Assessment of a HER2 scoring system for colorectal cancer: results from a validation study

Criteria for assessing evidence for biomarker-targeted therapies in rare cancers-an extrapolation framework

Background

Advances in targeted therapy development and tumor sequencing technology are reclassifying cancers into smaller biomarker-defined diseases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are often impractical in rare diseases, leading to calls for single-arm studies to be sufficient to inform clinical practice based on a strong biological rationale. However, without RCTs, favorable outcomes are often attributed to therapy but may be due to a more indolent disease course or other biases. When the clinical benefit of targeted therapy in a common cancer is established in RCTs, this benefit may extend to rarer cancers sharing the same biomarker. However, careful consideration of the appropriateness of extending the existing trial evidence beyond specific cancer types is required. A framework for extrapolating evidence for biomarker-targeted therapies to rare cancers is needed to support transparent decision-making.

Objectives

To construct a framework outlining the breadth of criteria essential for extrapolating evidence for a biomarker-targeted therapy generated from RCTs in common cancers to different rare cancers sharing the same biomarker.

Design

A series of questions articulating essential criteria for extrapolation.

Methods

The framework was developed from the core topics for extrapolation identified from a previous scoping review of methodological guidance. Principles for extrapolation outlined in guidance documents from the European Medicines Agency, the US Food and Drug Administration, and Australia's Medical Services Advisory Committee were incorporated.

Results

We propose a framework for assessing key assumptions of similarity of the disease and treatment outcomes between the common and rare cancer for five essential components: prognosis of the biomarker-defined cancer, biomarker test analytical validity, biomarker actionability, treatment efficacy, and safety. Knowledge gaps identified can be used to prioritize future studies.

Conclusion

This framework will allow systematic assessment, standardize regulatory, reimbursement and clinical decision-making, and facilitate transparent discussions between key stakeholders in drug assessment for rare biomarker-defined cancers.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-positive advanced colorectal cancer (DESTINY-CRC02): primary results from a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Trastuzumab deruxtecan has shown encouraging activity in patients with treatment-refractory HER2-positive, RAS wild-type and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Dose optimisation and further antitumour assessments in patients with RAS mutations and those with previous anti-HER2 therapy are warranted. We aimed to evaluate two doses of trastuzumab deruxtecan (5·4 mg/kg and 6·4 mg/kg) to establish the recommended dose in patients with pretreated HER2-positive, RAS wild-type or mutant metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

DESTINY-CRC02 was a multicentre, randomised, two-stage, two-arm, phase 2 study done in 53 research hospitals and medical centres in Australia, Belgium, France, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, the UK, and the USA. Eligible patients were aged 18 years and older or 20 years and older (depending on region) with pretreated pathologically documented, unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic HER2-positive, and RAS wild-type or mutant colorectal cancer. Patients were required to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 and have received previous chemotherapy, and anti-EGFR, anti-VEGF, or anti-PD-L1 therapy, if clinically indicated. In stage 1, patients were randomly assigned (1:1), via a secure interactive response technology system, to receive 5·4 mg/kg or 6·4 mg/kg trastuzumab deruxtecan administered intravenously every 21 days. Stratification factors were ECOG performance status, HER2 status, and RAS status. In stage 2, patients were assigned into the 5·4 mg/kg treatment group only. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate by blinded independent central review, assessed in all patients for whom treatment was assigned (full analysis set). Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04744831, and is ongoing (not recruiting).

FINDINGS

Between March 5, 2021, and March 29, 2022, 135 patients were centrally screened, 122 of whom were enrolled. In stage 1, 40 patients each were randomly assigned to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan 5·4 mg/kg and 6·4 mg/kg. In stage 2, an additional 42 patients were enrolled in the 5·4 mg/kg group. 64 (52%) participants were male and 58 (48%) were female. The median duration of follow-up was 8·9 months (IQR 6·7-10·5) in the 5·4 mg/kg group and 10·3 months (5·9-12·7) in the 6·4 mg/kg group. The confirmed objective response rate by blinded independent central review was 37·8% (31/82 [95% CI 27·3-49·2]) in the 5·4 mg/kg group and 27·5% (11/40 [14·6-43·9]) in the 6·4 mg/kg group. 34 (41%) of 83 patients in the 5·4 mg/kg group and 19 (49%) of 39 in the 6·4 mg/kg group had grade 3 or worse drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events. The most common grade 3 or worse drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were neutrophil count decreased (13 [16%] of 83 patients), anaemia (six [7%]), nausea (six [7%]), and white blood cell count decreased (five [6%]) in the 5·4 mg/kg group; and were neutrophil count decreased (10 [26%] of 39 patients), anaemia (eight [21%]), platelet count decreased (four [10%]), and white blood cell count decreased (four [10%]) in the 6·4 mg/kg group. Drug-related serious adverse events occurred in 11 (13%) of 83 patients in the 5·4 mg/kg group and six (15%) of 39 patients in the 6·4 mg/kg group; the most common in the 5·4 mg/kg group was nausea (three [4%] patients) and the most common in the 6·4 mg/kg group were fatigue (two [5%] patients), neutropenia (two [5%]), and thrombocytopenia (two [5%]). A drug-related treatment-emergent adverse event related to death occurred in one (1%) patient in the 5·4 mg/kg group (due to hepatic failure). Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis events were observed in seven (8%) patients in the 5·4 mg/kg group (all grade 1 or 2) and in five (13%) patients in the 6·4 mg/kg group (four grade 1 or 2; one grade 5).

INTERPRETATION

The promising antitumour activity and favourable safety profile support trastuzumab deruxtecan 5·4 mg/kg as the optimal single-agent dose for patients with pretreated HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer, including those with RAS mutations, previous anti-HER2 therapy, or both.

FUNDING

Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca.

HER2-targeted therapies beyond breast cancer - an update

The receptor tyrosine-kinase HER2 (also known as ErbB2) is a well-established therapeutic target in patients with breast or gastric cancer selected on the basis of HER2 overexpression on immunohistochemistry and/or ERBB2 amplification on in situ hybridization. With advances in cancer molecular profiling and increased implementation of precision medicine approaches into oncology practice, actionable HER2 alterations in solid tumours have expanded to include ERBB2 mutations in addition to traditional HER2 overexpression and ERBB2 amplification. These various HER2 alterations can be found in solid tumour types beyond breast and gastric cancer, although few HER2-targeted therapeutic options have been established for the other tumour types. Nevertheless, during the 5 years since our previous Review on this topic was published in this journal, obvious and fruitful progress in the development of HER2-targeted therapies has been made, including new disease indications, innovative drugs with diverse mechanisms of action and novel frameworks for approval by regulatory authorities. These advances have culminated in the recent histology-agnostic approval of the anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan for patients with HER2-overexpressing solid tumours. In this new Review, we provide an update on the current development landscape of HER2-targeted therapies beyond breast cancer, as well as anticipated future HER2-directed treatment strategies to overcome resistance and thereby improve efficacy and patient outcomes.

HER-2 directed therapies across gastrointestinal tract cancers - A new frontier

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are common and in the metastatic setting they have a poor prognosis. The current mainstay of treatment of GI cancers is chemotherapy; however, the biomarker-directed treatment landscape is evolving. HER-2 is overexpressed in a portion of GI cancers and is an emerging target for therapy, with recent FDA tumor agnostic approval for trastuzumab deruxtecan. Testing for HER-2 expression is not standardized across GI cancers, methodology requires further optimization and standardization as HER-2 targeted therapy emerges into the treatment landscape. There is established rationale for use of HER-2 targeted therapy in first line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, and emerging evidence with variable benefit in bile duct, pancreatic and colorectal cancers.

Exploring Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. While immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly improved patient outcomes, their effectiveness is mostly limited to tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI-H/dMMR) or an increased tumor mutational burden, which comprise 10% of cases. Advancing personalized medicine in CRC hinges on identifying predictive biomarkers to guide treatment decisions. This comprehensive review examines established tissue markers such as KRAS and HER2, highlighting their roles in resistance to anti-EGFR agents and discussing advances in targeted therapies for these markers. Additionally, this review summarizes encouraging data on promising therapeutic targets and highlights the clinical utility of liquid biopsies. By synthesizing current evidence and identifying knowledge gaps, this review provides clinicians and researchers with a contemporary understanding of the biomarker landscape in CRC. Finally, the review examines future directions and challenges in translating promising biomarkers into clinical practice, with the goal of enhancing personalized medicine approaches for colorectal cancer patients.

Enhanced anti-tumor effects by combination of tucatinib and radiation in HER2-overexpressing human cancer cell lines

BACKGROUND

Tucatinib (TUC), a HER2-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the first targeted drug demonstrating intracranial efficacy and significantly prolonged survival in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastases. Current treatments for brain metastases often include radiotherapy, but little is known about the effects of combination treatment with TUC. Therefore, we examined the combined effects of irradiation and TUC in human HER2-overexpressing BC, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines. For the latter two, a standard therapy successfully targeting HER2 is yet to be established.

METHODS

Nine HER2-overexpressing (BC: BT474, ZR7530, HCC1954; CRC: LS411N, DLD1, COLO201; NSCLC: DV90, NCI-H1781) and three control cell lines (BC: MCF7, HCC38; NSCLC: NCI-H2030) were examined. WST-1 assay (metabolic activity), BrdU ELISA (proliferation), γH2AX assay (DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), Annexin V assay (apoptosis), and clonogenic assay (clonogenicity) were performed after treatment with TUC and/or irradiation (IR). The relevance of the treatment sequence was analyzed exemplarily.

RESULTS

In BC, combinatorial treatment with TUC and IR significantly decreased metabolic activity, cell proliferation, clonogenicity and enhanced apoptotis compared to IR alone, whereby cell line-specific differences occurred. In the PI3KCA-mutated HCC1954 cell line, addition of alpelisib (ALP) further decreased clonogenicity. TUC delayed the repair of IR-induced DNA damage but did not induce DSB itself. Investigation of treatment sequence indicated a benefit of IR before TUC versus IR after TUC. Also in CRC and NSCLC, the combination led to a stronger inhibition of metabolic activity, proliferation, and clonogenic survival (only in NSCLC) than IR alone, whereby about 10-fold higher concentrations of TUC had to be applied than in BC to induce significant changes.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that combination of TUC and IR could be more effective than single treatment strategies for BC. Thereby, treatment sequence seems to be an important factor. The lower sensitivity to TUC in NSCLC and particularly in CRC (compared to BC) implicates, that tumor promotion there might be less HER2-related. Combination with inhibitors of other driver mutations may aid in overcoming partial TUC resistance. These findings are of high relevance to improve long-time prognosis especially in brain-metastasized situations given the intracranial activity of TUC.

HER2 evaluation for clinical decision making in human solid tumours: pearls and pitfalls

The significant clinical benefits of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapeutic agents have revolutionized the clinical treatment landscape in a variety of human solid tumours. Accordingly, accurate evaluation of HER2 status in these different tumour types is critical for clinical decision making to select appropriate patients who may benefit from life-saving HER2-targeted therapies. HER2 biomarker scoring criteria is different in different organ systems, and close adherence to the corresponding HER2 biomarker testing guidelines and their updates, if available, is essential for accurate evaluation. In addition, knowing the unusual patterns of HER2 expression is also important to avoid inaccurate evaluation. In this review, we discuss the key considerations when evaluating HER2 status in solid tumours for clinical decision making, including tissue handling and preparation for HER2 biomarker testing, as well as pathologist's readout of HER2 testing results in breast carcinomas, gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas, colorectal adenocarcinomas, gynaecologic carcinomas, and non-small cell lung carcinomas.

Temporal and spatial heterogeneity of HER2 status in metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

HER2-targeted therapies have recently emerged as an option in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) overexpressing HER2. However, data regarding HER2 status in primary CRC and its corresponding liver metastases are limited, potentially influencing clinical decisions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the HER2 status in primary CRC and paired liver metastases.

METHODS

Patients with mCRC who were operated from their primary colorectal cancer and their corresponding synchronous or metachronous liver metastases, in the digestive surgery department of Besançon University Hospital, between April 1999 and October 2021, were included. Tissue microarrays were constructed from matched primary CRC and liver metastastic tissue samples. HER2 status was assessed by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization according to Valtorta's criteria.

RESULTS

A series of 108 paired primary CRC and liver metastases, including a series of multiple liver metastases originating from the same patients (n = 24), were assessed. Among the primary CRC, 89 (82.4%), 17 (15.8%) and 2 (1.8%) cases were scored 0, 1 + and 2 + respectively. In liver metastases, 99 (91.7%), 7 (6.5%) and 2 (1.8%) were scored 0, 1 + and 2, respectively. Overall, there was a 19% discrepancy rate in HER2 status between primary CRC and metastases, which increased to 21% in cases with multiple synchronous or metachronous liver metastases in a given patient. No significant difference was found between metachronous and synchronous metastases regarding the HER2 status (p = 0.237).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the temporal and spatial heterogeneity of HER2 status between primary CRC and corresponding liver metastases. These findings raise the question of a sequential evaluation of the HER2 status during disease progression, to provide the most suitable treatment strategy.

HER2 Gene Expression Levels Are Predictive and Prognostic in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Enrolled in CALGB/SWOG 80405

PURPOSE

The phase III Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB)/SWOG 80405 trial found no difference in overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy in combination with either bevacizumab or cetuximab. We investigated the potential prognostic and predictive value of HER2 amplification and gene expression using next-generation sequencing (NGS) and NanoString data.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Primary tumor DNA from 559 patients was profiled for HER2 amplification by NGS (FoundationOne CDx). Tumor tissue from 925 patients was tested for NanoString gene expression using an 800-gene panel. OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were the time-to-event end points.

RESULTS

High HER2 expression (dichotomized at median) was associated with longer PFS (11.6 v 10 months, P = .012) and OS (32 v 25.3 months, P = .033), independent of treatment. An OS benefit for cetuximab versus bevacizumab was observed in the high HER2 expression group (P = .02), whereas a worse PFS for cetuximab was seen in the low-expression group (P = .019). When modeled as a continuous variable, increased HER2 expression was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.75 to 0.93]; adjusted P = .0007) and PFS (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.74 to 0.91]; adjusted P = .0002), reaching a plateau effect after the median. In patients with HER2 expression lower than median, treatment with cetuximab was associated with worse PFS (HR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.12 to 1.71]; adjusted P = .0027) and OS (HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.59]; adjusted P = .03) compared with that with bevacizumab. A significant interaction between HER2 expression and the treatment arm was observed for OS (Pintx = .017), PFS (Pintx = .048), and objective response rate (Pintx = .001).

CONCLUSION

HER2 gene expression was prognostic and predictive in CALGB/SWOG 80405. HER2 tumor expression may inform treatment selection for patients with low HER2 favoring bevacizumab- versus cetuximab-based therapies.

Principles of Analytic Validation of Immunohistochemical Assays: Guideline Update

CONTEXT.—

In 2014, the College of American Pathologists developed an evidence-based guideline to address analytic validation of immunohistochemical assays. Fourteen recommendations were offered. Per the National Academy of Medicine standards for developing trustworthy guidelines, guidelines should be updated when new evidence suggests modifications.

OBJECTIVE.—

To assess evidence published since the release of the original guideline and develop updated evidence-based recommendations.

DESIGN.—

The College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the literature and update the original guideline recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS.—

Two strong recommendations, 1 conditional recommendation, and 12 good practice statements are offered in this updated guideline. They address analytic validation or verification of predictive and nonpredictive assays, and recommended revalidation procedures following changes in assay conditions.

CONCLUSIONS.—

While many of the original guideline statements remain similar, new recommendations address analytic validation of assays with distinct scoring systems, such as programmed death receptor-1 and analytic verification of US Food and Drug Administration approved/cleared assays; more specific guidance is offered for validating immunohistochemistry performed on cytology specimens.

Epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in colorectal cancer: emerging strategies for precision therapy

INTRODUCTION

The global prevalence of colorectal cancer highlights the need to enhance treatment strategies for improved patient outcomes. The pivotal role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in regulating cellular processes for this disease pinpoints its value as a therapeutic target, despite the emergence of resistance mechanisms over time.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the clinical evidence supporting the use of EGFR inhibitors in molecularly-selected patients based on molecular characteristics (notably BRAF V600E and KRAS G12C) including combination approaches targeting different points in in the signaling pathway, as well as strategies such as EGFR inhibitor rechallenge. The role of HER2 inhibitors and emerging approaches such as bispecific antibodies are also reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Recently, inhibitors targeting the KRAS G12C variant have emerged, albeit with modest monotherapy activity compared to other tumor types, emphasizing the influence of histologic origins on the EGFR signaling pathway. Integration of EGFR inhibitors into precision medicine has facilitated tailored therapies addressing resistance mechanisms. Patient selection for EGFR inhibitor rechallenge guided by ctDNA findings is crucial, with ongoing investigations exploring novel combinations to enhance EGFR blockade, highlighting the transformative potential of precision medicine in shaping the future of mCRC treatment toward personalized and targeted approaches.

Evaluation of immune infiltrate according to the HER2 status in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In colorectal cancer (CRC), HER2 targeting is a promising treatment and immune infiltrate is an important area of research and strategy. Data regarding HER2 status and immune infiltrate are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the immune infiltrate between HER2 amplified and non-amplified categories in proficient MisMatchRepair (pMMR)/microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC.

METHODS

HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization were performed in a retrospective series of 654 CRC. Lymphocyte infiltrate was analysed by anti-CD3, CD8 and CD4 IHC and evaluated digitally using QuPath software.

RESULTS

Among the 654 CRC, we first observed a decreased CD3+ and CD8+ infiltrate between HER2 amplified (all IHC 3+ except one 2+) and non-amplified HER2 2+ IHC CRC (p = 0.059 and 0.072 respectively). A supplementary analysis of 258 pMMR/MSS CRC from the previous cohort, displaying all the IHC scores (0, 1+, 2+, 3+), showed a lower CD3+ infiltrate between HER2 amplified versus HER2 0 (p = 0.002), 1+ (p = 0.088) and non-amplified 2+ (p = 0.081) IHC cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our original findings suggest that in pMMR/MSS CRC, the immune infiltrate is reduced in HER2 amplified versus other HER2 categories. These data might be useful for future strategies combining anti-HER2 treatments and immune checkpoint inhibitors and need to be confirmed in larger CRC cohorts.

HER2 targeted therapy in colorectal Cancer: Current landscape and future directions

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common causes of tumor-related deaths globally. Despite recent improvements in the comprehensive therapy of malignancy, metastatic CRC continues to have a poor prognosis. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is an established oncogenic driver, which is successfully targeted for breast and gastric cancers. Approximately 5% of CRC patients carry somatic HER2 mutations or gene amplification. In 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration have approved trastuzumab and pertuzumab in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic CRC. This approval marked a significant milestone in the treatment of CRC, as HER2-positive patients now have access to targeted therapies that can improve their outcomes. Yet, assessment for HER2 overexpression/ amplification in CRC has not been standardized. The resistance mechanisms to anti-HER2 therapy have been not clearly investigated in CRC. Although many unknowns remain, an improved understanding of these anti-HER2 agents will be essential for advanced CRC. In this review, we provide an overview of the role of HER2 in CRC as an oncogenic driver, a prognostic and predictive biomarker, and a clinically actionable target, as well as the current progress and challenges in the field.

HER2 expression and genOmic characterization of rESected brain metastases from colorectal cancer: the HEROES study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about prognostic factors of brain metastases (BM) from colorectal cancer (CRC). HER2 amplification/overexpression (HER2+) was previously described; its impact on prognosis remains uncertain.

METHODS

In the translational study HEROES, extensive molecular analysis was performed on primary CRC (prCRC) and their matched resected BM by means of NGS comprehensive genomic profiling and HER2 status as assessed by immunohistochemical/ in situ hybridization. Count of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) was also performed.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

to describe the molecular landscape of paired BM/prCRC.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES

to search for new prognostic biomarkers of outcome after BM resection: intracranial-only Progression-Free Survival (BM-iPFS), Progression-Free Survival (BM-PFS), and Overall Survival (BM-OS).

RESULTS

Out of 22 patients having paired samples of prCRC and BM, HER2+ was found on 4 (18%) BM, 3 (75%) of which also HER2+ in matched prCRC. Lower tumour mutation burden (HR 3.08; 95%CI 1.06-8.93; p = 0.0386) and HER2-negative BM (HER2neg) (HR 7.75;95%CI 1.97-30.40; p = 0.0033) were associated with longer BM-iPFS; HER2neg BM (HR 3.44; 95%CI 1.03-11.53; p = 0.0449) and KRASmut BM (HR 0.31; 95%CI 0.12-0.80; p = 0.0153) conferred longer BM-PFS. Longer BM-OS was found in pts with TILs-enriched (≥1.6/HPF) BM (HR 0.11; 95%CI0.01-0.91; p = 0.0403).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows HER2+ enrichment in both BM and their prCRC. TILs-enriched BM conferred better BM-OS.

HER2-Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Targeted treatment strategies are available for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (amplified and/or overexpressed) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and HER2 testing is indicated in patients with mCRC. At present, standard of care first-line treatment for those with HER2-positive mCRC remains chemotherapy in combination with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors or bevacizumab, depending on RAS/BRAF mutational status and tumor sidedness. HER2-targeted agents should be considered for those with RAS/BRAF wild-type disease in subsequent-line treatment and in first-line treatment for patients not appropriate for intensive therapy. While the choice of anti-HER2 therapy is empiric given lack of head-to-head comparisons, the combination of trastuzumab plus tucatinib has received FDA accelerated approval for use in this setting and is generally the authors' preference. Trastuzumab plus lapatinib, trastuzumab plus pertuzumab, and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) also have evidence of efficacy in this setting. As T-DXd has demonstrated activity following treatment with other HER2-targeted regimens and carries an increased risk of high-grade toxicities, the authors favor reserving it for use after progression on prior anti-HER2 therapy. HER2-targeted therapies that inhibit signal transduction appear to have limited activity in those with RAS mutations, including trastuzumab-containing regimens. However, the antibody drug conjugate T-DXd has some data showing efficacy in this setting, and the authors would consider T-DXd in subsequent-line therapy for HER2-positive, RAS-mutated mCRC. Several areas of uncertainty remain regarding how to best utilize HER2-targeted therapies in mCRC. These include the optimal sequence of anti-HER2 therapies with chemotherapy and anti-EGFR therapies, the optimal combination partners for anti-HER2 therapies, and the incorporation of predictive biomarkers to guide use of anti-HER2 therapies. Results of ongoing studies may thus alter the treatment paradigm above in the coming years.

RAS/RAF Comutation and ERBB2 Copy Number Modulates HER2 Heterogeneity and Responsiveness to HER2-directed Therapy in Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE

ERBB2-amplified colorectal cancer is a distinct molecular subtype with expanding treatments. Implications of concurrent oncogenic RAS/RAF alterations are not known.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Dana-Farber and Foundation Medicine Inc. Colorectal cancer cohorts with genomic profiling were used to identify ERBB2-amplified cases [Dana-Farber, n = 47/2,729 (1.7%); FMI, n = 1857/49,839 (3.7%)]. Outcomes of patients receiving HER2-directed therapies are reported (Dana-Farber, n = 9; Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine clinicogenomic database, FH-FMI CGDB, n = 38). Multisite HER2 IHC and genomic profiling were performed to understand HER2 intratumoral and interlesional heterogeneity. The impact of concurrent RAS comutations on the effectiveness of HER2-directed therapies were studied in isogenic colorectal cancer cell lines and xenografts.

RESULTS

ERBB2 amplifications are enriched in left-sided colorectal cancer. Twenty percent of ERBB2-amplified colorectal cancers have co-occurring oncogenic RAS/RAF alterations. While RAS/RAF WT colorectal cancers typically have clonal ERBB2 amplification, colorectal cancers with co-occurring RAS/RAF alterations have lower level ERRB2 amplification, higher intratumoral heterogeneity, and interlesional ERBB2 discordance. These distinct genomic patterns lead to differential responsiveness and patterns of resistance to HER2-directed therapy. ERBB2-amplified colorectal cancer with RAS/RAF alterations are resistant to trastuzumab-based combinations, such as trastuzumab/tucatinib, but retain sensitivity to trastuzumab deruxtecan in in vitro and murine models. Trastuzumab deruxtecan shows clinical efficacy in cases with high-level ERBB2-amplified RAS/RAF coaltered colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-occurring RAS/RAF alterations define a unique subtype of ERBB2-amplified colorectal cancer that has increased intratumoral heterogeneity, interlesional discordance, and resistance to trastuzumab-based combinations. Further examination of trastuzumab deruxtecan in this previously understudied cohort of ERBB2-amplified colorectal cancer is warranted.

Efficacy of Pyrotinib With/Without Trastuzumab in Treatment-Refractory, HER2-Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Result From a Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a promising therapeutic target in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib alone or pyrotinib with trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive mCRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective observational study, patients with HER2 positive, Ras Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (RAS) wild type mCRC who received at least one standard treatment of palliative chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients were treated with oral pyrotinib alone or pyrotinib with trastuzumab. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), confirmed objective response rate (ORR), and safety. This trial is registered with chitcr.org, number ChiCTR2100046381.

RESULTS

From February 15, 2021, to January 10, 2023, 32 patients were enrolled in this study. Twenty (62.5%) patients were treated with pyrotinib, while 12 (37.5%) received pyrotinib and trastuzumab. As of June 24, 2023, with a median follow-up of 11.0 months, the median PFS was 5.7 months (95%CI 4.5-10.2), while OS was not evaluable (NE), ORR and disease control rate (DCR were 34.4% and 87.5%. Patients' PFS in the pyrotinib plus trastuzumab subgroup and pyrotinib monotherapy group were 8.6 and 5.5 months, OS was not evaluable (NE) and 10.9 months, ORR was 50.0% and 25.0%, respectively. Most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade 1-2, diarrhea was the most frequent TRAE (81.3%, 26/32). Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 11 patients: 9 for diarrhea, 1 for nausea, and 1 for oral mucositis.

CONCLUSION

Pyrotinib with or without trastuzumab showed promising anti-tumor activity and acceptable toxicities in treatment-refractory, HER2-positive mCRC.

HER2-targeted therapies in cancer: a systematic review

Abnormal alterations in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2, neu, and erbB2) are associated with the development of many tumors. It is currently a crucial treatment for multiple cancers. Advanced in molecular biology and further exploration of the HER2-mediated pathway have promoted the development of medicine design and combination drug regimens. An increasing number of HER2-targeted drugs including specific monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The emergence of ADCs, has significantly transformed the treatment landscape for various tumors, such as breast, gastric, and bladder cancer. Classic monoclonal antibodies and novel TKIs have not only demonstrated remarkable efficacy, but also expanded their indications, with ADCs in particular exhibiting profound clinical applications. Moreover the concept of low HER2 expression signifies a breakthrough in HER2-targeted therapy, indicating that an increasing number of tumors and patients will benefit from this approach. This article, provides a comprehensive review of the underlying mechanism of action, representative drugs, corresponding clinical trials, recent advancements, and future research directions pertaining to HER2-targeted therapy.

Targeting HER2 heterogeneity in breast and gastrointestinal cancers

About 20% of breast and gastric cancers and 3% of colorectal carcinomas overexpress the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and are sensitive to HER2-directed agents. The expression of HER2 may differ within the same tumoral lesion (spatial intralesional heterogeneity), from different tumor locations (spatial interlesional heterogeneity), and throughout treatments (temporal heterogeneity). Spatial and temporal heterogeneity may impact on response and resistance to HER2-targeting agents and its prevalence and predictive role changes across HER2-overexpressing solid tumors. Therefore, the definition and the characterization of HER2 heterogeneity pose many challenges and its implementation as a reproducible predictive biomarker would help in guiding treatment modulation.

Cetuximab as a Key Partner in Personalized Targeted Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Cetuximab, a chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has revolutionized personalized treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. This review highlights the mechanism of action, characteristics, and optimal indications for cetuximab in mCRC. Cetuximab has emerged as a pivotal partner for novel therapies in specific molecular subgroups, including BRAF V600E, KRAS G12C, and HER2-altered mCRC. Combining cetuximab with immunotherapy and other targeted agents further expands the therapeutic landscape, offering renewed hope for mCRC patients who face the development of resistance to conventional therapies. Ongoing clinical trials have continued to uncover innovative cetuximab-based treatment strategies, promising a brighter future for mCRC patients. This review provides a comprehensive overview of cetuximab's role and its evolving importance in personalized targeted therapy of mCRC patients, offering valuable insights into the evolving landscape of colorectal cancer treatment.

Treatment options for HER2-expressing colorectal cancer: updates and recent approvals

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Approximately 3-5% of colorectal tumors harbor human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) amplification which is associated with a higher incidence of intracranial metastasis and overall worse outcomes. In the setting of refractory metastatic RAS wild-type tumors, evidence supports the use of various HER2-blocking agents, including monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and novel antibody-drug conjugates. With a number of relatively active agents clinically available and even more in development, it is crucial for clinicians to familiarize themselves with the mechanisms of action, efficacy data, and safety profiles of these treatments. In this review, we aim to summarize key findings from past and ongoing trials with anti-HER2 agents in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Molecular Targeting of the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER2) Genes across Various Cancers

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) belongs to the ErbB family, a group of four transmembrane glycoproteins with tyrosine kinase activity, all structurally related to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). These tyrosine kinases are involved in the transmission of cellular signals controlling normal cell growth and differentiation. If this transmission goes awry, it can lead to dysregulated growth of the cell. HER2 specifically can be implicated in the pathogenesis of at least eight malignancies. HER2 positivity quickly became a well-characterized indicator of aggressiveness and poor prognosis, with high rates of disease progression and mortality. After realizing the implication of HER2, it first became investigated as a target for treatment in breast cancer, and later expanded to areas of research in other cancer types. To this day, the most therapeutic advancements of anti-HER2 therapy have been in breast cancer; however, there have been strong advancements made in the incorporation of anti-HER2 therapy in other cancer types as well. This comprehensive review dissects HER2 to its core, incorporating the most up to date information. The topics touched upon are discussed in detail and up to 200 published sources from the most highly recognized journals have been integrated. The importance of knowing about HER2 is exemplified by the groundbreaking advancements that have been made, and the change in treatment plans it has brought to the oncological world in the last twenty years. Since its groundbreaking discovery there have been significant breakthroughs in knowledge regarding the actual receptor, the receptors biology, its mechanism of action, and advancements in tests to detect HER2 and significant strides on how to best incorporate targeted treatment. Due to the success of this field thus far, the review concludes by discussing the future of novel anti-HER2 therapy currently in development that everyone should be aware of.

Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of HER2 amplification, overexpression, and positivity in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death globally. Recent clinical trials suggest an emerging role for HER2 as a potential clinically relevant biomarker in CRC. Testing for HER2 in CRC is not standard practice; consequently, the prevalence of HER2 positivity (HER2+) in patients with CRC remains uncertain.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted to generate estimates of proportions of patients with CRC with HER2 overexpression or HER2 amplification and HER2+ (either overexpression or amplification), overall and in patients with rat sarcoma virus (RAS) wild-type cancer. HER2+ was defined as 1) immunohistochemistry with a score of 3+, 2) immunohistochemistry with a score of 2+ and in situ hybridization+, or 3) next-generation sequencing positive.

RESULTS

Of 224 studies identified with information on HER2 in CRC, 52 studies used a US Food and Drug Administration-approved assay and were selected for further analysis. Estimated HER2+ rate was 4.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.4% to 5.0%) overall (n = 17 589). HER2+ rates were statistically higher in RAS wild-type (6.1%, 95% CI = 5.4% to 6.9%) vs RAS mutant CRC (1.1%, 95% CI = 0.3% to 4.4%; P < .0001). Despite limited clinical information, we confirmed enrichment of HER2+ CRC in patients with microsatellite stable and left-sided CRC.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis provides an estimate of HER2+ CRC and confirms enrichment of HER2 in microsatellite stable, left-sided, RAS wild-type CRC tumors. Our work is important given the recently described clinical efficacy of HER2-targeted therapies in HER2+ CRC and informs strategies for incorporation of HER2 testing into standard of care.

Time to Deliver on Promises: The Role of ERBB2 Alterations as Treatment Options for Colorectal Cancer Patients in the Era of Precision Oncology

Receptor tyrosine kinase erythroblastic oncogene B2 (ERBB2), also known as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), represents an oncogenic driver and has been effectively targeted in breast and gastric cancer. Recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS) discovered ERBB2 as a promising therapeutic target in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), where it is altered in 3-5% of patients, but no therapies are currently approved for this use. Herein, we present the experience of a single center in diagnosing actionable genetic ERBB2 alterations using NGS and utilizing the latest therapeutic options. Between October 2019 and December 2022, a total of 107 patients with advanced CRC underwent molecular analysis, revealing actionable ERBB2 mutations in two patients and ERBB2 amplifications in two other patients. These findings correlated with immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Of these four patients, two were treated with trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd). We present two exemplary cases of patients with actionable ERBB2 alterations to demonstrate the effectiveness of T-DXd in heavily pretreated ERBB2-positive mCRC patients and the need for early molecular profiling. To fully exploit the potential of this promising treatment, earlier molecular profiling and the initiation of targeted therapies are essential.

Pathologic Evaluation of Therapeutic Biomarkers in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma

Molecular testing is an essential component of the pathologic evaluation of colorectal carcinoma providing diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive therapeutic information. Mismatch repair status evaluation is required for all tumors. Advanced and metastatic tumors also require determination of tumor mutational burden, KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutation status, ERBB2 amplification status, and NTRK and RET gene rearrangement status to guide therapy. Multiple assays, including immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability testing, MLH1 promoter methylation, and next-generation sequencing, are typically needed. Pathologists must be aware of these requirements to optimally triage tissue. Advances in colorectal cancer molecular diagnostics will continue to drive refinements in colorectal cancer personalized therapy.

An Update on the Role of Immunohistochemistry in the Evaluation of Pancreatic/Liver/Gastrointestinal Luminal Tract Disorders

CONTEXT.—

Immunohistochemistry serves as an ancillary diagnostic tool for a wide variety of neoplastic and nonneoplastic disorders, including infections, workup of inflammatory conditions, and subtyping neoplasms of the pancreas/liver/gastrointestinal luminal tract. In addition, immunohistochemistry is also used to detect a variety of prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers for carcinomas of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract.

OBJECTIVE.—

To highlight an update on the role of immunohistochemistry in the evaluation of pancreatic/liver/gastrointestinal luminal tract disorders.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review and authors' research data and personal practice experience were used.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool, assisting in the diagnosis of problematic tumors and benign lesions of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract, and also in the prediction of prognosis and therapeutic response for carcinomas of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract.

Opportunities and Challenges for a Histology-Agnostic Utilization of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review delves into the prospects and challenges offered by a potential pan-histological utilization of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

The HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) T-DXd has shown broad activity across cancer types, with current indications for patients with biomarker-selected breast, gastric, and non-small-cell lung cancer and relevant activity observed in multiple histology-specific trials. Moreover, two recently reported phase 2 trials (DESTINY-Pantumor02 and HERALD) have supported the potential for a pan-cancer utilization of this ADC in patients with advanced cancers expressing HER2 or with HER2 amplifications. By improving the delivery of cytotoxic chemotherapy, ADCs have allowed for meaningful clinical advantages in broad populations of cancer patients, often leading to survival advantages over conventional chemotherapy. Notably, the broad spectrum of activity of certain ADCs has led to the hypothesis of a histology-agnostic utilization based on detecting specific biomarkers, similar to what is already established for certain targeted treatments and immunotherapy. To date, T-DXd has shown the broadest activity across cancer types, with current approvals in breast, gastric, and lung cancer, and relevant antitumor activity observed in a multiplicity of additional cancer types. The optimization of the drug dose, identification of predictive biomarkers, and clarification of mechanisms of resistance will be critical steps in view of a pan-histological expansion in the use of T-DXd.

New treatment options for metastatic HER2-low breast cancer : Consequences for histopathological diagnosis

The overexpression of HER2 in breast cancer is a classic example for molecular targeted therapy, and it has been shown that classical anti-HER2 therapeutics were only effective in patients with HER2 overexpressing tumors. Therefore, in recent decades, pathologists have been focused on the reliable identification of HER2 overexpressing tumors. Based on the results of recent clinical trials in metastatic breast cancer with antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), this diagnostic strategy for evaluation of HER2 is currently changing. It has been shown that the ADC trastuzumab-deruxtecan is effective not only against tumors with classical HER2 overexpression, but also against HER2-low tumors. These clinical trial results lead to a paradigm shift in the treatment of patients whose tumours were previously classified as HER2 negative. In addition to the identification of HER2 (score 3+) overexpressing tumors, it is necessary to identify HER2-low expressing tumors (defined as an immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 1+ or IHC2+ with negative in situ hybridization).Due to the therapeutic consequences, it is important to quickly adapt the diagnostic workup and reporting to the new requirements. In addition, the new therapeutic options for anti-HER2 therapy lead to new challenges for standardization as well as to new scientific questions for the characterization of tumors with low HER2 expression.

HER-2 Expression in Colorectal Cancer and Its Correlation with Immune Cell Infiltration

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the effect of increased HER-2 expression on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and determine its impact on the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients; Methods: HER-2, CD4, CD8, CD19, LY6G, CD56, CD68, CD11b, and EpCam expression in CRC tissues and adjacent paracancerous tissues were assessed using multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemical staining. The correlation between HER-2 expression and the number of TILs in CRC tissues was analyzed. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze survival outcomes; Results: The expression of HER-2 in tumor tissues was higher than that in paracancerous tissues (1.31 ± 0.45 vs. 0.86 ± 0.20, p < 0.05). Additionally, there was an increase in the numbers of CD4+, CD8+, CD19+, and CD68+ cells in CRC tissues (14.11 ± 1.10 vs. 3.40 ± 0.18, p < 0.005; 0.16 ± 0.12 vs. 0.04 ± 0.04, p < 0.005; 0.71 ± 0.46 vs. 0.25 ± 0.13, p < 0.0005; 0.27 ± 0.24 vs. 0.03 ± 0.11, p < 0.05). An increase in HER-2 expression was positively correlated with an increase in CD4, CD8, and CD19 (p < 0.0001). In HER-2-positive CRC tissues, CD68 expression was increased (0.80 ± 0.55 vs. 0.25 ± 0.22, p < 0.05). In HER-2-upregulated CRC tissues, CD4, CD8, CD19, CD68, CD11b, Ly6G, and CD56 expressions were elevated (0.70 ± 0.37 vs. 0.32 ± 0.17, p = 0.03; 0.22 ± 0.13 vs. 0.09 ± 0.06, p = 0.03; 0.31 ± 0.19 vs. 0.12 ± 0.08, p = 0.02; 1.05 ± 0.62 vs. 0.43 ± 0.21, p < 0.01; 1.34 ± 0.81 vs. 0.53 ± 0.23, p < 0.01; 0.50 ± 0.31 vs. 0.19 ± 0.10, p < 0.01; 1.26 ± 0.74 vs. 0.52 ± 0.24, p < 0.01). Furthermore, increased HER-2 expression was an independent risk factor for recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients (p < 0.01, HR = 3.421); Conclusions: The increased expression of HER-2 and its relationship with immune cells will provide new insights for immunotherapy in CRC patients.

Impact of Anti-EGFR Therapies on HER2-Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

HER2 overexpression/amplification in patients with RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) may be associated with resistance to standard-of-care anti-EGFR therapies. Given the lack of comprehensive investigations into this association, we assessed the prognostic or predictive effect of HER2 amplification/overexpression on anti-EGFR treatment outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library (2001-2021) identified studies evaluating progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) in HER2-positive vs. HER2-negative patients with RAS WT mCRC who received anti-EGFR treatments and whose HER2 status was known. Meta-analyses of proportions (ORR) and hazard ratios (PFS, OS) were performed using random-effect models with pre-specified sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Five high-quality retrospective cohort studies were included in the meta-analyses representing 594 patients with mCRC. All patients received anti-EGFR treatment, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. Meta-analysis of PFS demonstrated a 2.84-fold higher risk of death or progression (95% CI, 1.44-5.60) in patients with HER2-positive (vs. HER2-negative) RAS WT mCRC treated with anti-EGFR regimens. The odds of response to anti-EGFR treatment were 2-fold higher in HER2-negative vs. HER2-positive (odds ratio, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.10-3.48]). Differences in OS were not statistically significant. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base-case estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

While this study could not account for all confounding factors, in patients with RAS WT mCRC who received anti-EGFR therapy, HER2 overexpression/amplification was associated with worse PFS and ORR and may therefore predict poorer outcomes. HER2 testing is important to inform treatment decisions and could optimize outcomes for patients.

A comprehensive appraisal of HER2 heterogeneity in HER2-amplified and HER2-low colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to elucidate the clinicopathological and molecular features of HER2-amplified and HER2-low colorectal cancers (CRCs). We also characterised HER2 expression statuses in CRCs focusing on their intratumoral heterogeneity and alterations in metastatic lesions to establish practical HER2 status assessment.

METHODS

We evaluated 1009 CRCs for HER2 expression and HER2 amplification by immunohistochemistry and FISH, respectively, and correlated the results to clinicopathological and molecular data. For HER2-positive tumours, HER2 expression in metastatic lesions was also assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-five HER2-amplified (2.5%) and 46 HER2-low tumours (4.6%) were identified. HER2-amplified tumours consistently lacked a mucinous component and HER2-low tumours tended to be in the right colon, but no other clinicopathological features were noted. KRAS, NRAS or BRAF mutations were detected in only two HER2-amplified tumours (8%), whereas 23 HER2-low tumours (50%) had one of these mutations. Most HER2-amplified and HER2-low tumours showed a homogeneous or mosaic HER2 expression pattern and a clustered heterogeneous expression pattern was rather rare. HER2 expression was maintained in most metastatic lesions in both HER2-amplified (93%) and HER2-low tumours (81%).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that biopsy-based assessment of primary lesions is appropriate for the identification of CRC patients eligible for systemic HER2-targeted therapy.

Current Laboratory Testing Practices for Assessment of ERBB2/HER2 in Endometrial Serous Carcinoma and Colorectal Carcinoma

CONTEXT.—

Therapy targeted at human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2; also known as ERBB2) was used initially for breast and gastroesophageal carcinoma and has more recently been adopted for endometrial serous carcinoma (ESC) and colorectal carcinoma (CRC). There is evidence that predictive biomarker testing algorithms for HER2 must be tumor type specific and that an algorithm validated for one tumor type cannot be applied to another.

OBJECTIVE.—

To describe current laboratory practices for HER2 assessment in ESC and CRC.

DESIGN.—

We surveyed laboratories participating in the 2021 College of American Pathologists (CAP) HER2 immunohistochemistry proficiency testing program.

RESULTS.—

The survey was distributed to 1548 laboratories and returned by 1195, of which 83.5% (998) were in the United States. For ESC, 24.0% (287) of laboratories reported performing in-house testing for HER2 by immunohistochemical staining and/or in situ hybridization; of these, 44.3% (127) performed it reflexively on all cases of ESC. The most common criterion for evaluating HER2 was the American Society of Clinical Oncology/CAP 2018 guideline for breast carcinoma (69.0%; 194 of 281), whereas only 16.0% (45) of laboratories used guidelines specific to ESC. For CRC, 20.2% (239 of 1185) of laboratories performed in-house HER2 testing, and 82.0% of these (196) did the test only at the clinician's request. A plurality (49.4%; 115 of 233) used gastroesophageal cancer guidelines when scoring CRC, 30.0% (70) used the CRC scoring system from the HERACLES trial, and 16.3% (38) used the American Society of Clinical Oncology/CAP 2018 guideline for breast carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Laboratories vary in their approach to HER2 testing in ESC and CRC. Most laboratories did not report using tumor type-specific recommendations for HER2 interpretation. The lack of standardization could present a challenge to evidence-based practice when considering targeted therapy for these diseases.

[Molecular pathology of colorectal cancer]

In recent years, the treatment of colorectal carcinoma has experienced increasing individualization. In addition to RAS and BRAF mutational status that is firmly established in routine diagnostics, new therapeutic options evolved based on MSI and HER2 status as well as primary tumour localization. Offering the best targeted options in therapy requires new evidence-based decision-making algorithms regarding timing and scope of molecular pathological diagnostics in order for patients to receive an optimized therapy according to current treatment guidelines. New targeted therapies, some of which are about to be approved and for which pathology has to provide new molecular pathological biomarkers, will also play an increasingly important role in the future.

Ibero-American Consensus Review and Incorporation of New Biomarkers for Clinical Practice in Colorectal Cancer

Advances in genomic technologies have significantly improved the management of colorectal cancer (CRC). Several biomarkers have been identified in CRC that enable personalization in the use of biologic agents that have shown to enhance the clinical outcomes of patients. However, technologies used for their determination generate massive amounts of information that can be difficult for the clinician to interpret and use adequately. Through several discussion meetings, a group of oncology experts from Spain and several Latin American countries reviewed the latest literature to provide practical recommendations on the determination of biomarkers in CRC based on their clinical experience. The article also describes the importance of looking for additional prognostic biomarkers and the use of histopathology to establish an adequate molecular classification. Present and future of immunotherapy biomarkers in CRC patients are also discussed, together with several techniques for marker determination, including liquid biopsy, next-generation sequencing (NGS), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and fecal immunohistochemical tests. Finally, the role of Molecular Tumor Boards in the diagnosis and treatment of CRC is described. All of this information will allow us to highlight the importance of biomarker determination in CRC.

HER2 Status in RAS and BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Portuguese Study

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second-most deadly cancer worldwide. However, there remains a scarcity of precision treatments available for this type of cancer. Amplification or overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+) is a well-established therapeutic target in gastric and breast cancer. HER2 is positive in approximately 5% of CRC cases and has been implicated in resistance to therapy with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies. The aim of this study was to evaluate HER2 status in RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic CRC (mCRC) and its correlation with survival outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective analysis of RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC patients undergoing systemic treatment was conducted from July 2014 to September 2020. Tissue HER2 status was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH). HER2+ was defined as IHC3 (+) or IHC2 (+) through FISH or CISH (+).

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were included. The median age of all the included patients was 64 years (33-82). Four patients had HER2+ tumors (7%). Four patients had HER2+ tumors (7%). The majority of HER2+ mCRC cases were males (n=3) and left-sided CRC (n=3). All patients received FOLFIRI plus cetuximab as first-line treatment. At the median follow-up of 24.0 months, patients with HER2-negative mCRC presented with a median overall survival (mOS) of 39.4 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 32.7-46.0) and the four patients with HER2+ mCRC had a mOS of 20.4 months (95% CI; 9.5-31.3; p=0.07). In HER2-negative patients, the median PFS (mPFS) was 11.3 months (95% CI; 9.2-13.4) vsHER2-positive patients with a mPFS of 10.9 months (95% CI; 1.3-20.4; p=0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting HER2+ in mCRC patients in a Portuguese population and the HER2+ rate was consistent with previous studies. Our study suggests that HER2+ may potentially be a marker that is able to predict poor prognosis in RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC.

HER-2-Positive Tumors: A Continuously Evolving Field in Cancer Research

Almost 25 years ago, trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), was licensed for the treatment of patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in the United States of America (USA) [...].

Assessment of the expression pattern of HER2 and its correlation with HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate therapy in urothelial cancer

Background

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression is related to anti-HER2 therapy in many tumors. RC48- antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) has shown promising efficacy in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). The characteristic expression and scoring systems of HER2 are nonexistent in UC. We aimed to explore HER2 status and its correlation with the efficacy of HER2-targeting ADC therapy in UC.

Methods

A total of 137 and 43 patients were enrolled in cohort 1 and cohort 2, respectively, from March 2009 to December 2018. The patients in cohort 2 were enrolled in a phase II study of RC48-ADC. UC samples were tested for HER2 status using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 scoring system was adopted and modified to score HER2 expression in UC.

Results

The HER2-positive (IHC 2+ or 3+) rate was 24.1% (33/137). In HER2 IHC 2+ or 3+ patients, the HER2 gene amplification rate was 31% (13/42). The objective response rates (ORRs) in RC48-ADC-treated patients with IHC 3+, IHC 2+ and FISH+, IHC 2+ and FISH- were 58.8%, 66.7% and 40%, respectively. The ORR showed a trend toward a better benefit for RC48-ADC therapy in patients with HER2 amplification than in those without amplification (61.5% vs. 44.8%, P = 0.059). The heterogeneity of HER2 expression in the primary tumor was 55.5% (15/27), and the ORR was not significantly different between patients with tumor heterogeneity and homogeneity.

Conclusions

IHC testing should be performed to assess the HER2 status before the initiation of HER2-ADC therapy. There was a trend toward a better benefit for patients with HER2 amplification, and tumor heterogeneity did not influence the drug efficacy.

Assessment of HER2 in Gastric-Type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma and its Prognostic Significance

As the most common type of human papillomavirus-independent endocervical adenocarcinomas (ECAs), gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinomas (GEAs) account for approximately 10% of all ECAs. Although anti-HER2 therapy has been proven effective in many cancers, it has not been used in ECAs, including GEAs, which is at least partly due to the lack of a well-defined guideline. Limited available data regarding HER2 in GEAs and ECAs have considerable variations likely caused by variations in the tumor type selection, testing methods, and scoring criteria. Here, we selected 58 GEA cases to examine the HER2 status using immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization and investigate the prognostic value and their association with other known or potential prognostic factors. When strong complete or lateral/basolateral membranous reactivity in ≥10% tumor cells was used to define HER2 positivity, relatively high prevalence of HER2 overexpression (10/58[17.2%]) and amplification (9/58 [15.5%]), as well as high immunohistochemistry-fluorescent in situ hybridization concordance rate (9/10 [90%]) was found in GEAs. A lateral/basolateral staining pattern ("U-shaped") was observed, at least focally, in most of HER2-positive (3+) and equivocal (2+) tumors. Notably, considerable heterogeneity of HER2 expression was observed in HER2 positive and equivocal cases (80.0% and 83.3%, respectively). HER2 overexpression and amplification were associated with worse progression-free survival (P = .047 and P = .032, respectively). Programmed death-ligand 1 expression was associated with worse progression-free survival (P = .032), whereas mutant-type p53 demonstrated no prognostic significance. Our work laid a solid foundation for the eventual development of a future standard HER2 testing guideline for GEAs.

A Case of HER2 Mutated Colorectal Cancer Treated Successfully With Fam-Trastuzumab Deruxtecan

Colorectal cancer is a malignant tumor arising from the inner lining of the colon or rectum and is the third most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene overexpressed or amplified colorectal cancer has shown treatment responses with HER2-directed therapies. We present a 78-year-old woman with metastatic colorectal cancer with a HER2 L726I mutation identified in tumor sequencing with amplification or overexpression of HER2. She had an excellent response to fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan. Our case is the first and most noteworthy case of a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer and a HER2 L726I mutation who achieved a remarkable clinical response to fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan.

Tucatinib plus trastuzumab for chemotherapy-refractory, HER2-positive, RAS wild-type unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer (MOUNTAINEER): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

HER2 is an actionable target in metastatic colorectal cancer. We assessed the activity of tucatinib plus trastuzumab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory, HER2-positive, RAS wild-type unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

MOUNTAINEER is a global, open-label, phase 2 study that enrolled patients aged 18 years and older with chemotherapy-refractory, HER2-positive, RAS wild-type unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer at 34 sites (clinics and hospitals) in five countries (Belgium, France, Italy, Spain, and the USA). Initially, the study was designed as a single-cohort study, which was expanded following an interim analysis to include more patients. Initially, patients were given tucatinib (300 mg orally twice daily) plus intravenous trastuzumab (8 mg/kg as an initial loading dose, then 6 mg/kg every 21 days; cohort A) for the duration of treatment (until progression), and after expansion, patients were randomly assigned (4:3), using an interactive web response system and stratified by primary tumour location, to either tucatinib plus trastuzumab (cohort B) or tucatinib monotherapy (cohort C). The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate per blinded independent central review (BICR) for cohorts A and B combined and was assessed in patients in the full analysis set (ie, patients with HER2-positive disease who received at least one dose of study treatment). Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043313, and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 8, 2017, and Sept 22, 2021, 117 patients were enrolled (45 in cohort A, 41 in cohort B, and 31 in cohort C), of whom 114 patients had locally assessed HER2-positive disease and received treatment (45 in cohort A, 39 in cohort B, and 30 in cohort C; full analysis set), and 116 patients received at least one dose of study treatment (45 in cohort A, 41 in cohort B, and 30 in cohort C; safety population). In the full analysis set, median age was 56·0 years (IQR 47-64), 66 (58%) were male, 48 (42%) were female, 88 (77%) were White, and six (5%) were Black or African American. As of data cutoff (March 28, 2022), in 84 patients from cohorts A and B in the full analysis set, the confirmed objective response rate per BICR was 38·1% (95% CI 27·7-49·3; three patients had a complete response and 29 had a partial response). In cohorts A and B, the most common adverse event was diarrhoea (55 [64%] of 86), the most common grade 3 or worse adverse event was hypertension (six [7%] of 86), and three (3%) patients had tucatinib-related serious adverse events (acute kidney injury, colitis, and fatigue). In cohort C, the most common adverse event was diarrhoea (ten [33%] of 30), the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were increased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase (both two [7%]), and one (3%) patient had a tucatinib-related serious adverse event (overdose). No deaths were attributed to adverse events. All deaths in treated patients were due to disease progression.

INTERPRETATION

Tucatinib plus trastuzumab had clinically meaningful anti-tumour activity and favourable tolerability. This treatment is the first US Food and Drug Administration-approved anti-HER2 regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer and is an important new treatment option for chemotherapy-refractory HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer.

FUNDING

Seagen and Merck & Co.

A review on emerging targeted therapies for the management of metastatic colorectal cancers

Colorectal cancers are among the most commonly found cancers over the world. In spite of the recent advancements in diagnosis and prognosis, the management of this metastatic condition remains a challenge. The utility of monoclonal antibodies in the healing of patients with colorectal cancer has opened a new chapter in the quest for newer therapies. The resistance to the standard treatment regimen made it mandatory to search for newer targets. Mutagenic alterations in the gene engaged in cellular differentiation and growth pathway have been the reason for resistance to treatment. The newer therapies target the various proteins and receptors involved in the signal transduction and down streaming pathways leading to cell proliferation. This review presents an insight into the newer targeted therapies for colorectal cancer involving tyrosine kinase blockers, epidermal growth factor receptors, vascular endothelial growth factor, immune checkpoint therapy, and BRAF inhibitors.

"A Review of HER2 overexpression and somatic mutations in cancers"

The Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER) proteins family, which includes HER2, are membrane-bound receptors that activate many intracellular pathways associated with growth and development. When there are mutations in HER2, or when it becomes overexpressed, it can cause oncogenesis and offer differential prognosis and treatment across almost all cancer types. Both mutations in HER2 and its overexpression have distinct mechanisms by which they can cause these effects in cancers. This review outlines how HER2's normal pathway is altered in both overexpression and mutation and compiles all the well-known mechanisms by which HER2 can cause oncogenesis. Finally, this review briefly outlines how HER2 mutants and HER2 overexpression is detected, and how their detection can lead to different prognosis and treatment in cancers.

Frequency of Her2-low in colorectal cancer and its relations with the tumor microenvironment

BACKGROUND

To date, little is known regarding human epithelial growth factor receptor (HER2) low-expressing colorectal cancer (CRC). Due to promising rising therapies with HER2-antibody-drug conjugates we aimed to analyze the frequency of HER2-low in patients with CRC. Additionally we characterized the clinicopathologic background of this group and its potential relationship with the tumor microenvironment represented by budding and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs).

METHODS

319 patients with CRC, stages I-IV, were enrolled. HER2-immunohistochemistry (IHC) as well as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were performed on tissue microarrays. IHC was evaluated semiquantitatively and software-assisted using the HERACLES Diagnostic Criteria for CRC. HER2-low was defined as IHC 1 + or 2 +/FISH negative. HER2-IHC results were compared with budding, TILs and their combinations.

RESULTS

The HER2 low-expressing subset represented almost one half of all CRC (47.1 %). Assessment was highly reproducible with different methods. HER2-low cases were significantly more often lower T-, N-, and tumor stage and had less L1 compared with HER2-0. Additionally, they showed more often TILs > 5 % (p = 0.001). The difference between HER2-0 and HER2-low was highly significant between the four budding/TILs-groups (p < 0.001). Cases with low budding/high TILs were more often HER2-low. The highest difference was seen between the low budding/high TILs-group and the low budding/low TILs-group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

HER2-low expression in CRC is frequent and involves nearly one half of all patients. We could show a relationsship between HER2-low expression and the tumor microenvironment. Special attention should be paid to the low budding/high TILs group in future research.

Molecular mechanisms targeting drug-resistance and metastasis in colorectal cancer: Updates and beyond

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most diagnosed malignancy and a major leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Despite advances in therapeutic regimens, the number of patients presenting with metastatic CRC (mCRC) is increasing due to resistance to therapy, conferred by a small population of cancer cells, known as cancer stem cells. Targeted therapies have been highly successful in prolonging the overall survival of patients with mCRC. Agents are being developed to target key molecules involved in drug-resistance and metastasis of CRC, and these include vascular endothelial growth factor, epidermal growth factor receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2, mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase, in addition to immune checkpoints. Currently, there are several ongoing clinical trials of newly developed targeted agents, which have shown considerable clinical efficacy and have improved the prognosis of patients who do not benefit from conventional chemotherapy. In this review, we highlight recent developments in the use of existing and novel targeted agents against drug-resistant CRC and mCRC. Furthermore, we discuss limitations and challenges associated with targeted therapy and strategies to combat intrinsic and acquired resistance to these therapies, in addition to the importance of implementing better preclinical models and the application of personalized therapy based on predictive biomarkers for treatment selection.

Resistance to targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: Current status and new developments

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most lethal and common malignancies in the world. Chemotherapy has been the conventional treatment for metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients. However, the effects of chemotherapy have been unsatisfactory. With the advent of targeted therapy, the survival of patients with CRC have been prolonged. Over the past 20 years, targeted therapy for CRC has achieved substantial progress. However, targeted therapy has the same challenge of drug resistance as chemotherapy. Consequently, exploring the resistance mechanism and finding strategies to address the resistance to targeted therapy, along with searching for novel effective regimens, is a constant challenge in the mCRC treatment, and it is also a hot research topic. In this review, we focus on the current status on resistance to existing targeted therapies in mCRC and discuss future developments.

The role of HER2 as a therapeutic biomarker in gynaecological malignancy: potential for use beyond uterine serous carcinoma

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in carcinomas of the breast, stomach and colon. In 2018, clinical trial data confirmed the prognostic and predictive role of HER2 in uterine serous carcinoma, with a demonstrated survival benefit from combined chemotherapy and anti-HER2 targeted therapy in patients with advanced or recurrent disease. Approximately one-third of uterine serous carcinomas demonstrate HER2 protein overexpression and/or gene amplification and HER2 immunohistochemistry, supplemented by in situ hybridisation in equivocal cases, is fast becoming a reflex ancillary test at time of diagnosis. The potential role of HER2 in gynaecological tumours other than uterine serous carcinoma is yet to be firmly established. With the advent of personalised medicine, routine tumour sequencing and pursuit of targeted therapies, this is a field currently under active investigation. Emerging data suggest triaging endometrial carcinomas for HER2 analysis based on molecular classification may be superior to histotype-based testing, with copy-number high/p53 mutant tumours enriched for HER2 overexpression or amplification. Accordingly, many carcinosarcomas and a subset of clear cell and high-grade endometrioid carcinomas may be eligible for HER2 targeted therapy, although any clinical benefit in this context is currently undefined. For ovarian carcinomas, combined data support the role of HER2 as a prognostic biomarker, however its use as a therapeutic target is yet to be elucidated through clinical trials. In the cervix, reported rates of HER2 overexpression vary and are generally low, and currently there is insufficient evidence to justify routine HER2 testing in this context. Limited data suggest HER2 holds promise as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in vulvar Paget disease. Future clinical trials, with pathologist input to develop and refine site-specific scoring criteria, are required to establish what role HER2 might play more broadly in gynaecological cancer care.

Distinct Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Values of High-, Low-, or Non-Expressing HER2 Status in Colorectal Cancer

The encouraging effects of HER2-ADC in patients with HER2-low expression cancers indicated the classical classifications based on positive and negative HER2 might no longer be suitable. However, the biology and prognosis of colorectal cancer patients with different HER2 expression status were still not clear. This is a multi-center retrospective study that included patients with histologically confirmed colorectal cancer and determined HER2 status who received radical surgical resection. HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ and IHC 2+ groups were combined and defined as a HER2-low group because of the concordance of clinicopathological characteristics. As compared with the HER2-high group, both the HER2-zero and the HER2-low group had less tumor with perineural invasion (14.3%, 13.1% vs. 31.6%, p = 0.001 and p < 0.001), less stage III disease (41.8%, 39.9% vs. 56.1%, p = 0.044 and p = 0.022), more RAS/BRAF mutation (52.1%, 49.9% vs. 19.5%, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001) and better disease-free survival (DFS) (3y-DFS rate of 78.7%, 82.4% vs. 59.3%, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis and propensity score matching also revealed that HER2-high expression was an independent prognostic factor of DFS. In conclusion, our study revealed that HER2-low colorectal cancer tumors are close to HER2-zero tumors, but different from HER2-high tumors. The routine examination of HER2 IHC is needed in early-stage colorectal cancer.

[Assessment of HER2 status of carcinomas of various localizations]

A detailed description of the methodological aspects of the evaluation of HER2-status in carcinomas of such localizations as the mammary gland, pancreas, salivary glands, stomach, colon, endometrium, bladder, lungs is presented. Approaches and criteria for assessing HER2 status from methodological and clinical points of view are analyzed. The data are systematized in tables for use in practical diagnostic work.

HER2 overexpression/amplification status in colorectal cancer: a comparison between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization using five different immunohistochemical scoring criteria

OBJECTIVE

Although HER2 has gradually become an important therapeutic target for colorectal cancer (CRC), a unified and standard HER2 scoring system was still not established in CRC, and the debatable results of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in CRC requires further exploration.

METHODS

In this study, we use five immunohistochemical (IHC) scoring criteria (i.e., IRS-p, IRS-m, GEA-s, GEA-b and HERACLES) and two FISH criteria to evaluate HER2 status, and further evaluate the correlation between HER2 status and clinicopathological features, survival in a large, unselected Chinese cohort of 664 CRCs.

RESULTS

Finally, we set HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥ 2.0, or an average HER2 copy number ≥ 6.0 as FISH-positive threshold and the amplification rate of HER2 gene was 7.08% (47/664).The HER2 positivity (IHC 3+) was 2.71%, 3.16%, 2.56%, 2.71% and 3.16%, according to the IHC scoring criteria of IRS-p, IRS-m, GEA-s, GEA-b and HERACLES, respectively. Set FISH results as the golden standard; receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that IRS-p had both high sensitivity and specificity than other IHC scoring systems to evaluate HER2 status. Based on IRS-p criterion, There were significant differences in tumor differentiation (p = 0.038), lymphatic vascular invasion (p = 0.001), pN stage (p value = 0.043), and overall survival (p < 0.001) among IHC score 0-3 + groups. Meanwhile, there were significant differences in pT stage (p = 0.031), pN stage (p = 0.009) and overall survival (p < 0.001) among FISH subgroups.

CONCLUSION

The IRS-p criterion was more suitable for assessing the HER2 status in CRC patients than other IHC criteria. Whereas for FISH scoring system, only HER2/CEP17 < 2.0, meanwhile HER2cn < 4.0 and HER2cn ≥ 6.0 were subgroups with unique clinicopathological characteristics.

Molecular Basis of HER2-Targeted Therapy for HER2-Positive Colorectal Cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification has emerged as a biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC), occurring in 1-4% of metastatic CRC (mCRC). In addition to conventional methods, such as immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization, next-generation sequencing-based tissue or circulating tumor DNA analysis has recently been used to identify HER2 amplification and assess HER2 overexpression. Prospective clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of HER2-targeted therapies in HER2-positive mCRC. The TRIUMPH study, a phase II study of dual HER2 antibodies, i.e., pertuzumab plus trastuzumab, demonstrated promising efficacy for patients with HER2-positive mCRC confirmed by tissue-and/or blood-based techniques, which led to the regulatory approval of this combination therapy in Japan. The mechanisms associated with efficacy and resistance have also been explored in translational studies that incorporate liquid biopsy in prospective trials. In particular, HER2 copy number and co-alterations have repeatedly been reported as biomarkers related to efficacy. To improve the therapeutic efficacy of the current strategy, many clinical trials with various HER2-targeted agents are ongoing. This review discusses the molecular basis of HER2-targeted therapeutic strategies for patients with HER2-positive mCRC.