Immunohistochemical expression of CDX2 in primary ovarian mucinous tumors and metastatic mucinous carcinomas involving the ovary: comparison with CK20 and correlation with coordinate expression of CK7

Diagnostic difficulties in the differentiation between an ovarian metastatic low‑grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm and primary ovarian mucinous cancer: A case report and literature review

Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) is a tumor that primarily originates from the appendix and belongs to the family of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMNs). In 50% of female patients, AMNs (particularly LAMNs) have a tendency to metastasize to organs in the genital tract, where the neoplasm can mimic the features of primary ovarian mucinous cancer (POMC). The present case report reviewed the difficulties in differentiating between these two types of tumors. In the present case report, a 61-year-old female patient was admitted to the Second Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Hospital no. 4 at Lublin Medical University (Lublin, Poland) with the diagnosis of a right ovarian mass. After performing ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) scans and laboratory analysis, the patient underwent total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, appendectomy and resection of the Douglas peritoneum. Notably, the postoperative pathological assessment revealed LAMN with metastases to the right ovary and omentum. Immunohistochemically, cytokeratin 20 and caudal type homeobox 2 both stained positively, whereas paired box gene 8 stained negatively. After surgery, the patient received the recommended hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy at the Department of Surgical Oncology at Lublin Medical University. After 1 year, a CT scan was performed, which indicated no evidence of recurrent disease. In conclusion, observations from the present case report suggest that gynecologists should be conscious of the possibility of malignancies of gastrointestinal origin in cases of ovarian tumors instead of making direct assumptions of POMC. If the mucinous mass involves the base of the appendix or if there is a suspicion of positive margins, then cytoreductive surgery and right-sided hemicolectomy must be performed. In addition, identifying the origin of mucinous tumors in the right ovary and/or the appendix requires the histopathological examination of a panel of markers using immunohistochemistry.

Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of primary mucinous ovarian cancer from metastatic ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To develop a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-based radiomics nomogram and evaluate its performance in differentiating primary mucinous ovarian cancer (PMOC) from metastatic ovarian cancer (MOC).

METHODS

A total of 194 patients with PMOC (n = 72) and MOC (n = 122) confirmed by histology were randomly divided into the primary cohort (n = 137) and validation cohort (n = 57). Radiomics features were extracted from axial fat-saturated T2-weighted imaging (FS-T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI) sequences of each lesion. The effective features were selected by minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to develop a radiomics model. Combined with clinical features, multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to develop a radiomics nomogram. The efficiency of nomogram was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and compared using DeLong test. Finally, the goodness of fit and clinical benefit of nomogram were assessed by calibration curves and decision curve analysis, respectively.

RESULTS

The radiomics nomogram, by combining the mpMRI radiomics features with clinical features, yielded area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.931 and 0.934 in the primary and validation cohorts, respectively. The predictive performance of the radiomics nomogram was significantly superior to the radiomics model (0.931 vs. 0.870, P = 0.004; 0.934 vs. 0.844, P = 0.032), the clinical model (0.931 vs. 0.858, P = 0.005; 0.934 vs. 0.847, P = 0.030), and radiologists (all P < 0.05) in the primary and validation cohorts, respectively. The decision curve analysis revealed that the nomogram could provide higher net benefit to patients.

CONCLUSION

The mpMRI-based radiomics nomogram exhibited notable predictive performance in differentiating PMOC from MOC, emerging as a non-invasive preoperative imaging approach.

Efficacy of Touch Imprint Cytology in Intraoperative Diagnosis of Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Lung: A Case Report and Literature Review

A preoperative diagnosis of the peripheral small lung nodule is often difficult, and an intraoperative frozen section diagnosis (FSD) is performed to guide treatment strategy. However, invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) is prone to be overlooked because of the low sample quality and weak atypia. We herein report a case of IMA, in which touch imprint cytology (TIC) revealed diagnostic efficacy. A 74-year-old male with a small, subsolid nodule in the right upper lobe underwent a thoracoscopic wedge resection. A grayish brown, 10 × 7 mm-sized nodule was observed on the cut surface. Intraoperative FSD revealed lung tissue with mild alveolar septal thickening and stromal fibrosis but without overt atypia. Meanwhile, TIC revealed mucus and a few epithelial cells with intranuclear inclusions, which pathologists evaluated as reactive. Finally, focal organizing pneumonia was tentatively diagnosed, and surgery was finished without any additional resection. However, permanent section diagnosis revealed a microinvasive mucinous adenocarcinoma. Nuclear inclusions were confirmed in tumor cells. In the intraoperative setting, TIC may be more advantageous than FSD in observing nuclear inclusions and mucus. Mucinous background and nuclear inclusion on TIC may suggest IMA even if FSD does not suggest malignancy in an intraoperative diagnosis of the peripheral small lung nodule.

An Update on the Role of Immunohistochemistry in the Evaluation of Pancreatic/Liver/Gastrointestinal Luminal Tract Disorders

CONTEXT.—

Immunohistochemistry serves as an ancillary diagnostic tool for a wide variety of neoplastic and nonneoplastic disorders, including infections, workup of inflammatory conditions, and subtyping neoplasms of the pancreas/liver/gastrointestinal luminal tract. In addition, immunohistochemistry is also used to detect a variety of prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers for carcinomas of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract.

OBJECTIVE.—

To highlight an update on the role of immunohistochemistry in the evaluation of pancreatic/liver/gastrointestinal luminal tract disorders.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review and authors' research data and personal practice experience were used.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool, assisting in the diagnosis of problematic tumors and benign lesions of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract, and also in the prediction of prognosis and therapeutic response for carcinomas of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract.

Krukenberg Tumor Related to Gallbladder Cancer in a Young Woman: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

A gallbladder tumor is a rare condition, which usually spreads to the liver, lymph nodes, and other organs. A Krukenberg tumor, derived from the biliary tract and gallbladder cancers (GBCs), is an uncommon finding in routine clinical practice. Here, a case of a young woman with a Krukenberg tumor related to a previous diagnosis of GBC is reported. Differential diagnosis of an ovarian malignant lesion is challenging for both clinicians and pathologists. In order to provide a proper diagnosis, integrated multidisciplinary management is essential. The occurrence of Krukenberg tumors should be evaluated in the management of GBC, even if this is rare in clinical practice.

Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Origin: Application of Immunohistochemistry With Emphasis to Different Cytokeratin 7 and 20 Staining Patterns

BACKGROUND

Although the primary origin of some carcinomas may be obscure to clinicians, its identification is crucial as it affects prognosis and treatment (especially novel targeted therapies). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) may be helpful in identifying the primary origin of carcinomas. This retrospective survey aimed to evaluate the frequency and accuracy of each IHC marker used to determine the origin of carcinomas.

METHODS

The review of pathology department archives revealed 307 cases of cancer of unknown primary origin (CUP) between 2015 and 2020, which were accessible in the department archives. Demographic information, site of biopsy, clinical and pathologic diagnoses, and IHC results of the patients were collected.

RESULTS

The patients included 157 (51.15%) men and 150 (48.85%) women. The age of the patients ranged from 14 to 92 years, including 106 (34.5%) expired cases. In 27% of cases, the primary origin of carcinoma remained unknown. The agreement between pathologic and clinical diagnoses was 59%. The most common pattern of cytokeratin (CK) expression in CUP was CK7+/CK20- (55.3%), followed by CK7-/CK20- (19%), CK7+/CK20+ (15%), and CK7-/CK20+ (10.7%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The IHC analysis may improve the diagnosis of CUPs. However, the origin of some cases remains unknown despite an IHC analysis, thereby necessitating the use of more diagnostic procedures or gene expression studies for reaching a definitive diagnosis.

Mucinous carcinoma of the breast: distinctive histopathologic and genetic characteristics

Mucinous carcinoma is a rare histologic type of breast cancer that, when classified with favorable histology, can be treated with different therapeutic options. This study reviews the histologic findings of mucinous carcinoma that support or exclude favorable histology and emphasizes the necessity of an appropriate gross examination with radiologic findings for an accurate diagnosis. In addition, unusual findings such as micropapillary arrangements and lobular differentiation in mucinous carcinoma and their implications for prognosis and treatment are reviewed. Mucinous carcinoma involves upregulation of MUC2, a mucus-associated gene common in mucinous carcinoma of the breast as well as various other organs. In mucinous carcinoma, the fraction of genome altered and tumor mutation burden are lower than those of invasive carcinoma of no special type, the most common histology of breast cancer. In addition, the genetic alterations found in mucinous carcinoma are diverse, unlike the pathognomonic genetic alterations observed in other histologic types of breast cancer. These genetic features support the importance of conventional microscopic evaluations for the pathologic differential diagnosis of mucinous carcinoma of the breast in routine practice. A variety of breast lesions, including mucinous cystadenocarcinoma and mucocele-like lesions, as well as mucinous carcinoma from other organs, can mimic mucinous carcinoma of the breast. In order to obtain an accurate pathologic diagnosis, careful evaluation of the overall histopathologic characteristics and ancillary testing are required to provide information on appropriate treatment and prognosis.

Mucinous Borderline Tumor Associated with Mesonephric-like Proliferation: Further Evidence for a Possible New Origin of Ovarian Mucinous Neoplasms

Some ovarian mucinous tumors are thought to originate from Brenner tumors and teratomas; however, data are limited on what could be the origin for the remaining tumors. We report a new case of ovarian mucinous borderline tumor/atypical proliferative mucinous tumor (MBT/APMT) co-existing with a mesonephric-like proliferation (MLP)/mesonephric-like hyperplasia (MLH). The patient was a 58-year-old woman who presented with a pelvic mass and abdominal pain. Pathology demonstrated an 11 cm MBT/APMT in the left ovary. In addition, the tumor contained one focal area (<1% of total tumor volume) of MLP/hyperplasia adjacent to, or intimately admixed with, mucinous epithelium, with an immunophenotype of diffuse Pax8 and Gata3 expression and negative TTF-1, ER, and PR staining. Pax8 was also weakly positive in the MBT/APMT component. Some mesonephric-like glands partially exhibited gastrointestinal-type mucinous metaplasia/differentiation. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based Sanger sequencing demonstrated that a KRAS G12V mutation was present in both MLP/MLH and MBT/APMT components, providing further evidence to support their clonal relationship. We previously reported a series of similar cases and demonstrated a novel association between MLP, mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma and ovarian mucinous tumor. It is conceivable that benign MLPs may have ability to differentiate to lineage-specific mucinous lesions, and, as such, they may serve as a possible new origin of some ovarian mucinous neoplasms; in particular, Pax8-positive tumors. The current case provides additional evidence to support this theory.

Sinonasal mixed transitional epithelial-seromucinous papillary glandular neoplasms with BRAF p.V600E mutations - sinonasal analogues to the sialadenoma papilliferum family tumors

Sinonasal non-intestinal type adenocarcinoma (non-ITAC) is a heterogeneous category that may benefit from improved taxonomy. With the recognition that most non-ITAC are phenotypically seromucinous, stratification may be improved by applying salivary type morphologic criteria and molecular findings. We report two cases of papillary seromucinous adenocarcinoma with sinonasal papilloma-like surface components that show histologic and molecular features analogous to the salivary sialadenoma papilliferum family of tumors. Case 1 concerns a 50-year-old female who presented with a left anterior nasoethmoid polyp, while case 2 is that of a 74 year old female with nasal polyposis. Histologically, both cases demonstrated a surface transitional sinonasal papilloma-like component (more prominent in case 2) with a deeper bilayered glandular component showing papillary and tufted micropapillary growth of monomorphic columnar to cuboidal cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm. Case 1 also showed a deep cribriform/microcystic component. Immunostains showed a delimiting p63/p40 positive basal layer around the SOX-10 positive glandular elements, while the transitional sinonasal papilloma-like components were diffusely p63/p40 positive. Like sialadenoma papilliferum and related tumors, both cases demonstrated BRAF p.V600E mutations in both components and no other alterations. The patients remain disease free at 9 and 19 months respectively. Our cases illustrate a novel sinonasal lesion and suggest that improved morphologic and molecular categorization may refine and reduce the category of non-ITAC.

Metastatic Ovarian Mucinous Carcinoma Presenting as Ileocecal Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report

Colorectal invasion is an unusual late-stage presentation of metastatic primary mucinous ovarian cancer. In this article, we report a fatal case of a 65-year-old female who presented to our clinic with progressive weight loss, severe constipation, and postprandial early satiety. She underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy. Direct visualization during colonoscopy revealed acute inflammation with ulceration and highly atypical glands in the ileocecal valve. The initial biopsy was unremarkable, and a repeat biopsy was performed due to high suspicion of malignancy. The repeat biopsy revealed poorly differentiated, invasive colon adenocarcinoma with partial mucinous features. The patient was referred to the surgery service. While planning for surgical resection, they obtained a CT abdomen and pelvis, which revealed a large ovarian mass and peritoneal carcinomatosis. Immunohistochemistry for the tumor cells was positive for pancytokeratin and cytokeratin 7, partially positive (up to 20%) for cytokeratin 20 and CDX2, and negative for estrogen receptors, monoclonal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and synaptophysin. This immunophenotypic pattern is strongly consistent with metastatic mucinous carcinoma of ovarian origin.

Novel Therapeutic Strategies for Refractory Ovarian Cancers: Clear Cell and Mucinous Carcinomas

Ovarian cancer has the worst prognosis among gynecological cancers. In particular, clear cell and mucinous carcinomas are less sensitive to chemotherapy. The establishment of new therapies is necessary to improve the treatment outcomes for these carcinomas. In previous clinical studies, chemotherapy with cytotoxic anticancer drugs has failed to demonstrate better treatment outcomes than paclitaxel + carboplatin therapy. In recent years, attention has been focused on treatment with molecular target drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors that target newly identified biomarkers. The issues that need to be addressed include the most appropriate combination of therapies, identifying patients who may benefit from each therapy, and how results should be incorporated into the standard of care for ovarian clear cell and mucinous carcinomas. In this article, we have reviewed the most promising therapies for ovarian clear cell and mucinous carcinomas, which are regarded as intractable, with an emphasis on therapies currently being investigated in clinical studies.

Gynaecological or gastrointestinal origin? Recognising Müllerian neoplasms with gastrointestinal phenotype and determining the primary site in selected entities

Recognising metastatic gastrointestinal and pancreatobiliary tumours to gynaecological sites may be challenging, as primary Müllerian tumours can demonstrate similar histological features. Endocervical adenocarcinomas can be of gastric and intestinal types, endometrial lesions may show gastrointestinal phenotype, and finally, mucinous tumours with secondary involvement of the ovaries may mimic primary neoplasms. The aim of this review is to address selected neoplastic entities of the gynaecological tract with gastric and intestinal differentiation and provide helpful clinical and pathological parameters for the diagnosis. A brief overview of metastatic tumours originating from the gastrointestinal and pancreaticobiliary tracts is also provided, including the most common pathological features.

Ovarian Metastasis from Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a high propensity for systemic dissemination. Ovarian metastases are rare and poorly described.

METHODS

We identified PDAC cases with ovarian metastasis from a prospectively maintained registry. We reported on the association between outcomes and clinicopathologic factors. Recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve patients with PDAC and synchronous or metachronous ovarian metastases were identified. Nine patients (75%) underwent pancreatectomy for localized PDAC and developed metachronous ovarian recurrence. The median OS for all patients was 25.4 (IQR:15.4-82.9) months. For the nine patients with metachronous ovarian metastasis, the median RFS and OS were 14.2 (IQR:7.2-58.3) and 44.6 (IQR:18.6-82.9) months, respectively. Nodal disease, poor grade, vascular invasion in the pancreatic primary, and bilateral ovarian disease tended to confer worse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Patients with resected PDAC and ovarian recurrence tend to have a comparable disease course to more common patterns of recurrence. Primaries with nodal disease, poorer grade, vascular invasion, and bilateral ovarian disease were indicative of more aggressive disease biology. The ideal management remains largely unknown, and future collaborative efforts should optimize therapeutic strategies.

Is cell block technique useful to predict histological type in patients with ovarian mass and/or body cavity fluids?

The cell block (CB) technique is a generalized method utilized for the diagnostic evaluation of body cavity fluids. Ascites cytology is one of the most important diagnostic processes for epithelial ovarian cancer. However, in clinical practice, the usefulness of the CB method to diagnose this tumor remains unelucidated. Between 2008 and 2017, 15 peritoneal or pleural fluid samples obtained from patients with ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma or other gastrointestinal malignancies were preoperatively subjected to a diagnostic evaluation to predict the histological type and original organ. The CBs were made from 10% formalin neutral buffer solution fixed sediments of fluid samples after cytological smears were made by conventional method. Four-μm thickness sections were prepared from the cell blocks and stained with immunohistochemical method, using 16 kinds of antibodies and hematoxylin eosin staining method. The cellularity, architectural patterns, and morphological details were also studied. The median (range) age of patients was 73 (35-87) years. The clinical features were identified as follows: pleural effusion in 4, ovarian mass in 7, peritoneal dissemination in 12, para-aortic nodal swelling in one, and liver tumor in one (some overlapping). Five patients had a history of prior malignancy. Finally, we could accurately diagnose the histological type in 9 patients based on subsequent biopsy, surgery, and autopsy. In all 9 women, the clinical diagnosis, CB diagnosis and final pathological diagnosis were consistent. The CB technique may be a helpful modality for evaluating fluid cytology to obtain a final histopathologic diagnosis.

Primary mucinous ovarian tumors vs. ovarian metastases from gastrointestinal tract, pancreas and biliary tree: a review of current problematics

Background

Making the distinction between primary mucinous and metastatic ovarian tumors is often difficult, especially in tumors with a primary source from the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas and biliary tree. The aim of the following paper is to provide an overview of the problematics, with a focus on the possibilities of the differential diagnosis at the macroscopic, microscopic and immunohistochemical level.

Main body

The three main aspects of mucinous ovarian tumors are described in detail, including the comparison of the available diagnostic algorithms based on the evaluation of mostly macroscopic features, characterization of the spectrum of microscopic features, and a detailed analysis of the immunophenotype comparing 20 antibodies with the assessment of their statistical significance for differential diagnosis purposes. Specific features, including Krukenberg tumor and pseudomyxoma peritonei, are also discussed.

Conclusion

Despite the growing knowledge of the macroscopic and microscopic features of ovarian mucinous tumors and the availability of a wide range of immunohistochemical antibodies useful in this setting, there still remains a group of tumors which cannot be precisely classified without close clinical-pathological cooperation.

Immunohistochemistry features and molecular pathology of appendiceal neoplasms

Primary appendiceal neoplasms (ANs) comprise a heterogeneous group of tumors. The pathology and classification of ANs have been controversial, and thus, a new classification of these neoplasms was published in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors (5th edition, 2019). However, immunohistochemistry (IHC) features of epithelial ANs are not explained in this edition and the limited data on the molecular pathology of these tumors shows inconsistent findings in various studies. It would be useful to identify biomarkers appropriate for each subtype to better aid in treatment selection. Therefore, we reviewed the literature to investigate what is known of the molecular pathology and IHC features of the most frequently diagnosed pathological subtypes of epithelial ANs based on the recent classification. The inconsistencies in research findings regarding the IHC features and molecular pathology of ANs could be due to differences in the number of samples and their collection and preparation as well as to the lack of a universally accepted classification system for these neoplasms. However, the literature shows that epithelial ANs typically stain positive for MUC2, CK20, and CDX2 and that the expression of SATB2 protein could be used as a biomarker for appendix tumor origin. Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms tend to have mutations in KRAS and GNAS but are usually wild-type for BRAF, APC, and P53. Conversely, appendiceal adenocarcinomas are frequently found with mutations in KRAS, GNAS, P53, PIK3CA, and APC, and have significant nuclear expression of β-catenin, loss of nuclear or nuclear and cytoplasmic expression of SMAD4, and loss of cytoplasmic membranous expression of E-cadherin. Goblet cell carcinomas (GCCs) typically stain positive for keratin and mucin markers and are frequently mutated in P53 and chromatin-modifier genes, but they tend to be wild-type for KRAS, GNAS, APC, and PIK3CA. The expression of CK7 and SATB2 proteins is usually negative in appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms and they lack the mutations in common cancer-associated genes including APC, BRAF, SMAD4, and PIK3C. The available data suggest that GCCs have distinct molecular and immunohistochemical features and that they have characteristics more in common with adenocarcinoma than classical neuroendocrine tumors. In addition, MSI does not seem to have a role in the pathogenesis of epithelial ANs because they are rarely detected in these tumors. Finally, hereditary predisposition may have a role in the development of ANs because heterozygous CTNNβ1, NOTCH1, and NOTCH4 germline mutations have recently been identified in low and high grades ANs.

SATB2 in Neoplasms of Lung, Pancreatobiliary, and Gastrointestinal Origins

OBJECTIVES

Special AT-rich binding protein 2 (SATB2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) has high sensitivity and specificity for colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC), but data on its expression in specific subsets of pulmonary, gastric, small bowel, and pancreatobiliary adenocarcinomas (ADCAs) are relatively limited or discordant. We assessed SATB2 expression in a large cohort of ADCAs from these sites to determine its reliability in distinguishing CRC from them.

METHODS

SATB2 IHC was performed on 335 neoplasms, including 40 lung ADCAs, 165 pancreatobiliary neoplasms (34 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms [IPMNs], 19 pancreatic ADCAs, 112 cholangiocarcinomas [CCs]), and 35 gastric, 13 small bowel, 36 ampullary (AMP), and 46 CRC ADCAs. The cases were evaluated for positivity (defined as ≥5% nuclear staining), and an H-score was calculated based on the percentage of SATB2+ cells and staining intensity. Analysis was performed to determine the optimal H-score threshold to separate CRC and non-CRC.

RESULTS

SATB2 was positive in 3% of lung, 2% of CC, 17% of gastric, 38% of small bowel, and 6% of AMP ADCAs. All pancreatic ADCA/IPMNs were negative, and 87% CRCs were positive.

CONCLUSIONS

SATB2 is not entirely specific for colorectal origin and can be expressed in a subset of gastrointestinal ADCAs. It is most useful in the differential of CRC vs lung and pancreatobiliary ADCAs.

Comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis of the gastrointestinal and Müllerian phenotypes of 139 ovarian mucinous cystadenomas

Mucinous cystadenoma is one of the most common benign ovarian neoplasms. The immunophenotypes and histogenetic relationships of mucinous cystadenomas with a Müllerian-type epithelium have not been fully explored. We elucidated the direction of differentiation of the mucinous epithelium that constitutes mucinous cystadenomas. Special attention was paid to the existence of gastrointestinal (GI)-type mucinous epithelium, and its association with background Müllerian-type epithelium. Immunohistochemistry was performed in 139 cases of mucinous cystadenoma to evaluate the expression of Claudin-18 (CLDN18), a novel marker of gastric differentiation; CDX2, a marker of intestinal differentiation; and estrogen receptor (ER), a marker of Müllerian differentiation. We found that GI differentiation characterized by CLDN18 and/or CDX2 positivity was observed in mucinous epithelium of most mucinous cystadenomas (129/139 cases, 93%). In a subset of these cases, the tumor was composed of mucinous epithelium exhibiting an intermediate GI and Müllerian phenotype (CLDN18+/CDX2±/ER+). Of note, in 12 cases, a transition from background Müllerian-type epithelium to mucinous epithelium with GI differentiation was identified. A minor subset (6%) of mucinous cystadenomas was considered a pure Müllerian type because the epithelium exhibited a CLDN18-/CDX2-/ER + immunophenotype. In conclusion, mucinous cystadenomas consist of three major subtypes: GI, Müllerian, and intermediate types. Most mucinous cystadenomas are GI-type, and they should be considered a precursor of GI-type mucinous borderline tumors. The existence of intermediate-type mucinous cystadenomas, and areas of transition from Müllerian-type to GI-type epithelium suggest that GI-type mucinous epithelium can arise from Müllerian duct derivatives or surface epithelium exhibiting Müllerian metaplasia in the ovary.

Transcription factors in epithelial ovarian cancer: histotype-specific drivers and novel therapeutic targets

Transcription factors (TFs) are major contributors to cancer risk and somatic development. In preclinical and clinical studies, direct or indirect inhibition of TF-mediated oncogenic gene expression profiles have proven to be effective in many tumor types, highlighting this group of proteins as valuable therapeutic targets. In spite of this, our understanding of TFs in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is relatively limited. EOC is a heterogeneous disease composed of five major histologic subtypes; high-grade serous, low-grade serous, endometrioid, clear cell and mucinous. Each histology is associated with unique clinical etiologies, sensitivity to therapies, and molecular signatures - including diverse transcriptional regulatory programs. While some TFs are shared across EOC subtypes, a set of TFs are expressed in a histotype-specific manner and likely explain part of the histologic diversity of EOC subtypes. Targeting TFs present with unique opportunities for development of novel precision medicine strategies for ovarian cancer. This article reviews the critical TFs in EOC subtypes and highlights the potential of exploiting TFs as biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Immunohistochemical staining as supportive diagnostic tool for pseudomyxoma peritonei arising from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: A report of two cases and literature review

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) arising from an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (IPMN) is a rare condition. The diagnosis of IPMN as the origin of PMP is mainly inferred from the clinical course and the exclusion of PMP from other organs. The pathological diagnosis has not yet been established. To evaluate the usefulness of immunohistochemical staining for the diagnosis of the primary lesion of PMP as IPMN.

METHODS

There are 2 cases of PMP arising from IPMN between March 2010 and December 2019 at National Center for Global Health and Medicine. A PubMed search that reported PMP arising from IPMN identified 16 additional cases. Diagnostic methods and clinicopathological features of 18 cases were compared.

RESULTS

Four cases including our two cases used immunohistochemical staining for the diagnosis of PMP arising from IPMN. The correspondence of the immunohistochemical staining between PMP and IPMN was shown in the three cases including previously reported two cases and one of our two cases to identify the primary lesion of PMP as IPMN. In addition, we revealed that the comparison of the immunostaining pattern of PMP with the representative immunostaining pattern of the candidate primary lesions is helpful for the diagnosis of the primary lesion of PMP.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunohistochemical staining is helpful to identify the primary lesion of PMP as IPMN.

[Borderline ovarian tumours: CNGOF Guidelines for clinical practice - Biopathology of ovarian borderline tumors]

OBJECTIVES

Ovarian borderline tumors (OBT) represent a heterogeneous group of lesions with specific management for each histological subtype. Thus, the correct histological diagnosis is mandatory.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

References were searched by PubMed from January 2000 to January 2018 and original articles in French and English literature were selected.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

OBT should be classified according to the last WHO classification. Any micro-invasion (foci<5mm) or microcarcinoma (foci<5mm with nuclear atypia and desmoplastic stromal reaction) should be indicated in the pathology report. In case of serous OBT, variants (classical or the micropapillary/cribriform) should be indicated (grade C). The peritoneal implants associated with OBT, should be classified as invasive or noninvasive, according to the extension into the underlying adipous tissue. If no adipous tissue is seen the term undetermined should be used (grade B). In case of mucinous OBT bilateral and/or with peritoneal implants or peritoneal pseudomyxoma a search for primitive gastrointestinal, appendiceal or biliopancreatic tumor should be performed (grade C). In case of OBT, a thorough sampling of the tumor is recommended, with 1 block/cm and 2 blocks/cm in case of mucinous OBT, serous OBT micropapillary variant, OBT with intraepithelial carcinoma or/and micro-invasion. Peritoneal implants should be examined in toto. Omentum without macroscopic lesion should be sampled in 4 to 6 blocks (grade C). In case of ovarian cyst suspicious for OBT, fine needle aspiration is not recommended (grade C). In case of ovarian tumor suspicious for OBT, intraoperative examination should be performed by a gynecological pathologist (grade C).

An Algorithmic Immunohistochemical Approach to Define Tumor Type and Assign Site of Origin

Immunohistochemistry represents an indispensable complement to an epidemiology and morphology-driven approach to tumor diagnosis and site of origin assignment. This review reflects the state of my current practice, based on 15-years' experience in Pathology and a deep-dive into the literature, always striving to be better equipped to answer the age old questions, "What is it, and where is it from?" The tables and figures in this manuscript are the ones I "pull up on the computer" when I am teaching at the microscope and turn to myself when I am (frequently) stuck. This field is so exciting because I firmly believe that, through the application of next-generation immunohistochemistry, we can provide better answers than ever before. Specific topics covered in this review include (1) broad tumor classification and associated screening markers; (2) the role of cancer epidemiology in determining pretest probability; (3) broad-spectrum epithelial markers; (4) noncanonical expression of broad tumor class screening markers; (5) a morphologic pattern-based approach to poorly to undifferentiated malignant neoplasms; (6) a morphologic and immunohistochemical approach to define 4 main carcinoma types; (7) CK7/CK20 coordinate expression; (8) added value of semiquantitative immunohistochemical stain assessment; algorithmic immunohistochemical approaches to (9) "garden variety" adenocarcinomas presenting in the liver, (10) large polygonal cell adenocarcinomas, (11) the distinction of primary surface ovarian epithelial tumors with mucinous features from metastasis, (12) tumors presenting at alternative anatomic sites, (13) squamous cell carcinoma versus urothelial carcinoma, and neuroendocrine neoplasms, including (14) the distinction of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma from well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, site of origin assignment in (15) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor and (16) poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, and (17) the distinction of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor G3 from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma; it concludes with (18) a discussion of diagnostic considerations in the broad-spectrum keratin/CD45/S-100-"triple-negative" neoplasm.

An Update on the Role of Immunohistochemistry in the Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Tract Disorders

As in other organ systems, immunohistochemistry (IHC) serves as an ancillary diagnostic tool for a wide variety of neoplastic and non-neoplastic disorders, including infections, work-up of inflammatory conditions, and subtyping neoplasms of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. In addition, IHC is also used to detect a variety of prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers for carcinomas of the GI tract. The purpose of this review is to highlight the use of IHC in common diagnostic scenarios throughout the tubular GI tract. The clinical indication and guidelines for performing IHC for detecting Helicobacter pylori is discussed along with role of gastrin and neuroendocrine markers in the diagnosis of autoimmune metaplastic atrophic gastritis. The major portion of this review discusses the use of IHC in the diagnostic workup of malignant neoplasms of the GI tract, such as adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma, workup of poorly differentiated malignant neoplasms, and evaluation of uncommon gastric neoplasms (alpha-feto protein-producing carcinomas) and switch/sucrose-nonfermenting complex-deficient carcinomas. Lastly, localization of neuroendocrine tumors of unknown origin to aid clinical management, as well as HPV-driven anal neoplasia and IHC in the workup of basaloid anal neoplasms are also reviewed.

A combination of the immunohistochemical markers CK7 and SATB2 is highly sensitive and specific for distinguishing primary ovarian mucinous tumors from colorectal and appendiceal metastases

Primary ovarian mucinous tumors can be difficult to distinguish from metastatic gastrointestinal neoplasms by histology alone. The expected immunoprofile of a suspected metastatic lower gastrointestinal tumor is CK7-/CK20+/CDX2+/PAX8-. This study assesses the addition of a novel marker SATB2, to improve the diagnostic algorithm. A test cohort included 155 ovarian mucinous tumors (105 carcinomas and 50 borderline tumors) and 230 primary lower gastrointestinal neoplasms (123 colorectal adenocarcinomas and 107 appendiceal neoplasms). All cases were assessed for SATB2, PAX8 CK7, CK20, and CDX2 expression on tissue microarrays. Expression was scored in a 3-tier system as absent, focal (1-50% of tumor cells) and diffuse ( >50% of tumor cells) and then categorized into either absent/present or nondiffuse/diffuse. SATB2 and PAX8 expression was further evaluated in ovarian tumors from an international cohort of 2876 patients (expansion cohort, including 159 mucinous carcinomas and 46 borderline mucinous tumors). The highest accuracy of an individual marker in distinguishing lower gastrointestinal from ovarian mucinous tumors was CK7 (91.7%, nondiffuse/diffuse cut-off) followed by SATB2 (88.8%, present/absent cut-off). The most effective combination was CK7 and SATB2 with accuracy of 95.3% using the 3-tier interpretation, absent/focal/diffuse. This combination outperformed the standard clinical set of CK7, CK20 and CDX2 (87.5%). Re-evaluation of outlier cases confirmed ovarian origin for all but one case. The accuracy of SATB2 was confirmed in the expansion cohort (91.5%). SATB2 expression was also detected in 15% of ovarian endometrioid carcinoma but less than 5% of other ovarian histotypes. A simple two marker combination of CK7 and SATB2 can distinguish lower gastrointestinal from ovarian primary mucinous tumors with greater than 95% accuracy. PAX8 and CDX2 have value as second-line markers. The utility of CK20 in this setting is low and this warrants replacement of this marker with SATB2 in clinical practice.

The utility of PAX8 and SATB2 immunohistochemical stains in distinguishing ovarian mucinous neoplasms from colonic and appendiceal mucinous neoplasm

Objectives

It is challenging to distinguish between primary ovarian mucinous tumors and metastatic mucinous neoplasms from the lower gastrointestinal tract, including appendiceal tumors. A combination of PAX8 and SATB2 immunohistochemical stains can be used as a diagnostic tool to distinguish between these cases.

Results

Immunostaining for SATB2, PAX8, CK7, CK20 and CDX2 was performed on 50 ovarian mucinous neoplasms (OMN) (39 cystadenomas, 4 borderline and 7 adenocarcinomas), 63 mucinous colorectal carcinoma (CRC), and 9 appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMN) [8 low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN) and 1 adenocarcinoma]. PAX8 was positive in 32% of OMN and negative in all CRC and AMN cases. SATB2 was expressed in 2.0% of OMN, 77.8% of AMN, and 49.2% of CRC cases. CK7 was positive in 78.0% of OMN, 33.3% of AMN, and 9.5% of CRC cases. CK20 was expressed in 24.0% of OMN, 88.9% of OMN, and 87.3% of CRC cases. CDX2 was positive in 14.0% of OMN, 100% of AMN, and 90.5% of CRC cases. PAX8 can differentiate between OMN and AMN with high specificity but low sensitivity. CDX2 is the most sensitive marker for CRC and AMN, whereas SATB2 has better specificity.

Poorly differentiated mucinous carcinoma with signet ring cells in an ovarian endometriotic cyst: a case report

Background

Ovarian signet ring cell carcinomas are predominantly metastatic. Cases coexisting with endometriotic cysts are extremely rare, and are supposed to be primary. However, such cases have not been well-documented to date.

Case presentation

A 46-year-old Chinese woman had an incidental small nodule in the right ovarian endometriotic cyst. She underwent a staging surgery due to an unexpected ovarian carcinoma from her frozen section. Laparotomy exploration, MRI and gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed no other abnormalities in the abdominal organs. She had a pelvic recurrence at 7 months and was alive with disease for 13 months at present. Gross examination showed a small mural nodule (l.0 × 0.5 × 0.2 cm) in the wall of the right ovarian cyst (18x15x14 cm). Microscopically, the neoplastic cells arranged in solid nests, crowded small irregular glands and scattered single cells. They had abundant cytoplasmic mucin and contained a significant component of signet ring cells. The stroma was desmoplastic and occasionally contained extracellular mucin deposits. The surrounding endometriotic cyst had several foci of atypical surface epithelium (atypical endometriotic cyst) that was continuous with the mucinous carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated that the tumor cells were diffusely positive for CK7 and negative for CK20 and CDX2.

Conclusions

Primary ovarian poorly differentiated mucinous carcinoma with signet ring cells can occur in an atypical endometriotic cyst. This rare case addresses the necessity of careful and extensive pathological examination on large ovarian endometriotic cysts.

Mucinous Ovarian Tumors

Ovarian mucinous tumors range from benign cystadenomas to borderline tumors to frankly malignant adenocarcinomas, and may display either intestinal-type morphology or, less frequently, endocervical-type differentiation. The latter category has been the subject of recent controversy owing to its morphologic overlap with so-called "seromucinous" ovarian tumors, a group that shares more molecular features with endometrioid tumors than it does with either serous or mucinous ovarian neoplasias. Endocervical-type differentiation in ovarian mucinous tumors may also represent an endocervical metastasis. Distinction of primary ovarian mucinous tumors from gastrointestinal metastases can be difficult, as the morphology of intestinal-type ovarian mucinous primaries sometimes differs only subtly if at all from gastrointestinal metastases.

Pancreaticobiliary metastasis presenting as primary mucinous ovarian neoplasm: A systematic literature review

True primary mucinous ovarian carcinomas are rarer than originally thought and their clinical behavior and treatment response are different than more common epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Secondary ovarian neoplasms often mimic the clinical and histological features of mucinous ovarian cancer making their diagnosis, and therefore treatment, more difficult. Misdiagnosis can have a significant impact on both treatment and prognosis. The majority of these secondary ovarian neoplasms arise from the gastrointestinal tract, with mucinous histology often of pancreaticobiliary origin. Our study objective was to review current evidence distinguishing pancreaticobiliary ovarian metastasis from primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma. We utilized a PubMed search using MeSH terms and selected articles were reviewed, synthesized and summarized. Thirty-nine articles were included in the review. The clinical, gross, histological and immunohistochemical features distinguishing primary mucinous ovarian carcinomas from pancreaticobiliary ovarian metastasis were identified. Compared to primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma, metastatic pancreaticobiliary tumors are more often bilateral, <10 cm, have irregular external surface and surface implants, display an infiltrative pattern of invasion and stain for MUC1 and CK17. Primary ovarian mucinous tumors rarely (<3%) have signet ring cells or involvement of the hilum. Metastatic mucinous tumors mimic their primary mucinous ovarian counterparts and their clinical and histopathological features overlap in many ways. However, these metastatic tumors have features that can help differentiate them from primary mucinous carcinoma. With a high index of suspicion and knowledge of the reviewed features, distinguishing these tumors will continue to become easier.

•

Primary ovarian and metastatic pancreaticobiliary tumors present similarly.

•

Histologic findings can differentiate primary from metastatic ovarian tumors.

•

Bilaterality, size, surface appearance can differentiate primary versus metastatic.

Diagnostic Utility of SATB2 in Metastatic Krukenberg Tumors of the Ovary: An Immunohistochemical Study of 70 Cases With Comparison to CDX2, CK7, CK20, Chromogranin, and Synaptophysin

SATB2 is a sensitive marker for colorectal adenocarcinomas. No study has investigated its diagnostic utility in metastatic Krukenberg tumors (MKTs) of the ovary. Here we performed immunohistochemical staining SATB2 in 70 MKTs of various origins (stomach 27, colorectum 13, appendix 20 including 19 metastatic adenocarcinomas ex goblet cell carcinoids [AdexGCC] and 1 conventional poorly differentiated carcinoma with signet ring cells, breast 5, bladder 3, lung 2) to assess its diagnostic utility. We also compared SATB2 with CDX2, CK7, CK20, chromogranin, and synaptophysin in MKTs of gastric origin (MKTs-stomach), those of colorectal origin (MKTs-colorectum) and those due to appendiceal AdexGCCs (MKT-AdexGCCs) for their sensitivity and specificity to distinguish these tumors. SATB2 staining was seen in 1/27 (4%) MKTs-stomach (40% cells), 7/13 (54%) MKTs-colorectum (mean: 17% cells, median: 7%, range: 2% to 60%), and 19/19 (100%) of MKT-AdexGCCs (mean: 97% cells, median: 100%, range: 80% to 100%) (P<0.01 between any two). SATB2 staining was seen in 1/1 metastatic appendiceal poorly differentiated carcinoma with signet ring cells (5% cells), 1/3 MKTs of bladder origin (60% cells), 0/2 MKTs of pulmonary origin, and 1/5 MKTs of breast origin (10% cells). SATB2 staining was diffuse strong in MKT-AdexGCCs whereas in other MKTs it was focal and weak in the signet ring and nonsignet ring nonglandular cells and from focal weak to diffuse strong in well-formed glands. MKTs-stomach, MKTs-colorectum, and MKT-AdexGCCs showed no significant staining difference in CDX2 (100%, 100%, 100% cases, respectively; P=1.0), CK20 (96%, 100%, 100%, respectively; P=1.0), chromogranin (59%, 31%, 63%, respectively; P>0.05) or synaptophysin (59%, 63%, 84%, respectively; P>0.05) but they had significant difference in CK7 staining (93%, 8%, 42%, respectively; P<0.05). Among these 6 markers, SATB2 is the best one to distinguish MKT-AdexGCCs from MKTs-stomach (100% sensitivity, 96% specificity) and MKTs-colorectum (100% sensitivity and 100% specificity if staining more than 75% tumor cells as the cutoff). In distinguishing MKTs-stomach from MKTs-colorectum, SATB2 is not as good as CK7 which is the best marker. Our results indicate that SATB2 is a highly sensitive marker (100% sensitivity) for metastatic MKT-AdexGCCs with high specificity (100% specificity when showing strong staining in at least 75% cells) among MKTs. SATB2 is a useful marker for determining the primary sites of MKTs of the ovary.

[Biopathology of ovarian carcinomas early and advanced-stages: Article drafted from the French guidelines in oncology entitled "Initial management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer" developed by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY under the aegis of CNGOF and endorsed by INCa]

OBJECTIVES

Ovarian carcinomas represent a heterogeneous group of lesions with specific therapeutic management for each histological subtype. Thus, the correct histological diagnosis is mandatory.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

References were searched by PubMed from January 2000 to January 2018 and original articles in French and English literature were selected.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

In case of ovarian mass suspicious for cancer, a frozen section analysis may be proposed, if it could impact the surgical management. A positive histological diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma (type and grade) has to be rendered on histological (and not cytological) material before any chemotherapy with multiples and large sized biopsies. In case of needle biopsy, at least three fragments with needles>16G are needed. Histological biopsies need to be formalin-fixed (4% formaldehyde) less than 1h after resection and at least 6hours fixation is mandatory for small size biopsies. Tissue transfer to pathological labs up to 48hours under vacuum and at +4°C (in case of large surgical specimens) may be an alternative. Gross examination should include the description of all specimens and their integrity, the site of the tumor and the dimension of all specimens and nodules. Multiples sampling is needed, including the capsule, the solid areas, at least 1 to 2 blocks per cm of tumor for mucinous lesions, the Fallopian tube in toto, at least 3 blocks on grossly normal omentum and one block on the largest omental nodule. WHO classification should be used to classify the carcinoma (type and grade), with the use of a panel of immunohistochemical markers. High-grade ovarian carcinomas (serous and endometrioid) should be tested for BRCA mutation and in case of a detectable tumor mutation, the patient should be referred to an oncogenetic consultation.

A novel algorithm for better distinction of primary mucinous ovarian carcinomas and mucinous carcinomas metastatic to the ovary

Primary mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MOC) are notoriously difficult to distinguish from mucinous carcinomas metastatic to the ovary (mMC). Studies performed on small cohorts reported algorithms based on tumor size and laterality to aid in distinguishing MOC from mMC. We evaluated and improved these by performing a large-scale, nationwide search in the Dutch Pathology Registry. All registered pathology reports fulfilling our search criteria concerning MOC in the Netherlands from 2000 to 2011 were collected. Age, histology, laterality, and size were extracted. An existing database covering the same timeline containing tumors metastatic to the ovary was used, extracting all mMC, age, size, laterality, and primary tumor location. Existing algorithms were applied to our cohort. Subsequently, an algorithm based on tumor histology, laterality, and a nomogram based on age and size was created for differentiating MOC and mMC. We identified 735 MOC and 1018 mMC. Patients with MOC were significantly younger and MOC were significantly larger and more often unilateral than mMC. Signet ring cell carcinomas were rarely primary. Our algorithm used signet ring cell histology, bilaterality, and a nomogram integrating patient age and tumor size to diagnose mMC. Sensitivity and specificity for mMC was 90.1% and 59.0%, respectively. Applying existing algorithms on our cohort yielded a far lower sensitivity. The algorithm described here using tumor histology, laterality, size, and patient age has higher sensitivity but lower specificity compared to earlier algorithms and aids in indicating tumor origin, but for conclusive diagnosis, careful integration of morphology, immunohistochemistry, and clinical and imaging data is recommended.

Prognostic significance of preoperative serum CEA in primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC).

Patients and methods

We reviewed 57 patients with primary MOC, in whom preoperative serum CEA had been measured. All patients were treated at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between June 1996 and September 2016.

Results

Preoperative serum CEA was elevated (>5.0 ng/mL) in 10 patients (17.5%), with a median serum CEA of 9.6 ng/mL (5.4–111.7 ng/mL). CEA was significantly associated with preoperative serum cancer antigen 125 (P=0.002), surgical debulking status (P=0.015), and tumor stage (P=0.001). Univariate analysis showed that patients with elevated CEA had significantly worse overall survival (OS) than patients with normal CEA (5-year OS: 50.8% vs 91.9%, respectively; P=0.013), but there was no significant difference in progression-free survival between the two groups (P=0.307). Multivariate analysis further demonstrated that advanced stage was an independent prognostic predictor for OS (P=0.002, HR: 15.925, 95% CI: 2.745–92.404).

Conclusion

Elevated preoperative serum CEA was strongly correlated with advanced stage in primary MOC, which may indicate a poorer prognosis. Further investigation of the intrinsic relationship between CEA and primary MOC is now required.

Immunohistochemical Characterization Improves the Reproducibility of the Histological Diagnosis of Ovarian Carcinoma

Background: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of gynecologic cancer-related death. Histological assessment remains the standard clue for the diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma. Misinterpretation and inconsistent application of histological criteria may lead to significant interobserver variability and poor reproducibility of the diagnosis. In this study, we investigated the discrepancy in histological diagnosis and the significance of a designed panel of immunohistochemical markers for the improvement of the diagnostic reproducibility of ovarian carcinomas. Methods: We performed a retrospective study on 74 ovarian carcinomas. All tumor slides were independently reviewed by two pathologists. The results for seven available immunomarkers as p53, WT-1, p16INK4A, CK7, CK20, and estrogen and progesterone receptors were determined for all cases by immunohistochemistry. Results: The histological diagnosis review performed using standard histology showed a concordance of diagnoses in 86% of cases with Cohen’s kappa of 0.80. Immunohistochemical results increased significantly the diagnosis reproducibility with a concordance of 91% and a Cohen’s kappa of 0.86 (P = 0.001). Conclusion: Although the histological diagnosis remains reliable, the use of a designed panel of immunohistochemical markers improves significantly the interobserver concordance and the classification accuracy of ovarian carcinomas.

Evaluation of Carcinoma of Unknown Primary on Cytologic Specimens

Carcinoma of unknown primary is defined as metastatic carcinoma without a clinically obvious primary tumor. Determining the tissue of origin in carcinoma of unknown primary is important for site-directed therapy. Immunohistochemistry is the most widely used tool for the work-up of metastases, but molecular profiling assays are also available. This review provides an overview of immunohistochemical stains in the work-up of metastatic carcinoma, with a focus on newer site-specific markers, and discusses the role of gene expression profiling assays for determining tissue of origin. The utility of cytopathology specimens in the evaluation of carcinoma of unknown primary also is highlighted.

Where do these guests come from? A diagnostic approach for metastatic lymph nodes

Objective

In cases presenting with lymphadenopathies (LAP) without a primary focus detected by simple radiological methods, the primary tumor can be diagnosed by a histopathological evaluation of the metastatic lymph nodes. We aimed to discuss the nonhematological malignancies presenting with lymphadenopathies and the histopathological results for primary tumors.

Material and Methods

In this retrospective study, cases diagnosed with metastasis in excisional lymph nodes between January 2013 and June 2016 were assessed for a histopathological diagnostic approach.

Results

Among 632 lymph node biopsies, a total of 21 cases, involving 12 male and 9 female patients with a mean age of 57.23 y (range, 33-92 y), of nonhematological solid tumors were included. The most common localizations of the involved lymph nodes were inguinal (n=8), axillary (n=6), cervical (n=4), and supraclavicular (n=3) region. The most common primary tumors were malignant melanoma (n=6), breast carcinoma (n=4), ovarian carcinoma (n=2), squamous cell carcinoma (n=2), and germ cell tumor (n=2). Others were papillary thyroid carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, prostate adenocarcinoma, and endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Conclusion

Nonhematological malignancies presenting with lymphadenopathies are one of the most complicated cases for clinicians. The histopathological evaluation of the excisional metastatic lymph node biopsies is an important method because of cost effectiveness and easy applicability.

Origins based clinical and molecular complexities of epithelial ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal of all common gynaecological malignancies in women worldwide. Ovarian cancer comprises of >15 distinct tumor types and subtypes characterized by histopathological features, environmental and genetic risk factors, precursor lesions and molecular events during oncogenesis. Recent studies on gene signature profiling of different subtypes of ovarian cancer have revealed significant genetic heterogeneity between and within each ovarian cancer histological subtype. Thus, an immense interest have shown towards a more personalized medicine for understanding the clinical and molecular complexities of four major types of epithelial ovarian cancer (serous, endometrioid, clear cell, and mucinous). As such, further in depth studies are needed for identification of molecular signalling network complexities associated with effective prognostication and targeted therapies to prevent or treat metastasis. Therefore, understanding the metastatic potential of primary ovarian cancer and therapeutic interventions against lethal ovarian cancer for the development of personalized therapies is very much indispensable. Consequently, in this review we have updated the key dysregulated genes of four major subtypes of epithelial carcinomas. We have also highlighted the recent advances and current challenges in unravelling the complexities of the origin of tumor as well as genetic heterogeneity of ovarian cancer.

Massively parallel sequencing analysis of mucinous ovarian carcinomas: genomic profiling and differential diagnoses

OBJECTIVE

Mucinous ovarian cancer (MOC) is a rare type of epithelial ovarian cancer resistant to standard chemotherapy regimens. We sought to characterize the repertoire of somatic mutations in MOCs and to define the contribution of massively parallel sequencing to the classification of tumors diagnosed as primary MOCs.

METHODS

Following gynecologic pathology and chart review, DNA samples obtained from primary MOCs and matched normal tissues/blood were subjected to whole-exome (n = 9) or massively parallel sequencing targeting 341 cancer genes (n = 15). Immunohistochemical analysis of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, PTEN, ARID1A/BAF250a, and the DNA mismatch (MMR) proteins MSH6 and PMS2 was performed for all cases. Mutational frequencies of MOCs were compared to those of high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOCs) and mucinous tumors from other sites.

RESULTS

MOCs were heterogeneous at the genetic level, frequently harboring TP53 (75%) mutations, KRAS (71%) mutations and/or CDKN2A/B homozygous deletions/mutations (33%). Although established criteria for diagnosis were employed, four cases harbored mutational and immunohistochemical profiles similar to those of endometrioid carcinomas, and one case for colorectal or endometrioid carcinoma. Significant differences in the frequencies of KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, FBXW7, PIK3CA and/or APC mutations between the confirmed primary MOCs (n = 19) and HGSOCs, mucinous gastric and/or mucinous colorectal carcinomas were found, whereas no differences in the 341 genes studied between MOCs and mucinous pancreatic carcinomas were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the assessment of mutations affecting TP53, KRAS, PIK3CA, ARID1A and POLE, and DNA MMR protein expression may be used to further aid the diagnosis and treatment decision-making of primary MOC.

Role of tumor microenvironment in ovarian cancer pathobiology

Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common cancer affecting the female population and at present, stands as the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. Poor prognosis and low five-year survival rate are attributed to nonspecific symptoms and below par diagnostic criteria at early phases along with a lack of effective treatment at advanced stages. It is thus of utmost importance to understand ovarian carcinoma through several lenses including its molecular pathogenesis, epidemiology, histological subtypes, hereditary factors, diagnostic approaches and methods of treatment. Above all, it is crucial to dissect the role that the unique peritoneal tumor microenvironment plays in ovarian cancer progression and metastasis. This review seeks to highlight several important aspects of ovarian cancer pathobiology as a means to provide the necessary background to approach ovarian malignancies in the future.

Comprehensive Clinicopathologic and Updated Immunohistochemical Characterization of Primary Ovarian Mucinous Carcinoma

The distinction of primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma (PMOC) from other primaries or secondaries is essential for selecting therapeutic options and prognostication. We aimed to characterize the immunohistochemical profile of 36 PMOCs using an extended immunohistochemical panel, with clinicopathologic features and outcome. PAX8 was negative in 30 (83.3%), and SATB2 was negative in 32/35. HNF1B, AMACR, and napsin-A were detected in 33 (91.7%), 35 (97.2%), and 0 (0%), respectively. MMR proteins and ARID1A were retained in 100%; PTEN was lost in 4 (11.1%). P53 was aberrant in 10 (27.8%); none overexpressed p16. HER2 was positive in 6/35 (17.1%). Most PMOCs had a favorable outcome. However, recurrence is usually fatal. The typical tumor profile was CK7+, CK20+/-, CDX2+/-, PAX8-, ER-, PgR-, and SATB2-. HER2 positivity suggests a possible target for therapy in advanced disease.

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Special AT-rich Sequence-binding Protein 2 (SATB2) Immunohistochemical Staining in Mucinous Tumors From Gastrointestinal and Nongastrointestinal Sites

Special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2) is an accurate marker for conventional colorectal carcinoma (CRC), although its sensitivity and specificity in mucinous tumors from the colon and other sites remains unknown. The objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of SATB2 expression detected by immunohistochemical assay, as a marker of primary CRC in mucinous adenocarcinomas. SATB2 immunohistochemical stains were performed on whole sections from 63 conventional CRCs (controls), 47 mucinous CRCs (mCRC), and 182 noncolorectal mucinous tumors. SATB2 intensity was scored as 1 to 3 based on the estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor grading system, and the percent positive cells was scored in broad categories as follows: 0 (negative)≤5%, 1=5% to 49%, 2≥50%. An optimal sensitivity/specificity pairing (83% and 95%, respectively) was achieved in the mCRCs when the additive intensity and percent score was ≥3 (ie, intensity score+percent score=total score). Defining this total score (histologic score/"H score") as a "positive" result, the sensitivity of SATB2 for conventional CRC was 98% (62/63) versus 83% (39/47) for mCRCs (P=0.02); whereas 5% (9/182) of all noncolorectal mucinous tumors were considered positive. SATB2 especially demonstrated reduced specificity when applied to mucinous gastroesophageal and breast carcinomas, which showed significant expression in 27% and 9% of cases, respectively. In summary, SATB2 is a less sensitive marker of colorectal origin in mCRC compared with conventional CRC and shows significantly reduced specificity in mucinous gastroesophageal and breast primaries.

Mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma

Mucinous tumours involving the ovary may be benign, borderline, or malignant. Malignant tumours may be primary or metastatic. Differentiation between primary and metastatic involvement of the ovary is critical for optimal patient management. Even among skilled pathologists, this distinction can be problematic, as can the distinction between borderline ovarian tumour of intestinal type and well-differentiated invasive primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Primary invasive mucinous ovarian carcinoma and mucinous carcinoma metastatic to the ovary do have distinct patterns of macroscopic and microscopic involvement which will reveal the correct diagnosis in many cases. There are also well-recognized patterns of immunohistochemical staining that can further assist in this differentiation. As a result of the application of these histopathological techniques, the incidence of primary invasive mucinous epithelial carcinoma has fallen over recent years from ∼12% to ∼3%. However, even in recent multicentre clinical trials such as GOG 182, expert pathological review suggests that ∼60% of tumours originally classified as primary invasive mucinous carcinomas were in fact metastatic tumours to the ovary. Review of outcome data for patients with mucinous carcinoma entered into multicentre trials suggests that this subtype of disease has a particularly poor prognosis in comparison with other subtypes of ovarian carcinoma. Historically, patients with mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma (mEOC) have been treated in the same way as other subtypes of ovarian carcinoma. While there is undoubtedly a response rate to platinum-based chemotherapy, retrospective reviews of individual centre experience suggest that this is substantially lower than for high-grade papillary serous carcinoma and in the order of only 30%-40%. The mEOC trial was established to investigate the possibility that the combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (chemotherapy drugs more commonly used in colorectal carcinoma) may be superior to conventional carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy. In a 2 × 2 factorial design, there was also a randomization to bevacizumab. Unfortunately, this trial closed early, 5 years after initiation having recruited just 50 of a proposed 322 patients. mEOC is now characterized as a type I tumour with an identifiable stepwise progression from a premalignant lesion, through non-invasive, to invasive malignancy. Molecular characterization of mEOC reveals it to be distinct from other subtypes of the disease with a KRAS mutation occurring in 40%-50% of patients. Other gene abnormalities including HER2 amplification in ∼19% also occur. This raises the possibility of the use of targeted molecular therapies which with molecular analysis of individual patient tumours could form the basis of a future clinical trial. It is, however, clear that if trials are to be conducted in this rare subtype of disease, they will need to be truly international in nature and carefully designed, possibly using an adaptive stepwise approach and will require an appropriate level of funding with a realistic assessment of likely recruitment. Associated translational research will clearly be essential.

SATB2 is a supportive marker for the differentiation of a primary mucinous tumor of the ovary and an ovarian metastasis of a low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN): A series of seven cases

The differentiation between a primary mucinous ovarian neoplasm and an extra-ovarian metastasis in the ovary is often challenging in the histopathologic practice. Among various ovarian metastases from the gastro-intestinal tract the low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) is an important differential diagnosis to consider particularly in case of pseudomyxoma peritonei. A newly recognized marker in the routine diagnostic of a mucinous neoplasm in the ovary is SATB2 (Special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2). The expression of SATB2 is, within cells of epithelial lineages, mainly restricted to the lower gastro-intestinal tract, indicating colorectal or appendiceal cancer origin. We report seven cases of LAMN, which clinically became apparent due to ovarian metastases in context of pseudomyxoma peritonei or at least small foci of peritoneal tumor spread. An immunohistochemical marker-panel including SATB2, CDX2, CK20, CK7, PAX8, ER and PR revealed a strong expression of SATB2 in all seven cases. On the contrary SATB2-negativity could be demonstrated in the 40 cases of mucinous borderline tumors and primary mucinous carcinomas of the ovary. The histopathologic tentative diagnosis of an ovarian metastasis of LAMN could be confirmed in the findings of the Appendix in six of seven cases. This report supports SATB2 as an additional diagnostic marker for the diagnosis of an ovarian manifestation of LAMN.

Diagnostic immunohistochemistry in gynaecological neoplasia: a brief survey of the most common scenarios

Immunohistochemistry is a valuable adjunct in routine gynaecological pathology. The molecular revolution has redesigned knowledge of gynaecological cancers and refined histological classification. The direct consequence has been the progressive introduction of new immunostainings for diagnostic and classification purposes. Hence, we review the routine diagnostic use of immunohistochemistry in the field of gynaecological neoplasia. We reviewed the immunomarkers useful in gynaecological pathology according to literature revision, our personal experience and research findings. We discuss the application of immunohistochemistry to reach the most accurate diagnosis in morphologically equivocal cases of gynaecological pathology and present the appropriate panel of immunomarkers in the most common scenarios of gynaecological pathology. This short review provides an updated overview of the essential immunohistochemical markers currently used in the diagnostics of gynaecological malignancies along with their molecular rationale.

Co-existence of mucin-producing urothelial-type adenocarcinoma of the prostate and inverted papilloma of the bladder

Adenocarcinoma of prostate with mucinous differentiation arising in the male urethra is extremely rare, with only 21 cases reported in the previous literature. A diagnosis of mucin-producing urothelial carcinoma of the prostate is based on the pathology, immunohistochemistry, and clinical examination by excluding the secondary adenocarcinoma of the prostate. We present a case of unexpected mucinous urothelial carcinoma of prostate with co-existing inverted papilloma of bladder in a 57-year-old man. The patient underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and transurethral resection of a bladder tumour (TUR-Bt), and the pathologic result showed mucinous prostate carcinoma and bladder inverted papilloma. Immunohistological stain was negative for prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate-specific acid phosphatase (PSAP), and P63, but positive for cytokeratin 7 (CK 7), CK 20, clone 34βE12 and P504S. A complete endoscopic examination was performed to exclude the secondary adenocarcinoma of prostate. This case illustrates the clinical and pathological features of a rare and unexpected mucin-producing urothelial carcinoma of prostate in a bladder neoplasm patient.

Dual Immunostain With SATB2 and CK20 Differentiates Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms From Ovarian Mucinous Neoplasms

OBJECTIVES

Determination of the primary site of origin for mucinous neoplasms identified in the peritoneal and/or pelvic cavities may be challenging, with major differential diagnoses including appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (AMN) and ovarian mucinous neoplasm (OMN). Special AT-rich sequence binding protein 2 (SATB2) has been shown to be highly selectively expressed in the lower gastrointestinal tract, including the appendix.

METHODS

We investigated the utility of a dual stain (DS) with SATB2 or caudal type homeobox 2 (CDX2) and cytokeratin 20 (CK20) or villin in distinguishing AMNs from OMNs. Tissue microarrays with 40 AMNs and 18 OMNs were stained with SATB2 or CDX2 paired with either CK20 or villin.

RESULTS

SATB2 single stain showed a good sensitivity of 83% and the highest specificity of 78% for AMNs over OMNs among all four stains. DS with SATB2 and villin showed an identical sensitivity of 78% but specificity increased to 94%, while DS with SATB2 and CK20 showed a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 100%. In contrast, DS with CDX2 and CK20/villin showed slightly higher sensitivity but much lower specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

DS with SATB2/CK20 shows the greatest potential clinical utility in distinguishing AMNs from OMNs and is superior to DS with CDX2/CK20. Importantly, DS could be helpful for specimens with limited tissues.

Molecular Alterations of TP53 are a Defining Feature of Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: A Rereview of Cases Lacking TP53 Mutations in The Cancer Genome Atlas Ovarian Study

The Cancer Genome Atlas has reported that 96% of ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) have TP53 somatic mutations suggesting that mutation of this gene is a defining feature of this neoplasm. In the current study, 5 gynecologic pathologists independently evaluated hematoxylin and eosin slides of 14 available cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas classified as HGSC that lacked a TP53 mutation. The histologic diagnoses rendered by these pathologists and the accompanying molecular genetic data are the subject of this report. Only 1 case (Case 5), which contained a homozygous deletion of TP53, had unanimous interobserver agreement for a diagnosis of pure HGSC. In 1 case (Case 3), all 5 observers (100%) rendered a diagnosis of HGSC; however, 3 observers (60%) noted that the histologic features were not classic for HGSC and suggested this case may have arisen from a low-grade serous carcinoma (arisen from an alternate pathway compared with the usual HGSC). In 2 cases (Cases 4 and 12), only 3 observers (60%) in each case, respectively, interpreted it as having a component of HGSC. In the remaining 10 (71%) of tumors (Cases 1, 2, 6-11, 13, and 14), the consensus diagnosis was not HGSC, with individual diagnoses including low-grade serous carcinoma, high-grade endometrioid carcinoma, HGSC, metastatic carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, atypical proliferative (borderline) serous tumor, and adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified. Therefore, 13 (93%) of the tumors (Cases 1-4 and 6-14) were either not a pure HGSC or represented a diagnosis other than HGSC, all with molecular results not characteristic of HGSC. Accordingly, our review of the TP53 wild-type HGSCs reported in The Cancer Genome Atlas suggests that 100% of de novo HGSCs contain TP53 somatic mutations or deletions, with the exception of the rare HGSCs that develop from a low-grade serous tumor precursor. We, therefore, propose that lack of molecular alterations of TP53 are essentially inconsistent with the diagnosis of ovarian HGSC and that tumors diagnosed as such should be rigorously reassessed to achieve correct classification.