One-year effectiveness and safety of open-label losartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in Japanese patients with hypertension uncontrolled with ARBs or ACE inhibitors

Clinical efficacy of various anti-hypertensive regimens in hypertensive women of Punjab; a longitudinal cohort study

BACKGROUND

Gender wise differences exist in anti-hypertensive treatment outcomes, yet still un-explored in Pakistan. Thus, we aimed to estimate the clinical efficacy of four different anti-hypertensive regimens in hypertensive women of Punjab, Pakistan.

METHODS

A longitudinal cohort study of 12 months duration was conducted by enrolling 300 hypertensive women on four anti-hypertensive regimens. Chi-square for significance, logistic regression for association and multilevel regression for changes in outcomes were used.

RESULTS

Majority of subjects were < 60 years of age, weighing > 65 Kg, having family history, married and hailing from urban areas, with diabetes as the most common comorbidity. Hypertension, adjusted for covariates, was significantly associated with salt intake (OR:2.27, p <  0.01) and physical activity (OR;2.16, p <  0.01). High-risk subjects, compared to low-risk, were consuming more fat (OR;1.54), meat (OR; 2), salt (OR; 2.48) and even vegetables/fruits (OR;3.43). Compared to baseline, the maximum reduction in BP was observed with combination therapy, N-GITS+LTN + HCT (SBP; - 50.17, p <  0.01, DBP; - 16.55, p <  0.01), followed by N-GITS alone (SBP; - 28.89, p <  0.01, DBP; - 12.21, p <  0.01). Compared to baseline, adjusted for treatment effects, significant reductions in SBP (low-risk; - 17.92, p <  0.01 high-risk; - 19.48, p <  0.01) and DBP (low-risk; - 17.92, p <  0.01, high-risk; - 19.48, p <  0.01) were observed in low and high risk patients. Among all four cohorts, orthostatic hypotension and edema were common in N-GITS+LTN + HCT only, but variable effects were observed on biochemical values; urea, BSR and creatinine.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, compared to a single agent, combination therapy conferred improved BP controls followed by N-GITS alone in low and high risk women with manageable side effects.

Mechanism of the blood pressure-lowering effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in obese patients with type 2 diabetes

Background

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are reported to have BP-lowering effect in addition to blood glucose-lowering effect, however, its mechanism is still unknown. This study aimed to investigate the mechanism of blood pressure (BP) lowering effects of SGLT2 inhibitors using 24-h urinary collection in obese type 2 diabetes patients.

Methods

Twenty patients with type 2 diabetes (age 48.2 ± 10.7 years, BMI 33.0 ± 4.9 kg/m²) were enrolled. Urine volume, 24-h urinary glucose and sodium excretion, and BP at baseline and 2 weeks and 6 months after administration were measured. Body weight, glycosylated hemoglobin, and BP were evaluated before and 1, 3, and 6 months after SGLT2 inhibitor administration. We evaluated the changes in urine volume and urinary excretion of glucose and sodium as well as correlations among urine volume and urinary sodium glucose excretion at 2 weeks and 6 months after administration of the SGLT2 inhibitors. Furthermore, we investigated the correlations between changes in BP and urinary excretion of sodium and glucose at the same time.

Results

Two weeks after administration, systolic BP (SBP) significantly decreased (128.5 ± 11.0 to 123.2 ± 9.8 mmHg, P = 0.0314), but diastolic BP (DBP) did not (74.4 ± 10.4 to 73.4 ± 8.5 mmHg, P = 0.5821). The decreased SBP significantly correlated with increased urinary glucose excretion (R = −0.62, P = 0.0073), but not increased urinary sodium excretion. At 6 months, SBP (118.6 ± 11.0 mmHg, P = 0.0041) and DBP (68.4 mmHg, P = 0.0363) significantly decreased. The decreased SBP significantly correlated with increased urinary sodium excretion (R = −0.60, P = 0.0014), but not increased urinary glucose excretion.

Conclusions

SGLT2 inhibitors significantly decreased SBP after 1 month and DBP after 6 months in obese patients with type 2 diabetes. The main mechanism of the BP-lowering effect may be plasma volume reduction by osmotic diuresis at 2 weeks and by natriuresis at 6 months after SGLT2 inhibitor administration.

Antihypertensive effectiveness of combination therapy with losartan/hydrochlorothiazide for 'real world' management of isolated systolic hypertension

OBJECTIVES

The guidelines for hypertension require the presence of compelling indications for pharmacological management of hypertension associated with various diseases. Data mainly obtained through randomized controlled trials have provided evidence supporting effectiveness of the combination of losartan (Lo) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) for management of hypertensive patients. However, there have been few reports discussing the effectiveness of Lo/HTCZ (losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothizide 12.5 mg) in the 'real world' in the management of isolated systolic hypertension (ISH). This study was designed to investigate the 'real world' effectiveness of Lo/HTCZ-based treatment of ISH associated with various diseases.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, uncontrolled analysis of data derived from a large, cross-sectional web-based clinical database collected by physicians.

RESULTS

Of 24,825 eligible patients, 20,726 were followed during a 6-month period. Among these, subjects for analysis included those with systolic blood pressure (SBP) >140 mmHg and diastolic BP (DBP) <90 mmHg; patients with diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease were excluded. A total of 15,846 patients were analysed. Among the various complications, hypercholesterolemia was the most frequent concomitant cardiovascular (CV) risk factor (48.1%), followed by obesity (16.3%). Associated clinical conditions were cerebrovascular diseases (9.6%), ischemic heart disease (7.9%) and left ventricular hypertrophy (4.6%). Total numbers of patients exhibiting any type of complications were 62% (≤64 years old), 69% (65-74 years old) and 67% (≥75 years old) (stratification of age). Mean SBP/DBP measurements (mm Hg) were 156/78 at the start, 140/72 at 1 month and 134/72 at 6 months. Blood pressure (BP) reductions associated with various diseases were similar among patients. Laboratory data including serum levels of total cholesterol, uric acid, hemoglobin A1c and serum potassium did not change during the study. Adverse effects such as orthostatic hypotension and considerable reductions in BP (>30 mmHg SBP) were rare.

CONCLUSIONS

Lo/HTCZ is safe and effective in reducing and improving BP control in a 'real world' setting. Treatment with Lo/HTCZ enabled a substantial proportion of hypertensive patients with associated diseases to achieve the recommended goal of <140 mm Hg.

Managing blood pressure control in Asian patients: safety and efficacy of losartan

Hypertension is common in Asian populations and is a major cause of cardiovascular diseases. The prevalence of hypertension is increasing in many Asian countries. The overall prevalence of hypertension in India and the People’s Republic of China has been estimated to be 20.6% in men and 22.6% in women. However, the rates of detection, treatment, and control of hypertension remain low in Asia. This reflects a low level of literacy and education, as well as a low level of access to medical care. To overcome these obstacles, strategies targeted at education, promotion, and optimization of medical care, are crucial to achieve target blood pressure control. Angiotensin receptor blockers are one of the first-line treatments for essential hypertension because they confer better cardiovascular outcomes. Losartan has been widely evaluated for the management of hypertension. Although some studies suggested that the blood pressure-lowering effect of losartan is perhaps lower than for other angiotensin receptor blockers, losartan has been demonstrated to be beneficial in terms of renal protection in patients with diabetes, heart failure resulting from either systolic or diastolic dysfunction, and diuretic-induced hyperuricemia. However, most of these data were obtained from Caucasian populations. The efficacy and safety of losartan in Asian populations may be different because of genetic and ethnic variations. Therefore, the efficacy and safety of losartan in Asian patients with hypertension warrant further study.

Release from glomerular overload by the addition of low-dose thiazide in patients with angiotensin receptor blocker-resistant hypertension

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This multicenter, prospective, observational study assessed the renoprotective effects of losartan/thiazide combination therapy in terms of lowering the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

METHODS

Adult patients with angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)-resistant essential hypertension (n = 104) were enrolled and switched to combination therapy with losartan (50 mg/day) and hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg/day).

RESULTS

eGFR values declined significantly during the first 3 months, and changes in eGFR were assessed according to tertiles of the eGFR decrease ratio at 3 months. Only the high eGFR decrease (1st tertile) group showed significantly greater decreases in baseline eGFR and albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) during the first 3 months. Additionally, the assessment according to tertiles of the baseline eGFR showed a signifcant decrease in eGFR and ACR during the first 3 months in the high baseline eGFR (1st tertile) group, but not in the moderate (2nd tertile) and low baseline eGFR (3rd tertile) groups.

CONCLUSION

The present results revealed that losartan/thiazide combination therapy attenuated glomerular overload, indicating that this therapy may provide glomerular protection in patients with an elevated GFR without causing prolonged damage to renal function.

A comparative study on the effectiveness of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide and telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide in patients with hypertension

PURPOSE

Long-term effects of a low-dose hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) with losartan (LOS) on uric acid (UA) metabolism as well as glucose metabolism have been studied in hypertensive patients in comparison with those of a low-dose HCTZ with telmisartan (TEL).

METHOD

Fifty-nine hypertensive patients were allocated to a combination therapy with either losartan (50 mg/day)/HCTZ (12.5 mg/day) (LOS + HCTZ group: n = 37) or telmisartan (40 mg/day)/HCTZ (12.5 mg/day) (TEL + HCTZ group: n = 22), respectively. Before and 1 year after the treatment, blood pressure and biochemical parameters of blood and urine were evaluated.

RESULTS

Both systolic and diastolic blood pressures significantly decreased in two groups, without any statistical differences among them. LOS + HCTZ caused no changes in the serum UA level or the ratio of UA clearance to creatinine clearance (CUA/Ccr), whereas TEL + HCTZ significantly increased the serum UA level and reduced CUA/Ccr. LOS + HCTZ did not influence CUA/Ccr in patients with their serum UA below 5.4 mg/dl, while LOS + HCTZ significantly increased CUA/Ccr in patients with their serum UA above 5.5 mg/dl. TEL + HCTZ significantly reduced CUA/Ccr in patients with their serum UA below and above 5.4 mg/dl to increase serum UA level significantly. Neither combination therapies caused any changes in fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c and HOMA-R. In patients with their serum UA level above 5.4 mg/dl, TEL + HCTZ increased HOMA-R, whereas LOS + HCTZ did not.

CONCLUSIONS

LOS + HCTZ did not influence UA metabolism as well as glucose metabolism, likely because of inhibitory action of losartan on URAT1, although TEL + HCTZ were accompanied with impairment of the UA metabolism and glucose metabolism.

Angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)-diuretic versus ARB-calcium channel blocker combination therapy for hypertension uncontrolled by ARB monotherapy

Diuretics or calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are used concomitantly with an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB). However, it is not established which ARB-based combination therapy is the most effective and safe. This prospective randomized open-label study compared the efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose tablet of losartan (LST)-hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) (n = 99) and LST-amlodipine (AML) (n = 77) in Japanese patients whose hypertension was uncontrolled by ARB monotherapy. Blood pressure changed similarly over the 12-month study period. Only LST-HCTZ significantly increased serum uric acid (SUA) in patients with low baseline SUA (<5.6 mg/dL) but not in patients with high baseline SUA.

Significance of estimated salt excretion as a possible predictor of the efficacy of concomitant angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and low-dose thiazide in patients with ARB resistance

The purpose of this study was to assess the factors affecting the efficacy of combination therapy with losartan and thiazide, with a focus on the significance of salt excretion, via a multicenter observational study. Adult patients with essential hypertension showing therapy resistance to angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) as a monotherapy or in combination with Ca channel blockers (CCB) were enrolled, and their previously administered ARBs were replaced with the combination tablet containing losartan (50 mg per day) and hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg per day). Blood pressure and biochemical parameters were monitored for a year. The baseline blood pressure (153.4±14.8/86.4±11.3 mm Hg) was significantly lowered at the 3rd month (137.3±17.4/78.2±11.1 mm Hg, n=93) and was maintained at this lower level until the 12th month (135.3±14.0/76.4±11.1 mm Hg, n=74). The baseline value of estimated salt excretion (eSE), calculated using Tanaka's formula, differed significantly between the high and low treatment response groups, which were defined by the average change in mean blood pressure (MBP-C, -11.3 mm Hg; eSE=10.8±2.9 g per day in high responders vs. 9.2±2.3 g per day in low responders, P=0.004). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed a significant correlation between eSE and MBP-C (R=-0.288, P=0.007) and indicated the clinical effectiveness of eSE as a possible predictor for MBP-C (P=0.021). In addition, the urine Na-to-Cr ratio (NCR) demonstrated significant correlations with eSE (R=0.848, P<0.001) and MBP-C (R=-0.344, P<0.001). These results suggest that eSE or NCR could, to a certain extent, predict the efficacy of combination therapy with losartan and low-dose thiazide in patients demonstrating ARB resistance. Combination therapy with losartan and thiazide might thus be suitable for patients with a large amount of salt excretion.

Comparison of medium-dose losartan/hydrochlorothiazide and maximal-dose angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of Japanese patients with uncontrolled hypertension: the Kobe-CONNECT Study

The objective of this study is to examine the effects of thiazide diuretics, plus medium-dose losartan versus maximal-dose angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) on blood pressure (BP) in Japanese patients with uncontrolled hypertension despite the use of medium-dose ARBs. Hypertensive patients in whom BP was inadequately controlled by treatment with medium-dose ARBs alone or with calcium-channel blockers were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to a fixed-dose combination of 50 mg per day losartan and 12.5 mg per day hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ; n=98), or to a maximal dose of current ARBs (n=95). The reduction in office BP from baseline was significantly larger in the losartan/HCTZ group than in the maximal-dose ARB group (systolic BP -22.7±13.7 vs. -11.7±13.0 mm Hg, diastolic BP -9.6±10.9 vs. -4.5±11.0 mm Hg; P<0.01, respectively). The proportion of patients in whom the therapeutic target BP was achieved was greater in the losartan/HCTZ group than in the maximal-dose ARB group (59.2 vs. 26.3%; P<0.001). Both early-morning and evening BP were controlled more effectively over 1 year of treatment in the losartan/HCTZ group than in the maximal-dose ARB group (the mean BP difference between the groups, early-morning: 5.6 mm Hg (P=0.001), evening: 3.8 mm Hg (P=0.049)). Adverse changes in serum potassium and uric acid were observed in the losartan/HCTZ group; however, both changes were very slight, and the values were still within the normal range. The concomitant usage of losartan and HCTZ had no influence on glucose metabolism and lipid profiles. Declines in plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels and urinary albumin excretion were observed in the losartan/HCTZ group, but not in the maximal-dose ARB group. Switching from medium-dose ARBs to losartan plus HCTZ reduced both office and home BP efficiently in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Efficacy and tolerability of initial therapy with single-pill combination telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide 80/25 mg in patients with grade 2 or 3 hypertension: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with grade 2 or 3 hypertension may require high-dose combination therapy to achieve blood pressure (BP) targets in a timely manner.

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the effectiveness and tolerability of a single-pill combination (SPC) of telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide 80/25 mg (T80/H25) with T80 monotherapy.

METHODS

In a Phase IV, multinational, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-group trial, 894 patients with mean seated trough cuff systolic BP [SBP] ≥160 mm Hg and diastolic BP [DBP] ≥100 mm Hg were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive T40/H12.5 SPC or telmisartan 40 mg monotherapy for 1 week before the dose was uptitrated to T80/H25 SPC or T80, respectively, administered for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline in mean seated cuff trough SBP. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 888 patients received treatment (294 and 594 patients in the T80/H25 and T80 groups, respectively) (mean age, 57.0 years; age ≥65 years, 25.7%; male, 53.8%; white, 68.0%); 61 patients prematurely discontinued. Mean baseline SBP/DBP values were 172.3/104.3 mm Hg (T80/H25) and 173.3/104.5 mm Hg (T80). After 7 weeks, SBP was changed by -37.0 and -28.5 mm Hg in the T80/H25 and T80 groups (P < 0.0001); DBP was changed by -18.6 and -15.4 mm Hg respectively (P < 0.0001). These differences were significant after 2 weeks at the higher dosage (P < 0.0001). BP target (SBP/DBP <140/<90 mm Hg) was achieved in 55.5% and 34.7% of patients in the T80/H25 and T80 groups (P < 0.0001). T80/H25 SPC and T80 had a similar frequency of overall AEs (16.0% vs 17.0%). The prevalences of treatment-related AEs with T80/H25 SPC and T80 were low (4.6% and 2.8%), as were the rates of AEs that led to discontinuation (1.0% and 2.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

In these patients with grade 2 or 3 hypertension, initial therapy with T80/H25 was associated with a significantly greater reduction in mean seated cuff trough SBP compared with T80 alone, as well as with improved hypertension goal attainment rates. Both treatments appeared to be well tolerated.

Three-year safety and effectiveness of fixed-dose losartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in Japanese patients with hypertension under clinical setting (PALM-1 Extension Study)

Concerns about metabolic complications often disturb prolonged use of diuretics in Japan. We investigated 3-year safety and efficacy in Japanese patients with hypertension who were uncontrolled with angiotensin receptor blocker or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor regimens and then switched to losartan (50 mg)/hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg; HCTZ) combinations. Blood pressure decreased favorably and maintained a steady state for 3 years (157 ± 16/88 ± 11 mm Hg to 132 ± 13/75 ± 9 mm Hg, P < .0001). Metabolic parameters maintained a limited range of changes after 3 years, and adverse events were markedly decreased after 1-year treatment. The losartan/HCTZ combination minimized diuretic-related adverse effects and thus may be useful for the treatment of Japanese patients with hypertension.

Long-term antihypertensive efficacy of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy on home blood pressure control

Angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combination therapy has been shown to produce a prompt reduction in clinic blood pressure (BP) without serious adverse effects; however, long-term antihypertensive efficacy on home BP has not been fully investigated. In this open-label multicenter observational study, a total of 151 hypertensive patients uncontrolled with antihypertensive regimens including standard dose of ARBs were switched to the fixed-dose combination of losartan (50 mg)/HCTZ (12.5 mg) (mean age 66.9 ± 9.5 years, 51% male, 19% with diabetes mellitus, and 57% with dyslipidemia). After 3 months, losartan/HCTZ treatment significantly reduced mean home systolic BP/diastolic BP from a baseline level of 153 ± 11/85 ± 9 mm Hg to 136 ± 12/77 ± 10 mm Hg (P < .001) and mean clinic BP from 158 ± 9/87 ± 9 to 136 ± 12/77 ± 10 (P < .001), which were maintained through the study period of 12 months (132 ± 11/75 ± 9 and 136 ± 12/77 ± 10; home and clinic BP at 12 months, respectively, P < .001). Furthermore, younger patients (< 65 years) receiving ARB monotherapy at the start of the study showed a significantly greater reduction in home BP, but not in clinic BP, compared with elderly patients (≥ 65 years). In conclusion, losartan/HCTZ combination therapy exerted a 1-year long-term efficacy on home BP as well as clinic BP. In patients uncontrolled with ARB monotherapy, the antihypertensive efficacy on home BP is more pronounced in younger patients compared with that in elderly patients.

Antihypertensive effect of a fixed-dose combination of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide in patients with uncontrolled hypertension: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Achieving adequate blood pressure (BP) control often requires more than one antihypertensive agent. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a fixed-dose formulation of losartan (LOS) plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) (LOS/HCTZ) is effective in achieving a greater BP lowering in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

METHODS

The study was a prospective, multicenter, observational trial exploring the antihypertensive effect of a single tablet of LOS 50 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg. A total of 228 patients whose BP had previously been treated with more than one antihypertensive agents without having achieved BP goal below 130/80 mmHg enrolled in the study.

RESULTS

A significant decrease in systolic and diastolic BP was observed in both clinic and home measurement after switching from the previous treatment to LOS/HCTZ. There was a significant decrease in both B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and urinary albumin creatinine (Cr) excretion ratio (ACR), especially in patients with elevated values. In contrast, there was a significant increase in serum Cr concentration in conjunction with a decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Overall serum uric acid (UA) concentration increased, whereas in patients with hyperuricemia there was a significant reduction in this value.

CONCLUSION

Switching to LOS/HCTZ provides a greater reduction in clinic and home BP in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. This combination therapy may lead to cardio-, reno protection and improve UA metabolism.

Effects of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide on serum uric acid levels and blood pressure in hypertensive patients

The effect of a mixed formulation of 50 mg losartan (LOS) and 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) on blood pressure and the uric acid metabolism was analyzed in 73 patients who switched to this formulation from other antihypertensive drugs. Eight patients who switched to the formulation from the regular dose of renin-angiotensin (RA) inhibitor (angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB] or angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor) only showed a significant decrease in blood pressure, from 156.9 ± 14.1/88.6 ± 9.7 mmHg to 128.3 ± 16.0/76.1 ±10.7 mmHg (p = 0.007), and a significant increase in serum uric acid levels, from 5.2 ± 1.1 mg/dL to 6.8 ± 0.7 mg/dL (p = 0.02). In the other 50 patients who switched from a combination of the regular dose of RA inhibitor and calcium channel blocker (CCB), their blood pressure significantly increased, from 126.0 ± 13.8/72.0 ± 10.0 mmHg to 132.5 ± 16.4/76.5 ± 11.3 mmHg (p = 0.02), and their serum uric acid levels also significantly increased, from 5.6 ± 1.1 mg/dL to 6.1 ± 1.3 mg/dL (p = 0.0002). Considering that guidelines recommend using antihypertensive therapies that do not lead to an increase in serum uric acid levels, we conclude that using the ARB/HCTZ combination is less suitable than the regular dose of the ARB/CCB combination due to its effect on hypertension and serum uric acid levels.

Antihypertensive efficacy of the losartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination and its effect on plasma B-type natriuretic peptide in hypertensive patients uncontrolled by angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist-based therapy: a multicentre prospective observational study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although strict blood pressure (BP) control is effective in the prevention of cardiovascular events, it is often insufficient in many hypertensive patients. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) has been shown to be associated with cardiovascular events. We investigated the effects of the losartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination on BP and plasma BNP in hypertensive patients uncontrolled by an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist (angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB])-based therapy.

METHODS

In a multicentre prospective observational study, we enrolled 185 patients aged 36-79 years (mean age 63.8 years) with essential hypertension but without symptoms of heart failure who received an ARB-based therapy for ≥3 months but failed to achieve a target BP recommended by the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH). ARBs were switched to losartan (LOS) 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg. The antihypertensive efficacy, safety, and effects of this combination on blood biochemical parameters and plasma BNP were evaluated for 12 months.

RESULTS

Mean ± SD systolic and diastolic BP decreased from 152 ± 13/87 ± 10 mmHg to 128 ± 14/74 ± 10 mmHg, respectively, after 12 months (p < 0.001). Mean ± SD plasma BNP levels decreased significantly from 46.0 ± 83.0 pg/mL to 40.8 ± 68.0 pg/mL (p < 0.05). The percentage of patients who achieved the JSH 2004 target BP was 51% after 12 months; the percentage was 63% in elderly patients aged ≥65 years without complications, and 43% in patients with concomitant diabetes mellitus or chronic kidney disease. No association was found between a decrease in plasma BNP levels and BP, age, body mass index or estimated glomerular filtration rate. There was a significant increase in serum uric acid and a decrease in serum potassium, but both were within the range of normal values. Adverse events were observed in 8.6% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Antihypertensive treatment using two types of drugs (LOS/HCTZ) with different mechanisms yielded potent antihypertensive efficacy with safety and decreased plasma BNP levels.

Effects of combined antihypertensive therapy with losartan/hydrochlorothiazide on uric acid metabolism

OBJECTIVE

The Jikei Optimal Antihypertensive Treatment (JOINT) study originally evaluated the effect of a fixed-dose formulation of losartan (LOS) (50 mg) plus 12.5 hydrochrolthiazide (HCTZ) for achieving better blood pressure (BP) control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. This study is a sub-analysis of the JOINT study, focusing on the effect of LOS/HCTZ on the uric acid (UA) metabolism.

METHODS

Among 228 participants in the JOINT study, a total of 164 patients whose blood and urinary UA specimens were available were included in the present analyses.

RESULTS

Six months after switching from the prior antihypertensive agent(s) to a single tablet formulation of LOS/HCTZ, the overall serum UA concentration (sUA) increased from 6.0 ± 1.6 mg/dL to 6.2 ± 1.6 mg/dL (p=0.029). The urinary UA/creatinine (Cr) ratio increased from 0.45 +/- 0.21 to 0.50 +/- 0.25 (p=0.014), and the fractional excretion of UA (FEUA) also increased, from 7.1 +/- 3.6 to 7.0 +/- 4.3, p=0.04). Multivariate regression analyses of the basal parameters showed the change in sUA (ΔUA) to correlate with the basal sUA (β=-0.483, p<0.001), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (β=-0.202, p=0.007) and systolic BP (β=0.147, p=0.038). In addition, the ΔUA also correlated with the changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (ΔeGFR) (β=-0.332, p<0.001). When the patients were classified into two groups depending on their basal sUA, those with a basal sUA ≥ 7 mg/dL exhibited a decrease in their sUA, whereas the rest of those with a sUA <7 mg/dL experienced an increase. Furthermore, patients who had previously been treated with LOS alone had a greater increase in the sUA than those treated with an angiotensin II blocker (ARB) other than LOS alone.

CONCLUSION

Antihypertensive therapy with a single tablet formulation of LOS/HCTZ is considered to be a useful option for controlling both BP and sUA, especially in uncontrolled hypertensive patients with hyperuricemia.