing cancer. In this article, we provide an overview of the reproductive options for patients diagnosed with CPS, focusing on the emerging role of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic disorders (PGT-M). Specifically, we conducted a literature review about the awareness and acceptability of its application to CPSs. Based on the available data, the awareness of the applicability of PGT-M for CPSs appears to be limited among both patients and physicians, and a heterogeneous set of factors seems to influence the acceptability of the procedure. Our findings highlight the need for increasing education about the use of PGT-M for CPSs. In this context, guidelines developed by professional or institutional bodies would represent a useful reference tool to assist healthcare professionals in providing proper preconception counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Calosci
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padova, Italy; (L.P.); (I.G.); (F.C.); (R.A.); (U.S.)
| | - Lisa Passaglia
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padova, Italy; (L.P.); (I.G.); (F.C.); (R.A.); (U.S.)
| | - Ilaria Gabbiato
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padova, Italy; (L.P.); (I.G.); (F.C.); (R.A.); (U.S.)
| | - Francesca Cartisano
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padova, Italy; (L.P.); (I.G.); (F.C.); (R.A.); (U.S.)
| | - Rebecca Affuso
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padova, Italy; (L.P.); (I.G.); (F.C.); (R.A.); (U.S.)
| | - Ugo Sorrentino
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padova, Italy; (L.P.); (I.G.); (F.C.); (R.A.); (U.S.)
| | - Daniela Zuccarello
- Department of Lab Medicine Unit of Clinical Genetics and Epidemiology, University Hospital of Padova, Via Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padova, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dason ES, Drost L, Greenblatt EM, Scheer AS, Han J, Sobel M, Allen L, Jacobson M, Doshi T, Wolff E, McMahon E, Jones CA. Providers' perspectives on the reproductive decision-making of BRCA-positive women. BMC Womens Health 2022; 22:506. [PMID: 36482357 PMCID: PMC9730610 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-02093-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reproductive decision-making is difficult for BRCA-positive women. Our objective was to assess the complexities of decision-making and identify decisional supports for patients and providers when discussing reproductive options prior to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). METHODS This study was of qualitive design, using data collection via semi-structured interviews conducted from November 2018 to October 2020. Individuals were included if they were identified to provide care to BRCA-positive women. In total, 19 providers were approached and 15 consented to participate. Providers were recruited from three clinics in Toronto, Ontario located at academic centers: [1] A familial ovarian cancer clinic, [2] A familial breast cancer clinic and [3] A fertility clinic, all of which treat carriers of the BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic mutation. The interview guide was developed according to the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and included questions regarding reproductive options available to patients, factors that impact the decision-making process and the role of decisional support. Interviews were transcribed and transcripts were analyzed thematically using NVIVO 12. RESULTS Providers identified three major decisions that reproductive-aged women face when a BRCA mutation is discovered: [1] "Do I want children?"; [2] "Do I want to take the chance of passing on this the mutation?"; and [3] "Do I want to carry a child?" Inherent decision challenges that are faced by both providers and patients included difficult decision type, competing options, scientifically uncertain outcomes, and challenging decision timing. Modifiable decisional needs included: inadequate knowledge, unrealistic expectations, unclear values and inadequate support or resources. Identified clinical gaps included counselling time constraints, lack of reliable sources of background information for patients or providers and need for time-sensitive, geographically accessible, and centralized care. CONCLUSION Our study identified a need for a patient information resource that can be immediately provided to patients who carry a BRCA genetic mutation. Other suggestions for clinical practice include more time during consultation appointments, adequate follow-up, value-centric counseling, access to psychosocial support, and a specialized decisional coach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. S. Dason
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1E2 Canada ,Mount Sinai Fertility, 7th Floor, 250 Dundas St. W, Toronto, ON M5T 2Z5 Canada
| | - L. Drost
- grid.492573.e0000 0004 6477 6457Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5 Canada
| | - E. M. Greenblatt
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1E2 Canada ,grid.492573.e0000 0004 6477 6457Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5 Canada
| | - A. S. Scheer
- grid.415502.7Department of General Surgery, St. Michaels Hospital, Unity Health Network, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8 Canada
| | - J. Han
- grid.492573.e0000 0004 6477 6457Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5 Canada
| | - M. Sobel
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1E2 Canada ,grid.492573.e0000 0004 6477 6457Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5 Canada ,grid.417199.30000 0004 0474 0188Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2 Canada
| | - L. Allen
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1E2 Canada ,grid.492573.e0000 0004 6477 6457Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5 Canada ,grid.417199.30000 0004 0474 0188Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2 Canada
| | - M. Jacobson
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1E2 Canada ,grid.492573.e0000 0004 6477 6457Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5 Canada ,grid.417199.30000 0004 0474 0188Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2 Canada
| | - T. Doshi
- grid.492573.e0000 0004 6477 6457Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5 Canada
| | - E. Wolff
- grid.492573.e0000 0004 6477 6457Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5 Canada
| | - E. McMahon
- grid.492573.e0000 0004 6477 6457Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5 Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P8 Canada
| | - C. A. Jones
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1E2 Canada ,grid.492573.e0000 0004 6477 6457Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shah IH, Salo-Mullen EE, Amoroso KA, Kelsen D, Stadler ZK, Hamilton JG. Attitudes toward preimplantation genetic testing and quality of life among individuals with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2022; 20:31. [PMID: 36056367 PMCID: PMC9440538 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-022-00239-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (HDGC) syndrome is an autosomal dominant hereditary cancer predisposition associated with germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in the CDH1 gene. Identifying early stage HDGC is difficult, and prophylactic measures can be effective in preventing incidence. Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) can provide information about CDH1 variant status, HDGC risk, and limit familial transmission of CDH1 variants. To date, however, little is known about the attitudes of individuals with CDH1 variants towards PGT. METHODS Given that little is known about the reproductive attitudes of individuals with HDGC, we recruited participants with CDH1 variants from a familial gastric cancer registry and administered a cross-sectional survey with open- and closed-ended response items. We assessed attitudes regarding PGT and the effect of HDGC on quality of life. RESULTS Participants (n = 21) were predominantly partnered (61.9%), had a personal cancer history (71.4%), and had biological children (71.4%). Interest in learning about PGT was high; 66.7% of participants were interested in PGT and 90.5% approved of healthcare providers discussing PGT with individuals with CDH1 variants. Attitudes regarding personal use were varied. Among all participants, 35% would not, 25% were uncertain, and 40% would use PGT. Personal philosophy and preferences for family and reproduction were key factors related to PGT attitudes. HDGC had moderate effects on participants' quality of life, including social relationships, health behaviors, and emotional experiences including worry about cancer risk and guilt regarding familial implications. CONCLUSION PGT was identified by participants as acceptable for use in a variety of contexts and benefits of reproductive counseling involving PGT may extend beyond CDH1 carriers to family members' reproductive behaviors. Dispositions towards PGT are governed by personal philosophy or belief systems. These findings can help guide providers counseling individuals with CDH1 variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim H Shah
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erin E Salo-Mullen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kimberly A Amoroso
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Kelsen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zsofia K Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jada G Hamilton
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tutty E, Forbes Shepherd R, Hoskins C, Purvis R, Shanahan M, Boussioutas A, Forrest LE. Becoming and being a parent with an inherited predisposition to diffuse gastric cancer: A qualitative study of young adults with a CDH1 pathogenic variant. J Psychosoc Oncol 2022; 41:286-302. [PMID: 35959852 DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2022.2104676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study explored the experiences of young people with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome, as they navigate becoming and being a parent. DESIGN We used interpretive description and conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 young Australians (18-39 years) with a CDH1 pathogenic variant (PV). Data were analyzed using team-based, reflexive thematic analysis. FINDINGS Participants' reproductive decisions centered on the perceived manageability of HDGC, namely via gastrectomy, and timing of their genetic testing. Participants yet to have children and those with challenging gastrectomy experiences favored using reproductive technologies to prevent passing on their PV. Parents who had children before genetic testing described complicated decisions about having more children. Gastrectomy was considered a parental responsibility but recovery diminished parenting abilities. CONCLUSION Young people with HDGC face unique challenges navigating reproductive decision-making and parenting with gastrectomy. Findings lend credence to calls for longitudinal, developmentally sensitive genetic counseling services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Tutty
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rowan Forbes Shepherd
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Cass Hoskins
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rebecca Purvis
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mary Shanahan
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alex Boussioutas
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Laura E Forrest
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lombardi L, Trumello C, Stuppia L, Antonucci I, Brandão T, Babore A. BRCA1/2 pathogenetic variant carriers and reproductive decisions: Gender differences and factors associated with the choice of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and prenatal diagnosis (PND). J Assist Reprod Genet 2022; 39:1433-1443. [PMID: 35661074 PMCID: PMC9365893 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02523-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the way carriers of a BRCA1/2 pathogenetic variant make their reproductive decisions and to examine the factors associated with the choice of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and prenatal diagnosis (PND). Methods We conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method. Results A total of 16 articles published from 2000 to 2021 were included in this review. Data were overall collected from 3564 participants (86% females). Three important themes were identified across studies: changes in family planning, factors associated with family plans, and with acceptance or regret of PGD and PND. Conclusion This review may contribute to the knowledge of the experience of those who have a BRCA1/2 mutation and want a child. These results may help genetic counselors and healthcare professionals that support people with a BRCA pathogenetic variant with reproductive issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Lombardi
- Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Via Dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
| | - Carmen Trumello
- Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Via Dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy
| | - Liborio Stuppia
- Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Via Dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy.,Center for Advanced Studies and Technology-CAST, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Ivana Antonucci
- Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Via Dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy.,Center for Advanced Studies and Technology-CAST, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Tânia Brandão
- CIP, Department of Psychology, Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa "Luís De Camões, Lisbon, Portugal.,CPUP, Center for Psychology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Alessandra Babore
- Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Via Dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Forbes Shepherd R, Werner-Lin A, Keogh LA, Delatycki MB, Forrest LE. Reproduction and Genetic Responsibility: An Interpretive Description of Reproductive Decision-Making for Young People With Li-Fraumeni Syndrome. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2022; 32:168-181. [PMID: 34781775 DOI: 10.1177/10497323211046240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The reproductive decision-making of young people (aged 15-39 years) with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), an early onset inherited cancer syndrome, has not been studied in depth. Using interpretive description methodology, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 young Australians (mean age 25.5 years) diagnosed with LFS or at 50% genetic risk. With reflexive thematic analysis, we show how young people's reproductive decision-making and ideals for family formation were shaped by a sense of genetic responsibility to ensure the health of future biological kin. Reproductive technology provided choices for family formation in the context of LFS and also complicated reproductive decisions, as these choices were difficult to understand, make, or carry out. We uphold that reproductive decision-making when living with LFS is a profoundly moral practice that may pose significant challenges for young people navigating their formative years. We offer genetic counseling practice recommendations to support individuals with LFS when making reproductive decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rowan Forbes Shepherd
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, 3085Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, 2281The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Bruce Lefroy Centre for Genetic Health Research, 34361Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Allison Werner-Lin
- School of Social Policy and Practice, 6572The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Louise A Keogh
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, 2281The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Martin B Delatycki
- Bruce Lefroy Centre for Genetic Health Research, 34361Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, 2281The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Service, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Laura E Forrest
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, 3085Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, 2281The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fine E, Knoll MA, Maslow BSL. Fertility Considerations for Reproductive-Aged Carriers of Deleterious BRCA Mutations: A Call for Early Intervention. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 18:165-168. [PMID: 34606330 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Eliana Fine
- Jewish Orthodox Women's Medical Association (JOWMA), New York, NY.,Department of OBGYN, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stonybrook University, Stonybrook, NY
| | - Miriam A Knoll
- Jewish Orthodox Women's Medical Association (JOWMA), New York, NY.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Nyack Hospital, Nyack, NY
| | - Bat-Sheva L Maslow
- Jewish Orthodox Women's Medical Association (JOWMA), New York, NY.,Extend Fertility Medical Practice, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Moragón S, Di Liello R, Bermejo B, Hernando C, Olcina E, Chirivella I, Lluch A, Cejalvo JM, Martínez MT. Fertility and breast cancer: A literature review of counseling, preservation options and outcomes. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 166:103461. [PMID: 34461268 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 07/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Fertility preservation is an important issue in breast cancer patients undergoing oncological treatment. Fertility counseling is a crucial need given the physical and psychological stress experienced by patients. Cryopreservation of mature oocytes is currently the standard fertility-preserving procedure. Other options such as ovarian tissue preservation or gonadal protection during chemotherapy are still experimental, but have proven effectiveness. Prompt referral to a fertility unit is highly recommended in order to ensure quality of care. In this article, we focus on the different strategies to preserve fertility in breast cancer patients, assessing also the safety of pregnancy and breastfeeding after cancer. A systemic literature review was performed for research articles published in English in PubMed, or as abstracts from the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meetings, using the search terms "breast cancer" and "fertility".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago Moragón
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Raimondo Di Liello
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania ''Luigi Vanvitelli'', Naples, Italy
| | - Begoña Bermejo
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Center for Biomedical Network Research on Cancer (CIBERONC), Spain
| | - Cristina Hernando
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ernesto Olcina
- Hematology and Oncology Department, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Isabel Chirivella
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ana Lluch
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Center for Biomedical Network Research on Cancer (CIBERONC), Spain
| | - Juan Miguel Cejalvo
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Center for Biomedical Network Research on Cancer (CIBERONC), Spain.
| | - María Teresa Martínez
- Medical Oncology Department. INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang J, Pastore LM, Sarwana M, Klein S, Lobel M, Rubin LR. Ethical and moral perspectives of individuals who considered/used preimplantation (embryo) genetic testing. J Genet Couns 2021; 31:176-187. [PMID: 34279057 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
This study examined perspectives on the ethical implications of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) among individuals who actually (not hypothetically) used or considered using PGT. Most of the prior patient-centered research on PGT ethics used qualitative designs (9 out of the 11 articles) and focused only on single gene testing. This cross-sectional study used an anonymous online questionnaire; 15 items assessed potential ethical concerns involved in PGT decision-making, including clinical indications for PGT, the greater implications of PGT for society, and unused embryo disposition. N = 207 individuals (mean female/male age 35.7/38.9 years, 21% Hispanic or non-White) who had recently used or considered using PGT for single gene (60%) or for chromosomal testing (40%) completed the questionnaire. Most respondents supported PGT screening for disease conditions with childhood or adult onset that are untreatable (64%-85% across items); most opposed PGT for trait selection (76%-81%). Most respondents agreed that PGT aids in parental decision-making (66%-67%), although some expressed concern over potential unforeseen consequences (25%-30%). Regarding disposition of embryos without known genetic abnormalities, most respondents favored freezing indefinitely (86%) or donating to another family (69%), while for embryos with genetic abnormalities, most respondents favored donating to research (78%) or destroying them (62%). Stratification by religious affiliation revealed several differences, such as less acceptance of PGT for diseases that occur in adulthood and have no treatment options among Protestants (p = .015) and greater willingness to donate surplus embryos to research among participants without a religious affiliation (p < .001). These results are limited by the relatively homogeneous sample of participants (mostly White, married, and predominantly college-educated). In summary, participants who considered/used PGT found PGT acceptable overall for screening for disease conditions; most opposed using PGT for trait selection. Our novel questionnaire provides a structured tool for assessing the ethical perspectives surrounding the use of PGT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiahui Zhang
- Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony, Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Lisa M Pastore
- Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Miriam Sarwana
- Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Samantha Klein
- Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marci Lobel
- Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Lisa R Rubin
- Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lipton JH, Zargar M, Warner E, Greenblatt EE, Lee E, Chan KKW, Wong WWL. Cost effectiveness of in vitro fertilisation and preimplantation genetic testing to prevent transmission of BRCA1/2 mutations. Hum Reprod 2021; 35:434-445. [PMID: 32099994 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Revised: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Is it cost-effective to use in vitro fertilisation and preimplantation genetic testing of monogenic defects (IVT/PGT-M) to prevent transmission of BRCA1/2 mutations to second-generation new births in comparison with naturally conceived births? SUMMARY ANSWER In this cost-effectiveness analysis, we found that IVF/PGT-M is cost-effective for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers if using a willingness to pay of $50 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Carriers of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation have a significantly increased risk of several types of cancer throughout their lifetime. The cost of risk reduction, screening and treatment of cancer in this population is high. In addition, there is a 50% chance of passing on this genetic mutation to each child. One option to avoid transmission of an inherited deleterious gene to one's offspring involves in vitro fertilisation with preimplantation genetic testing. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We implemented a state transition model comparing the healthcare impact of a cohort of healthy children born after IVF/PGT-M, who have a population risk of developing cancer, to a cohort of naturally conceived live-births, half of whom are carriers of the BRCA mutation. Transition probabilities are based on published sources, a lifetime horizon and a perspective of a provincial Ministry of Health in Canada. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The target population is the second-generation new births who have at least one parent with a known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000 per QALY, IVF/PGT-M is a cost-effective intervention for carriers of either BRCA mutation. For BRCA1, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for IVF/PGT-M is $14 242/QALY. For BRCA2, the ICER of intervention is $12 893/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results show that IVF/PGT-M has a 98.4 and 97.3% chance of being cost-effective for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively, at the $50 000/QALY threshold. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Our model did not include the short-term negative effect of IVF/PGT-M on the woman's quality of life; in addition, our model did not consider any ethical issues related to post-implantation genetic testing. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS In countries in which the healthcare of a large segment of the population is covered by a single payer system such as the government, it would be cost-effective for that payer to cover the cost of IVF/PGT-M for couples in which one member has a BRCA mutation, in order to avoid the future costs and disutility of managing offspring with an inherited BRCA mutation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Dr Wong's research program was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), the Canadian Liver Foundation and an Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science Early Researcher Award. All authors declared no conflict of interests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph H Lipton
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Mahdi Zargar
- School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Ellen Warner
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Esther Lee
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kelvin K W Chan
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, Canada
| | - William W L Wong
- School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
La Marca A, Mastellari E. Fertility preservation for genetic diseases leading to premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:759-777. [PMID: 33495935 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02067-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The current review aims to summarize the data available concerning the applicability of fertility preservation techniques to genetic conditions at risk of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). METHODS A literature review through the PubMed Database was carried out. RESULTS About 10% of cases of POI is related to genetic diseases. The most frequent conditions associated with POI are Turner syndrome and fragile X pre-mutation; mutation of BRCA 1-2 genes and several other mutations and genetic syndromes have recently been highlighted, although they rarely occur. If a diagnosis is issued before POI onset, counseling on currently available fertility preservation techniques is advisable. In case of spontaneous menarche (this can occur variably depending on the mutation) established techniques like embryo or oocyte cryopreservation can be proposed, even if, in some cases, their effectiveness may be reduced by ovarian alterations connected to the mutation. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation has recently been defined as an established medical procedure for fertility preservation in young cancer patients and may be an option for prepubertal patients. However, it is still experimental in special populations with genetic diseases causing POI. New innovative experimental techniques, like in vitro maturation of immature oocytes (IVM) and vitro activation (IVA) of immature follicles on ovarian tissue, have shown limited but encouraging data and they will be probably available in the near future. For a correct risk-benefit evaluation, the following aspects should be considered: actual knowledge about the pathology-specific efficacy of the various techniques, the average age of onset of POI, the possible risks associated with the procedure in relation to the underlying pathology, the probability of spontaneous conception, as well as the health implications of a possible future pregnancy.. CONCLUSIONS Fertility preservation techniques represent a crucial opportunity for patients with genetic risk of POI. Early diagnosis increases the chances to apply these techniques. No specific recommendations concerning fertility preservation for each genetic pathology are available, and clinicians should first counsel the patient and her relatives about known risks and benefits of the available techniques, both those established and those considered as experimental.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio La Marca
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. .,Clinica Eugin Modena, Modena, Italy.
| | - Elisa Mastellari
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Skrovanek E, Dunbar-Jacob J, Dunwoody C, Wesmiller S. Integrative Review of Reproductive Decision Making of Women Who Are BRCA Positive. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2020; 49:525-536. [PMID: 32926832 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2020.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesize research findings about reproductive decision making among women who are BRCA positive. DATA SOURCES PubMed and CINAHL. STUDY SELECTION Articles published in English between 2000 and June 28, 2020, about the reproductive decision making of women with a confirmed BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. DATA EXTRACTION We extracted data about participants, study design, analysis, follow-up, and results. We used the modified Downs and Black checklist and Kennelly's qualitative data analysis to rate studies for quality and applicability by using. DATA SYNTHESIS We included five of 257 screened articles in our synthesis. The total sample size of the five studies was 1,468 women. The most prevalent factors related to reproductive decision making were the impending decisions regarding childbearing and family choices, including decisions about biological children, preventive surgery, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, and prenatal diagnosis to prevent further transmission of a BRCA mutation, and family planning. CONCLUSION A lack of knowledge exists about the reproductive decision-making processes of women who are BRCA positive. A better understanding of this process would provide nurses and other clinicians with the knowledge needed to support these women through their reproductive life choices.
Collapse
|
15
|
Reumkens K, Tummers MHE, Severijns Y, Gietel-Habets JJG, van Kuijk SMJ, Aalfs CM, van Asperen CJ, Ausems MGEM, Collée M, Dommering CJ, Kets M, van der Kolk LE, Oosterwijk JC, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, van der Weijden T, de Die-Smulders CEM, van Osch LADM. Reproductive decision-making in the context of hereditary cancer: the effects of an online decision aid on informed decision-making. J Community Genet 2020; 12:101-110. [PMID: 32880035 PMCID: PMC7846643 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-020-00484-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Individuals having a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners face challenging decisions regarding their wish to have children. This study aimed to determine the effects of an online decision aid to support couples in making an informed decision regarding their reproductive options. A nationwide pretest-posttest study was conducted in the Netherlands among 131 participants between November 2016 and May 2018. Couples were eligible for participation if one partner had a pathogenic variant predisposing for an autosomal dominant hereditary cancer syndrome. Participants completed a questionnaire before use (T0), and at 3 months (T3) after use of the decision aid to assess the primary outcome measure informed decision-making, and the secondary outcome measures decisional conflict, knowledge, realistic expectations, level of deliberation, and decision self-efficacy. T0-T3 comparisons show an overall positive effect for all outcome measures (all ps < 0.05; knowledge (ES = - 1.05), decisional conflict (ES = 0.99), participants' decision self-efficacy (ES = -0.55), level of deliberation (ES = - 0.50), and realistic expectations (ES = - 0.44). Informed decision-making increased over time and 58.0% of the participants made an informed reproductive decision at T3. The online decision aid seems to be an appropriate tool to complement standard reproductive counseling to support our target group in making an informed reproductive decision. Use of the decision aid may lessen the negative psychological impact of decision-making on couples' daily life and wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Reumkens
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marly H E Tummers
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Yil Severijns
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands. .,Department of Health Promotion, School CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Postbox 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Joyce J G Gietel-Habets
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Sander M J van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Cora M Aalfs
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christi J van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Department of Genetics, Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Margriet Collée
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte J Dommering
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marleen Kets
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jan C Oosterwijk
- Department of Genetics, Groningen University Medical Center, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Trudy van der Weijden
- Department of Family Medicine, School CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Christine E M de Die-Smulders
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth A D M van Osch
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Health Promotion, School CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Postbox 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fertility preservation and preimplantation genetic assessment for women with breast cancer. Cryobiology 2020; 92:1-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2019.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
17
|
Reumkens K, de Die-Smulders CEM, van Osch LADM. Exploring the preferences of involved health professionals regarding the implementation of an online decision aid to support couples during reproductive decision-making in hereditary cancer: a mixed methods approach. Fam Cancer 2019; 18:285-291. [PMID: 30656480 PMCID: PMC6449279 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-019-00119-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
To support persons having a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners during reproductive decision-making, an online decision aid was developed and evaluated. To maximize the impact of the support tool, this mixed methods study aims at developing the optimal implementation strategy for the decision aid. A questionnaire to assess the critical determinants that may affect this implementation was completed by health professionals involved in oncogenetic counselling (N = 46). Subsequently, semi-structured focus groups (N = 19) and individual telephonic interviews (N = 15) were performed with a subset of health professionals. All health professionals indicated to be willing to refer couples to the decision aid, preferably at the moment of receiving the genetic test result. They agreed that the primary requirement for implementation in daily practice was ease of referring couples and preferably free online accessibility. Referral to the tool was able to be included in the standard report couples receive after consultation, thereby making the use of additional paper-based materials redundant (e.g. flyers). Furthermore, incorporating the link to the decision aid on patient organization websites was suggested. Health professionals agreed that implementation would benefit more from promoting awareness regarding the decision aid rather than the inclusion of the tool in official clinical guidelines. To foster implementation of the decision aid, the distribution of online newsletters and the designation of a contact person charged with continued implementation in each Clinical Genetic Center were suggested. Based on these preferences and recommendations, the implementation of the online decision aid will be nationally executed to optimize impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Reumkens
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Christine E M de Die-Smulders
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth A D M van Osch
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Promotion, School CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Migliorini L, Cardinali P, Rania N. How Could Self-Determination Theory Be Useful for Facing Health Innovation Challenges? Front Psychol 2019; 10:1870. [PMID: 31474910 PMCID: PMC6702320 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper offers a presentation of the characteristics of self-determination theory (SDT) in the health context as well as attempts to identify how this theory could be useful for facing health innovation challenges. Health innovation is based on scientific advances that have more complex relationships with health. This paper encourages the use of the SDT approach to face health innovation, both for physiological and pathological processes. In particular, the focus is on the changes and lifestyle choices related to physiological pregnancy and birth and to oncological genetic tests in the Italian context. The health innovation paradigm focuses on patients taking responsibility for making important health-related choices, and we think that SDT can offer new stimuli in light of the changes implemented from innovations in the field of health. The aim is that this manuscript will stimulate researchers to test the potential of this theory in the field of changing health-related processes. Practitioners are called upon to revise their orientation toward patients and, according to SDT, they should support autonomy rather than control the promotion of health-related change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Migliorini
- Department of Education Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paola Cardinali
- Department of Education Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Nadia Rania
- Department of Education Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
The development of an online decision aid to support persons having a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners during reproductive decision-making: a usability and pilot study. Fam Cancer 2019; 18:137-146. [PMID: 29846879 PMCID: PMC6323089 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-018-0092-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
An online decision aid to support persons having a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners during reproductive decision-making was developed. A two-phase usability test was conducted among 12 couples (N = 22; 2 persons participated without their partner) at risk for hereditary cancer and 15 health care providers. Couples and health care providers expressed similar suggestions for improvements, and evaluated the modified decision aid as acceptable, easy to use, and comprehensible. The final decision aid was pilot tested (N = 16) with paired sample t tests comparing main outcomes (decisional conflict, knowledge, realistic expectations regarding the reproductive options and decision self-efficacy) before (T0), immediately (T1) and 2 weeks after (T2) use of the decision aid. Pilot testing indicated decreased decisional conflict scores, increased knowledge, and improved realistic expectations regarding the reproductive options, at T1 and T2. No effect was found for couples’ decision self-efficacy. The positive findings during usability testing were thus reflected in the pilot study. The decision aid will be further evaluated in a nationwide pretest–posttest study to facilitate implementation in the onco-genetic counselling setting. Ultimately, it is expected that the decision aid will enable end-users to make an informed decision.
Collapse
|
20
|
|
21
|
Young AL, Butow PN, Rhodes P, Tucker KM, Williams R, Healey E, Wakefield CE. Talking across generations: Family communication about BRCA1
and BRCA2
genetic cancer risk. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:516-532. [DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Revised: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Luk Young
- School of Psychology; The University of Sydney; Sydney NSW Australia
- Behavioral Sciences Unit Proudly Supported by the Kids with Cancer Foundation, Kids Cancer Centre; Sydney Children’s Hospital; Randwick Australia
| | - Phyllis N. Butow
- School of Psychology; The University of Sydney; Sydney NSW Australia
| | - Paul Rhodes
- School of Psychology; The University of Sydney; Sydney NSW Australia
| | - Katherine M. Tucker
- Prince of Wales Hereditary Cancer Centre; Prince of Wales Hospital; Randwick NSW Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine; University of New South Wales; Randwick NSW Australia
| | - Rachel Williams
- Prince of Wales Hereditary Cancer Centre; Prince of Wales Hospital; Randwick NSW Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine; University of New South Wales; Randwick NSW Australia
| | - Emma Healey
- Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong Hospital; Wollongong NSW Australia
| | - Claire E. Wakefield
- Behavioral Sciences Unit Proudly Supported by the Kids with Cancer Foundation, Kids Cancer Centre; Sydney Children’s Hospital; Randwick Australia
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health; University of New South Wales; Sydney NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Reumkens K, Tummers MHE, Gietel-Habets JJG, van Kuijk SMJ, Aalfs CM, van Asperen CJ, Ausems MGEM, Collée M, Dommering CJ, Kets CM, van der Kolk LE, Oosterwijk JC, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, van der Weijden T, de Die-Smulders CEM, van Osch LADM. Online decision support for persons having a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners during reproductive decision-making. J Genet Couns 2018; 28:533-542. [PMID: 30629779 PMCID: PMC7380023 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Revised: 09/01/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
A nationwide pretest–posttest study was conducted in all clinical genetic centres in the Netherlands, to evaluate the effects of an online decision aid to support persons who have a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners in making an informed decision regarding reproductive options. Main outcomes (decisional conflict, knowledge, realistic expectations, level of deliberation, and decision self‐efficacy) were measured before use (T0), immediately after use (T1), and at 2 weeks (T2) after use of the decision aid. Paired sample t tests were used to compute differences between the first and subsequent measurements. T0–T1 and T0–T2 comparisons indicate a significant reduction in mean decisional conflict scores with stronger effects for participants with high baseline decisional conflict. Furthermore, use of the decision aid resulted in increased knowledge levels and improved realistic expectations. Level of deliberation only increased for participants with lower baseline levels of deliberation. Decision self‐efficacy increased for those with low baseline scores, whereas those with high baseline scores showed a reduction at T2. It can be concluded that use of the decision aid resulted in several positive outcomes indicative of informed decision‐making. The decision aid is an appropriate and highly appreciated tool to be used in addition to reproductive counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Reumkens
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marly H E Tummers
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce J G Gietel-Habets
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sander M J van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Cora M Aalfs
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christi J van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Division of Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Margriet Collée
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - C Marleen Kets
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan C Oosterwijk
- Department of Genetics, Groningen University Medical Center, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Trudy van der Weijden
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Christine E M de Die-Smulders
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth A D M van Osch
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Promotion, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
A Systematic Review of How Young People Live with Inherited Disease: What Can We Learn for Li-Fraumeni Syndrome? J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2018; 7:525-545. [DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
|
24
|
Reumkens K, van Oudheusden AJG, Gietel-Habets JJG, Tummers MHE, de Die-Smulders CEM, van Osch LADM. Reproductive Decision Support: Preferences and Needs of Couples at Risk for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Geneticists. J Genet Couns 2018; 27:920-926. [PMID: 29372364 PMCID: PMC6061076 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0204-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
For couples at high risk of transmitting a cancer predisposition to offspring, reproductive decision-making can be challenging. As the choice between available reproductive options is preference-sensitive, the use of a decision aid can support these couples in their decisional process. The present study aims to investigate preferences and needs of involved stakeholders regarding the development and implementation of a patient decision aid. Semi-structured interviews assessing the needs and preferences regarding the content and functionalities of a decision support program were conducted among seven couples at risk for hereditary cancer and among eight clinical geneticists involved in oncogenetic counseling. Many similarities were found between the expressed preferences and needs of both stakeholder groups concerning the content, barriers and facilitating factors regarding the use of the decision aid, and its implementation. Emphasis was placed on the use of simple non-medical language, an extensive explanation of the procedures and techniques used in prenatal diagnosis (PND) and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), and the role of health care providers to refer couples to the decision aid. Both stakeholder groups were in favor of incorporating narrative stories in the decision aid. Integrating the present findings with knowledge on reproductive decisional motives and considerations is essential in guiding the development of a decision aid that corresponds to the preferences and needs of end-users. TRIAL REGISTRATION NTR5467.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Reumkens
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - A J G van Oudheusden
- Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J J G Gietel-Habets
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M H E Tummers
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - C E M de Die-Smulders
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - L A D M van Osch
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- School CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Schultz CL, Alderfer MA, Lindell RB, McClain Z, Zelley K, Nichols KE, Ford CA. The Influence of Adolescence on Parents' Perspectives of Testing and Discussing Inherited Cancer Predisposition. J Genet Couns 2018; 27:10.1007/s10897-018-0267-z. [PMID: 29909594 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0267-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2017] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a highly penetrant cancer predisposition syndrome that may present with a first cancer before or during adolescence/young adulthood. Families offered LFS genetic testing for their children can inform our understanding of how the unique developmental context of adolescence influences parental perspectives about genetic testing and discussions of cancer risk. In this study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 46 parents of children at risk for LFS to capture those perspectives. Analysis utilized summary descriptive statistics and inductive qualitative content coding. Most parents (33/46; 72%) expressed beliefs that adolescence influences the importance of LFS testing and/or discussions about genetic risk. Twenty-six parents related this influence to cognitive, physical, and social changes occurring during adolescence. Aspects of adolescence perceived as promoting LFS testing/discussion included developmental appropriateness, risks of cancer in adolescence, need for medical screening decisions, influence on behaviors, transition to adult health care, and reproductive risks. Aspects of adolescence perceived as complicating LFS testing/discussions included potential negative emotional impact, misunderstanding, added burden, and negative impact on self-image or future planning. Parents recognize the complex influence that adolescence has on LFS testing and conversations surrounding results. Further research is needed to understand the actual impact of genetic testing on young people, and how to best support parents and adolescents within the broader context of heritable diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corinna L Schultz
- Nemours Children's Health System/A.I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Melissa A Alderfer
- Division of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- The Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health System/A.I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Robert B Lindell
- Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Division of Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Zachary McClain
- Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Craig-Dalsimer Division of Adolescent Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kristin Zelley
- Division of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kim E Nichols
- Division of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Predisposition, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Carol A Ford
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Craig-Dalsimer Division of Adolescent Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mor P, Brennenstuhl S, Metcalfe KA. Uptake of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis in Female BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. J Genet Couns 2018; 27:1386-1394. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0264-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2017] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
27
|
Gietel-Habets JJG, de Die-Smulders CEM, Derks-Smeets IAP, Tibben A, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, van Golde R, Gomez-Garcia E, van Osch LADM. Support needs of couples with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer during reproductive decision making. Psychooncology 2018; 27:1795-1801. [PMID: 29644780 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Revised: 02/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Reproductive decision making for couples with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) is complex and can result in decisional conflict or regret. This study investigated couples' support needs and aimed to identify vulnerable couples. Ultimately, we should strive to develop a clear standard of care guideline regarding reproductive decision support. METHODS Mixed methods were used for data collection. A focus group study was conducted among 18 couples (N = 35) with HBOC who had made a reproductive decision after reproductive counselling. Subsequently, 129 similar couples (N = 258) were invited to complete a cross-sectional survey based on the focus group study. RESULTS Clinical and practical aspects of reproductive counselling were positively evaluated in the focus group study, although couples indicated a need for additional support with emotional and social concerns in which their relationship, social environment, and the way they picture their desired family were key elements. The survey was completed by 86 participants. Making a reproductive choice was experienced as (very) difficult by 43%, and 69% showed a need for additional support during decision making. Younger participants and those who opted for a natural pregnancy experienced more difficulty with reproductive decision making, and partners showed a higher need for psychological support than carriers. CONCLUSIONS Couples with HBOC who need to make a reproductive decision have specific needs for guidance and support, of which the desired content and methods can vary. It is therefore important to identify vulnerable couples and to attune counselling to couples' needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J J G Gietel-Habets
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - C E M de Die-Smulders
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - I A P Derks-Smeets
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A Tibben
- Centre for Human and Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - V C G Tjan-Heijnen
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R van Golde
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E Gomez-Garcia
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - L A D M van Osch
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Promotion/CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Genoff Garzon MC, Rubin LR, Lobel M, Stelling J, Pastore LM. Review of patient decision-making factors and attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Clin Genet 2018; 94:22-42. [PMID: 29120067 DOI: 10.1111/cge.13174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2017] [Revised: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 11/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The increasing technical complexity and evolving options for repro-genetic testing have direct implications for information processing and decision making, yet the research among patients considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is narrowly focused. This review synthesizes the literature regarding patient PGD decision-making factors, and illuminates gaps for future research and clinical translation. Twenty-five articles met the inclusion criteria for evaluating experiences and attitudes of patients directly involved in PGD as an intervention or considering using PGD. Thirteen reports were focused exclusively on a specific disease or condition. Five themes emerged: (1) patients motivated by prospects of a healthy, genetic-variant-free child, (2) PGD requires a commitment of time, money, energy and emotions, (3) patients concerned about logistics and ethics of discarding embryos, (4) some patients feel sense of responsibility to use available technologies, and (5) PGD decisions are complex for individuals and couples. Patient research on PGD decision-making processes has very infrequently used validated instruments, and the data collected through both quantitative and qualitative designs have been inconsistent. Future research for improving clinical counseling is needed to fill many gaps remaining in the literature regarding this decision-making process, and suggestions are offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M C Genoff Garzon
- Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY
| | - L R Rubin
- Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY
| | - M Lobel
- Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY
| | - J Stelling
- Reproductive Specialists of NY, Stony Brook, NY.,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY
| | - L M Pastore
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Grynberg M, Raad J, Comtet M, Vinolas C, Cédrin-Durnerin I, Sonigo C. Fertility preservation in BRCA-mutated women: when and how? Future Oncol 2018; 14:483-490. [PMID: 29327596 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BRCA 1 and 2 genes play a critical role in the safeguarding of DNA integrity. It is now well established that BRCA1 and BRCA2-mutated women are at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancers. However, several lines of evidence indicate that this genetic status may also be associated with ovarian dysfunction, in particular a reduced ovarian reserve. Considering the gonadal toxicity of cancer treatments and the recommendation of prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy around 40 years, young BRCA mutation carriers are confronted with difficult family planning decisions. Recent development in fertility preservation offers new possibilities for these women, not only before a potential cancer treatment, but also in healthy carriers. If the pregnancy seems to be safe in this population, oocyte vitrification following ovarian stimulation might help BRCA-mutated patients to conceive after cancer treatment or to undergo prenatal genetic diagnosis in order to avoid the risk of transmitting the genetic abnormality to their offspring. The present article aims to extensively discuss the fertility issues related to BRCA gene mutations and the questions raised by the possibility of fertility in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaël Grynberg
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France.,University Paris Sud XI, 94276, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.,Unité Inserm U1133, Université Paris-Diderot, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Jade Raad
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France
| | - Marjorie Comtet
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Avenue du 14 Juillet, 93140 Bondy, France.,University Paris XIII, 93017, Bobigny, France
| | - Claire Vinolas
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Avenue du 14 Juillet, 93140 Bondy, France
| | - Isabelle Cédrin-Durnerin
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Avenue du 14 Juillet, 93140 Bondy, France
| | - Charlotte Sonigo
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France.,Inserm U1185, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, 94276, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Klitzman R. Challenges, Dilemmas and Factors Involved in PGD Decision-Making: Providers’ and Patients’ Views, Experiences and Decisions. J Genet Couns 2017; 27:909-919. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0173-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
31
|
Hallowell N, Badger S, Richardson S, Caldas C, Hardwick RH, Fitzgerald RC, Lawton J. High-risk individuals' perceptions of reproductive genetic testing for CDH1 mutations. Fam Cancer 2017; 16:531-535. [PMID: 28204904 PMCID: PMC6061929 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-017-9976-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Reproductive genetic testing- PreNatal Diagnosis (PND) and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD)-for CDH1 mutations associated with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (HDGC)is available in the UK. This qualitative interview study examined high-risk individuals' (n = 35) views of CDH1 reproductive genetic testing. Interviewees generally regarded reproductive genetic testing as an acceptable form of HDGC risk management. However, some were concerned that their genetic risks required them to plan reproduction and anticipated difficulties communicating this to reproductive partners. Individuals had a preference for PGD over PND because it avoided the need for a termination of pregnancy. However, those who had not yet had children expressed concerns about having to undergo IVF procedures and worries about their effectiveness and the need for embryo selection in PGD. It is suggested that high-risk individuals are provided with access to reproductive genetic counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Hallowell
- Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Shirlene Badger
- PHG Foundation and Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sue Richardson
- Cambridge University Hospitals Trust, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Carlos Caldas
- Cambridge University Hospitals Trust, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Richard H Hardwick
- Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- PHG Foundation and Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals Trust, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rebecca C Fitzgerald
- Cambridge University Hospitals Trust, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Julia Lawton
- Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Fertility and pregnancy issues in BRCA -mutated breast cancer patients. Cancer Treat Rev 2017; 59:61-70. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2017] [Revised: 07/04/2017] [Accepted: 07/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
33
|
Acceptable applications of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) among Israeli PGD users. Eur J Hum Genet 2017; 25:1113-1117. [PMID: 28905883 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2016] [Revised: 06/08/2017] [Accepted: 06/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of PGD technology to select against genetic disorders and traits is increasing. Although PGD may eliminate some of the obstacles related to conservative options of prenatal diagnosis, it can raise personal, social and moral questions. Ethical issues concerning the justified uses of PGD are a subject of ongoing debate among medical and bioethical communities. Although attitudes toward the acceptable uses of PGD were evaluated among population groups worldwide, bioethics councils were criticized for ignoring public perspectives. In the last decade PGD has been widely used in Israel. The ethical guidelines were created solely by medical-bioethics experts and, some felt, totally isolated from public opinions. Semi-structured in-depth interviews of 37 users (carriers of autosomal recessive, dominant and X-linked disorders, and HLA-matching) were performed. The interviews explored attitudes toward ethical and sociological aspects of PGD. The overall results of this study show highly favorable attitudes of Israeli PGD users toward medical applications. Furthermore, our subjects demonstrate a more permissive stand toward the controversial application of social sex selection albeit with strong objection to esthetic means of selection. PGD users are coping with both genetic disease and load of the PGD procedure. Taking into consideration their opinion is important since it reflects the gains and burdens of these procedures alongside the demand for future optional services. Their attitudes should play an important role in the professional discussion concerning the justified uses of PGD and should significantly influence the design of policy making in this field.
Collapse
|
34
|
Dagan E, Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Friedman E, Feldman B. Performing and Declining PGD: Accounts of Jewish Israeli Women Who Carry a BRCA1/2 Mutation or Partners of Male Mutation Carriers. J Genet Couns 2017; 26:1070-1079. [PMID: 28265801 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0087-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2015] [Accepted: 02/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
To describe factors associated with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) decisions among Jewish Israeli BRCA1/2 carriers or spouses of a male carrier, we contacted all women who initiated PGD consultation for embryonic BRCA1/2 mutation detection at Sheba Medical Center, prior to March 2014. Applying a qualitative approach, we asked women to elaborate on the factors they considered in either opting for PGD or discontinuing the screening procedure. Participants were 18 Jewish Israeli women; 14 were carriers of one of the Ashkenazi founder mutations in BRCA1/2, and four were spouses of male mutation carriers, who underwent at least one cycle of PGD. Prior to seeking PGD, ten of the women had no children. At the time of the interview, all but three had at least one child. Three factors emerged as key motivators for PGD: having witnessed the disease in a close relative (n = 12); prior IVF treatment for infertility (n = 12); and having pre-existing frozen embryos (n = 6). Ten women withdrew from the PGD process due to clinical, logistical, and financial reasons. In conclusion, most women decided to withdraw from PGD instead of continuing until a successful conception was achieved. Those who opted for PGD attributed their discontinuation of further screening to the emotional burden that is greatly intensified by practical difficulties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efrat Dagan
- Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, PO Box 3498838, Haifa, Israel.
| | | | - Eitan Friedman
- The Susanne-Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Sheba Medical Center, PO Box 52621, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, PO Box 39040, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Baruch Feldman
- Sheba Medical Center, The Danek Gertner Institute of Human Genetics, PO Box 52621, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gietel-Habets JJG, de Die-Smulders CEM, Derks-Smeets IAP, Tibben A, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, van Golde R, Gomez-Garcia E, Kets CM, van Osch LADM. Awareness and attitude regarding reproductive options of persons carrying a BRCA mutation and their partners. Hum Reprod 2017; 32:588-597. [PMID: 28073972 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2016] [Accepted: 12/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION To what extent are BRCA mutation carriers and their partners in the Netherlands aware about preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and prenatal diagnosis (PND) as reproductive options and what is their attitude towards these options? SUMMARY ANSWER Awareness of PGD (66%) and PND (61%) among BRCA mutation carriers and their partners is relatively high and 80% and 26%, respectively, of BRCA carriers and their partners find offering PGD and PND for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) acceptable. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Internationally, awareness of PGD among persons with a genetic cancer predisposition appears to be relatively low (35%) and although acceptability is generally high (71%), only a small proportion of mutation carriers would consider using PGD (36%). However, for HBOC, there are no studies available that investigated the perspective of individuals with a confirmed BRCA1/2 mutation and their partners about PGD and PND including demographic and medical correlates of awareness and acceptability. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A cross-sectional survey was completed by 191 participants between July 2012 and June 2013. Participants were recruited through patient organizations (88%) and the databases of two Clinical Genetics departments in the Netherlands (12%). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Male and female BRCA carriers and their partners completed an online survey, which assessed demographic and medical characteristics, and awareness, knowledge, acceptability and consideration of PGD and PND as main outcomes. Correlations between demographic and medical characteristics and the main outcomes were investigated. MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE The majority of respondents were female (87%), of reproductive age (86%) and about half reported a desire for a child in the future. About two-thirds (66%) were aware of PGD and 61% of PND for HBOC. PGD knowledge was moderate (5.5 on a 9-point scale) and acceptability of PGD and PND for HBOC was 80% and 26%, respectively. A minority would personally consider using PGD (39%) or PND (20%). Individuals with a higher educational level were more likely to be aware of PGD (P < 0.001) and PND (P < 0.001) and persons with a more immediate child wish were more often aware of PGD (P = 0.044) and had more knowledge about PGD (P = 0.001). PGD acceptability was positively associated with knowledge about PGD (P = 0.047), and PND acceptability was higher among partners in comparison to carriers (P = 0.001). Participants with a history of cancer and with a higher perceived seriousness of breast and ovarian cancer were more likely to consider using PGD (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001 respectively) or PND (P = 0.021 and P = 0.017 respectively). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The response rate (23%) of participants invited by the clinical genetics departments was low, probably related to a simultaneous study that used a similar recruitment strategy within the same target group, which may have resulted in selection bias. Moreover, PGD knowledge was measured with an instrument that is not yet validated since to date such an instrument is not available in the literature. Finally, the cross-sectional design of this study limits us from drawing any causal conclusions. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Improvement of information provision remains needed, in order to timely inform all couples with HBOC about the available reproductive options and enable them to make a balanced reproductive decision. This may limit the risk of negative psychological impact due to decisional conflict and possible regret. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The Dutch breast cancer foundation Stichting Pink Ribbon (grant number 2010.PS11.C74). None of the authors have competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J J G Gietel-Habets
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - C E M de Die-Smulders
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - I A P Derks-Smeets
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A Tibben
- Centre for Human and Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - V C G Tjan-Heijnen
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, division of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R van Golde
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E Gomez-Garcia
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - C M Kets
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, code 848, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - L A D M van Osch
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Promotion/CAPHRI, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Dean M, Rauscher EA. “It was an Emotional Baby”: Previvors’ Family Planning Decision-Making Styles about Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk. J Genet Couns 2017; 26:1301-1313. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0069-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2016] [Accepted: 01/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
37
|
BRCA mutation genetic testing implications in the United States. Breast 2016; 31:224-232. [PMID: 27931006 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2016] [Revised: 11/22/2016] [Accepted: 11/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BRCA mutation carriers have a very high risk of breast and ovarian cancer by age 70, in the ranges 47%-66% and 40%-57%, respectively. Additionally, women with BRCA mutation-associated breast cancer also have an elevated risk of other or secondary malignancies. Fortunately, the breast and ovarian cancer outcome for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers is at least as good as for non-carriers with chemoprevention, prophylactic surgeries and appropriate use of therapies. Therefore, identification of those who might have a mutation is important so that genetic counseling, testing, screening and prevention strategies can be applied in a timely manner. This article reviews the impact of genetic testing in general, timing of genetic testing after diagnosis and prior knowledge of mutation status in BRCA carriers with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Additionally, risk-reducing surgeries including the prophylactic contralateral mastectomy, and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and the sensitivity of BRCA-defective breast cancer cell lines to differential chemotherapeutic agents will be discussed.
Collapse
|
38
|
Reproductive Decision-Making in Women with BRCA1/2 Mutations. J Genet Couns 2016; 26:594-603. [PMID: 27796678 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-0035-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2016] [Accepted: 10/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Expanded genetic testing of BRCA mutations has led to identification of more reproductive-aged women who test positive for the mutation which might impact attitudes and decisions about relationships, childbearing and the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and prenatal diagnosis (PND). A cross-sectional survey was administered to 1081 self-reported BRCA carriers to investigate how knowledge of BRCA status influences these issues. The mean age at BRCA test disclosure was 44 years and 36 % reported a personal history of cancer. Of 163 women who were unpartnered, 21.5 % felt more pressure to get married. Of 284 women whose families were not complete, 41 % reported that carrier status impacted their decision to have biological children. Women with a history of cancer were more likely to report that knowledge of BRCA+ status impacted their decision to have a child (OR 1.8, 95 % CI 1-3.2). Fifty-nine percent thought PGD should be offered to mutation carriers and 55.5 % thought PND should be offered. In conclusion, knowledge of BRCA status impacts attitudes regarding relationships and childbearing, and most carriers believe that PGD and PND should be offered to other carriers. This study suggests that BRCA carriers desire and would benefit from reproductive counseling after test disclosure.
Collapse
|
39
|
Mancini J, Mouret-Fourme E, Noguès C, Julian-Reynier C. Impact of BRCA1/2 mutation on young women's 5-year parenthood rates: a prospective comparative study (GENEPSO-PS cohort). Fam Cancer 2016; 14:273-9. [PMID: 25550141 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-014-9777-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Previous qualitative and intentions surveys have shown that the disclosure of a BRCA1/2 mutation might deter young women from becoming pregnant. However, to our knowledge, no comparative studies have ever documented the possibility that positive genetic test results might affect these women's future reproductive rates. Our aim was therefore to quantify the impact of BRCA1/2 mutation disclosure on long-term relationships between partners and childbearing rates. Participants were cancer-free women belonging to families in which a deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation had been identified, who had attended one of the 29 participating cancer genetic clinics for BRCA1/2 testing between 2000 and 2006. Logistic regression models were used to determine predictors of the 5-year self-reported parenthood rate. The sample consisted of 271 women aged 18-45 years (126 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and 145 non-carriers). Couples had separated more frequently among BRCA1/2 carriers than non-carriers (10 vs. 3%, p = .040), especially among nulliparous carriers (13%). Among the 104 women who were childless at disclosure, disclosure of a BRCA1/2 mutation was not significantly associated with childbearing during the 5-year follow-up period [adjusted odds ratio .64, 95% confidence interval (CI) (.26, 1.57), p = .334]. Among the 167 women with at least one child at disclosure of a BRCA1/2 mutation had no conspicuous effect on the childbearing trends [adjOR .88, 95% CI (.35, 2.21), p = .787]. The disclosure of a BRCA1/2 mutation might impact couples' relationships and future mothering rates, particularly among nulliparous women. Studies on larger populations are now required to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Mancini
- Aix Marseille Université, Inserm, IRD, UMR912 SESSTIM, 13385, Marseille, France,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Olesen AP, Nor SNM, Amin L. Attitudes Toward Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) for Genetic Disorders Among Potential Users in Malaysia. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 2016; 22:133-146. [PMID: 25724710 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-015-9639-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2014] [Accepted: 02/24/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
While pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is available and legal in Malaysia, there is an ongoing controversy debate about its use. There are few studies available on individuals' attitudes toward PGD, particularly among those who have a genetic disease, or whose children have a genetic disease. To the best of our knowledge, this is, in fact, the first study of its kind in Malaysia. We conducted in-depth interviews, using semi-structured questionnaires, with seven selected potential PGD users regarding their knowledge, attitudes and decisions relating to the use PGD. The criteria for selecting potential PGD users were that they or their children had a genetic disease, and they desired to have another child who would be free of genetic disease. All participants had heard of PGD and five of them were considering its use. The participants' attitudes toward PGD were based on several different considerations that were influenced by various factors. These included: the benefit-risk balance of PGD, personal experiences of having a genetic disease, religious beliefs, personal values and cost. The study's findings suggest that the selected Malaysian participants, as potential PGD users, were supportive but cautious regarding the use of PGD for medical purposes, particularly in relation to others whose experiences were similar. More broadly, the paper highlights the link between the participants' personal experiences and their beliefs regarding the appropriateness, for others, of individual decision-making on PGD, which has not been revealed by previous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Siti Nurani Mohd Nor
- Department of Science and Technology, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
- Section for Co-curricular Courses, External Faculty Electives * TITAS (SKET), University Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| | - Latifah Amin
- Pusat Citra UKM, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Quinn GP, Peshkin BN, Sehovic I, Bowman M, Tamargo C, Vadaparampil ST. Oncofertility in adolescent and young adult hereditary cancer: Considerations for genetics professionals. World J Med Genet 2015; 5:52-59. [DOI: 10.5496/wjmg.v5.i4.52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2015] [Revised: 08/07/2015] [Accepted: 09/28/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with a cancer diagnosis or those at risk for cancer due to hereditary cancer syndromes may benefit from genetic counseling and testing not only to manage personal risk but also to address reproductive concerns, especially fertility. The opportunity for genetic counselors to provide important risk information is relevant to both the newly diagnosed as well as to unaffected carriers and survivors. However, genetic counselors may need additional training in reproductive options related to AYA cancer to provide this valuable counsel. This commentary uses hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome as a model to highlight important considerations when discussing preimplanatation genetic diagnosis and prenatal diagnosis, particularly in the context of expanded testing for hereditary cancer risk including multigene panels or whole exome or whole genome sequencing. Other hereditary cancers are also addressed; however, less is known about the psychosocial and fertility concerns in these AYA populations. Additionally, we provide an overview of the concept of “oncofertility” - the linkage between cancer care and reproductive medicine that aims to expand the reproductive opportunities of cancer patients - and offer support for the expansion of guidelines to include genetic counselors in AYA cancer patients’ treatment planning related to reproductive health and fertility.
Collapse
|
42
|
BRCA mutation carriers show normal ovarian response in in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 2015; 104:1162-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2015] [Revised: 07/12/2015] [Accepted: 07/27/2015] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
43
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION OR BACKGROUND The UK is at the forefront of mitochondrial science and is currently the only country in the world to legalize germ-line technologies involving mitochondrial donation. However, concerns have been raised about genetic modification and the 'slippery slope' to designer babies. SOURCES OF DATA This review uses academic articles, newspaper reports and public documents. AREAS OF AGREEMENT Mitochondrial donation offers women with mitochondrial disease an opportunity to have healthy, genetically related children. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY Key areas of disagreement include safety, the creation of three-parent babies, impact on identity, implications for society, definitions of genetic modification and reproductive choice. GROWING POINTS The UK government legalized the techniques in March 2015. Scientific and medical communities across the world followed the developments with interest. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH It is expected that the first cohort of 'three parent' babies will be born in the UK in 2016. Their health and progress will be closely monitored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Dimond
- Cardiff School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mauer C, Spencer S, Dungan J, Hurley K. Exploration of Male Attitudes on Partnerships and Sexuality with Female BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers. J Genet Couns 2015; 25:290-7. [PMID: 26250348 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9870-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2015] [Accepted: 07/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Women with BRCA mutations are inundated with decisions about managing cancer risks and childbearing considerations. Decisions become more complicated when women face disclosing their mutation and risk-reduction options to a romantic partner. This study identifies the concerns and perspectives of male romantic partners regarding these unique decisions. Twenty-five male participants completed an online survey posted to cancer support group message boards. Participants reported relationship changes regarding intimacy levels (n = 9), attraction (n = 2), and communication (n = 22) after mutation disclosure. Participants whose partners had not undergone prophylactic mastectomy (n = 14) reported concerns regarding sexual relations (n = 5), post-surgical appearance (n = 2), post-surgical attraction (n = 5), and health/lifespan (n = 9). Participants did not express attitude changes toward childbearing. While mutation disclosure conversations and surgical options are concerns for many BRCA mutation carriers in relationships, male partners share these concerns. Aspects of the relationship may change, but male study participants continued to support their partners. This information can benefit female BRCA mutation carriers, their current or future partners, and genetic counselors working with this particular population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Mauer
- Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. .,UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-9323, USA.
| | - Sara Spencer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jeffery Dungan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Karen Hurley
- Clinical Genetics Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Non-invasive Prenatal Diagnosis for BRCA Mutations – a Qualitative Pilot Study of Health Professionals’ Views. J Genet Couns 2015; 25:198-207. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9858-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2015] [Accepted: 06/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
46
|
Rich TA, Liu M, Etzel CJ, Bannon SA, Mork ME, Ready K, Saraiya DS, Grubbs EG, Perrier ND, Lu KH, Arun BK, Woodard TL, Schover LR, Litton JK. Comparison of attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis among patients with hereditary cancer syndromes. Fam Cancer 2015; 13:291-9. [PMID: 24072553 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-013-9685-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) allows couples to avoid having a child with an inherited condition, potentially reducing cancer burden in families with a hereditary cancer predisposition. This study investigated and compared awareness and acceptance of PGD among patients with different hereditary cancer syndromes. Questionnaires were mailed to 984 adults with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Lynch syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis, or multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 or 2. Associations between clinical, demographic, and psychosocial factors and awareness and acceptance of PGD were examined. Of 370 respondents (38 % return rate), 28 % felt their syndrome impacted family planning, 24 % were aware of PGD, 72 % felt that PGD should be offered, 43 % would consider using PGD, and 29 % were uncertain. Family experience and syndrome-specific characteristics, such as disease severity, quality of life and availability of medical interventions as well as gender, family planning stage, and religiosity impact perceptions of the acceptability of PGD, though a high level of uncertainty exists. Hereditary cancer patients lack awareness of PGD despite feeling that PGD should be offered, highlighting the need for education on this topic. While we found attitudes about the acceptability of PGD to be generally similar to those reported in the literature and of genetics and ethics experts, we observed similarities and differences between syndromes that provide insight into why some hereditary cancer patients may find PGD more acceptable than others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thereasa A Rich
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
de Pedro M, Otero B, Martín B. Fertility preservation and breast cancer: a review. Ecancermedicalscience 2015; 9:503. [PMID: 25729416 PMCID: PMC4335963 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2015.503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2014] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women, and its incidence increases with age, with the majority of patients diagnosed after menopause. However, in 15–25% of cases, patients are premenopausal at the time of diagnosis, and about 7% of them are below the age of 40. Therefore, a considerable amount of young women are diagnosed with breast cancer during their reproductive life. Within this group, most cancer cases require cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy, which are responsible for a decrease in the patients’ reproductive function, along with their age. The efficacy of such treatments, among other factors, has led to a high five-year-survival rate, which results in an increasing number of young women who survive breast cancer before having fulfilled their reproductive wishes, especially considering the current trend to delay pregnancy until the late 30s or early 40s in developed countries. The combination of these factors justifies the importance of fertility preservation and reproductive counselling at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in young women. A wide range of fertility preservation techniques has been developed, such as ovarian suppression, oocyte and embryo cryopreservation, immature oocyte retrieval and in vitro maturation, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Early counselling and referral of these patients to fertility specialists are fundamental factors in order to maximise their chances of pregnancy. This review aims to update the knowledge about the influence of breast cancer in fertility, the influence of pregnancy and fertility preservation techniques in breast cancer patients and assessment of ovarian reserve for a better treatment choice. A special section dedicated to BRCA-mutation carriers has been included because of their specific features. A comprehensive literature search has been conducted, including publications from the last five years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María de Pedro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, HM Nuevo Belén University Hospital, HM Hospitales, José Silva 7, Madrid 28043, Spain
| | - Borja Otero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo 48903, Spain
| | - Belén Martín
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Getafe University Hospital, Getafe 28905, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Jégu M, Some Der A, Morcel K, Abadie C, Fritel X, Levêque J. [Breast and ovarian cancer due to BRCA1&2 hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome and reproduction: literature review]. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2015; 44:10-17. [PMID: 25455630 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2014.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2014] [Revised: 10/03/2014] [Accepted: 10/10/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Germline mutations BRCA1&2 are responsible in women for breast and ovarian cancers that commonly occur at a young age: as such, there are strong interactions between the oncological risks and the events of reproductive life, pregnancy, breastfeeding, and management of infertility. MATERIALS AND METHODS A review of the international literature from the PubMed database was conducted, and recommendations of French health agencies were exposed. Published studies are case-control and cohort studies in the majority, with a low level of evidence. RESULTS Pregnancy and lactation have no effect on breast and ovaries or even decreases the risk. The sex ratio among patients carrying the mutation is in favor of girls. It is not observed more infertility in patients carrying a mutation despite a strong suspicion of premature ovarian failure, and infertility treatments do not increase breast and ovarian risk. There are ethical debates concerning the place of pre-natal diagnosis: both experts and concerned patients recommend a case-by-case analysis of the requests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Jégu
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, CHU La Milétrie, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - A Some Der
- Service de gynécologie, CHU Anne-de-Bretagne, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, BP 90 347, 35203 Rennes cedex 2, France
| | - K Morcel
- Service de gynécologie, CHU Anne-de-Bretagne, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, BP 90 347, 35203 Rennes cedex 2, France
| | - C Abadie
- Service de génétique, CHU Anne-de-Bretagne, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, BP 90 347, 35203 Rennes cedex 2, France
| | - X Fritel
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, CHU La Milétrie, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - J Levêque
- Service de gynécologie, CHU Anne-de-Bretagne, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, BP 90 347, 35203 Rennes cedex 2, France.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Avoir un enfant et accéder au DPN/DPI pour des femmes porteuses d’une mutation BRCA ? Malades et indemnes appréhendent la question différemment. Bull Cancer 2014; 101:1001-8. [DOI: 10.1684/bdc.2014.2036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
50
|
Rubin LR, Werner-Lin A, Sagi M, Cholst I, Stern R, Lilienthal D, Hurley K. ‘TheBRCAClock is Ticking!’: Negotiating medical concerns and reproductive goals in preimplantation genetic diagnosis. HUM FERTIL 2014; 17:159-64. [DOI: 10.3109/14647273.2014.940003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|