Difluprednate versus prednisolone acetate for inflammation following cataract surgery in pediatric patients: a randomized safety and efficacy study

Use of corticosteroids in non-infectious uveitis - expert consensus in Taiwan

PURPOSE

To offer consensus on the utilization of corticosteroids (CS) for treating non-infectious uveitis in the context of clinical practice in Taiwan. This entails examining the different administration methods, their advantages and disadvantages, and considering alternative treatments according to the prevailing evidence and health policies.

METHODS

Ten ophthalmologists and one rheumatologist convened on December 11, 2022, to review and discuss literature on the topic. The databases explored were the Central Cochrane library, EMBASE, Medline, PUBMED, and Web of Science using relevant keywords. The search spanned from January 1996 to June 2023. After the initial results of the literature review were presented, open voting determined the final statements, with a statement being accepted if it secured more than 70% agreement. This consensus was then presented at significant meetings for further discussions before the final version was established.

RESULTS

A flow chart and nine statements emerged from the deliberations. They address the importance of CS in uveitis management, guidelines for using topical CS, indications for both periocular or intravitreal and systemic therapies, and tapering and discontinuation methods for both topical and systemic CS.

CONCLUSION

While CS are a cornerstone for non-infectious uveitis treatment, their administration requires careful consideration, depending on the clinical situation and the specific type of uveitis. The consensus generated from this article provides a guideline for practitioners in Taiwan, taking into account local health policies and the latest research on the subject. It emphasizes the significance of strategic tapering, the potential for alternative therapies, and the importance of patient-centric care.

Use of ultrasound biomicroscopy to predict the outcome of anterior segment reconstruction in congenital fibrovascular pupillary membrane with secondary glaucoma

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anterior segment reconstruction (ASR) in congenital fibrovascular pupillary membrane-induced secondary glaucoma (CFPMSG) basing ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) classification.

METHODS

This ambispective cohort study enrolled patients with CFPMSG who underwent ASR between January 2014 and September 2020. Comprehensive ophthalmic examinations and UBM were performed before surgery and postoperatively. The patients were classified into three types according to the UBM configurations. Anterior chamber recovery (ACR) was defined as deepening in anterior chamber (≥1.5 mm all through final follow-up (FFU), while success following ASR was defined as ACR and intraocular pressure (IOP)≤21 mm Hg.

RESULTS

25 eyes of 25 patients underwent ASR (average age at operation 5.8±5.0 months, 48% girls) with FFU 15.8±16.9 months. Enrolled subjects were classified into type Ⅰ (11 eyes), type Ⅱ (11 eyes) and type Ⅲ (3 eyes). After ASR, 23 eyes (92%) achieved ACR, and the mean ACD increased in all groups (p=0.006, <0.001 and 0.003, respectively). Eyes with types Ⅰ and Ⅱ demonstrated a reduction of IOP (p=0.009 and 0.002, respectively). ASR success rate was highest in type Ⅰ (72.9%) compared with types Ⅱ and Ⅲ (18.2% and 0%, respectively; p=0.011). ASR led to decreased number of antiglaucoma medications for type Ⅰ CFPMSG at FFU (p=0.016). No vision-threatening postoperative complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

ASR for CFPMSG results in increased ACD and improvement in IOP. Postoperative IOP control was best in type Ⅰ CFPMSG but not as effective in types Ⅱ and Ⅲ. UBM-based classification helps to predict the surgical outcome of ASR in CFPMSG.

HPLC-UV Method Development and Validation to Monitor Difluprednate Synthesis

During the synthesis of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) there is a need for the development and validation of a simple and rapid high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for the determination and quantification of the synthesized product and related by-products. An HPLC method gives a better understanding of how a synthesis is proceeding. A rapid and easy to use HPLC-UV (ultraviolet) method for the determination of difluprednate and monitoring of impurities generated during synthesis was developed and validated. A Shimadzu VP Series HPLC equipped with a LabSolutions software and UV detector set at 240 nm was used for analysis. The mobile phase consisted of phosphate buffer (pH 6) and acetonitrile 50:50 (v/v) and was eluted at a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. Separation took place on a reversed-phase Kinetex C18 column (150 × 4.60 mm; 5 μm i.d.). Column temperature was set at 40°C. The developed method was found to have good linearity and acceptable accuracy and precision. The developed method may be effectively applied to determine products and by-products formed during synthetic reactions of steroids and to calculate the yield of the products obtained during each step of the synthesis.

Risk of Elevated Intraocular Pressure With Difluprednate in Patients With Non-Infectious Uveitis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the risk factors associated with clinically important intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation with topical difluprednate treatment in patients with non-infectious uveitis.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Fifty-four eyes of 54 patients with non-infectious uveitis treated with topical difluprednate at the current institution were included. Demographics and clinical characteristics of uveitis patients were collected. The main outcome measure was development of clinically important IOP elevation defined as IOP ≥21 mmHg and an increase of ≥10 mmHg from baseline.

RESULTS

A clinically important IOP elevation was observed in 17 patients (31.5%). The mean time to clinically important IOP elevation was 7.4±4.8 weeks (range 3-19). Statistically significant risk factors for incident clinically important IOP elevation were being a child (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 7.85 [95% CI 1.48-41.56], P = .02) and concurrent use of systemic steroids (aHR 5.31 [95% CI 1.18-24.00], P = .03). Patients with concurrent systemic corticosteroids developed clinically important IOP elevation earlier than those without systemic corticosteroid (mean 5.7±3.4 [range 3-14] vs 10.4±5.7 [range 4-19] weeks, P = .05). Incident IOP ≥30 mmHg occurred in 7 patients (13.0%). All patients responded well to the cessation of difluprednate and/or use of topical antiglaucomatous agents and no eyes required glaucoma surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that clinically important IOP elevation is common in uveitis patients with topical difluprednate treatment. Children and patients with concurrent systemic corticosteroids are at substantial risk of developing clinically important IOP elevation.

Review of Corticosteroid Use in Pediatric Cataract Surgery

Introduction:

Following pediatric cataract surgery, an intense inflammatory response is related to various complications, including posterior capsule opacification (PCO), which is a visually threatening incidence that can lead to visual axis opacification (VAO). Although corticosteroids are essentially effective in reducing inflammation, potential ocular side effects are a remaining concern.

Objective:

This study aimed to review the efficacy and safety of corticosteroid drugs and their administration routes in pediatric patients who underwent cataract surgery

Methods:

A literature search was conducted from four electronic databases using keywords selected a priori. Identified articles were sorted according to the type of corticosteroid used, route of administration, and outcome measures, including inflammatory response and ocular side effects.

Results:

Five studies were included with one case series, one retrospective case-control, and three clinical trials. The total number of subjects was 311 patients, with an age range of six weeks to 15 years old. Four studies analyzed the use of triamcinolone acetonide intracamerally, which was superior to topical steroids. Most of the studies reported a decrease in inflammatory parameters. The outcome of PCO and VAO varied between studies. Nearly all the studies observed elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) as an ocular side effect.

Conclusion:

Various corticosteroids and different delivery routes can be used to ameliorate inflammation in pediatric cataract surgery. However, there is promising evidence suggesting intracameral steroids as substantially beneficial in reducing inflammatory parameters. Due to the limited number of studies reviewed, no firm conclusion regarding the superior steroid preparation or route of administration can be inferred. This review highlights the need for further studies.

Therapeutic Efficacy of Difluprednate 0.05% Versus Prednisolone Acetate 1% in Controlling Inflammation and Macular Oedema Following Phacoemulsification: An Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Topical corticosteroids have been the cornerstone in the management of postoperative inflammation following cataract surgery. Due to potential side effects of the older topical steroids like prednisolone acetate and dexamethasone or betamethasone, newer potent steroids preparation like difluprednate, loteprednol or fluorometholone are now being used at lesser dose and frequency to control inflammation. There is scanty literature on the efficacy of these drugs in preventing inflammation and macular oedema in the Indian population.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of difluprednate 0.05% against prednisolone 1% eye drops for control of inflammation following phacoemulsification. The adverse effects of both drugs were also evaluated in this retrospective study.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 181 patients operated for age-related cataracts by a single surgeon at a tertiary referral eye hospital between December 2018 and March 2019. Patients received either difluprednate 0.05% emulsion (n=90 eyes) or prednisolone acetate 1% (n=91 eyes) after phacoemulsification with the same brand intraocular lens (IOL) and same phaco machine. The topical medication was initiated one day postoperatively and continued for six weeks in tapering dosage. Pain score (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS), conjunctival hyperemia, anterior chamber (AC) cell grading, corneal oedema, central retinal thickness, subclinical cystoid macular oedema (SCME), intraocular pressures (IOP) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were examined after one week and six weeks of cataract extraction.  Results: There was no statistically significant difference observed with regards to pain score (no pain in any patients after six weeks), conjunctival hyperemia (no hyperemia in any patients after six weeks), AC inflammation (no reaction in any patients), central retinal thickness (234.44 ± 35.75µ vs. 234.8 ± 34.99µ, p-value 0.946), SCME (16.67% vs. 13.19%, p-value 0.511), IOP (16.8 vs. 15.47 mmHg, p-value 0.101) and BCVA (BCVA 6/6 in 57.7% vs. 70.32%, p-value >0.05) between both groups. The mean change in IOP in both the groups at one week (0 ± 4.4 vs. 1.87 ± 3.54, p-value 0.0007) and six weeks (-0.01 ± 5.53 vs. 1.88 ± 4.01, p-value 0.004) was significant.  Conclusion: Both the groups were equivalent with regards to their therapeutic efficacy in controlling postoperative inflammation and restoration of vision following phacoemulsification.

A sustained-release intracanalicular dexamethasone insert (Dextenza) for pediatric cataract surgery

We assess the outcomes of a sustained-release intracanalicular dexamethasone insert (Dextenza) in the treatment of postoperative ocular inflammation in children undergoing cataract surgery. Seventeen eyes of 17 children were analyzed. The anterior chamber was clear in 18% of eyes at 1-2 weeks after surgery. A spike in intraocular pressure requiring intervention was observed in 18% of eyes. Rescue medications using topical steroids were required in 29% of eyes. Our initial experience suggests that the dexamethasone insert reduced or eliminated the need for postoperative steroid drops.

Uveitis Therapy: The Corticosteroid Options

Uveitis is characterized by intraocular inflammation involving the uveal tract; its etiologies generally fall into two broad categories: autoimmune/inflammatory or infectious. Corticosteroids  are a powerful and important class of medications ubiquitous in the treatment of uveitis. They may be given systemically or locally, in the form of topical drops, periocular injection, intravitreal suspension, or intravitreal implant. This review describes each of the currently available corticosteroid treatment options for uveitis, including favorable and unfavorable characteristics of each as well as applicable clinical trials. The main advantage of corticosteroids as a whole is their ability to quickly and effectively control inflammation early on in the course of uveitis. However, they can have serious side effects, whether localized to the eye (such as cataract and elevated intraocular pressure) or systemic (such as osteonecrosis and adrenal insufficiency) and in the majority of cases of uveitis are not an appropriate option for long-term therapy.

Does Cataract Surgery Improve the Progression of Age-Related Macular Degeneration? A Meta-Analysis

Purpose

Cataract and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) are the common causes of blindness in the elderly. Although cataract surgery is the most effective treatment for cataract, some clinicians suspect that such interventions may accelerate the progression of AMD. Therefore, we carried out this meta-analysis to focus on demonstrating the effectiveness and safety of cataract surgery in eyes with AMD.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, and the electronic databases were last searched in January 2019. We planned to include cohort trials of eyes affected by both cataract and AMD in which cataract surgery would be compared to no surgery. Two reviewers independently evaluated the search results against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. 8 trials were included for this meta-analysis.

Results

We used the Stata/12.0 to integrate the data that was extracted from the articles. Eight cohort trials with data from different study populations were included. In random effects model, the relative risk (RR) for the progression of AMD is 1.194 (95% CI 0.897–1.591). As for those grouped according to the follow-up year, the RR for longer than five years was 1.372 (95% CI 1.062–1.772).

Conclusion

We could draw out such a conclusion that there is still a positive correlation between cataract surgery and the progression of AMD, especially for the Asians. However, based on the current results, it is not possible to draw conclusions from existing studies on the impact of cataract surgery on early AMD development.

Comparison of topically administered 0.05% difluprednate and 1% prednisolone acetate for inhibition of aqueocentesis-induced breakdown of the blood-aqueous barrier in healthy dogs

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of 0.05% difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion and 1% prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension for controlling aqueocentesis-induced breakdown of the blood-aqueous barrier in healthy dogs.

ANIMALS

34 healthy dogs.

PROCEDURES

Dogs were allocated to 5 groups (6 to 8 dogs/group) to receive 0.05% difluprednate, 1% prednisolone acetate, or saline (0.9% NaCl) solution (control treatment) in both eyes 2 or 4 times daily. Eye drops were administered topically for 5 consecutive days. Anterior chamber paracentesis (aqueocentesis) was performed in 1 eye on the third day. Automated fluorophotometry was performed immediately before and 20 minutes and 24 and 48 hours after aqueocentesis. Relative fluorescence (RF), defined as fluorescence of the eye that had undergone aqueocentesis divided by fluorescence of the contralateral eye, was calculated to help control for variation among dogs.

RESULTS

Mean RF was significantly lower at 24 hours after aqueocentesis in dogs treated twice daily with 0.05% difluprednate or 4 times daily with 1% prednisolone acetate than in dogs receiving the control treatment. At 48 hours after aqueocentesis, mean RF was significantly lower in dogs treated 4 times daily with 1% prednisolone acetate than in control dogs. Mean RF differed over time in dogs treated 4 times daily with 0.05% difluprednate but did not differ over time for any of the other treatments.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

All 4 treatments were effective for reducing aqueocentesis-induced anterior uveitis in healthy dogs regardless of the drug or frequency of administration. Topical ophthalmic administration of 0.05% difluprednate may be a viable treatment option for dogs with anterior uveitis and warrants further study.

Difluprednate 0.05% versus Prednisolone Acetate Post-Phacoemulsification for Inflammation and Pain: An Efficacy and Safety Clinical Trial

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of difluprednate 0.05% (PRO-145) versus prednisolone acetate 1% (Prednefrin^® SF), for management of postoperative inflammation and pain, after cataract surgery.

Methods

This was a Phase III, multicenter, prospective, double-blind, clinical trial. Intent-to-treat population included 178 post-phacoemulsification patients that were assigned to receive either PRO-145, or prednisolone. One day after unilateral eye surgery, patients instilled a drop 4 times a day for 14 days (then tapering the dose downward for 14 days). The primary efficacy endpoints were anterior chamber (AC) cell grade and flare. Other parameters measured included: retinal central thickness (measured via OCT), conjunctival hyperemia, edema, pain and photophobia. Tolerability and safety were assessed through burning, itching, foreign body sensation, visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and incidence of adverse events (AE).

Results

A total of 171 subjects were randomized (1:1) and completed the study. Compared to day 1, there was a significant improvement in the AC cell count and flare in both groups by the final visit (80.2% vs 88.4%, p=1.000). Conjunctival hyperemia improved in a similar fashion (81.2% vs 79%, p=0.234) in both PRO-145 and prednisolone groups, without differences between them. This was also observed for edema (82.4% vs 82.5%, p=0.246), pain (15.3% vs 7%, p=0.497) and photophobia (16.4% vs 15.1%, p=0.246), respectively. There was no significant difference between treatments for any tolerability parameter studied. Finally, at the 4-week postoperative visit, there were no significant differences between treatments for VA, IOP and AE results (p-values; 0.095, 0.053 and 0.099, respectively).

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that PRO-145 is as effective and safe as prednisolone acetate in treating postoperative inflammation and pain in patients undergoing phacoemulsification. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03693989.

Loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% vs prednisolone acetate suspension 1% for the treatment of inflammation after cataract surgery in children

PURPOSE

To compare loteprednol etabonate (LE) gel 0.5% with prednisolone acetate suspension (PA) 1% for the treatment of inflammation after cataract surgery in children.

SETTING

Eleven sites in the United States.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, noninferiority study.

METHODS

Eligible patients were aged 11 years or younger and candidates for routine, uncomplicated cataract surgery. Patients were randomized to a 4-week postsurgical regimen with LE gel 0.5% or PA 1%, twice on the day of surgery, 4 times daily for 2 weeks, twice daily for 1 week, and once daily for 1 week. Assessments included anterior chamber (AC) cells/flare, anterior chamber inflammation (ACI), synechiae, precipitates on the intraocular lens/cornea, visual acuity, and intraocular pressure.

RESULTS

The intent-to-treat population comprised 105 patients (LE gel, n = 53; PA 1%, n = 52) including 52 patients aged 3 years or younger. Patients achieved a similar mean ACI grade on postoperative day 14 (primary efficacy endpoint) whether treated with LE gel 0.5% or PA 1% (difference = 0.006, 2-sided 95% CI, -0.281 to 0.292). Similar ACI outcomes additionally were observed in patients aged 3 years or younger. LE gel 0.5% and PA 1% also appeared equally effective in resolving inflammation at all visits (days 7, 14, and 28 postsurgery), based on categorical distributions of ACI, AC cells, and AC flare scores/grades (P ≥ .06). Synechiae and corneal/IOL precipitates occurred infrequently with no significant differences between groups. No safety or tolerability concerns were identified, including no treatment-related IOP increases.

CONCLUSIONS

LE gel 0.5% was safe and effective in treating pediatric postcataract surgical inflammation, with similar outcomes as PA 1%.

Intracameral tenecteplase during phacoemulsification in rabbits: clinical assessment of the anterior segment and biochemical analysis of the aqueous humor

Abstract To evaluate the use of tenecteplase in transoperative phacoemulsification in healthy rabbits, the study was carried out with fifteen New Zealand rabbits, divided into three groups: control group (CG), untreated group (UG) and treated group (TG). UG and TG were operated by phacoemulsification and TG received 50 µg / 0.3 mL of intracameral tenecteplase. The postoperative evaluations were 24 h, 72 h, 7 days, 15 days and 21 days. In TP21 the animals were submitted to euthanasia and aqueous humor samples were collected. No significant differences were observed in the clinical evaluations between CG and TG in relation to incidence rates of intraocular pressure (IOP), corneal edema, fibrin deposits, hyphema, aqueous flare and synechia. In the physicochemical evaluation of the aqueous humor, there were no significant differences between the three groups in relation to pH values and concentrations of chloride ions. The aqueous humor density values were statistically different between CG and the other groups. In the histological evaluation, there were no significant differences between the groups. The use of tenecteplase in transoperative phacoemulsification in rabbits did not present significant differences in terms of clinical, physicochemical and histological parameters.

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration is associated with cataract surgery

PURPOSE

This retrospective cohort study examines the association between cataract surgery and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) during 5-year follow-up using population-based claims data.

METHODS

We analysed data sourced from the Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005. The study included 3465 patients who had undergone cataract operations and did not have a diagnosis of AMD before or on the surgery date (study group), and 10 395 age- and sex-matched comparison patients selected randomly from the remaining patients without an AMD diagnosis before the index date. We tracked the claims of each patient for a 5-year period to identify patients with a subsequent diagnosis of neovascular AMD.

RESULTS

The incidence rate of neovascular AMD was 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-1.14) per 1000 person-years among all sampled patients, 1.60 (95% CI: 1.04-2.36) among the cataract surgery patients and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.43-0.91) among comparison patients (p < 0.001). Stratified Cox proportional analysis showed that relative to the comparison cohort, the adjusted hazard ratio for neovascular AMD during 5-year follow-up was 2.68 (95% CI: 1.55-4.66) for patients who had undergone cataract operation. We censored those who died during follow-up period and adjusted for patients' monthly income, geographical location, urbanization level, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and hyperlipidaemia.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated epidemiological evidence of a link between cataract surgery and neovascular AMD during a 5-year follow-up period.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% and Topical Dexamethasone 1% in Post-Vitrectomy Inflammation

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of postoperative topical loteprednol etabonate (LE) 0.5% with dexamethasone (DEX) 0.1% for the treatment of inflammation following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).

METHODS

A total of 150 eyes of 150 patients who underwent transconjunctival PPV for various diagnoses were included in this prospective, randomized study. The patients were assigned into two groups as Group LE (n = 75) and Group DEX (n = 75). Intraocular inflammation, intraocular pressure (IOP), and the intensity of postoperative pain were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The mean IOP was higher in the patients treated with DEX (p > 0.05). The need for anti-glaucoma medications was significantly lower in Group LE (5.3%) than in Group DEX (17.3%) (p = 0.020). Tyndall scores were less in Group DEX at postoperative Days 1 (p = 0.01) and 3 (p = 0.017). On Day 1, it was more likely for patients to have mild or moderate pain in Group LE (p < 0.001). On Day 3, the number of the patients with no pain was higher in Group DEX (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Although DEX is more effective in the early postoperative days, LE appears to be as effective in controlling inflammatory response following PPV in the long-term. Topical LE is associated with less increase in the IOP and a lower need for anti-glaucoma medications.

Cyclodextrin-containing hydrogels as an intraocular lens for sustained drug release

To improve the efficacy of anti-inflammatory factors in patients who undergo cataract surgery, poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-co-methyl methacrylate) (p(HEMA-co-MMA)) hydrogels containing β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) (pHEMA/MMA/β-CD) were designed and prepared as intraocular lens (IOLs) biomaterials that could be loaded with and achieve the sustained release of dexamethasone. A series of pHEMA/MMA/β-CD copolymers containing different ratios of β-CD (range, 2.77 to 10.24 wt.%) were obtained using thermal polymerization. The polymers had high transmittance at visible wavelengths and good biocompatibility with mouse connective tissue fibroblasts. Drug loading and release studies demonstrated that introducing β-CD into hydrogels increased loading efficiency and achieved the sustained release of the drug. Administering β-CD via hydrogels increased the equilibrium swelling ratio, elastic modulus and tensile strength. In addition, β-CD increased the hydrophilicity of the hydrogels, resulting in a lower water contact angle and higher cellular adhesion to the hydrogels. In summary, pHEMA/MMA/β-CD hydrogels show great potential as IOL biomaterials that are capable of maintaining the sustained release of anti-inflammatory drugs after cataract surgery.

Innovations in pediatric cataract surgery

Advances in technology have made surgery in children safer and faster. The management of pediatric cataract has made rapid progress in the past decade with the availability of safer anesthesia, newer technique's, more predictable intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation, a better understanding of neurobiology, genetics, amblyopia management, improved IOL designs for preventing visual axis opacification, and adjuvant postoperative care. Modern vitrectomy machines with minimally invasive instruments, radiofrequency, diathermy, and plasma blades help immensely in complicated cases. Preoperative evaluation with ultrasound biomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows better planning of surgical procedure. The future holds good for stem cell research, customized OCT, and Zepto (precision pulse capsulotomy).

To Study the Efficacy of Difluprednate Ophthalmic Emulsion and Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic Suspension on Post-operative Inflammation in Cataract Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Senile cataract is the most common cause of visual impairment. Removal of cataract and implantation of intraocular lens implantation (IOL) is the main surgical approach for cataract. The major block in quick visual rehabilitation of the patient is post-operative inflammation. To limit post-operative inflammation corticosteroids drugs are used in routine prophylactically. Topical prednisolone acetate 1% and betamethasone 0.1% remain gold standard to control post-operative inflammation but newer drugs like difluprednate, loteprednol are also effective in controlling inflammation.

AIM

To study the efficacy of difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion and prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension on Post-operative inflammation in cataract surgery (clear corneal phacoemulsification with foldable IOL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was carried out on 100 patients having visually significant cataract requiring surgery, clear corneal phacoemulsification with foldable intraocular lens implantation was done in all patients. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. In group A topical 1% prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension was administered six times a day Post-operatively. In group B 0.05% difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion was administered six times a day post-operatively. Efficacy of drug was evaluated in terms of decrease in ocular pain, anterior chamber reaction in the form of aqueous cells and flare and final visual acuity at 4 weeks.

RESULTS

In this study, 92% of patients in group A and 90% of patients in group B had BCVA 6/6. None of the patients in group A had ocular pain. In group B, 96% patients had no ocular pain. Remaining 4% had mild discomfort but required no medication. 98% of patients in group A and 100% of patients in group B presented with clearance of aqueous cells at the end of study. Only 2% of patients in group A had showed cell score (±).

CONCLUSION

Though prednisolone acetate has been the gold standard anti inflammatory agent, 0.05% Difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion is equally effective in treatment of post-operative inflammation. Difluprednate have added an advantage of uniform drug dosage and absence of harmful preservative.

A retrospective analysis of intraocular pressure changes after cataract surgery with the use of prednisolone acetate 1% versus difluprednate 0.05%

Purpose

To compare the effect of topical prednisolone acetate 1% (PA) used after routine cataract surgery to the effect of difluprednate 0.05% (DFBA) used for the same indication on intraocular pressure (IOP).

Methods

An electronic query was created to gather information from all cataract surgeries between January 2010 and January 2015 within the electronic health record database at Barnet Dulaney Perkins, a multicenter, multiphysician private practice in Phoenix, Arizona. Information collected included age, sex, diabetes status, glaucoma history, medication regimen (use of PA or DFBA), and IOP before surgery, 5–10 days postoperatively (TP1) and 3–6 weeks postoperatively (TP2). Postoperative IOP measurements were compared to baseline IOP measurement in each patient.

Results

Regardless of steroid used, all patients in this study experienced an increase in IOP within TP1 and returned to baseline IOP (±2.0 mmHg) by TP2. Patients who received DFBA showed a statistically significant increase in IOP at TP1 compared to those on PA (P<0.001) with the mean IOP an average 0.60 mmHg higher (95% CI =0.3, 0.9). The odds ratio of a clinically significantly increased IOP at TP1 (defined as overall IOP ≥21 mmHg and an increase of ≥10 mmHg) in DFBA-treated patients was 1.84 (95% CI =1.4, 2.6). In patients treated with PA, 3% reached a significantly increased IOP, compared to 4.4% of patients in the DFBA group (P<0.05). Risk factors for increased IOP were identified, and include advanced age (>75) (P<0.005) and a history of glaucoma (P<0.001).

Conclusion

In postoperative cataract patients, use of DFBA increased the risk of a clinically significant IOP increase.