The combination of amlodipine and angiotensin receptor blocker or diuretics in high-risk hypertensive patients: rationale, design and baseline characteristics

Long-term amlodipine-based combination therapy attenuates seasonal variation of blood pressure in hypertensive patients

Objectives: This study was to investigate whether long-term amlodipine-based combination therapy attenuates seasonal variation of office blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients. Methods: The data of 206 patients recruited in the Nanchang site of CHIEF trial were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received an amlodipine-based therapy for three years after reaching target BP with a 12-week titration treatment. Among them, 106 patients received amlodipine plus amiloride/hydrochlorothiazide (AA group) and 100 received amlodipine plus telmisartan (AT group) therapies. These patients were followed up every three months . The difference between the highest and lowest values of outdoor temperature in each three months was calculated as the seasonal temperature difference (T-d) and seasonal BP difference was calculated in the similar way. BP control rates in each season were calculated. Results: In the three years, the highest SBP and DBP values occurred in winter and the lowest values in summer. As a result, the BP control rate in summer was the highest and that in winter was the lowest, especially for SBP. Although T-d levels were similar during three following-up years, the seasonal SBP/DBP differences in 2011 were significantly lower than 2009 (10.03 ± 5.74/6.96 ± 3.72 vs 14.36 ± 8.19/9.78 ± 5.21 mmHg, P < .05), suggesting seasonal variation in BP was obviously reduced. Meanwhile, similar change was observed in AA and AT groups. Conclusions: Besides lower BP effectively, long-term amlodipine-based combination therapy could alleviate the seasonal BP variation in high-risk hypertensive patients.

Pharmacological treatment of hypertension in people without prior cerebrovascular disease for the prevention of cognitive impairment and dementia

BACKGROUND

This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2006 (McGuinness 2006), and previously updated in 2009 (McGuinness 2009). Hypertension is a risk factor for dementia. Observational studies suggest antihypertensive treatment is associated with lower incidences of cognitive impairment and dementia. There is already clear evidence to support the treatment of hypertension after stroke.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether pharmacological treatment of hypertension can prevent cognitive impairment or dementia in people who have no history of cerebrovascular disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Specialised Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases, as well as many trials registries and grey literature sources, most recently on 7 July 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which pharmacological interventions to treat hypertension were given for at least 12 months. We excluded trials of pharmacological interventions to lower blood pressure in non-hypertensive participants. We also excluded trials conducted solely in people with stroke.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. We collected information regarding incidence of dementia, cognitive decline, change in blood pressure, adverse effects and quality of life. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 12 studies, totaling 30,412 participants, in this review. Eight studies compared active treatment with placebo. Of the four non-placebo-controlled studies, two compared intensive versus standard blood pressure reduction. The two final included studies compared different classes of antihypertensive drug. Study durations varied from one to five years. The combined result of four placebo-controlled trials that reported incident dementia indicated no evidence of a difference in the risk of dementia between the antihypertensive treatment group and the placebo group (236/7767 versus 259/7660, odds ratio (OR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 1.09; very low certainty evidence, downgraded due to study limitations and indirectness). The combined results from five placebo-controlled trials that reported change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) may indicate a modest benefit from antihypertensive treatment (mean difference (MD) 0.20, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.29; very low certainty evidence, downgraded due to study limitations, indirectness and imprecision). The certainty of evidence for both cognitive outcomes was downgraded on the basis of study limitations and indirectness. Study durations were too short, overall, to expect a significant difference in dementia rates between groups. Dementia and cognitive decline were secondary outcomes for most studies. Additional sources of bias include: the use of antihypertensive medication by the placebo group in the placebo-controlled trials; failure to reach recruitment targets; and early termination of studies on safety grounds. Meta-analysis of the placebo-controlled trials reporting results found a mean change in systolic blood pressure of -9.25 mmHg (95% CI -9.73, -8.78) between treatment (n = 8973) and placebo (n = 8820) groups, and a mean change in diastolic blood pressure of -2.47 mmHg (95% CI -2.70, -2.24) between treatment (n = 7700) and placebo (n = 7509) groups (both low certainty evidence downgraded on the basis of study limitations and inconsistency). Three trials - SHEP 1991, LOMIR MCT IL 1996 and MRC 1996 - reported more withdrawals due to adverse events in active treatment groups than placebo groups. Participants on active treatment in Syst Eur 1998 were less likely to discontinue treatment due to side effects, and participants on active treatment in HYVET 2008 reported fewer 'serious adverse events' than in the placebo group. There was no evidence of a difference in withdrawals rates between groups in SCOPE 2003, and results were unclear for Perez Stable 2000 and Zhang 2018. Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Five of the placebo-controlled trials provided quality of life (QOL) data. Heterogeneity again precluded meta-analysis. SHEP 1991, Syst Eur 1998 and HYVET 2008 reported no evidence of a difference in QOL measures between active treatment and placebo groups over time. The SCOPE 2003 sub-study (Degl'Innocenti 2004) showed a smaller drop in QOL measures in the active treatment compared to the placebo group. LOMIR MCT IL 1996 reported an improvement in a QOL measure at twelve months in one active treatment group and deterioration in another.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

High certainty randomised controlled trial evidence regarding the effect of hypertension treatment on dementia and cognitive decline does not yet exist. The studies included in this review provide low certainty evidence (downgraded primarily due to study limitations and indirectness) that pharmacological treatment of hypertension, in people without prior cerebrovascular disease, leads to less cognitive decline compared to controls. This difference is below the level considered clinically significant. The studies included in this review also provide very low certainty evidence that pharmacological treatment of hypertension, in people without prior cerebrovascular disease, prevents dementia.

Health-related quality of life in blood pressure control and blood lipid-lowering therapies: results from the CHIEF randomized controlled trial

Our study aimed to explore changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) during blood pressure control and blood lipid-lowering therapies. We conducted a 2 × 2 factorial-designed randomized controlled trial in 180 clinical centers in China. At baseline, participants were randomly assigned to an amlodipine + amiloride/hydrochlorothiazide group or an amlodipine + telmisartan group for the blood pressure control treatment and to a statin group or a routine intervention group for the blood lipid-lowering treatment. The allocation ratio was 1:1 for both treatments. Follow-up lasted for 4 years. HRQoL was assessed using the EuroQol five dimensions three levels (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire every year. Of 13,542 hypertensive patients enrolled in the clinical trial, 9885 were eligible for the analysis. The problems for all dimensions of the EQ-5D-3L descriptive system were slight at baseline and were well preserved in the follow-up period. The EuroQol visual analog scale (EQ VAS) score and the EQ-5D-3L index improved over time (P_trend < 0.001), with improvements similar among interventions but different between patients who reached the treatment targets or not. Decreases in systolic/diastolic blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were independently correlated with increases in the EQ VAS score and the EQ-5D-3L index. In conclusion, HRQoL is associated with blood pressure/lipid levels but not with specific antihypertensive or lipid-lowering interventions. Blood pressure control and blood lipid-lowering therapies should not be denied to Chinese patients in consideration of their negative effects on quality of life.

Reducing Visit-To-Visit Variability in Systolic Blood Pressure for Improving the Progression of Carotid Atherosclerosis and Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients with Hypertension Management

BACKGROUND

Visit-to-visit variability (VVV) in blood pressure (BP) creates challenges to hypertension control and was independent associated with increased all-cause mortality in hypertensive patients. The major goal of the present study was to investigate the association of VVV in systolic (S)BP with progression of carotid atherosclerosis and en-dothelial dysfunction in on-treated hypertensive patients.

METHODS

Overall, 356 hypertensive patients were enrolled and completed the trial. Clinic BP was measured at baseline and at 3 monthly thereafter. Carotid artery ultrasound and endothelial function were evaluated at baseline and annually follow-up visit. VVV in BP was assessed by standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of serial follow-up BP measurements. The patients were divided into low, middle, and high group by tertile of SD in SBP.

RESULTS

Decrease percentage of maximum intima-media thickness (IMT) and stiffness index β and increase percentage of brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and nitric oxide (NO) in lower groups were significant greater than in higher groups (P < 0.05). Change percentage of stiffness index β and endothelin-1 positively, and change percentage of FMD and NO negatively correlated with SD, CV, maximum, and delta of SBP (P < 0.05). SD and CV of SBP were risk factors for change percentage of IMT, stiffness index β, FMD, NO, and endothelin-1 independently of other influential factors, such as age, and mean SBP.

CONCLUSION

Excessive VVV in SBP maybe increase carotid atherosclerosis and impair endothelial function in on-treated hypertensive patients. Reducing VVV in SBP is benefit for patients with hypertension management.

Visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure: correlated with the changes of arterial stiffness and myocardial perfusion in on-treated hypertensive patients

BACKGROUND

Visit-to-visit variability in blood pressure (BP) was demonstrated to correlate with cardiovascular events independent of mean BP. The goal of the present study was to investigate the correlation of visit-to-visit BP variability with artery stiffness and myocardial perfusion in on-treated hypertensive patients.

METHODS

BP was measured in 271 hypertensive patients at every visit over the course of the antihypertensive treatment, and the standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), maximum, and minimum in serial BP were calculated. Non-invasive pulse wave analysis was performed in all patients.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), aortic augmentation index (Aix) and Aix adjusted to a "standard heart rate" of 75 beats/min (Aix@HR75) were markedly declined, and sub-endocardial viability ratio (SEVR) was obviously increased in each group (p < 0.001). The changes of cfPWV, SEVR, Aix and Aix@HR75 in patients with lower SD of systolic blood pressure (SBP) were significantly greater than those in patients with higher SD of SBP. And the changes were statistically correlated with both SD and CV of serial SBP during follow-up, even after adjusted for mean SBP and mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP).

CONCLUSION

Visit-to-visit SBP variability is independently correlated with changes of artery stiffness and myocardial perfusion in on-treated hypertensive patients.

Long-term safety and efficacy of telmisartan/amlodipine single pill combination in the treatment of hypertension

The use of multiple drug regimens is increasingly recognized as a tacit requirement for the management of hypertension, a necessity fueled in part by rising rates of metabolic syndrome and diabetes. By targeting complementary pathways, combinations of antihypertensive drugs can be applied to provide effective blood pressure control while minimizing side effects and reducing exposure to high doses of individual medications. In addition, combination therapies, including angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and calcium channel blockers (CCBs), have the added benefit of reducing cardiovascular mortality and morbidity over other dual therapies while providing equivalent blood pressure control. It is possible that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), which unlike ACE inhibitors are minimally affected by upregulation of alternative pathways for angiotensin II accumulation following long-term treatment, would also provide such outcome benefits. At issue, however, is maintaining patient compliance, as adding medications is known to reduce adherence to treatment regimens. The purpose of this review is to summarize existing trial data for the long-term safety and efficacy of a recent addition to the armamentarium of dual-antihypertensive therapeutic options, the telmisartan/amlodipine single pill combination. The areas where long-term data are lacking, notably clinical information regarding minorities and women, will also be discussed.

Telmisartan plus amlodipine single-pill combination for the management of hypertensive patients with a metabolic risk profile (added-risk patients)

OBJECTIVE

Hypertensive patients with metabolic risk factors, including obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome, often require a combination of antihypertensive agents to achieve blood pressure (BP) targets. This article considers the evidence supporting telmisartan/amlodipine combination therapy for the treatment of hypertension in patients with metabolic risk factors.

METHODS

Clinical trials of telmisartan/amlodipine at doses of 40-80 mg/5-10 mg (T40-80/A5-10) in free, fixed-dose and single-pill combinations were identified through electronic searches (MEDLINE and congress abstracts) up to and including June 2012, and from the Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) trial database. All identified trials were reviewed for data on hypertensive patients with obesity, diabetes, or both. Post-hoc subgroup analyses were carried out using the BI database to determine the relevant information if it was not previously reported.

RESULTS

Thirteen clinical trials including 6886 patients were identified with data relevant for inclusion in this review. The telmisartan/amlodipine combination allowed a high proportion of hypertensive patients with metabolic conditions to achieve BP targets, particularly among patients who had previously failed to achieve BP targets with monotherapy. BP reductions and goal rate achievement were similarly high among patients with and without the presence of metabolic risk factors. BP reductions were maintained throughout the 24 h dosing period, and 24 h goal rates were obtained in a high proportion of patients. Particularly large reductions in BP with telmisartan/amlodipine were recorded among patients with severe hypertension (systolic BP ≥180 mmHg).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this post-hoc analysis further support the ability of the telmisartan/amlodipine combination to effectively reduce BP in hypertensive patients with obesity, diabetes, or metabolic syndrome, enabling the majority of patients to achieve target BP. This combination is also well tolerated, and may be considered a suitable option for these added-risk hypertensive patients.

Are fixed-dose combination antihypertensives suitable as first-line therapy?

OBJECTIVE

To contemplate how initial antihypertensive therapy with fixed-dose combinations (FDC) might be incorporated into clinical practice, based on a compilation of evidence comparing FDCs with monotherapy and loose-dose combinations in varying patient populations.

METHODS

A non-systematic search of PubMed (from 2007 to 2012) was performed for randomized, controlled trials in order to capture the evidence on FDC versus monotherapy and loose-dose combinations as first-line therapy. The literature search focused on calcium channel blocker (CCB)-renin angiotensin system (RAS) blocker combinations. Additionally, any relevant papers known to the authors were included. International recommendations from published hypertension treatment guidelines were also consulted.

RESULTS

The results of this literature review identified two emergent issues. Firstly, there is a discord between antihypertensive use and actual blood pressure (BP) control achieved - despite an increase in the use of antihypertensives over the last 10 years, BP control rates remain low. Secondly, a greater association between BP and cardiovascular risk in Asians may magnify this discrepancy. A number of international guidelines are recommending early combination therapy, such as CCB-RAS blocker combinations in the majority of patients based on the available evidence, with such combinations showing benefits in terms of compliance, BP lowering and control, and safety. Additionally, recent studies have indicated that improved BP control may be achieved with simplified guidelines and the use of FDCs. Overall, these findings indicate that FDC could be used as first-line.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this literature review suggest that physicians may need to readdress their approach to antihypertensive treatment. Earlier use of antihypertensive FDC (including first-line) may help to shrink the current gap between antihypertensive use and BP target control achieved. Most guidelines acknowledge that combination therapy is required in the majority of patients, and FDC are regarded as a suitable alternative, having demonstrated better compliance compared with loose-dose combinations.

A 48-week study of amlodipine plus amiloride / hydrochlorothiazide vs. amlodipine plus telmisartan in the treatment of hypertension

Background:  Chinese Hypertension Intervention Efficacy (CHIEF) study is a large-scale randomised clinical trial across China, which compares the efficacy of two combination regimens in reducing cardiovascular events associated with hypertension. Methods:  We reported the 48-week efficacy and tolerability of the two antihypertensive regimens in participants from Shandong Province, China. Eligible patients aged 50-79 years were randomised to receive amlodipine plus amiloride/hydrochlorothiazide (Group A) or amlodipine plus telmisartan (Group B). The doses of both regimens were titrated and other antihypertensive agents were added subsequently to achieve a blood pressure (BP) goal (<140/90 mmHg for general population, <130/80 mmHg for diabetics and <150/90 mmHg for elderly). Efficacy variables included the changes of BP, control rates (the proportion of patients achieving a BP goal), and response rates (the proportion of patients achieving a BP goal or a reduction of BP ≥20/10 mmHg). Safety was assessed by monitoring the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Results:  Of the 349 patients enrolled, 314 were randomised and 291 completed the study (141 in Group A and 150 in Group B). At week 48, the BP was reduced by 28.77/15.55 mmHg in Group A and by 31.38/16.07 mmHg in Group B (p > 0.05 for comparisons between Group A and Group B). The control rates (71.79% vs. 77.22%; p = 0.270) and response rates (79.49% vs. 84.81%; p = 0.218) were also similar. For both regimens, the control rates in diabetic patients were relatively lower (31.91% and 32.50%), while those in elderly patients were pretty higher (90.74% and 97.62%). AEs were mild to moderate in severity (17.95% vs. 12.66%, p = 0.193). Conclusion:  Both combination regimens, amlodipine plus amiloride/hydrochlorothiazide and amlodipine plus telmisartan, were effective and safe for the high-risk hypertensive patients.

Novel diallyldisulfide analogs ameliorate cardiovascular remodeling in rats with L-NAME-induced hypertension

Diallyldisulfide (DADS), an active principle of garlic (Allium sativum) is known for its antihypertensive properties. The present study was designed to evaluate the effect of novel DADS analogs, against L-NAME induced hypertension in Wistar rats. The daily administration of L-NAME (50mg/kg) for six weeks along with DADS analogs (20 mg/kg) significantly decreased the elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) and the activity of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and also inhibited the decline in nitrite/nitrate (NO(x)) concentrations and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) levels. Adverse changes such as lipid peroxidation, protein damage and a decrease in the levels of antioxidant enzymes, were rectified after the administration of DADS analogs. Oral administration of DADS analogs preserved the expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS). The ability of the DADS analogs to inhibit L-NAME induced hypertension was compared with Enalapril (15 mg/kg), which was taken as a standard. The DADS analogs prevented L-NAME-induced cardio toxicity, which was also reflected at the microscopic level indicative of its cardio protective effects. DADS analogs induced vasorelaxation was completely abolished by the removal of the endothelium or by pre-treatment with L-NAME, an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase. DADS analogs inhibited the calcium influx induced by phenylephrine (0.3 μM) and high K(+) (60mM) and this effect was completely abolished by pretreatment of L-NAME. Taken together, our results show that the DADS analogs induce vasorelaxation and have antihypertensive properties, which may be mediated through activation of eNOS.

Single-pill telmisartan and amlodipine: a rational combination for the treatment of hypertension

Despite the well documented benefits conferred by adequate control of hypertension, the majority of hypertensive patients display suboptimal control and few patients achieve blood pressure (BP) levels <140/90 mmHg. As a consequence, combination therapy will be required in the majority of patients to achieve target BP. Fixed-dose combinations of antihypertensives not only simplify treatment regimens, contributing to enhanced patient adherence, they provide superior BP-lowering efficacy and an improved tolerability profile. Fixed-dose combinations have become the strategy of choice in high-risk patients or those with stage 2-3 hypertension. The combination of a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) with a calcium channel blocker (CCB) is a first-line combination that, in addition to its antihypertensive efficacy, reduces oedema, the main adverse effect of the dihydropyridine CCB and the main factor limiting their use. In morbidity/mortality studies, this fixed-dose combination has also demonstrated superiority over a RASI combined with a diuretic. The single-pill combination of telmisartan and amlodipine has been shown to produce a dose-dependent BP-lowering effect significantly greater than that of either agent administered as monotherapy. These findings have been confirmed by ambulatory BP monitoring in patients with stage 1 and 2 hypertension, which demonstrated that single-pill telmisartan/amlodipine provides substantial 24-hour BP-lowering efficacy. A higher proportion of patients achieved 24-hour BP goals of <130/80 mm Hg on combination therapy. The superior efficacy of combination therapy has been demonstrated across a broad range of patients, including those with moderate-to-severe hypertension, diabetes mellitus and obesity. Moreover, combined use of telmisartan and amlodipine reduces the incidence of amlodipine-induced oedema, making it a preferred combination for the treatment of hypertension.