Effect of a new model of hemodialysis potassium removal on the control of ventricular arrhythmias

Pre- to post-dialysis potassium gradient and mortality in patients on hemodialysis: A propensity-matched analysis

INTRODUCTION

Pre- to post-dialysis potassium gradient (ΔK) has arrhythmogenic effects; however, its effect on mortality remains unclear. The relationship between ΔK and mortality was assessed.

METHODS

All patients undergoing hemodialysis in Beijing in 2014 were eligible for inclusion. The low (≤1.2 mmol/L), median (1.2-1.8 mmol/L), and high (>1.8 mmol/L) ΔK groups were matched by sex, age, diabetes, and dialysis time for enrollmen. The primary and secondary outcomes were all-cause and cardiovascular death within the follow-up. Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of ΔK on mortality. We also analyzed the associations of combinations of ΔK and pre-dialysis potassium with mortality.

RESULTS

We enrolled 2181 patients in three matched groups (n = 727 per group). The median follow-up was 72.0 (interquartile range, 53.7-72.0) months. All-cause mortality occurred in 215/727 (29.6%), 95/727 (13.1%), and 198/727 (27.2%) patients in the low-, median-, and high-ΔK groups, respectively. After adjusting for multiple factors, the median ΔK group had better survival than the low- (hazard ratio (HR), 1.91; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.45-2.52; p < 0.001) and high-ΔK groups (HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.57-2.99; p < 0.001). Further analysis based on pre-dialysis potassium revealed that when maintaining a level of 4.5-5.5 mmol/L and ΔK of 1.2-1.8 mmol/L, patients had the lowest risk of mortality, whereas the highest risk was observed when pre-dialysis potassium was >5.5 mmol/L and ΔK was >1.8 mmol/L.

CONCLUSION

Maintaining serum potassium within a appropriate range and reducing potassium fluctuations during dialysis may help to reduce the mortality risk of maintenance hemodialysis patients. These findings provide important data support for the quality control of hemodialysis.

Interventions for preventing haemodialysis dysequilibrium syndrome

BACKGROUND

Dialysis dysequilibrium syndrome (DDS) refers to neurological symptoms usually seen during or after new initiation or following reinitiation of haemodialysis (HD) after missing multiple sessions. DDS is associated with death and morbidity. We studied interventions aimed at preventing DDS.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of different types of interventions for preventing DDS.

SEARCH METHODS

We contacted the information specialist and searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 8 May 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register were identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any intervention against standard care, including individuals initiated on HD, regardless of age.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently determined study eligibility, assessed quality and extracted data. Data were collected on methods, interventions, participants, and outcomes (DDS incidence, severe DDS, death, adverse events). Risk ratios (RR) and confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) tool. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included two RCTs, enrolling 32 adult participants. Interventions included were slow dialysis, sodium modelling, standard sodium dialysate, and high sodium dialysate. The risk of bias was of some concern to high risk of bias in both studies. Slow dialysis compared to sodium modelling (1 study, 15 participants) may result in little to no difference in DDS, severe DDS, and death (low certainty evidence) and has uncertain effects on adverse events (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.15 to 11.64; very low certainty evidence). Standard sodium dialysate compared to high sodium dialysate (1 study, 17 participants) has uncertain effects on the incidence of DDS (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.12), severe DDS (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.02 to 10.32), and adverse events (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.02) (very low certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In HD patients, sodium modelling, compared to slow dialysis, may result in little to no difference in DDS and death (low certainty evidence) and has uncertain effects on adverse events (very low certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain for the effect of high-sodium dialysate and standard sodium dialysate on DDS, death and adverse events (very low certainty evidence).

The conundrum of the complex relationship between acute kidney injury and cardiac arrhythmias

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is defined by a rapid increase in serum creatinine levels, reduced urine output, or both. Death may occur in 16%-49% of patients admitted to an intensive care unit with severe AKI. Complex arrhythmias are a potentially serious complication in AKI patients with pre-existing or AKI-induced heart damage and myocardial dysfunction, fluid overload, and especially electrolyte and acid-base disorders representing the pathogenetic mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis. Cardiac arrhythmias, in turn, increase the risk of poor renal outcomes, including AKI. Arrhythmic risk in AKI patients receiving kidney replacement treatment may be reduced by modifying dialysis/replacement fluid composition. The most common arrhythmia observed in AKI patients is atrial fibrillation. Severe hyperkalemia, sometimes combined with hypocalcemia, causes severe bradyarrhythmias in this clinical setting. Although the likelihood of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias is reportedly low, the combination of cardiac ischemia and specific electrolyte or acid-base abnormalities may increase this risk, particularly in AKI patients who require kidney replacement treatment. The purpose of this review is to summarize the available epidemiological, pathophysiological, and prognostic evidence aiming to clarify the complex relationships between AKI and cardiac arrhythmias.

Lethal ventricular arrhythmia can be prevented by adjusting the dialysate potassium concentration and the use of anti-arrhythmic agents: a case report and literature review

Background

Hypokalemia is common in patients with malnutrition undergoing hemodialysis and is often involved in the development of lethal arrhythmia. Moreover, hemodialysis therapy decreases the serum potassium concentration due to potassium removal to the dialysate. However, it is difficult to adjust the dialysate potassium concentration owing to the use of the central dialysate delivery system in Japan. Here, we have presented a case undergoing hemodialysis with dialysate potassium concentration adjustment to prevent ventricular arrhythmia.

Case presentation

A 56-year-old man with Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy and chronic heart failure was admitted to our hospital and needed subsequent hemodialysis therapy due to renal dysfunction. During hemodialysis, the cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator was activated to the treatment of his lethal ventricular arrhythmia. Decreases in serum potassium concentration after hemodialysis and changes in serum potassium concentration during HD were considered the causes of lethal ventricular arrythmia. Therefore, along with using anti-arrhythmic agents, the dialysate potassium concentration was increased from 2.0 to 3.5 mEq/L to minimize changes in the serum potassium concentration during hemodialysis. Post-dialysis hypokalemia disappeared and these changes during hemodialysis were minimized, and no lethal ventricular arrhythmia occurred thereafter.

Conclusions

In this case, we prevented lethal arrhythmia by maintaining the serum potassium concentration by increasing the dialysate potassium concentration, in addition to the use of anti-arrhythmic agents. In the acute phase of patients with frequent lethal arrhythmia undergoing hemodialysis, an increase in dialysate potassium concentration may be an effective method for preventing arrhythmogenic complications.

Potassium responses to sodium zirconium cyclosilicate in hyperkalemic hemodialysis patients: post-hoc analysis of DIALIZE

BACKGROUND

Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for hyperkalemia in maintenance hemodialysis patients. In post-hoc analyses of the phase 3b DIALIZE study, we examined the spectrum of potassium responses to SZC.

METHODS

Post-hoc analyses with SZC and placebo included: the number of long interdialytic interval (LIDI) visits during the 4-week evaluation period where patients attained pre-dialysis serum potassium (sK⁺) concentrations of 4.0-5.0 and 4.0-5.5 mmol/L; potassium gradient (the difference between pre-dialysis sK⁺ and dialysate potassium) at days 36, 43, 50, and 57, and change from baseline to the end of treatment (EOT) using categories of potassium gradient (1 to < 2, 2 to < 3, 3 to < 4, and ≥ 4 mmol/L).

RESULTS

A greater proportion of patients achieved the ranges of pre-dialysis sK⁺ concentration with SZC versus placebo for ≥1, ≥ 2, ≥ 3, and 4 LIDI visits over 4 weeks; 23.7 and 48.5% of patients in the SZC group achieved pre-dialysis sK⁺ concentrations of 4.0-5.0 and 4.0-5.5 mmol/L, respectively, at all 4 LIDI visits. Baseline mean potassium gradient was similar with SZC and placebo. At day 57, mean (standard deviation) potassium gradient was 2.78 (0.08) mmol/L with SZC and 3.52 (0.08) mmol/L with placebo; mean difference (95% confidence interval) was - 0.74 mmol/L (- 0.97 to - 0.52). A greater reduction in potassium gradient category from baseline towards lower-risk categories at EOT was observed with SZC versus placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

These analyses expand our knowledge of the spectrum of potassium responses with SZC in hyperkalemic hemodialysis patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03303521 .

Sudden cardiac death in dialysis patients: different causes and management strategies

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) represents a major cause of death in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). The precise estimate of its incidence is difficult to establish because studies on the incidence of SCD in ESKD are often combined with those related to sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) occurring during a haemodialysis (HD) session. The aim of the European Dialysis Working Group of ERA-EDTA was to critically review the current literature examining the causes of extradialysis SCD and intradialysis SCA in ESKD patients and potential management strategies to reduce the incidence of such events. Extradialysis SCD and intradialysis SCA represent different clinical situations and should be kept distinct. Regarding the problem, numerically less relevant, of patients affected by intradialysis SCA, some modifiable risk factors have been identified, such as a low concentration of potassium and calcium in the dialysate, and some advantages linked to the presence of automated external defibrillators in dialysis units have been documented. The problem of extra-dialysis SCD is more complex. A reduced left ventricular ejection fraction associated with SCD is present only in a minority of cases occurring in HD patients. This is the proof that SCD occurring in ESKD has different characteristics compared with SCD occurring in patients with ischaemic heart disease and/or heart failure and not affected by ESKD. Recent evidence suggests that the fatal arrhythmia in this population may be due more frequently to bradyarrhythmias than to tachyarrhythmias. This fact may partly explain why several studies could not demonstrate an advantage of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in preventing SCD in ESKD patients. Electrolyte imbalances, frequently present in HD patients, could explain part of the arrhythmic phenomena, as suggested by the relationship between SCD and timing of the HD session. However, the high incidence of SCD in patients on peritoneal dialysis suggests that other risk factors due to cardiac comorbidities and uraemia per se may contribute to sudden mortality in ESKD patients.

Subjective global assessment of nutrition, dialysis quality, and the theory of the scientific method in Nephrology practice

In an era of evidence-based medicine and dialysis performance measures, there is strong motivation to find specific, objective, quantifiable, and reproducible parameters to characterize the clinical condition of chronic kidney disease patients and to present population-wide statistics that may describe quality of care in dialysis centers. Yet, in the last three decades, several studies demonstrated that while parameters including Kt/V urea, serum phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, serum cholesterol fulfill all these criteria, efforts to optimize these lab parameters failed to improve survival on dialysis. However, subjective assessments of nutrition including subjective global assessment and malnutrition-inflammation score, while not ideally suited for statistical analysis and not optimal from the point of view of scientific methodology due to their general, semi-quantifiable, subjective nature have, nevertheless, proved themselves as some of the strongest predictors of clinical outcomes in the dialysis population. Where does this paradox leave us? We propose that a deeper understanding of relevance of these variables in the dialysis population may improve appreciation of the clinical situation of individual patients and may result in a paradigm shift from dialysis adequacy to quality dialysis.

Hemodialysis treatment in patients with severe electrolyte disorders: Management of hyperkalemia and hyponatremia

Significant deviations of serum potassium and sodium levels are frequently observed in hospitalized patients and are both associated with increased all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality. The presence of acute or chronic renal failure facilitates the pathogenesis and complicates the clinical management. In the absence of reliable outcome data in the context of dialysis prescription, requirement of renal replacement therapy in patients with severe electrolyte disturbances constitutes a therapeutic challenge. Recommendations for intradialytic management are based on pathophysiologic reasoning and clinical observations only, and as such, heterogeneous and limited to expert opinion level. This article reviews current strategies for the management of severe hyperkalemia and hyponatremia in hemodialysis patients.

Intradialytic Hypotension and Cardiac Arrhythmias in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis: Results from the Monitoring in Dialysis Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (HD) have a high incidence of cardiac events, including arrhythmia and sudden death. Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a common complication of HD and is associated with development of reduced myocardial perfusion, a potential risk factor for arrhythmia.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We analyzed data from the Monitoring in Dialysis study, which used implantable loop recorders to detect and continuously monitor electrocardiographic data from patients on maintenance HD (n=66 from the United States and India) over a 6-month period (n=4720 sessions). Negative binomial mixed effects regression was used to test the association of IDH₂₀ (decline in systolic BP >20 mm Hg from predialysis systolic BP) and IDH_0-20 (decline in systolic BP 0-20 mm Hg from predialysis systolic BP) with clinically significant arrhythmia (bradycardia≤40 bpm for ≥6 seconds, asystole≥3 seconds, ventricular tachycardia ≥130 bpm for ≥30 seconds, or patient-marked events) during HD.

RESULTS

The median age of participants was 58 (25th-75th percentile, 49-66) years; 70% were male; and 65% were from the United States. IDH occurred in 2251 (48%) of the 4720 HD sessions analyzed, whereas IDH_0-20 occurred during 1773 sessions (38%). The number of sessions complicated by least one intradialytic clinically significant arrhythmia was 27 (1.2%) where IDH₂₀ occurred and 15 (0.8%) where IDH_0-20 occurred. Participants who experienced IDH₂₀ (versus not) had a nine-fold greater rate of developing an intradialytic clinically significant arrhythmia (incidence rate ratio, 9.4; 95% confidence interval, 3.0 to 29.4), whereas IDH_0-20 was associated with a seven-fold higher rate (incidence rate ratio, 7.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.1 to 25.4).

CONCLUSIONS

IDH is common in patients on maintenance HD and is associated with a greater risk of developing intradialytic clinically significant arrhythmia.

Fluctuations in plasma potassium in patients on dialysis

Plasma potassium concentration is maintained in a narrow range to avoid deleterious electrophysiologic consequences of both abnormally low and high levels. This is achieved by redundant physiologic mechanisms, with the kidneys playing a central role in maintaining both short-term plasma potassium stability and long-term total body potassium balance. In patients with end-stage renal disease, the lack of kidney function reduces the body’s ability to maintain normal physiologic potassium balance. Routine thrice-weekly dialysis therapy achieves long-term total body potassium mass balance, but the intermittent nature of dialytic therapy can result in wide fluctuations in plasma potassium concentration and consequently contribute to an increased risk of arrhythmogenicity. Various dialytic and nondialytic interventions can reduce the magnitude of these fluctuations, but the impact of such interventions on clinical outcomes remains unclear.

A simple modification of dialysate potassium: its impact on plasma potassium concentrations and the electrocardiogram

Background

Sudden death is frequent in haemodialysis (HD) patients. Both hyperkalaemia and change of plasma potassium (K) concentrations induced by HD could explain this. The impact of increasing dialysate K by 1 mEq/L on plasma K concentrations and electrocardiogram (ECG) results before and after HD sessions was studied.

Methods

Patients with pre-dialysis K >5.5 mEq/L were excluded. ECG and K measurements were obtained before and after the first session of the week for 2 weeks. Then, K in the dialysate was increased (from 1 or 3 to 2 or 4 mEq/L, respectively). Blood and ECG measurements were repeated after 2 weeks of this change.

Results

Twenty-seven prevalent HD patients were included. As expected, a significant decrease in K concentrations was observed after the dialysis session, but this decrease was significantly lower after the switch to an increased dialysate K. The pre-dialysis K concentrations were not different after changing, but post-dialysis K concentrations were higher after switching (P < 0.0001), with a lower incidence of post-dialysis hypokalaemia. Regarding ECG, before switching, the QT interval (QT) dispersion increased during the session, whereas no difference was observed after switching. One week after switching, post-dialysis QT dispersion [38 (34-42) ms] was lower than post-dialysis QT dispersion 2 weeks and 1 week before switching [42 (38-57) ms, P = 0.0004; and 40 (35-50) ms, P = 0.0002].

Conclusions

A simple increase of 1 mEq/L of K in the dialysate is associated with a lower risk of hypokalaemia and a lower QT dispersion after the dialysis session. Further study is needed to determine if such a strategy is associated with a lower risk of sudden death.

Serum-to-dialysate potassium gradient and its association with short-term outcomes in hemodialysis patients

Background

A high serum-to-dialysate potassium (K+) gradient at the start of dialysis leads to rapid lowering of serum K+ and may confer a greater risk of adverse events. Here, we examined the near-term association of K+ gradient with clinical outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective (2010-11) event-based study considered 830 741 patient-intervals, each defined by a pre-dialysis measurement of serum K+ made among adult Medicare Parts A and B enrollees who received in-center hemodialysis on a Monday/Wednesday/Friday schedule at a large US dialysis organization. K+ gradient was considered based on the difference in K+ concentration (serum-dialysate) on the date of measurement; analyses accounted for multiple observations per patient. Outcomes considered were: all-cause and cardiovascular hospital admissions, emergency department (ED) visits and deaths.

Results

Higher K+ gradient was associated with younger age, greater fistula use, lower comorbidity scores and better nutritional indices. Adjusting for patient differences, there was a dose-response relationship between higher K+ gradient and greater risks of all-cause hospitalization and ED visit. A similar trend was seen for cardiovascular hospitalization but did not achieve statistical significance. No associations were observed with mortality, potentially due to a low number of events.

Conclusions

Higher K+ gradient is independently associated with greater risk of all-cause hospitalizations and ED visits. Further research is needed to determine whether interventions that reduce the K+ gradient ameliorate this risk.

Management of hyperkalemia in patients with kidney disease: a position paper endorsed by the Italian Society of Nephrology

Hyperkalemia (HK) is the most common electrolyte disturbance observed in patients with kidney disease, particularly in those in whom diabetes and heart failure are present or are on treatment with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASIs). HK is recognised as a major risk of potentially life threatening cardiac arrhythmic complications. When an acute reduction of renal function manifests, both in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and in those with previously normal renal function, HK is the main indication for the execution of urgent medical treatment and the recourse to extracorporeal replacement therapies. In patients with end-stage renal disease, the presence of HK not responsive to medical therapy is an indication at the beginning of chronic renal replacement therapy. HK can also be associated indirectly with the progression of CKD, because the finding of high potassium values leads to withdrawal of treatment with RAASIs, which constitute the first choice nephro-protective treatment. It is therefore essential to identify patients at risk of developing HK, and to implement therapeutic interventions aimed at preventing and treating this dangerous complication of kidney disease. Current strategies aimed at the prevention and treatment of HK are still unsatisfactory, as evidenced by the relatively high prevalence of HK also in patients under stable nephrology care, and even in the ideal setting of randomized clinical trials where optimal treatment and monitoring are mandatory. This position paper will review the main therapeutic interventions to be implemented for the prevention, detection and treatment of HK in patients with CKD on conservative care, in those on dialysis, in patients in whom renal disease is associated with diabetes, heart failure, resistant hypertension and who are on treatment with RAASIs, and finally in those presenting with severe acute HK.

A Phase 3b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate for Reducing the Incidence of Predialysis Hyperkalemia

BACKGROUND

Patients with ESRD have minimal renal potassium excretion and, despite hemodialysis, often have persistent predialysis hyperkalemia. The DIALIZE study (NCT03303521) evaluated sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) in the management of hyperkalemia in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

In the DIALIZE study, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b multicenter study, we randomized adults with ESRD who were managed by three-times weekly hemodialysis and had predialysis hyperkalemia to receive placebo or SZC 5 g once daily on non-dialysis days, and titrated towards maintaining normokalemia over 4 weeks, in 5 g increments to a maximum of 15 g. The primary efficacy outcome was proportion of patients during the 4-week stable-dose evaluation period who maintained predialysis serum potassium of 4.0-5.0 mmol/L during at least three of four hemodialysis treatments after the long interdialytic interval and did not require urgent rescue therapy to reduce serum potassium.

RESULTS

In total, 196 patients (mean [standard deviation (SD)] age =58.1 [13.7] years old) were randomized to sodium zirconium cyclosilicate or placebo. Of 97 patients receiving sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, 41.2% met the primary end point and were deemed treatment responders compared with 1.0% of 99 patients receiving placebo (P<0.001). Rescue therapy to reduce serum potassium during the treatment period was required by 2.1% of patients taking sodium zirconium cyclosilicate versus 5.1% taking placebo. Serious adverse events occurred in 7% and 8% of patients in sodium zirconium cyclosilicate and placebo groups, respectively. The two groups displayed comparable interdialytic weight gain. There were few episodes of hypokalemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for predialysis hyperkalemia in patients with ESRD undergoing adequate hemodialysis.

Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Treatment of Intradialytic Hypotension

Individuals with ESKD requiring maintenance hemodialysis face a unique hemodynamic challenge, typically on a thrice-weekly basis. In an effort to achieve some degree of euvolemia, ultrafiltration goals often involve removal of the equivalent of an entire plasma volume. Maintenance of adequate end-organ perfusion in this setting is dependent on the institution of a variety of complex compensatory mechanisms. Unfortunately, secondary to a myriad of patient- and dialysis-related factors, this compensation often falls short and results in intradialytic hypotension. Physicians and patients have developed a greater appreciation for the breadth of adverse outcomes associated with intradialytic hypotension, including higher cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. In this review, we summarize the evidence for adverse outcomes associated with intradialytic hypotension, explore the underlying pathophysiology, and use this as a basis to introduce potential strategies for its prevention and treatment.

Dialysate potassium concentration: Should mass balance trump electrophysiology?

Nephrologists are faced with a difficult dilemma in choosing the ideal dialysis prescription to maintain neutral potassium mass balance. Should potassium mass balance goals prioritize the normalization of serum potassium levels using low potassium dialysate at the expense of provoking intradialytic arrhythmias, or should mass balance goals favor permissive hyperkalemia using higher dialysate potassium to avoid rapid intradialytic fluxes at the risk of more interdialytic arrhythmias? This review examines the factors that determine potassium mass balance among HD patients, the relationships between serum and dialysate potassium levels and outcomes, and concludes by examining currently available approaches to reducing risk of arrhythmias while managing potassium mass balance.

Dialysate Potassium and Mortality in a Prospective Hemodialysis Cohort

BACKGROUND

Studies examining the association of dialysate potassium concentration and mortality in hemodialysis patients show conflicting findings. We hypothesized that low dialysate potassium concentrations are associated with higher mortality, particularly in patients with high pre-dialysis serum potassium concentrations.

METHODS

We evaluated 624 hemodialysis patients from the prospective Malnutrition, Diet, and Racial Disparities in Kidney Disease study recruited from 16 outpatient dialysis facilities over 2011-2015 who underwent protocolized collection of dialysis treatment characteristics every 6 months. We examined the association of dialysate potassium concentration, categorized as 1, 2, and 3 mEq/L, with all-cause mortality risk in the -overall cohort, and stratified by pre-dialysis serum potassium (< 5 vs. ≥5 mEq/L) using case-mix adjusted Cox models.

RESULTS

In baseline analyses, dialysate potassium concentrations of 1 mEq/L were associated with higher mortality, whereas concentrations of 3 mEq/L were associated with similar mortality in the overall cohort (reference: 2 mEq/L): adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs; 95% CI) 1.70 (1.01-2.88) and 0.95 (0.64-1.39), respectively. In analyses stratified by serum potassium, baseline dialysate potassium concentrations of 1 mEq/L were associated with higher mortality in patients with serum potassium ≥5 mEq/L but not in those with serum potassium < 5 mEq/L: aHRs (95% CI) 2.87 (1.51-5.46) and 0.74 (0.27-2.07), respectively (p interaction = 0.04). These findings were robust with incremental adjustment for serum potassium, potassium-binding resins, and potassium-modifying medications.

CONCLUSION

Low (1 mEq/L) dialysate potassium -concentrations were associated with higher mortality, particularly in hemodialysis patients with high pre-dialysis serum potassium. Further studies are needed to identify therapeutic strategies that mitigate inter-dialytic serum potassium accumulation and subsequent high dialysate serum potassium gradients in this population.

Dialysate Potassium, Dialysate Magnesium, and Hemodialysis Risk

One of the fundamental goals of the hemodialysis prescription is to maintain serum potassium levels within a narrow normal range during both the intradialytic and interdialytic intervals. Considering the extraordinarily high rate of cardiovascular mortality in the hemodialysis population, clinicians are obligated to explore whether factors related to dialytic potassium removal can be modified to improve clinical outcomes. Observational studies and circumstantial evidence suggest that extreme concentrations of serum and dialysate potassium can trigger cardiac arrest. In this review, we provide an overview of factors affecting overall potassium balance and factors modulating potassium dialysate fluxes in dialysis, and we review data linking serum and dialysate potassium concentrations with arrhythmias, cardiovascular events, and mortality. We explore potential interactions between serum and dialysate magnesium levels and risks associated with dialysate potassium levels. Finally, we conclude with proposed dialytic and novel nondialytic approaches to optimize outcomes related to potassium homeostasis in patients on hemodialysis. Dialysis clinicians need to consider changes in the overall clinical scenario when choosing dialysate potassium concentrations, and an effective change in practice will require more frequent serum potassium monitoring and responsive dialysis care teams.

Treatment of Severe Hyperkalemia: Confronting 4 Fallacies

Severe hyperkalemia is a medical emergency that can cause lethal arrhythmias. Successful management requires monitoring of the electrocardiogram and serum potassium concentrations, the prompt institution of therapies that work both synergistically and sequentially, and timely repeat dosing as necessary. It is of concern then that, based on questions about effectiveness and safety, many physicians no longer use 3 key modalities in the treatment of severe hyperkalemia: sodium bicarbonate, sodium polystyrene sulfonate (Kayexalate [Concordia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Oakville, ON, Canada], SPS [CMP Pharma, Farmville, NC]), and hemodialysis with low potassium dialysate. After reviewing older reports and newer information, I believe that these exclusions are ill advised. In this article, I briefly discuss the treatment of severe hyperkalemia and detail why these modalities are safe and effective and merit inclusion in the treatment of severe hyperkalemia.

Dialysate Composition for Hemodialysis: Changes and Changing Risk

Dialysate composition is a critical aspect of the hemodialysis prescription. Despite this, trial data are almost entirely lacking to help guide the optimal dialysate composition. Often, the concentrations of key components are chosen intuitively, and dialysate composition may be determined by default based on dialysate manufacturer specifications or hemodialysis facility practices. In this review, we examine the current epidemiological evidence guiding selection of dialysate bicarbonate, calcium, magnesium, and potassium, and identify unresolved issues for which pragmatic clinical trials are needed.

Dialysate Potassium, Serum Potassium, Mortality, and Arrhythmia Events in Hemodialysis: Results From the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS)

BACKGROUND

Sudden death is a leading cause of death in patients on maintenance hemodialysis therapy. During hemodialysis sessions, the gradient between serum and dialysate levels results in rapid electrolyte shifts, which may contribute to arrhythmias and sudden death. Controversies exist about the optimal electrolyte concentration in the dialysate; specifically, it is unclear whether patient outcomes differ among those treated with a dialysate potassium concentration of 3 mEq/L compared to 2 mEq/L.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

55,183 patients from 20 countries in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) phases 1 to 5 (1996-2015).

PREDICTOR

Dialysate potassium concentration at study entry.

OUTCOMES

Cox regression was used to estimate the association between dialysate potassium concentration and both all-cause mortality and an arrhythmia composite outcome (arrhythmia-related hospitalization or sudden death), adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 16.5 months, 24% of patients died and 7% had an arrhythmia composite outcome. No meaningful difference in clinical outcomes was observed for patients treated with a dialysate potassium concentration of 3 versus 2 mEq/L (adjusted HRs were 0.96 [95% CI, 0.91-1.01] for mortality and 0.98 [95% CI, 0.88-1.08] for arrhythmia composite). Results were similar across predialysis serum potassium levels. As in prior studies, higher serum potassium level was associated with adverse outcomes. However, dialysate potassium concentration had only minimal impact on serum potassium level measured predialysis (+0.09 [95% CI, 0.05-0.14] mEq/L serum potassium per 1 mEq/L greater dialysate potassium concentration).

LIMITATIONS

Data were not available for delivered (vs prescribed) dialysate potassium concentration and postdialysis serum potassium level; possible unmeasured confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

In combination, these results suggest that approaches other than altering dialysate potassium concentration (eg, education on dietary potassium sources and prescription of potassium-binding medications) may merit further attention to reduce risks associated with high serum potassium levels.

Optimizing dialysate potassium

Potassium shifts in thrice weekly HD patients are likely a reversible cause of arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. In general, a dialysate potassium <2.0 mmol/L should be avoided, and many patients with dialysate potassium of 2 mmol/L could safely be adjusted upwards. The ideal predialysis serum potassium should be around 5.0 mmol/L. Trends in serum potassium and not single values, should inform chronic changes of dialysate potassium prescription. Atypical values should be dealt with as a one off, but should not lead to chronic bath changes. Referral to a renal dietician for counseling to limit dietary potassium intake is vital to prevent recurrence of these atypical episodes. Finally, facilities should develop and implement a formal and reliable way to alert the physician about possible potassium bath mismatching. This facility level approach works best if a policy is developed and endorsed by all involved stakeholders.

Sudden cardiac death and chronic kidney disease: From pathophysiology to treatment strategies

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients demonstrate higher rates of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity; and increased incidence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) with declining kidney failure. Coronary artery disease (CAD) associated risk factors are the major determinants of SCD in the general population. However, current evidence suggests that in CKD patients, traditional cardiovascular risk factors may play a lesser role. Complex relationships between CKD-specific risk factors, structural heart disease, and ventricular arrhythmias (VA) contribute to the high risk of SCD. In dialysis patients, the occurrence of VA and SCD could be exacerbated by electrolyte shifts, divalent ion abnormalities, sympathetic overactivity, inflammation and iron toxicity. As outcomes in CKD patients after cardiac arrest are poor, primary and secondary prevention of SCD and cardiac arrest could reduce cardiovascular mortality in patients with CKD.

Low Potassium Dialysate as a Protective Factor of Sudden Cardiac Death in Hemodialysis Patients with Hyperkalemia

AIM

Hyperkalemia increases the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in hemodialysis patients. Our objective was to determine the association between administering low potassium dialysate to hyperkalemic hemodialysis patients and SCD.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study with patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis from May 1, 2006, through December 31, 2013. The dialysate composition was adjusted over time according to monthly laboratory results. A 1.0 mEq/L potassium dialysate was applied in patients with predialysis hyperkalemia (>5.5 mEq/L) and was included as a time-dependent confounding factor. The clinical characteristics of enrolled patients, the incidence and timing of SCD and risk factors for all-cause mortality and SCD were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 312 patients on maintenance hemodialysis during the study period. One hundred and fifty-seven patients had been dialyzed against a 1.0 mEq/L potassium dialysate at least once. The rates of all-cause mortality and SCD were 48.17 and 20.74 per 1000 patient-years, respectively. A 1.12-fold increase in the risk of SCD in the 24-hour period starting with the hemodialysis procedure and a 1.36-fold increase in the 24 hours preceding a weekly cycle were found (p = 0.017). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models showed that age, diabetes mellitus and predialysis hyperkalemia (>5.0 mEq/L) were significant predictors of all-cause mortality and SCD. Exposure to 1.0 mEq/L potassium dialysate, Kt/V, and serum albumin were independent protective factors against all-cause mortality. Only exposure to 1.0 mEq/L potassium dialysate significantly prevented SCD (hazard ratio = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.13-0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Using low potassium dialysate in hyperkalemic hemodialysis patients may prevent SCD.

Optimizing haemodialysate composition

Survival and quality of life of dialysis patients are strictly dependent on the quality of the haemodialysis (HD) treatment. In this respect, dialysate composition, including water purity, plays a crucial role. A major aim of HD is to normalize predialysis plasma electrolyte and mineral concentrations, while minimizing wide swings in the patient's intradialytic plasma concentrations. Adequate sodium (Na) and water removal is critical for preventing intra- and interdialytic hypotension and pulmonary edema. Avoiding both hyper- and hypokalaemia prevents life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias. Optimal calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) dialysate concentrations may protect the cardiovascular system and the bones, preventing extraskeletal calcifications, severe secondary hyperparathyroidism and adynamic bone disease. Adequate bicarbonate concentration [HCO₃⁻] maintains a stable pH in the body fluids for appropriate protein and membrane functioning and also protects the bones. An adequate dialysate glucose concentration prevents severe hyperglycaemia and life-threating hypoglycaemia, which can lead to severe cardiovascular complications and a worsening of diabetic comorbidities.

A neglected issue in dialysis practice: haemodialysate

The intended function of dialysate fluid is to correct the composition of uraemic blood to physiologic levels, both by reducing the concentration of uraemic toxins and correcting electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities. This is accomplished principally by formulating a dialysate whose constituent concentrations are set to approximate normal values in the body. Sodium balance is the cornerstone of intradialysis cardiovascular stability and good interdialytic blood pressure control; plasma potassium concentration and its intradialytic kinetics certainly play a role in the genesis of cardiac arrhythmias; calcium is related to haemodynamic stability, mineral bone disease and also cardiac arrhythmias; the role of magnesium is still controversial; lastly, acid buffering by means of base supplementation is one of the major roles of dialysis. In conclusion, learning about the art and the science of fashioning haemodialysates is one of the best ways to further the understanding of the pathophysiologic processes underlying myriad acid-base, fluid, electrolyte as well as blood pressure abnormalities of the uraemic patient on maintenance haemodialysis.

Dialysate and serum potassium in hemodialysis

Most patients with end-stage renal disease depend on intermittent hemodialysis to maintain levels of serum potassium and other electrolytes within a normal range. However, one of the challenges has been the safety of using a low-potassium dialysate to achieve that goal, given the concern about the effects that rapid and/or large changes in serum potassium concentrations may have on cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmia. Additionally, in this patient population, there is a high prevalence of structural cardiac changes and ischemic heart disease, making them even more susceptible to acute arrhythmogenic triggers. This concern is highlighted by the knowledge that about two-thirds of all cardiac deaths in dialysis are due to sudden cardiac death and that sudden cardiac death accounts for 25% of the overall death for end-stage renal disease. Developing new approaches and practice standards for potassium removal during dialysis, as well as understanding other modifiable triggers of sudden cardiac death, such as other electrolyte components of the dialysate (magnesium and calcium), rapid ultrafiltration rates, and safety of a number of medications (ie, drugs that prolong the QT interval or use of digoxin), are critical in order to decrease the unacceptably high cardiac mortality experienced by hemodialysis-dependent patients.

Low dialysate potassium concentration: an overrated risk factor for cardiac arrhythmia?

Serum potassium concentrations rise with dietary potassium intake between dialysis sessions and are often at hyperkalemic levels by the next session. Conversely, potassium concentrations fall during each hemodialysis, and sometimes reach hypokalemic levels by the end. Low potassium dialysate, which rapidly decreases serum potassium and often brings it to hypokalemic levels, is almost universally considered a risk factor for life-threatening arrhythmias. While there is little doubt about the threat of lethal arrhythmias due to hyperkalemia, convincing evidence for the danger of low potassium dialysate and rapid or excess potassium removal has not been forthcoming. The original report of more frequent ventricular ectopy in early dialysis that was improved by reducing potassium removal has received very little confirmation from subsequent studies. Furthermore, the occurrence of ventricular ectopy during dialysis does not appear to predict mortality. Studies relating sudden deaths to low potassium dialysate are countered by studies with more thorough adjustment for markers of poor health. Dialysate potassium concentrations affect the excursions of serum potassium levels above or below the normal range, and have the potential to influence dialysis safety. Controlled studies of different dialysate potassium concentration and their effect on mortality and cardiac arrests have not been done. Until these results become available, I propose interim guidelines for the setting of dialysate potassium levels that may better balance risks and benefits.

Associates of cardiopulmonary arrest in the perihemodialytic period

Cardiopulmonary arrest during and proximate to hemodialysis is rare but highly fatal. Studies have examined peridialytic sudden cardiac event risk factors, but no study has considered associates of cardiopulmonary arrests (fatal and nonfatal events including cardiac and respiratory causes). This study was designed to elucidate patient and procedural factors associated with peridialytic cardiopulmonary arrest. Data for this case-control study were taken from the hemodialysis population at Fresenius Medical Care, North America. 924 in-center cardiopulmonary events (cases) and 75,538 controls were identified. Cases and controls were 1 : 5 matched on age, sex, race, and diabetes. Predictors of cardiopulmonary arrest were considered for logistic model inclusion. Missed treatments due to hospitalization, lower body mass, coronary artery disease, heart failure, lower albumin and hemoglobin, lower dialysate potassium, higher serum calcium, greater erythropoietin stimulating agent dose, and normalized protein catabolic rate (J-shaped) were associated with peridialytic cardiopulmonary arrest. Of these, lower albumin, hemoglobin, and body mass index; higher erythropoietin stimulating agent dose; and greater missed sessions had the strongest associations with outcome. Patient health markers and procedural factors are associated with peridialytic cardiopulmonary arrest. In addition to optimizing nutritional status, it may be prudent to limit exposure to low dialysate potassium (<2 K bath) and to use the lowest effective erythropoietin stimulating agent dose.

Sailing between Scylla and Charybdis: the high serum K-low dialysate K quandary

In HD patients, the optimal choice of dialysate K concentration is of paramount importance. Recent large observational studies have documented an association between low dialysate K concentration (< 2 or even <3 mEq/L) and a higher risk of sudden death. In this review, we first briefly discuss the available data concerning the link between hypokalemia and negative outcomes in non-CKD populations, especially after an acute myocardial infarction or in congestive heart failure. We next review the pathophysiology of the arrhythmogenic effect related to K fluxes during HD and discuss the dialytic strategies aiming at making potassium fall more gradual and thus at reducing the electrical disturbances triggered by the HD session. We conclude with practical recommendations regarding the optimal choice of K bath and the importance of more frequent monitoring of serum K in some clinical scenarios.

Outcomes after the long interdialytic break: implications for the dialytic prescription

A thrice-weekly schedule dominates hemodialysis practice today. Inherent in such a schedule is a 72-hour interweek break over the weekend. A growing body of evidence suggests that this break may be associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Five recent studies have linked dialysis session timing to higher cardiovascular event rates, and have shed light on possible underlying physiologic mechanisms. We reviewed outcome data linking the "long break" to cardiovascular outcomes, and suggest physiologic rationale for this relationship while identifying knowledge gaps that require further study to inform discussions regarding the application and composition of individualized dialysis prescriptions. Further work is needed to determine the relative importance of electrolyte perturbations and hemodynamic shifts in the relationship between the long break and cardiovascular mortality. The evidence suggests that at least in some at-risk patients, an individualized approach to the dialytic schedule and prescription is warranted.

The rise of hemodialysis machines: new technologies in minimizing cardiovascular complications

Hemodialysis (HD) is a life-saving treatment for more than 1,700,000 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage V. Every year the HD population becomes increasingly older (average age: 75 years) and more ill due to the associated comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease (heart failure, coronary heart disease and peripheral vascular disease), diabetes, hypertension and peripheral vascular disease. Most of the complications associated with HD involve the cardiovascular system. HD machines have been greatly improved over the last 30 years. We have moved from HD machines simply allowing extracorporeal circulation to high technological medical devices capable of very precisely controlling ultrafiltration, dialysis dose, the patient's core temperature, circulating plasma volume, plasma sodium and producing unlimited volumes of ultrapure dialysate. In this article, we will focus on some of the fundamental achievements in HD machine technology, with particular reference to monitoring tools and bioengineering approaches for biosignal analysis. We propose that along these lines of further development, HD machines in the future will enable a better online identification of patients at higher cardiovascular risk, thus allowing clinicians to select more appropriate treatment modalities and parameters.

Review: modelling the dialysate

Dialysate prescription is evolving as new technology allows greater opportunity to alter dialysate constituents throughout dialysis, providing scope for tailored prescription for an individual patient. The intention of modelling or profiling is to improve the tolerability of dialysis and long-term patient outcomes. This approach can be applied to both electrolytes and water. Despite these advances in technology, benefits of modelling have not been demonstrated consistently. This review examines the use of individual prescription and modelling of dialysate sodium, ultrafiltrate, potassium, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate and phosphate.

Avaliação da redução de potássio em hortaliças submetidas a diferentes métodos de cocção para possível utilização na dietoterapia renal

Objetivo Julgou-se relevante avaliar a concentração de potássio em vegetais crus submetidos ao remolho e cozidos sob diferentes formas - ebulição, micro-ondas e sob pressão - a fim de verificar se o remolho e as técnicas de cocção têm eficácia na redução da concentração desse mineral. Métodos O experimento foi realizado em delineamento casualizado, com esquema fatorial 3x5 (3 vegetais x 5 proce-dimentos) e 3 repetições nas análises. As hortaliças - batata, cenoura e brócolis - foram submetidas à análise dos teores de potássio por fotometria de chama IL, e compararam-se os tratamentos: cru, remolho em água, cocção em ebulição, micro-ondas e sob pressão. Resultados Nas amostras analisadas, para a batata o método remolho (232,2mg/g), ebulição (197,3mg/g), micro-ondas (170,3mg/g) e pressão (187,2mg/g) não diferiram de forma estatisticamente significativa entre si, da mesma forma para a cenoura, que obteve os valores de redução de 315,0mg/g, 309,9mg/g, 243,3mg/g e 210,6mg/g, respectivamente para remolho, ebulição, micro-ondas e pressão. Entretanto, para os brócolis, pode-se observar que os métodos de preparo em micro-ondas (280,1mg/g) e pressão (167,3mg/g)diferiram estatisticamente em relação aos outros métodos, mostrando-se mais eficazes na redução dos teores de potássio dessa hortaliça. Conclusão O remolho e os métodos de cocção mostraram-se eficazes na redução dos teores de potássio nas hortaliças, no entanto fatores como tempo, temperatura, recipiente, potência e frequência das ondas eletromagnéticas do micro-ondas podem influenciar os diferentes tipos de cocção.

Did 20 years of technological innovations in hemodialysis contribute to better patient outcomes?

During the past two decades, impressive technological innovations have been introduced in the field of hemodialysis. This review analyzes whether these have been translated into better patient survival. The potential impacts of an increase in dialysis dosage, the preference of high-flux versus low-flux membranes, the choice between convection and diffusion as dialysis strategy, the chemical composition and biologic purity of dialysate, the effect of sodium, potassium, volume profiling, and the intradialytic volume monitoring aiming at improving hemodynamic stability are explored. Studies in which the dialysis dosage was increased were not associated with increased patient survival, whereas the superiority of high-flux over low-flux membranes is not convincingly demonstrated. Although strict evidence is lacking, observational data suggest an advantage of convective over pure diffusive strategies. Longer duration of the dialysis sessions and/or higher frequency of dialysis is probably beneficial, but the results of powerful randomized, controlled trials should be awaited. Sodium profiling has more disadvantages than advantages, whereas potassium profiling mainly in arrhythmia-prone patients with ventricular hypertrophy should be considered. Intradialytic blood volume monitoring has reduced intradialytic hypotension episodes, but hard evidence for improving patient survival is lacking. Overall, the major technological advances in dialysis have not yet been translated into longer patient survival. Optimal predialysis care in preventing the cardiovascular damage that accumulates before the start of dialysis and timely creation of an arteriovenous fistula as vascular access is a more effective and more economic strategy in the long-term outcome of the dialysis patient.

End-Stage Renal Disease and Sudden Cardiac Death

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at a high risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD). SCD is the most common cause of death in this population and, as in the general population, ventricular arrhythmias seem to be the most common cause of SCD. The increased risk of SCD in ESRD is likely due to factors that are unique to the metabolic derangements associated with this state, as well as the increased prevalence of traditional risk factors. Despite this, the evidence base for the assessment and management of SCD in these patients is limited. This article reviews the current data on underlying risk factors for SCD in patients with ESRD, the role of common medical and device-based therapies for the prevention and treatment of SCD, and the applicability of common methods of risk stratification to patients with ESRD.

Does timing of dialysis in patients with ESRD and acute myocardial infarcts affect morbidity or mortality?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with ESRD have an increased incidence of coronary events with a relatively higher risk for mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We evaluated whether it is safer to delay dialysis in AMI or if delay poses separate risks.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We conducted a retrospective review of 131 long-term hemodialysis patients who had AMI and were admitted between 1997 and 2005 at three New York City municipal hospitals. Patients were separated into three groups on the basis of time between cardiac symptoms and first dialysis (<24 h, 24 to 48 h, and >48 h).

RESULTS

A total of 17 (13%) patients died, 10 (59%) of whom had either hypotension or an arrhythmia during their first cardiac care unit dialysis. Although these groups were comparable in acuity and cardiac status, there were no findings of increased morbidity (26, 36, and 20%, respectively) or mortality (11, 18, and 13%, respectively), despite differences in the timing of each group's dialysis. We found that previous cardiac disease, predialysis K+, DeltaK+ after dialysis, and APACHE scores were significantly higher in patients with peridialysis morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that there is no increased morbidity with early dialysis in AMI, but rather close attention needs to be paid to the rate of decrease in serum potassium in patients with ESRD and their level of acuity when undergoing dialysis.

[Technical advances in haemodialysis]

Survival improvement of our haemodialysis patients is partly due to technologic improvement of the dialysis therapy. High permeability membranes and bicarbonate dialysate were the most relevant of past decades. What are the present technologic innovations that will provide clinical benefit? Acetate-free biofiltration, biofeedback systems, better haemodiafiltration techniques and techniques with adsorption could be part of them.

Hemodialysis-induced left ventricular dysfunction is associated with an increase in ventricular arrhythmias

Conventional hemodialysis results in intradialytic cardiac ischemia in a significant proportion of patients. Segmental myocardial ischemia results in the development of left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities. Sudden death is the most common cause of mortality in hemodialysis patients. This study looked to examine any association between the development of left ventricular regional wall motion and cardiac arrhythmias. Forty established hemodialysis patients had 24-hour Holter recordings, which commenced immediately before a dialysis session. Frequency of isolated ectopy was classified as a percentage of the total beats on the Holter monitor record. Ventricular arrhythmias were stratified according to the Lown classification. Classes 3 and above were taken as complex ventricular arrhythmias. Patients also underwent baseline and intradialytic echocardiography to assess the development of concurrent regional wall motion abnormalities. Premature ventricular complexes and complex ventricular arrhythmias were both more common during hemodialysis than in the subsequent monitored period. Patients who developed regional wall motion abnormalities (n = 27) had significantly more premature ventricular complexes during hemodialysis than afterward (p < 0.001). Patients with ischemic heart disease and left ventricular hypertrophy both had a higher frequency of premature ventricular complexes during hemodialysis than those without (p < 0.03 and p < 0.02, respectively). Cardiac arrhythmias are common in hemodialysis patients. The frequency of premature ventricular complexes is significantly higher during hemodialysis in patients who develop regional wall motion abnormalities and may be related to factors associated with demand ischemia.

Effect of acetate-free biofiltration with a potassium-profiled dialysate on the control of cardiac arrhythmias in patients at risk: a pilot study

Cardiac arrhythmias are a frequent event in chronic hemodialysis patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acetate-free hemofiltration with potassium-profiled dialysate (AFB-K) dialysis compared with constant potassium acetate-free biofiltration (AFB). Twelve patients (mean age 79 years) affected by cardiac arrhythmias or at a high risk for arrhythmia (advanced age, hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, heart valve disease, coronary artery disease, diabetes, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation) participated in a single-center, sequential cohort study. All were treated with hemodialysis 3 times per week, using constant potassium AFB for the first 3 weeks, followed by an AFB-K dialysate for the subsequent 3 weeks. The hemofilter, duration of dialysis, and electrolyte concentration were the same in both treatments. Both AFB-K and constant potassium AFB dialytic techniques were safe and well tolerated. The results of biochemical tests were similar, except for serum potassium levels after 2 hr of dialysis, which were significantly higher in the AFB-K group (4.0 mmol/L) than in the constant potassium AFB group (3.6 mmol/L) (p<0.001). All cardiac variables improved during AFB-K dialysis. There was a significant reduction of postdialysis QT intervals corrected for heart rate in the AFB-K group (448.8 ms) compared with the constant potassium AFB group (456.8 ms) (p=0.039). The severity and mean number of ventricular extasystoles also decreased (163.5 vs. 444.5/24 hr). Potassium profiling during hemodialysis treatment may be beneficial for patients with arrhythmias or at those risk of arrhythmias, particularly those with predialysis hyperkalemia.