MSCs isolated from patients with ischemic vascular disease have normal angiogenic potential

Insights into Inflammatory Priming of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Validation of Extracellular Vesicles-Embedded miRNA Reference Genes as A Crucial Step for Donor Selection

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are promising tools for cell-based therapies due to their homing to injury sites, where they secrete bioactive factors such as cytokines, lipids, and nucleic acids, either free or conveyed within extracellular vesicles (EVs). Depending on the local environment, MSCs’ therapeutic value may be modulated, determining their fate and cell behavior. Inflammatory signals may induce critical changes on both the phenotype and secretory portfolio. Intriguingly, in animal models resembling joint diseases as osteoarthritis (OA), inflammatory priming enhanced the healing capacity of MSC-derived EVs. In this work, we selected miRNA reference genes (RGs) from the literature (let-7a-5p, miR-16-5p, miR-23a-3p, miR-26a-5p, miR-101-3p, miR-103a-3p, miR-221-3p, miR-423-5p, miR-425-5p, U6 snRNA), using EVs isolated from adipose-derived MSCs (ASCs) primed with IFNγ (iASCs). geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and ΔCt methods identified miR-26a-5p/16-5p as the most stable, while miR-103a-rp/425-5p performed poorly. Our results were validated on miRNAs involved in OA cartilage trophism. Only a proper normalization strategy reliably identified the differences between donors, a critical factor to empower the therapeutic value of future off-the-shelf MSC-EV isolates. In conclusion, the proposed pipeline increases the accuracy of MSC-EVs embedded miRNAs assessment, and help predicting donor variability for precision medicine approaches.

Secreted trophic factors of mesenchymal stem cells support neurovascular and musculoskeletal therapies

Adult mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) represent a subject of intense experimental and biomedical interest. Recently, trophic activities of MSCs have become the topic of a number of revealing studies that span both basic and clinical fields. In this review, we focus on recent investigations that have elucidated trophic mechanisms and shed light on MSC clinical efficacy relevant to musculoskeletal applications. Innate differences due to MSC sourcing may play a role in the clinical utility of isolated MSCs. Pain management, osteochondral, nerve, or blood vessel support by MSCs derived from both autologous and allogeneic sources have been examined. Recent mechanistic insights into the trophic activities of these cells point to ultimate regulation by nitric oxide, nuclear factor-kB, and indoleamine, among other signaling pathways. Classic growth factors and cytokines-such as VEGF, CNTF, GDNF, TGF-β, interleukins (IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8), and C-C ligands (CCL-2, CCL-5, and CCL-23)-serve as paracrine control molecules secreted or packaged into extracellular vesicles, or exosomes, by MSCs. Recent studies have also implicated signaling by microRNAs contained in MSC-derived exosomes. The response of target cells is further regulated by their microenvironment, involving the extracellular matrix, which may be modified by MSC-produced matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitor of MMPs. Trophic activities of MSCs, either resident or introduced exogenously, are thus intricately controlled, and may be further fine-tuned via implant material modifications. MSCs are actively being investigated for the repair and regeneration of both osteochondral and other musculoskeletal tissues, such as tendon/ligament and meniscus. Future rational and effective MSC-based musculoskeletal therapies will benefit from better mechanistic understanding of MSC trophic activities, for example using analytical "-omics" profiling approaches.

Donor variability among anti-inflammatory pre-activated mesenchymal stromal cells

Therapeutic mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are attractive in part due to their immunomodulatory properties, achieved by their paracrine secretion of factors including prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Despite promising pre-clinical data, demonstrating clinical efficacy has proven difficult. The current studies were designed to develop approaches to pre-induce desired functions from naïve MSCs and examine MSC donor variability, two factors contributing to this disconnect. MSCs from six human donors were pre-activated with interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) at a concentration and duration identified as optimal or interferon gamma (IFN-γ) as a comparator. Their secretion of PGE2 after pre-activation and secondary exposure to pro-inflammatory molecules was measured. Modulation of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) secretion from M1 pro-inflammatory macrophages by co-cultured pre-activated MSCs was also measured. Our results indicated that pre-activation of MSCs with IL-1β resulted in upregulated PGE2 secretion post exposure. Pre-activation with IL-1β or IFN-γ resulted in higher sensitivity to induction by secondary stimuli compared to no pre-activation. While IL-1β pre-activation led to enhanced MSC-mediated attenuation of macrophage TNF-α secretion, IFN-γ pre-activation resulted in enhanced TNF-α secretion. Donor variability was noted in PGE2 secretion and upregulation and the level of improved or impaired macrophage modulation.

In vitro models for assessing therapeutic angiogenesis

Arterial obstruction leading to ischemia causes a reduction of oxygen and nutrient supply to distal tissues. The physiological response to tissue ischemia triggers a cascade of events that results in the development of accessory vasculature to increase local tissue perfusion and to salvage tissue. However, this adaptive mechanism of repair is suboptimal in some patients. Therapeutic angiogenesis aims to stimulate new blood vessel formation via the local administration of proangiogenic agents or cell therapy products (CTPs). In this review, we provide a summary of the current understanding of in vitro models for assessing the angiogenic potential of a product.

Current Phase II drugs under investigation for the treatment of limb ischemia

INTRODUCTION

More than 20 million people in Europe suffer from peripheral arterial disease and nearly 3% develop critical limb ischemia (CLI). Without any medical treatment, CLI has poor prognosis, resulting in limb loss and high mortality rate. Until today, no systemic drug is available for the treatment of CLI and the gold standard method of treatment includes risk factor modification and open surgical or endovascular revascularization. Endovascular local drug delivery devices and novel antithrombotic agents, currently under investigation, aim to improve outcomes of revascularization procedures. The pioneering concept of therapeutic angiogenesis induced by gene and stem cell therapy has been proposed, in an attempt to increase ischemic tissue perfusion.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes local and systemic pharmacological treatment of CLI using endovascular or pharmaco-biological therapy and focuses on Phase II trials available for these drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

Novel endovascular technologies combining angioplasty and local drug-delivery continuously improve and will come to be standard of practice for the management of limb ischemia, while new antithrombotic agents will further improve outcomes. Therapeutic angiogenesis represents a safe and promising treatment option. The combination of revascularization with microcirculation improvement induced by gene or stem cell therapy could enhance limb salvage.