Patients with resistant hypertension have more peripheral arterial disease than other uncontrolled hypertensives

Relationship between the prognostic nutritional index and resistant hypertension in patients with essential hypertension

OBJECTIVES

Immune system activation plays a role in resistant hypertension (RHTN) pathogenesis. The clinical effect of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) on patients with RHTN remains unclear. The aim of this study investigated the possible correlation between PNI and RHTN.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 180 adult subjects. In patients were classified into three groups according to their office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM): RHTN (n = 60), controlled hypertension (CHTN, n = 60), and normotension-control (NT-C, n = 60). RHTN was defined as BP ≥140/90 mm Hg while taking ≥3 antihypertensive medications or BP <140/90 mm Hg while taking ≥4 medications. The PNI was calculated from the 10 x serum albumin (g/dL) + 0.005 x total lymphocyte count (/μL) formula.

RESULTS

Office and ABPM were significantly higher in patients with RHTN. Patients in the RHTN (46.1 ± 5.3) had significantly lower PNI than that in the CHTN (54.9 ± 6.7) (P = .032), and PNIs of both hypertensive groups were significantly lower than the NT-C group (P = .019, for both). The ROC curve analysis performed to assess the predictive value of PNI for RHTN and using 50.9 optimal cutoff value of PNI for RHTN gave a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 68.5% (AUC = 0.73, 95% CI 0.69-0.96).Multivariate analysis indicated diabetes, 24-h ABPM SBP, CRP, pill burden, and PNI (<51.6) as independent predictors of RHTN.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the level of PNI was significantly lower in patients with RHTN compared to patients with CHTN. PNI is independently related to RHTN.

Time trends in the risk of atrial fibrillation and ischaemic stroke in patients with peripheral artery disease between 1997 and 2015

Objective

The risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) is an important issue that has not been investigated adequately. Our aim with the present study was to explore trends in the incidence of AF and stroke in patients with PAD.

Methods

We employed Danish nationwide registers to identify all patients with first-time diagnosis of PAD (aged ≥18 years) between 1997 and 2015. Age-standardised incidence rates per 1 000 person-years were calculated to estimate trends of AF and stroke. Risk of AF and stroke was estimated by 1 year cumulative incidence.

Results

A total of 121.241 patients with first-time diagnosis of PAD were identified. The 1-year cumulative incidence of AF in patients with PAD were 1.97% for year 1997–2000, 2.63% for year 2001–2005, 2.66% for year 2006–2010 and 2.78% for year 2011–2015, respectively. The 1-year cumulative incidence of stroke in patients with PAD were 2.71%, 2.71%, 1.95% and 1.81%, for the 1997–2000, 2001–2005, 2006–2010 and 2011–2015 year groups, respectively. Likewise, the age-standardised incidence rates showed increasing trends of AF during the study period, whereas trends of stroke demonstrated a decline. During study, the initiation of cholesterol-lowering agents and clopidogrel increased markedly from 7.0% to 51.3% and 0.1% to 5.9%, whereas use of warfarin slightly dropped from 4.29% to 3.21%.

Conclusions

The incidence of AF in patients with PAD has significantly increased over time, whereas a marked decline has occurred in the incidence of stroke. This may suggest that the secondary prevention strategies aimed at reducing risk of stroke are broadly effective.

Prehypertension is associated with peripheral arterial disease and low ankle-brachial index

Patients with prehypertension suffer endothelial dysfunction and are at increased cardiovascular risk. Ankle-brachial index (ABI) constitutes an efficient tool for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease; but also an ABI < 0.9 is an independent and positive predictor of endothelial dysfunction and is associated with increased cardiovascular risk and mortality.

The aim

of this study was testing whether ABI was decreased in prehypertensive patients when compared with normotensive subjects.

Methods

We included 70 prehypertensive patients older than 19 years, in whom the ABI was registered with a 5 megahertz Doppler (Summit Doppler L250, Life Dop., USA). The highest ankle systolic pressure was divided by the highest brachial systolic pressure. We also included 70 normotensive subjects in whom the ABI was registered in the same way. The measurements were performed by the same physician who was blinded about the study.

Statistical analysis was performed with odds ratio and student t-test.

Results

The ABI values in normotensive subjects were 1.023 ± 0.21, whereas prehypertensive patients significantly had lower ABI (0.90 ± 0.14p = 0.00012).

We found ABI <0.9 in 30 prehypertensive patients (42.85%) and 13 normotensive patients (18.5%). The odds ratio of ABI <0.90 in prehypertensive patients was 3.288 (IC₉₅ 1.5–7.0, p = 0.0023).

A regression analysis failed to show any independent association between ABI values and any other clinical parameter.

Conclusions

Prehypertensive patients had lower ABI and higher prevalence of peripheral artery disease when compared with normotensive subjects; this fact increases their cardiovascular risk. ABI must be included in global evaluation of prehypertensive subjects.