1
|
Malogolovkin A, Gasanov N, Egorov A, Weener M, Ivanov R, Karabelsky A. Combinatorial Approaches for Cancer Treatment Using Oncolytic Viruses: Projecting the Perspectives through Clinical Trials Outcomes. Viruses 2021; 13:1271. [PMID: 34209981 PMCID: PMC8309967 DOI: 10.3390/v13071271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent cancer immunotherapy breakthroughs have fundamentally changed oncology and revived the fading hope for a cancer cure. The immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) became an indispensable tool for the treatment of many malignant tumors. Alongside ICI, the application of oncolytic viruses in clinical trials is demonstrating encouraging outcomes. Dozens of combinations of oncolytic viruses with conventional radiotherapy and chemotherapy are widely used or studied, but it seems quite complicated to highlight the most effective combinations. Our review summarizes the results of clinical trials evaluating oncolytic viruses with or without genetic alterations in combination with immune checkpoint blockade, cytokines, antigens and other oncolytic viruses as well. This review is focused on the efficacy and safety of virotherapy and the most promising combinations based on the published clinical data, rather than presenting all oncolytic virus variations, which are discussed in comprehensive literature reviews. We briefly revise the research landscape of oncolytic viruses and discuss future perspectives in virus immunotherapy, in order to provide an insight for novel strategies of cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Malogolovkin
- Gene Therapy Department, Sirius University of Science and Technology, Olympic Avenue, 1, 354340 Sochi, Russia; (N.G.); (A.E.); (M.W.); (R.I.)
| | | | | | | | | | - Alexander Karabelsky
- Gene Therapy Department, Sirius University of Science and Technology, Olympic Avenue, 1, 354340 Sochi, Russia; (N.G.); (A.E.); (M.W.); (R.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kottke T, Tonne J, Evgin L, Driscoll CB, van Vloten J, Jennings VA, Huff AL, Zell B, Thompson JM, Wongthida P, Pulido J, Schuelke MR, Samson A, Selby P, Ilett E, McNiven M, Roberts LR, Borad MJ, Pandha H, Harrington K, Melcher A, Vile RG. Oncolytic virotherapy induced CSDE1 neo-antigenesis restricts VSV replication but can be targeted by immunotherapy. Nat Commun 2021; 12:1930. [PMID: 33772027 PMCID: PMC7997928 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22115-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In our clinical trials of oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus expressing interferon beta (VSV-IFNβ), several patients achieved initial responses followed by aggressive relapse. We show here that VSV-IFNβ-escape tumors predictably express a point-mutated CSDE1P5S form of the RNA-binding Cold Shock Domain-containing E1 protein, which promotes escape as an inhibitor of VSV replication by disrupting viral transcription. Given time, VSV-IFNβ evolves a compensatory mutation in the P/M Inter-Genic Region which rescues replication in CSDE1P5S cells. These data show that CSDE1 is a major cellular co-factor for VSV replication. However, CSDE1P5S also generates a neo-epitope recognized by non-tolerized T cells. We exploit this predictable neo-antigenesis to drive, and trap, tumors into an escape phenotype, which can be ambushed by vaccination against CSDE1P5S, preventing tumor escape. Combining frontline therapy with escape-targeting immunotherapy will be applicable across multiple therapies which drive tumor mutation/evolution and simultaneously generate novel, targetable immunopeptidomes associated with acquired treatment resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Kottke
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jason Tonne
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Laura Evgin
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Jacob van Vloten
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Victoria A Jennings
- Chester Beatty Laboratories, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Amanda L Huff
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Brady Zell
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jill M Thompson
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Jose Pulido
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Adel Samson
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Peter Selby
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Elizabeth Ilett
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Mark McNiven
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lewis R Roberts
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mitesh J Borad
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Hardev Pandha
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Kevin Harrington
- Chester Beatty Laboratories, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Alan Melcher
- Chester Beatty Laboratories, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Richard G Vile
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pol JG, Bridle BW, Lichty BD. Detection of Tumor Antigen-Specific T-Cell Responses After Oncolytic Vaccination. Methods Mol Biol 2020; 2058:191-211. [PMID: 31486039 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9794-7_12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Oncolytic vaccines, which consist of recombinant oncolytic viruses (OV) encoding tumor-associated antigens (TAAs), have demonstrated potent antitumor efficacy in preclinical models and are currently evaluated in phase I/II clinical trials. On one hand, oncolysis of OV-infected malignant entities reinstates cancer immunosurveillance. On the other hand, overexpression of TAAs in infected cells further stimulates the adaptive arm of antitumor immunity. Particularly, the presence of tumor-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes within the tumor microenvironment, as well as in the periphery, has demonstrated prognostic value for cancer treatments. These effector CD8+ T cells can be detected through their production of the prototypical Tc1 cytokine: IFN-γ. The quantitative and qualitative assessment of this immune cell subset remains critical in the development process of efficient cancer vaccines, including oncolytic vaccines. The present chapter will describe a single-cell immunological assay, namely the intracellular cytokine staining (ICS), that allows the enumeration of IFN-γ-producing TAA-specific CD8+ T cells in various tissues (tumor, blood, lymphoid organs) following oncolytic vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan G Pol
- Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Villejuif, France. .,INSERM, U1138, Paris, France. .,Equipe 11 Labellisée par la Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France. .,Université de Paris, Paris, France. .,Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
| | - Byram W Bridle
- Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Brian D Lichty
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. .,Turnstone Biologics, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sivanandam V, LaRocca CJ, Chen NG, Fong Y, Warner SG. Oncolytic Viruses and Immune Checkpoint Inhibition: The Best of Both Worlds. MOLECULAR THERAPY-ONCOLYTICS 2019; 13:93-106. [PMID: 31080879 PMCID: PMC6503136 DOI: 10.1016/j.omto.2019.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy and the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors have markedly changed the treatment paradigm for many cancers. They function to disrupt cancer cell evasion of the immune response and activate sustained anti-tumor immunity. Oncolytic viruses have also emerged as an additional therapeutic agent for cancer treatment. These viruses are designed to target and kill tumor cells while leaving the normal cells unharmed. As part of this process, oncolytic virus infection stimulates anti-cancer immune responses that augment the efficacy of checkpoint inhibition. These viruses have the capability of transforming a “cold” tumor microenvironment with few immune effector cells into a “hot” environment with increased immune cell and cytokine infiltration. For this reason, there are multiple ongoing clinical trials that combine oncolytic virotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. This review will detail the key oncolytic viruses in preclinical and clinical studies and highlight the results of their testing with checkpoint inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venkatesh Sivanandam
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | | | - Nanhai G Chen
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Yuman Fong
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Susanne G Warner
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Taggart D, Andreou T, Scott KJ, Williams J, Rippaus N, Brownlie RJ, Ilett EJ, Salmond RJ, Melcher A, Lorger M. Anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 efficacy in melanoma brain metastases depends on extracranial disease and augmentation of CD8 + T cell trafficking. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018; 115:E1540-E1549. [PMID: 29386395 PMCID: PMC5816160 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1714089115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Inhibition of immune checkpoints programmed death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) on T cells results in durable antitumor activity in melanoma patients. Despite high frequency of melanoma brain metastases (BrM) and associated poor prognosis, the activity and mechanisms of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in metastatic tumors that develop within the "immune specialized" brain microenvironment, remain elusive. We established a melanoma tumor transplantation model with intracranial plus extracranial (subcutaneous) tumor, mimicking the clinically observed coexistence of metastases inside and outside the brain. Strikingly, intracranial ICI efficacy was observed only when extracranial tumor was present. Extracranial tumor was also required for ICI-induced increase in CD8+ T cells, macrophages, and microglia in brain tumors, and for up-regulation of immune-regulatory genes. Combined PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade had a superior intracranial efficacy over the two monotherapies. Cell depletion studies revealed that NK cells and CD8+ T cells were required for intracranial anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 efficacy. Rather than enhancing CD8+ T cell activation and expansion within intracranial tumors, PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade dramatically (∼14-fold) increased the trafficking of CD8+ T cells to the brain. This was mainly through the peripheral expansion of homing-competent effector CD8+ T cells and potentially further enhanced through up-regulation of T cell entry receptors intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and vascular adhesion molecule 1 on tumor vasculature. Our study indicates that extracranial activation/release of CD8+ T cells from PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibition and potentiation of their recruitment to the brain are paramount to the intracranial anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 activity, suggesting augmentation of these processes as an immune therapy-enhancing strategy in metastatic brain cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Taggart
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
- MRC Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, United Kingdom
| | - Tereza Andreou
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
| | - Karen J Scott
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Williams
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
| | - Nora Rippaus
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca J Brownlie
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth J Ilett
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
| | - Robert J Salmond
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Melcher
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
- The Institute of Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
| | - Mihaela Lorger
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pierini S, Perales-Linares R, Uribe-Herranz M, Pol JG, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G, Facciabene A, Galluzzi L. Trial watch: DNA-based vaccines for oncological indications. Oncoimmunology 2017; 6:e1398878. [PMID: 29209575 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2017.1398878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA-based vaccination is a promising approach to cancer immunotherapy. DNA-based vaccines specific for tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) are indeed relatively simple to produce, cost-efficient and well tolerated. However, the clinical efficacy of DNA-based vaccines for cancer therapy is considerably limited by central and peripheral tolerance. During the past decade, considerable efforts have been devoted to the development and characterization of novel DNA-based vaccines that would circumvent this obstacle. In this setting, particular attention has been dedicated to the route of administration, expression of modified TAAs, co-expression of immunostimulatory molecules, and co-delivery of immune checkpoint blockers. Here, we review preclinical and clinical progress on DNA-based vaccines for cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Pierini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Ovarian Cancer Research Center (OCRC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Renzo Perales-Linares
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Ovarian Cancer Research Center (OCRC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mireia Uribe-Herranz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Ovarian Cancer Research Center (OCRC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jonathan G Pol
- Université Paris Descartes/Paris V, France.,Université Pierre et Marie Curie/Paris VI, Paris.,Equipe 11 labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France.,INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Laurence Zitvogel
- Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Villejuif, France.,INSERM, Villejuif, France.,Center of Clinical Investigations in Biotherapies of Cancer (CICBT), Villejuif, France.,Université Paris Sud/Paris XI, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Guido Kroemer
- Université Paris Descartes/Paris V, France.,Université Pierre et Marie Curie/Paris VI, Paris.,Equipe 11 labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France.,INSERM, Paris, France.,Metabolomics and Cell Biology Platforms, Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Villejuif, France.,Karolinska Institute, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Pôle de Biologie, Hopitâl Européen George Pompidou, AP-HP; Paris, France
| | - Andrea Facciabene
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Ovarian Cancer Research Center (OCRC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lorenzo Galluzzi
- Université Paris Descartes/Paris V, France.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Taking a Stab at Cancer; Oncolytic Virus-Mediated Anti-Cancer Vaccination Strategies. Biomedicines 2017; 5:biomedicines5010003. [PMID: 28536346 PMCID: PMC5423491 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines5010003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2016] [Revised: 12/20/2016] [Accepted: 12/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccines have classically been used for disease prevention. Modern clinical vaccines are continuously being developed for both traditional use as well as for new applications. Typically thought of in terms of infectious disease control, vaccination approaches can alternatively be adapted as a cancer therapy. Vaccines targeting cancer antigens can be used to induce anti-tumour immunity and have demonstrated therapeutic efficacy both pre-clinically and clinically. Various approaches now exist and further establish the tremendous potential and adaptability of anti-cancer vaccination. Classical strategies include ex vivo-loaded immune cells, RNA- or DNA-based vaccines and tumour cell lysates. Recent oncolytic virus development has resulted in a surge of novel viruses engineered to induce powerful tumour-specific immune responses. In addition to their use as cancer vaccines, oncolytic viruses have the added benefit of being directly cytolytic to cancer cells and thus promote antigen recognition within a highly immune-stimulating tumour microenvironment. While oncolytic viruses are perfectly equipped for efficient immunization, this complicates their use upon previous exposure. Indeed, the host's anti-viral counter-attacks often impair multiple-dosing regimens. In this review we will focus on the use of oncolytic viruses for anti-tumour vaccination. We will explore different strategies as well as ways to circumvent some of their limitations.
Collapse
|
8
|
Holay N, Kim Y, Lee P, Gujar S. Sharpening the Edge for Precision Cancer Immunotherapy: Targeting Tumor Antigens through Oncolytic Vaccines. Front Immunol 2017; 8:800. [PMID: 28751892 PMCID: PMC5507961 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2017] [Accepted: 06/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy represents a promising, modern-age option for treatment of cancers. Among the many immunotherapies being developed, oncolytic viruses (OVs) are slowly moving to the forefront of potential clinical therapeutic agents, especially considering the fact that the first oncolytic virus was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of melanoma. OVs were originally discovered for their ability to kill cancer cells, but they have emerged as unconventional cancer immunotherapeutics due to their ability to activate a long-term antitumor immune response. This immune response not only eliminates cancer cells but also offers potential for preventing cancer recurrence. A fundamental requirement for the generation of such a strong antitumor T cell response is the recognition of an immunogenic tumor antigen by the antitumor T cell. Several tumor antigens capable of activating these antitumor T cells have been identified and are now being expressed through genetically engineered OVs to potentiate antitumor immunity. With the emergence of novel technologies for identifying tumor antigens and immunogenic epitopes in a myriad of cancers, design of "oncolytic vaccines" expressing highly specific tumor antigens provides a great strategy for targeting tumors. Here, we highlight the various OVs engineered to target tumor antigens and discuss multiple studies and strategies used to develop oncolytic vaccine regimens. We also contend how, going forward, a combination of technologies for identifying novel immunogenic tumor antigens and rational design of oncolytic vaccines will pave the way for the next generation of clinically efficacious cancer immunotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Namit Holay
- Department of Pathology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Youra Kim
- Department of Pathology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Patrick Lee
- Department of Pathology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Shashi Gujar
- Department of Pathology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Centre for Innovative and Collaborative Health Sciences Research, Quality and System Performance, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
- *Correspondence: Shashi Gujar,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ilett E, Kottke T, Thompson J, Rajani K, Zaidi S, Evgin L, Coffey M, Ralph C, Diaz R, Pandha H, Harrington K, Selby P, Bram R, Melcher A, Vile R. Prime-boost using separate oncolytic viruses in combination with checkpoint blockade improves anti-tumour therapy. Gene Ther 2017; 24:21-30. [PMID: 27779616 PMCID: PMC5387692 DOI: 10.1038/gt.2016.70] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2016] [Revised: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 10/04/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The anti-tumour effects associated with oncolytic virus therapy are mediated significantly through immune-mediated mechanisms, which depend both on the type of virus and the route of delivery. Here, we show that intra-tumoral oncolysis by Reovirus induced the priming of a CD8+, Th1-type anti-tumour response. By contrast, systemically delivered Vesicular Stomatitis Virus expressing a cDNA library of melanoma antigens (VSV-ASMEL) promoted a potent anti-tumour CD4+ Th17 response. Therefore, we hypothesised that combining the Reovirus-induced CD8+ T cell response, with the VSV-ASMEL CD4+ Th17 helper response, would produce enhanced anti-tumour activity. Consistent with this, priming with intra-tumoral Reovirus, followed by an intra-venous VSV-ASMEL Th17 boost, significantly improved survival of mice bearing established subcutaneous B16 melanoma tumours. We also show that combination of either therapy alone with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade augmented both the Th1 response induced by systemically delivered Reovirus in combination with GM-CSF, and also the Th17 response induced by VSV-ASMEL. Significantly, anti-PD-1 also uncovered an anti-tumour Th1 response following VSV-ASMEL treatment that was not seen in the absence of checkpoint blockade. Finally, the combination of all three treatments (priming with systemically delivered Reovirus, followed by double boosting with systemic VSV-ASMEL and anti-PD-1) significantly enhanced survival, with long-term cures, compared to any individual, or double, combination therapies, associated with strong Th1 and Th17 responses to tumour antigens. Our data show that it is possible to generate fully systemic, highly effective anti-tumour immunovirotherapy by combining oncolytic viruses, along with immune checkpoint blockade, to induce complementary mechanisms of anti-tumour immune responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Ilett
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - T Kottke
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - J Thompson
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - K Rajani
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - S Zaidi
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - L Evgin
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - M Coffey
- Oncolytics Biotech Incorporated, Calgary, Canada
| | - C Ralph
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | - H Pandha
- University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | | | - P Selby
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - R Bram
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - A Melcher
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - R Vile
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kottke T, Shim KG, Alonso-Camino V, Zaidi S, Maria Diaz R, Pulido J, Thompson J, Rajani KR, Evgin L, Ilett E, Pandha H, Harrington K, Selby P, Melcher A, Vile R. Immunogenicity of self tumor associated proteins is enhanced through protein truncation. Mol Ther Oncolytics 2016; 3:16030. [PMID: 27933315 PMCID: PMC5142466 DOI: 10.1038/mto.2016.30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2016] [Accepted: 10/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
We showed previously that therapy with Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV) expressing tumor-associated proteins eradicates established tumors. We show here that when cellular cDNA were cloned into VSV which retained their own poly-A signal, viral species emerged in culture which had deleted the cellular poly-A signal and also contained a truncated form of the protein coding sequence. Typically, the truncation occurred such that a Tyrosine-encoding codon was converted into a STOP codon. We believe that the truncation of tumor-associated proteins expressed from VSV in this way occurred to preserve the ability of the virus to replicate efficiently. Truncated cDNA expressed from VSV were significantly more effective than full length cDNA in treating established tumors. Moreover, tumor therapy with truncated cDNA was completely abolished by depletion of CD4+ T cells, whereas therapy with full length cDNA was CD8+ T cell dependent. These data show that the type/potency of antitumor immune responses against self-tumor-associated proteins can be manipulated in vivo through the nature of the self protein (full length or truncated). Therefore, in addition to generation of neoantigens through sequence mutation, immunological tolerance against self-tumor-associated proteins can be broken through manipulation of protein integrity, allowing for rational design of better self-immunogens for cancer immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Kottke
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kevin G Shim
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Shane Zaidi
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Rosa Maria Diaz
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jose Pulido
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jill Thompson
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Karishma R Rajani
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Laura Evgin
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elizabeth Ilett
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Center, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Peter Selby
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Center, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Richard Vile
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Center, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Allan KJ, Stojdl DF, Swift SL. High-throughput screening to enhance oncolytic virus immunotherapy. Oncolytic Virother 2016; 5:15-25. [PMID: 27579293 PMCID: PMC4996253 DOI: 10.2147/ov.s66217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
High-throughput screens can rapidly scan and capture large amounts of information across multiple biological parameters. Although many screens have been designed to uncover potential new therapeutic targets capable of crippling viruses that cause disease, there have been relatively few directed at improving the efficacy of viruses that are used to treat disease. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are biotherapeutic agents with an inherent specificity for treating malignant disease. Certain OV platforms – including those based on herpes simplex virus, reovirus, and vaccinia virus – have shown success against solid tumors in advanced clinical trials. Yet, many of these OVs have only undergone minimal engineering to solidify tumor specificity, with few extra modifications to manipulate additional factors. Several aspects of the interaction between an OV and a tumor-bearing host have clear value as targets to improve therapeutic outcomes. At the virus level, these include delivery to the tumor, infectivity, productivity, oncolysis, bystander killing, spread, and persistence. At the host level, these include engaging the immune system and manipulating the tumor microenvironment. Here, we review the chemical- and genome-based high-throughput screens that have been performed to manipulate such parameters during OV infection and analyze their impact on therapeutic efficacy. We further explore emerging themes that represent key areas of focus for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K J Allan
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute; Department of Biology, Microbiology and Immunology
| | - David F Stojdl
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute; Department of Biology, Microbiology and Immunology; Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - S L Swift
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rajani KR, Vile RG. Harnessing the Power of Onco-Immunotherapy with Checkpoint Inhibitors. Viruses 2015; 7:5889-901. [PMID: 26580645 PMCID: PMC4664987 DOI: 10.3390/v7112914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2015] [Revised: 10/26/2015] [Accepted: 10/29/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Oncolytic viruses represent a diverse class of replication competent viruses that curtail tumor growth. These viruses, through their natural ability or through genetic modifications, can selectively replicate within tumor cells and induce cell death while leaving normal cells intact. Apart from the direct oncolytic activity, these viruses mediate tumor cell death via the induction of innate and adaptive immune responses. The field of oncolytic viruses has seen substantial advancement with the progression of numerous oncolytic viruses in various phases of clinical trials. Tumors employ a plethora of mechanisms to establish growth and subsequently metastasize. These include evasion of immune surveillance by inducing up-regulation of checkpoint proteins which function to abrogate T cell effector functions. Currently, antibodies blocking checkpoint proteins such as anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) have been approved to treat cancer and shown to impart durable clinical responses. These antibodies typically need pre-existing active immune tumor microenvironment to establish durable clinical outcomes and not every patient responds to these therapies. This review provides an overview of published pre-clinical studies demonstrating superior therapeutic efficacy of combining oncolytic viruses with checkpoint blockade compared to monotherapies. These studies provide compelling evidence that oncolytic therapy can be potentiated by coupling it with checkpoint therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karishma R Rajani
- Department of Molecular Medicine; Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Richard G Vile
- Department of Molecular Medicine; Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cockle JV, Rajani K, Zaidi S, Kottke T, Thompson J, Diaz RM, Shim K, Peterson T, Parney IF, Short S, Selby P, Ilett E, Melcher A, Vile R. Combination viroimmunotherapy with checkpoint inhibition to treat glioma, based on location-specific tumor profiling. Neuro Oncol 2015; 18:518-27. [PMID: 26409567 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2015] [Accepted: 07/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic delivery of a complementary cDNA library expressed from the vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) treats tumors by vaccinating against a wide range of tumor associated antigens (TAAs). For subcutaneous B16 melanomas, therapy was achieved using a specific combination of self-TAAs (neuroblastoma-Ras, cytochrome c, and tyrosinase-related protein 1) expressed from VSV. However, for intracranial B16 tumors, a different combination was therapeutic (consisting of VSV-expressed hypoxia-inducible factor [HIF]-2α, Sox-10, c-Myc, and tyrosinase-related protein 1). Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that tumors of different histological types growing in the brain share a common immunogenic signature which can be exploited for immunotherapy. METHODS Syngeneic tumors, including GL261 gliomas, in the brains of immune competent mice were analyzed for their antigenic profiles or were treated with systemic viroimmunotherapy. RESULTS Several different histological types of tumors growing intracranially, as well as freshly resected human brain tumor explants, expressed a HIF-2α(Hi) phenotype imposed by brain-derived CD11b+ cells. This location-specific antigen expression was exploited therapeutically against intracranial GL261 gliomas using systemically delivered VSV expressing HIF-2α, Sox-10, and c-Myc. Viroimmunotherapy was enhanced by immune checkpoint inhibitors, associated with the de-repression of antitumor T-helper cell type 1 (Th1) interferon-γ and Th17 T cell responses. CONCLUSIONS Since different tumor types growing in the same location in the brain share a location-specific phenotype, we suggest that antigen-specific immunotherapies should be based upon expression of both histological type-specific tumor antigens and location-specific antigens. Our findings support clinical application of VSV-TAA therapy with checkpoint inhibition for aggressive brain tumors and highlight the importance of the intracranial microenvironment in sculpting a location-specific profile of tumor antigen expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia V Cockle
- Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK (J.V.C., S.S., P.S., E.I., A.M., R.V.); Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (K.R., S.Z., T.K., J.T., R.M.D., K.S., R.V.); Division of Cancer Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London, UK (S.Z., R.V.); Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (T.P., I.F.P.)
| | - Karishma Rajani
- Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK (J.V.C., S.S., P.S., E.I., A.M., R.V.); Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (K.R., S.Z., T.K., J.T., R.M.D., K.S., R.V.); Division of Cancer Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London, UK (S.Z., R.V.); Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (T.P., I.F.P.)
| | - Shane Zaidi
- Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK (J.V.C., S.S., P.S., E.I., A.M., R.V.); Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (K.R., S.Z., T.K., J.T., R.M.D., K.S., R.V.); Division of Cancer Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London, UK (S.Z., R.V.); Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (T.P., I.F.P.)
| | - Timothy Kottke
- Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK (J.V.C., S.S., P.S., E.I., A.M., R.V.); Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (K.R., S.Z., T.K., J.T., R.M.D., K.S., R.V.); Division of Cancer Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London, UK (S.Z., R.V.); Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (T.P., I.F.P.)
| | - Jill Thompson
- Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK (J.V.C., S.S., P.S., E.I., A.M., R.V.); Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (K.R., S.Z., T.K., J.T., R.M.D., K.S., R.V.); Division of Cancer Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London, UK (S.Z., R.V.); Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (T.P., I.F.P.)
| | - Rosa Maria Diaz
- Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK (J.V.C., S.S., P.S., E.I., A.M., R.V.); Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (K.R., S.Z., T.K., J.T., R.M.D., K.S., R.V.); Division of Cancer Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London, UK (S.Z., R.V.); Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (T.P., I.F.P.)
| | - Kevin Shim
- Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK (J.V.C., S.S., P.S., E.I., A.M., R.V.); Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (K.R., S.Z., T.K., J.T., R.M.D., K.S., R.V.); Division of Cancer Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London, UK (S.Z., R.V.); Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (T.P., I.F.P.)
| | - Tim Peterson
- Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK (J.V.C., S.S., P.S., E.I., A.M., R.V.); Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (K.R., S.Z., T.K., J.T., R.M.D., K.S., R.V.); Division of Cancer Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London, UK (S.Z., R.V.); Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (T.P., I.F.P.)
| | - Ian F Parney
- Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK (J.V.C., S.S., P.S., E.I., A.M., R.V.); Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (K.R., S.Z., T.K., J.T., R.M.D., K.S., R.V.); Division of Cancer Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London, UK (S.Z., R.V.); Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (T.P., I.F.P.)
| | - Susan Short
- Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK (J.V.C., S.S., P.S., E.I., A.M., R.V.); Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (K.R., S.Z., T.K., J.T., R.M.D., K.S., R.V.); Division of Cancer Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London, UK (S.Z., R.V.); Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (T.P., I.F.P.)
| | - Peter Selby
- Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK (J.V.C., S.S., P.S., E.I., A.M., R.V.); Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (K.R., S.Z., T.K., J.T., R.M.D., K.S., R.V.); Division of Cancer Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London, UK (S.Z., R.V.); Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (T.P., I.F.P.)
| | - Elizabeth Ilett
- Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK (J.V.C., S.S., P.S., E.I., A.M., R.V.); Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (K.R., S.Z., T.K., J.T., R.M.D., K.S., R.V.); Division of Cancer Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London, UK (S.Z., R.V.); Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (T.P., I.F.P.)
| | - Alan Melcher
- Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK (J.V.C., S.S., P.S., E.I., A.M., R.V.); Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (K.R., S.Z., T.K., J.T., R.M.D., K.S., R.V.); Division of Cancer Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London, UK (S.Z., R.V.); Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (T.P., I.F.P.)
| | - Richard Vile
- Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK (J.V.C., S.S., P.S., E.I., A.M., R.V.); Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (K.R., S.Z., T.K., J.T., R.M.D., K.S., R.V.); Division of Cancer Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London, UK (S.Z., R.V.); Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (T.P., I.F.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Definitive Management of Oligometastatic Melanoma in a Murine Model Using Combined Ablative Radiation Therapy and Viral Immunotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 93:577-87. [PMID: 26461000 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.2274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2015] [Revised: 07/13/2015] [Accepted: 07/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The oligometastatic state is an intermediate state between a malignancy that can be completely eradicated with conventional modalities and one in which a palliative approach is undertaken. Clinically, high rates of local tumor control are possible with stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR), using precisely targeted, high-dose, low-fraction radiation therapy. However, in oligometastatic melanoma, virtually all patients develop progression systemically at sites not initially treated with ablative radiation therapy that cannot be managed with conventional chemotherapy and immunotherapy. We have demonstrated in mice that intravenous administration of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) expressing defined tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) generates systemic immune responses capable of clearing established tumors. Therefore, in the present preclinical study, we tested whether the combination of systemic VSV-mediated antigen delivery and SABR would be effective against oligometastatic disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS We generated a model of oligometastatic melanoma in C57BL/6 immunocompetent mice and then used a combination of SABR and systemically administered VSV-TAA viral immunotherapy to treat both local and systemic disease. RESULTS Our data showed that SABR generates excellent control or cure of local, clinically detectable, and accessible tumor through direct cell ablation. Also, the immunotherapeutic activity of systemically administered VSV-TAA generated T-cell responses that cleared subclinical metastatic tumors. We also showed that SABR induced weak T-cell-mediated tumor responses, which, particularly if boosted by VSV-TAA, might contribute to control of local and systemic disease. In addition, VSV-TAA therapy alone had significant effects on control of both local and metastatic tumors. CONCLUSIONS We have shown in the present preliminary murine study using a single tumor model that this approach represents an effective, complementary combination therapy model that addresses the need for both systemic and local control in oligometastatic melanoma.
Collapse
|