High prevalence of a rare hepatitis C virus in patients treated in the same hemodialysis unit: evidence for nosocomial transmission of HCV

Updated Evidence on the Epidemiology of Hepatitis C Virus in Hemodialysis

Prevalence rates of HCV infection are decreasing in hemodialysis units of most developed countries; however, nosocomial transmission of HCV continues to occur in the hemodialysis setting, not only in the emerging world. According to the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS, 2012–2015), the prevalence of HCV among patients on regular hemodialysis was 9.9%; in incident patients, the frequency of HCV was approximately 5%. Outbreaks of HCV have been investigated by epidemiologic and phylogenetic data obtained by sequencing of the HCV genome; no single factor was retrieved as being associated with nosocomial transmission of HCV within hemodialysis units. Transmission of HCV within HD units can be prevented successfully by full compliance with infection control practices; also, antiviral treatment and serologic screening for anti-HCV can be useful in achieving this aim. Infection control practices in hemodialysis units include barrier precautions to prevent exposure to blood-borne pathogens and other procedures specific to the hemodialysis environment. Isolating HCV-infected hemodialysis patients or using dedicated dialysis machines for HCV-infected patients are not currently recommended; reuse of dialyzers of HCV-infected patients should be made, according to recent guidelines. Randomized controlled trials regarding the impact of isolation on the risk of transmission of HCV to hemodialysis patients have not been published to date. At least two studies showed complete elimination of de novo HCV within HD units by implementation of strict infection control practices without isolation practices. De novo HCV within hemodialysis units has been independently associated with facility HCV prevalence, dialysis vintage, and low staff-to-patient ratio. Antiviral treatment of HCV-infected patients on hemodialysis should not replace the implementation of barrier precautions and other routine hemodialysis unit procedures.

Prevention of Nosocomial Transmission of Hepatitis C Infection in a Hemodialysis Unit. A Prospective Study

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in hemodialysis patients can be transmitted by transfusions and nosocomially. A high prevalence of HCV infection, over 50%, was demonstrated in our hemodialysis (HD) unit. In order to prevent the nosocomial spread of HCV infection in the HD unit a prospective study was begun separating anti-HCV positive patients from the negative ones. A total of 170 patients (83 anti-HCV positive) started this study in September 1994 and were followed for 4 years. A separate room and dedicated equipment were assigned to anti-HCV positive and anti-HCV negative patients. Of those 170 patients there were 15 hepatitis B virus (HBV) positive patients, 5 of whom were anti-HCV positive, who were treated in a separate room on dialysis equipment for anti-HCV positive or negative patients. Application of general precautions, as recommended by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), was reinforced. During the first 12 weeks after implementing the precautions seven more anti-HCV positive patients were detected, and by December 1995 another two HCV infected patients were found. The follow-up included all changes in HD population treated until the end of 1998. The incidence of seroconversion to HCV was 12.9% in 1995, 7.1% in 1996, 5.0% in 1997, and 6.6% in 1998. The higher incidence of seroconversion in September to November 1994 was probably due to the nosocomial infection being in the incubation period at the time of isolation.

This prospective study in a large HD unit with a high prevalence of HCV infection demonstrates a relatively successful prevention of HCV spread. Procedure-related transmission of HCV in hemodialysis could be prevented by rigorous application of universal precautions as recommended by the CDC. As a second line of prevention, in highly burdened dialysis centers, segregation of HCV positive patients can help control nosocomial transmission.

Transmission of hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis: Current concepts

A variety of epidemiological data provides evidence for the occurrence of nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection to hemodialysis (HD) patients. The most important factor implicated in HCV transmission between patients treated in the same dialysis unit is cross-contamination from supplies and surfaces as a result of failure of staff to follow infection control procedures. Parts of the HCV genome are highly variable and lend themselves to fingerprinting of each isolate using nucleic acid testing (NAT) and sequencing. This approach has permitted investigation of possible transmission routes within HD units. A systematic review of molecular virology papers revealed transmission of HCV via internal fluid pathways of the dialysis machines in a minority of reports only. Dialyzer reuse was not identified as a risk factor for HCV acquisition in multicenter databases. No randomized controlled trials exist on the impact of isolation on the risk of transmission of HCV to hemodialysis patients. A Belgian prospective multicenter study showed a reduction from 1.4% to 0% in the annual incidence of seroconversion for HCV without any isolation measures, by implementation of strict infection control procedures designed to prevent transmission of blood-borne pathogens, including HCV. However, an isolation policy for HCV-infected dialysis patients should be considered in dialysis units where nosocomial transmission of HCV persists despite reinforcement and audit of hygienic precautions for hemodialysis. Routine audit precautions (general and for dialysis machines) are recommended on a regular basis within HD units.

Risk factors of HCV seroconversion in hemodialysis patients in tabriz, iran

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a significant health concern in patients with end-stage renal disease under dialysis. Epidemiological studies have reported a prevalence rate of 5.5-55.9% for this condition in Iran.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the risk factors for HCV infection and seroconversion in hemodialysis patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 455 hemodialysis patients from each of the five dialysis units in Tabriz, northwest Iran. Possible risk factors for HCV infection and seroconversion were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients were HCV positive (8.1% of the study population) and seroconversion occurred in 18 of them during the dialysis treatment (3.95% of the study population). History of renal transplantation (44.4%, P < 0.0001), surgical intervention (except for renal transplantation and AV fistula placement) (94.4%, P = 0.03), and mean duration of dialysis (106.06 ± 55.519, P < 0.0001) had strong statistically significant associations with the seroconversion.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study indicates increased risk for HCV infection in patients under dialysis and its relation with the mean duration of hemodialysis, history of renal transplantation and surgical intervention. Considering the immune deficiency in these patients, intense education to both patients and medical staff will be beneficial.

Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Haemodialysis Patients: "Wolf in Sheep's Clothing"

BACKGROUND

170 million people are infected with the Hepatitis C virus (HCV) around the world. Approximately 50%-70% patients infected with HCV develop chronic liver disease. Haemodialysis patients constitute an especially important group with high HCV prevalence. Outbreaks of HCV infection in dialysis units have been documented. Detection of anti-HCV antibodies is a convenient and conventional mode of documentation. However, in this group, it has it's own caveats.

METHODS

48 patients who had undergone or were on haemodialysis (HD) and had undergone a minimum of 15 dialysis sittings were studied. HCV infection was documented both by anti-HCV antibody detection and HCV RNA testing. A comparative evaluation of results by both tests was done.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 48 patients, HCV RNA was detected in 38 (79.16%) and anti-HCV antibodies in 13(27.07%). Out of 48 patients 10(20.83%) were negative for both parameters. 22.91% (11/48) of patients were positive for both HCV RNA and anti-HCV antibody. 56.25% (27/48) were HCV RNA positive but anti-HCV antibodies were not detectable in their sera. 2 patients (04.16%) had a positive anti-HCV antibody status despite HCV RNA being negative. In 20.83% (10/48) both parameters were undetectable.

CONCLUSION

Chronic liver disease (CLD), particularly due to HCV infection, is a major complication amongst haemodialysis (HD) patients. Without reliable assays for antigenemia and the inability of antibody tests to define viremia in all cases, the detection of viral nucleic acid is necessary for diagnosis of active HCV infection.

Low-dose peginterferon alfa-2a is safe and produces a sustained virologic response in patients with chronic hepatitis C and end-stage renal disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Chronic hepatitis C increases mortality of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Ribavirin is not recommended for patients with renal dysfunction; peginterferon monotherapy is the most appropriate treatment for chronic hepatitis C in such patients. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of 2 dosages of peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kDa) in patients with chronic hepatitis C and ESRD on hemodialysis.

METHODS

We performed a randomized, multicenter, open-label clinical study of 85 patients with chronic hepatitis C and ESRD who were receiving hemodialysis at specialist outpatient hepatology clinics. Patients were treated with subcutaneous peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kDa) at dosages of 135 or 90 μg/wk for 48 weeks.

RESULTS

The incidences of overall sustained virologic responses (SVRs) (undetectable hepatitis C virus [HCV] RNA [<50 IU/mL] after 24 weeks of untreated follow-up) were 39.5% (15/38) in the 135 μg/wk group and 34.9% (15/43) in the 90 μg/wk group (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-3.06; P = .67). Among patients with undetectable HCV RNA at week 12, 60.9% (14/23) of those in the 135 μg/wk group and 87.5% (14/16) of those in the 90 μg/wk group achieved an SVR. Therapy was well-tolerated with no new safety concerns. The most common adverse events (>10% of patients in at least 1 treatment group) included conditions associated with ESRD (anemia and hypertension) and with interferon treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Forty-eight weeks of treatment with low-dose peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kDa) is safe and produces an SVR in 35%-40% of patients with chronic hepatitis C and ESRD on hemodialysis.

Hepatitis C virus screening and clinical monitoring of biomarkers in patients undergoing hemodialysis

In this study, 395 volunteers were enrolled to investigate the seroprevalence of hepatitis C virus, the immunological and the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) biomarkers amongst hemodialysis patients, living in Manaus, Brazil. An overall seroprevalence of 13.9% was found in the hemodialysis patients. Analysis of seroconversion patterns demonstrated that most patients with HCV seroconverted up to 10 years following the first hemodialysis session. Anti-NS5 antibody was detectable in 60.4% of patients with HCV. A lower percentage of circulating CD3(+) and CD4(+) T-cells was found in patients seronegative for HCV, whereas a higher frequency of CD8(+) T-cells was the hallmark of patients with HCV. An overall low activation state of monocytes and eosinophils were observed in hemodialysis patients. In contrast, a higher frequency of activated neutrophils was observed in patients with HCV, selectively in the NS5+ subgroup. All hemodialysis patients had a higher percentage of activated lymphocytes, with the higher activation state in patients with NS5- reactivity. Higher ALT levels were observed in patients with HCV, especially in the NS5+ subgroup. Interestingly, the ALT levels were correlated negatively with the lymphocyte activation state, selectively in the NS5- subgroup, suggesting a protective role of these activated lymphocytes in patients with HCV. These findings reinforce the importance of the transmission of HCV among hemodialysis patients, suggesting that apart from the HCV screening, the serological and ALT biomarkers may represent important predictors of morbidity and/or mortality among patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Is single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis of the full 5' untranslated region an adequate approach to study hepatitis C virus quasispecies distribution?

Single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis is used by many laboratories to study the quasispecies distribution of the hepatitis C virus (HCV). Here we question the validity of this experimental approach, as conclusions are drawn from the analysis of the migration patterns of two ssDNA molecules and not from RNA. Using previously characterized mutants of the HCV 5' untranslated regions, we show that contrary to what has been predicted, SSCP migration patterns of DNA amplicons with differences in their nucleotide sequences generated from the full 5' UTR of HCV are not necessarily unique.

[Chronic viral hepatitis and kidney failure]

Chronic viral hepatitis remains a major problem among patients with chronic renal failure. Hepatitis B and C viruses are frequent among dialysis patients and after renal transplantation and may significantly diminish the survival of both the patient and the graft. Hepatitis B and C viral infection in these patients is often characterized by normal transaminase levels despite viremia and progressive liver lesions. Liver biopsy remains essential for assessing the extent of liver disease. Cirrhosis is a contraindication to transplantation of only a kidney, because of elevated morbidity and mortality. A combined as liver-kidney transplantation may be considered. The best treatment of hepatitis infections is preventive: vaccination against the hepatitis B virus and attentive hygiene, especially to prevent nosocomial transmission. Among patients not awaiting transplant, antiviral treatment should be reserved for patients with active or even fibrotic liver disease. For hemodialysis patients awaiting kidney transplant: Alpha interferon is ineffective and poorly tolerated by dialysis patients. Lamivudine is effective and well tolerated, but its long-term efficacy and its optimal effective dose in dialysis patients remain unknown.

Clinical and laboratory characteristics of acute hepatitis C in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis are a risk group for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The characteristics of acute hepatitis C infection in this population are not well known.

GOALS

To evaluate the clinical and laboratory characteristics of acute hepatitis C in ESRD patients treated with hemodialysis.

STUDY

ESRD patients on hemodialysis with acute hepatitis C, characterized by elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) followed by anti-HCV seroconversion were studied.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (58% females, 44+/-12 y), with a mean time on hemodialysis of 2 years, were included. Only 2 (6%) patients had jaundice. ALT elevation was observed in all patients. Median peak ALT was 4.7 x upper limit of normal. The median interval between ALT elevation and anti-HCV seroconversion was 1 month (0 to 8). None of the patients with detectable HCV-RNA showed spontaneous clearance of viremia within 12 weeks of follow-up. Three (8%) patients presented ALT elevation followed by anti-HCV seroconversion with undetectable HCV-RNA.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute hepatitis C is frequently asymptomatic in ESRD patients on hemodialysis and should be suspected in all patients presenting elevated ALT. Determination of HCV-RNA is important for the confirmation of infection. Anti-HCV seroconversion seems to occur early and spontaneous clearance of HCV-RNA is uncommon.

Acute hepatitis C in patients receiving hemodialysis

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is frequent in patients with end-stage renal disease treated by chronic dialysis, with a prevalence varying from 10-65% according to the geographical data. The prevalence is significantly associated with the duration of dialysis and the number of transfused blood products[1,2] and has dramatically declined with efficient blood screening.[3] We studied patients with acute HCV infection in a dialysis unit. The diagnosis was based on both anti-HCV detection and HCV-RNA detection. Other virological tools including HCV genotype determination was also used to tailor treatment to the individual patient and determine its efficacy for a one-year follow-up period. Seventeen patients (7 male and 10 female, mean age: 63.7 +/- 11.6 SD) with acute hepatitis C were enrolled to our study. All of them were followed up for a period of one year after the diagnosis was established. Phylogenetic analysis distinguished two separate HCV subtypes 1b, which were both responsible for this acute infection (see Figure 1). These types did not differ in their behavior on the clinical situation of our patients, as confirmed by the fact that in both groups of patients, there was only one patient who presented with acute illness. Six patients of our study group, three months after the acute infection, received pegylated interferon (Peg-IFNa2a) 135 mug for a six-month period. Four of them responded very well to therapy and at the first determination HCV RNA was below the cutoff point. One of our patients with very high HCV levels (HCV RNA > 50,000,000 IU/mL), despite receiving the same therapy, did not respond well and developed cirrhosis. In conclusion, it is clear from our experience that better information is needed about the current incidence, prevalence, and risk factors for HCV infection in dialysis patients. Algorithms for the diagnosis and management of hepatitis C should be developed by academic societies. Routine screening for hepatitis C also would allow for better definition of the natural history of hepatitis C in patients with end stage renal disease. [image omitted]Figure 1. NS 5B gene phylogenetic tree analysis of the acute hepatitis C epidemic.

Infection by the hepatitis C virus in chronic renal failure patients undergoing hemodialysis in Mato Grosso state, central Brazil: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a significant problem for patients undergoing hemodialysis therapy. This situation has never been studied in Mato Grosso state, central Brazil. This study was conducted aiming to estimate the prevalence of the anti-HCV and the incidence of seroconversion in the main metropolitan region of the state.

METHODS

433 patients from the six hemodialysis units were interviewed and anti-HCV was tested by a third-generation enzyme immunoassay. An open cohort of patients who tested negative for anti-HCV at the entry of the study was created and seroconversions was assessed monthly. The staff responsible for the units were interviewed to assess whether the infection control measures were being followed. Logistic and Cox regression analysis were performed in order to assess risk factor to HCV.

RESULTS

The entry on the study took place between January 2002 and June 2005. 73 out of 433 (16.9%, CI 95%: 13.3-20.8) was found to be anti-HCV reactive. The multivariate analysis indicated as risk factors associated to anti-HCV the duration of the hemodialysis treatment, the number of transfusions received, and the unit of treatment. An open cohort of 360 patients who tested negative for anti-HCV was created, with a following average of 24 (+/- 15) months. Forty seroconversions were recorded corresponding to an incidence density of 4.6/1000 patient-months, ranges 0 to 30 among the units. Cox regression indicated the time of hemodialysis (RR = 2.2; CI 95%: 1.1-4.6; p < 0.05) and the unit where treatment was performed (RR = 42.4; CI 95%: 9.9-180.5; p < 0.05) as risk factors for seroconversion. The three units with highest anti-HCV prevalence and incidence were identified as those that more frequently failed to apply control measures.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated high prevalence and incidence of anti-HCV in some of the hemodialysis units. Time on hemodialysis therapy was an independent factor associated to HCV. Blood transfusion was associated with anti-HCV in initial survey but was not important in incident cases. Failure of applying control measures was more evident in units with the highest HCV prevalence and incidence. The results suggest that nosocomial transmission was the main spread factor of HCV in the studied population.

Surveillance of infection control procedures in dialysis units in Japan: a preliminary study

As there is a high risk of indirect and direct transmission of infectious agents in chronic hemodialysis, infection control procedures should be established in dialysis units. This paper presents the findings of a questionnaire designed to survey the current status of infection control procedures in hemodialysis settings. Two hundred and forty-three hemodialysis units in Japan were surveyed. Nearly 90% of hemodialysis units reported compliance with each procedure recommended by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States, including use of disposable gloves, handling of non-disposable or non-single-use items, and routine serological testing of blood-borne viruses. However, more than 50% of units reported that they did not comply with recommendations concerning some procedures, such as places for preparing medications and their delivery, clean areas in the units, vaccination for hepatitis B, and additional measures for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs-Ag) positive patients. Especially, the concept of universal precautions seemed to be misunderstood in units with a high prevalence of anti-hepatitis C antibody-positive (anti-HCV Ab-positive) patients. In conclusion, further intensive education and training will be necessary to establish infection control procedures.

[Prevalence of hepatitis C, hepatitis B and HIV infection among haemodialysis patients in Ibn-Rochd university hospital, Casablanca]

The viral infections are frequent in haemodialysis patients, notably those due to the hepatitis C virus (HCV), the hepatitis B virus (HBV) and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of the hepatitis C, the hepatitis B, the HIV infection in haemodialysis patients and the main risk factors for hepatitis C in the chronic haemodialysis patients treated in haemodialysis unit of Ibn Rochd University Hospital in Casablanca. This retrospective study was performed in 186 chronic haemodialysis patients and showed a high prevalence of HVC infection (76%), the prevalence of HBV infection was at 2%, none of the patients had detectable antibodies of HIV. Among the patients infected by the HCV, the mean duration of dialysis was 8,7 years. The mean number of blood units transfused was 16,5. Seventeen patients (11%) had no history of blood transfusion. In conclusion, the blood transfusion is not considered to be a like a major risk factor of the HCV infection in haemodialysis patients and this since the systematic detection of the anti-HCV antibodies in the blood donors. The nosocomial transmission of HCV seems to be the main risk factor HCV infection in the haemodialysis units requiring a strict adherence to infection control procedures for prevention of HVC infection in haemodialysis patients.

De novo HCV infection among dialysis patients: a prospective study by HCV core antigen ELISA assay

BACKGROUND

Dialysis patients remain a high-risk group for hepatitis C virus infection. The current diagnosis of hepatitis C virus in dialysis patients includes serological measurement of anti-hepatitis C virus antibody; however, nucleic acid amplification technology for assessing hepatitis C virus viraemia is commonly used in other populations. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test for detecting antibody to hepatitis C nucleocapsid core antigen (hepatitis C virus core antigen) in human serum has been recently developed (hepatitis C virus Core Antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test). It is conceived for screening of donor blood products to significantly reduce the 'serologic window' occurring before seroconversion during acute hepatitis C virus.

AIM AND METHODS

A cohort (n = 72) of patients on maintenance haemodialysis in a single unit in the years 2000-2003 was included. Study patients were tested monthly by hepatitis C virus Core Antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in a prospective, clinical trial. Routine results obtained by hepatitis C virus Core Antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test were confirmed by assessing hepatitis C virus viraemia by branched-chain DNA (bDNA) signal amplification assay.

RESULTS

De novo hepatitis C virus infection was identified in three patients during the study period; the hepatitis C virus incidence was 1.38% (95% confidence intervals, 1.31-4.09) per year. In each patient, hepatitis C virus core antigen testing allowed the serological identification of acute hepatitis C virus before anti-hepatitis C virus seroconversion. Hepatitis C virus RNA testing confirmed the results obtained by hepatitis C virus Core Antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in all cases. The time from initial hepatitis C virus detection by hepatitis C virus Core Antigen Assay and anti-hepatitis C virus seroconversion was not greater than four weeks. Two (67%) of three patients with de novo hepatitis C virus acquisition were HBsAg negative; both these patients underwent an initial phase of hepatitis C virus viraemia that was associated with an increase in alanine aminotransferase activity and preceded the seroconversion to anti-hepatitis C virus antibody. Nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus between haemodialysis patients was implicated in at least two (67%) of these three patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Serological testing for hepatitis C virus core antigen can identify acute hepatitis C virus infection before anti-hepatitis C virus seroconversion. The time from initial hepatitis C virus detection by hepatitis C virus core antigen assay and anti-hepatitis C virus seroconversion was not >4 weeks. De novo acquisition of hepatitis C virus in haemodialysis was associated with a rise in alanine aminotransferase levels. Hepatitis C virus core antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test results can be obtained in routine laboratories without the need of special equipment or training. Hepatitis C virus core antigen testing among anti-hepatitis C virus negative patients on maintenance dialysis is suggested in order to early assess de novo hepatitis C virus within dialysis units.

Nosocomial transmission of HCV in the liver unit of a tertiary care center

Despite its medical and legal implications, there are no prospective studies analyzing the incidence and mechanisms involved in the nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in liver units. This study prospectively investigates the nosocomial transmission of HCV in the liver unit of a tertiary care center from August 2000 to October 2002. The median prevalence of HCV infection among hospitalized patients was 50%. Anti-HCV-negative patients admitted to the liver unit during the study period were prospectively followed, and serum markers of HCV infection were repeated 6 months after discharge. All known risk factors for HCV transmission (including the physical allocation of HCV-infected and noninfected patients during hospitalization) were recorded. Complete follow-up data were available in 1301 (84.5%) of 1540 patients. Six patients (0.46%) acquired HCV infection (annual incidence: 0.27/100 admissions). Phylogenetic analyses of recovered HCV sequences identified the source of infection as an HCV-infected roommate (3 cases) and a patient receiving care by the same nurse team (1 case). The most relevant risk factors associated with HCV acquisition were duration of hospitalization (>10 days; OR, 35; 95% CI, 1.96-622) and hospitalization with an HCV-infected roommate (>5 days; OR, 12; 95% CI, 1.39-103). In fact, HCV infection occurred in 1.7% of the 357 patients hospitalized longer than 10 days. In conclusion, HCV nosocomial infection appears to occur via patient-to-patient transmission in liver units, particularly in individuals who require long hospitalizations. Continuous reinforcement of universal prevention measures and, when possible, isolation of patients at higher risk might further reduce nosocomial HCV transmission.

[High prevalence and incidence of hepatitis C virus infections among dialysis patients in the East-Centre of Tunisia]

Hemodialysed patients are recognised as a group at increased risk of infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV). The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and incidence of HCV infection among dialysis patients of the east-centre part of Tunisia. Two hundred and seventy-six patients dialysed until 2001 were recruited within seven hemodialysis units located in the cities of Sousse, Monastir and Mahdia. The serum markers of HCV infection were tested over the period of March 2000-December 2002, by a 3rd generation ELISA test for antibodies and by qualitative RT-PCR technique for viral RNA. The prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies and of HCV RNA was 32.6% (90 patients) and 25.7% (71 patients), respectively. Between 1998 and 2002, 20 new infections were documented in five of the seven dialysis units corresponding to an incidence of 2.34% per year, with an average time of contamination after the beginning of dialysis of 4.6 years. If all the infections are assessed to have occurred during dialysis, the density of incidence of HCV contamination was 4.4% per year of dialysis. A high correlation was noticed between the presence of HCV markers in serum and the duration of dialysis (F = 34.15, P < 0.0001). In the absence of other risk factors (transfusion, drug-addiction), these results plead for the nosocomial transmission of the observed HCV infections. A phylogenetic analysis of the E2 hypervariable region of the viral genome is in progress to confirm this assumption.

Evaluation of a prototype HCV NS5b assay for typing strains of hepatitis C virus isolated from Tunisian haemodialysis patients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) strains isolated from 68 haemodialysis Tunisian patients exhibiting chronic infection were genotyped targeting the NS5b region of the HCV genome using a prototype assay developed by Bayer HealthCare-Diagnostics (TRUGENE NS5b HCV). The overall results were compared to those obtained with another assay of the same company based on sequencing of the 5' non-coding region (TRUGENE HCV 5'NC genotyping kit). All strains could be typed by the 5'NC typing kit, but only 62 (91; 2%) by the NS5b prototype assay. All the 62 strains typed by both methods exhibited the same pattern at the type level: 57 were type 1, 3 were type 2, and 2 were type 4. At the subtype level, eight strains that gave undetermined results by the 5'NC kit were successfully typed by the NS5b kit; eight additional strains exhibited discrepant results. The overall agreement between the two assays was 74.2% at the subtype level. In conclusion, the NS5b region appears to be much more accurate than the 5'NC region to subtype HCV strains, especially in those isolated from patients attending haemodialysis centres where the subtype distribution suggests frequent nosocomial transmissions.

Contamination by hepatitis B and C viruses in the dialysis setting

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis virus infections continue to be a major concern in the dialysis setting. We studied levels of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA contamination in dialysis units to better define the role of the dialysis environment and machines in the nosocomial transmission of hepatitis viruses.

METHODS

Possible contamination by hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HCV was studied by collecting environmental samples in 3 dialysis units located in Rome, Italy. Samples and controls were tested for HBsAg by a microparticle enzyme immunoassay, and for HCV RNA, by qualitative transcription-mediated amplification assay.

RESULTS

HCV RNA and HBsAg were detected in 1 of 64 (1.6%) and 1 of 64 samples (1.6%), respectively. The only HCV RNA-positive sample was found in 1 dialysis unit on the external surface of the dialysate (inlet-outlet) connector of a dialysis machine used for HCV-negative patients. The only HBsAg-positive sample was found in another dialysis unit on the internal surface of the blood pressure monitor cuff of a dialysis bed dedicated for HBsAg-positive patients.

CONCLUSION

A segregation policy for HBsAg-positive patients is a necessary measure despite its high cost-effectiveness; we found HBsAg contamination in the segregated HBV-infected room. Conversely, the finding of HCV RNA contamination on a dialysis machine not dedicated to HCV-positive patients suggests that isolation of HCV-infected dialysis patients and use of dedicated machines are unjustified. Major attention should be given to strict adherence to infection control measures in the dialysis setting.

Changes in viremia and circulating interferon-alpha during hemodialysis in hepatitis C virus-positive patients: only coincidental phenomena?

BACKGROUND

It has been hypothesized that hemodialysis (HD) treatment per se can preserve patients from an aggressive course of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection by reduction of viral load. The aim of the present study in HCV-positive (HCV+) HD patients is to determine whether HD induces the production of interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) and if such production can contribute to viremia reduction.

METHODS

To address this issue, HCV RNA and IFN-alpha levels were determined in 11 HCV+ patients immediately before and at the end of a 4-hour dialysis session using cellulosic membranes and 24 and 48 hours later, ie, immediately before the subsequent dialysis session using the same membrane and at the end of the dialysis session. The same protocol was repeated 1 week later using a high-biocompatibility synthetic membrane.

RESULTS

HCV titer decreased in all patients after dialysis (range, 3% to 95%; P = 0.001) and thereafter progressively increased and returned to basal levels within 48 hours, with a new reduction during the next dialysis treatment. There was no significant difference in the magnitude of changes in HCV titers in tests performed using cellulosic or synthetic membranes. Plasma IFN-alpha levels increased markedly after dialysis using both cellulosic (in 9 of 11 cases) and synthetic membranes (in 10 of 11 cases; P < 0.01) and returned to basal levels within 48 hours; thereafter, IFN-alpha levels increased again during the next dialysis session. In some patients, plasma IFN-alpha levels after HD were approximately 50% of the level observed after therapeutic administration of 6 million units of IFN-alpha to 4 HD patients with chronic hepatitis.

CONCLUSION

Although without a proven direct cause-effect relationship between HCV level reduction and induction of IFN-alpha after dialysis, our observation suggests an additional new mechanism for the unusually mild course of HCV infection in HD patients.

Changing molecular epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection in Northeast Italy

To assess HCV genotype distribution and its determinants, 318 consecutive HCV RNA positive patients were examined. Subtype 1b infection was the most prevalent (35.5%), followed by subtype 1a (22%), 3a (21.4%) and 2 genotype (21.3%). Subtypes 1a, 1b and 3a had a comparable prevalence (30-35%) in the 0-15-, 16-30- and 31-45-year age groups. In subjects older than 45 years, genotype 2 prevalence increased, whereas subtype 1a and 3a infections decreased markedly. In this age group types 1b and 2 accounted for a prevalence of more than 90% in a comparable proportion. Genotype prevalence rates according to different risk factors were different statistically (P < 0.001): subtype 1a and 3a infections were predominant in injection drug users (42.9% and 37.7%, respectively), whereas community acquired infections and infections in patients with a history of transfusion were caused mainly by subtype 1b (38.5% and 66.6%, respectively). Logistic regression showed that age and injection drug use are independent determinants of genotype distribution.

Use of phylogenetic analysis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) hypervariable region 1 sequences to trace an outbreak of HCV in an autodialysis unit

Hemodialysis patients are at high risk of infection by hepatitis C virus (HCV). The aim of this study was to investigate an HCV outbreak that occurred in an autodialysis unit by using epidemiological and molecular methods. Seroconversion to HCV antibody (anti-HCV) was observed in two patients over an 18-month period; two other patients had previously been recorded as anti-HCV positive. All four patients involved in the outbreak were tested for HCV RNA, and hepatitis C genotype determination was accomplished by a reverse hybridization assay. Furthermore, part of hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) of the hepatitis C genome was amplified and sequenced in samples from all HCV RNA-positive patients. Phylogenetic analysis of the nucleotide sequences obtained was carried out in order to investigate any possible epidemiological linkages among patients. The nucleotide sequences of the HVR1 regions of both newly infected patients were found to be identical to sequences of samples from previously recorded anti-HCV-positive original patients, suggesting that they were infected by the same isolate. Molecular and epidemiological analysis suggested that nosocomial patient-to-patient transmission was the most likely explanation for the virus spread in the autodialysis unit under study.

Severe evolution of chronic hepatitis C in renal transplantation: a case control study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the impact of kidney transplantation on histopathological progression of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, 28 HCV-positive renal transplant patients, who underwent two sequential liver biopsies with a mean of 7.1+/-4.0 years, were compared with 28 matched immunocompetent controls.

RESULTS

According to the Metavir score, the initial and final activity scores (from 0 to 3) increased from 0.2+/-0.4 to 1.4+/-1.1 (P<0.001) and those of fibrosis (from 0 to 4) from 0.5+/-0.5 to 2.0+/-1.4 (P<0.001) in the transplanted group, respectively, whereas the respective differences were not significant in the control group. The yearly progression rate of activity and fibrosis was significantly higher in the renal transplant group as compared with the immunocompetent group: 0.26+/-0.41 vs 0.01+/-0.19 (P<0.01) and 0.26+/-0.35 vs 0.05+/-0.21 (P<0.03), respectively. Twenty (71.5%) and 14 (50.0%) of the renal allograft recipients had activity and fibrosis progression as compared with four (16%) (P<0.001) and four (16%) (P<0.01) in immunocompetent patients; six kidney recipients (21.4%) evolved to cirrhosis vs only one in the control group (3.6%) (P=0.07). Liver-related mortality was significantly higher during the follow-up period in renal transplant patients than in the control group (10 vs 0%) (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Using conventional immunosuppressive regimen, renal transplantation is associated with a more severe evolution of chronic hepatitis C as compared with HCV-infected immunocompetent subjects. Thus, the histopathological evaluation should be performed and anti-viral therapy discussed before renal transplantation.

Hepatitis C. Epidemiologic quandaries

Although many aspects of the transmission of HCV have been clarified, some important issues remain controversial, and the conventional wisdom may be based more on opinion than data (Table 2). HCV is transmitted by percutaneous exposure to contaminated blood, uncommonly from a mother to her infant and between sexual partners, and rarely during the provision of medical care in developed nations. Improved behavioral research instruments are needed to further the understanding of the practices that actually transmit infection. In addition, large, prospective studies are necessary to characterize the frequency [table: see text] of transmission between sexual partners and the potential role of cesarian section in reducing HCV transmission to infants.

Hepatitis C prevalence and risk factors in hemodialysis patients in Central Brazil: a survey by polymerase chain reaction and serological methods

An hemodialysis population in Central Brazil was screened by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and serological methods to assess the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and to investigate associated risk factors. All hemodialysis patients (n=428) were interviewed in eight dialysis units in Goiânia city. Blood samples were collected and serum samples screened for anti-HCV antibodies by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Positive samples were retested for confirmation with a line immunoassay (LIA). All samples were also tested for HCV RNA by the PCR. An overall prevalence of 46.7% (CI 95%: 42-51.5) was found, ranging from 20.7% (CI 95%: 8.8-38.1) to 90.4% (CI 95%: 79.9-96.4) depending on the dialysis unit. Of the 428 patients, 185 were found to be seropositive by ELISA, and 167 were confirmed positive by LIA, resulting in an anti-HCV prevalence of 39%. A total of 131 patients were HCV RNA-positive. HCV viremia was present in 63.5% of the anti-HCV-positive patients and in 10.3% of the anti-HCV-negative patients. Univariate analysis of risk factors showed that the number of previous blood transfusions, transfusion of blood before mandatory screening for anti-HCV, length of time on hemodialysis, and treatment in multiple units were associated with HCV positivity. However, multivariate analysis revealed that blood transfusion before screening for anti-HCV and length of time on hemodialysis were significantly associated with HCV infection in this population. These data suggest that nosocomial transmission may play a role in the spread of HCV in the dialysis units studied. In addition to anti-HCV screening, HCV RNA detection is necessary for the diagnosis of HCV infection in hemodialysis patients.

Investigating hepatitis C virus heterogeneity in a high prevalence setting using heteroduplex tracking analysis

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is very common among chronic hemodialysis patients. In the past, blood transfusion appeared to be the primary risk factor; however evidence of nosocomial HCV transmission in the hemodialysis setting has recently been reported. This report describes a molecular investigation of HCV isolates obtained from a population of 670 patients attending six different Seattle-King County based hemodialysis centers in order to identify potential common source infections. 733 serum specimens were collected from hemodialysis patients in 1992 and 1996, and were tested for HCV antibodies and RNA. Overall, 115 of 670 (17%) patients were positive for HCV RNA, and thus were considered actively infected by HCV. HCV genotype was determined in all cases by restriction fragment length polymorphism, and 93 patients were found to be infected by HCV genotype 1. HCV envelope genes were amplified from the 93 patients with genotype 1 infection, and were studied in further detail by heteroduplex tracking analysis (HTA) using genotype 1a and 1b specific probes derived from the envelope 1 (E1) and envelope 2 (E2) genes. Genetic relatedness between pairs of HCV envelope genes was estimated by calculating the degree of gel shift relative to homoduplex controls. Nucleotide sequencing and phylogenetic analysis was used to confirm genetic relatedness detected by HTA. When HTA was performed using the E1 gene probe, 12 apparently related infections were detected; 10 of 12 (83%) of these infections were confirmed as truly related using the gold standard method of nucleotide sequencing plus phylogenetic analysis. Using an E2 gene probe, 24 infections were apparently related, but only six (25%) were confirmed by sequencing. As a control, 41 envelope genes, which were unrelated by HTA, were sequenced; 0 of 41 (0%) were truly related. In summary, HTA provides a rapid and effective molecular technique for screening HCV genetic relatedness in population-based studies, and should prove valuable in future studies of HCV molecular epidemiology.

Prevalence of infected patients and understaffing have a role in hepatitis C virus transmission in dialysis

To assess hepatitis C virus (HCV) incidence rates and identify determinants of infection among hemodialysis patients, a multicenter study was conducted in 58 units in ITALY: An initial seroprevalence survey was conducted among 3,492 patients already on hemodialysis therapy as of January 1997 and among an additional 434 patients who began dialysis up to January 1998. HCV antibodies were assessed by third-generation enzyme immunoassays. Patients testing seronegative at baseline were enrolled into a 1-year incidence study with serological follow-up at 6 and 12 months. For patients who seroconverted, an HCV RNA assay was performed on stored baseline samples to confirm new infection. A nested case-control study was subsequently performed to investigate potential risk factors. For each incident case, three controls negative for both HCV antibodies and HCV RNA were randomly selected. At enrollment, HCV seroprevalence was 30.0%. During follow-up, 23 new HCV cases were documented, with a cumulative incidence of 9.5 cases/1,000 patient-years. By logistic regression analysis, an increased risk for HCV infection emerged for patients attending the dialysis units with a high prevalence of HCV-infected patients at baseline (odds ratio [OR], 4.6) and for those attending units with a low personnel-patient ratio (OR, 5.4). Among extradialysis factors, a history of surgical intervention in the previous 6 months (OR, 16.7) significantly increased HCV risk. These findings suggest that the combination of understaffing and a high level of infected patients in the dialysis setting increases the risk for HCV nosocomial transmission. This is likely related to an increased likelihood for breaks in infection control measures.

Phylogenetic investigation for the risk of hepatitis C virus transmission to surgical and dental patients

Blood loss during treatment carries a potential risk for the transmission of blood-borne pathogens in hospital patients. To determine whether nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) occurs in surgical wards and dental hospitals, we tested anti-HCV antibodies and HCV RNA in sera from these patients and analysed the hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) sequence of HCV phylogenetically in the HCV RNA-positive patients. Five of 83 patients from a surgical ward were positive for HCV RNA, and six patients from one dental hospital and nine patients from a second were found to be positive for HCV RNA during the examination period. The HVR1 sequences were amplified from these patients' serum, and after subcloning, multiple clones of the HVR1 sequence from each patient were determined. The phylogenetic analysis of these sequences showed that HVR1 species from each patient could be classified into one to three genetic clusters of HVR1 quasi-species and that these clusters were independent of each other among patients. Thus, there was no evidence of HCV transmission in our study, and unrecognized transmission of HCV may be a rare event in surgical and dental patients at university hospitals.

Recommendations for the outpatient surveillance of renal transplant recipients. American Society of Transplantation

Many complications after renal transplantation can be prevented if they are detected early. Guidelines have been developed for the prevention of diseases in the general population, but there are no comprehensive guidelines for the prevention of diseases and complications after renal transplantation. Therefore, the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Transplantation developed these guidelines to help physicians and other health care workers provide optimal care for renal transplant recipients. The guidelines are also intended to indirectly help patients receive the access to care that they need to ensure long-term allograft survival, by attempting to systematically define what that care encompasses. The guidelines are applicable to all adult and pediatric renal transplant recipients, and they cover the outpatient screening for and prevention of diseases and complications that commonly occur after renal transplantation. They do not cover the diagnosis and treatment of diseases and complications after they become manifest, and they do not cover the pretransplant evaluation of renal transplant candidates. The guidelines are comprehensive, but they do not pretend to cover every aspect of care. As much as possible, the guidelines are evidence-based, and each recommendation has been given a subjective grade to indicate the strength of evidence that supports the recommendation. It is hoped that these guidelines will provide a framework for additional discussion and research that will improve the care of renal transplant recipients.

Phylogenetic evidence, by multiple clone analysis of hypervariable region 1, for the transmission of hepatitis C virus to chronic haemodialysis patients

We analysed hepatitis C virus (HCV) sequences to determine whether nosocomial transmission of HCV occurred in a haemodialysis unit. Twenty patients positive for serum HCV RNA were investigated. All were undergoing haemodialysis therapy in the same room. The hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) sequence of HCV was amplified and multiple clones sequenced. Phylogenetic analysis of these sequences revealed five genetic clusters consisting of HCV isolates from 11 of the 20 patients. In addition to two genetic clusters of HCV isolates from the four currently seroconverting patients and another patient who had been persistently infected, we identified three other phylogenetic relationships in HCV isolates from six patients. The patients grouped into the same cluster received haemodialysis individually on the same shift and/or side-by-side. Phylogenetic analysis of HCV HVR1 sequences corroborated the patient-to-patient HCV transmission suggested by an epidemiological study and that unrecognized transmission of HCV occurs in the dialysis room. Our multiple clone analysis of HCV isolates provides detailed information on nosocomial transmission of HCV. Transmission occurs more frequently when treatment is performed at the same time than in consoles located close to each other.

Occasional infection of hepatitis C virus occurring in haemodialysis units identified by serial monitoring of the virus infection

To examine whether hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection still occurs in haemodialysis units even after a decrease in the number of blood transfusions and in those contaminated with HCV, we tested anti-HCV antibodies and HCV RNA in 142 patients from Japanese haemodialysis units, and examined the serial prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies in 86 patients from 1992 to 1997. A high prevalence of HCV infection was observed: 34 (23.9%) and 38 (26.8%) of the 142 patients were positive for serum anti-HCV antibodies and HCV RNA, respectively. These positive rates were related to the duration of haemodialysis. We found that five patients treated in the same unit seroconverted from 1993 to 1995. Four of the five patients had been treated at the same shift and were affected at the same time. Phylogenetic analysis of the hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) sequence of HCV from serum of these patients showed that three of the four patients' sequences were phylogenetically clustered and that two of the three were closely related. Thus, an occasional transmission of HCV occurred in the haemodialysis unit. The universal precautions by staff such as carefully changing gloves may be important in inhibiting spread of HCV because no instances of infection have been seen since the instigation of educational measures for unit staff.

Molecular epidemiology of an outbreak of HCV in a hemodialysis unit: direct sequencing of HCV-HVR1 as an appropriate tool for phylogenetic analysis

Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is still a serious problem in hemodialysis patients, despite screening of blood products for anti-HCV antibodies. The prevalence of HCV in HD patients is between 15% and 30% in Germany. We report the molecular epidemiology of an HCV outbreak in a hemodialysis unit in 1997 is determined. HCV hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) was amplified from serum samples of 19 patients by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequenced directly. In addition, HCV isolates from 3 of these 19 patients were cloned and sequenced. 14 newly infected patients and two patients, who had been infected for several years had very closely related HCV isolates. Unrelated HCV isolates as well as sequences obtained from an HCV outbreak in a plasmapheresis center were found in different, distantly related branches. These findings provide strong evidence for nosocomial transmission of the virus, despite following strict general hygiene precautions. The production of anti-HCV antibody was delayed significantly or seroconversion did not occur at all during the period of observation in 8 out of 14 newly infected HCV RNA positive patients. Close-meshed reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses on apparently non infected patients within hemodialysis units and upon admission of new patients is strongly recommended for the early detection and prevention of outbreaks of HCV.

Nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus

Nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) may occur in a variety of circumstances. This problem is best characterised in haemodialysis units. In this setting, molecular analysis of viral isolates indicates that patient to patient is the most frequent mode of HCV transmission. Spreading of HCV is mainly related to non-strict observance of universal precautionary measures, which are an efficient and, possibly, sufficient means for prevention. Epidemics or single instances of patient-to-patient transmission have only occasionally been reported in hospital settings other than haemodialysis units, and, again, non-observance of universal precautionary measures, or inadequate cleaning or disinfecting of medical instruments was involved. Transmission from an infected surgeon to patients has been reported, but infection from doctors to patients seems to be exceptional. Thus, although prospective studies have not been performed, nosocomial transmission of HCV unrelated to haemodialysis appears to be an infrequent and preventable event.

Hepatitis C virus and blood transfusion: past and present risks

The risk of HCV transmission by blood and blood products has been greatly reduced since the early 1980's. Selection of non-remunerated donors, donor selection to prevent HIV transmission, initial surrogate testing in some regions, and introduction of anti-HCV testing have all contributed to this. ALT surrogate testing has become obsolete since the introduction of anti-HCV testing. The residual risk of HCV transmission due to donations in the anti-HCV window period at present is about 1 in 100 000 transfusions of cellular products, and transmission of HCV by plasma products treated with modern inactivation methods such as solvent-detergent treatment, has not been reported. Hemovigilance programmes, which are presently being installed, will provide more data on the safety of blood transfusion. Introduction of HCV nucleic amplification technology (NAT) as a quality control of manufacturing pools for plasma products or as a form of blood donor screening by minipools is anticipated in many European countries for the coming year. Given industrial developments, NAT testing of individual blood donations may become available within the next 2 years. HCV NAT testing will further annihilate the residual risk, and the cost-effectiveness will become relatively low in comparison with other public health measures.

Hepatitis C epidemiology

Hepatitis C virus infection occurs in all parts of the world. Infection is generally due to percutaneous exposures, though sexual and perinatal transmission may occur. While further study is needed to elucidate the biology of HCV transmission and develop vaccines for prevention, new HCV infections can be reduced by economic development and education regarding blood-borne infections.