Chromosomal gains and genomic loss of p53 and p16 genes in Barrett's esophagus detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization of cytology specimens

Point-Counterpoint: Screening and Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus, Is It Worthwhile?

The exponential rise in incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), paired with persistently poor survival, continues to drive efforts to improve and optimize screening and surveillance practices. While advancements in endoscopic therapy have generated a shift in management and significantly improved the outcomes of patients with early-stage EAC, the majority of prevalent EAC continues to be diagnosed at advanced stages, remaining ineligible for curative therapy. Barrett's esophagus (BE) screening, when applied to high-yield target populations, using minimally or noninvasive accurate tests, followed by endoscopic surveillance to detect prevalent or incident dysplasia/EAC (which can then be treated successfully) is the cornerstone of the current BE management paradigm. While supported by some empiric evidence and attractive, this approach faces a number of challenges, which are also balanced by numerous recent advances in these areas. In this manuscript, we review the rationale, supportive evidence, current challenges, and recent progress in BE screening and surveillance.

Loss of P16 in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Detected by Fluorescence in situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry

Molecular biology of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is not fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to assess the expression of cycle regulator and tumor suppressor p16 in esophageal adenocarcinoma. The expression of p16 at protein and gene level was investigated using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in thirteen EAC specimens obtained by endoscopic biopsies and surgical resections. The mean age of enrolled patients was 62 years and a male predominance was observed. Loss of p16 protein expression was detected in 77% of the cases and loss of p16 gene was found in 69% of cases as hemizygous deletion was the most common. Significant correlation was found between the absence of p16 protein expression and p16 allelic loss. Cell cycle disturbances seem to play role in the EAC carcinogenesis and probably p16 gene deletions are connected with the loss of p16 protein expression.

Sponge Sampling with Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization as a Screening Tool for the Early Detection of Esophageal Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Sponge cytology is a novel screening tool for esophageal cancer but has been unable to be validated for widespread use. Our aim was to apply fluorescent in situ hybridization to sponge cytology samples in order to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this modality in screening for esophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

At a single, multidisciplinary, NCI-designated cancer center, patients completed sponge cytology sampling prior to upper endoscopy. Samples were analyzed by p53 fluorescent in situ hybridization, and results were compared to the endoscopic diagnosis.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were enrolled (96 % Caucasian, 68 % male, median age of 67). All patients successfully swallowed the capsule. No complications (string breakage, bleeding, mucosal injury) occurred. Endoscopy revealed that 38 % had normal esophageal mucosa and 62 % had an esophageal mucosal abnormality. In total, six samples demonstrated p53 loss (94 % specificity for any abnormality). The sensitivity of the p53 fluorescent in situ hybridization probe was13.3 % for any abnormality, 10 % for intestinal metaplasia, and 0 % for dysplasia or esophageal cancer.

DISCUSSION

Esophageal sponge cytology is a promising, safe, and tolerable method for collecting esophageal cell samples. However, our data suggest that p53 fluorescent in situ hybridization does not improve the sensitivity for detecting cancer in these samples.

Dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus: p53 immunostaining is more reproducible than haematoxylin and eosin diagnosis and improves overall reliability, while grading is poorly reproducible

AIMS

p53 immunostaining in Barrett's oesophagus (BO) has been shown to be predictive of progression, but data regarding its generalizability to routine practice are lacking. This study compared the reliability of p53 and dysplasia interpretation and grading.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventy-two cases encompassing the full spectrum of BO were circulated to 10 pathologists from four institutions after a brief training session in p53 interpretation. Each pathologist classified cases on haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) alone using the Vienna classification and assessed the p53 staining using a qualitative system. Agreement was assessed using kappa statistics. For the four-tier Vienna system, the average unweighted kappa was 0.30. Weighted kappa values varied from 0.27 to 0.69 with an average of 0.47. When grouped into definite dysplasia versus no definite dysplasia the average kappa was 0.55, but the kappa for low-grade dysplasia (LGD) versus high-grade dysplasia (HGD) was only 0.31. For p53, using the three recognized patterns, the unweighted kappa was 0.6 (confidence interval 0.58-0.63). When cases were evaluated with both H&E and p53 the average kappa was 0.61 for definite dysplasia versus the rest.

CONCLUSIONS

p53 immunohistochemistry interpretation is more reliable than dysplasia diagnosis, even with limited training. As it is predictive of prognosis and improves diagnostic reproducibility, it is suitable for routine use by pathologists as an adjunct to dysplasia diagnosis. The distinction of LGD versus HGD was poor. This study supports simplifying dysplasia diagnosis into 'present', 'indefinite' or 'absent', and the use of p53 as an ancillary marker in difficult cases. This should help to prevent overdiagnosis of dysplasia and inappropriate treatment.

Biomarkers in Barrett's Esophagus: Role in Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Prediction of Response to Therapy

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has increased dramatically in the past 3 decades, making its precursor lesion Barrett's esophagus (BE) an important clinical problem. Effective interventions are available, but overall outcomes remain unchanged. Most of the BE population remains undiagnosed; most EACs are diagnosed late, and most BE patients will never progress to cancer. These epidemiologic factors make upper endoscopy an inefficient and ineffective strategy for BE diagnosis and risk stratification. In the current review, biomarkers for diagnosis, risk stratification, and predictors of response to therapy in BE are discussed.

Screening for Barrett's Esophagus

The large increase in the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in the West during the past 30 years has stimulated interest in screening for Barrett's esophagus (BE), a precursor to esophageal cancer. Effective endoscopic treatments for dysplasia and intramucosal cancer, coupled with screening programs to detect BE, could help reverse the increase in the incidence of esophageal cancer. However, there are no accurate, cost-effective, minimally invasive techniques available to screen for BE, reducing the enthusiasm of gastroenterologists. Over the past 5 years, there has been significant progress in the development of screening technologies. We review existing and developing technologies, new minimally invasive imaging techniques, nonendoscopic devices for cell collection, and biomarkers that can be measured in blood or stool samples. We discuss the status of these approaches, data from clinical studies of their effects, and their anticipated strengths and weaknesses in screening. The area is rapidly evolving, and new tools will soon be ready for prime time.

The use of molecular markers in predicting dysplasia and guiding treatment

The ability to stratify patients based on the risk of progression to oesophageal adenocarcinoma would provide benefit to patients as well as deliver a more cost effective surveillance programme. Current practice is to survey all patients with Barrett's oesophagus (BO) and use histological diagnoses to guide further management. However, reliance on histology alone has its drawbacks. We are currently unable to reliably stratify the risk of progression of patients with non-dysplastic BO based on any particular histological feature. There is also considerable variability in histological interpretation. An obvious recourse has been to rely on identifying molecular features possibly as an adjunct to histology, to better diagnose and stratify patients. To this end, p53 immunohistochemistry can be used as a useful adjunct to risk stratify and clarify histological grades, particularly low-grade dysplasia. Other markers of progression, although not yet in a clinically applicable format, are promising. Measurements of promoter methylation and also genomic instability such as loss of heterozygosity and copy number alterations show promise especially as high throughput genetic technologies reach maturity. The enduring hope is that these molecular biomarkers will make the transition to clinical applicability either in the direct endoscopic setting or even using non-endoscopic methods.

Utility of liquid-based cytologic examination of distal esophageal brushings in the management of Barrett esophagus: a prospective study of 45 cases

INTRODUCTION

The goal of Barrett esophagus surveillance is to identify high-grade dysplasia (HGD) for eradication. Surveillance programs currently rely on limited histologic sampling; however, the role of cytology in this setting is not well studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From December 1, 2011 to March 30, 2014, 45 patients underwent 4 circumferential brushings of the distal tubular esophagus followed by standard 4-quadrant biopsies. One ThinPrep slide and 1 Cellient cellblock (Hologic, Boxborough, Mass) were prepared. Six cytopathologists evaluated each for adequacy, intestinal metaplasia (IM) and dysplasia. Findings were classified using the traditional 5-tier system used for biopsies. A prospectively modified 3-tier cytologic classification was also tested: negative for HGD, indeterminate for HGD, and HGD. Sensitivity, specificity, and kappa values (interobserver agreement) for cytology were calculated.

RESULTS

Ten of 45 patients had nondiagnostic cytologies; none of whom had dysplasia on biopsy. Cytology had good sensitivity (82%) and specificity (88%) for identifying IM compared with biopsy with moderate interobserver agreement (pairwise average of Fleiss and Krippendorf kappa value = 0.589, 79% agreement). One case had IM on cytology not detected on histology. Six of 45 patients had dysplasia on biopsy including 1 intramucosal adenocarcinoma, 1 indeterminate for dysplasia, 2 high-grade dysplasias, and 2 low-grade dysplasias. A non-negative adequate cytology sample had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 88% and 94% for the 5-tier and the 3-tier classification, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytology appears to have good sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of HGD, and cytology may be poised to synergize with advances in other techniques for management of patients with Barrett esophagus. Improvements in brushing devices may help to decrease the nondiagnostic rate.

Molecular markers for Barrett's esophagus and its progression to cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is a clinical need for biomarkers that can improve diagnostic accuracy and risk stratification of esophageal lesions. Here we review the current literature and highlight the most important, recent advancements in biomarkers as a supplement to histopathology for management of patients with Barrett's esophagus.

RECENT FINDINGS

A prospective cohort study in Northern Ireland shows that a small panel of biomarkers (low-grade dysplasia, abnormal DNA ploidy and Aspergillus oryzae lectin) can identify patients at high risk for developing high-grade dysplasia or cancer. Recent research in molecular imaging shows promise for molecular probes in endoscopy, using fluorescently labeled peptides or lectins to identify dysplastic areas of Barrett's epithelium. Based on the current literature, p53 immunostaining is starting to be adopted by some centers as an adjunct to histopathology diagnosis for dysplasia.

SUMMARY

The evidence base for the use of biomarkers is increasing and it appears that panels may have superior diagnostic and predictive power over single, candidate biomarkers. Prior to clinical implementation, biomarkers must overcome significant barriers including the need for large-scale prospective validation trials, and the limited ability of clinical laboratories to process and analyze complex biomarker assays.

Managing Barrett's esophagus with radiofrequency ablation

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a well-established pre-malignant lesion for esophageal adenocarcinoma, a condition that carries a dismal five-year overall survival rate of less than 15%. Among several available methods to eliminate BE, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) provides the most efficient modality, since it has been demonstrated to successfully eradicate BE with or without dysplasia with acceptable safety, efficacy and durability profiles. In conjunction with proton pump therapy, this new technology has quickly become the standard care for patients with dysplastic BE. However, several technical questions remain about how to deploy RFA therapy for maximum effectiveness and long-term favorable outcomes for all stages of the disease. These include how to select patient for therapy, what the best protocol for RFA is, when to use other modalities, such as endoscopic mucosal resection, and what should be considered for refractory BE. This review addresses these questions with the perspective of the best available evidence matched with the authors' experience with the technology.

Barrett's esophagus: A review of diagnostic criteria, clinical surveillance practices and new developments

Barrett's esophagus is defined by metaplastic glandular changes to the distal esophagus and is linked to an increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Controversy exists whether the definition should be limited to intestinal type glands with goblet cells or should be expanded to include non-goblet cell columnar epithelium. Barrett's esophagus may be asymptomatic in a large proportion of the population but screening should be considered for those with certain clinical findings. The diagnosis of Barrett's should be based on the combination of careful endoscopic evaluation and histologic review of the biopsy material. Continued surveillance biopsies may be necessary in cases of indeterminate or low grade dysplasia. Clinical follow-up of patients with high grade dysplasia should be tailored to the individual patient. Development of newer endoscopy techniques including chemoendoscopy, chromoendoscopy and use of biomarkers on frozen tissue have shown some promise of identifying patients at risk for malignancy.

Molecular pathological diagnosis for early esophageal cancer in Kazakh patients

Chromosome abnormalities in cancer cells occur early in carcinogenesis. We employed DNA probes for the detection of cancer cells in surgical specimens in Kazakh patients with suspected esophageal carcinoma, to analyze the application of this technique during the early diagnosis of esophageal cancer. Comparative analysis was used to compare the results of pathological diagnosis with the results of FISH. We performed esophagofiberscopic biopsy examinations in 50 Kazakh patients with suspected esophageal carcinoma, including 40 males and 10 females, with an average age of 56.8 years. The final diagnosis was esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in 47 patients, and adenocarcinoma, mucinous carcinoma and small cell carcinoma in one patient each. The pathological findings of the biopsy were positive in 45 cases, and false-negative in 5. The sensitivity and specificity of pathological diagnosis were 87.2 and 100%, respectively. Using FISH to examine the same tissues, we found that 48 cases showed aberrant copy numbers in either chromosome 3 or 17, and 2 cases were false-negative, with a sensitivity and specificity of 94.8 and 100%, respectively. The copy numbers of centromeres in chromosome 3 were significantly higher than the copy numbers of centromeres in chromosome 17 (P=0.0001). Compared with biopsy pathology, the FISH test was more sensitive. Being an objective and qualitative method, the technology of molecular pathological diagnosis may effectively increase the early diagnostic rate of esophageal cancer. In addition, the centromere probe in chromosome 3 may be the most sensitive probe for the diagnosis of esophageal cancer in Kazakh patients.

Clinical implications of molecular changes in pediatric Barrett's esophagus

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a preneoplastic condition that predisposes to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Although data on the occurrence of BE in children are limited, recent studies have suggested an increase in the pediatric population. BE is thought to be a complex disease in which individual genetic predisposition interacts with environmental stimuli. Early premalignant clones produce biological and genetic heterogeneity, resulting in stepwise changes in differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis, allowing disease progression under selective pressure. The value of endoscopic surveillance biopsy for dysplasia and carcinoma in patients with BE is controversial. Thus, the recognition of early and objective alternative risk markers, less susceptible of sampling error, will be of relevance in the management of BE patients. The possibility of performing molecular genetics on paraffin-embedded biopsies will expand our understanding of the natural history of BE and may lead to the use of biomarkers to inform treatment strategies.

Developing a nonendoscopic screening test for Barrett's esophagus

Barrett's esophagus (BE) arises as a complication of chronic gastro-esophageal reflux disease and is the precursor lesion for esophageal adenocarcinoma. The prevalence of esophageal adenocarcinoma has been increasing in Western countries and the overall prognosis from this cancer remains dismal. Surveillance for BE is highly controversial since although early cancer detection through surveillance programs benefits individuals, surveillance has not been proven to reduce population mortality from the disease. One factor contributing to this apparent paradox is that an estimated >80% cases of BE are undiagnosed and, therefore, do not have the benefit of surveillance. Some form of screening modality is required to achieve more comprehensive detection of BE, which in turn, may lead to early detection of cancerous lesions and early intervention in order to reduce progression to invasive and symptomatic cancer. The advent of endoscopic therapy makes this paradigm attractive. A number of methods could be considered for screening. These include a nonendoscopic sampling method using a Cytosponge that needs to be coupled with a biomarker to obtain required levels of sensitivity and specificity. For screening to be recommended consideration needs to be given to the point of delivery, cost and acceptability to patients.

Detection of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus with in vivo depth-resolved nuclear morphology measurements

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) show increased risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma and are routinely examined using upper endoscopy with biopsy to detect neoplastic changes. Angle-resolved low coherence interferometry (a/LCI) uses in vivo depth-resolved nuclear morphology measurements to detect dysplasia. We assessed the clinical utility of a/LCI in the endoscopic surveillance of patients with BE.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing routine surveillance upper endoscopy for BE were recruited at 2 endoscopy centers. A novel, endoscope-compatible a/LCI system measured the mean diameter and refractive index of cell nuclei in esophageal epithelium at 172 biopsy sites in 46 patients. At each site, an a/LCI measurement was correlated with a concurrent endoscopic biopsy specimen. Each biopsy specimen was assessed histologically and classified as normal, nondysplastic BE, indeterminate for dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia (LGD), or high-grade dysplasia (HGD). The a/LCI data from multiple depths were analyzed to evaluate its ability to differentiate dysplastic from nondysplastic tissue.

RESULTS

Pathology characterized 5 of the scanned sites as HGD, 8 as LGD, 75 as nondysplastic BE, 70 as normal tissue types, and 14 as indeterminate for dysplasia. The a/LCI nuclear size measurements separated dysplastic from nondysplastic tissue at a statistically significant (P < .001) level for the tissue segment 200 to 300 μm beneath the surface with an accuracy of 86% (147/172). A receiver operator characteristic analysis indicated an area under the curve of 0.91, and an optimized decision point gave 100% (13/13) sensitivity and 84% (134/159) specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary data suggest a/LCI is accurate in detecting dysplasia in vivo in patients with BE.

Computational analysis of the influence of the microenvironment on carcinogenesis

The tumour microenvironment is known to play an important role in determining the sequence of acquired phenotypic traits that characterise cancer evolution. A more precise understanding of this role could have a major influence in the understanding of cancer growth and development, and potentially in the optimisation of innovative anti-cancer treatments delivery. However, to lead such an analysis in the basis of traditional biological experiments and observations is almost utopian given the complexity of the underlying biological processes and the typical time scales involved. In this context, computer models constitute a complementary exploratory tool. In this paper we introduce a two-dimensional cellular automaton that models key cancer cell capabilities. The model has been especially designed to mimic the behaviour of a cancer colony growing in vitro and to analyse the effect of different environmental conditions on the sequence of acquisition of phenotypic traits. Our results indicate that microenvironmental factors such as the local concentration of oxygen or nutrients and cell overcrowding may determine the expansion of the tumour colony. The results also show that tumour cells evolve and that their phenotypes adapt to the microenvironment so that environmental stress determines the dominance of particular phenotypical traits.

Molecular abnormalities in pediatric barrett esophagus: can we test for potential of neoplastic progression?

Barrett esophagus (BE) is a preneoplastic condition that predisposes to esophageal adenocarcinoma and is a consequence of prolonged gastroesophageal reflux disease. The condition is mainly seen in adults and is thought to be a complex disease in which individual genetic predisposition interacts with environmental stimuli. The aim of our study was to investigate whether genetic biomarkers of potential disease progression are the same in the rare situation of pediatric BE, as described in adults. We performed fluorescence in situ hybridization with probes from Abbott Vysis Corporation on 4-micron sections taken from 48 paraffin-embedded sequential biopsies of 10 cases of BE. The 4 probe sets were specific for HER2 at 17q12/17 centromere/4 centromere, p16 at 9p21/9 centromere, TP53 at 17p13/17 centromere/6 centromere, and CCND1 at 11q13/11 centromere. The probe sets were validated on 10 cases of adult Barrett adenocarcinoma. Of the 10 cases, 6 biopsies in 5 cases were informative. Two had gain of HER2 detected in 1 biopsy each (1 also had gain of chromosome 17) and 4 separate cases showed p16 deletion in 1 biopsy of each (1 also had gain of chromosome 9). The genetic markers informative in 50% of our cases were also identified in adult patients with Barrett adenocarcinoma. The importance of this study is that even at the pediatric level, BE can show genetic changes associated with neoplastic progression.

Biomarkers in Barrett's Esophagus

Biomarkers are substances that can be used to indicate normal or diseased states. In clinical settings, the term biomarker generally refers to a molecular marker produced by tissues whose detection heralds a diseased state. For patients with Barrett's esophagus, there are at least three clinical settings in which the use of molecular biomarkers has been proposed including 1) stratifying the risk of neoplastic progression, 2) serving as an adjunct to aid in the diagnosis of dysplasia, and 3) predicting response to ablative therapies. Although the routine clinical use of biomarkers in any of these clinical settings is not yet recommended, it seems reasonable to assume that biomarker validation studies will be carried out in the coming years and that movement into the clinics will be inevitable. This article reviews the current progress in using biomarkers in each of the clinical settings described above with a focus on the molecular biomarkers which have advanced the farthest toward use in routine clinical practice.

Early events during neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus

Barrett's esophagus is a condition in which the stratified squamous epithelium of the distal esophagus is replaced by specialized intestinal metaplasia. Clinical management of Barrett's esophagus, like many other "premalignant" conditions, is characterized by overdiagnosis of benign early changes that will not cause death or suffering during the lifetime of an individual and underdiagnosis of life-threatening early disease. Recent studies of a number of different types of cancer have revealed much greater genomic complexity than was previously suspected. This genomic complexity could create challenges for early detection and prevention if it develops in premalignant epithelia prior to cancer. Neoplastic progression unfolds in space and time, and Barrett's esophagus provides one of the best models for rapid advances, including "gold standard" cohort studies, to distinguish individuals who do and do not progress to cancer. Specialized intestinal metaplasia has many properties that appear to be protective adaptations to the abnormal environment of gastroesophageal reflux. A large body of evidence accumulated over several decades implicates chromosome instability in neoplastic progression from Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Small, spatial scale studies have been used to infer the temporal order in which genomic abnormalities develop during neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus. These spatial studies have provided the basis for prospective cohort studies of biomarkers, including DNA content abnormalities (tetraploidy, aneuploidy) and a biomarker panel of 9p LOH, 17p LOH and DNA content abnormalities. Recent advances in SNP array technology provide a uniform platform to assess chromosome instability.

Barrett's dysplasia and the Vienna classification: reproducibility, prediction of progression and impact of consensus reporting and p53 immunohistochemistry

AIMS

The Vienna classification is used to classify dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus (BO), but reproducibility and value of diagnosis of lower grades in particular are often questioned. The aim was to test the diagnostic variability and correlation with patient outcome and to attempt to define histological features causing discrepant diagnoses, as well as to test the impact of adding p53 immunohistochemistry on reproducibility and prediction of outcome.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and forty-three patients with 154 sets of biopsy specimens originally diagnosed with Barrett's dysplasia were retrieved from the pathology records of Nottingham University Hospital. Thirty-two Barrett's patients without dysplasia were added. Anonymized slides were graded independently by five pathologists without and with p53-stained slides. Interobserver variation, correlation with outcome and diagnostic accuracy were determined. Weighted kappa scores between pairs of pathologists showed substantial agreement and improved after p53 immunohistochemistry. Agreement with the original diagnosis was substantially lower. Fourteen of 34 low-grade dysplasias (LGD) and 27 of 30 high-grade dysplasias on consensus progressed within 10 years compared with 18/94 and 28/39 of original diagnoses. Progression correlated with p53 positivity.

CONCLUSION

The Vienna classification is useful and reproducible in BO. Consensus diagnosis by gastrointestinal pathologists produces high specificity and predictive value, even for LGD. p53 immunohistochemistry assists in diagnosis in difficult cases and predicts progression.

Similarity of aberrant DNA methylation in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma

Background

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the metaplastic replacement of squamous with columnar epithelium in the esophagus, as a result of reflux. It is the major risk factor for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Methylation of CpG dinucleotides of normally unmethylated genes is associated with silencing of their expression, and is common in EAC. This study was designed to determine at what stage, in the progression from BE to EAC, methylation of key genes occurs.

Results

We examined nine genes (APC, CDKN2A, ID4, MGMT, RBP1, RUNX3, SFRP1, TIMP3, and TMEFF2), frequently methylated in multiple cancer types, in a panel of squamous (19 biopsies from patients without BE or EAC, 16 from patients with BE, 21 from patients with EAC), BE (40 metaplastic, seven high grade dysplastic) and 37 EAC tissues. The methylation frequency, the percentage of samples that had any extent of methylation, for each of the nine genes in the EAC (95%, 59%, 76%, 57%, 70%, 73%, 95%, 74% and 83% respectively) was significantly higher than in any of the squamous groups. The methylation frequency for each of the nine genes in the metaplastic BE (95%, 28%, 78%, 48%, 58%, 48%, 93%, 88% and 75% respectively) was significantly higher than in the squamous samples except for CDKN2A and RBP1. The methylation frequency did not differ between BE and EAC samples, except for CDKN2A and RUNX3 which were significantly higher in EAC. The methylation extent was an estimate of both the number of methylated alleles and the density of methylation on these alleles. This was significantly greater in EAC than in metaplastic BE for all genes except APC, MGMT and TIMP3. There was no significant difference in methylation extent for any gene between high grade dysplastic BE and EAC.

Conclusion

We found significant methylation in metaplastic BE, which for seven of the nine genes studied did not differ in frequency from that found in EAC. This is also the first report of gene silencing by methylation of ID4 in BE or EAC. This study suggests that metaplastic BE is a highly abnormal tissue, more similar to cancer tissue than to normal epithelium.

Poor interobserver agreement in the distinction of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in pretreatment Barrett's esophagus biopsies

OBJECTIVE

Grading Barrett's dysplasia at the lower end of the metaplasia-dysplasia spectrum (negative, indefinite, and low-grade dysplasia) suffers from poor interobserver agreement, even among gastrointestinal pathologists. Data evaluating interobserver agreement in Barrett's mucosal biopsies with changes at the upper end of the dysplasia spectrum (high-grade dysplasia, intramucosal, and submucosal adenocarcinoma) have not been published. The accurate categorization of pretreatment biopsies drives therapeutic decision making, but if the diagnostic distinction between cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's biopsies is inconsistent, then the use of these diagnoses to make management decisions is suspect. To this end, our aim was to assess interobserver reproducibility among a group of gastrointestinal pathologists in the interpretation of preresection biopsies.

METHODS

All study pathologists agreed upon the histologic criteria distinguishing four diagnostic categories, including high-grade dysplasia; high-grade dysplasia with marked distortion of glandular architecture, cannot exclude intramucosal adenocarcinoma; intramucosal adenocarcinoma; and submucosally invasive adenocarcinoma. The histologic criteria were used to independently review preresection biopsies from 163 consecutive Barrett's esophagus patients with at least high-grade dysplasia who ultimately underwent esophagectomy. Reviewers recorded the specific histologic criteria used to categorize each case and Kappa statistics were calculated to assess interobserver agreement.

RESULTS

Using kappa statistics, the overall agreement was only fair (kappa= 0.30). Agreement for high-grade dysplasia was moderate (kappa= 0.47), while agreement for high-grade dysplasia with marked architectural distortion, cannot exclude intramucosal adenocarcinoma and intramucosal adenocarcinoma were only fair (kappa= 0.21 and 0.30, respectively) and agreement for submucosal adenocarcinoma was poor (kappa= 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall poor interobserver reproducibility among gastrointestinal pathologists who see a high volume of Barrett's cases calls into question treatment regimens based on the assumption that high-grade dysplasia, intramucosal adenocarcinoma, and submucosal adenocarcinoma can reliably be distinguished in biopsy specimens.

Assessment of chromosomal gains as compared to DNA content changes is more useful to detect dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus brush cytology specimens

Abnormal DNA ploidy status has been suggested as a prognostic factor for Barrett's esophagus progression into esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The aim of the study was to compare image cytometry DNA analysis (ICDA) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in the assessment of DNA ploidy status in Barrett's esophagus (BE), and to determine the value of these abnormalities as an adjunct to conventional cytology in detection of dysplasia and EAC. Brush cytology specimens of 90 BE patients were examined using ICDA and FISH with peri-centromeric probes for chromosomes 7 and 17. The results of ICDA and FISH were compared with each other, and with dysplasia grade or EAC as determined by histology and cytology. FISH and ICDA detected abnormalities in 41% (37/90) and 22% (19/90) of the BE cases, respectively. Gains of chromosome 7 and/or 17 were present in 13% of nondysplasia cases, which further increased with dysplasia stage, while overall DNA content aneuploidy was detected predominantly in high grade dysplasia (HGD) and EAC. Using FISH results combined with cytology, we were able to identify IND/LGD (indefinite/ low grade dysplasia) with a sensitivity and specificity of 75 and 76%, respectively. FISH alone detected HGD/EAC with a high sensitivity and specificity of 85 and 84%, which was superior to that of cytology alone. Thus, FISH is more sensitive than ICDA to detect chromosomal abnormalities in BE brush cytology specimens. FISH detects chromosomal gains in early stages of BE and represents a valuable adjunct to conventional cytology to detect dysplasia or EAC.

A comparison of conventional cytology, DNA ploidy analysis, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett's esophagus

New detection methods with prognostic power are needed for early identification of dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). This study assessed the relative sensitivity and specificity of conventional cytology, DNA ploidy analysis with digital image analysis (DIA), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in endoscopic brushing specimens from 92 patients undergoing endoscopic surveillance for BE. FISH used probes to 8q24 (C-MYC), 9p21 (P16), 17q12 (HER2), and 20q13. Four-quadrant biopsies taken every centimeter throughout visible Barrett's mucosa were used as the gold standard. The sensitivity of cytology, DIA, and FISH for low-grade dysplasia was 5%, 5%, and 50%, respectively; for high-grade dysplasia (HGD), 32%, 45%, and 82%, respectively; and for EA, 45%, 45%, and 100%, respectively. FISH was more sensitive (P < .05) than cytology and DIA for low-grade dysplasia, HGD, and EA. The specificity of cytology, DIA, and FISH among patients (n = 14) with tissue showing only benign squamous mucosa was 93%, 86%, and 100% (P = .22), respectively. All patients with a polysomic FISH result had HGD and/or EA within 6 months (n = 33). There was a significant difference between FISH categories (negative, 9p21 loss, gain of a single locus, and polysomy) for progression to HGD/EA (P < .001). These findings suggest that FISH has high sensitivity for the detection of dysplasia and EA in BE patients, with the power to stratify patients by FISH abnormality for progression to HGD/EA. Additional studies are needed to further evaluate the clinical use of FISH.

Gains and amplifications of c-myc, EGFR, and 20.q13 loci in the no dysplasia-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence of Barrett's esophagus

The progression of Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma is often characterized by the accumulation of genetic abnormalities. The goal was to evaluate the copy number alterations of several oncogene loci, including 7p12 [epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)], 8q24 (c-myc), and 20q13 in the sequence of no dysplasia-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma of Barrett's esophagus. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with DNA probes for the centromeric region of chromosome 7 and the locus-specific regions of 7p12 (EGFR), 8q24 (c-myc), and 20q13 was applied on 99 brush cytology specimens of patients with Barrett's esophagus with different stages of dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma. Gains (3-4 copies) of chromosome 17, 8q24 (c-myc), and 20q.13 loci were found in the low frequencies in nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Their frequencies increased with the stage of dysplasia and reached a high incidence in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Amplification (>4 copies) of at least 1 of the loci was observed in 14% of high-grade dysplasia and increased to 50% in esophageal adenocarcinoma (P = 0.015). The most frequently amplified locus was c-myc (18%), followed by 20q13 (13%) and EGFR (11%) in the high-grade dysplasia/esophageal adenocarcinoma cases. High amplification levels (>10 copies) of the loci were more frequent in esophageal adenocarcinoma (72%) compared with high-grade dysplasia (20%; P = 0.049). Amplifications of the c-myc, EGFR, and 20q12 loci may serve as diagnostic markers to identify patients with Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma. Gains of the loci might be of value as prognostic markers because they are already present in nondysplasia cases and may precede the later event of the amplification as observed in high-grade dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Aneuploidy in upper gastro-intestinal tract cancers--a potential prognostic marker?

Chromosomal instability manifesting as aneuploidy is the most frequently observed abnormality in solid tumours. However, the role of aneuploidy as a cause or consequence of cancer remains a controversial topic. In this review, we focus on the karyotypic imbalances recorded for cancers of the upper gastro-intestinal (GI) tract, together with their associated pre-malignant lesions and the potential of aneuploidy as a clinical tool for patient management. Numeric chromosomal aberrations are common throughout gastro-oesophageal cancers and their precursor lesions. Additionally, specific chromosomal aneusomies have been identified as early changes in pre-dysplastic tissues suggesting they may be actively involved in driving tumourigenesis. As a progressive increase in the severity of aneuploidy with neoplastic progression has also been observed, it has thus been shown to be a useful prognostic indicator for patient classification as low or high-risk cases for cancer development. However, the biological basis for the aneuploidy in cancers of the upper GI tract needs to be established to understand its consequences and role during carcinogenesis, which is necessary for improving diagnostics and establishing novel targeted therapies.

Efficient automated assessment of genetic abnormalities detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization on brush cytology in a Barrett esophagus surveillance population

BACKGROUND

Automated assessment of genetic abnormalities detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in brush cytology specimens from patients with Barrett esophagus (BE) may enhance the clinical applicability of this methodology. The objectives of this study were to validate a novel, automated, proprietary system (CytoVison SPOT AX) for the assessment of FISH abnormalities in BE brush cytology and, subsequently, to use this automated method for screening of a BE surveillance cohort.

METHODS

FISH with DNA probes for chromosomes 9, 17, and Y, and for the 9p21 (p16), 17q11.2 (Her2/neu), and 17p13.1 (p53) loci was applied on brush cytology specimens from a surveillance cohort of 151 patients with BE. Validation of the automated system was performed by comparison of the automated FISH results with manual scores for the first 60 patients.

RESULTS

There was 98% concordance between manual and automated FISH analysis with kappa values from 0.49 to 1 for the different probes. The loss of 17p13.1 (p53) was observed in only 5% of patients with no dysplasia (ND) and in 9% of patients with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) but increased to 46% in patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) (P < .005; Fisher exact test). Chromosomes 9 and 17 were observed in 6% of patients with ND, in 21% of patients with LGD, and in 62% of patients with HGD (P < .05). Ten percent of patients with ND had loss of the Y chromosome, which increased to 27% in patients with HGD (P< .05). The amplification of 17q11.2 (Her2/neu) was detected in 62% of patients with HGD (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The current investigation indicated that the CytoVison SPOT AX is an objective, efficient system for the analysis of DNA-FISH on BE brush cytology and is applicable for analyzing large populations of BE patients. In the current study cohort, the loss of 17p13.1 (p53), Y chromosome loss, and polysomy of chromosomes 17 and 9 were correlated with increasing grade of dysplasia in patients with BE.

Cyclin A immunocytology as a risk stratification tool for Barrett's esophagus surveillance

PURPOSE

Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) by histopathologic biopsy assessment is suboptimal. A proliferation marker, minichromosome maintenance protein 2, has potential as a biomarker but lacks specificity. We hypothesized that cyclin A, which detects a proportion of proliferating cells, would be more specific. Because cytologic sampling has clinical advantages, we also evaluated the efficacy of cyclin A in endoscopic brushing samples.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A cross-sectional cyclin A immunostaining study was done in 77 patients attending for BE surveillance and 17 patients undergoing evaluation of esophageal adenocarcinoma. The control tissues were as follows: 30 squamous esophagus, 20 gastric antrum, and 13 duodenum. A nested case-control study was done within the same surveillance cohort (16 progressors compared with 32 matched controls) to determine the relative risk for progression. Immunocytology was done for endoscopic brushings collected prospectively from 75 BE +/- dysplasia and 33 esophageal adenocarcinomas.

RESULTS

Surface expression of cyclin A in BE samples correlated with the degree of dysplasia (P = 0.016). In the case-control cohort, patients with biopsies expressing cyclin A at the surface were more likely to progress to adenocarcinoma than those who did not (odds ratio, 7.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-30.7). The sensitivity and specificity of cyclin A expression in brushings for the detection of high-grade dysplasia and cancer patients were 97.8% and 58.7%, respectively. The associated negative predictive value was 97.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclin A immunopositivity correlates with cancer risk. Application of this marker to endoscopic brushings could be used as a first step to identify BE patients with the highest risk of progression.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization to evaluate dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Histological disagreement is frequent in the diagnosis and grading of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE).

AIMS

To identify selective markers for dysplasia in BE and to improve the differentiation between low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD).

METHODS

Eight BE esophageal mucosectomies (7 males) were analyzed by conventional histology and immunohistochemistry for p53 and Fluorescence In situ Hybridization (FISH) for chromosomes X, Y, 4, 8, 17, 18. The female mucosectomy was considered as a control for the XY probe.

RESULTS

p53 confirmed multifocal dysplasia in all cases. All patients displayed increased aneusomy for chromosomes 4, 8, 17 and 18 along the sequence of cancer progression. There was also a trend for chromosome 8 to be below the FISH cutoff; 50% of cases showed aneusomy for chromosome 18 in areas with differing grades of dysplasia. Aneusomy was increased for chromosomes 4 and 17, to a similar extent in LGD and HGD. In male specimens, the presence of chromosome Y was revealed in Barrett's mucosa and LGD, but not in HGD and intramucosal carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

FISH in BE may be useful diagnostic to confirm the diagnosis of HGD. Loss of chromosome Y might be a selective marker of HGD in male patients.

NSAIDs modulate CDKN2A, TP53, and DNA content risk for progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Somatic genetic CDKN2A, TP53, and DNA content abnormalities are common in many human cancers and their precursors, including esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) and Barrett's esophagus (BE), conditions for which aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been proposed as possible chemopreventive agents; however, little is known about the ability of a biomarker panel to predict progression to cancer nor how NSAID use may modulate progression. We aimed to evaluate somatic genetic abnormalities with NSAIDs as predictors of EA in a prospective cohort study of patients with BE.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Esophageal biopsies from 243 patients with BE were evaluated at baseline for TP53 and CDKN2A (p16) alterations, tetraploidy, and aneuploidy using sequencing; loss of heterozygosity (LOH); methylation-specific PCR; and flow cytometry. At 10 y, all abnormalities, except CDKN2A mutation and methylation, contributed to EA risk significantly by univariate analysis, ranging from 17p LOH (relative risk [RR] = 10.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.2-21.3, p < 0.001) to 9p LOH (RR = 2.6; 95% CI 1.1-6.0, p = 0.03). A panel of abnormalities including 17p LOH, DNA content tetraploidy and aneuploidy, and 9p LOH was the best predictor of EA (RR = 38.7; 95% CI 10.8-138.5, p < 0.001). Patients with no baseline abnormality had a 12% 10-y cumulative EA incidence, whereas patients with 17p LOH, DNA content abnormalities, and 9p LOH had at least a 79.1% 10-y EA incidence. In patients with zero, one, two, or three baseline panel abnormalities, there was a significant trend toward EA risk reduction among NSAID users compared to nonusers (p = 0.01). The strongest protective effect was seen in participants with multiple genetic abnormalities, with NSAID nonusers having an observed 10-y EA risk of 79%, compared to 30% for NSAID users (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of 17p LOH, 9p LOH, and DNA content abnormalities provided better EA risk prediction than any single TP53, CDKN2A, or DNA content lesion alone. NSAIDs are associated with reduced EA risk, especially in patients with multiple high-risk molecular abnormalities.

Chromosome 11 aneusomy in esophageal cancers and precancerous lesions- an early event in neoplastic transformation: An interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization study from south India

AIM: To detect aneusomic changes with respect to chromosome 11 copy number in esophageal precancers and cancers wherein the generation of cancer-specific phenotypes is believed to be associated with specific chromosomal aneuploidies.

METHODS: We performed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on esophageal tissue paraffin sections to analyze changes in chromosome 11 copy number using apotome-generated images by optical sectioning microscopy. Sections were prepared from esophageal tumor tissue, tissues showing preneoplastic changes and histologically normal tissues (control) obtained from patients referred to the clinic for endoscopic evaluation.

RESULTS: Our results demonstrated that aneusomy was seen in all the cancers and preneoplastic tissues, while none of the controls showed aneusomic cells. There was no increase in aneusomy from precancers to cancers.

CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that evaluation of chromosome 11 aneusomy in esophageal tissue using FISH with an appropriate signal capture-analysis system, can be used as an ancillary molecular marker predictive of early neoplastic changes. Future studies can be directed towards the genes on chromosome 11, which may play a role in the neoplastic transformation of esophageal precancerous lesions to cancers.

The development of a fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for the detection of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus

The goal of this study was to identify a set of fluorescence in situ hybridization probes for the detection of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett's esophagus. We examined 170 brushing specimens from 138 patients with Barrett's esophagus or a history of Barrett's esophagus using fluorescence in situ hybridization with probes to 5p15, 5q21-22, centromere 7, 7p12, 8q24.12-13, centromere 9, 9p21, centromere 17, 17p13.1, 17q11.2-12, 20q13.2, and centromere Y. Receiver-operator curves were used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of various four-probe combinations for detecting low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic biopsy results were used as the gold standard. Numerous four-probe combinations provided a similarly high sensitivity and specificity. Of these, a set consisting of probes to 8q24, 9p21, 17q11.2, and 20q13.2 was found to have a sensitivity and specificity, respectively, of 70% and 89% for low-grade dysplasia, 84% and 93% for high-grade dysplasia, and 94% and 93% for esophageal adenocarcinoma. This probe set was chosen for future prospective clinical evaluations based on its high sensitivity and specificity, its ability to distinguish adenocarcinoma and high-grade or low-grade dysplasia from lesser diagnostic categories, and the favorable signal quality for each of the probes.

FISH detection of t(14;18) in follicular lymphoma on Papanicolaou-stained archival cytology slides

BACKGROUND

The t(14;18)(q32;q21) translocation is present in about 85% of follicular lymphomas (FL) and can be identified using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In the diagnostic laboratory setting, the cytologic archival material consists of stained slides, and only rarely is material saved for molecular testing. The authors proposed FISH for FL using Papanicolaou-stained archival cytology material as a practical ancillary technique for diagnosing FL.

METHODS

Cases included 35 FL, 6 small lymphocytic lymphomas/chronic lymphocytic leukemias (SLL/CLL), 4 mantle cell lymphomas (MCL), 4 marginal zone lymphomas (MZL), 1 lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL), and 10 reactive lymphoid tissues (RLT). FISH was performed on Papanicolaou-stained archival cytology slides using probes for immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) on chromosome 14 and BCL2 on chromosome 18.

RESULTS

In all, 25 of 32 (81%) FL cases exhibited the t(14;18) translocation, whereas 7 of 32 (19%) lacked the translocation. No cases of non-FL were positive for t(14;18). This series shows a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 100% for detecting the t(14;18) translocation as a diagnostic tool in FL.

CONCLUSIONS

When performed on Papanicolaou-stained cytology slides, FISH for t(14;18) is relatively sensitive and quite specific for FL. These findings are similar to those reported on other specimens, such as paraffin-embedded tissue and unstained cytology slides. The authors proposed that their technique would allow the pathologist and clinician the flexibility to utilize previously stained fine-needle aspiration slides for FISH evaluation.

Genetic mechanisms of TP53 loss of heterozygosity in Barrett's esophagus: implications for biomarker validation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

17p (TP53) loss of heterozygosity (LOH) has been reported to be predictive of progression from Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma, but the mechanism by which TP53 LOH develops is unknown. It could be (a) DNA deletion, (b) LOH without copy number change, or (c) tetraploidy followed by genetic loss. If an alternative biomarker assay, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), provided equivalent results, then translation to the clinic might be accelerated, because LOH genotyping is presently limited to research centers.

METHODS

We evaluated mechanisms of TP53 LOH to determine if FISH and TP53 LOH provided equivalent results on the same flow-sorted samples (n = 43) representing established stages of clonal progression (diploid, diploid with TP53 LOH, aneuploid) in 19 esophagectomy specimens.

RESULTS

LOH developed by all three mechanisms: 32% had DNA deletions, 32% had no copy number change, and 37% had FISH patterns consistent with a tetraploid intermediate followed by genetic loss. Thus, FISH and LOH are not equivalent (P < 0.000001).

CONCLUSIONS

LOH develops by multiple chromosome mechanisms in Barrett's esophagus, all of which can be detected by genotyping. FISH cannot detect LOH without copy number change, and dual-probe FISH is required to detect the complex genetic changes associated with a tetraploid intermediate. Alternative biomarker assay development should be guided by appreciation and evaluation of the biological mechanisms generating the biomarker abnormality to detect potential sources of discordance. FISH will require validation in adequately powered longitudinal studies before implementation as a clinical diagnostic for esophageal adenocarcinoma risk prediction.

Multistage carcinogenesis in Barrett's esophagus

The multistage carcinogenesis of esophageal adenocarcinoma is a process of clonal evolution within Barrett's esophagus neoplasms. The initiating event for Barrett's esophagus is unknown, but is associated with chronic gastric reflux which probably also promotes progression. Inactivation of both alleles of CDKN2A appear to be early events causing clonal expansion. Clones with TP53 inactivated expand if they have already inactivated CDKN2A. After TP53 has been inactivated, tetraploid and aneuploid clones tend to develop. The final events that lead to invasion and metastasis are unknown. Evolutionary biology provides important tools to understand clonal evolution in progression and cancer prevention.

p53 and the malignant progression of Barrett's esophagus

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a metaplastic disorder in which specialized columnar epithelium replaces healthy squamous epithelium (intestinal metaplasia). Even though its pathophysiology and the steps of its neoplastic progression are not completely understood, BE can be considered as a complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Given that esophageal adenocarcinoma, which is continually increasing in the Western world, still has a poor prognosis and suffers from late diagnosis, and because BE is a precancerous lesion, there is a strong need for good molecular markers of malignant progression in Barrett's metaplasia (BM). The aim of this review is to examine the published data regarding the role that assessment of p53 may play in the management of BE, trying to understand if it may be a useful marker to early diagnose BE malignant transformation.

Barrett esophagus: will effective treatment prevent the risk of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma?

Barrett esophagus is a complication of long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and is the well-recognized premalignant condition for the majority of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas. Although duration of gastroesophageal reflux (GER), male sex, and, possibly, a strong family history are directly related to risk of Barrett esophagus, the role of screening in those with GERD and surveillance in those with confirmed Barrett syndrome remains controversial. Acid suppression with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy plays a pivotal role in the management of symptoms in persons with chronic GER and Barrett esophagus. Although there is no conclusive evidence for the role of PPIs in regression of Barrett epithelium or prevention of dysplasia, longer-term studies that titrate the dose to normalization of esophageal pH may proffer different data in the future. Although highly touted in the literature, surgical and endoscopic ablation therapies are limited by several factors, including high rates of symptom recurrence, persistently abnormal pH values, need for repeat surgery, and, in the case of endoscopic therapy, residual Barrett metaplasia that can progress to high-grade dysplasia or cancer. These invasive interventions should only be considered after consultation with a gastroenterologist. Cancer chemoprevention strategies are just emerging, and their roles as direct chemoprotectants remain to be determined.