Cicatricial changes in ocular pemphigus

The Role of Serology in the Diagnosis of Ocular Predominant Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid and the Search for an Ocular-Specific Autoantigen

Ocular predominant mucous membrane pemphigoid (oMMP) is a severe subtype of MMP that can lead to scarring and blindness. While conjunctival biopsy for direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is considered the gold standard for diagnosis, limited sensitivity results in a false-negative rate upwards of 40%. Likewise, it remains unclear to what extent a negative biopsy, whether false-negative or true-negative, results in a different prognosis, with patients previously termed "pseudopemphigoid" demonstrating comparable disease progression. Serologic testing allows for a less invasive means to demonstrate circulating autoantibodies against known autoantigens in pemphigoid diseases. Patients with MMP, particularly oMMP, however, typically demonstrate low titers of circulating autoantibodies, limiting the diagnostic utility of these tests. The autoantigen integrin β4 has been previously reported to be a specific marker of pure ocular MMP, while in the majority of patients with oMMP, the identified target antigens are BP180 (type XVII collagen) and laminin 332. Recent studies have, however, demonstrated inconsistent reactivity and specificity for integrin β4 as an ocular-specific marker in MMP. Herein, we review the role of serologic testing in the diagnosis and prognosis of oMMP, as well as the current understanding of autoantigens in oMMP.Abbreviations: BMZ - basement membrane zone, DIF - direct immunofluorescence, IIF - indirect immunofluorescence, MMP - mucous membrane pemphigoid, oMMP - ocular predominant mucous membrane pemphigoid.

Evaluation of Dry Eye Severity and Ocular Surface Inflammation in Patients with Pemphigus and Pemphigoid

PURPOSE

To evaluate ocular surface involvement, tear cytokine levels, and histopathological changes in pemphigus and pemphigoid patients.

METHODS

A total of 22 patients (15 pemphigus and 7 pemphigoids) and 21 non-diseased controls were enrolled in our study. All participants underwent ocular surface evaluation, which included ocular surface disease index test, slit lamp observation, dry eye-related examination, tear multicytokine analysis, and conjunctival impression cytology.

RESULTS

Pemphigus and pemphigoid patients presented much more severe conjunctivochalasis, corneal epithelial defects, corneal opacity, symblepharon   and dry eye. Severe ocular surface squamous metaplasia and a significant increase of tear macrophage inflammatory protein-1beta, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL -6, and IL-8 occurred in pemphigus and pemphigoid patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results revealed that ocular surface inflammation and dry eye persist in most pemphigus and pemphigoid patients, and do not occur in parallel with the systemic course. Regular ophthalmological examinations and local anti-inflammatory should be provided for pemphigus and pemphigoid patients.

Ocular involvement in autoimmune bullous diseases

Autoimmune bullous diseases represent a heterogenous group of disorders caused by autoantibodies against adhesion molecules; the location of the target protein determines the level of cleft formation. The spectrum of ocular lesions in autoimmune bullous diseases can range from mild symptoms to severe involvement with sight impairment and even, in some cases, blindness. In pemphigus vulgaris, the prevalence of ocular involvement has been reported to be between 7% and 26%. The most common clinical sign of ocular pemphigus vulgaris is bilateral conjunctivitis with hyperemia. Ocular involvement also occurs in 41% to 70% of patients with paraneoplastic pemphigus. The main ocular manifestations are bilateral cicatrizing conjunctivitis with symblepharon formation, and shortening of the fornices. In mucous membrane pemphigoid, ocular involvement is seen in 61% to 70% of patients; the most frequent ocular finding is cicatricial conjunctivitis. Patients with autoimmune bullous diseases having common ocular involvement should be assessed by an ophthalmologist to avoid serious complications. Diagnostic procedures and treatment require multidisciplinary care based on the close cooperation between dermatologists and ophthalmologists.

Vesiculobullous Lesions of the Oral Cavity

Several dermatological conditions may manifest in the oral cavity, particularly those that are immune-mediated, and they must be distinguished from the various other types of oral ulcerations. This chapter discusses the clinical features, pathogenesis, differential diagnosis, and diagnostic features, including histology and immunofluorescence findings, as well as management of vesiculobullous diseases. These diseases include pemphigus Vulgaris, benign mucous membrane pemphigoid, bullous pemphigoid, and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. These diseases have a significant impact on the quality of life, as they can lead to serious complications, depending on the extent of the disease. Therefore, early recognition is crucial, helping to reduce disease-related morbidity, mortality and prevent life-threatening complications.

Sacral Dimple, Conjunctiva, and Nipple as Less Obvious Pemphigus Vulgaris Locations around Natural Body Orifices: A Report of Three Cases

In this paper, we present our own clinical-laboratory experience concerning three less obvious presentations of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and discuss the pertinent literature. The involvement of the sacral dimple reported here for the first time, as well as the nipple and the eyes, could initially be misleading clinically. These less stereotypical localizations may occur due to the transition of different epithelia, each with varying levels of cadherin (desmoglein, desmocollin) and thus altered sensitivity to mechanical stress. The role of dermatologists who have experience in treating autoimmune blistering dermatoses is fundamental for identifying promptly the initial and exacerbating PV lesions in such unusual locations.

Ocular surface involvement in pemphigus vulgaris: An interdisciplinary review

PURPOSE

A review of the published literature on the history, pathogenesis, and treatment of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and its ocular involvement.

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), and google scholar for pemphigus vulgaris and ocular PV. Inclusion criteria were given to meta-analysis, case-controlled studies, and documented case reports. The data were examined and independently analyzed by more than two of the authors.

RESULTS

PV is a humoral autoimmune disease with a preponderance of IgG4 anti-desmoglein 3 antibodies. Upon antibody binding, there is an intracellular signaling mechanism that leads to blister formation. Ocular findings are seen in up to 16% of PV patients with conjunctivitis being the most common clinical presentation. New steroid-sparing agents have helped with the control of this deadly disease, and with better understanding of the pathogenesis of PV, other cytokine blockers currently available are promising steroid-sparing agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Ocular pemphigus can occasionally present prior to mucocutaneous findings. Recalcitrant conjunctivitis with conjunctival blisters should warrant a workup for systemic PV.

Ocular Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid: Current State of Pathophysiology, Diagnostics and Treatment

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a systemic cicatrizing autoimmune disease that primarily affects orificial mucous membranes, such as the conjunctiva, the nasal cavity, the oropharynx, and the genitalia. Ocular involvement occurs in about 70% of all MMP cases. Ocular MMP (OcMMP) also encompasses the conditions linear immunoglobulin A disease, mucosal dominated epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, and anti-laminin 332/anti-epiligrin/anti-laminin 5 pemphigoid. It is a complex clinical entity that may lead to ocular surface failure and result in inflammatory and infectious complications, as well as potentially devastating visual loss. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment are of paramount importance and require a high level of expertise as this condition can be extremely challenging to diagnose and treat even for experienced clinicians. In this review we provide an up-to-date insight on the pathophysiology of OcMMP, with an emphasis on the current state of its diagnostics and therapeutics. Our the aim is to increase our understanding of OcMMP and highlight modern diagnostic and therapeutic options.

[Influence of fibrosis mediators on the outcomes of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy]

INTRODUCTION

Fibrosis is the most important pathologic condition involved in undesirable outcomes of dacryocystorhinostomy. A number of biochemical factors are currently known to have an effect on wound healing by promoting excessive scarring. Isoforms of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β1) are considered the 'main' pro-fibrotic factor, but wound healing is also affected by other cytokines such as connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), which stimulates fibrosis, and fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2), which acts as antagonist to it.

PURPOSE

To investigate correlations between endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy outcomes and certain mediators of fibrosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 45 cases of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. The patients were grouped according to surgery outcome: patients with unsuccessful surgical treatment were assigned to group 1 (n=10); patients with successful surgical treatment - to group 2 (n=34). One patient was excluded from the study. Full-layer biopsy specimen were taken from patients' nasal mucosa before the surgery. TGF-β1, TGF-β2, TGF-β3, CTGF, FGF-2 concentrations were evaluated using ELISA and normalized by total protein concentration.

RESULTS

Surgical failure was observed in 10 cases (22.72%). CTGF concentration was significantly correlated with negative outcome (p<0.05) and was elevated in most specimen obtained from group 1. No significant correlation was noted between the concentrations of other evaluated cytokines in nasal mucosa specimens and the surgical outcome.

CONCLUSION

The study found a correlation between CTGF concentration in nasal mucosa and dacryocystorhinostomy outcome, which supports the hypothesis suggested by several authors linking dacryocystorhinostomy failure with chronic inflammation in nasal mucosa.

A review of scoring systems for ocular involvement in chronic cutaneous bullous diseases

BACKGROUND

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) and autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBD) describe a group of rare chronic dermatoses characterized by cutaneous fragility and blistering. Although uncommon, significant ocular surface disease (OSD) may occur in both and require ophthalmological assessment. Disease scoring systems have a critical role in providing objective and accurate assessment of disease severity. The objectives of this report were, firstly, to document the prevalence and severity of ocular involvement in EB/AIBD. Secondly, to review and evaluate existing ocular and systemic scoring systems for EB/AIBD. Finally, to identify areas where further development of ocular specific tools in EB/AIBD could be pursued.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in October 2017 utilising Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases. The results were restricted by date of publication, between 01.01.1950 and 31.10.2017. The reference lists of these articles were then reviewed for additional relevant publications. Articles of all languages were included if an English translation was available. Articles were excluded if they were duplicates, had no reference to ocular involvement in EB/AIBD or described ocular involvement in other diseases.

RESULTS

Descriptions of ocular involvement in EB/AIBD were identified in 88 peer-reviewed journal articles. Findings reported include but are not limited to: cicatrising conjunctivitis, meibomian gland dysfunction, dry eye disease, trichiasis, symblepharon, fornix fibrosis, keratopathy, ectropion/entropion, ankyloblepharon, corneal ulceration, visual impairment and blindness. Although scoring systems exist for assessment of OSD in mucous membrane pemphigoid, no such tools exist for the other AIBD subtypes or for EB. Several systemic scoring systems exist in the dermatological literature that are efficacious in grading overall EB/AIBD severity, but have limited inclusion of ocular features. To the best of our knowledge, there is no recognised or validated scoring systems which comprehensively stages or grades the spectrum of ocular manifestations in EB/AIBD.

CONCLUSIONS

There are a range of ocular complications documented in EB and AIBD. Development of a comprehensive ocular scoring system for EB/AIBD which incorporates the delineation between 'activity' and 'damage' would facilitate more objective patient assessment, improved longitudinal monitoring, comparison of intervention outcomes, and provide commonality for discussion of these patients due to the multidisciplinary nature of their care.

The 2016 Bowman Lecture Conjunctival curses: scarring conjunctivitis 30 years on

This review is in two sections. The first section summarises 35 conditions, both common and infrequent, causing cicatrising conjunctivitis. Guidelines for making a diagnosis are given together with the use of diagnostic tests, including direct and indirect immunofluorescence, and their interpretation. The second section evaluates our knowledge of ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid, which is the commonest cause of cicatrizing conjunctivitis in most developed countries. The clinical characteristics, demographics, and clinical signs of the disease are described. This is followed by a review and re-evaluation of the pathogenesis of conjunctival inflammation in mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP), resulting in a revised hypothesis of the autoimmune mechanisms causing inflammation in ocular MMP. The relationship between inflammation and scarring in MMP conjunctiva is described. Recent research, describing the role of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) and retinoic acid (RA) in both the initiation and perpetuation of profibrotic activity in MMP conjunctival fibroblasts is summarised and the potential for antifibrotic therapy, using ALDH inhibition, is discussed. The importance of the management of the ocular surface in MMP is briefly summarised. This is followed with the rationale for the use of systemic immunomodulatory therapy, currently the standard of care for patients with active ocular MMP. The evidence for the use of these drugs is summarised and guidelines given for their use. Finally, the areas for research and innovation in the next decade are reviewed including the need for better diagnostics, markers of disease activity, and the potential for biological and topical therapies for both inflammation and scarring.

Pseudopemphigoid as caused by topical drugs and pemphigus disease

Pseudopemphigoid can cause a chronic cicatricial conjunctivitis that is clinically identical to the manifestations seen in mucous membrane pemphigoid, a disorder with a common clinical phenotype and multiple autoimmune links. For the purpose of this review, we will describe pseudopemphigoid as caused by topical drugs, the most common etiology with ocular manifestations, and as caused by the pemphigus disease, a more rare etiology. Specifically, we will discuss the ophthalmological features of drug-induced cicatricial conjunctivitis, pemphigus vulgaris, and paraneoplastic pemphigus. Other etiologies of pseudopemphigoid exist that will not be described in this review including autoimmune or inflammatory conditions such as lichen planus, sarcoidosis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s granulomatosis), erythema multiforme (minor, major, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome), bullous pemphigoid, skin-dominated linear IgA bullous dermatosis, and skin-dominated epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. Prompt diagnosis of the underlying etiology in pseudopemphigoid is paramount to the patient’s outcome as certain diseases are associated with a more severe clinical course, increased ocular involvement, and differential response to treatment. A complete history and ocular examination may find early cicatricial changes in the conjunctiva that are important to note and evaluate to avoid progression to more severe disease manifestations. When such cicatricial changes are noted, proper diagnostic techniques are needed to help elucidate a diagnosis. Lastly, collaboration between ophthalmologists and subspecialists such as dermatologists, pathologists, immunologists, and others involved in the care of the patient is needed to ensure optimal management of disease.