Significance of angiotensin II receptor blockers with high affinity to angiotensin II type 1 receptors for vascular protection in rats

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in animal models of vascular, cardiac, metabolic and renal disease

We have reviewed the effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (ARBs) in various animal models of hypertension, atherosclerosis, cardiac function, hypertrophy and fibrosis, glucose and lipid metabolism, and renal function and morphology. Those of azilsartan and telmisartan have been included comprehensively whereas those of other ARBs have been included systematically but without intention of completeness. ARBs as a class lower blood pressure in established hypertension and prevent hypertension development in all applicable animal models except those with a markedly suppressed renin-angiotensin system; blood pressure lowering even persists for a considerable time after discontinuation of treatment. This translates into a reduced mortality, particularly in models exhibiting marked hypertension. The retrieved data on vascular, cardiac and renal function and morphology as well as on glucose and lipid metabolism are discussed to address three main questions: 1. Can ARB effects on blood vessels, heart, kidney and metabolic function be explained by blood pressure lowering alone or are they additionally directly related to blockade of the renin-angiotensin system? 2. Are they shared by other inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system, e.g. angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors? 3. Are some effects specific for one or more compounds within the ARB class? Taken together these data profile ARBs as a drug class with unique properties that have beneficial effects far beyond those on blood pressure reduction and, in some cases distinct from those of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. The clinical relevance of angiotensin receptor-independent effects of some ARBs remains to be determined.

Chymase inhibition improves vascular dysfunction and survival in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the role of chymase in hypertension, we evaluated the effect of a chymase inhibitor, TY-51469, on vascular dysfunction and survival in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR-SP).

METHODS

SHR-SP were treated with TY-51469 (1 mg/kg per day) or placebo from 4 to 12 weeks old or until death. Wistar-Kyoto rats were used as a normal group.

RESULTS

SBP was significantly higher in both the placebo and TY-51469 groups than in the normal group, but there was no significant difference between the two treatment groups. Plasma renin, angiotensin-converting enzyme activity and angiotensin II levels were not different between the placebo and TY-51469 groups. In contrast, vascular chymase-like activity was significantly higher in the placebo than in the normal group, but it was reduced by TY-51469. Acetylcholine-induced vascular relaxation was significantly higher in the TY-51469 group than in the placebo group. There was significant augmentation of the number of monocytes/macrophages and matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity in aortic tissue from the placebo group compared with the normal group, and these changes were attenuated by TY-51469. There were also significant increases in mRNA levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and tumor necrosis factor-α in the placebo group that were attenuated by TY-51469. Cumulative survival was significantly prolonged in the TY-51469 group compared with the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

Chymase might play an important role in vascular dysfunction via augmentation both of matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity and monocyte/macrophage accumulation in SHR-SP, and its inhibition may be useful for preventing vascular remodeling and prolonging survival.

Blood pressure variability, impaired autonomic function and vascular senescence in aged spontaneously hypertensive rats are ameliorated by angiotensin blockade

OBJECTIVE

Elderly hypertensive patients are characterized by blood pressure (BP) variability, impaired autonomic function, and vascular endothelial dysfunction and stiffness. However, the mechanisms causing these conditions are unclear. The present study examined the effect of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on aged spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR).

METHODS

We surgically implanted telemetry devices in SHR and WKY at the age of 15 weeks (Young) and 80 weeks (Aged). Aged SHR were orally administered either olmesartan or valsartan once daily at 19:00 h (at the beginning of the dark period (active phase)) for 4 weeks to examine the effects on BP variability, impaired autonomic function, and vascular senescence.

RESULTS

Aging and hypertension in SHR additively caused the following: increased low frequency (LF) power of systolic BP, a decreased spontaneous baroreceptor reflex gain (sBRG), increased BP variability, increased urinary norepinephrine excretion, increased vascular senescence-related beta-galactosidase positive cells and oxidative stress. Treatment with olmesartan or valsartan significantly ameliorated these changes in aged SHR. However, olmesartan ameliorated these changes in aged SHR better than valsartan. The reductions in BP caused by olmesartan in aged SHR were sustained longer than reductions by valsartan. This result indicates longer-lasting inhibition of the AT1 receptor by olmesartan than by valsartan.

CONCLUSION

ARBs ameliorated autonomic dysfunction, BP variability, and vascular senescence in aged SHR. Olmesartan ameliorated the aging-related disorders better than valsartan and was associated with longer-lasting AT1 receptor inhibition by olmesartan. Thus, the magnitude of improvement of these aging-related abnormalities differs for ARBs.

Cardiorenal protection in experimental hypertension with renal failure: comparison between vasopeptidase inhibition and angiotensin receptor blockade

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to compare the preventive impact of treatment with a vasopeptidase inhibitor (VPI) with an angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) on left ventricular (LV) function and renal damage in rats with renal failure after 5/6 renal ablation (Nx).

METHODS

Rats (n = 15-20, each group) underwent either sham-operation (Sham) or 5/6 renal ablation (Nx). Two additional groups of Nx-animals (groups Nx-VPI and Nx-ARB) were treated with the VPI ilepatril (AVE7688, 30 mg kg(-1) d(-1)) or with the ARB olmesartan (10 mg kg(-1 )d(-1)). Animals were followed for 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Systolic blood pressure (SBP), LV hypertrophy (LVH) and LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) were increased 4 weeks after Nx (p < 0.05). LV pressure rise (+dP/dt/LVPmax), LV pressure fall (-dP/dt/LVPmax), and creatinine clearance decreased, while albuminuria and renal glomerulosclerosis index (GSI) increased with Nx (p < 0.05, respectively). In comparison to Nx, treatment with both VPI and ARB normalized SBP, LVH, LVEDP, +dP/dt/LVPmax, and -dP/dt/LVPmax to Sham control levels. GSI, but not creatinine clearance, was also normalized in response to both treatments. The significant increase in albuminuria observed in Nx (+230-fold versus Sham, p < 0.0001) was partially reduced in Nx-VPI (+47-fold versus Sham, p < 0.0001) and fully abolished in Nx-ARB.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ilepatril and olmesartan conferred strong cardiorenal protective effects in rats with renal failure. While cardioprotection was clearly comparable with both treatment regimens, the ARB provided a better protection against the increase in albuminuria, although renal function and structural kidney changes were similarly affected by the VIP and ARB.

Powerful vascular protection by combining cilnidipine with valsartan in stroke-prone, spontaneously hypertensive rats

Cilnidipine is an L- and N-type calcium channel blocker (CCB), and amlodipine is an L-type CCB. Valsartan (10 mg kg(-1)), valsartan (10 mg kg(-1)) and amlodipine (1 mg kg(-1)), and valsartan (10 mg kg(-1)) and cilnidipine (1 mg kg(-1)) were administered once daily for 2 weeks to stroke-prone, spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR-SPs). Blood pressure was significantly reduced by valsartan, and it was further reduced by the combination therapies. Vascular endothelial dysfunction was significantly attenuated in all therapeutic groups, and further significant attenuation was observed in the valsartan+cilnidipine-treated group, but not in the valsartan+amlodipine-treated group. Vascular nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase subunit NOX1 gene expression was significantly attenuated in all therapeutic groups, and significantly greater attenuation was observed in the valsartan+cilnidipine-treated group than in the valsartan-treated group. Compared with the valsartan-treated group, the positive areas for 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal were significantly lower only in the valsartan+cilnidipine-treated group. Plasma renin activity was significantly augmented in the valsartan-treated group, and it was significantly attenuated in the valsartan+cilnidipine-treated group. A significant increase in the ratio of plasma angiotensin-(1-7) to angiotensin II was observed only in the valsartan+cilnidipine-treated group. Vascular angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene expression was significantly attenuated only in the valsartan+cilnidipine-treated group, but ACE2 gene expression was significantly higher in all of the therapeutic groups. Thus, valsartan and cilnidipine combination therapy might have a powerful protective effect in the vascular tissues via increases in the angiotensin-(1-7)/angiotensin II ratio in plasma.

Targeting NADPH oxidases in vascular pharmacology

Oxidative stress is a molecular dysregulation in reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolism, which plays a key role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, vascular inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. It is characterized by a loss of nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability. Large clinical trials such as HOPE and HPS have not shown a clinical benefit of antioxidant vitamin C or vitamin E treatment, putting into question the role of oxidative stress in cardiovascular disease. A change in the understanding of the molecular nature of oxidative stress has been driven by the results of these trials. Oxidative stress is no longer perceived as a simple imbalance between the production and scavenging of ROS, but as a dysfunction of enzymes involved in ROS production. NADPH oxidases are at the center of these events, underlying the dysfunction of other oxidases including eNOS uncoupling, xanthine oxidase and mitochondrial dysfunction. Thus NADPH oxidases are important therapeutic targets. Indeed, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) as well as drugs interfering with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibit NADPH oxidase activation and expression. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, AT1 receptor antagonists (sartans) and aliskiren, as well as spironolactone or eplerenone, have been discussed. Molecular aspects of NADPH oxidase regulation must be considered, while thinking about novel pharmacological targeting of this family of enzymes consisting of several homologs Nox1, Nox2, Nox3, Nox4 and Nox5 in humans. In order to properly design trials of antioxidant therapies, we must develop reliable techniques for the assessment of local and systemic oxidative stress. Classical antioxidants could be combined with novel oxidase inhibitors. In this review, we discuss NADPH oxidase inhibitors such as VAS2870, VAS3947, GK-136901, S17834 or plumbagin. Therefore, our efforts must focus on generating small molecular weight inhibitors of NADPH oxidases, allowing the selective inhibition of dysfunctional NADPH oxidase homologs. This appears to be the most reasonable approach, potentially much more efficient than non-selective scavenging of all ROS by the administration of antioxidants.

Irbesartan prevents metabolic syndrome in rats via activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ

Irbesartan, an angiotensin-receptor blocker, is a known agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) γ. In this study, thirteen-week-old spontaneously hypertensive (SHR)/NDmcr-cp rats, representing a genetic model of metabolic syndrome, were treated daily with placebo, irbesartan (30 mg/kg), valsartan (10 mg/kg), or pioglitazone (10 mg/kg) for 4 weeks. Significant reductions in systolic blood pressure were seen in the irbesartan- and valsartan-treated groups, but not in the pioglitazone-treated group. Compared with the placebo group, plasma insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index, and plasma triglyceride levels were significantly lower while plasma adiponectin levels were significantly higher in the pioglitazone- and irbesartan-treated groups, but not in the valsartan-treated group. Significant increases in the gene expression of adiponectin and GLUT4 within adipose tissue were also observed in the pioglitazone- and irbesartan-treated groups, but not in the valsartan-treated group. These findings suggest that through PPARγ stimulation along with angiotensin II inhibition, irbesartan may be an optimal treatment option in the prevention of metabolic syndrome as well as hypertension.

Angiotensin inhibition and longevity: a question of hydration

With the advancement of medical and investigative science, it is somewhat surprising that although it is possible to stabilise medical patients with hypertension and the associated kidney dysfunction, obesity, diabetes and even cancer, there is still no clear method of significantly reducing these chronic disease pathologies, and thus, extending life expectancy. There is one hormone common to these pathologies, the antagonism of which goes some way to clinical improvements, and this is angiotensin, which is released during hypovolaemia. Angiotensin antagonists are used to treat many of these pathologies, and it has been shown in the obesity literature that angiotensin antagonists decrease weight, but also increase the drinking of water. Increased cellular hydration, and hence, improved mitochondrial metabolism could be one of the mechanisms for the reduction in weight seen in these studies, as well as for reducing the other pathologies, all showing metabolic dysfunction. It appears that the application of straightforward physiological regulation might be an appropriate medical approach to the prevention of hypertension, kidney disease, obesity, diabetes and cancer, and thus, to an increased life expectancy.

Candesartan and amlodipine combination therapy provides powerful vascular protection in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats

The vascular protective effects of placebo, candesartan (1 mg kg(-1) per day) monotherapy, candesartan (1 mg kg(-1) per day) and amlodipine (1 mg kg(-1) per day) combination therapy, and candesartan (1 mg kg(-1) per day) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) (10 mg kg(-1) per day) combination therapy for 2 weeks were compared in stroke-prone, spontaneously hypertensive rats. Candesartan monotherapy significantly reduced blood pressure, and both combination therapies were equally and significantly lower than the monotherapy. Acetylcholine-induced vascular relaxation was significantly stronger in all therapeutic groups than in the placebo-treated group. Furthermore, the relaxation was significantly stronger in the candesartan plus amlodipine-treated group than in the candesartan-treated group; however, there was no significant difference between the candesartan- and candesartan plus HCTZ-treated groups. Vascular gene expressions of the NADPH oxidase subunits p22(phox), gp91(phox), NOX1 and NOX4 were significantly attenuated in all therapeutic groups compared with the placebo-treated group, and there were no significant differences among those groups. However, a significant augmentation of vascular superoxide dismutase activity was observed in the candesartan plus amlodipine-treated group, but not in other groups. Malondialdehyde levels in the vascular tissues were significantly attenuated in all therapeutic groups. Compared with the candesartan-treated group, significant attenuation was observed in the candesartan plus amlodipine-treated group, but not in the candesartan plus HCTZ-treated group. Immunohistological analysis showed that areas positive for 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal were significantly reduced in all therapeutic groups, but this reduction was significantly greater for the candesartan plus amlodipine-treated group than for the candesartan-treated group. Thus, candesartan and amlodipine combination therapy could have a powerful protective effect in vascular tissues via the reduction of oxidative stress.

Combination therapy with irbesartan and efonidipine for attenuation of proteinuria in Dahl salt-sensitive rats

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) or T- and L-type calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are useful for glomerular protection; however, the protective effects of combination therapy remain unclear. In this study, Dahl salt-sensitive rats were fed a high-salt diet and were treated daily with placebo, irbesartan (60 mg kg(-1)), efonidipine (30 mg kg(-1)), irbesartan (60 mg kg(-1))+efonidipine (30 mg kg(-1)), amlodipine (3 mg kg(-1)), or irbesartan (60 mg kg(-1))+amlodipine (3 mg kg(-1)) for 4 weeks. Significant reductions in systolic blood pressure were seen in the irbesartan-, efonidipine- and amlodipine-treated groups compared with the placebo-treated group; a further significant reduction was seen in the irbesartan+efonidipine-treated group compared with the irbesartan-treated group. Compared with the placebo-treated group, proteinuria was significantly lower in the irbesartan- and efonidipine-treated groups, but not in the amlodipine-treated group. Furthermore, a significant attenuation of proteinuria in the irbesartan+efonidipine-treated group compared with the irbesartan-treated group was observed; this effect was not observed in the irbesartan+amlodipine-treated group. The glomerulosclerosis index was significantly attenuated by all active treatments except amlodipine. The glomerulosclerosis index in the irbesartan+efonidipine-treated group, but not in the irbesartan+amlodipine-treated group, was significantly lower than that in the irbesartan-treated group. Significant attenuations of gene expressions of p22(phox), transforming growth factor-beta, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and collegen I were observed in the irbesartan- and efonidipine-treated groups, but not in the amlodipine-treated group. Values for these parameters were reduced to control levels in the irbesartan+efonidipine-treated group. Combination therapy with ARB and T- and L-type CCB might produce a powerful renal protective effect.