1
|
Goldsmith JD, Troxell ML, Roy-Chowdhuri S, Colasacco CF, Edgerton ME, Fitzgibbons PL, Fulton R, Haas T, Kandalaft PL, Kalicanin T, Lacchetti C, Loykasek P, Thomas NE, Swanson PE, Bellizzi AM. Principles of Analytic Validation of Immunohistochemical Assays: Guideline Update. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2024; 148:e111-e153. [PMID: 38391878 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0483-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— In 2014, the College of American Pathologists developed an evidence-based guideline to address analytic validation of immunohistochemical assays. Fourteen recommendations were offered. Per the National Academy of Medicine standards for developing trustworthy guidelines, guidelines should be updated when new evidence suggests modifications. OBJECTIVE.— To assess evidence published since the release of the original guideline and develop updated evidence-based recommendations. DESIGN.— The College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the literature and update the original guideline recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS.— Two strong recommendations, 1 conditional recommendation, and 12 good practice statements are offered in this updated guideline. They address analytic validation or verification of predictive and nonpredictive assays, and recommended revalidation procedures following changes in assay conditions. CONCLUSIONS.— While many of the original guideline statements remain similar, new recommendations address analytic validation of assays with distinct scoring systems, such as programmed death receptor-1 and analytic verification of US Food and Drug Administration approved/cleared assays; more specific guidance is offered for validating immunohistochemistry performed on cytology specimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey D Goldsmith
- From the Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Goldsmith)
| | - Megan L Troxell
- the Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California (Troxell)
| | - Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri
- the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (Roy-Chowdhuri)
| | - Carol F Colasacco
- the Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center for Evidence-based Guidelines, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Colasacco, Kalicanin, Thomas)
| | - Mary Elizabeth Edgerton
- the Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska (Edgerton)
| | - Patrick L Fitzgibbons
- the Department of Pathology, Providence St Jude Medical Center, Fullerton, California (Fitzgibbons)
| | - Regan Fulton
- Array Science, LLC, Sausalito, California (Fulton)
| | - Thomas Haas
- Seagull Laboratory Consulting, Janesville, Wisconsin (Haas)
| | | | - Tanja Kalicanin
- the Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center for Evidence-based Guidelines, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Colasacco, Kalicanin, Thomas)
| | - Christina Lacchetti
- Policy and Advocacy, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia (Lacchetti)
| | - Patti Loykasek
- Molecular, Immunohistochemistry and Flow Cytometry, Pathology Laboratory Associates, Tulsa, Oklahoma (Loykasek)
| | - Nicole E Thomas
- the Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center for Evidence-based Guidelines, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Colasacco, Kalicanin, Thomas)
| | - Paul E Swanson
- the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington (Swanson)
| | - Andrew M Bellizzi
- the Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (Bellizzi)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hacking SM, Karam J, Singh K, Gamsiz Uzun ED, Brickman A, Yakirevich E, Taliano R, Wang Y. Whole slide image features predict pathologic complete response and poor clinical outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer. Pathol Res Pract 2023; 246:154476. [PMID: 37146413 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast cancers are complex ecosystem like networks of malignant cells and their associated microenvironment. Applications for machine intelligence and the tumoral microenvironment are expanding frontiers in pathology. Previously, computational approaches have been developed to quantify and spatially analyze immune cells, proportionate stroma, and detect tumor budding. Little work has been done to analyze different types of tumor-associated stromata both quantitatively and computationally in relation to clinical endpoints. METHODS We aimed to quantify stromal features from whole slide images (WSI) including stromata (myxoid, collagenous, immune) and tumoral components and combined them with traditional clinical and pathologic parameters in 120 triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) and poor clinical outcomes. RESULTS High collagenous stroma on WSI was best associated with lower rates of pCR, while combined high proportionated stroma (myxoid, collagenous, and immune) most optimally predicted worse clinical survival outcomes. When combining clinical, pathologic, and WSI features, Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) curves for LASSO features was up to 0.67 for pCR and 0.77 for poor outcomes. CONCLUSION The techniques demonstrated in the present study can be performed with appropriate quality assurance. Future trials are needed to demonstrate whether coupling applications for machine intelligence, inclusive of the tumor mesenchyme, can improve outcomes prediction for patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean M Hacking
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital and Lifespan Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Julie Karam
- Center for Computational Molecular Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Kamaljeet Singh
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Ece D Gamsiz Uzun
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital and Lifespan Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States; Center for Computational Molecular Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Arlen Brickman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital and Lifespan Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Evgeny Yakirevich
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital and Lifespan Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Ross Taliano
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital and Lifespan Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Yihong Wang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital and Lifespan Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Witt BL, Zhou W, Ambaye AB, Bellizzi A, Booth CN, Sundling K, Nguyen L, Russell DK, Schinstine M, Staats PN, Thomsen J, Troxell M, Souers RJ, Dvorak J, Lin X, Kurtycz DFI. Using American Type Culture Collection Cell Lines to Evaluate Interlaboratory Variables for Estrogen Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunostaining. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2023; 147:143-148. [PMID: 35639575 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0152-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Most laboratories currently use patient tissues for validating immunohistochemical stains. OBJECTIVE.— To explore advantages of using cell lines with known antigenicity as a validation method. DESIGN.— Five American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) cell lines with known negative, low positive, and moderate to strong estrogen receptor (ER) expression as well as negative, equivocal, and positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression were cultured and made into cell blocks. One block from each cell line was fixed in formalin and another in ethanol before cell block preparation. Two sets of paired unstained slides from each block were sent to 10 different laboratories for HER2 and ER staining to be stained on runs from different days according to each laboratory's defined protocol. RESULTS.— The 10 study participants evaluated 40 slides in a blinded fashion. For ER expression, all 80 interpretations for the ER strong and moderate positive cell lines had the target ER-positive result, and 74 of 80 ER-negative cell lines (92.5%) had agreement with the intended negative result. The ER low positive cell line showed varied but positive expression among all observers. The HER2 (3+)-positive cell lines yielded a target interpretation of 3+ in 65 of 80 interpretations (81.2%). For the HER2-negative cell line 69 of 78 interpretations (88.5%) were consistent with the target response (0 or 1+). No significant variation was observed between the ethanol- and non-ethanol-exposed cell lines, or between runs by the same laboratory. Variation from target results clustered within laboratories. CONCLUSIONS.— This study indicates that variability between laboratories can be identified by using cell lines for quantitative or semiquantitative immunohistochemistry when using cultured cell lines of known antigenicity. These cell lines could potentially play a role in aiding anatomic pathology laboratories in validating immunohistochemistry tests for formalin- and ethanol-fixed tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin L Witt
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (Witt).,From the Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, ARUP, Salt Lake City, Utah (Witt, Zhou)
| | - Wenhua Zhou
- From the Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, ARUP, Salt Lake City, Utah (Witt, Zhou)
| | - Abiy B Ambaye
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington (Ambaye, Schinstine)
| | - Andrew Bellizzi
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Bellizzi)
| | - Christine N Booth
- From the Department of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (Booth)
| | - Kaitlin Sundling
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison (Sundling, Kurtycz)
| | - Lananh Nguyen
- From the Department of Pathology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire (Nguyen)
| | - Donna K Russell
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York (Russell)
| | - Malcolm Schinstine
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington (Ambaye, Schinstine)
| | - Paul N Staats
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Maryland, Baltimore (Staats)
| | - Jean Thomsen
- From the Department of Pathology, Methodist Jennie Edmundson Hospital, Council Bluffs, Iowa (Thomsen)
| | - Megan Troxell
- From the Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California (Troxell)
| | - Rhona J Souers
- From the Department of Biostatistics (Souers), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois
| | - James Dvorak
- From the Department of Proficiency Testing (Dvorak), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois
| | - Xiaoqi Lin
- From the Department of Pathology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (Lin)
| | - Daniel F I Kurtycz
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison (Sundling, Kurtycz)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Scherrer E, Kang A, Bloudek LM, Koshkin VS. HER2 expression in urothelial carcinoma, a systematic literature review. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1011885. [PMID: 36338710 PMCID: PMC9635895 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1011885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a common malignancy with significant associated mortality. Recent clinical trials suggest an emerging role for HER2-targeted therapy. Testing for HER2 expression in UC is not part of current routine clinical practice. In consequence, the prevalence of HER2 expression in UC is not well defined. Methods A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to characterize HER2 expression in both locally advanced unresectable or metastatic (LA/mUC) and earlier stage UC, classified as HER2+, HER2-low, HER2-. HER2+ was defined as an immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 3+ or IHC 2+ and ISH/FISH+. HER2-low was defined as an IHC score of 2+ and ISH/FISH- or IHC 1+. HER2- was defined as an IHC score of 0. Weighted averages were calculated to generate an estimate of the population prevalence. Results A total of 88 studies were identified, with 45, 30, and 13 studies investigating LA/mUC, earlier stage UC, and mixed stage/unspecified, respectively. The most common assays used were Dako HercepTest and Ventana Pathway anti-HER2/neu (4B5) for IHC to assess HER2 protein expression; Abbott PathVysion HER-2 DNA Probe Kit, FoundationOne CDx, and Guardant360 CDx for assessing HER2 gene amplification. The most frequently cited scoring guidelines were ASCO/CAP guidelines for breast cancer and gastric cancer, though most studies defined their own criteria for HER2 expression. Using the pre-specified definition, HER2+ prevalence ranged from 6.7% to 37.5% with a weighted average of 13.0% in LA/mUC. Only 1 study presented data that could be classified as HER2+ based on pre-specified criteria in earlier stage UC patients, and this study represented a likely outlier, at 76.0%. Conclusion The results from this SLR help to shed light on HER2 expression in UC, a potentially clinically relevant biomarker-driven subpopulation for emerging HER2-directed regimens. Results of this SLR illuminate the variability in how HER2+ status expression levels are being assessed and how HER2+ is defined. Consensus on standardized HER2 testing and scoring criteria is paramount to better understand the clinical relevance in patients with UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Vadim S. Koshkin
- Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- *Correspondence: Vadim S. Koshkin,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shah AN, Sunderraj A, Finkelman B, See SH, Davis AA, Gerratana L, Wehbe F, Katam N, Mahalingam D, Gradishar WJ, Behdad A, Blanco L, Cristofanilli M. Positive predictive value of ERBB2 copy number gain by tissue or circulating tumor DNA next-generation sequencing across advanced cancers. Oncotarget 2022; 13:273-280. [PMID: 35126865 PMCID: PMC8809397 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.28188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The correlation of ERBB2 copy number gain (CNG) from tissue or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) by next-generation sequencing (NGS) with standard HER2 tissue evaluation is not well understood. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively identified patients with ERBB2 CNG on commercial NGS. We described their clinical-pathologic features and calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) of ERBB2 CNG by NGS for HER2-positivity by IHC and FISH testing. RESULTS 176 patients had NGS revealing an ERBB2 CNG (112 by tumor tissue and 91 by ctDNA). The cancer subtypes with the most cases with ERBB2 CNG by NGS were breast (n = 67), non-small cell lung (n = 25), colorectal (n = 18), gastroesophageal (n = 17), pancreatic (n = 11), and uterine (n = 11). The PPV of ERBB2 CNG in determining HER2 positivity by standard IHC/FISH definitions was 88% for tissue NGS (n = 57) and 80% for ctDNA (n = 47). The PPV among breast cancer patients for tissue NGS was 97% (n = 35) and ctDNA was 93% (n = 39). However, for non-breast cancer cases, the PPV of ERBB2 amplification by tissue NGS dropped to 76% (n = 22) and by ctDNA to 44% (n = 7). CONCLUSIONS ERBB2 CNG by NGS is detected in numerous malignancies for which HER2 testing is not standard. Detection of ERBB2 CNG by tissue NGS and ctDNA has a high PPV for true HER2-positivity by standard IHC and/or FISH testing in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ami N. Shah
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ashwin Sunderraj
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Brian Finkelman
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sharlene H. See
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Andrew A. Davis
- Siteman Cancer Center of Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Lorenzo Gerratana
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO), IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Firas Wehbe
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Neelima Katam
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Deva Mahalingam
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - William J. Gradishar
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Amir Behdad
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Luis Blanco
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Massimo Cristofanilli
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Polónia A, Caramelo A. HER2 in situ hybridization test in breast cancer: quantifying margins of error and genetic heterogeneity. Mod Pathol 2021; 34:1478-1486. [PMID: 33980971 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00813-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of counting increasing number of invasive cancer cells in the result of the HER2 in situ hybridization (ISH) test in breast cancer as well as to compare two different approaches of measuring genomic heterogeneity (single cell and population based). A cohort of 100 consecutive breast cancer cases (primary and metastatic) were evaluated for HER2 gene amplification with bright-field ISH. The evaluation of the samples included scoring 20 nuclei, in five different areas, measuring the margins of error for each case. Genomic heterogeneity (GH) was defined by the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline as a discrete population of tumor cells with HER2 amplification. We also evaluated GH as single tumor cells with HER2 amplification. The stabilization of the coefficient of variation of HER2/CEP17 ratio requires about 60 invasive cancer cells. The average margin of error of HER2/CEP17 ratio and of HER2 copy number was 0.40 and 0.53, respectively, when counting 20 cells, decreasing to 0.20 and 0.26 when counting 100 cells. Population GH was observed in 1% of the cases, while single cell GH was observed in 27% of the cases, reaching its maximum value in cases near the thresholds of positivity. Therefore, margins of error in HER2 ISH test are high, and the minimal cell number recommended in current guidelines should be raised to at least 60 cells. Population GH is a rare event and single cell GH is maximal in cases near the thresholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- António Polónia
- Department of Pathology, Ipatimup Diagnostics, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. .,I3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Ana Caramelo
- Department of Pathology, Ipatimup Diagnostics, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,I3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Do M, Kim H, Yeo I, Lee J, Park IA, Ryu HS, Kim Y. Clinical Application of Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Mass Spectrometry to Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Measurements as a Potential Diagnostic Tool for Breast Cancer Therapy. Clin Chem 2020; 66:1339-1348. [DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is often overexpressed in breast cancer and correlates with a worse prognosis. Thus, the accurate detection of HER2 is crucial for providing the appropriate measures for patients. However, the current techniques used to detect HER2 status, immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), have limitations. Specifically, FISH, which is mandatory for arbitrating 2+ cases, is time-consuming and costly. To address this shortcoming, we established a multiple reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry (MRM-MS) assay that improves on existing methods for differentiating HER2 status.
Methods
We quantified HER2 expression levels in 210 breast cancer formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples by MRM-MS. We aimed to improve the accuracy and precision of HER2 quantification by simplifying the sample preparation through predicting the number of FFPE slides required to ensure an adequate amount of protein and using the expression levels of an epithelial cell-specific protein as a normalization factor when measuring HER2 expression levels.
Results
To assess the correlation between MRM-MS and IHC/FISH data, HER2 quantitative data from MRM-MS were divided by the expression levels of junctional adhesion molecule A, an epithelial cell-specific protein, prior to statistical analysis. The normalized HER2 amounts distinguished between HER2 2+/FISH-negative and 2+/FISH-positive groups (AUROC = 0.908), which could not be differentiated by IHC. In addition, all HER2 status were discriminated by MRM-MS.
Conclusions
This MRM-MS assay yields more accurate HER2 expression levels relative to immunohistochemistry and should help to guide clinicians toward the proper treatment for breast cancer patients, based on their HER2 expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misol Do
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyunsoo Kim
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Injoon Yeo
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jihyeon Lee
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - In Ae Park
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Han Suk Ryu
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Youngsoo Kim
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
An amplification strategy for detecting HER2 with a quasi-targeted proteomics approach coupled with aptamer-triggered hybridization chain reaction. Talanta 2020; 215:120918. [PMID: 32312461 DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.120918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive is a particularly aggressive type of the breast cancer. Because of the evidence has revealed that accurate HER2 status detection is crucial for prognosis and treatment strategy selection, great effort has been taken to develop assays for sensitive and accurate quantification of HER2. However, nonspecific amplification effect of most current assays limits the quantification accuracy of low abundance HER2. In the present work, we developed an LC-MS/MS-based quasi-targeted proteomics strategy coupled with hybridization chain reaction (HCR) for amplification of the HER2 protein signal. In the described strategy, the aptamer triggered the HCR system to undergo a cascade of hybridization events, with the two locked hairpins conjugated to the substrate peptide to form aptamer-HCR peptide probes. The membrane protein HER2 was recognized by probe and the signal was to be converted and then amplified into the mass response of the reporter peptide, which could be quantified using LC-MS/MS. The signal intensity was approximately five fold greater than that without signal amplification. Finally, the developed assay was applied for the quantitative analysis of HER2 in breast cell lines and monitor the dynamic change of HER2 in drug induced HER2 negative cells. The result demonstrated that combination of HCR signal amplification and mass spectrometry provides a novel approach for simple, accurate, and quantitative monitoring of low abundance protein.
Collapse
|
9
|
Curado M, Caramelo AS, Eloy C, Polónia A. What to expect from the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 guideline in the reflex in situ hybridization test of immunohistochemically equivocal 2+ cases? Virchows Arch 2019; 475:303-311. [PMID: 30953146 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-019-02567-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2019] [Revised: 03/22/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
To evaluate the effect of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline in the identification of HER2-positive breast carcinomas (BC) in reflex in situ hybridization (ISH) test. A total of 592 primary invasive BC cases from before and after the publication of the updated ASCO/CAP guideline were evaluated for HER2 amplification by silver ISH according to the 2013 and 2018 guidelines. Cases were mostly (95%) HER2 equivocal by immunohistochemistry (IHC), not centrally reviewed. Other reasons for referring cases were IHC confirmation, IHC discordancy (either between needle-core-biopsy (NCB) and surgical excision specimen (SES) or between different laboratories) and IHC result unexpected for histopathologic features. Cases evaluated with the 2013 guideline (1st cohort) were 14.6% HER2-positive, decreasing significantly after the reclassification with the 2018 guideline due to the exclusion of group 2 cases without HER2 protein overexpression. Cases studied after the implementation of the 2018 guideline (2nd cohort) were 8.7% HER2-positive, a frequency that was not significantly different from the reclassification of the 1st cohort with the 2018 guideline. All cases referred for IHC confirmation had the expected ISH result. Cases with IHC discordancy between NCB and SES were ISH concordant. Only one out of 14 cases with an IHC score 3+ and classified as histological grade 1 or with a Ki67 below 10% was classified as ISH HER2-positive. The 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline resulted in a decrease of HER2-positive cases in reflex ISH test, selecting less patients for anti-HER2-targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mónica Curado
- Department of Pathology, Ipatimup Diagnostics, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto, Rua Júlio Amaral de Carvalho, 45, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal.,I3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Rua Júlio Amaral de Carvalho, 45, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana Sofia Caramelo
- Department of Pathology, Ipatimup Diagnostics, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto, Rua Júlio Amaral de Carvalho, 45, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal.,I3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Rua Júlio Amaral de Carvalho, 45, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal
| | - Catarina Eloy
- Department of Pathology, Ipatimup Diagnostics, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto, Rua Júlio Amaral de Carvalho, 45, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal.,I3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Rua Júlio Amaral de Carvalho, 45, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Al. Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| | - António Polónia
- Department of Pathology, Ipatimup Diagnostics, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto, Rua Júlio Amaral de Carvalho, 45, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal. .,I3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Rua Júlio Amaral de Carvalho, 45, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hormone- and HER2-receptor assessment in 33,046 breast cancer patients: a nationwide comparison of positivity rates between pathology laboratories in the Netherlands. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 175:487-497. [PMID: 30825048 PMCID: PMC6533417 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05180-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Patient management of invasive breast cancer (IBC) is to a large extent based on hormone- and HER2-receptor assessment. High-quality, reliable receptor assessment is of key importance as false results may lead to under- or overtreatment of patients. Surveillance of case-mix adjusted positivity rates has been suggested as a tool to identify laboratories with insufficient testing assays, as this covers the whole process of receptor assessment and enables laboratories to benchmark their positivity rates against other laboratories. We studied laboratory-specific variation in hormone- and HER2 positivity rates of 33,046 breast cancer patients using real-life nationwide data. Methods All synoptic pathology reports of IBC resection-specimens, obtained between 2013 and 2016, were retrieved from the nationwide Dutch pathology registry (PALGA). Absolute and case-mix adjusted receptor positivity rates were compared to the mean national proportion and presented in funnel plots in separate analyses for estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and HER2. Case-mix adjustment was performed by multivariable logistic regression. Results 33,794 IBC lesions from 33,046 patients of 39 pathology laboratories were included. After case-mix adjustment, mean positivity rates were 87.2% for ER (range 80.4–94.3), 71.3% for PR (62.5–77.5%), and 9.9% for HER2 (5.5–12.7%). Overall, 14 (35.9%), 17 (43.6%) and 11 (28.2%) laboratories showed positivity rates outside the 95% confidence interval for ER, PR and HER2, respectively. Conclusion This nationwide study shows that absolute variation in hormone- and HER2-receptor positivity rates between Dutch pathology laboratories is limited. Yet, the considerable number of outlying laboratories shows that there is still need for improvement. Continuous monitoring and benchmarking of positivity rates may help to realize this.
Collapse
|
11
|
Bogen SA. A Root Cause Analysis Into the High Error Rate in Clinical Immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2019; 27:329-338. [PMID: 30807309 PMCID: PMC6706333 DOI: 10.1097/pai.0000000000000750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The field of Clinical Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is beset with a high error rate, an order of magnitude higher than in other types of clinical laboratory testing. Despite the many improvements in the field, these errors have persisted over the last 2 decades. The improvements over the years include an extensive literature describing the potential causes of errors and how to avoid them. More stringent regulatory guidelines have also been implemented. These measures reflect the standard view is that fixing the broad confluence of causes of error will address the problem. This review takes a different tack. To understand the high error rates, this review compares Clinical IHC laboratory practice to practices of other clinical laboratory disciplines. What aspects of laboratory testing that minimize errors in other clinical laboratory disciplines are not found in Clinical IHC? In this review, we seek to identify causal factors and underlying root causes that are unique to the field of Clinical IHC in comparison to other laboratory testing disciplines. The most important underlying root cause is the absence of traceable units of measure, international standards, calibrators that are traceable to standards, and quantitative monitoring of controls. These tools and practices (in other clinical laboratory disciplines) provide regular accurate feedback to laboratory personnel on analytic test performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven A Bogen
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Tufts Medical Center and MDP LLC, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tuzlali S, Yavuz E. Prognostic and Predictive Factors. Breast Cancer 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-96947-3_6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
13
|
Canda T, Yavuz E, Özdemir N, İlvan S, Dizbay SS, Durak MG, Tuzlalı S, Zekioğlu O, Demir A, Onur H, Üstündağ K, Göktaş B. Immunohistochemical HER2 Status Evaluation in Breast Cancer Pathology Samples: A Multicenter, Parallel-Design Concordance Study. Eur J Breast Health 2018; 14:160-165. [PMID: 30123882 DOI: 10.5152/ejbh.2018.3961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2018] [Accepted: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective As patients with increased human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) overexpression are more likely to benefit from trastuzumab treatment, the accuracy of HER2 receptor status in breast cancer patients is significant for appropriate disease management. However, this assessment is not harmonized and results may be highly variable between centers. The aim of this study was to investigate the degree of interlaboratory variability in the results of HER2 expression reported by 5 participating centers and to assess the concordance between these centers and a reference laboratory.Materials and Methods: A total of 30 breast cancer samples were tested and scored for HER2 expression using immunohistochemical method in 5 centers from Turkey and in a reference laboratory from Netherlands (Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam). All the participating centers had an experience of more than 10 years regarding the HER2 testing. The results were compared both among the centers and with the reference laboratory. Results When the concordance of participating centers and the reference laboratory was evaluated regarding negative (0-1+), equivocal 2(+) and positive 3(+) classification of HER2 immunostaining, the highest concordance was found in Center-A, and the lowest in Center-C (Kendall's tau-b concordance coefficient 0.911 and 0.724, respectively). The concordance of the centers with reference laboratory was 80.0% both in equivocal and positive samples, while it increased up to 91.8% in negative samples. Conclusions This study showed that in general there is sufficiently good agreement between the reference laboratory and the participating centers for immunohistochemical HER2 assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tülay Canda
- Department of Pathology, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Ekrem Yavuz
- Department of Pathology, İstanbul University, İstanbul School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Necmettin Özdemir
- Department of Pathology, Ege University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Sennur İlvan
- Department of Pathology, İstanbul University, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Serpil Sak Dizbay
- Department of Pathology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Merih Güray Durak
- Department of Pathology, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Sıtkı Tuzlalı
- Department of Pathology, İstanbul University, İstanbul School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Osman Zekioğlu
- Department of Pathology, Ege University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Atakan Demir
- Department of Pathology, İstanbul University, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Handan Onur
- Department of Pathology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Kasım Üstündağ
- Clinical Research, Roche Preparations San. Inc., İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Burçe Göktaş
- Clinical Research, Roche Preparations San. Inc., İstanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bogdanovska-Todorovska M, Petrushevska G, Janevska V, Spasevska L, Kostadinova-Kunovska S. Standardization and optimization of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER-2 assessment in breast cancer: A single center experience. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2018; 18:132-140. [PMID: 29389309 DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2018.2519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2017] [Revised: 11/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Accurate assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) is crucial in selecting patients for targeted therapy. Commonly used methods for HER-2 testing are immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Here we presented the implementation, optimization and standardization of two FISH protocols using breast cancer samples and assessed the impact of pre-analytical and analytical factors on HER-2 testing. Formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue samples from 70 breast cancer patients were tested for HER-2 using PathVysion™ HER-2 DNA Probe Kit and two different paraffin pretreatment kits, Vysis/Abbott Paraffin Pretreatment Reagent Kit (40 samples) and DAKO Histology FISH Accessory Kit (30 samples). The concordance between FISH and IHC results was determined. Pre-analytical and analytical factors (i.e., fixation, baking, digestion, and post-hybridization washing) affected the efficiency and quality of hybridization. The overall hybridization success in our study was 98.6% (69/70); the failure rate was 1.4%. The DAKO pretreatment kit was more time-efficient and resulted in more uniform signals that were easier to interpret, compared to the Vysis/Abbott kit. The overall concordance between IHC and FISH was 84.06%, kappa coefficient 0.5976 (p < 0.0001). The greatest discordance (82%) between IHC and FISH was observed in IHC 2+ group. A standardized FISH protocol for HER-2 assessment, with high hybridization efficiency, is necessary due to variability in tissue processing and individual tissue characteristics. Differences in the pre-analytical and analytical steps can affect the hybridization quality and efficiency. The use of DAKO pretreatment kit is time-saving and cost-effective.
Collapse
|
15
|
Iwashita T, Nakai Y, Mukai T, Togawa O, Matsubara S, Hatano Y, Hara A, Tanaka M, Shibahara J, Fukayama M, Isayama H, Yasuda I. A 19-Gauge Histology Needle Versus a 19-Gauge Standard Needle in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Lesions: A Multicenter Randomized Comparison Study (GREATER Study). Dig Dis Sci 2018; 63:1043-1051. [PMID: 29464585 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-4913-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 01/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The necessity of histological analysis is increasing. A 19-gauge histology needle (PC19) in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has recently been developed and has shown high yields of tissue acquisition and histological diagnosis. AIMS To compare the histological diagnostic yield in single-pass EUS-FNA for solid lesions using PC19 and a standard 19-gauge needle (EC19). PATIENTS AND METHODS Consecutive patients with solid lesions were enrolled and underwent one pass with each of PC19 and EC19 for EUS-FNA with the randomized order of the needles. The primary endpoint was the histological diagnostic accuracy. The secondary endpoints were the feasibility, yield of histological core, cytological and overall diagnostic accuracies, and adverse events. Subgroup analysis was performed for the optimal situation with PC19. RESULTS Of the 115 patients, 110 underwent EUS-FNA and five were excluded. EUS-FNA was performed from the esophagus in four, stomach in 80, or duodenum in 26. The final diagnosis was malignancy in 100 and benign in 10. The feasibility was 98.2 and 97.3% with PC19 and EC19, respectively (p = 1.00). The rate of presence of a histological core and the histological, cytological, and overall diagnostic accuracies for PC19 versus EC19 were 84.6 versus 80.9% (p = 0.593), 83.6 versus 73.6% (p = 0.099), 63.6 versus 56.4% (p = 0.335), and 90.0 versus 79.1% (p = 0.039), respectively. PC19 was favored in the trans-esophageal/gastric approaches to obtain a histological diagnosis (p = 0.013). Adverse events were observed in four patients. CONCLUSION Single-pass EUS-FNA with PC19 was feasible and showed significantly higher overall diagnostic accuracy and an increased tendency towards histological diagnostic accuracy, especially with trans-esophageal/gastric FNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuji Iwashita
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan.
| | - Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Mukai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Osamu Togawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanto Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Saburo Matsubara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Police Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Hatano
- Department of Tumor Pathology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Akira Hara
- Department of Tumor Pathology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Mariko Tanaka
- Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junji Shibahara
- Department of Pathology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masashi Fukayama
- Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Isayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Yasuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Teikyo University Mizonokuchi Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bogdanovska-Todorovska M, Kostadinova-Kunovska S, Jovanovik R, Krsteska B, Kondov G, Kondov B, Petrushevska G. Correlation of Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization for HER-2 Assessment in Breast Cancer Patients: Single Centre Experience. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2018; 6:593-599. [PMID: 29731922 PMCID: PMC5927485 DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Revised: 03/06/2018] [Accepted: 03/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of HER-2 is imperative in selecting patients for targeted therapy. Most commonly used test methods for HER-2 are immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). We evaluated the concordance between FISH and IHC for HER-2 in breast cancer samples using Food and Drug Administration approved tests. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Archived paraffin tissue blocks from 73 breast cancer patients were used. HER-2 immunostaining was performed using Ventana anti–HER-2 monoclonal antibody. The FISH assay was performed using PathVysion™ HER-2 DNA Probe Kit. RESULTS: Of the 73 cases 68.5% were IHC 0/1+, 15.07% were IHC 2+ and 16.44% were IHC 3+. Successful hybridisation was achieved in 72 cases. HER-2 FISH amplification was determined in 16.67% cases. Ten IHC 3+ and two IHC 2+ cases were FISH positive. Two of the IHC 3+ cases were FISH negative. Concordance rate was 100%, 18.18% and 83.33% for IHC 0/1+, 2+ and 3+ group, respectively. Total concordance was 84.72%, kappa 0.598 (p < 0.0001). The sensitivity of IHC in detecting IHC 2+ and IHC 3+ cases was 16.7% and 83.3%, and the specificity was 85% and 96.67%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The consistency between the methods was highest for IHC negative and lowest for IHC equivocal cases. The immunohistochemistry showed high sensitivity for IHC 2+/3+ cases and high specificity for IHC 3+ cases. Our results support the view that false-positive rather than false-negative IHC results are a problem with HER-2/IHC testing, and that IHC should be used as an initial screening test, but IHC 2+/ 3+ results should be confirmed by FISH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Slavica Kostadinova-Kunovska
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
| | - Rubens Jovanovik
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
| | - Blagica Krsteska
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
| | - Goran Kondov
- University Clinic for Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Clinical Centre "Mother Theresa", Faculty of Medicine, Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
| | - Borislav Kondov
- University Clinic for Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Clinical Centre "Mother Theresa", Faculty of Medicine, Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
| | - Gordana Petrushevska
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhou W, Xu F, Li D, Chen Y. Improved Detection of HER2 by a Quasi-Targeted Proteomics Approach Using Aptamer–Peptide Probe and Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Clin Chem 2018; 64:526-535. [DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.274266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer is a particularly aggressive type of the disease. To date, much evidence has indicated that accurate HER2 status detection is crucial for prognosis and treatment strategy selection. Thus, bioanalytical techniques for early and accurate detection of HER2 have the potential to improve patient care. Currently, the widely used immunohistochemical staining normally has problems with reproducibility and lack of standardization, resulting in poor concordance between laboratories. Aptamers are a good alternative, but the extent of their use in quantitative analysis of HER2 is limited because of the lack of effective detection methods.
METHODS
We developed a quasi-targeted proteomics assay and converted the HER2 signal into the mass response of reporter peptide by a combination of aptamer–peptide probe and LC-MS/MS.
RESULTS
The selected aptamer–peptide probe consisted of aptamer HB5 and the substrate peptide GDKAVLGVDPFR that contained the reporter peptide AVLGVDPFR. After characterization of this newly synthesized probe (e.g., conjugation efficiency, stability, binding affinity, specificity, and digestion efficiency), probe binding and trypsin shaving conditions were optimized. The resulting limit of quantification for HER2 was 25 pmol/L. Then, the quasi-targeted proteomics assay was applied to determine the HER2 concentrations in the HER2-positive breast cancer cells BT474 and SK-BR-3, the HER2-negative breast cancer cells MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7, and 36 pairs of human breast primary tumors and adjacent normal tissue samples. The results were highly concordant with those obtained by immunohistochemistry with reflex testing by fluorescent in situ hybridization.
CONCLUSIONS
Quasi-targeted proteomics can be a quantitative alternative for HER2 detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weixian Zhou
- School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Feifei Xu
- School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Danni Li
- Department of Lab Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Yun Chen
- School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rost S, Giltnane J, Bordeaux JM, Hitzman C, Koeppen H, Liu SD. Multiplexed ion beam imaging analysis for quantitation of protein expression in cancer tissue sections. J Transl Med 2017; 97:992-1003. [PMID: 28553935 DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2017.50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2017] [Revised: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 03/31/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Part of developing therapeutics is the need to identify patients who will respond to treatment. For HER2-targeted therapies, such as trastuzumab, the expression level of HER2 is used to identify patients likely to receive benefit from therapy. Currently, chromogenic immunohistochemistry on patient tumor tissue is one of the methodologies used to assess the expression level of HER2 to determine eligibility for trastuzumab. However, chromogenic staining is fraught with serious drawbacks that influence scoring, which is additionally flawed due to the subjective nature of human/pathologist bias. Thus, to advance drug development and precision medicine, there is a need to develop technologies that are more objective and quantitative through the collection and integration of larger data sets. In proof of concept experiments, we show multiplexed ion beam imaging (MIBI), a novel imaging technology, can quantitate HER2 expression on breast carcinoma tissue with known HER2 status and those values correlate with pathologist-determined IHC scores. The same type of quantitative analysis using the mean pixel value of five individual cells and total pixel count of the entire image was extended to a blinded study of breast carcinoma samples of unknown HER2 scores. Here, a strong correlation between quantitation of HER2 by MIBI analysis and pathologist-derived HER2 IHC score was identified. In addition, a comparison between MIBI analysis and immunofluorescence-based automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) technology, an industry-accepted quantitation system, showed strong correlation in the same blind study. Further comparison of the two systems determined MIBI was comparable to AQUA analysis when evaluated against pathologist-determined scores. Using HER2 as a model, these data show MIBI analysis can quantitate protein expression with greater sensitivity and objectivity compared to standard pathologist interpretation, demonstrating its potential as a technology capable of advancing cancer and patient diagnostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Rost
- Department of Pathology, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Chuck Hitzman
- Stanford Nano Shared Facility, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Hartmut Koeppen
- Department of Pathology, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Scot D Liu
- Department of Pathology, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Paulik R, Micsik T, Kiszler G, Kaszál P, Székely J, Paulik N, Várhalmi E, Prémusz V, Krenács T, Molnár B. An optimized image analysis algorithm for detecting nuclear signals in digital whole slides for histopathology. Cytometry A 2017; 91:595-608. [DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2016] [Revised: 03/08/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tamás Micsik
- 1st Department of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research; Semmelweis University; Budapest Hungary
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tibor Krenács
- 1st Department of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research; Semmelweis University; Budapest Hungary
| | - Béla Molnár
- Clinical Gastroenterology Research Unit; Hungarian Academy of Sciences; Budapest Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Polónia A, Eloy C, Pinto J, Braga AC, Oliveira G, Schmitt F. Counting invasive breast cancer cells in the HER2 silver in-situ hybridization test: how many cells are enough? Histopathology 2017; 71:247-257. [PMID: 28267250 DOI: 10.1111/his.13208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2016] [Accepted: 03/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of the HER2 in-situ hybridization (ISH) test in breast cancer by measuring the impact of counting different numbers of invasive cancer cells. METHODS AND RESULTS A cohort of 101 primary invasive breast cancer cases were evaluated for HER2 gene amplification by silver ISH, and the concordance among four observers with different levels of experience, counting different numbers of invasive cancer cells, was determined. The evaluation of the samples included scoring 20 nuclei, in three different areas. The cases were scored twice, with a washout interval of at least 2 weeks. We observed an increase in the intraobserver concordance rate between the first and second evaluations with an increase in cell count. A count of 60 invasive cells was needed to obtain a concordance rate near 95% and an agreement rate greater than 0.80 by all observers. The interobserver concordance rate of the HER2 test also increased with the increase in cell count, reaching at least a 90% concordance rate with a count of 60 invasive cells. The median variability of both the HER2/CEP17 ratio and the average HER2 copy number between different evaluations decreased with the increase in cell count, being statistically higher in HER2-positive cases. CONCLUSIONS The minimal cell number recommended in current guidelines should be raised to at least 40, and preferably 60, invasive cells. Moreover, cases with amplification levels close to the threshold should be subjected to a dual count from an experienced observer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- António Polónia
- Department of Pathology, Ipatimup Diagnostics, Ipatimup, Porto, Portugal.,FMUP, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Catarina Eloy
- Department of Pathology, Ipatimup Diagnostics, Ipatimup, Porto, Portugal.,FMUP, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - João Pinto
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Pedro Hispano, ULS Matosinhos, Matosinhos, Portugal
| | - Ana Costa Braga
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando Fonseca, EPE, Amadora, Portugal.,Nova Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Guilherme Oliveira
- Department of Pathology, Ipatimup Diagnostics, Ipatimup, Porto, Portugal
| | - Fernando Schmitt
- Department of Pathology, Ipatimup Diagnostics, Ipatimup, Porto, Portugal.,FMUP, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Laboratoire national de santé, Dudelange, Luxembourg
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kwon S, Cho CH, Kwon Y, Lee ES, Park JK. A Microfluidic Immunostaining System Enables Quality Assured and Standardized Immunohistochemical Biomarker Analysis. Sci Rep 2017; 7:45968. [PMID: 28378835 PMCID: PMC5380984 DOI: 10.1038/srep45968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2016] [Accepted: 03/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) plays an important role in biomarker-driven cancer therapy. Although there has been a high demand for standardized and quality assured IHC, it has rarely been achieved due to the complexity of IHC testing and the subjective validation-based process flow of IHC quality control. We present here a microfluidic immunostaining system for the standardization of IHC by creating a microfluidic linearly graded antibody (Ab)-staining device and a reference cell microarray. Unlike conventional efforts, our system deals primarily with the screening of biomarker staining conditions for quantitative quality assurance testing in IHC. We characterized the microfluidic matching of Ab staining intensity using three HER2 Abs produced by different manufacturers. The quality of HER2 Ab was also validated using tissues of breast cancer patients, demonstrating that our system is an efficient and powerful tool for the standardization and quality assurance of IHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyong Kwon
- Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Hyun Cho
- Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
| | - Youngmee Kwon
- Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 10408, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Sook Lee
- Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 10408, Republic of Korea
| | - Je-Kyun Park
- Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.,KAIST Institute for Health Science and Technology, 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Valutazione Economica Dell'impatto Organizzativo di Differenti Tecniche di Ibridazione in Situ per la Determinazione Dello Stato di HER2 nel Carcinoma Alla Mammella. GLOBAL & REGIONAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 2017. [DOI: 10.5301/grhta.5000265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
23
|
Pfarr N, Penzel R, Endris V, Lier C, Flechtenmacher C, Volckmar AL, Kirchner M, Budczies J, Leichsenring J, Herpel E, Noske A, Weichert W, Schneeweiss A, Schirmacher P, Sinn HP, Stenzinger A. Targeted next-generation sequencing enables reliable detection of HER2 (ERBB2) status in breast cancer and provides ancillary information of clinical relevance. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2016; 56:255-265. [PMID: 27792260 DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2016] [Revised: 10/26/2016] [Accepted: 10/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
HER2-positive breast cancers are a heterogeneous group of tumors, which share amplification and overexpression of HER2. In routine diagnostics, the HER2 (ERBB2) status is currently assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH). Data on targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches that could be used to determine the HER2 status are sparse. Employing two breast cancer-related gene panels, we performed targeted NGS of 41 FFPE breast cancers for which full pathological work-up including ISH and IHC results was available. Selected cases were analyzed by qPCR. Of the 41 cases, the HER2 status of the 4 HER2-positive and 6 HER2-negative tumors was independently detected by our NGS approach achieving a concordance rate of 100%. The remaining 31 cases were equivocal HER2 cases by IHC of which 5 showed amplification of HER2 by ISH. Our NGS approach classified all non-amplified cases correctly as HER2 negative and corroborated all but one of the 5 cases with amplified HER2 as detected by ISH. For the overall cohort, concordance between the gold standard and NGS was 97.6% (sensitivity 88.9% and specificity 100%). Additionally, we observed mutations in PIK3CA (44%), HER2 (8%), and CDH1 (6%) among others. Amplifications were found in CCND1 (12%), followed by MYC (10%) and EGFR (2%) and deletions in CDKN2A (10%), MAP2K4 and PIK3R1 (2% each). We here show that targeted NGS data can be used to interrogate the HER2 status with high specificity and high concordance with gold standard methods. Moreover, this approach identifies additional genetic events that may be clinically exploitable. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Pfarr
- Institute of Pathology University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Institute of Pathology Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Roland Penzel
- Institute of Pathology University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Endris
- Institute of Pathology University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Clemens Lier
- Institute of Pathology University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Anna-Lena Volckmar
- Institute of Pathology University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martina Kirchner
- Institute of Pathology University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan Budczies
- Institute of Pathology Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jonas Leichsenring
- Institute of Pathology University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Esther Herpel
- Institute of Pathology University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Tissue Bank of the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aurelia Noske
- Institute of Pathology Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Wilko Weichert
- Institute of Pathology Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- Institute of Pathology University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Institute of Pathology University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wesseling J, Tinterri C, Sapino A, Zanconati F, Lutke-Holzik M, Nguyen B, Deck KB, Querzoli P, Perin T, Giardina C, Seitz G, Guinebretière JM, Barone J, Dekker L, de Snoo F, Stork-Sloots L, Roepman P, Watanabe T, Cusumano P. An international study comparing conventional versus mRNA level testing (TargetPrint) for ER, PR, and HER2 status of breast cancer. Virchows Arch 2016; 469:297-304. [DOI: 10.1007/s00428-016-1979-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2015] [Revised: 05/30/2016] [Accepted: 06/27/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
25
|
Furrer D, Sanschagrin F, Jacob S, Diorio C. Advantages and disadvantages of technologies for HER2 testing in breast cancer specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 2015; 144:686-703. [PMID: 26486732 DOI: 10.1309/ajcpt41tcbuevdqc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) plays a central role as a prognostic and predictive marker in breast cancer specimens. Reliable HER2 evaluation is central to determine the eligibility of patients with breast cancer to targeted anti-HER2 therapies such as trastuzumab and lapatinib. Presently, several methods exist for the determination of HER2 status at different levels (protein, RNA, and DNA level). METHODS In this review, we discuss the main advantages and disadvantages of the techniques developed so far for the evaluation of HER2 status in breast cancer specimens. RESULTS Each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages. It is therefore not surprising that no consensus has been reached so far on which technique is the best for the determination of HER2 status. CONCLUSIONS Currently, emphasis must be put on standardization of procedures, internal and external quality control assessment, and competency evaluation of already existing methods to ensure accurate, reliable, and clinically meaningful test results. Development of new robust and accurate diagnostic assays should also be encouraged. In addition, large clinical trials are warranted to identify the technique that most reliably predicts a positive response to anti-HER2 drugs.
Collapse
|
26
|
Not All Next Generation Sequencing Diagnostics are Created Equal: Understanding the Nuances of Solid Tumor Assay Design for Somatic Mutation Detection. Cancers (Basel) 2015; 7:1313-32. [PMID: 26193321 PMCID: PMC4586770 DOI: 10.3390/cancers7030837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2015] [Revised: 06/30/2015] [Accepted: 07/10/2015] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The molecular characterization of tumors using next generation sequencing (NGS) is an emerging diagnostic tool that is quickly becoming an integral part of clinical decision making. Cancer genomic profiling involves significant challenges including DNA quality and quantity, tumor heterogeneity, and the need to detect a wide variety of complex genetic mutations. Most available comprehensive diagnostic tests rely on primer based amplification or probe based capture methods coupled with NGS to detect hotspot mutation sites or whole regions implicated in disease. These tumor panels utilize highly customized bioinformatics pipelines to perform the difficult task of accurately calling cancer relevant alterations such as single nucleotide variations, small indels or large genomic alterations from the NGS data. In this review, we will discuss the challenges of solid tumor assay design/analysis and report a case study that highlights the need to include complementary technologies (i.e., arrays) and germline analysis in tumor testing to reliably identify copy number alterations and actionable variants.
Collapse
|
27
|
Ma H, Xu X, Ursin G, Simon MS, Marchbanks PA, Malone KE, Lu Y, McDonald JA, Folger SG, Weiss LK, Sullivan-Halley J, Deapen DM, Press MF, Bernstein L. Reduced risk of breast cancer associated with recreational physical activity varies by HER2 status. Cancer Med 2015; 4:1122-35. [PMID: 25924995 PMCID: PMC4529350 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2014] [Revised: 02/24/2015] [Accepted: 03/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Convincing epidemiologic evidence indicates that physical activity is inversely associated with breast cancer risk. Whether this association varies by the tumor protein expression status of the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), or p53 is unclear. We evaluated the effects of recreational physical activity on risk of invasive breast cancer classified by the four biomarkers, fitting multivariable unconditional logistic regression models to data from 1195 case and 2012 control participants in the population-based Women’s Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences Study. Self-reported recreational physical activity at different life periods was measured as average annual metabolic equivalents of energy expenditure [MET]-hours per week. Our biomarker-specific analyses showed that lifetime recreational physical activity was negatively associated with the risks of ER-positive (ER+) and of HER2-negative (HER2−) subtypes (both Ptrend ≤ 0.04), but not with other subtypes (all Ptrend > 0.10). Analyses using combinations of biomarkers indicated that risk of invasive breast cancer varied only by HER2 status. Risk of HER2–breast cancer decreased with increasing number of MET-hours of recreational physical activity in each specific life period examined, although some trend tests were only marginally statistically significant (all Ptrend ≤ 0.06). The test for homogeneity of trends (HER2– vs. HER2+ ) reached statistical significance only when evaluating physical activity during the first 10 years after menarche (Phomogeneity = 0.03). Our data suggest that physical activity reduces risk of invasive breast cancers that lack HER2 overexpression, increasing our understanding of the biological mechanisms by which physical activity acts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huiyan Ma
- Division of Cancer Etiology, Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California, 91010
| | - Xinxin Xu
- Division of Cancer Etiology, Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California, 91010
| | - Giske Ursin
- Cancer Registry of Norway, PB 5313 Majorstuen, 0304, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, 90033
| | - Michael S Simon
- Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, 48201
| | - Polly A Marchbanks
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, 30333
| | - Kathleen E Malone
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, 98109
| | - Yani Lu
- Division of Cancer Etiology, Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California, 91010
| | - Jill A McDonald
- College of Health and Social Services, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, 88003
| | - Suzanne G Folger
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, 30333
| | - Linda K Weiss
- Cancer Centers Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, 20850
| | - Jane Sullivan-Halley
- Division of Cancer Etiology, Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California, 91010
| | - Dennis M Deapen
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, 90033
| | - Michael F Press
- Department of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, 90033
| | - Leslie Bernstein
- Division of Cancer Etiology, Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California, 91010
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kwon S, Cho CH, Lee ES, Park JK. Automated Measurement of Multiple Cancer Biomarkers Using Quantum-Dot-Based Microfluidic Immunohistochemistry. Anal Chem 2015; 87:4177-83. [DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Seyong Kwon
- Department
of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-701, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Hyun Cho
- Department
of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-701, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Sook Lee
- Research
Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro,
Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 410-769, Republic of Korea
| | - Je-Kyun Park
- Department
of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-701, Republic of Korea
- KAIST Institute for the NanoCentury, 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-701, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Yardley DA, Kaufman PA, Huang W, Krekow L, Savin M, Lawler WE, Zrada S, Starr A, Einhorn H, Schwartzberg LS, Adams JW, Lie Y, Paquet AC, Sperinde J, Haddad M, Anderson S, Brigino M, Pesano R, Bates MP, Weidler J, Bosserman L. Quantitative measurement of HER2 expression in breast cancers: comparison with 'real-world' routine HER2 testing in a multicenter Collaborative Biomarker Study and correlation with overall survival. Breast Cancer Res 2015; 17:41. [PMID: 25886996 PMCID: PMC4391602 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-015-0543-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2014] [Accepted: 02/27/2015] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Accurate assessment of HER2 status is critical in determining appropriate therapy for breast cancer patients but the best HER2 testing methodology has yet to be defined. In this study, we compared quantitative HER2 expression by the HERmark™ Breast Cancer Assay (HERmark) with routine HER2 testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and correlated HER2 results with overall survival (OS) of breast cancer patients in a multicenter Collaborative Biomarker Study (CBS). Methods Two hundred and thirty-two formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissues and local laboratory HER2 testing results were provided by 11 CBS sites. HERmark assay and central laboratory HER2 IHC retesting were retrospectively performed in a blinded fashion. HER2 results by all testing methods were obtained in 192 cases. Results HERmark yielded a continuum of total HER2 expression (H2T) ranging from 0.3 to 403 RF/mm2 (approximately 3 logs). The distribution of H2T levels correlated significantly (P <0.0001) with all routine HER2 testing results. The concordance of positive and negative values (equivocal cases excluded) between HERmark and routine HER2 testing was 84% for local IHC, 96% for central IHC, 85% for local FISH, and 84% for local HER2 status. OS analysis revealed a significant correlation of shorter OS with HER2 positivity by local IHC (HR = 2.6, P = 0.016), central IHC (HR = 3.2, P = 0.015), and HERmark (HR = 5.1, P <0.0001) in this cohort of patients most of whom received no HER2-targeted therapy. The OS curve of discordant low (HER2 positive but H2T low, 10% of all cases) was aligned with concordant negative (HER2 negative and H2T low, HR = 1.9, P = 0.444), but showed a significantly longer OS than concordant positive (HER2 positive and H2T high, HR = 0.31, P = 0.024). Conversely, the OS curve of discordant high (HER2 negative but H2T high, 9% of all cases) was aligned with concordant positive (HR = 0.41, P = 0.105), but showed a significantly shorter OS than concordant negative (HR = 41, P <0.0001). Conclusions Quantitative HER2 measurement by HERmark is highly sensitive, accurately quantifies HER2 protein expression and correlates well with routine HER2 testing. When HERmark and local HER2 results were discordant, HERmark more accurately predicted overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise A Yardley
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, 3322 West End Avenue, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA. .,Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, 250 25th Avenue North, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA.
| | - Peter A Kaufman
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03766, USA.
| | - Weidong Huang
- Monogram Biosciences, Inc., 345 Oyster Point Boulevard, South San Francisco, CA, 37203, USA.
| | - Lea Krekow
- Texas Oncology Bedford, 1615 Hospital Parkway, Bedford, TX, 76022, USA.
| | - Michael Savin
- Texas Oncology and Medical City, 7777 Forest Lane, Dallas, TX, 75230, USA.
| | - William E Lawler
- St. Jude Heritage Medical Group, 2720 Harbor Boulevard, Fullerton, CA, 92835, USA.
| | - Stephen Zrada
- The Center for Cancer and Hematologic Disease, 1930 New Jersey 70 (East), Cherry Hill, NJ, 08003, USA.
| | - Alexander Starr
- Monroe Medical Associates, 71 Ald Taylor Way, Harvey, IL, 60426, USA.
| | - Harvey Einhorn
- Swedish American Regional Medical Center, 1401 East State Street, Rockford, IL, 61104, USA.
| | | | - John W Adams
- Arlington Cancer Center, 906 West Randol Mill Road, Arlington, TX, 76012, USA.
| | - Yolanda Lie
- Monogram Biosciences, Inc., 345 Oyster Point Boulevard, South San Francisco, CA, 37203, USA.
| | - Agnes C Paquet
- Monogram Biosciences, Inc., 345 Oyster Point Boulevard, South San Francisco, CA, 37203, USA. .,Present address: Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire-IPMC, Sophia Antipolis, 660 Route des Lucioles, 06560, Valbonne, France.
| | - Jeff Sperinde
- Monogram Biosciences, Inc., 345 Oyster Point Boulevard, South San Francisco, CA, 37203, USA.
| | - Mojgan Haddad
- Monogram Biosciences, Inc., 345 Oyster Point Boulevard, South San Francisco, CA, 37203, USA. .,Present address: HealthTell, 3130 Crow Canyon Place, San Ramon, CA, 94583, USA.
| | - Steve Anderson
- Monogram Biosciences, Inc., 345 Oyster Point Boulevard, South San Francisco, CA, 37203, USA.
| | - Marlon Brigino
- Center for Molecular Biology and Pathology, Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
| | - Rick Pesano
- Monogram Biosciences, Inc., 345 Oyster Point Boulevard, South San Francisco, CA, 37203, USA. .,Present address: Quest Diagnostics, 33608 Ortega Highway, San Juan Capistrano, CA, 92675, USA.
| | - Michael P Bates
- Monogram Biosciences, Inc., 345 Oyster Point Boulevard, South San Francisco, CA, 37203, USA. .,Present address: Cepheid, 904 East Caribbean Drive, Sunnyvale, CA, 94089, USA.
| | - Jodi Weidler
- Monogram Biosciences, Inc., 345 Oyster Point Boulevard, South San Francisco, CA, 37203, USA. .,Present address: Cepheid, 904 East Caribbean Drive, Sunnyvale, CA, 94089, USA.
| | - Linda Bosserman
- Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, 8283 Grove Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730, USA. .,Present address: City of Hope, 1500 East Duarte Road, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sanguedolce F, Bufo P. HER2 assessment by silver in situ hybridization: where are we now? Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2015; 15:385-98. [PMID: 25578771 DOI: 10.1586/14737159.2015.992416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
HER2 testing in breast and gastric cancer is critical not only as a prognostic tool but also as a predictive marker for response to the humanized monoclonal antibody trastuzumab. Currently, HER2 status is assessed on histological and cytological specimens by conventional validated methods such as immunohistochemistry and FISH, while bright-field in situ hybridization techniques, such as silver in situ hybridization and chromogenic in situ hybridization, may offer performance benefits over FISH. The major points are first, technical issues, advantages and disadvantages relevant to each methods, and their clinical implications and second, the well-known genetic heterogeneity of HER2, and the occurrence of polysomy of chromosome 17. This review aims to summarize the growing body of literature on the accuracy of bright-field in situ techniques, notably silver in situ hybridization, in assessing HER2 status, and to discuss the role of such methods in pathology practice.
Collapse
|
31
|
de Gramont A, Watson S, Ellis LM, Rodón J, Tabernero J, de Gramont A, Hamilton SR. Pragmatic issues in biomarker evaluation for targeted therapies in cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2014; 12:197-212. [PMID: 25421275 DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Predictive biomarkers are becoming increasingly important tools in drug development and clinical research. The importance of using both guidelines for specimen acquisition and analytical methods for biomarker measurements that are standardized has become recognized widely as an important issue, which must be addressed in order to provide high-quality, validated assays. Herein, we review the major challenges in biomarker validation processes, including pre-analytical (sample-related), analytical, and post-analytical (data-related) aspects of assay development. Recommendations for improving biomarker assay development and method validation are proposed to facilitate the use of predictive biomarkers in clinical trials and the practice of oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armand de Gramont
- New Drug Evaluation Laboratory, Centre of Experimental Therapeutics, Department of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sarah Watson
- INSERM U830, Genetics and Biology of Paediatric Tumours Group, Institut Curie, France
| | - Lee M Ellis
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, and Molecular and Cellular Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA
| | - Jordi Rodón
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (UAB), Spain
| | - Josep Tabernero
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (UAB), Spain
| | - Aimery de Gramont
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Hospitalier Franco-Britannique, France
| | - Stanley R Hamilton
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Fitzgibbons PL, Bradley LA, Fatheree LA, Alsabeh R, Fulton RS, Goldsmith JD, Haas TS, Karabakhtsian RG, Loykasek PA, Marolt MJ, Shen SS, Smith AT, Swanson PE. Principles of analytic validation of immunohistochemical assays: Guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2014; 138:1432-43. [PMID: 24646069 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0610-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 198] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Laboratories must validate all assays before they can be used to test patient specimens, but currently there are no evidence-based guidelines regarding validation of immunohistochemical assays. OBJECTIVE To develop recommendations for initial analytic validation and revalidation of immunohistochemical assays. DESIGN The College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center convened a panel of pathologists and histotechnologists with expertise in immunohistochemistry to develop validation recommendations. A systematic evidence review was conducted to address key questions. Electronic searches identified 1463 publications, of which 126 met inclusion criteria and were extracted. Individual publications were graded for quality, and the key question findings for strength of evidence. Recommendations were derived from strength of evidence, open comment feedback, and expert panel consensus. RESULTS Fourteen guideline statements were established to help pathology laboratories comply with validation and revalidation requirements for immunohistochemical assays. CONCLUSIONS Laboratories must document successful analytic validation of all immunohistochemical tests before applying to patient specimens. The parameters for cases included in validation sets, including number, expression levels, fixative and processing methods, should take into account intended use and should be sufficient to ensure that the test accurately measures the analyte of interest in specimens tested in that laboratory. Recommendations are also provided for confirming assay performance when there are changes in test methods, reagents, or equipment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick L Fitzgibbons
- From the Department of Pathology, St. Jude Medical Center, Fullerton, California (Dr Fitzgibbons); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Women & Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Dr Bradley); the College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Ms Fatheree and Mr Smith); the Department of Pathology, Kaiser Permanente - Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (Dr Alsabeh); PhenoPath Laboratories, Seattle, Washington (Dr Fulton); the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Goldsmith); the Department of Pathology, Mercy Hospital, Janesville, Wisconsin (Dr Haas); the Department of Pathology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, New York (Dr Karabakhtsian); Regional Medical Laboratory, St John's Medical Center, Tulsa, Oklahoma (Ms Loykasek); the Department of Pathology, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Fairview, Minneapolis (Dr Marolt); the Department of Pathology, The Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas (Dr Shen); and the Department of Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle (Dr Swanson)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cytoplasmic EGFR Staining and Gene Amplification in Glottic Cancer. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2014; 22:674-80. [DOI: 10.1097/pai.0000000000000014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
34
|
Concomitant detection of HER2 protein and gene alterations by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and silver enhanced in situ hybridization (SISH) identifies HER2 positive breast cancer with and without gene amplification. PLoS One 2014; 9:e105961. [PMID: 25153153 PMCID: PMC4143343 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2014] [Accepted: 07/24/2014] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction HER2 status assessment became a mandatory test assay in breast cancer, giving prognostic and predictive information including eligibility for adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy. Precise and reliable assessment of HER2 status is therefore of utmost importance. In this study we analyzed breast cancer samples by a novel technology for concomitant detection of the HER2 protein and gene copy number. Methods Tissue microarrays containing 589 invasive breast cancer samples were analyzed with a double immunohistochemistry (IHC) and silver labeled in situ hybridization (SISH) assay simultaneously detecting HER2 protein and gene copy number in the same tumor cells. This bright-field assay was analyzed using scores according to the modified ASCO guidelines and the results were correlated with patient prognosis. Results Overall concordance rate between protein expression and the presence of gene amplification was 98%. Fifty-seven of 60 tumors (95%) with IHC score 3+, 6 of 10 tumors with IHC score 2+ (60%) and only 3 of 519 tumors (0.6%) with IHC score 0/1+ were amplified by SISH. Patients with gene amplification despite IHC score 0/1+ had a tendency for worse overall survival (p = 0.088, reaching nearly statistical significance) compared to IHC score 0/1+ without amplification. In contrast, there was no difference in overall survival in IHC score 3+/2+ tumors with and without gene amplification. Conclusions The novel double IHC and SISH assay for HER2 is efficient in the identification of breast cancer with discordant HER2 protein and HER2 gene status, especially for the prognostically relevant groups of HER2 protein negative tumors with HER2 amplification and HER2 protein positive tumors without HER2 amplification. Breast cancer without HER2 amplification among IHC score 2+/3+ tumors (10% in our cohort) suggests that other mechanisms than gene amplification contribute to protein overexpression in these cells.
Collapse
|
35
|
Sineshaw HM, Gaudet M, Ward EM, Flanders WD, Desantis C, Lin CC, Jemal A. Association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer subtypes in the National Cancer Data Base (2010-2011). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 145:753-63. [PMID: 24794028 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-2976-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2014] [Accepted: 04/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
To estimate the odds of breast cancer subtypes in minority populations versus non-Hispanic (NH) whites stratified by socioeconomic status (SES) [a composite of individual-level SES (insurance status) and area-level SES (median household income quartile from 2000 U.S. Census data)] using a large nationwide cancer database. We used the National Cancer Data Base to identify breast cancer cases diagnosed in 2010 and 2011, the only 2 years since U.S. cancer registries uniformly began collecting HER2 results. Breast cancer cases were classified into five subtypes based on hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status: HR+/HER2-, HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2+ (HER2-overexpressing), HR-/HER2- (TN), and unknown. A polytomous logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) comparing the odds of non-HR+/HER2-subtypes to HR+/HER2- for racial/ethnic groups controlling for and stratifying by SES, using a composite of insurance status and area-level income. Compared with NH whites, NH blacks and Hispanics were 84 % (OR = 1.84; 95 % CI 1.77-1.92) and 17 % (OR = 1.17; 95 % CI 1.11-1.24) more likely to have TN subtype versus HR+/HER2-, respectively. Asian/Pacific Islanders (API) had 1.45 times greater odds of being diagnosed with HER2-overexpressing subtype versus HR+/HER2- compared with NH whites (OR = 1.45; 95 % CI 1.31-1.61). We found similar ORs for race in high and low strata of SES. In a large nationwide hospital-based dataset, we found higher odds of having TN breast cancer in black women and of HER2-overexpressing in API compared with white women in every level of SES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helmneh M Sineshaw
- American Cancer Society, Inc.,, 250 Williams Street NW, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Interpretation of HER2 tests in gastric cancer: confirmation of interobserver differences and validation of a QA/QC educational program. Virchows Arch 2014; 464:539-45. [DOI: 10.1007/s00428-014-1567-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2013] [Revised: 01/08/2014] [Accepted: 02/23/2014] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
37
|
Cornejo KM, Kandil D, Khan A, Cosar EF. Theranostic and molecular classification of breast cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2014; 138:44-56. [PMID: 24377811 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0442-ra] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Despite advances in breast cancer management, women continue to relapse and die of breast cancer. Traditionally, evaluation for hormone receptors (estrogen and progesterone), as well as HER2 overexpression, have guided therapy-related decision-making because they are both prognostic and predictive indicators. However, there are limitations with those studies, which can lead to improper treatment. Gene signatures have recently been shown to be of value in identifying molecular portraits of breast carcinoma and are beginning to play role in management and treatment algorithms. OBJECTIVE To provide a summary of the prognostic and predictive indicators of breast cancer, such as hormone receptors, HER2, and molecular gene signatures that currently help guide clinical decision making. DATA SOURCES Published articles from peer-reviewed journals in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine). CONCLUSIONS Emerging evidence shows promise that, in addition to hormone receptors and HER2 studies, evaluating tumors with gene expression profiling can provide additional prognostic and predictive information, further aiding clinical management and leading to a more personalized approach to treating breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine M Cornejo
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, Allred DC, Bartlett JMS, Bilous M, Fitzgibbons P, Hanna W, Jenkins RB, Mangu PB, Paik S, Perez EA, Press MF, Spears PA, Vance GH, Viale G, Hayes DF. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2014; 138:241-56. [PMID: 24099077 PMCID: PMC4086638 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0953-sa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 813] [Impact Index Per Article: 81.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing and its utility as a predictive marker in invasive breast cancer. METHODS ASCO/CAP convened an Update Committee that included coauthors of the 2007 guideline to conduct a systematic literature review and update recommendations for optimal HER2 testing. RESULTS The Update Committee identified criteria and areas requiring clarification to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization (ISH). The guideline was reviewed and approved by both organizations. RECOMMENDATIONS The Update Committee recommends that HER2 status (HER2 negative or positive) be determined in all patients with invasive (early stage or recurrence) breast cancer on the basis of one or more HER2 test results (negative, equivocal, or positive). Testing criteria define HER2-positive status when (on observing within an area of tumor that amounts to >10% of contiguous and homogeneous tumor cells) there is evidence of protein overexpression (IHC) or gene amplification (HER2 copy number or HER2/CEP17 ratio by ISH based on counting at least 20 cells within the area). If results are equivocal (revised criteria), reflex testing should be performed using an alternative assay (IHC or ISH). Repeat testing should be considered if results seem discordant with other histopathologic findings. Laboratories should demonstrate high concordance with a validated HER2 test on a sufficiently large and representative set of specimens. Testing must be performed in a laboratory accredited by CAP or another accrediting entity. The Update Committee urges providers and health systems to cooperate to ensure the highest quality testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio C Wolff
- Antonio C. Wolff, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore; Lisa M. McShane, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; M. Elizabeth H. Hammond, University of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT; David G. Hicks, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Mitch Dowsett, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Kimberly H. Allison, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford; Patrick Fitzgibbons, St Jude Medical Center, Fullerton; Michael F. Press, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Donald C. Allred, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; John M.S. Bartlett, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; Wedad Hanna, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Michael Bilous, University of Western Sydney and Healthscope Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Robert B. Jenkins, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Soonmyung Paik, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pitsburgh, PA; Edith A. Perez, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Patricia A. Spears, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC; Gail H. Vance, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN; Giuseppe Viale, University of Milan, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; and Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Care Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
van Rooijen JM, de Munck L, de Graaf JC, Siesling S, de Vries EG, Boers JE. Limited human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 discordance in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab, a population based study. Eur J Cancer 2014; 50:885-91. [PMID: 24491395 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2013] [Revised: 10/28/2013] [Accepted: 01/12/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate assessment of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in breast cancer is essential for proper treatment decisions. HER2 positivity confirmation rates in breast cancer trials by central testing pathology laboratories were reported to be approximately 85%. The aim of our study was to assess in a population based sample concordance of HER2 status in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients locally tested HER2 positive and treated with trastuzumab. Moreover cost-effectiveness of in situ hybridisation (ISH) in patients with an immunohistochemical score 3+ (IHC3+) was explored. METHODS MBC patients treated between 2005 and 2009 with trastuzumab-based therapy in North East Netherlands were identified by a survey of hospital pharmacies. Primary tumour samples were retested centrally for HER2 status using 1 immunohistochemical (IHC) method and two methods using ISH on tissue micro-arrays. Potential discordant patients were retested on whole tumour slides. HER2 positivity was defined as: (1) ISH amplification (according to American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) clinical practice Guideline Update) and (2) when ISH failed an IHC score of 3+. Cost-effectiveness was estimated using potential ISH and treatment costs. RESULTS HER2 status could be retested in 174 of 194 (90%) patients. The HER2 concordance rate was 87%. The 21 discordant patients were in the 67% due to primary HER2 testing with only IHC. Overall survival of HER2 discordant and concordant patients was not significantly different (18 versus 25months, p=0.131). Structural ISH in the case of IHC3+ has an estimated potential saving of €87,710 per 100 patients. CONCLUSION HER2 concordance in a population based study is comparable to those described in selected populations. Discordance is mostly due to testing with only IHC. ISH in the case of IHC3+ is cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M van Rooijen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - L de Munck
- Department of Research, Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J C de Graaf
- Department of Internal Medicine, Isala Klinieken Zwolle, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - S Siesling
- Department of Research, Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands; MIRA Institute, Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - E G de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J E Boers
- Department of Pathology, Isala Klinieken Zwolle, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Central pathology laboratory review of HER2 and ER in early breast cancer: an ALTTO trial [BIG 2-06/NCCTG N063D (Alliance)] ring study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 143:485-92. [PMID: 24395109 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2827-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2013] [Accepted: 12/23/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Choice of therapy for breast cancer relies on human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) and estrogen receptor α (ER) status. Before randomization in the phase III Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimisation (ALTTO) trial for HER2-positive disease, HER2 and ER were centrally reviewed by Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, and Scottsdale, AZ) for North America and by the European Institute of Oncology (IEO; Milan, Italy) for the rest of world (except China). Discordance rates (local vs. central review) differed between Mayo and IEO. Among locally HER2-positive cases, 5.8 % (Mayo) and 14.5 % (IEO) were centrally HER2 negative. Among locally ER-positive cases, 16.2 % (Mayo) and 4.2 % (IEO) were centrally ER-negative. Among locally ER-negative cases, 3.4 % (Mayo) and 21.4 % (IEO) were centrally ER-positive. We, therefore, performed a ring study to identify features contributing to these differing discordance rates. Mayo and IEO exchanged slides for 25 HER2 and 35 ER locally/centrally discordant cases. Both laboratories performed IHC and FISH for HER2 using the HercepTest(®) and PathVysion HER2 DNA probe kit/HER2/centromere 17 probe mixture. IHC for ER was tested centrally using the monoclonal ER 1D5 antibody (Mayo) or the DAKO cocktail of ER 1D5 and 2.123 antibodies (IEO). Mayo and IEO confirmed the central HER2-negative result in 100 % of 25 cases. Mayo and IEO confirmed the central ER result in 29 (85 %) of 34 evaluable cases. The five Mayo-negative/IEO-positive cases were ER-positive when retested at Mayo using the DAKO ER cocktail. In this ring study, ALTTO ineligibility did not change when HER2 testing was performed by either IEO or Mayo central laboratories. However, a dual antibody ER assay had fewer false-negative test results than an assay with a single antibody, and there was more discordance between the two ER reagents than has been previously reported. Using even slightly different assay methods yielded different results, even between experienced central laboratories.
Collapse
|
41
|
Varga Z, Noske A, Ramach C, Padberg B, Moch H. Assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer: overall positivity rate and accuracy by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry in a single institution over 12 years: a quality control study. BMC Cancer 2013; 13:615. [PMID: 24377754 PMCID: PMC3879657 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2013] [Accepted: 12/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The gold standard of HER2 status assessment in breast cancer is still debated. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in-situ technology as fluorescent-labeled methodology (FISH) can be influenced by pre-analytical factors, assay-conditions and interpretation of test results. We retrospectively conducted this quality control study and analyzed HER2 test results in breast cancer within the routine diagnostic service in a single institution over a period of 12 years. We addressed the question how stable and concordant IHC and FISH methods are and whether HER2 positivity rate has changed over this period. Methods Data of 7714 consecutive HER2-FISH-assays in a period of 12 years (2001–2012) on breast cancer biopsies and excision specimens were retrospectively analyzed. From 2001 to 2004, FISH tests were performed from all cases with IHC score 3+ and 2+ (and in some tumors with IHC score 1+ and 0). From 2005–2010, HER2 status was only determined by FISH. From 2011–2012, all breast carcinomas were analyzed by both IHC and FISH. Scoring and cut-off-definition were done according to time-current ASCO-CAP and FDA-guidelines. Results Between 2001–2004, IHC score 3+ was diagnosed in 22% of cases, 69% of these 3+ cases were amplified by FISH. 6% of IHC score 0/1+ cases were amplified by FISH. There was a mean amplification rate of 15.8% (range 13 -19%) using FISH only HER2-assays (2005–2010). Starting 2008, a slight drop in the amplification rate from 17% to 14% was noticed due to the modified ASCO-criteria in 2007. From 2011–2012, 12% of cases were 3+ by IHC, 84% of them were amplified by FISH. Less than 1% of IHC score 0/1+ cases were amplified by FISH. Concordance between FISH and IHC increased from 83% to 97%. Conclusions Our quality control study demonstrates that HER2 positivity rate remained stable by FISH-technology but showed a significant variation by IHC over the analyzed 12 years. Improvement in concordance rate was due to standardization of pre-analytical factors, scoring and interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zsuzsanna Varga
- Institute of Surgical Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, Allred DC, Bartlett JMS, Bilous M, Fitzgibbons P, Hanna W, Jenkins RB, Mangu PB, Paik S, Perez EA, Press MF, Spears PA, Vance GH, Viale G, Hayes DF. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31:3997-4013. [PMID: 24101045 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.50.9984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2907] [Impact Index Per Article: 264.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing and its utility as a predictive marker in invasive breast cancer. METHODS ASCO/CAP convened an Update Committee that included coauthors of the 2007 guideline to conduct a systematic literature review and update recommendations for optimal HER2 testing. RESULTS The Update Committee identified criteria and areas requiring clarification to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization (ISH). The guideline was reviewed and approved by both organizations. RECOMMENDATIONS The Update Committee recommends that HER2 status (HER2 negative or positive) be determined in all patients with invasive (early stage or recurrence) breast cancer on the basis of one or more HER2 test results (negative, equivocal, or positive). Testing criteria define HER2-positive status when (on observing within an area of tumor that amounts to > 10% of contiguous and homogeneous tumor cells) there is evidence of protein overexpression (IHC) or gene amplification (HER2 copy number or HER2/CEP17 ratio by ISH based on counting at least 20 cells within the area). If results are equivocal (revised criteria), reflex testing should be performed using an alternative assay (IHC or ISH). Repeat testing should be considered if results seem discordant with other histopathologic findings. Laboratories should demonstrate high concordance with a validated HER2 test on a sufficiently large and representative set of specimens. Testing must be performed in a laboratory accredited by CAP or another accrediting entity. The Update Committee urges providers and health systems to cooperate to ensure the highest quality testing. This guideline was developed through a collaboration between the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists and has been published jointly by invitation and consent in both Journal of Clinical Oncology and the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio C Wolff
- Antonio C. Wolff, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore; Lisa M. McShane, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; M. Elizabeth H. Hammond, University of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT; David G. Hicks, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Mitch Dowsett, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Kimberly H. Allison, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford; Patrick Fitzgibbons, St Jude Medical Center, Fullerton; Michael F. Press, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Donald C. Allred, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; John M.S. Bartlett, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; Wedad Hanna, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Michael Bilous, University of Western Sydney and Healthscope Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Robert B. Jenkins, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Soonmyung Paik, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA; Edith A. Perez, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Patricia A. Spears, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC; Gail H. Vance, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN; Giuseppe Viale, University of Milan, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; and Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Care Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lim SJ, Cantillep A, Carpenter PM. Validation and workflow optimization of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing using INFORM HER2 dual-color in situ hybridization. Hum Pathol 2013; 44:2590-6. [PMID: 24075600 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2013] [Revised: 06/29/2013] [Accepted: 07/03/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status is useful for predicting response to trastuzumab. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER2 gene amplification is accurate but limited because of cost, the need for fluorescence microscopy, the limited assessment of histology, and the fading of its signal over time. Dual-color in situ hybridization (Dual ISH) is fully automated, is viewable by bright-field microscopy, has a stable signal, and has separate colors for HER2 and chromosome 17 signals. HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC), FISH, and Dual ISH were performed on 101 breast cancer cases. Sixteen of 17 cases with 3+ HER2 by IHC showed gene amplification by FISH, and 15 showed amplification by Dual ISH. Three of the 2+ IHC cases were either amplified or equivocal by Dual ISH. None of the IHC-negative cases were amplified by either FISH or Dual ISH. Dual ISH agreed with FISH in 93% of cases. Among the 6 discrepancies, 4 were for an equivocal result for 1 test compared with either a positive or a negative result for the other test. The average differences in readings between Dual ISH and FISH in the discrepant cases were only 0.02, with a range of -1.37 to 1.85. Turnaround time for FISH as a send-out test from test ordering to reporting averaged 8.27 workdays, whereas the turnaround time for Dual ISH performed in-house averaged 4.94 workdays (P < .0000001). Our results indicated that automated Dual ISH is a useful method for evaluating HER2 status in a clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung-Jig Lim
- Department of Pathology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul 134-727, South Korea
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Terrenato I, Arena V, Pizzamiglio S, Pennacchia I, Perracchio L, Buglioni S, Ercolani C, Sperati F, Costarelli L, Bonanno E, Baldini D, Candia S, Crescenzi A, Dal Mas A, Di Cristofano C, Gomes V, Grillo LR, Pasquini P, Pericoli MN, Ramieri MT, Di Stefano D, Ruco L, Scarpino S, Vitolo D, d’Amati G, Paradiso A, Verderio P, Mottolese M. External Quality Assessment (EQA) program for the preanalytical and analytical immunohistochemical determination of HER2 in breast cancer: an experience on a regional scale. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2013; 32:58. [PMID: 23965490 PMCID: PMC3766003 DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-32-58] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2013] [Accepted: 08/10/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An External Quality Assessment (EQA) program was developed to investigate the state of the art of HER2 immunohistochemical determination in breast cancer (BC) in 16 Pathology Departments in the Lazio Region (Italy). This program was implemented through two specific steps to evaluate HER2 staining (step 1) and interpretation (step 2) reproducibility among participants. METHODS The management activities of this EQA program were assigned to the Coordinating Center (CC), the Revising Centers (RCs) and the Participating Centers (PCs). In step 1, 4 BC sections, selected by RCs, were stained by each PC using their own procedures. In step 2, each PC interpreted HER2 score in 10 BC sections stained by the CC. The concordance pattern was evaluated by using the kappa category-specific statistic and/or the weighted kappa statistic with the corresponding 95% Jackknife confidence interval. RESULTS In step 1, a substantial/almost perfect agreement was reached between the PCs for scores 0 and 3+ whereas a moderate and fair agreement was observed for scores 1+ and 2+, respectively.In step 2, a fully satisfactory agreement was observed for 6 out of the 16 PCs and a quite satisfactory agreement was obtained for the remaining 10 PCs. CONCLUSIONS Our findings highlight that in the whole HER2 evaluation process the two intermediate categories, scores 1+ and 2+, are less reproducible than scores 0 and 3+. These findings are relevant in clinical practice where the choice of treatment is based on HER2 positivity, suggesting the need to share evaluation procedures within laboratories and implement educational programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Terrenato
- Biostatistic Unit, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Arena
- Institute of Pathology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Pizzamiglio
- Unit of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Bioinformatics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Pennacchia
- Institute of Pathology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Rome, Italy
| | - Letizia Perracchio
- Pathology Department, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, Rome, 00144, Italy
| | - Simonetta Buglioni
- Pathology Department, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, Rome, 00144, Italy
| | - Cristiana Ercolani
- Pathology Department, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, Rome, 00144, Italy
| | - Francesca Sperati
- Biostatistic Unit, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Leopoldo Costarelli
- Department of Pathology, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Via dell’Amba Aradam 9, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Bonanno
- Anatomic Pathology, Dept of Biomedicine and Prevention University of Rome Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Baldini
- Pathology Department, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Via Martinotti 20, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Candia
- Pathology Department, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Via dei Monti Tiburtini 385, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Crescenzi
- Pathology Department, Regina Apostolorum Hospital, Via S.Francesco 50, Albano Laziale, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Dal Mas
- Pathology Department, San Salvatore Hospital, Via Vetoio-Coppito, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Claudio Di Cristofano
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, I.C.O.T, Via Franco Faggiana 68, Latina, Italy
| | - Vito Gomes
- Pathology Department, Bel Colle Hospital, Strada S. Martinese, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Lucia Rosalba Grillo
- Pathology Department, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Via Gianicolense 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Pasquini
- Pathology Department, Coelio Military Hospital, Piazza Cellimontana 50, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Domenica Di Stefano
- Department of Cytology and Histology, University of Rome La Sapienza, Ospedale S. Andrea, Via di Grottarossa 1035, Rome, 00189, Italy
| | - Luigi Ruco
- Department of Cytology and Histology, University of Rome La Sapienza, Ospedale S. Andrea, Via di Grottarossa 1035, Rome, 00189, Italy
| | - Stefania Scarpino
- Department of Cytology and Histology, University of Rome La Sapienza, Ospedale S. Andrea, Via di Grottarossa 1035, Rome, 00189, Italy
| | - Domenico Vitolo
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale Regina Elena 324, Rome, 00161, Italy
| | - Giulia d’Amati
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale Regina Elena 324, Rome, 00161, Italy
| | - Angelo Paradiso
- Clinical Experimental Oncology Department, National Cancer Research Centre, Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy
| | - Paolo Verderio
- Unit of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Bioinformatics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Marcella Mottolese
- Pathology Department, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, Rome, 00144, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Jacquemier J, Spyratos F, Esterni B, Mozziconacci MJ, Antoine M, Arnould L, Lizard S, Bertheau P, Lehmann-Che J, Fournier CB, Krieger S, Bibeau F, Lamy PJ, Chenard MP, Legrain M, Guinebretière JM, Loussouarn D, Macgrogan G, Hostein I, Mathieu MC, Lacroix L, Valent A, Robin YM, Revillion F, Triki ML, Seaume A, Salomon AV, de Cremoux P, Portefaix G, Xerri L, Vacher S, Bièche I, Penault-Llorca F. SISH/CISH or qPCR as alternative techniques to FISH for determination of HER2 amplification status on breast tumors core needle biopsies: a multicenter experience based on 840 cases. BMC Cancer 2013; 13:351. [PMID: 23875536 PMCID: PMC3729815 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2013] [Accepted: 06/28/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Until now, FISH has been the gold standard technique to identify HER2 amplification status in ambiguous cases of breast cancer. Alternative techniques have been developed to increase the capacities of investigating HER2 amplification status. The aims of this multicenter study in a large series of breast cancer patients were to prospectively compare the level of performance of CISH, SISH, and qPCR alternative techniques on paraffin-embedded core biopsies with "gold standard FISH" for evaluation of HER2 amplification status. METHODS This study was performed on 840 cases scored by immunohistochemistry (IHC): 0=317 (38%), 1+=183 (22%), 2+=109 (13%), 3+=231 (27%). Each of the 15 French centers participating in the study analyzed 56 breast carcinoma cases diagnosed on fixed paraffin-embedded core biopsies. HER2 amplification status was determined by commercially available FISH used as the reference technique with determination of the HER2/CEN17 ratio or HER2 copy number status. The alternative techniques performed on the same cases were commercially available SISH or CISH and a common qPCR method especially designed for the study including a set of 10 primer pairs: 2 for HER2 (exons 8 and 26), 5 to evaluate chromosome 17 polysomy TAOK1, UTP6, MRM1, MKS1, SSTR2 and 3 for diploidy control TSN, LAP3 and ADAMTS16. RESULTS The concordance between IHC and FISH was 96% to 95% based on the HER2/CEN17 ratio (n=766) or HER2 copy number (n=840), respectively. The concordance of the alternative techniques with FISH was excellent: 97% and 98% for SISH (498 and 587 cases), 98% and 75% for CISH (108 and 204 cases) and 95% and 93% (699 and 773 cases) for qPCR based on the HER2/CEN17 ratio or HER2 copy number, respectively. Similarly, sensitivity ranged from 99% to 95% for SISH, 100% to 99% for CISH and 89% to 80% for qPCR. The concordance with FISH (ratio) in the 2+ cases was 89% for SISH, 100% for CISH and 93% for qPCR. CONCLUSION These alternative techniques showed an excellent concordance with FISH in core biopsies allowing their use in routine clinical practice. This newly designed qPCR on paraffin-embedded core biopsies deserves special attention, as it is reliable, easy to perform and less expensive than ISH tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jocelyne Jacquemier
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, biopathology department, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Nunes CB, Rocha RM, Buzelin MA, Balabram D, de Souza Foureaux F, Porto SS, Gobbi H. False positivity in HER2 testing of breast cancer: novel paths for approaching an old dilemma. J Clin Pathol 2013; 66:946-50. [PMID: 23867547 DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Variability in determining HER2 status has been reported, especially, differences in sensitivity and specificity among commercially available antibodies, with false positive and false negative results. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of five anti-HER2 antibodies by immunohistochemistry (IHC), using the new dual colour brightfield in situ hybridisation (DDISH) as the gold standard, on invasive breast carcinomas (IBC) arrays. MATERIAL AND METHODS Serial sections from tissue microarrays (TMA) containing 200 preselected primary IBC were submitted to DDISH (VENTANA INFORM HER2 Dual ISH assay), and immunohistochemistry, using Dako A0485 and HercepTest (polyclonal), Novocastra CB11 (mouse monoclonal), NeoMarkers SP3 and Ventana 4B5 (rabbit monoclonal). RESULTS From the initial 200 cases, 184 were assessed by DDISH and IHC. The concordance among the antibodies was considered very good (kappa statistics varied from 0.82 to 0.9). The overall concordance between IHC and DDISH ranged from 94.1% for CB11 to 96.6% for A0485. The antibodies A0485, HercepTest, SP3 and 4B5 were over 95% sensitive and specific. CB11 was the most specific antibody (97.1%). 60% (CB11) to 83.3% (SP3) of the 2+ cases showed no gene amplification by DDISH. False negative cases varied from 0.5% (A0485) to 3.8% (CB11) of the cases, and false positive from 1.6% (CB11) to 2.7% (HercepTest, SP3 and 4B5) of the 184 cases. CONCLUSIONS There was very good agreement among the five anti-HER2 antibodies. CB11 was the most specific antibody, but showed more false negative cases. A0485, SP3, 4B5 and HercepTest were highly sensitive and specific, but showed more false positive cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiana Buzelin Nunes
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, , Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Berezowska S, Novotny A, Bauer K, Feuchtinger A, Slotta-Huspenina J, Becker K, Langer R, Walch A. Association between HSP90 and Her2 in gastric and gastroesophageal carcinomas. PLoS One 2013; 8:e69098. [PMID: 23874879 PMCID: PMC3708885 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2013] [Accepted: 06/04/2013] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Her2 expression and amplification occurs in a significant subset of gastro-esophageal carcinomas. Her2 is a client protein of molecular chaperones, e.g. heat shock protein (HSP) 90, rendering targeted therapies against Her2/HSP90 an interesting approach. This study aimed to investigate the role and relationship of Her2 and HSP90 in gastric and gastro-esophageal adenocarcinomas. Material and Methods Immunohistochemical determination of HSP90 and Her2 expression was performed on 347 primary resected tumors. Her2 amplification was additionally determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization for all cases. Expression and amplification results were correlated with pathologic parameters (UICC pTNM category, tumor grading) and survival. Results Elevated Her2 copy numbers were observed in 87 tumors, 21 of them showing amplification. 174 tumors showed Her2 immunoreactivity/expression. HSP 90 immunoreactivity was found in 125 tumors. There was no difference between gastric carcinomas and carcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction regarding Her2 or HSP90. Both high HSP90 and Her2 expression/amplification were associated with earlier tumor stages (p<0.01), absence of lymph node metastases (p<0.02) and Laurens intestinal type (p<0.001). HSP90 correlated with Her2 expression and amplification (p<0.001 each). Expressions of HSP90 and Her2, but not Her2 amplification were associated with better prognosis (p=0.02; p=0.004; p=0.802). Moreover, Her2 expression was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in the subgroup of gastric carcinoma patients (p=0.014) besides pT category, pN category and distant metastases. Conclusion Her2 expression and gene amplification occurred in a significant subset of cases. Our results suggest a favorable prognostic impact of Her2 expression. This warrants further investigations regarding the significance of Her2 non-amplified tumors showing Her2 immunoreactivity and the definition of Her2 status in gastric cancers. Moreover, the correlation of Her2 expression with the expression of Her2 chaperoning HSP90 may indicate a synergistic regulation. Targeting HSP90 with or without Her2 may offer additional therapeutic options for gastric carcinoma treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Berezowska
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- * E-mail:
| | - Alexander Novotny
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Karina Bauer
- Institute of Pathology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Annette Feuchtinger
- Institute of Pathology- Research Unit Analytical Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | | | - Karen Becker
- Institute of Pathology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Rupert Langer
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Axel Walch
- Institute of Pathology- Research Unit Analytical Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kaidar-Person O, Lai C, Kuten A, Belkacemi Y. "The Infinite Maze" of breast cancer, signaling pathways and radioresistance. Breast 2013; 22:411-8. [PMID: 23642528 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2012] [Revised: 03/16/2013] [Accepted: 04/03/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The parallel growth in our understanding of tumor biology and genetics might be the key to understanding local recurrence after optimal treatment is applied. Data suggest that genetic alterations and breast cancer molecular subtypes have an effect on radiotherapy efficacy and that the HER2, EGFR/PI3K/Akt signaling pathways play a pivotal role in modulation of post-irradiation survival. These pathways have been found to be involved in radiosensitivity and/or radioresistance, tumor cell proliferation, and hypoxia. Therefore, affecting the functional activity of key players combined with radiotherapy might be the future of breast irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orit Kaidar-Person
- Division of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, and Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Staratschek-Jox A, Schultze JL. Re-overcoming barriers in translating biomarkers to clinical practice. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013; 4:103-12. [PMID: 23484444 DOI: 10.1517/17530051003657647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD Recently, there has been growing evidence for the concept of personalized medicine as the implementation of genomic and molecular information in the delivery of healthcare. In parallel, the identification of biomarkers has become of enormous significance as a prerequisite for individualized intervention regimens. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW Biomarkers are developed to improve prevention, diagnosis or therapeutic outcome of a given disease. Although each application reveals distinct developmental strategies, evidence-based approval of new biomarkers is important for the success of new drugs, diagnostic tests or recommendations in preventive medicine. Current hurdles to bringing biomarkers into clinical practice are reviewed, thereby focusing on adequate approaches to overcome these limitations in the future. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN The reader will get an introduction to strategies resolving actual barriers in clinical biomarker development. TAKE HOME MESSAGE The identification of evidence-based biomarkers is crucial for the success of individualized therapeutic approaches. Developmental strategies have to be adapted to clinical need, thereby focusing on biomarker validation in clinical settings as well as on the establishment of standardized biomarker test systems for routine application. Consortia have been established bringing together representatives of government, academia and industry to improve future biomarker development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Staratschek-Jox
- University of Bonn, Genomics and Immunoregulation, LIMES (Life and Medical Sciences Bonn), Program Unit Molecular Immune and Cell Biology, Carl Troll Str. 31, D-53115 Bonn, Germany +49 228 73 62779 ; +49 228 73 62646 ;
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Measurement of HER2 in saliva of women in risk of breast cancer. Pathol Oncol Res 2013; 19:509-13. [PMID: 23479082 DOI: 10.1007/s12253-013-9610-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2012] [Accepted: 08/09/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
HER2 amplification can be present in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The aim of the present study was to test the feasibility of measuring soluble HER2 in the saliva of patients at risk of breast cancer towards early diagnosis and prognosis. Women with lesions classified as 4 according to BIRADS and women with spontaneous nipple discharge (NAF) were recruited for this study. Quantification of soluble HER2 in saliva was performed using the enzyme immunoassay ELISA. Median values of HER2 were quantified in saliva of the control groups and in the patient groups. The statistical test nonparametric Mann-Whitney was applied for the evaluation of median differences. Although the medians increased with the severity of the clinical status, no significant difference was found in all possibilities (p > 0.05) when comparing the medians among the patients groups. Interestingly, inter-individual HER2 quantity variations in the saliva were detected in this study in some subjects from each group. Considering possible inter-individual variations, research on saliva-based circulating HER2 has to be reinforced to ensure its correct application in diagnosis, treatment and in follow-up of breast cancer patients. Older and current issues surrounding the controversy about the appropriate methods for HER2 evaluation are discussed.
Collapse
|