1
|
Nisselle A, Terrill B, Janinski M, Metcalfe S, Gaff C. Ensuring best practice in genomics education: A scoping review of genomics education needs assessments and evaluations. Am J Hum Genet 2024; 111:1508-1523. [PMID: 38959884 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
A health workforce capable of implementing genomic medicine requires effective genomics education. Genomics education interventions developed for health professions over the last two decades, and their impact, are variably described in the literature. To inform an evaluation framework for genomics education, we undertook an exploratory scoping review of published needs assessments for, and/or evaluations of, genomics education interventions for health professionals from 2000 to 2023. We retrieved and screened 4,659 records across the two searches with 363 being selected for full-text review and consideration by an interdisciplinary working group. 104 articles were selected for inclusion in the review-60 needs assessments, 52 genomics education evaluations, and eight describing both. Included articles spanned all years and described education interventions in over 30 countries. Target audiences included medical specialists, nurses/midwives, and/or allied health professionals. Evaluation questions, outcomes, and measures were extracted, categorized, and tabulated to iteratively compare measures across stages of genomics education evaluation: planning (pre-implementation), development and delivery (implementation), and impact (immediate, intermediate, or long-term outcomes). They are presented here along with descriptions of study designs. We document the wide variability in evaluation approaches and terminology used to define measures and note that few articles considered downstream (long-term) outcomes of genomics education interventions. Alongside the evaluation framework for genomics education, results from this scoping review form part of a toolkit to help educators to undertake rigorous genomics evaluation that is fit for purpose and can contribute to the growing evidence base of the contribution of genomics education in implementation strategies for genomic medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Nisselle
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Genomics in Society, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Bronwyn Terrill
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Genomics in Society, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Monika Janinski
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Genomics in Society, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sylvia Metcalfe
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Genomics in Society, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Genomics in Society, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jaramillo-Aguilar DS, Simbaña-Rivera K. Genetic knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing among final-year medical students at a public university in Ecuador. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1363552. [PMID: 38962733 PMCID: PMC11219587 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1363552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Genetics plays a crucial role in the field of medicine, offering numerous applications. However, health professionals often have insufficient knowledge in this area. Therefore, it is essential to provide appropriate genetics education during university studies. Aim This study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing among final-year medical students at a public university in Ecuador. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted involving final-year medical students from a public university in Ecuador. The third version of the Genetic Literacy and Attitudes Survey was administered between April and May 2022. The study examined sociodemographic characteristics, genetic knowledge, and attitudes towards genetic testing. Results The study included 153 medical students, of which 58.2% identified as female. Most participants fell within the age range of 22 to 25 years old (85.0%). Regarding genetic knowledge, three-quarters of the participants (75.2%) demonstrated intermediate proficiency, while only 9.80% possessed a high level of knowledge. Attitudes towards the clinical and therapeutic applications of genetics, scientific advancements, access to conventional medicine, and other related topics were found to be appropriate. Conclusion The findings suggest that most final-year medical students at a public university in Ecuador have intermediate genetic knowledge and hold appropriate attitudes towards genetic testing. However, higher education institutions should conduct a comprehensive analysis and restructure their curricula to better prepare students for the medical and technological challenges of the 21st century.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katherine Simbaña-Rivera
- Centro de Investigación para la Salud en América Latina (CISeAL), Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (PUCE), Quito, Ecuador
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Capasso A, Nehoray B, Gorman N, Quinn EA, Bucio D, Blazer KR. Genetic counselors' and community clinicians' implementation and perceived barriers to informed consent during pre-test counseling for hereditary cancer risk. J Genet Couns 2024. [PMID: 38480478 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
As demand for genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) continues to increase, so does the sense of urgency to scale up efforts to triage patients, facilitate informed consent, and order genetic testing for cancer risk. The National Society of Genetic Counselors outlines the elements of informed consent that should be addressed in a GCRA session. While this practice resource aims to improve health equity, research on how well the elements of informed consent are implemented in practice is lacking. This retrospective and prospective mixed-methods study assessed how adequately the elements of informed consent are addressed during pre-test GCRA among 307 community clinicians (CC) and 129 cancer genetic counselors (GC), and barriers they face to addressing these elements. Results revealed that more than 90% of both cohorts consistently addressed components of at least 5 of the 10 elements of informed consent during a pre-test consultation. Technical aspects and accuracy of the test and utilization of test results were the most similarly addressed elements. Notably, GCs more often review the purpose of the test and who to test, general information about the gene(s), and economic considerations whereas CCs more often review alternatives to testing. Both cohorts reported psychosocial aspects of the informed consent process as the least adequately addressed element. Time constraints and patient-related concerns were most often cited by both cohorts as barriers to optimal facilitation of informed consent. Additional barriers reported by CCs included provider lack of awareness, experience, or education, and availability of resources and institutional support. Findings from this study may contribute to the development of alternative delivery models that incorporate supplementary educational tools to enhance patient understanding about the utility of genetic testing, while helping to mitigate the barrier of time constraints. Equally important is the use of this information to develop continuing education tools for providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Capasso
- School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Keck Graduate Institute, Claremont, California, USA
- Division of Clinical Cancer Genomics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Bita Nehoray
- Division of Clinical Cancer Genomics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Nicholas Gorman
- School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Keck Graduate Institute, Claremont, California, USA
| | - Emily A Quinn
- School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Keck Graduate Institute, Claremont, California, USA
| | - Daiana Bucio
- Clinical Consultation Services, Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Kathleen R Blazer
- Division of Clinical Cancer Genomics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hansen CA, Reiter AW, Wildin RS. Growth in perceived clinical genetics competency among primary care providers participating in genomic population health screening. J Community Genet 2024; 15:33-37. [PMID: 37792155 PMCID: PMC10857985 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-023-00675-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Limited competency in genetics among primary care providers (PCPs) is a barrier to use of genetic information in healthcare. Formal genetics lessons require time and interest, and knowledge wanes. We hypothesized another path to competency: participation in our PCP-centered adult clinical genomic population health screening program. We asked participating Family Medicine PCPs about their perceptions of growth in their genetics competency. An anonymous, voluntary, cross-sectional survey was developed and distributed to PCPs offering the screening. Results were compiled after 3 weeks. PCPs rated several program resources for value and provided open-ended feedback. Seventy-five percent of respondents agreed that genetics is important to their practice. Eighty-seven percent felt that their knowledge of clinical genetics topics had grown. Eighty-seven percent perceived increased confidence in offering genetic testing and in discussing common genetic results with patients. Respondents gained appreciation for the scope of clinical utility that genetic information offers patients. Each education resource rated at least 3.75 out of 5 for contributing to genetics knowledge. The case-specific Genomic Medicine Action Plan rated highest in educational value, 4.5 out of 5. Most responding PCPs offering genomic population health screening perceived growth in their genetic competency and found hands-on, case-based resources most useful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina A Hansen
- Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Aaron W Reiter
- Department of Family Medicine, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Robert S Wildin
- Departments of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine and Pediatrics, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kapur S, Lichten L, Ali N, Garber KB. Poor recall of genetics curriculum by medical students highlights barriers to use in clinical practice. J Genet Couns 2024; 33:179-188. [PMID: 37735936 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
Many current and upcoming healthcare providers do not feel comfortable ordering or discussing genetic tests and using genetic information in medicine. Nationally, a little over a quarter of medical students indicate that they do not feel prepared to use genetic information in clinical rotations, despite attempts at many schools to remodel the genetics curriculum. This study was conducted at Emory University School of Medicine to identify gaps within the medical curriculum that may contribute to student reports that they feel underprepared to apply genetic knowledge in clinical practice. The analysis included a comprehensive curriculum inventory of genetic content that was then compared to the responses from focus groups of randomly selected second- and fourth-year medical students without a prior genetics degree or background. This joint analysis of precisely what was taught and how it was perceived by students was informative in the development of targeted interventions in our curriculum, and it highlighted the important role of genetic counselors in the education of medical students. Our curriculum has a structure similar to that at many other schools, in which core genetics concepts are concentrated in a brief segment in the first year. We believe our results will be useful for other medical schools to address the perception by medical students that they are underprepared to use genetic information and other basic sciences clinically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunaina Kapur
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lauren Lichten
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Nadia Ali
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kathryn B Garber
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tumienė B, Juozapavičiūtė A, Andriukaitis V. Rare diseases: still on the fringes of universal health coverage in Europe. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2024; 37:100783. [PMID: 38169941 PMCID: PMC10758954 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Despite general advancements in population health indicators and universal health coverage, people living with rare diseases and their families still experience considerable unmet needs, including prolonged diagnostic journeys, limited treatment options, and a huge psychosocial burden due to the lack of coordinated, integrated care. Attainment of universal health coverage for rare diseases is dependent on fundamentally different health determinants and demands for different solutions. This involves consolidating expertise through Centers of Excellence, establishing efficient care pathways, fostering extensive collaboration at European and global levels in research and healthcare, and putting patients at the center of care. Furthermore, development of specific indicators and coding systems is crucial for monitoring progress. Only in this way Europe can strive towards a future where people living with rare diseases receive the same level of equitable, safe, high-quality healthcare as other members of the society, in alignment with the overarching goal of leaving no one behind.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birutė Tumienė
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Vilnius University, M. K. Ciurlionio str. 21, Vilnius LT-03101, Lithuania
- Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Rare Diseases Coordination Center, Santariskiu str. 2, Vilnius LT-08661, Lithuania
| | - Augutė Juozapavičiūtė
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Vilnius University, M. K. Ciurlionio str. 21, Vilnius LT-03101, Lithuania
- Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Rare Diseases Coordination Center, Santariskiu str. 2, Vilnius LT-08661, Lithuania
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, M. K. Ciurlionio str. 21, Vilnius LT-03101, Lithuania
| | - Vytenis Andriukaitis
- European Institute of Health and Sustainable Development, Petro Vileisio str. 18A - 301, Vilnius LT-10306, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
French EL, Kader L, Young EE, Fontes JD. Physician Perception of the Importance of Medical Genetics and Genomics in Medical Education and Clinical Practice. MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE 2023; 28:2143920. [PMID: 36345884 PMCID: PMC9648379 DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2143920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to determine physician perceptions regarding the importance of and comfort with the use of medical genetics and genomics in medical education and practice, as well as physician expectations for medical trainees. METHODS A retrospective survey was sent to physicians employed by a health system associated with a public medical school to assess their perceived training in medical genetics and genomics and their comfort level with ordering genetic testing. METHODS Despite reporting formal genetics training in medical schools, clinicians' comfort with and knowledge in this content area does not meet personal expectations of competency. Though physicians report some discomfort with the use of medical genetics and genomics, the majority also believe that its impact on practice will increase in the next five years. Survey recipients were also asked about their expectations for preparation in the same domains for medical students and incoming residents. The surveyed physicians expect a high level of competency for medical students and incoming residents. METHODS Our study revealed that practicing physicians feel current medical curricula do not produce physicians with the necessary competency in medical genetics and genomics. This is despite physicians' perceived importance of this domain in medical practice. Our findings suggest a need for re-evaluation of medical genetics and genomics education at all levels of training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Leena Kader
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Erin E. Young
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Joseph D. Fontes
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ahimaz P, Ross M, Foltz J, Sebastin M, Naik K, Kramer T, Bogyo K, Primiano M. Future Frontiers: Exploration of practices, challenges, and educational needs of genetic counselors in emerging subspecialties. J Genet Couns 2023; 32:1238-1248. [PMID: 37975258 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
The augmented use of genomic testing across different medical subspecialties has led to increased involvement of genetic counselors (GCs) in specialized areas of medicine. However, the lack of educational infrastructure required for changing scholastic needs of GCs entering new subspecialties lends to the burden of self-directed learning and inconsistent knowledge. We conducted a cross-sectional study surveying GCs with experience in the emerging genetic subspecialties of Immunology, Dermatology, Endocrinology, and Pulmonology (abbreviated as "IDEP") on current practices, clinical challenges, and educational strategies undertaken while working in these settings. We compared knowledge and confidence in skills related to IDEP patient care between GCs who do (experienced cohort) and do not (control cohort) practice in these settings to assess their comfort with working in subspecialties. Participants were recruited from the National Society of Genetic Counselors membership. A total of 304 GCs (178 experienced and 126 control) completed the survey. Most GCs in the experienced cohort saw IDEP patients by themselves (n = 104; 58.4%) or with a geneticist (n = 97; 54.4%) and almost all (n = 176; 99%) cited GeneReviews as a primary informational source for IDEP genetics but half (n = 91; 51.1%) agreed that a dedicated online course would be the best way to learn about a specific subspecialty. The experienced cohort scored higher on confidence in all skills (p < 0.001, z = 7.32) and knowledge (p < 0.001, z = 5.68) related to IDEP genetics than the control cohort. Previous exposure to IDEP through graduate school coursework and rotations positively correlated with better self-confidence in skills (p = 0.02, z = -2.19; p < 0.001, z = -5.25) and genetic knowledge (p = 0.03, z = -2.09; p < 0.001, z = -2.81) related to IDEP patient care. Years of experience working as a GC did not correlate with better confidence in skills (p = 0.53) or better IDEP genetic knowledge (p = 0.15). Our findings show that provision of opportunities for increased exposure to subspecialties could help maximize GCs' ability to work in emerging niche fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyanka Ahimaz
- Division of Molecular Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Meredith Ross
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jennah Foltz
- Genetic Counseling Graduate Program, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Monisha Sebastin
- Division of Genetics Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ketki Naik
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tamar Kramer
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kelsie Bogyo
- Interdepartmental Genetic Counseling Program, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michelle Primiano
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Arshad M, Trepanier A, Hashmi SS, Naeem R, Mehmood S, Ashfaq M. Medical students' self-perceived knowledge and clinical comfort with genetics in Pakistan. J Genet Couns 2023. [PMID: 37960989 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
Pakistan has a high rate of genetic disorders and neonatal mortality concurrent with noted lack of genetic counselors and geneticists. To meet the needs of the patient population, the responsibility of providing clinical genetic services falls on general and specialty physicians. However, their education regarding these essential services is not standardized in medical school curricula nor has it ever been evaluated. The purpose of this work is to describe the self-perceived knowledge, clinical comfort, and perspectives of Pakistani medical students toward their medical genetics' education. A web-based survey was distributed electronically to medical schools around the country. The survey comprised of four sections: (1) participant demographics, (2) self-perceived medical genetics knowledge, (3) level of comfort in applying genetic knowledge and skills, and (4) attitudes toward medical genetics education. Descriptive statistics and a one-way analysis of variance were used for data analysis. Medical students in years 3, 4, and 5 (n = 473) from 25 medical schools participated in this research representing medical education in four Pakistani provinces. Most medical students reported "minimal" to "basic" knowledge of genetic testing methodology (64.7%), cancer genetics (64.9%), prenatal genetic testing (63.02%), and treatment strategies for genetic disease (72.9%). A plurality of students (37%) reported they were uncomfortable with interpreting and communicating genetic test results to patients. Medical students also expressed dissatisfaction with their medical genetics (40%) and genetic counselors training (42%). The self-perceived knowledge and clinical comfort with genetics among Pakistani medical students was limited, especially regarding genetic testing. A significant portion (74.5%) expressed desire for additional genetics education during medical school to aid in their role as future physicians. It is important for physicians-in-training to have a solid understanding of genetic concepts, technologies, and genetic counseling to best support their patients. As endorsed by the participating medical students, this study supports inclusion of more robust genetics' education into Pakistan's medical school curricula.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maheen Arshad
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Detroit, Michigan, USA
- Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Angela Trepanier
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - S Shahrukh Hashmi
- Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Rizwan Naeem
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Saqib Mehmood
- University of Health Sciences, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Myla Ashfaq
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Genetics, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Patterson WG, Tribble LM, Hopkins CS, Fasolino TK, Ward LD. The State of Genetics and Genomics Education in US Physician Assistant Programs. J Physician Assist Educ 2023; 34:195-202. [PMID: 37467203 DOI: 10.1097/jpa.0000000000000519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the current landscape of genetics-genomics education in physician assistant (PA) student training. METHODS A 25-question electronic survey was emailed to program directors of the 273 accredited PA programs. Questions represented PA program demographics and 4 domains: curricular characteristics and perceived adequacy; content; curricular approaches and instructional methods; and intent, barriers, and perceived needs for an optimal curriculum. RESULTS A total of 115 PA program representatives (42%) returned the survey. More than two-thirds of responding programs do not require a prerequisite genetics course for matriculation. Most programs (48%) include 1 to 10 contact hours of genetics-genomics content and use various content delivery methods and approaches. Most programs (67%) use PA program faculty to teach genetics-genomics as part of one course or many courses throughout the curriculum (85%) using didactic lectures (97%). The most significant barrier to developing an optimal curriculum is an already overloaded curriculum (71%). Physician assistant educators welcome supportive resources, such as genetic case studies (96%). CONCLUSIONS The study findings elucidate the current state of genetics-genomics education in PA programs. Every responding program reports that genetics-genomics is integrated into their curriculum; however, no standardization exists between programs. Although medical genetics-genomics has changed and advanced rapidly since a similar survey was conducted 14 years ago, the number of contact hours is unchanged, and genetics-genomics content is less dispersed throughout PA curricula. To create genetic-competent and genomic-competent PAs, education must evolve to stay current with ongoing advancements in genomic science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley G Patterson
- Wesley G. Patterson, PhD, MSPA, PA-C, CAQ-Peds, is a genetics physician assistant, Greenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, South Carolina
- Leta M. Tribble, PhD, is a director, Division of Education, Greenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, South Carolina
- Casey S. Hopkins, PhD, RN, WHNP-BC, is an assistant professor, Clemson University School of Nursing, Clemson, South Carolina
- Tracy K. Fasolino, PhD, FNP-BC, ACHPN, is an associate professor, Clemson University School of Nursing, Clemson, South Carolina
- Linda D. Ward, PhD, CNE, FNP-C, is an associate professor, Clemson University School of Nursing, Clemson, South Carolina
| | - Leta M Tribble
- Wesley G. Patterson, PhD, MSPA, PA-C, CAQ-Peds, is a genetics physician assistant, Greenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, South Carolina
- Leta M. Tribble, PhD, is a director, Division of Education, Greenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, South Carolina
- Casey S. Hopkins, PhD, RN, WHNP-BC, is an assistant professor, Clemson University School of Nursing, Clemson, South Carolina
- Tracy K. Fasolino, PhD, FNP-BC, ACHPN, is an associate professor, Clemson University School of Nursing, Clemson, South Carolina
- Linda D. Ward, PhD, CNE, FNP-C, is an associate professor, Clemson University School of Nursing, Clemson, South Carolina
| | - Casey S Hopkins
- Wesley G. Patterson, PhD, MSPA, PA-C, CAQ-Peds, is a genetics physician assistant, Greenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, South Carolina
- Leta M. Tribble, PhD, is a director, Division of Education, Greenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, South Carolina
- Casey S. Hopkins, PhD, RN, WHNP-BC, is an assistant professor, Clemson University School of Nursing, Clemson, South Carolina
- Tracy K. Fasolino, PhD, FNP-BC, ACHPN, is an associate professor, Clemson University School of Nursing, Clemson, South Carolina
- Linda D. Ward, PhD, CNE, FNP-C, is an associate professor, Clemson University School of Nursing, Clemson, South Carolina
| | - Tracy K Fasolino
- Wesley G. Patterson, PhD, MSPA, PA-C, CAQ-Peds, is a genetics physician assistant, Greenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, South Carolina
- Leta M. Tribble, PhD, is a director, Division of Education, Greenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, South Carolina
- Casey S. Hopkins, PhD, RN, WHNP-BC, is an assistant professor, Clemson University School of Nursing, Clemson, South Carolina
- Tracy K. Fasolino, PhD, FNP-BC, ACHPN, is an associate professor, Clemson University School of Nursing, Clemson, South Carolina
- Linda D. Ward, PhD, CNE, FNP-C, is an associate professor, Clemson University School of Nursing, Clemson, South Carolina
| | - Linda D Ward
- Wesley G. Patterson, PhD, MSPA, PA-C, CAQ-Peds, is a genetics physician assistant, Greenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, South Carolina
- Leta M. Tribble, PhD, is a director, Division of Education, Greenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, South Carolina
- Casey S. Hopkins, PhD, RN, WHNP-BC, is an assistant professor, Clemson University School of Nursing, Clemson, South Carolina
- Tracy K. Fasolino, PhD, FNP-BC, ACHPN, is an associate professor, Clemson University School of Nursing, Clemson, South Carolina
- Linda D. Ward, PhD, CNE, FNP-C, is an associate professor, Clemson University School of Nursing, Clemson, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hristova-Atanasova E, Iskrov G, Atanasov I, Genc A, Stefanov R. What is the awareness of rare diseases among medical students? A survey in Bulgaria. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2023; 18:213. [PMID: 37491304 PMCID: PMC10369688 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-023-02820-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rare diseases (RDs) are life-threatening or chronically debilitating and offer a high level of complexity. The aim of this study is to assess medical students' knowledge and awareness of RDs as well as their perceptions of potential measures to boost training in RDs. The cross-sectional survey was conducted at the Medical University of Plovdiv, Bulgaria, in 2019. The questionnaire contained 12 questions, divided into three main categories: (1) sociodemographic profile; (2) knowledge and awareness of RDs; and (3) attitudes about potential measures to improve training in RDs. RESULTS A total of 1189 medical students completed the survey with an overall response rate of 56.4%. Only 13% of participants knew the correct definition of RDs, and a low overall level of awareness was found with regard to orphan drugs (20.3%) and genetic counselling and testing (0.5%). Respondents believed that society as a whole was largely unaware of RDs as a major public health issue. Students suggested elective courses, and invited lectures by RDs experts, and participation in research projects as the most preferred measures to improve undergraduate training. CONCLUSIONS It is crucial to address the gaps in medical students' knowledge and awareness of RDs. University curricula should consider incorporating different RDs training modalities. It is essential to encourage various stakeholders to play a more proactive role and to collaborate in these activities. Involvement of patient organisations and advocacy groups might enhance students' knowledge of the challenges faced by people with RDs. Not least, the media should be partners in this important endeavour as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Hristova-Atanasova
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Georgi Iskrov
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Institute for Rare Diseases, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Ivan Atanasov
- Department of Pediatrics, Pulmed University Hospital, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Atilla Genc
- Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Rumen Stefanov
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Institute for Rare Diseases, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kudron EL, Deininger KM, Aquilante CL. Are Graduate Medical Trainees Prepared for the Personalized Genomic Medicine Revolution? Trainee Perspectives at One Institution. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1025. [PMID: 37511638 PMCID: PMC10381337 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13071025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Although the use of genomics to inform clinical care is increasing, clinicians feel underprepared to integrate personalized medicine (PM) into care decisions. The educational needs of physician residents and fellows, also known as graduate medical trainees (GMTs), have been overlooked. We administered an anonymous, web-based survey to all GMTs participating in training programs affiliated with our institution to evaluate their knowledge, skills, and attitudes toward PM. Of the 1190 GMTs contacted, 319 (26.8%) returned surveys. Most (88.4%) respondents reported receiving PM education in the past. Although the respondents agreed that knowledge of disease genetics (80.9%) or pharmacogenetics (87.1%) would likely lead to improved clinical outcomes, only 33.2% of the respondents felt sufficiently informed about PM. The respondents who had received PM education in residency and/or fellowship had significantly higher self-reported knowledge, ability, awareness, and adoption of PM than those who had not received this education (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, and p < 0.01, respectively). Targeted training is needed to improve GMTs' confidence in interpreting and explaining genetic test results. The ideal timing for this education appears to be in residency and/or fellowship rather than in medical school.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth L Kudron
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Kimberly M Deininger
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Christina L Aquilante
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ouellet J, Lapointe J, Raîche C, Guerin A, Helal S, Fitzpatrick J, Dorval M, Nabi H. Scope of coverage of medical genetics and genomics in pre-clerkship programs of Canadian faculties of medicine: A curriculum analysis. Am J Med Genet A 2023; 191:13-21. [PMID: 36164991 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
We appraised the scope of medical genetics and genomics concepts covered in the pre-clerkship programs of Canadian faculties of medicine through an analysis of course objectives. All course objectives linked to medical genetics and genomics in pre-clerkship programs of Canadian faculties of medicine were compiled. From this, the fraction of objectives dedicated to medical genetics and genomics was calculated. Course objectives were also categorized according to a curriculum and a competency classification. Of the 17 Canadian faculties of medicine, the complete set of course syllabi (5 faculties) or the listing of learning objectives (4 faculties) were obtained and reviewed. The fraction of learning objectives dedicated to medical genetics and genomics varied between 0.65% and 5.05%. From the objectives classification, "foundational knowledge" was most frequently covered (64% of the compiled objectives), while topics such as: "ethics and professionalism," "communicate genetics information," and "obtain specialist help" were covered by less than 5%. Coverage of medical genetics and genomics in pre-clerkship programs of Canadian faculties of medicine appears to be low. Genetics and genomics are playing a rapidly expanding role in healthcare and clinical practice and educational programs should consider this new reality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jade Ouellet
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.,Oncology Division, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Julie Lapointe
- Oncology Division, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Camille Raîche
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec city, Québec, Canada
| | - Andrea Guerin
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shaimaa Helal
- School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Michel Dorval
- Oncology Division, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, Québec, Canada.,Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Québec city, Québec, Canada.,CISSS Chaudière-Appalaches Research Center, Lévis, Québec, Canada
| | - Hermann Nabi
- Oncology Division, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, Québec, Canada.,Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec city, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vanasse AM, Weiler T, Roth EA, Upadhya S, Toriello HV, VanLeuven AJ, Norris JR, Carey JC, Sobering AK. Teaching perspectives on the communication of difficult news of genetic conditions to medical students. Am J Med Genet A 2023; 191:299-305. [PMID: 36286987 PMCID: PMC10092636 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Informing parents that their child has a diagnosis of Down syndrome (DS) is a common example of the delivery of unexpected or difficult news. Expectations and life planning will change, and if detected prenatally, discussions might include the option of pregnancy termination. Medical school curricula currently include training in breaking unexpected news; however, it is difficult to teach and assess. We use the perspectives of clinicians, educators, and a medical student who is the parent of a child with DS to frame a discussion on teaching, practicing, and assessing communication of difficult news in human genetics during medical school.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley M Vanasse
- Department of Biochemistry, St. George's University, St. George's, Grenada.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma School of Community Medicine, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Tracey Weiler
- Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Roth
- AU/UGA Medical Partnership Campus of the Medical College of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
| | - Sharmila Upadhya
- Department of Biochemistry, St. George's University, St. George's, Grenada
| | - Helga V Toriello
- Department of Pediatrics and Human Development, Michigan State University - College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Ariel J VanLeuven
- AU/UGA Medical Partnership Campus of the Medical College of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.,Department of Cellular Biology and Anatomy, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - John R Norris
- AU/UGA Medical Partnership Campus of the Medical College of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
| | - John C Carey
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Andrew K Sobering
- Department of Biochemistry, St. George's University, St. George's, Grenada.,AU/UGA Medical Partnership Campus of the Medical College of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.,Windward Islands Research and Education Foundation, True Blue, St. George's, Grenada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Morgenthau A, Margus C, Mackley MP, Miller AP. Rare Disease Education Outside of the Classroom and Clinic: Evaluation of the RARE Compassion Program for Undergraduate Medical Students. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:genes13101707. [PMID: 36292592 PMCID: PMC9601568 DOI: 10.3390/genes13101707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Launched in 2014, the RARE Compassion Program is the first international educational program to pair medical students with rare disease patients in order to enhance exposure to and comfort with rare diseases. As part of ongoing quality improvement, this study retrospectively reviewed four years of participant registration data to conduct a program evaluation of the RARE Compassion Program between 2014–2018. During the study period, there were 334 student participants, representing 67.3% of Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) member medical schools, and 5389 rare disease volunteers. Despite not requiring in-person interaction, 90.64% of student–volunteer interactions were in-person, while only 5.89% and 3.46% were by video messaging or email correspondence, respectively (p = 0.0002). In a limited post participation survey, 91.7% of students, who matched to 19 out of 27 residency specialities, indicated they would recommend the program to their peers. These findings suggest that the RARE Compassion Program, designed to increase medical student engagement with rare disease patients, has broad appeal. It serves as a novel case study of how extracurricular initiatives supported by non-profit organizations can augment the medical training experience and improve understanding of important and often neglected perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ari Morgenthau
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3H2, Canada
- Correspondence:
| | - Colton Margus
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Bronxcare Health System, The Bronx, NY 10457, USA
| | - Michael P. Mackley
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Ashley P. Miller
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Weiler T, Landa-Galindez A. Online interactive genetics education during internal medicine clinical clerkship. Genet Med 2022; 24:1362-1371. [PMID: 35339389 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Advances in genetics have revolutionized disease surveillance and management. Understanding and integrating genetic principles clinically is becoming increasingly important for physician trainees. We developed an online, interactive, self-learning module/assessment to strengthen student proficiency in genetics. METHODS Medical student knowledge of genetics during Internal Medicine Clerkship was assessed by an online, asynchronous quiz using simulated vignettes that included questions on (1) genetic red flags, (2) differential diagnoses, (3) pedigree drawing, (4) interpretation of inheritance patterns, (5) selection of diagnostic testing modalities, and (6) genetic counseling. Student self-assessment of genetics competencies was elicited with survey questions. RESULTS A total of 592 medical students from classes of 2016 to 2020 successfully completed the "Genetics in Internal Medicine" module/assessment. In total, 91% of students correctly recognized genetic red flags in patient histories, 84% could accurately draw pedigrees, and 93% could accurately interpret inheritance patterns. In total, 92% of students felt that genetic proficiency would improve patient rapport and 91% felt that they could apply what they had learned clinically. Student narrative comments about the activity were positive. CONCLUSION This online module was easily integrated into the IM Clerkship. Medical students were able to solidify scientific principles and interpret historical details, predict genetic patterns, and provide counseling. They had successful performances, and the module/assessment was well-received.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracey Weiler
- Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL.
| | - Amalia Landa-Galindez
- Department of Translational Medicine, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Niehaus AD, Rassbach CE, Stevenson DA. A survey of program directors for combined pediatrics and medical genetics and genomics residency programs: Perspectives when evaluating applicants. Am J Med Genet A 2022; 188:2315-2324. [PMID: 35633299 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
While combined pediatrics and medical genetics and genomics residency programs are growing in number and applicants, there are still workforce shortages within the medical genetics field. Medical students would benefit from additional information on the training pathways and insight into the application process itself. Program Directors of combined pediatrics and medical genetics and genomics residency programs were surveyed to characterize factors that influence interview selection and rank list decisions, application logistics, recruitment, and training pathways. When evaluating applicants, representatives from both pediatrics and medical genetics are involved in the screening process. Additionally, both groups value prior research experience, but do not have a clear preference for a particular subcategory or domain of research. Most program directors think that all currently-available training pathways can provide optimal training. Further action is needed to provide medical students with the knowledge to make more informed decisions about their career and medical school advisors with objective data to counsel students. There was support among program directors to initiate consideration of creating a pathway for medical students to match directly into a medical genetics and genomics residency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie D Niehaus
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Caroline E Rassbach
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - David A Stevenson
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
East KM, Cochran ME, Kelley WV, Greve V, Finnila CR, Coleman T, Jennings M, Alexander L, Rahn EJ, Danila MI, Barsh G, Korf B, Cooper G. Education and Training of Non-Genetics Providers on the Return of Genome Sequencing Results in a NICU Setting. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12030405. [PMID: 35330405 PMCID: PMC8949881 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12030405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
To meet current and expected future demand for genome sequencing in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), adjustments to traditional service delivery models are necessary. Effective programs for the training of non-genetics providers (NGPs) may address the known barriers to providing genetic services including limited genetics knowledge and lack of confidence. The SouthSeq project aims to use genome sequencing to make genomic diagnoses in the neonatal period and evaluate a scalable approach to delivering genome sequencing results to populations with limited access to genetics professionals. Thirty-three SouthSeq NGPs participated in a live, interactive training intervention and completed surveys before and after participation. Here, we describe the protocol for the provider training intervention utilized in the SouthSeq study and the associated impact on NGP knowledge and confidence in reviewing, interpreting, and using genome sequencing results. Participation in the live training intervention led to an increased level of confidence in critical skills needed for real-world implementation of genome sequencing. Providers reported a significant increase in confidence level in their ability to review, understand, and use genome sequencing result reports to guide patient care. Reported barriers to implementation of genome sequencing in a NICU setting included test cost, lack of insurance coverage, and turn around time. As implementation of genome sequencing in this setting progresses, effective education of NGPs is critical to provide access to high-quality and timely genomic medicine care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly M. East
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA; (M.E.C.); (W.V.K.); (V.G.); (C.R.F.); (T.C.); (M.J.); (L.A.); (G.B.); (G.C.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-256-327-0461
| | - Meagan E. Cochran
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA; (M.E.C.); (W.V.K.); (V.G.); (C.R.F.); (T.C.); (M.J.); (L.A.); (G.B.); (G.C.)
| | - Whitley V. Kelley
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA; (M.E.C.); (W.V.K.); (V.G.); (C.R.F.); (T.C.); (M.J.); (L.A.); (G.B.); (G.C.)
| | - Veronica Greve
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA; (M.E.C.); (W.V.K.); (V.G.); (C.R.F.); (T.C.); (M.J.); (L.A.); (G.B.); (G.C.)
| | - Candice R. Finnila
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA; (M.E.C.); (W.V.K.); (V.G.); (C.R.F.); (T.C.); (M.J.); (L.A.); (G.B.); (G.C.)
| | - Tanner Coleman
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA; (M.E.C.); (W.V.K.); (V.G.); (C.R.F.); (T.C.); (M.J.); (L.A.); (G.B.); (G.C.)
| | - Mikayla Jennings
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA; (M.E.C.); (W.V.K.); (V.G.); (C.R.F.); (T.C.); (M.J.); (L.A.); (G.B.); (G.C.)
| | - Latonya Alexander
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA; (M.E.C.); (W.V.K.); (V.G.); (C.R.F.); (T.C.); (M.J.); (L.A.); (G.B.); (G.C.)
| | - Elizabeth J. Rahn
- Division of Clinical Immunology/Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; (E.J.R.); (M.I.D.)
| | - Maria I. Danila
- Division of Clinical Immunology/Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; (E.J.R.); (M.I.D.)
| | - Greg Barsh
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA; (M.E.C.); (W.V.K.); (V.G.); (C.R.F.); (T.C.); (M.J.); (L.A.); (G.B.); (G.C.)
| | - Bruce Korf
- Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA;
| | - Greg Cooper
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA; (M.E.C.); (W.V.K.); (V.G.); (C.R.F.); (T.C.); (M.J.); (L.A.); (G.B.); (G.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Duong D, Waikel RL, Hu P, Tekendo-Ngongang C, Solomon BD. Neural network classifiers for images of genetic conditions with cutaneous manifestations. HGG ADVANCES 2022; 3:100053. [PMID: 35047844 PMCID: PMC8756521 DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2021.100053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Neural networks have shown strong potential in research and in healthcare. Mainly due to the need for large datasets, these applications have focused on common medical conditions, where more data are typically available. Leveraging publicly available data, we trained a neural network classifier on images of rare genetic conditions with skin findings. We used approximately 100 images per condition to classify 6 different genetic conditions. We analyzed both preprocessed images that were cropped to show only the skin lesions as well as more complex images showing features such as the entire body segment, the person, and/or the background. The classifier construction process included attribution methods to visualize which pixels were most important for computer-based classification. Our classifier was significantly more accurate than pediatricians or medical geneticists for both types of images and suggests steps for further research involving clinical scenarios and other applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dat Duong
- Medical Genomics Unit, Medical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Rebekah L. Waikel
- Medical Genomics Unit, Medical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Ping Hu
- Medical Genomics Unit, Medical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Cedrik Tekendo-Ngongang
- Medical Genomics Unit, Medical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Benjamin D. Solomon
- Medical Genomics Unit, Medical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
- Corresponding author
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Doll B, De Castro MJ, Fries MH, Pock AR, Seibert D, Yang W. Precision Medicine-A Demand Signal for Genomics Education. Mil Med 2021; 187:40-46. [PMID: 34967402 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usab406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pressed by the accumulating knowledge in genomics and the proven success of the translation of cancer genomics to clinical practice in oncology, the Obama administration unveiled a $215 million commitment for the Precision Medicine Initiative (PMI) in 2016, a pioneering research effort to improve health and treat disease using a new model of patient-powered research. The objectives of the initiative include more effective treatments for cancer and other diseases, creation of a voluntary national research cohort, adherence to privacy protections for maintaining data sharing and use, modernization of the regulatory framework, and forging public-private partnerships to facilitate these objectives. Specifically, the DoD Military Health System joined other agencies to execute a comprehensive effort for PMI. Of the many challenges to consider that may contribute to the implementation of genomics-lack of familiarity and understanding, poor access to genomic medicine expertise, needs for extensive informatics and infrastructure to integrate genomic results, privacy and security, and policy development to address the unique requirements of military medical practice-we will focus on the need to establish education in genomics appropriate to the provider's responsibilities. Our hypothesis is that there is a growing urgency for the development of educational experiences, formal and informal, to enable clinicians to acquire competency in genomics commensurate with their level of practice. Several educational approaches, both in practice and in development, are presented to inform decision-makers and empower military providers to pursue courses of action that respond to this need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce Doll
- Office of the Vice President for Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | | | - Melissa H Fries
- Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20010, USA
| | - Arnyce R Pock
- E. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Diane Seibert
- Daniel K Inouye Graduate School of Nursing, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Wendy Yang
- E. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Alotaibi AA, Cordero MAW. Assessing Medical Students' Knowledge of Genetics: Basis for Improving Genetics Curriculum for Future Clinical Practice. ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE 2021; 12:1521-1530. [PMID: 35002351 PMCID: PMC8722570 DOI: 10.2147/amep.s337756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The knowledge of genetics among medical students was assessed to identify and analyze gaps that serve as bases for the revision of the current genetics curriculum of the (Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery) MBBS Program of the College of Medicine at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (PNU). METHODS A 65-item multiple-choice (MCQs) test in Genetics was administered to 71 second and fourth-year medical students to assess their knowledge in Genetics. MCQs were validated and tested for their reliability. Self-assessment of students' genetics knowledge was also determined by asking them whether their knowledge in genetics is sufficient or not sufficient for their future clinical practice. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20. RESULTS Forty-one second-year and thirty fourth-year medical students took the Genetic test. Exam results showed insufficient knowledge of Genetics, with 43.85% among the students answering the exam correctly. In self-assessment, the majority (83.3% to 87.8%) of the respondents considered their knowledge of genetics insufficient for future clinical practice. A higher knowledge level of basic genetics compared with clinically related genetics concepts was observed. Generally, second-year students significantly scored higher in molecular and cytogenetics (P=0.012), principles of genetic transmission (P=0.022), and inheritance of genetic diseases (P=0.024), compared with the fourth-year medical students who only scored higher in items related to cancer genetics (P=0.022). CONCLUSION Medical students' genetics knowledge is insufficient, especially on clinically oriented concepts like genetic testing and genetic counseling and should be strengthened for future clinical practice. The fourth-year medical students do not retain the knowledge of genetics; thus, integrating medical genetics in clinical years is imperative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amal A Alotaibi
- Basic Science Department, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, 11671, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Mary Anne W Cordero
- Basic Science Department, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, 11671, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
An innovative medical school curriculum to enhance exposure to genetics and genomics: Updates and outcomes. Genet Med 2021; 24:722-728. [PMID: 34906481 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In 2011, we introduced an innovative parallel curriculum at Baylor College of Medicine, formerly called the Genetics Track Curriculum and now called the Genetics and Genomics Pathway, aimed at providing an opportunity for an enriched educational experience throughout medical school. In this report, we describe our 10-year experience with the program and highlight growth in enrollment as well as academic achievements of graduating students. METHODS We reviewed the data of students enrolled in this pathway, including retention, satisfaction, student-driven curriculum changes, scholarly outcomes, and career outcomes. RESULTS From September 2011 to June 2021, 121 students were enrolled in the Genetics and Genomics Pathway program. In total, 64 students (64/121 = 53%) left the program before graduating (the majority, after their first year). Of the 57 remaining students, 29 graduated (29/57, approximately 51%), and 4 of the 29 students (4/29 = 14%) matched into a genetics training program. CONCLUSION This novel program serves as a mechanism for garnering increased interest and competence in medical genetics. The longitudinal nature of the program fosters enthusiasm for genetics and provides ample opportunity to develop valuable research skills. Given the ongoing shortage of providers in this field, such programs are vital to increase the size of the workforce and broaden the knowledge of providers in diverse fields.
Collapse
|
23
|
Swandayani YM, Cayami FK, Winarni TI, Utari A. Familiarity and genetic literacy among medical students in Indonesia. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2021; 21:524. [PMID: 34625081 PMCID: PMC8501723 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02946-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a lack of genetic knowledge among health care professionals especially in some developing countries such as Indonesia. Based on our experience, genetic disorders receive less attention in medical education and professionals. This study aims to determine the familiarity and literacy of genetics among medical students in Indonesia. METHODS A total of 1003 Indonesian medical (pre-clinical and clinical) students completed the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Genetics (REAL-G) questionnaire with a total score of seven for familiarity and eight for genetic literacy. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the familiarity and genetic literacy scores between pre-clinical and clinical students. RESULTS The average scores of familiarity and genetic literacy were 5.63 ± 0.96 and 6.37 ± 0.83, respectively. Genetic familiarity was higher (p = 0.043) among clinical students than pre-clinical students, while there was no significant difference in genetic literacy (p = 0.362) between pre-clinical and clinical students. Genetic familiarity does not impact the level of genetic literacy. However, medical students' genetic literacy is influenced by demographic characteristics, such as age, sex, university type, genetic learning experience, university accreditation, and university location. CONCLUSIONS In general, Indonesian medical students have relatively good familiarity and literacy in genetics although further study is necessary to accurately measure the genetic familiarity and literacy in medical students and general public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ferdy Kurniawan Cayami
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
- Center for Biomedical Research (CEBIOR), Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof H. Soedarto, SH, 50275, Semarang, Indonesia
| | - Tri Indah Winarni
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
- Center for Biomedical Research (CEBIOR), Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof H. Soedarto, SH, 50275, Semarang, Indonesia
| | - Agustini Utari
- Center for Biomedical Research (CEBIOR), Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof H. Soedarto, SH, 50275, Semarang, Indonesia.
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zimani AN, Peterlin B, Kovanda A. Increasing Genomic Literacy Through National Genomic Projects. Front Genet 2021; 12:693253. [PMID: 34456970 PMCID: PMC8387713 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.693253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Genomics is an advancing field of medicine, science, ethics, and legislation. Keeping up to date with this challenging discipline requires continuous education and exchange of knowledge between many target groups. Specific challenges in genomic education include tailoring complex topics to diverse audiences ranging from the general public and patients to highly educated professionals. National genomic projects face many of the same challenges and thus offer many opportunities to highlight common educational strategies for improving genomic literacy. We have reviewed 41 current national genomic projects and have identified 16 projects specifically describing their approach to genomic education. The following target groups were included in the educational efforts: the general public (nine projects), patients (six projects), and genomic professionals (16 projects), reflecting the general overall aims of the projects such as determining normal and pathological genomic variation, improving infrastructure, and facilitating personalized medicine. The national genomic projects aim to increase genomic literacy through supplementing existing national education in genomics as well as independent measures specifically tailored to each target group, such as training events, research collaboration, and online resources for healthcare professionals, patients, and patient organizations. This review provides the current state of educational activities within national genomic projects for different target groups and identifies good practices that could contribute to patient empowerment, public engagement, proficient healthcare professionals, and lend support to personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Nyasha Zimani
- Clinical Institute of Genomic Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Borut Peterlin
- Clinical Institute of Genomic Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Anja Kovanda
- Clinical Institute of Genomic Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Dewell S, Ginn C, Benzies K, Seneviratne C. Nursing student and faculty attitudes about a potential genomics-informed undergraduate curriculum. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh 2021; 18:ijnes-2020-0109. [PMID: 34380187 DOI: 10.1515/ijnes-2020-0109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore attitudes about adding genomic content to an undergraduate nursing curriculum. Genomic knowledge is essential to nursing education, but challenges exist for curriculum innovation. Few countries have guiding documents from national nursing organizations on genomic competencies for practice or education. Information on attitudes about genomics may provide guidance for curriculum development. METHODS Nineteen undergraduate nursing students and two faculty from a school of nursing with two sites in western Canada participated. Five focus groups and four interviews were conducted using a semi-structured focus group guide. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Coding was inductive. RESULTS Characteristics of participants, eight key themes, and four future focal areas were identified to guide future research and curriculum development. CONCLUSIONS Global development of genomics-informed curricula will require a focus on increasing knowledge, defining scope and role, increasing visibility of role models, and preparing to implement precision health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Dewell
- School of Nursing, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada
| | - Carla Ginn
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Karen Benzies
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
McGrath SP, Peabody AE, Walton D, Walton N. Legal Challenges in Precision Medicine: What Duties Arising From Genetic and Genomic Testing Does a Physician Owe to Patients? Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:663014. [PMID: 34381794 PMCID: PMC8349980 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.663014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Precision medicine is increasingly incorporated into clinical practice via three primary data conduits: environmental, lifestyle, and genetic data. In this manuscript we take a closer look at the genetic tier of precision medicine. The volume and variety of data provides a more robust picture of health for individual patients and patient populations. However, this increased data may also have an adverse effect by muddling our understanding without the proper pedagogical tools. Patient genomic data can be challenging to work with. Physicians may encounter genetic results which are not fully understood. Genetic tests may also lead to the quandary of linking patients with diseases or disorders where there are no known treatments. Thus, physicians face a unique challenge of establishing the proper scope of their duty to patients when dealing with genomic data. Some of those scope of practice boundaries have been established as a result of litigation, while others remain an open question. In this paper, we map out some of the legal challenges facing the genomic component of precision medicine, both established and some questions requiring additional guidance. If physicians begin to perceive genomic data as falling short in overall benefit to their patients, it may detrimentally impact precision medicine as a whole. Helping to develop guidance for physicians working with patient genomic data can help avoid this fate of faltering confidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott P McGrath
- CITRIS and the Banatao Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
| | - Arthur E Peabody
- Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, Professional Corporation, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Derek Walton
- Walton Legal Professional Limited Liability Company, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Nephi Walton
- Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Donohue KE, Gooch C, Katz A, Wakelee J, Slavotinek A, Korf BR. Pitfalls and challenges in genetic test interpretation: An exploration of genetic professionals experience with interpretation of results. Clin Genet 2021; 99:638-649. [PMID: 33818754 DOI: 10.1111/cge.13917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The interpretation of genetic testing results is subject to error. This observational study illustrates examples of pitfalls and challenges in interpretation of genetic testing results as reported by genetics professionals. We surveyed genetics professionals to describe interpretation challenges, the types of variants that were involved, and the reported clinical impact of misconception of a test result. Case studies were then collected from a select group to further explore potential causes of misunderstanding. A total of 83% of survey respondents were aware of at least one instance of genetic test misinterpretation. Both professionals with and without formal training in genetics were challenged by test reports, and variants of unknown significance were most frequently involved. Case submissions revealed that interpretation pitfalls extend beyond variant classification analyses. Inferred challenges in case submissions include lack of genetic counseling, unclear wording of reports, and suboptimal communication among providers. Respondents and case submitters noted that incorrect interpretation can trigger unnecessary follow-up tests and improperly alter clinical management. Further research is needed to validate and quantify large-scale data regarding challenges of genetic results interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine E Donohue
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Catherine Gooch
- Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.,Pediatrics, Division of Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Washington University at St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Alexander Katz
- Medical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Jessica Wakelee
- Center for the Study of Community Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Anne Slavotinek
- Division of Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Bruce R Korf
- Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Skinner SJ, Clay AT, McCarron MCE, Liskowich S. Interpretation and management of genetic test results by Canadian family physicians: a multiple choice survey of performance. J Community Genet 2021; 12:479-484. [PMID: 33619689 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-021-00511-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Family physicians (FPs) will encounter genetic concerns within community practice. To determine how FPs compare to genetic counselors (GCs), a cross-sectional survey was distributed to Canadian FPs and GCs in 2019. The survey assessed risk analysis, counseling, and management of genetic information. FPs performed less well than GCs on each survey question and scenario (p < 0.05). Average overall survey scores for FPs were lower than GCs (62% vs. 93%, p < 0.001). Additional genetic training for FPs may help avoid potential harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie J Skinner
- Department of Academic Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Suite 172, 1621 Albert Street, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4P 2S5, Canada
| | - Adam T Clay
- Department of Academic Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Suite 172, 1621 Albert Street, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4P 2S5, Canada
| | - Michelle C E McCarron
- Research Department, Saskatchewan Health Authority, 2180 - 23 Ave, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4S 0A5, Canada
| | - Sarah Liskowich
- Department of Academic Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Suite 172, 1621 Albert Street, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4P 2S5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Haspel RL, Genzen JR, Wagner J, Fong K, Wilcox RL. Call for improvement in medical school training in genetics: results of a national survey. Genet Med 2021; 23:1151-1157. [PMID: 33580224 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01100-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess, from the student perspective, medical school training in genetics and genomics. METHODS In 2019, the Undergraduate Training in Genomics (UTRIG) Working Group developed genetics-related survey and knowledge questions for the RISE-FIRST, an exam administered to postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) pathology residents in the United States during their first months of training. Survey questions focused on perceived knowledge in genetics and the structure and quality of training with responses compared with those in control areas. RESULTS There were 401 PGY1 pathology residents who took the 2019 RISE-FIRST (65% of those in the United States). There was significantly lower perceived understanding of genetics compared with nongenetics topics. Respondents also reported less time spent learning genetics and lower quality training compared with control areas. Only 53% indicated an interaction during medical school with a medical geneticist. Residents also did not perform as well on the UTRIG-developed knowledge questions than those in other areas of pathology. CONCLUSION The RISE-FIRST is a useful tool in assessing the current state of medical school training in genetics. This needs assessment may serve as a call to action to improve medical school genetics education and promote greater understanding of the role of genetics professionals in patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard L Haspel
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan R Genzen
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jay Wagner
- American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Karen Fong
- American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Rebecca L Wilcox
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Vermont Medical Center and Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chacon JA, Cervantes JL, Perry CN, Pfarr CM, Ayoubieh H. Personalized Medicine in Undergraduate Medical Education: a Spiral Learning Model. MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR 2020; 30:1741-1744. [PMID: 34457840 PMCID: PMC8368415 DOI: 10.1007/s40670-020-01066-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Educational strategies to introduce medical students to scientific advances are needed as evidence continues to evolve regarding their clinical application in personalized medicine. Our overall project goal is to design an evidence-based, clinically relevant, personalized medicine curriculum spanning the 4 years of undergraduate medical education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A. Chacon
- Department of Medical Education, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, TX USA
| | - Jorge L. Cervantes
- Department of Medical Education, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, TX USA
| | - Cynthia N. Perry
- Department of Medical Education, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, TX USA
| | - Curt M. Pfarr
- Department of Medical Education, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, TX USA
| | - Houriya Ayoubieh
- Department of Medical Education, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Knowledge and Attitudes of Medical and Health Science Students in the United Arab Emirates toward Genomic Medicine and Pharmacogenomics: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Pers Med 2020; 10:jpm10040191. [PMID: 33114420 PMCID: PMC7711592 DOI: 10.3390/jpm10040191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 10/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Medical and health science students represent future health professionals, and their perceptions are essential to increasing awareness on genomic medicine and pharmacogenomics. Lack of education is one of the significant barriers that may affect health professional’s ability to interpret and communicate pharmacogenomics information and results to their clients. Our aim was to assess medical and health science students’ knowledge, attitudes and perception for a better genomic medicine and pharmacogenomics practice in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). A cross-sectional study was conducted using a validated questionnaire distributed electronically to students recruited using random and snowball sampling methods. A total of 510 students consented and completed the questionnaire between December 2018 and October 2019. The mean knowledge score (SD) for students was 5.4 (±2.7). There were significant differences in the levels of knowledge by the year of study of bachelor’s degree students, the completion status of training or education in pharmacogenomics (PGX) or pharmacogenetics and the completion of an internship or study abroad program (p-values < 0.05. The top two barriers that students identified in the implementation of genomic medicine and pharmacogenomics were lack of training or education (59.7%) and lack of clinical guidelines (58.7%). Concerns regarding confidentiality and discrimination were stated. The majority of medical and health science students had positive attitudes but only had a fair level of knowledge. Stakeholders in the UAE must strive to acquaint their students with up-to-date knowledge of genomic medicine and pharmacogenomics.
Collapse
|
32
|
Ethical challenges of precision cancer medicine. Semin Cancer Biol 2020; 84:263-270. [PMID: 33045356 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Amongst common diseases, cancer is often both a leader in self-regulatory policy, or the field for contentious ethical issues such as the patenting of the BRCA1/2 genes. With the advent of genomic sequencing technologies, achieving precision cancer medicine requires prospective norms due to the large and varied sources of data involved. Here, we discuss the ethical and legal aspects of the policy debate around the relevant topics in precision cancer medicine: the return of incidental findings and sequencing raw data to patients, the communication of genetic results to patients' relatives, privacy and communication risks with concomitant oversight strategies, patient participation and consent models. We present the arguments and empirical data supporting specific policy solutions delineating still contested areas. What type of consent and oversight are required to acquire genomic data or to access it where desired, either by the participant/patient or third-party researchers? Most of the raw sequencing data is still uninterpretable and the variants revealed subject to reinterpretation over time. No doubt the ethical challenges of precision cancer medicine are a prototype of what's to come for other diseases. They are also paradigmatic for regulatory and ethical questions of the translational endeavors since the two worlds - basic science and patient care - are governed by different ethical and legal principles that need to be reconciled in precision cancer medicine.
Collapse
|
33
|
Makhnoon S, Mork M, Arun B, Volk RJ, Peterson SK. Perceptions of provider's epistemic authority in response to variant of uncertain significance-related recommendations. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:10.1002/jgc4.1337. [PMID: 33090616 PMCID: PMC8026756 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Uncertain genetic information such as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) is often encountered by patients in clinical cancer genetic testing. Although healthcare providers facilitate patient's understanding of VUS-associated empirical risk and its medical implications, patients' understanding and perceptions of risk often differ and may be based on subjective evaluations such as their perception of provider's epistemic authority (EA). This study examines the hypothesis that individuals attribute greater EA to genetic counselors (GCs) (compared to gastrointestinal oncologists) and to providers who recommend more active VUS-related recommendations (compared to inactive). In a factorial experiment, 652 adult participants recruited on Amazon Mechanical Turk were block-randomized to read one of 10 different types of VUS-related scenarios in the context of colon cancer (5 recommendation types × 2 provider types). GCs were attributed higher EA than gastrointestinal oncologists (p = <.001). Active recommendations (comprehensive, check back, wrong) were attributed lower EA (M = 3.67, SD = 0.79) compared to the inactive (stand by, disregard) (M = 3.89, SD = 0.67) (p-value = <.001). The wrong recommendation was attributed lowest EA compared to the four correct recommendations (mean difference = -0.34, -0.45, -0.35, and -0.44, respectively; p = .002), which, when dropped from the analysis, showed no difference between the correct active and inactive recommendations (3.78 vs. 3.89, p = .095). The higher EA attributed to GCs is encouraging and possibly explained by increased public awareness of the genetic counseling profession. The lack of difference in EA attributed to various correct, yet incomplete forms of VUS-related recommendation indicates that individuals may be unaware of and thus completely rely on providers for complex medical topics like VUS. Communicating VUS-related uncertainty warrants caution and further research to elucidate best practices and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sukh Makhnoon
- Department of Behavioral Science, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas
| | - Maureen Mork
- Department of Clinical Cancer Genetics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas
| | - Banu Arun
- Department of Clinical Cancer Genetics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas
| | - Robert J Volk
- Department of Health Services Research, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas
| | - Susan K Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Training the next generation of genomic medicine providers: trends in medical education and national assessment. Genet Med 2020; 22:1718-1722. [PMID: 32555416 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0855-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the utilization of genetics on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE®). METHODS A team of clinical genetics educators performed an analysis of the representation of genetics content on a robust sample of recent Step 1, Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK), and Step 3 examination forms. The content of each question was mapped to curriculum recommendations from the peer reviewed Association of Professors of Human and Medical Genetics white paper, Medical School Core Curriculum in Genetics, and the USMLE Content Outline. RESULTS The committee identified 13.4%, 10.4%, and 4.4% of Steps 1, 2 and 3 respectively, as having genetics content. The genetics content of the exams became less pertinent to the questions from Step 1 to 3, with decreasing genetics content by exam and increasing percentages of questions identified as having genetics content in the distractors only. CONCLUSION The current distribution of genetics in USMLE licensing examinations reflects traditional curricular approaches with genetics as a basic science course in the early years of medical school and de-emphasizes clinical relevance of the field. These observations support the notion that further integration is required to move genetics into the clinical curriculum of medical schools and the clinical content of USMLE Step exams.
Collapse
|
35
|
Marchant G, Barnes M, Evans JP, LeRoy B, Wolf SM. From Genetics to Genomics: Facing the Liability Implications in Clinical Care. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2020; 48:11-43. [PMID: 32342786 PMCID: PMC7433684 DOI: 10.1177/1073110520916994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Health care is transitioning from genetics to genomics, in which single-gene testing for diagnosis is being replaced by multi-gene panels, genome-wide sequencing, and other multi-genic tests for disease diagnosis, prediction, prognosis, and treatment. This health care transition is spurring a new set of increased or novel liability risks for health care providers and test laboratories. This article describes this transition in both medical care and liability, and addresses 11 areas of potential increased or novel liability risk, offering recommendations to both health care and legal actors to address and manage those liability risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary Marchant
- Gary Marchant, B.SC., Ph.D., J.D., M.P.P., is Regents' Professor, Lincoln Professor of Emerging Technologies, Law & Ethics, and Faculty Director of the Center for Law, Science & Innovation at ASU. He researches, teaches and speaks about governance of a variety of emerging technologies including genomics, biotechnology, neuroscience, nanotechnology and artificial intelligence. Prior to starting at ASU in 1999, he was a partner in the Washington, DC office of Kirkland & Ellis. Mark Barnes, J.D., LL.M., is a partner in the life sciences practice at Ropes & Gray LLP; teaches health care law and the law of biomedical research at Yale Law School; and is founder and co-director of the Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center (MRCT Center) of Harvard University and Brigham and Women's Hospital. James P. Evans, M.D., Ph.D., is a Medical Geneticist and Internist who is currently retired, but pursued a long-standing interest in genomics and its broad social implications. He is Professor Emeritus, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Genetics. Bonnie LeRoy, M.S., L.G.C., is a licensed genetic counselor with over 20 years of clinical experience. She developed and now directs the Graduate Program in Genetic Counseling at the University of Minnesota. She is a past president of the National Society of Genetic Counselors, the American Board of Genetic Counseling, and the Association of Genetic Counseling Program Directors. Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; Professor of Medicine; and Chair of the Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences at the University of Minnesota. She is a Principal Investigator on the LawSeq project funded by NIH. Institutions are listed for author identification only
| | - Mark Barnes
- Gary Marchant, B.SC., Ph.D., J.D., M.P.P., is Regents' Professor, Lincoln Professor of Emerging Technologies, Law & Ethics, and Faculty Director of the Center for Law, Science & Innovation at ASU. He researches, teaches and speaks about governance of a variety of emerging technologies including genomics, biotechnology, neuroscience, nanotechnology and artificial intelligence. Prior to starting at ASU in 1999, he was a partner in the Washington, DC office of Kirkland & Ellis. Mark Barnes, J.D., LL.M., is a partner in the life sciences practice at Ropes & Gray LLP; teaches health care law and the law of biomedical research at Yale Law School; and is founder and co-director of the Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center (MRCT Center) of Harvard University and Brigham and Women's Hospital. James P. Evans, M.D., Ph.D., is a Medical Geneticist and Internist who is currently retired, but pursued a long-standing interest in genomics and its broad social implications. He is Professor Emeritus, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Genetics. Bonnie LeRoy, M.S., L.G.C., is a licensed genetic counselor with over 20 years of clinical experience. She developed and now directs the Graduate Program in Genetic Counseling at the University of Minnesota. She is a past president of the National Society of Genetic Counselors, the American Board of Genetic Counseling, and the Association of Genetic Counseling Program Directors. Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; Professor of Medicine; and Chair of the Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences at the University of Minnesota. She is a Principal Investigator on the LawSeq project funded by NIH. Institutions are listed for author identification only
| | - James P Evans
- Gary Marchant, B.SC., Ph.D., J.D., M.P.P., is Regents' Professor, Lincoln Professor of Emerging Technologies, Law & Ethics, and Faculty Director of the Center for Law, Science & Innovation at ASU. He researches, teaches and speaks about governance of a variety of emerging technologies including genomics, biotechnology, neuroscience, nanotechnology and artificial intelligence. Prior to starting at ASU in 1999, he was a partner in the Washington, DC office of Kirkland & Ellis. Mark Barnes, J.D., LL.M., is a partner in the life sciences practice at Ropes & Gray LLP; teaches health care law and the law of biomedical research at Yale Law School; and is founder and co-director of the Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center (MRCT Center) of Harvard University and Brigham and Women's Hospital. James P. Evans, M.D., Ph.D., is a Medical Geneticist and Internist who is currently retired, but pursued a long-standing interest in genomics and its broad social implications. He is Professor Emeritus, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Genetics. Bonnie LeRoy, M.S., L.G.C., is a licensed genetic counselor with over 20 years of clinical experience. She developed and now directs the Graduate Program in Genetic Counseling at the University of Minnesota. She is a past president of the National Society of Genetic Counselors, the American Board of Genetic Counseling, and the Association of Genetic Counseling Program Directors. Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; Professor of Medicine; and Chair of the Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences at the University of Minnesota. She is a Principal Investigator on the LawSeq project funded by NIH. Institutions are listed for author identification only
| | - Bonnie LeRoy
- Gary Marchant, B.SC., Ph.D., J.D., M.P.P., is Regents' Professor, Lincoln Professor of Emerging Technologies, Law & Ethics, and Faculty Director of the Center for Law, Science & Innovation at ASU. He researches, teaches and speaks about governance of a variety of emerging technologies including genomics, biotechnology, neuroscience, nanotechnology and artificial intelligence. Prior to starting at ASU in 1999, he was a partner in the Washington, DC office of Kirkland & Ellis. Mark Barnes, J.D., LL.M., is a partner in the life sciences practice at Ropes & Gray LLP; teaches health care law and the law of biomedical research at Yale Law School; and is founder and co-director of the Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center (MRCT Center) of Harvard University and Brigham and Women's Hospital. James P. Evans, M.D., Ph.D., is a Medical Geneticist and Internist who is currently retired, but pursued a long-standing interest in genomics and its broad social implications. He is Professor Emeritus, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Genetics. Bonnie LeRoy, M.S., L.G.C., is a licensed genetic counselor with over 20 years of clinical experience. She developed and now directs the Graduate Program in Genetic Counseling at the University of Minnesota. She is a past president of the National Society of Genetic Counselors, the American Board of Genetic Counseling, and the Association of Genetic Counseling Program Directors. Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; Professor of Medicine; and Chair of the Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences at the University of Minnesota. She is a Principal Investigator on the LawSeq project funded by NIH. Institutions are listed for author identification only
| | - Susan M Wolf
- Gary Marchant, B.SC., Ph.D., J.D., M.P.P., is Regents' Professor, Lincoln Professor of Emerging Technologies, Law & Ethics, and Faculty Director of the Center for Law, Science & Innovation at ASU. He researches, teaches and speaks about governance of a variety of emerging technologies including genomics, biotechnology, neuroscience, nanotechnology and artificial intelligence. Prior to starting at ASU in 1999, he was a partner in the Washington, DC office of Kirkland & Ellis. Mark Barnes, J.D., LL.M., is a partner in the life sciences practice at Ropes & Gray LLP; teaches health care law and the law of biomedical research at Yale Law School; and is founder and co-director of the Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center (MRCT Center) of Harvard University and Brigham and Women's Hospital. James P. Evans, M.D., Ph.D., is a Medical Geneticist and Internist who is currently retired, but pursued a long-standing interest in genomics and its broad social implications. He is Professor Emeritus, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Genetics. Bonnie LeRoy, M.S., L.G.C., is a licensed genetic counselor with over 20 years of clinical experience. She developed and now directs the Graduate Program in Genetic Counseling at the University of Minnesota. She is a past president of the National Society of Genetic Counselors, the American Board of Genetic Counseling, and the Association of Genetic Counseling Program Directors. Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; Professor of Medicine; and Chair of the Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences at the University of Minnesota. She is a Principal Investigator on the LawSeq project funded by NIH. Institutions are listed for author identification only
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hoffman JD, Thompson R, Swenson KB, Dasgupta S. Complexities of Clinical Genetics Consultation: An Interprofessional Clinical Skills Workshop. MEDEDPORTAL : THE JOURNAL OF TEACHING AND LEARNING RESOURCES 2020; 16:10869. [PMID: 32342009 PMCID: PMC7182040 DOI: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Advances in genomic medicine contribute to increased demand for clinical genetics services and require physicians to understand the interprofessional practice of this field. Medical students receive a foundation in genetics during preclinical studies, but variability in clinical experience may limit knowledge of and recruitment into this clinical specialty. In this resource, we describe an approach for simulating exposure to the practice of clinical genetics during the core pediatrics clerkship. METHODS Prior to class, students researched and considered a mock genetics case. In class, each of four small groups discussed two cases demonstrating varied presentations, with facilitation by genetic counseling students. Each case highlighted the variability in presentation, testing, management strategies, and psychosocial issues of a genetics case. Groups reported out to the class, and individuals completed an anonymous evaluation survey. RESULTS Surveys were distributed to nine of 10 pilot sessions (210 of 235 students) with a response rate of 48%. Students frequently reported no previous exposure to seeing patients with genetics professionals, indicated a preference for learning in case discussion format over traditional lectures, and felt the format helped them apply clinical skills and reasoning. Medical students appreciated the opportunity to interact with genetic counseling students in an interdisciplinary setting and desired further educational opportunities regarding delivering complex information to patients and their families. DISCUSSION This session expanded exposure to clinical genetics content and professionals, serving as an important foundation for further development of genetic knowledge during clinical training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jodi D. Hoffman
- Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine
| | - Rachel Thompson
- Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine
| | - Kathleen B. Swenson
- Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Sciences and Education, Boston University School of Medicine
| | - Shoumita Dasgupta
- Professor, Department of Medicine, Biomedical Genetics Section, Boston University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Linderman MD, McElroy L, Chang L. MySeq: privacy-protecting browser-based personal Genome analysis for genomics education and exploration. BMC Med Genomics 2019; 12:172. [PMID: 31775760 PMCID: PMC6882182 DOI: 10.1186/s12920-019-0615-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The complexity of genome informatics is a recurring challenge for genome exploration and analysis by students and other non-experts. This complexity creates a barrier to wider implementation of experiential genomics education, even in settings with substantial computational resources and expertise. Reducing the need for specialized software tools will increase access to hands-on genomics pedagogy. RESULTS MySeq is a React.js single-page web application for privacy-protecting interactive personal genome analysis. All analyses are performed entirely in the user's web browser eliminating the need to install and use specialized software tools or to upload sensitive data to an external web service. MySeq leverages Tabix-indexing to efficiently query whole genome-scale variant call format (VCF) files stored locally or available remotely via HTTP(s) without loading the entire file. MySeq currently implements variant querying and annotation, physical trait prediction, pharmacogenomic, polygenic disease risk and ancestry analyses to provide representative pedagogical examples; and can be readily extended with new analysis or visualization components. CONCLUSIONS MySeq supports multiple pedagogical approaches including independent exploration and interactive online tutorials. MySeq has been successfully employed in an undergraduate human genome analysis course where it reduced the barriers-to-entry for hands-on human genome analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Leo McElroy
- Department of Computer Science, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT USA
| | - Laura Chang
- Department of Computer Science, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mazzola SE, O'Connor B, Yashar BM. Primary care physicians’ understanding and utilization of pediatric exome sequencing results. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:1130-1138. [DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E. Mazzola
- Genomic Medicine Institute Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland Ohio
- Department of Human Genetics University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan
| | - Bridget O'Connor
- Division of Pediatric Genetics University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan
| | - Beverly M. Yashar
- Department of Human Genetics University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wong YKE, Lam KW, Ho KY, Yu CSA, Cho CSW, Tsang HF, Chu MKM, Ng PWL, Tai CSW, Chan LWC, Wong EYL, Wong SCC. The applications of big data in molecular diagnostics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2019; 19:905-917. [PMID: 31422710 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2019.1657834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yin Kwan Evelyn Wong
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Ka Wai Lam
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Ka Yi Ho
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | | | - Chi Shing William Cho
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Hin Fung Tsang
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Man Kee Maggie Chu
- Department of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Po Wah Lawrence Ng
- Department of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Chi Shing William Tai
- Department of Applied Biology and Chemical Technology, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Lawrence Wing Chi Chan
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Elaine Yue Ling Wong
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Sze Chuen Cesar Wong
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Medical genetics and genomics education and its impact on genomic literacy of the clinical workforce. Genet Med 2019; 21:1259-1260. [PMID: 31048815 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
|
41
|
Delivering genomic medicine in the United Kingdom National Health Service: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Genet Med 2019; 21:2667-2675. [PMID: 31186523 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0579-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to assess the readiness of the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service to implement a Genomic Medicine Service. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify what is known about factors related to the implementation of genomic medicine in routine health care and to draw out the implications for the UK and other settings. METHODS Relevant studies were identified in Web of Science and PubMed from their date of inception to April 2018. The review included primary research studies using quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods, and systematic reviews. A narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS Fifty-five studies met our inclusion criteria. The majority of studies reviewed were conducted in the United States. We identified four domains: (1) systems, (2) training and workforce needs, (3) professional attitudes and values, and (4) the role of patients and the public. CONCLUSION Mainstreaming genomic medicine into routine clinical practice requires actions at each level of the health-care system. Our synthesis emphasized the organizational, social, and cultural implications of reforming practice, highlighting that demonstration of clinical utility and cost-effectiveness, attending to the compatibility of genomic medicine with clinical principles, and involving and engaging patients are key to successful implementation.
Collapse
|
42
|
Primary Care Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Experience with Personal Genetic Testing. J Pers Med 2019; 9:jpm9020029. [PMID: 31137623 PMCID: PMC6617198 DOI: 10.3390/jpm9020029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Revised: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary care providers (PCPs) will play an important role in precision medicine. However, their lack of training and knowledge about genetics and genomics may limit their ability to advise patients or interpret or utilize test results. We evaluated PCPs’ awareness of the role of genetics/genomics in health, knowledge about key concepts in genomic medicine, perception/attitudes towards direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing, and their level of confidence/comfort in discussing testing with patients prior to and after undergoing DTC testing through the 23andMe Health + Ancestry Service. A total of 130 PCPs completed the study. Sixty-three percent were board-certified in family practice, 32% graduated between 1991 and 2000, and 88% had heard of 23andMe prior to the study. Seventy-two percent decided to participate in the study to gain a better understanding about testing. At baseline, 23% of respondents indicated comfort discussing genetics as a risk factor for common diseases, increasing to 59% after undergoing personal genetic testing (PGT) (p < 0.01). In summary, we find that undergoing PGT augments physicians’ confidence, comfort, and interest in DTC testing.
Collapse
|
43
|
Hyland K, Garber K, Dasgupta S. From helices to health: undergraduate medical education in genetics and genomics. Per Med 2019; 16:211-220. [DOI: 10.2217/pme-2018-0081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Rapid advances in genomic technologies combined with drastic reductions in cost and a growing number of clinical genomic tests are transforming medical practice. While enthusiasm about applications of precision medicine is high, the existing clinical genetics workforce is insufficient to meet present demands and will fall increasingly short as the use of genetic and genomic testing becomes more routine. To address this shortage, physicians in all areas of medicine will require genomic literacy. Undergraduate medical students, therefore, need a solid foundation in genetics and genomics so they can apply genomic medicine across a range of specialties. Here, we review the current trends and challenges in undergraduate medical genetics education in North America, highlight innovations and offer recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Hyland
- Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, School of Medicine, Institute for Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Kathryn Garber
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30307, USA
| | - Shoumita Dasgupta
- Department of Medicine, Biomedical Genetics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rubanovich CK, Cheung C, Torkamani A, Bloss CS. Physician Communication of Genomic Results in a Diagnostic Odyssey Case Series. Pediatrics 2019; 143:S44-S53. [PMID: 30600271 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-1099i] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The availability of whole genome sequencing (WGS) is increasing in clinical care, and WGS is a promising tool in diagnostic odyssey cases. Physicians' ability to effectively communicate genomic information with patients, however, is unclear. In this multiperspective study, we assessed physicians' communication of patient genome sequencing information in a diagnostic odyssey case series. METHODS We evaluated physician communication of genome sequencing results in the context of an ongoing study of the utility of WGS for the diagnosis of rare and idiopathic diseases. A modified version of the Medical Communication Competence Scale was used to compare patients' ratings of their physicians' communication of general medical information to communication of genome sequencing information. Physician self-ratings were also compared with patient ratings. RESULTS A total of 47 patients, parents, and physicians across 11 diagnostic odyssey cases participated. In 6 of 11 cases (54%), the patient respondent rated the physician's communication of genome sequencing information as worse than that of general medical information. In 9 of 11 cases (82%), physician self-ratings of communication of genome sequencing information were worse than the patient respondent's rating. Identification of a diagnosis via WGS was positively associated with physician self-ratings (P = .021) but was not associated with patient respondent ratings (P = .959). CONCLUSIONS These findings reveal that even in diagnostic odyssey cases, in which genome sequencing may be clinically beneficial, physicians may not be well-equipped to communicate genomic information to patients. Future studies may benefit from multiperspective approaches to assessing and understanding physician-patient communication of genome-sequencing information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caryn Kseniya Rubanovich
- San Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA
| | | | - Ali Torkamani
- Scripps Genomic Medicine Division, Scripps Translational Science Institute, Scripps Health, La Jolla, CA.,Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA; and
| | - Cinnamon S Bloss
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Rubanovich CK, Cheung C, Mandel J, Bloss CS. Physician preparedness for big genomic data: a review of genomic medicine education initiatives in the United States. Hum Mol Genet 2018; 27:R250-R258. [PMID: 29750248 PMCID: PMC6061688 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddy170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2018] [Revised: 05/02/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last decade, genomic medicine education initiatives have surfaced across the spectrum of physician training in order to help address a gap in genomic medicine preparedness among physicians. The approaches are diverse and stem from the belief that 21st century physicians must be proficient in genomic medicine applications as they will be leaders in the precision medicine movement. We conducted a review of literature in genomic medicine education and training for medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing physicians with articles published between June 2015 and January 2018 to gain a picture of the current state of genomic medicine education with a focus on the United States. We found evidence of progress in the development of new and innovative educational programs and other resources aimed at increasing physician knowledge and readiness. Three overarching educational approach themes emerged, including immersive and experiential learning; interdisciplinary and interprofessional education; and electronic- and web-based approaches. This review is not exhaustive, nevertheless, it may inform future directions and improvements for genomic medicine education. Important next-steps include: (i) identifying and studying ways to best implement low-cost dissemination of genomic information; (ii) emphasizing genomic medicine education program evaluation and (iii) incorporating interprofessional and interdisciplinary initiatives. Genomic medicine education and training will become more and more relevant in the years to come as physicians increasingly interact with genomic and other precision medicine technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caryn Kseniya Rubanovich
- San Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Cynthia Cheung
- The Qualcomm Institute of Calit2, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Jess Mandel
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Cinnamon S Bloss
- The Qualcomm Institute of Calit2, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Departments of Psychiatry and Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bioinformatics for medical students: a 5-year experience using OMIM® in medical student education. Genet Med 2018; 21:493-497. [PMID: 29930391 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0076-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2018] [Accepted: 05/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Given advances in genomic medicine, medical students need increased confidence in clinical genetics skills to address multiple genetic conditions. After success of first-year medical school instruction in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM®) database, we report the impact on gaining confidence in broad clinical genetics skills in 5 subsequent years. METHODS We collected 5 years of successive pre- and postintervention survey based self-assessments on medical student use of genetic medicine information resources and confidence in genetic medicine skills. To assess retention of confidence in these skills, we administered a follow-up survey to students after 1-2 years of clinical rotations. RESULTS We found a consistent, statistically significant increase in students' confidence in clinical genetics skills after the first-year OMIM educational session, with confidence retention above baseline up to 2 years after the educational exposure. Skills include ability to generate a differential diagnosis for genetic conditions, share information with patients and families, and find accurate information on genetic conditions. The majority agreed that increased use of OMIM will better prepare students to achieve these skills. CONCLUSION Integration of the OMIM database in first-year education is an effective instructional tool that may provide a lasting increase in confidence in clinical genetics skills.
Collapse
|
47
|
Wilcox RL, Adem PV, Afshinnekoo E, Atkinson JB, Burke LW, Cheung H, Dasgupta S, DeLaGarza J, Joseph L, LeGallo R, Lew M, Lockwood CM, Meiss A, Norman J, Markwood P, Rizvi H, Shane-Carson KP, Sobel ME, Suarez E, Tafe LJ, Wang J, Haspel RL. The Undergraduate Training in Genomics (UTRIG) Initiative: early & active training for physicians in the genomic medicine era. Per Med 2018; 15:199-208. [PMID: 29843583 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2017-0077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Genomic medicine is transforming patient care. However, the speed of development has left a knowledge gap between discovery and effective implementation into clinical practice. Since 2010, the Training Residents in Genomics (TRIG) Working Group has found success in building a rigorous genomics curriculum with implementation tools aimed at pathology residents in postgraduate training years 1-4. Based on the TRIG model, the interprofessional Undergraduate Training in Genomics (UTRIG) Working Group was formed. Under the aegis of the Undergraduate Medical Educators Section of the Association of Pathology Chairs and representation from nine additional professional societies, UTRIG's collaborative goal is building medical student genomic literacy through development of a ready-to-use genomics curriculum. Key elements to the UTRIG curriculum are expert consensus-driven objectives, active learning methods, rigorous assessment and integration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca L Wilcox
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, University of Vermont Medical Center, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA
| | - Patricia V Adem
- Department of Pathology, New York Medical College School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA
| | - Ebrahim Afshinnekoo
- Department of Pathology, New York Medical College School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA
| | - James B Atkinson
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
| | - Leah W Burke
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, University of Vermont Medical Center, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA
| | - Hoiwan Cheung
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH/Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA
| | - Shoumita Dasgupta
- Department of Medicine, Biomedical Genetics Section, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Julia DeLaGarza
- Department of Pathology, New York Medical College School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA
| | - Loren Joseph
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Robin LeGallo
- Department of Pathology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA
| | - Madelyn Lew
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Christina M Lockwood
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Alice Meiss
- Department of Pathology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA
| | | | | | - Hasan Rizvi
- Institue of Health Sciences Education, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, E1 2AD, UK
| | - Kate P Shane-Carson
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Mark E Sobel
- American Society for Investigative Pathology, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA
| | - Eric Suarez
- Pathology Department, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA
| | - Laura J Tafe
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH/Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA
| | - Jason Wang
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Richard L Haspel
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Weber KS, Bridgewater LC, Jensen JL, Breakwell DP, Nielsen BL, Johnson SM. Personal microbiome analysis improves student engagement and interest in Immunology, Molecular Biology, and Genomics undergraduate courses. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0193696. [PMID: 29641525 PMCID: PMC5894996 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 02/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
A critical area of emphasis for science educators is the identification of effective means of teaching and engaging undergraduate students. Personal microbiome analysis is a means of identifying the microbial communities found on or in our body. We hypothesized the use of personal microbiome analysis in the classroom could improve science education by making courses more applied and engaging for undergraduate students. We determined to test this prediction in three Brigham Young University undergraduate courses: Immunology, Advanced Molecular Biology Laboratory, and Genomics. These three courses have a two-week microbiome unit and students during the 2016 semester students could submit their own personal microbiome kit or use the demo data, whereas during the 2017 semester students were given access to microbiome data from an anonymous individual. The students were surveyed before, during, and after the human microbiome unit to determine whether analyzing their own personal microbiome data, compared to analyzing demo microbiome data, impacted student engagement and interest. We found that personal microbiome analysis significantly enhanced the engagement and interest of students while completing microbiome assignments, the self-reported time students spent researching the microbiome during the two week microbiome unit, and the attitudes of students regarding the course overall. Thus, we found that integrating personal microbiome analysis in the classroom was a powerful means of improving student engagement and interest in undergraduate science courses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. Scott Weber
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Laura C. Bridgewater
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America
| | - Jamie L. Jensen
- Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America
| | - Donald P. Breakwell
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America
| | - Brent L. Nielsen
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America
| | - Steven M. Johnson
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Technologies such as next-generation sequencing and chromosomal microarray have advanced the understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of a variety of renal disorders. Genetic findings are increasingly used to inform the clinical management of many nephropathies, enabling targeted disease surveillance, choice of therapy, and family counselling. Genetic analysis has excellent diagnostic utility in paediatric nephrology, as illustrated by sequencing studies of patients with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Although additional investigation is needed, pilot studies suggest that genetic testing can also provide similar diagnostic insight among adult patients. Reaching a genetic diagnosis first involves choosing the appropriate testing modality, as guided by the clinical presentation of the patient and the number of potential genes associated with the suspected nephropathy. Genome-wide sequencing increases diagnostic sensitivity relative to targeted panels, but holds the challenges of identifying causal variants in the vast amount of data generated and interpreting secondary findings. In order to realize the promise of genomic medicine for kidney disease, many technical, logistical, and ethical questions that accompany the implementation of genetic testing in nephrology must be addressed. The creation of evidence-based guidelines for the utilization and implementation of genetic testing in nephrology will help to translate genetic knowledge into improved clinical outcomes for patients with kidney disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily E Groopman
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 1150 Saint Nicholas Avenue, Russ Berrie Pavilion #412C, New York, New York 10032, USA
| | - Hila Milo Rasouly
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 1150 Saint Nicholas Avenue, Russ Berrie Pavilion #412C, New York, New York 10032, USA
| | - Ali G Gharavi
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 1150 Saint Nicholas Avenue, Russ Berrie Pavilion #412C, New York, New York 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Blizinsky KD, Bonham VL. Leveraging the Learning Health Care Model to Improve Equity in the Age of Genomic Medicine. Learn Health Syst 2018; 2:e10046. [PMID: 29457138 PMCID: PMC5813818 DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2017] [Revised: 09/22/2017] [Accepted: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
To fully achieve the goals of a genomics-enabled learning health care system, purposeful efforts to understand and reduce health disparities and improve equity of care are essential. This paper highlights three major challenges facing genomics-enabled learning health care systems, as they pertain to ancestrally diverse populations: inequality in the utility of genomic medicine; lack of access to pharmacogenomics in clinical care; and inadequate incorporation of social and environmental data into the electronic health care record (EHR). We advance a framework that can not only be used to directly improve care for all within the learning health system, but can also be used to focus on the needs to address racial and ethnic health disparities and improve health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine D. Blizinsky
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research InstituteNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaMaryland
- All of Us Research ProgramNational Institutes of HealthRockvilleMaryland
- Rush Alzheimer's Disease CenterRush UniversityChicagoIllinois
| | - Vence L. Bonham
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research InstituteNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaMaryland
| |
Collapse
|