Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography findings of the macula in 500 consecutive patients with uveitis

Corticosteroids for the Management of Uveitic Macular Edema: A Comprehensive Review

Uveitis, which refers to the inflammation of the uveal tract and surrounding structures in the eye, poses a significant risk of vision impairment, with macular edema (UME) being a prevalent complication. The current statement reviews UME's prevalence, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management strategies, focusing on the utility of systemic and local corticosteroid therapy. Corticosteroids, with their multifaceted effects on inflammatory pathways, serve as the cornerstone of UME treatment. Various administration routes, including topical, periocular, intraocular, and systemic, are employed based on the anatomical type and severity of inflammation. The efficacy of different corticosteroid formulations, such as difluprednate, triamcinolone acetonide, dexamethasone implant, and fluocinolone acetonide implant, is evaluated through clinical trials and retrospective studies. Additionally, the role of corticosteroid-sparing treatments, including antimetabolites like methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil, is explored. Emerging techniques, such as suprachoroidal space triamcinolone acetonide administration, offer promising alternatives for managing UME. Through a thorough examination of current evidence, this review provides valuable insights into optimizing the management of UME and improving visual outcomes in patients with uveitis.

Epiretinal membranes in patients with uveitis: an update on the current state of management

PURPOSE

This review aims to summarize the current knowledge concerning the clinical features, diagnostic work-up, and therapeutic approach of uveitic epiretinal membranes (ERM).

METHODS

A thorough investigation of the literature was conducted using the PubMed database. Additionally, a complementary search was carried out on Google Scholar to ensure the inclusion of all relevant items in the collection.

RESULTS

ERM is an abnormal layer at the vitreoretinal interface, resulting from myofibroblastic cell proliferation along the inner surface of the central retina, causing visual impairment. Known by various names, ERM has diverse causes, including idiopathic or secondary factors, with ophthalmic imaging techniques like OCT improving detection. In uveitis, ERM occurrence is common, and surgical intervention involves pars plana vitrectomy with ERM peeling, although debates persist on optimal approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathological studies and OCT advancements improved ERM understanding, revealing a diverse group of diseases without a unified model. Consensus supports surgery for uveitic ERM in progressive cases, but variability requires careful consideration and effective inflammation management. OCT biomarkers, deep learning, and surgical advances may enhance outcomes, and medical interventions and robotics show promise for early ERM intervention.

Risk factors for failing sub-Tenon's triamcinolone acetonide for uveitic macular edema

BACKGROUND

Sub-Tenon's triamcinolone acetonide (STA) is less effective than intravitreal corticosteroids in the treatment of uveitic macular edema (ME), but does have some relative advantages, including substantially lower cost and decreased risk of post-injection ocular hypertension. It would be useful for clinicians to know which eyes may respond well to STA and not necessarily require intravitreal therapy. The objective of this study is to identify risk factors for failing STA for the treatment of uveitic ME.

MAIN BODY

A retrospective cohort study was performed. Medical records were reviewed of patients who underwent STA for the treatment of uveitic ME between January 1, 2013, and July 31, 2022, at the University of Colorado Hospital. Uveitic ME was defined by a central subfield thickness (CST) greater than 320 μm or the presence of intra-retinal cystoid spaces on optical coherence tomography (OCT), or by the presence of petaloid macular leakage on fluorescein angiography (FA). Data collected included age, race/ethnicity, sex, history of diabetes mellitus, anatomic classification of uveitis, use of corticosteroids, use of immunomodulatory therapy, presence of intra-retinal fluid on OCT, CST on OCT, and presence of petaloid macular leakage on FA. STA failure was defined as the need for additional therapy within 12 weeks of STA due to persistent or worsening uveitic ME. One hundred eighty eyes from 131 patients were included. Forty-two eyes (23.3%) were considered treatment failures. In univariate and multivariable analysis, higher baseline CST was associated with a higher likelihood of failing STA (OR 1.17 for each 30 μm increase in CST, P = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

STA, while not as potent as intravitreal corticosteroids for the treatment of uveitic ME, was still an effective therapy, particularly for patients with lower baseline CST. Given its lower side effect profile and cost compared to intravitreal treatments, clinicians could consider STA as an initial treatment for mild uveitic ME.

Intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide 0.19 mg (ILUVIEN®) in patients with non-infectious uveitis: real-world effectiveness and safety outcomes at 12 months

PURPOSE

This study assessed the effectiveness of the 0.19-mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant by multimodal measurements in patients with non-infectious uveitis (NIU) in a real-world setting in Spain.

METHODS

A prospective study of patients who had NIU including uveitic macular oedema (UME) with ≥ 12 months follow-up was done. Exclusion criteria include infectious uveitis and uncontrolled glaucoma or ocular hypertension requiring more than 2 medications. Effectiveness was assessed using a multicomponent outcome measure that included nine outcomes. Effectiveness was defined as all components being met at every timepoint. Secondary outcome measures were onset or progression of glaucoma and investigator-reported adverse events.

RESULTS

Twenty-six eyes from 22 patients were included, with 96.2% having an indication including UME. During the 12-month study, the FAc implant was effective in 15 (57.7%) eyes, reaching effectiveness as soon as 2 weeks post-implantation. Mean best-corrected visual acuity and mean central macular thickness (CMT) were significantly improved vs. baseline at all timepoints (all comparisons p < 0.01). During the 12-month study, inflammation markers (anterior chamber cells and vitreous haze) had also significantly declined. Factors predicting effectiveness at month 12 were systemic corticosteroid dose pre-FAc, higher immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) load at baseline and thicker retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) at baseline (all p < 0.05). Factors predicting failure were male gender, thinner RNFL at baseline and treatment ineffectiveness at 1 month (all p < 0.05). In parallel, corticosteroid and IMT use also declined significantly. No significant increase in IOP was detected.

CONCLUSION

The FAc implant is safe and effective at treating NIU over 12 months in a real-world setting in Spain.

Mechanisms of macular edema

Macular edema is the pathological accumulation of fluid in the central retina. It is a complication of many retinal diseases, including diabetic retinopathy, retinal vascular occlusions and uveitis, among others. Macular edema causes decreased visual acuity and, when chronic or refractory, can cause severe and permanent visual impairment and blindness. In most instances, it develops due to dysregulation of the blood-retinal barrier which permits infiltration of the retinal tissue by proteins and other solutes that are normally retained in the blood. The increase in osmotic pressure in the tissue drives fluid accumulation. Current treatments include vascular endothelial growth factor blockers, corticosteroids, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. These treatments target vasoactive and inflammatory mediators that cause disruption to the blood-retinal barrier. In this review, a clinical overview of macular edema is provided, mechanisms of disease are discussed, highlighting processes targeted by current treatments, and areas of opportunity for future research are identified.

Microvascular changes in the recurrent cystoid macular edema secondary to posterior noninfectious uveitis on optical coherence tomography angiography

Background

Posterior uveitis represents the second most frequent type of uveitis (15–30% of all uveitis). Noninfectious posterior uveitis complicated with secondary cystoid macular edema (CME) affects the visual prognosis negatively. The objective of the current study is to detect possible microvascular changes causing relapsing uveitis-related CME using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

Methods

This is an interventional, observational, retrospective study with 1 year follow-up. Patients with noninfectious, posterior uveitis-related CME undergoing dexamethasone (DEX) implant were evaluated. Following the DEX-implant were carried out control visits after 1 month, 2-months, 4-months, 6-months, and for up 1-year. A total of 76 eyes of 38 consecutive patients with noninfectious posterior uveitis were enrolled (consecutive sample). Complicated noninfectious posterior uveitis with secondary CME was diagnosed in 56 eyes of uveitis patients (73.7%) and reviewed.

Results

Our investigation showed (1) a reduction in superficial vessel plexus (SVP) measurements within 2-month (84%), reaching 96.4% for up 1-year, (2) an irregular profile of SVP in 69.6% of cases, persisting for up 1-year; relapsing uveitis-related CME eyes with irregular superficial foveal avascular zone (FAZ) profile were in 51%, while the SVP measurements reestablished in 100% of cases. Conversely, (3) the deep vascular plexus (DVP) parameters restored in a lower number of eyes within the 2-month (39.3%), remaining abnormal in 46.4% of cases for up 1-year; despite DVP restored in 53.6% of cases for up 1 year, (4) a capillary rarefaction ring around the FAZ appeared in 80.4% of cases; the relapsing uveitis-related CME eyes with abnormal DVP parameters were present in 41% of cases, of which 92.1% showed a rarefaction ring had abnormal DVP.

Conclusions

The use of OCTA enabled the evaluation in detail of retinal microvascular changes. We suggested that the possibility of the recurrence of the uveitis-related CME depends on the persistence of modifications of the superficial and deep layers. In this regard, we propose to implement the current imaging armamentarium with OCTA for the follow-up of patients with noninfectious uveitis-related CME.

Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for the Treatment of Macular Edema and Uveitis: A Comprehensive Narrative Review

Purpose

The purpose of this review article is to provide a comprehensive review of the current applications of intravitreal DEX implant (Ozurdex^®, Allergan Inc, Irvine, CA) for a variety of ophthalmic conditions – ranging from FDA approved indications to off-label uses. We have attempted to provide relevant evidence from the literature to help a reader develop an understanding of the biological and pharmacokinetic properties of DEX implant, its uses, and potential side effects.

Methods

PubMed searches were performed using the terms “Ozurdex”, or “intravitreal DEX implant”, AND “retinal vein occlusion”, or “diabetic macular edema”, or “uveitis”. The search was performed in July of 2021, with an additional search in October 2021. All original English language articles were considered for this review.

Results

DEX implant has evidence of efficacy in a variety of clinical situations including macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion, diabetes, uveitis, and others. Safety concerns include cataract formation and progression, intraocular pressure elevation, complications related to intravitreal injection, and opportunistic infections secondary to steroid-induced immune suppression.

Conclusion

DEX implant is a useful tool in the management of several retinal disorders. Further studies are needed for head-to-head comparison with other treatment modalities and to determine its precise place in clinical practice.

Targeted Medical History and Diagnostic Testing in Uveitis

Uveitis is a collective term for a variety of different intraocular inflammations. The underlying etiologies vary greatly depending on the uveitis subtype, and in particular the anatomical focus. The most common forms of anterior uveitis are acute fibrinous unilateral uveitis, often associated with the HLA-B27 haplotype, and granulomatous inflammation, typically associated with sarcoidosis or herpes infections. Intermediate uveitis is usually idiopathic in nature but can also be associated with multiple sclerosis or sarcoidosis, while vitreoretinal lymphoma must also be considered as a masquerade syndrome in patients aged over 45. Posterior uveitis, on the other hand, as well as retinal vasculitis and panuveitis, have a very broad variety of etiologies; these can, however, be narrowed down through a similar findings-centered approach. Retinitis, for example, is often associated with infections (Toxoplasma gondii and viruses of the herpes group), whereas chorioditis is frequently idiopathic, although infections such as tuberculosis may occur. Therefore, the medical history and laboratory diagnosis should be tailored in patients with uveitis based on the anatomic focus of inflammation (anterior, intermediate, or posterior uveitis, or panuveitis) and the clinical picture (e.g., granulomatous versus nongranulomatous).

A comparison of long-term results after Baerveldt 250 implantation in advanced uveitic vs. other forms of glaucoma

INTRODUCTION

Uveitic glaucoma remains challenging despite medical and surgical advancements and can potentially lead to blindness if left uncontrolled. Conservative alternatives as well as microinvasive surgeries can postpone the necessity of a highly invasive intervention. However, such procedures are still necessary to treat some refractive glaucoma cases. Since previous studies have reported excellent results following the primary implantation of glaucoma drainage devices, it was our study's aim to evaluate long-term results following a Baerveldt 250 implantation in highly complex and surgically burdened uveitic glaucoma eyes (UG) and compare these to a similar population suffering from other forms of glaucoma (OFG).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all eyes (UG vs. OFG) following a Baerveldt 250 implant between 2013 and 2019. Efficacy parameters as well as post-operative complication data were extracted from our electronic data system for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 62 eyes were included in our study (24 UG and 38 OFG). UG baseline mean IOP was 35.04 mmHg (± 11.85 mmHg) with 3.08 (± 1.13) topical agents, and OFG was 32.63 mmHg (± 7.74 mmHg) with 2.68 (± 1.28) topical agents. A majority of eyes also required systemic acetazolamide (UG: 79% OFG: 87%) and had undergone at least one glaucoma-related operation prior to the Baerveldt 250 implant ((UG: 1.21 (± 0.66)), OFG: 1.74 (± 1.33)). At the median follow-up period (UG 592, OFG 764 days), 52.5%/32.5% of UG/OFG cases showed qualified success (IOP below 21 mmHg with either topical or/and systemic medication), 15%/30% no longer required topical medication, and 47.5% /47.5% were free of acetazolamide systemically. Moreover, 75%/72.5% of eyes experienced no further pressure-related surgical event. Although sight-threatening complications such as corneal and macular edema were reported in both groups, most either maintained or improved their visual acuity at the last follow-up (58.33%/57.89%).

CONCLUSION

The Baerveldt 250 implant is shown to be both effective and safe for advanced glaucoma cases in uveitis and other forms. No further glaucoma-related surgery is required in the majority of eyes in either group within a follow-up period of almost 2 years. Despite sight-threatening complications such as macular and corneal edema, visual acuity can be either maintained or improved in most eyes.

Relationship of Epiretinal Membrane Formation and Macular Edema Development in a Large Cohort of Uveitic Eyes

Purpose: To identify the temporal relationship and clinical characteristics of epiretinal membrane (ERM) and macular edema (ME) formation in uveitic eyes.Methods: A total of 269 subjects (444 uveitic eyes) met study inclusion criteria. Comprehensive ophthalmic examination, spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and clinical testing were carried out.Results: Of the 444 uveitic eyes, 229 eyes (51.6%) developed an ERM, whereas 87 eyes (19.1%) developed ME. The odds ratios (ORs) of systemic disease causing uveitis and resulting in ERM and ME were significantly higher in posterior uveitis (OR 6.56, 95% CI 2.98-14.46; p < .0001) and panuveitis (OR 10.09, 95% CI 4.05-25.15; p < .0001). Temporal analysis revealed that an ERM was noted concurrently or prior to ME development in 93.8% of eyes.Conclusions: ERM and ME are primarily observed in posterior uveitis and panuveitis associated with systemic diseases. The temporal relationship highlights the importance of characterization of ERM as it relates to the development of uveitic ME.

Structural Endpoints and Outcome Measures in Uveitis

Most uveitis entities are rare diseases but, taken together, are responsible for 5-10% of worldwide visual impairment which largely affects persons of working age. As with many rare diseases, there is a lack of high-level evidence regarding its clinical management, partly due to a dearth of reliable and objective quantitative endpoints for clinical trials. This review provides an overview of available structural outcome measures for uveitis disease activity and damage in an anatomical order from the anterior to the posterior segment of the eye. While there is a multitude of available structural outcome measures, not all might qualify as endpoints for clinical uveitis trials, and thorough testing of applicability is warranted. Furthermore, a consensus on endpoint definition, standardization, and "core outcomes" is required. As stipulated by regulatory agencies, endpoints should be precisely defined, clinically important, internally consistent, reliable, responsive to treatment, and relevant for the respective subtype of uveitis. Out of all modalities used for assessment of the reviewed structural outcome measures, optical coherence tomography, color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, and fluorescein/indocyanine green angiography represent current "core modalities" for reliable and objective quantification of uveitis outcome measures, based on their practical availability and the evidence provided so far.

En face optical coherence tomography patterns in patients with angiographically documented uveitic macular edema: a cross-sectional retrospective study

PURPOSE

To elucidate the en face optical coherence tomography (OCT) patterns of macular edema in eyes with angiographically documented uveitic macular edema (UME) and compare visual acuity (VA), OCT and OCT-angiography (OCT-A) parameters among the morphological subgroups.

METHODS

Thirty-nine eyes of 29 patients with angiographically proven UME were enrolled into the study. All patients underwent comprehensive ophthalmological examination including structural OCT and OCT-A in addition to fluorescein angiography. Eyes with UME were divided into three subgroups (petaloid, sunflower and spoke-wheel pattern) with the help of en face OCT imaging.

RESULTS

Posterior uveitis was the most common type of uveitis (17 patients; 58.7%), followed by panuveitis (11 patients; 37.9%) and then intermediate uveitis (1 patient; 3.4%). Underlying causes of uveitis were Behçet's disease (13 patients; 44.8%), idiopathic (11 patients; 37.9%), rheumatoid arthritis (2 patients; 6.9%), sarcoidosis (1 patient; 3.4%), inflammatory polyarthritis (1 patient; 3.4%) and psoriatic arthritis (1 patient; 3.4%). The most common en face OCT pattern was petaloid type (25 of 39 eyes; 64.1%). Eleven eyes (28.2%) had sunflower pattern and three (7.7%) spoke-wheel pattern. There were no statistically significant difference among the subgroups regarding the age, VA, central macular thickness and vessel density.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals three morphological en face OCT patterns in eyes with UME and en face OCT may find a niche in the UME classification with the accumulation of experience among the uveitis experts.

Surgical management of post-uveitic epiretinal membranes

PURPOSE

Previous reports described unfavorable visual outcomes after surgery for uveitic macular pucker. Our goal was to demonstrate that patients with history of uveitis may benefit from vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane if executed under appropriate circumstances.

METHODS

We performed pars plana vitrectomy with ERM and ILM peeling in patients with post-uveitic macular pucker who did not show signs of ocular inflammation for at least 3 months after the suspension of immunosuppressive therapy. Visual acuity, central macular thickness at OCT, ocular inflammation, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-six eyes were operated. Mean duration of follow-up was 67 months. Visual acuity significantly improved from 20/80 to 20/40 after surgery. Vision increased in 20 (77%), remained stable in 4 (15%), and decreased in 2 (8%) eyes. Best-corrected visual acuity ameliorated by at least 2 ETDRS lines in 14 eyes (54%). Contingency analysis did not show any statistical difference among the different types of uveitis (p = 0.46). Mean central foveal thickness improved postoperatively (428 ± 104 vs 328 ± 130 microns; p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Patients with uveitic epiretinal membrane benefit from vitrectomy with membranectomy if operated when intraocular inflammation had subsided.

The impact of central foveal thickness and integrity of the outer retinal layers in the visual outcome of uveitic macular edema

Background

To analyze the relationship between the central foveal thickness (CFT) and the integrity of the ellipsoid portion of inner segments (EPIS) and interdigitating zone (IZ) retinal layers in the visual outcome of uveitic macular edema (UME).

Methods

Prospective, observational, and cross-sectional study of eyes with UME. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) macular morphological pattern, CFT, and integrity of the outer retinal layers were analyzed. We arranged the data by EPIS or IZ integrity and contrasted it with student t-test (quantitative variables) and Fisher exact test or χ² distribution (categorical variables) to evaluate visual impairment and retinal measures. Receiver operator curve (ROC) estimation and logistic regression (probit) assessed if the sample´s variance could be associated with IZ or EPIS integrity.

Results

We included 145 SD-OCT macular scans from 45 patients at different stages of UME. Cystoid macular edema (CME) increased the risk of severe (P ≤ 0.0162) and moderate visual loss (P ≤ 0.0032). The highest CFT values occurred in patients with moderate (478.11 ± 167.62 μm) and severe (449.4 ± 224.86 μm) visual loss. Of all morphological patterns of macular edema, only CME showed a statistically significant relationship with severe visual impairment (44.92%, p = 0.0035, OR 4.29 [1.62–11.4]). Likewise, an increased probability of severe visual loss correlated negatively with both, IZ (37.93%, P ≤ 0.001, OR 10.02) and EPIS (38.98%, P ≤ 0.001, OR 13.1) disruption. A CFT > 337 μm showed a higher probability of IZ (AUROC = 0.7341, SEN 77.59%, ESP 65.52) and EPIS (AUROC = 0.7489, SEN 76.37%, ESP 65.12%) loss of integrity. Moreover, when BCVA reached 0.44 LogMAR (≤ 20/50 Snellen eq.), it was more likely to have IZ (AUROC = 0.8706, ESP 88.51%, SEN 77.59%) and EPIS (AUROC = 0.8898, ESP 88.3%, SEN 76.27) disruption.

Conclusions

Significantly increased CFT has a higher probability for EPIS and IZ disruption, which significantly increases the risk for irreversible visual loss in eyes with UME. Evaluating these layers’ integrity by optical coherence tomography helps predict the visual outcome and make the right therapeutic decisions.

Trial registration The study was registered on April 13, 2020, at the Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey Research Committee (License No. COFEPRIS 20 CI 19 039 002), project registration No. P000338-CAVICaREMU-CI-CR002, and the Ethics Committee (License No. CONBIOETICA 19 CEI 011-2016-10-17), project registration No. P000338-CAVICaREMU-CEIC-CR002

[Application of high-resolution optical coherence tomography for visualization of eye structures in uveitis of different localization]

The article presents an analysis of publications in main Russian and foreign journals devoted to the use of optical coherence tomography in intravital visualization of the structures of the eye for diagnosis, assessment of the changes during relapses, recovery and remission stages, as well as the effectiveness of treatment for uveitis of different localization. It describes in detail the results of studies conducted using spectral optical coherence tomography, changes in the anterior chamber and cornea in uveitis of the anterior localization, morphological changes in the vitreous body, vitreomacular interface, retina, choroid and optic disc in the anterior and posterior localization of inflammation, and presents the features of OCT diagnosis in a number of nosological forms of uveitis based on the literature data.

Spectral domain optical coherence tomography findings of patients with pars planitis and risk factors affecting visual acuity

PURPOSE

To evaluate spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) findings of 42 eyes with pars planitis and to identify risk factors affecting visual acuity.

METHODS

Medical records and SD-OCT findings were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.248 ± 0.3 on the logMAR scale at baseline. SD-OCT findings included epiretinal membrane (ERM) in 16 (38.1%) eyes, loss of normal foveal contour appearance in 8 (19.0%), ellipsoid zone (EZ) damage in 5 (11.9%), external limiting membrane (ELM) damage in 3 (7.1%), disruption of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in 2 (4.8%), and macular atrophy in 1 (2.4%). There was macular edema in 10 (23.8%) eyes [cystoid macular edema (CME) in 8 (19.0%), diffuse macular edema (DME) in 6 (14.3%), and serous retinal detachment in 2 (4.8%)]. The mean central macular thickness (CMT) was 272.1 ± 319.5 μm. Patients were followed up for a mean of 50.6 ± 36.7 months. Mean BCVA was 0.210 ± 0.3 at the final evaluation. SD-OCT findings included ERM in 28 (66.7%) eyes, EZ damage in 6 (14.3%), ELM damage in 3 (7.1%), disruption of RPE in 4 (9.5%), loss of normal foveal contour appearance in 12 (28.6%), and macular atrophy in 2 (4.8%). There was CME and/or DME in 6 (14.3%) eyes. The mean CMT was 238 ± 220.9 μm and was significantly lower than the baseline (p < 0.001). According to multivariate linear regression analysis, the presence of DME, and loss of normal foveal contour appearance at baseline were the independent factors associated with BCVA at the final examination (B = 0.726, p < 0.001; B = 0.766, p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

DME and loss of normal foveal contour appearance were more likely to have adverse effects on visual acuity.

Advances and potential new developments in imaging techniques for posterior uveitis. Part 1: noninvasive imaging methods

The aim of this review was to identify the imaging methods at our disposal to optimally manage posterior uveitis at the present time. The focus was put on methods that have become available since the 1990s, some 30 years after fluorescein angiography had revolutionized imaging of posterior uveitis in particular imaging of the retinal vascular structures in the 1960s. We have focussed our review on precise imaging methods that have been standardized and validated and can be used universally thanks to commercially produced and available instruments for the diagnosis and follow-up of posterior uveitis. The first part of this imaging review will deal with noninvasive imaging methods, focusing on fundus autofluorescence and optical coherence tomography as well as recent developments in imaging of the posterior segment.

Macular edema associated with non-infectious uveitis: pathophysiology, etiology, prevalence, impact and management challenges

Macular edema (ME) is the most common sight-threatening complication in uveitis. The diagnostic and therapeutic management of the uveitic macular edema (UME) might be challenging due to the complex diagnostic workup and the difficulties physicians face to find the underlying cause, and due to its usually recurrent nature and the fact that it can be refractory to conventional treatment. Some of the mild cases can be treated with topical steroids, which can be combined with non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs. However, immunomodulators such as methotrexate, tacrolimus, azathioprine, cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil together with anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF alpha) monoclonal antibodies such as adalimumab and infliximab, may be required to control the inflammation and the associated ME in refractory cases, or when an underlying disease is present. This review of the literature will focus mostly on the non-infectious UME.

RESPONSE OF INFLAMMATORY CYSTOID MACULAR EDEMA TO TREATMENT USING ORAL ACETAZOLAMIDE

PURPOSE

To determine the treatment effect of oral acetazolamide on refractory inflammatory macular edema.

METHODS

A retrospective review of identified patients with uveitic or pseudophakic macular edema treated using acetazolamide between 2007 and 2014. Visual acuity and central macular subfield thickness was determined at baseline and at first follow-up. Baseline optical coherence tomography features were analyzed as predictors of acetazolamide response.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (19 eyes) of 61 screened met all criteria. Mean age was 57.9 years (19.7-81.1). The most common diagnosis was idiopathic uveitis (n = 6, 31.6%). Mean uveitis duration was 4.4 years (0.2-27.5). Average central macular subfield thickness decreased significantly (from 471.8 ± 110.6 μm to 358.3 ± 50.4 μm) (P < 0.0001). Average visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) improved significantly from 20/54 (0.43 ± 0.25) to 20/37 (0.27 ± 0.16) (P = 0.003). Pretreatment optical coherence tomographies demonstrated intraretinal fluid (n = 19, 100%), subretinal fluid (n = 8, 42.1%), epiretinal membrane (n = 13, 68.3%), and vitreomacular traction (n = 1, 5.2%). No optical coherence tomography characteristic was predictive of a response to therapy.

CONCLUSION

There is a significant benefit to vision and central macular subfield thickness after acetazolamide treatment in patients with inflammatory macular edema. In patients with refractory inflammatory macular edema, treatment using acetazolamide can provide anatomical and visual benefit without corticosteroid-related adverse effects.

Anti-IL6-Receptor Tocilizumab in Refractory and Noninfectious Uveitic Cystoid Macular Edema: Multicenter Study of 25 Patients

PURPOSE

Cystoid macular edema (CME) is a leading cause of blindness. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) in refractory CME.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Patients with CME secondary to noninfectious uveitis who had inadequate response to corticosteroids and at least 1 conventional immunosuppressive drug, and in most cases to other biological agents, were studied. CME was defined as central retinal thickness greater than 300 μm. The primary outcome measure was macular thickness. Intraocular inflammation, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and corticosteroid-sparing effect were also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients (mean ± standard deviation age 33.6 ± 18.9 years; 17 women) with CME were assessed. Underlying diseases associated with uveitis-related CME are juvenile idiopathic arthritis (n = 9), Behçet disease (n = 7), birdshot retinochoroidopathy (n = 4), idiopathic (n = 4), and sarcoidosis (n = 1). The ocular patterns were panuveitis (n = 9), anterior uveitis (n = 7), posterior uveitis (n = 5), and intermediate uveitis (n = 4). Most patients had CME in both eyes (n = 24). TCZ was used in monotherapy (n = 11) or combined with conventional immunosuppressive drugs. Regardless of the underlying disease, compared to baseline, a statistically significant improvement in macular thickness (415.7 ± 177.2 vs 259.1 ± 499.5 μm; P = .00009) and BCVA (0.39 ± 0.31 vs 0.54 ± 0.33; P = .0002) was obtained, allowing us to reduce the daily dose of prednisone (15.9 ± 13.6 mg/day vs 3.1 ± 2.3 mg/day; P = .002) after 12 months of therapy. Remission was achieved in 14 patients. Only minor side effects were observed after a mean follow-up of 12.7 ± 8.34 months.

CONCLUSION

Macular thickness is reduced following administration of TCZ in refractory uveitis-related CME.

Spectral domain optical coherence tomography as an adjunctive tool for screening Behçet uveitis

Background

This study investigated the association of central macular thickness (CMT) and macular volume (MV) with severity of Behçet uveitis in the absence of macular edema (ME).

Methods

This retrospective, interventional study included a total 131 treatment-naïve Behçet patients with varying degree of uveitis in the absence of ME. The mean CMT and MV were obtained by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD ODT). The patients were classified according to the anatomical classification of Behçet uveitis. The main outcome measure was comparison of mean CMT and MV with the types of Behçet uveitis.

Results

Sixty patients (45.8%) with no uveitis, 41 patients (31.3%) with anterior uveitis, 18 patients (13.7%) with posterior uveitis, and 12 patients (9.2%) with panuveitis. The mean CMT were 261.6±22.2 μm in no uveitis, 268.1±17.8 μm in anterior uveitis, 306.4±32.9 μm in posterior uveitis, and 300.4±44.0 μm in panuveitis (P < 0.001). The mean MV was 8.7±0.3 mm³ in those without uveitis, 8.8±0.3 mm³ in anterior uveitis, 9.9±1.1 mm³ in those with posterior uveitis, and 9.7±0.4 mm³ in panuveitis (P < 0.001). Types of Behçet uveitis was the only significant factor correlated with the mean CMT (B = 18.170, β = 0.408, P < 0.001) and the mean MV (B = 0.328, β = 0.652, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The mean CMT and MV were significantly thicker in the Behçet uveitis with posterior involvement. SD OCT can be used for an adjunctive tool for screening Behçet uveitis, especially for the presence of posterior involvement.

Periocular Triamcinolone vs. Intravitreal Triamcinolone vs. Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant for the Treatment of Uveitic Macular Edema: The PeriOcular vs. INTravitreal corticosteroids for uveitic macular edema (POINT) Trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of 3 regional corticosteroid injections for uveitic macular edema (ME): periocular triamcinolone acetonide (PTA), intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (ITA), and the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI).

DESIGN

Multicenter, randomized clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with uveitic ME.

METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 1 of the 3 therapies. Patients with bilateral ME were assigned the same treatment for both eyes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the proportion of baseline (PropBL) central subfield thickness (CST) at 8 weeks (CST at 8 weeks/CST at baseline) assessed with OCT by masked readers. Secondary outcomes included ≥20% improvement and resolution of ME, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and intraocular pressure (IOP) events over 24 weeks.

RESULTS

All treatment groups demonstrated improved CST during follow-up. At 8 weeks, each group had clinically meaningful reductions in CST relative to baseline (PropBL: 0.77, 0.61, and 0.54, respectively, which translates to reductions of 23%, 39%, and 46% for PTA, ITA, and IDI, respectively). Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (PropBL ITA/PropBL PTA, hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 99.87% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.96) and IDI (PropBL IDI/PropBL PTA, HR, 0.69; 99.87% CI, 0.56-0.86) had larger reductions in CST than PTA (P < 0.0001). Intravitreal dexamethasone implant was noninferior to ITA at 8 weeks (PropBL IDI/PropBL ITA, HR, 0.88; 99.87% CI, 0.71-1.08). Both ITA and IDI treatments also were superior to PTA treatment in improving and resolving uveitic ME. All treatment groups demonstrated BCVA improvement throughout follow-up. Both ITA and IDI groups had improvements in BCVA that was 5 letters greater than in the PTA group at 8 weeks (P < 0.004). The risk of having IOP ≥24 mmHg was higher in the intravitreal treatment groups compared with the periocular group (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 0.91-3.65 and HR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.29-4.91 for ITA and IDI, respectively); however, there was no significant difference between the 2 intravitreal treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and the IDI were superior to PTA for treating uveitic ME with modest increases in the risk of IOP elevation. This risk did not differ significantly between intravitreal treatments.

Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membranes and Macular Holes in Uveitis Patients

PURPOSE

Macular pathology, including macular holes (MHs), epiretinal membranes (ERMs), and macular edema, is a cause of irreversible vision loss in the setting of uveitis. Medical management involves corticosteroids, immunomodulatory medications, and biologics to control inflammation. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) has been suggested as a therapy for uveitis, with reports of reduced inflammation and decreased dependence on medication postoperatively. Currently, PPV is reserved for retinal detachments, vitreous opacities, and ERMs, causing vitreomacular traction. However, little is known about the visual outcomes of PPV with ERM peel for MH, or in ERM without evidence of traction in the context of uveitis.

METHODS

Review of small case series and case reports support both conservative medical treatment and vitrectomy, independently, and in combination, in the management of macular pathology in the setting of uveitis.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are required to study uveitic etiologies separately with respect to visual outcomes after vitreoretinal surgery and medical management.