Kidney transplantation from older donors: proceed with caution

Impact of donor and recipient age difference on long-term allograft survival after living donor renal transplantation: analysis of 478 cases

INTRODUCTION

Either deceased or living-related renal transplantation constitutes the best therapeutic option for patients with end-stage renal disease. In this retrospective study, an attempt to identify parameters that affect allograft survival in living donor renal transplantation was made.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and July 2012, 478 adult patients received a renal transplant from a living-related donor in our center and their records were retrospectively reviewed in November 2012. Data concerning donor age, recipient age, donor/recipient age difference, donor/recipient gender, and ABO compatibility/incompatibility were recorded and associated with renal allograft survival rate.

RESULTS

Renal allograft survival rate was 96%, 89.5%, and 77.7% in the first, fifth, and 10th yr after transplantation, respectively. Only the difference between donor and recipient age was statistically significant in relation to graft survival. In cases with age difference >13 yr, graft survival rate was lower from the third yr onward.

CONCLUSIONS

Only the age difference between donor and recipient exerts an adverse impact on graft outcome after living donor renal transplantation, whereas donor age, recipient age, donor/recipient gender, and ABO incompatibility do not significantly influence renal allograft survival.

The pathology of chronic allograft dysfunction

Chronic allograft dysfunction is associated with a variety of fibrosing/sclerosing changes in the allograft. Fibrosis is multifactorial, a final pathway following varying types of injury. Using a range of diagnostic criteria, the pathologist can and should define specific lesions enabling identification of pathogenic processes affecting the allograft. Although some cases remain 'interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, no specific cause', specific diagnoses can be made in most cases. Drug toxicity, bacterial or viral infection, hypertension, obstruction, recurrent or de novo renal diseases, and acute and chronic cell- and/or antibody-mediated rejection can be diagnosed in this setting. Of particular concern is a combination of persistent inflammation and fibrosis, which has repeatedly been shown to be correlated with poor graft outcomes. Identification of ongoing activity, and the stage of evolution of fibrosis/sclerosis provides important diagnostic and therapeutic information for patient management. Histological, immunohistological, ultrastructural, and molecular studies may be needed to adequately assess the kidney in the setting of chronic allograft dysfunction. Protocol biopsies may provide diagnostic insights in early stages of late graft deterioration, or even before evident dysfunction develops.