Neoadjuvant cisplatin and radical cesarean hysterectomy for cervical cancer in pregnancy

Cervical cancer in pregnancy

Cervical cancer is one of the most common and challenging malignancies diagnosed during pregnancy, requiring a complex balance between effective oncological management and pregnancy preservation. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence and clinical experience regarding the management of cervical cancer in pregnant patients. While treatment should generally follow standard protocols for nonpregnant patients, emerging data suggest that pregnancy can often be safely maintained without compromising oncological outcomes. Nevertheless, robust prognostic data from larger patient cohorts are still needed. Individualized treatment approaches that incorporate the patient's preferences and values are crucial. Given the complexities involved, referral to specialized tertiary centers with expertise in the oncological and obstetric care of pregnant cancer patients is strongly recommended to ensure optimal outcomes for both mother and child.

Cervical Cancer Associated with Pregnancy: Current Challenges and Future Strategies

Cancer during pregnancy is defined as a tumor diagnosed in a pregnant woman or up to 1-year post-partum. While being a rare disease, cervical cancer is probably one of the most challenging medical conditions, with the dual stake of treating the cancer without compromising its chances for cure, while preserving the pregnancy and the health of the fetus and child. To date, guidelines for gynecological cancers are provided through international consensus meetings with expert panels, giving insights on both diagnosis, treatment, and obstetrical care. However, these expert guidelines do not discuss the various approaches than can be found within the literature, such as alternative staging modalities or innovative surgical approaches. Also, the obstetrical care of women diagnosed with cervical cancer during pregnancy requires specific considerations that are not provided within our current standard of care. This systematic review aims to fill the gap on current issues with regards to the management of cervical cancer during pregnancy and provide future directions within this evolving landscape.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus cisplatin before radical surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer during pregnancy: A case series and literature review

RATIONALE

Despite the development of human papillomavirus vaccines and significant improvement in cervical cancer screening over the past few years, cervical cancer remains the fourth most common cancer in women of childbearing age after breast cancer, melanoma, and thyroid cancer.

PATIENT CONCERNS

In this case report, the patients are all cervical cancer with stage IB2 and IB3 during pregnancy, the management constitutes a major medical challenge related to the impact of treatment on both maternal and fetal outcomes. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is an innovative option for cervical cancer patients with stage IB2 and IB3 before cesarean delivery and radical hysterectomy, and many chemotherapeutic agents are available, cisplatin plus paclitaxel yielded good maternal and fetal outcomes to the authors' knowledge.

DIAGNOSES

Masses were discovered in the cervix of 4 pregnant women with a history of vaginal bleeding. Biopsy examination of the masses revealed cervical carcinoma, which was staged in accordance with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (i.e., FIGO) system.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were treated with paclitaxel plus cisplatin, followed by cesarean delivery and radical hysterectomy.

OUTCOMES

The 4 patients were treated successfully, with no recurrence during follow-up periods of 14 to 56 months, and all of the children were doing well with no anomalies.

LESSONS

Although further data are required, in pregnant women with invasive cervical cancer, NACT with cisplatin plus paclitaxel followed by cesarean delivery and radical hysterectomy was a practical treatment option.

British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS) cervical cancer guidelines: Recommendations for practice

Cervix cancer in many countries is declining and screening programmes and immunisation will reduce the incidence in the next few decades. This guideline attempts to cover management of invasive disease reflecting diagnosis and imaging including new imaging and sentinel lymph node biopsies. Smaller volume disease is usually managed surgically whereas advanced disease is treated with (chemo)- radiation. It also includes discussion of fertility sparing procedures. Practices are changing frequently for all aspects of care usually in attempts to reduce complications and improve quality of life. The management of advanced disease is treated by chemotherapy and the use of newer agents is also discussed. Other sections discuss specialist situations such as cancer in pregnancy, rare cervical tumours, late effects and supportive measures and fertility preserving approaches.

Surgical errors and complications following cesarean delivery in the United States

BACKGROUND

Cesarean delivery is the most common inpatient surgery performed internationally. Although cesarean delivery is typically performed to prevent adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, there is still a risk of surgical errors and complications. This study examined maternal and hospital risk factors associated with errors and complications following cesarean delivery in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of, and associated individual- and hospital-level risk factors for, surgical errors and complications following cesarean delivery in the United States.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were obtained from the 2012-2014 National Inpatient Sample. Surgical errors (eg,. foreign body retained during surgery, anesthetic error) can be the result of human error, whereas complications (eg, mortality, postpartum hemorrhage) can be due to external factors such as pre-existing comorbidities. The overall prevalence of surgical errors and complications in cesarean delivery was calculated. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to examine the association between individual and hospital characteristics and surgical errors/complications.

RESULTS

Among 648,584 cesarean delivery hospitalizations, 1.98% (95% confidence interval, 1.95-2.01%) and 8.43% (95% confidence interval, 8.40-8.46%) of women had an error or complication, respectively. The most common errors were anesthetic errors, errors involving blood vessels, and errors involving the bladder. The most common complications were postpartum hemorrhage, infection, and hysterectomy. Both individual- and hospital-level factors were associated with errors and complications. Women with Medicaid insurance had increased odds of errors (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-1.43) but lower odds of complications (odds ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.90) compared to women with private insurance. Compared to non-Hispanic white women, women of all races had lower odds of error, and only non-Hispanic black women had greater odds of complications (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.16). Similarly, rural hospitals had lower odds of surgical errors (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.62) and complications (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.62), whereas hospitals with a large bed number had greater odds of errors and complications than medium-bed size hospitals, at 1.13 (95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.17), and 1.13 (95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.15), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study identified specific risk factors for errors and complications that can be further examined through quality improvement frameworks to reduce the prevalence of adverse maternal events during cesarean delivery.

Treatment and clinical outcomes of cervical cancer during pregnancy

Background

This study aims to investigate clinicopathological factors associated with survival rate and treatment of patients with cervical cancer during pregnancy (CCP).

Methods

A total of 92 patients diagnosed CCP were retrospectively reviewed. One patient was from Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, 5 patients were from Tongji Hospital, and 86 patients were from case reports in the PubMed database from 1961 to 2019. Patients and tumor characteristics were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used to analyze the 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS).

Results

Most patients (73 cases) were stage I according to the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) standards. Twelve patients (13.04%) terminated pregnancy once diagnosed. These patients were diagnosed at the mean gestational age (GA) of 11±3 weeks, during early pregnancy. For the rest of the patients (80 cases) who continued pregnancy, the mean GA was 35±2 weeks at delivery. There was a significant difference in survival whether the treatment was performed once diagnosed or not. The 5-year DSS was 75% in adenocarcinoma (AC), 68.5% in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and 43.7% in the rare subtype. Among the 38 patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), one patient suffered from spontaneous abortion, and one baby experienced acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ex-FAB (French-American-British)-M7 subtype and received bone marrow transplantation. Other delivered newborns showed no abnormality or malformation. Cox multi-factorial analysis demonstrated that tumor size (2 cm) was an independent overall survival predictor for CCP patients (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Tumor size was an independent prognostic factor of survival in CCP patients. Pregnancy has adverse effects on the prognosis of cervical cancer. Personalized treatment is a priority for CCP patients.

Efficacy of neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy during the second and third trimester of pregnancy in women with cervical cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy during pregnancy in women with cervical cancer.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were fully searched to find eligible studies regarding platinum use during pregnancy in women with cervical cancer from January 1980 to September 2018. Data were extracted from the selected studies independently by two authors. Descriptive statistics were calculated for categorical data (frequency and percentage) and numeration data (mean and SD for normally distributed data and median and range for abnormally distributed data). Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and log-rank tests to estimate overall survival and progression-free survival for all patients.

Results

A total of 39 studies including 88 cervical cancer patients with platinum administration during pregnancy were selected in this meta-analysis, and 64 women provided International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage information. Among the latter, 56 of 64 (87.5%) were diagnosed with early stages (I and IIA) and the remaining 8 of 64 (12.5%) had advanced stages (IIB, III, and IV). In relation to cisplatin, 86 pregnant women were identified, whereas only 2 pregnant women with carboplatin application were retrieved. Overall, 88 newborns were delivered from 84 pregnancies, including two sets of twins and one set of triplets, among which 71 neonates (71 of 88, 80.7%) were completely healthy at birth. All children were healthy at the end of follow-up (median 17 months, range 0–149.5 months), except one who was diagnosed with retroperitoneal embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma at 5 years old and one who had acute myeloid leukemia at 22 months of age. At the end of follow-up (range 4.75–156 months), 16 of 81 (19.8%) patients were diagnosed with recurrence of cervical cancer, and 11 (90%) of those died because of cancer relapse. Neither median overall survival nor median progression-free survival were reached.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrated that neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy could be a favorable choice for the management of patients with cervical cancer during the second and third trimesters. To reduce the side effects of chemotherapy, cisplatin might be good to use as monotherapy in these patients.

Management of gynecological cancer in pregnant patients

INTRODUCTION

Cancer during pregnancy is a rare but challenging condition. More women delay childbearing and consequently the incidence of cancer during pregnancy is constantly increasing.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

An extensive electronic search was performed in PubMed and Scopus. Only studies written after 1985 were considered eligible for this review. Abstracts, conference papers, book chapters, animal studies, commentaries as well as editorials articles were excluded from this review.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Cancer treatment during pregnancy is possible, but both maternal and fetal conditions need to be preserved. Randomized clinical trials are not feasible and current evidence are mainly based on case-series, small case reports and expert opinion. Cervical and ovarian cancers are the most common gynecological cancers diagnosed during pregnancy. Surgery and chemotherapy after the first trimester seem to be relatively safe for the newborn. Platinum-based chemotherapy administered during the 2nd-3rd trimester showed comparable adverse effects in newborns to those in the general population. Babies exposed to antenatal chemotherapy might be more likely to develop small for gestational age and NICU admission, than babies not exposed.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of pregnant women with cancer should be performed in specialized cancer centers and all cases should be discussed with a multidisciplinary approach. In the present review, we discuss the current recommendations for the management of pregnancies complicated by cancer and neonatal outcomes.

Cancer in Pregnancy

This article reviews some of the more common types of cancer that may be encountered during pregnancy. It reviews the unique challenges with the diagnosis and treatment of breast, cervical, hematologic, and colon cancers in pregnant patients.

Locally advanced cervical cancer complicating pregnancy: A case of competing risks from the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Rome

A case of stage IB2 cervical cancer at 27 weeks of pregnancy, treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical Cesarean hysterectomy with full pelvic and infra-mesenteric lymphadenectomy, and adjuvant chemo-radiation is described. While she remains without disease, her baby was diagnosed with acute myelogenous leukemia. We highlight the pre-operative work-up, treatment options, safety, feasibility, and outcomes for the mother and her fetus.

Management of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in Pregnancy: A Case Report

Background

Carcinoma of the cervix is the most common malignancy associated with pregnancy. In the first and second trimesters patients should receive the same treatment as is used in nonpregnant women and termination is advised. In selected cases neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) could be proposed but only a few cases have been reported.

Case

A 27-year-old woman, gravida 1 para 0, at 15 weeks' gestation, was diagnosed with FIGO stage IB2 squamous cervical cancer. After refusing to terminate pregnancy, she was treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin) starting at 18 weeks. A cesarean section with radical surgery was performed at 32 weeks and a healthy baby delivered. Four weeks later the patient started chemoradiation therapy. She relapsed 1 year after surgery and died when her child was 2 years old.

Conclusion

NACT followed by radical surgery was an unsuccessful treatment in our patient; platinum-based chemotherapy was harmless to the child up to the last follow-up.

Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in Pregnancy: Overcoming the Challenge. A Case Series and Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

Cervical cancer is the most common gynecological cancer occurring in pregnancy, creating a complex situation both for patient and physician. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an innovative way of managing cervical cancer in pregnancy.

METHODS

In our paper, we report a retrospective case series of 4 women treated with chemotherapy for invasive cervical cancer during pregnancy in our center over the last 5 years, and we summarize the available literature and guidelines.

RESULTS

All the cases were locally advanced cervical cancers that received chemotherapy with platinum and/or taxanes. All patients showed a good response to chemotherapy and a radical surgery was performed with no additional morbidities at the cesarean delivery time in 3 of 4 cases. Three of 4 patients are alive and have a good outcome with no recurrence of disease up to date. One patient died because of recurrent disease 2 years after the first-line treatment during pregnancy. All babies are alive and well up to date (maximum follow-up, 63 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Even if there are no standardized practices in the treatment of cervical cancer in pregnancy, in our opinion, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be a very useful strategy for patients and physicians facing the challenge.

Individual management of cervical cancer in pregnancy

Purpose

The management of cervical cancer in pregnancy persists to be challenging. Therefore, identification of factors that influence the choice of therapeutic management is pivotal for an adequate patient counseling.

Methods

We present a literature review of 26 studies reporting 121 pregnancies affected by cervical cancer. Additionally, we add a retrospective case series of five patients with pregnancy-associated cervical cancer diagnosed and treated in our clinic between 2006 and 2013.

Results

The literature review revealed that the therapeutic management during pregnancy varies according to the gestational age at diagnosis, while in the postpartum period no influence on the treatment choice could be detected. Also in our case series the choice of oncologic therapy was influenced by the gestational age, the wish to continue the pregnancy and the risks of delaying definitive treatment.

Conclusions

There are no standardized procedures concerning the treatment of cervical cancer in pregnancy. Therefore, in consultation with the patient and a multidisciplinary team, an adequate individualized treatment plan should be determined.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00404-015-3980-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Management of cervical cancer during pregnancy

Cervical cancer (CC) is the most common gynaecological cancer during pregnancy. The rarity of the disease and lack of randomised control studies have prevented the establishment of treatment guidelines. The management of CC mainly follows the guidelines for the non-pregnant disease state, expert opinions and limited case reports. Although the management of CC diagnosed during pregnancy appears to be a significant dilemma for the patients and specialists, the prognosis of CC is not influenced by pregnancy. The treatment decision should be made collaboratively with a multidisciplinary team consisting of an obstetrician, gynaecologist, oncologist and paediatrician. The concerns of the patient should be taken into account.

Neoadjuvant and postoperative chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus cisplatin for the treatment of FIGO stage IB cervical cancer in pregnancy

Cervical cancer is one of the most common malignancy diagnosed during pregnancy. The experience of the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with paclitaxel plus cisplatin during pregnancy is limited. Three pregnant women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB cervical cancer received NACT with paclitaxel plus cisplatin until fetal lung maturity, and then underwent cesarean delivery and radical hysterectomy. Two of our patients had intermediate pathologic risk factors, and received adjuvant chemotherapy with the same regimen used in NACT. All patients did not have any evidence of disease recurrence for follow-up of 3, 4, and 8 years, respectively. NACT with paclitaxel plus cisplatin followed by radical hysterectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy could be considered as one of feasible alternatives to primary radical surgery or concurrent chemoradiation therapy with the termination of pregnancy in pregnant women with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer who have two or more intermediate pathologic-risk factors.

Cancer treatment in pregnant women

In general, strategies for the treatment of cancer in pregnancy should not differ significantly from the treatment regimens in non-pregnant women. However, this is difficult due to either the effects of anticancer drugs on the developing foetus or the possibility of long-term complications after the exposure to drugs and radiation. The decision about the introduction and continuation of treatment in the event of pregnancy should be preceded by a detailed analysis of the potential benefits and risks. There are no data to suggest that pregnancy termination alters the biological behaviour of the tumour or patient prognosis in the presence of appropriate antineoplastic therapy. All patients should be given appropriate advice and informed that there are insufficient scientific data to determine any generally accepted consensus. It is very important to always respect the will of the patient, and the moral judgment of the physician should have no impact on the decisions taken by the woman. If the woman decides to undergo active treatment and maintain her pregnancy, it is necessary to carry out consultations with experts in the field appropriate to the type of cancer. This paper presents a basic review of the literature on the targeted therapies currently used in selected cancers diagnosed during pregnancy: breast cancer, cervical cancer, Hodgkin's disease, melanoma, thyroid cancer, ovarian cancer, and colorectal cancer.

Cervical Carcinoma in Early Pregnancy - Successful Birth by Caesarean Section Followed by Radical Hysterectomy

A cervical carcinoma was diagnosed in a 32-year-old patient in the 17th week of her pregnancy. The histological confirmation revealed a well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. It was a clinical stage Ib1 tumour, without enlarged lymph nodes according to the image. After a staging MRI, intensive education of the patient and case discussion at the interdisciplinary tumour board as well as consultation with the neonatologist, it was agreed to prolong the pregnancy under close monitoring. The carcinoma was confined to the cervix in the further course of the pregnancy. The elective delivery was planned after 32 weeks of gestation. The primary Caesarean section followed by radical hysterectomy Piver II were carried out without complications. After regular postoperative progression of the mother, brachytherapy was performed at the appropriate time. The premature newborn was under neonatal care and exhibited good postnatal adaptation. Mother and child were discharged in good health.

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for cervical cancer in pregnancy: a case report and literature review

Managing women who are pregnant and with a diagnosis of cervical cancer has many complex challenges. This case report describes the diagnosis and management of a patient presenting in her first trimester with stage 2B cervical cancer. In conjunction with this a literature review was undertaken using the following databases from the years 1970-2010: Embase, CINAHL, Medline and DARE. We examined the number of cases reported in the literature in which chemotherapy also was used in pregnant women with a cervical malignancy. Twenty-four papers were retrieved describing in total (including the present case) 35 cases of cervical cancer in pregnancy treated with this modality. Cisplatin therapy would seem the most reliable form of treatment, permitting a good outcome for most patients. The effect of delaying radiotherapy to permit pregnancy to fetal viability in larger tumours cannot be elucidated.

Gynecologic malignancy in pregnancy

Gynecologic malignancy during pregnancy is a stressful problem. For the diagnosis and treatment of malignancy during pregnancy, a multidisciplinary approach is needed. Patients should be advised about the benefits and risk of treatment. When selecting a treatment for malignancy during pregnancy, the physiologic changes that occur with the pregnancy should be considered. Various diagnostic procedures that do not harm the fetus can be used. Laparoscopic surgery or laparotomy may be safely performed. The staging approach and treatment should be standard. Systemic chemotherapy during the first trimester should be delayed if possible. Radiation therapy should preferably start postpartum. Although delivery should be delayed preferably until after 35 weeks of gestation, termination of pregnancy may be considered when immediate treatment is required. Subsequent pregnancies do not increase the risk of malignancy recurrence.

Cervical cancer in pregnant women: treat, wait or interrupt? Assessment of current clinical guidelines, innovations and controversies

Cervical cancer during pregnancy is relatively uncommon. However, the incidence is expected to increase as more women delay childbearing. When preservation of the pregnancy is desired, optimal treatment is a major challenge to all. Whereas delay of treatment is an option for pre-invasive disease, and also small invasive carcinomas without lymph node involvement, management of tumours >2 cm remains experimental. Type of treatment needs to be individualized and depends mainly on gestational age, disease stage, and histology. Extensive counselling regarding the maternal and foetal risks is required. In this current review, we aim to summarize available data and treatment guidelines concerning cervical cancer in pregnancy. Controversies and research priorities are also identified.

Cervical cancer in pregnancy: 3 cases, 3 different approaches

OBJECTIVE

Cervical cancer is one of the most common malignancies in pregnancy and one percent of women diagnosed with cervical cancer are pregnant or postpartum at the time of the diagnosis. We discuss how pregnancy will affect the management of cancer, and cancer will affect the management of the pregnancy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Three case reports.

RESULTS

We report three cases, with three different approaches of pregnant patient with cervical carcinoma stage IB1, diagnosed below-20 weeks gestation. In two cases, the patients decided to continue the pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical cancer in pregnancy is a clinical challenge. Once the diagnosis, the stage and the extent of invasive cervical cancer have been established, a multidisciplinary approach is required. Decisions regarding timing of treatment and delivery require careful considerations, as well as the trimester in which the diagnosis is made. Delaying definitive treatment to improve fetal outcome, may carry an additional risk of tumor progression, although a delay in definitive treatment is regarded as feasible. Delayed treatment is safe in patients with small sized, early stage disease, if there is no evidence of disease progression. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy during pregnancy is still controversial. Cesarean delivery followed by radical hysterectomy is recommended. The effect of cervical cancer on pregnancy outcome is still not clear.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Cesarean Radical Hysterectomy in a Triplet Pregnancy Complicated by Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix: A Case Presentation and Literature Review

Objective

To report a triplet pregnancy complicated by clear cell cervical carcinoma that was managed using neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by caesarean radical hysterectomy.

Patient History

A 26-year-old woman had a diagnosis of cervical clear cell carcinoma, which was International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB1, at 18 weeks of gestation during a triplet pregnancy. Owing to the patient’s strong desire for full-term pregnancy, 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered after magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the tumor. The patient underwent cesarean delivery and radical hysterectomy at gestational week 32. The hysterectomy specimen revealed stage IB1 clear cell adenocarcinoma of the cervix. The neonates and the mother did not have any complications related to the treatment during 36 months of follow-up.

Conclusion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a triplet pregnancy complicated by cervical clear cell carcinoma that was successfully treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cesarean radical hysterectomy. Our experience and literature review suggest that neoadjuvant chemotherapy for cervical carcinoma diagnosed during pregnancy is associated with excellent oncologic and fetal outcome; therefore, it may be considered as a temporary fertility-sparing approach in selected patients with a strong desire for full-term pregnancy. Nonetheless, additional research and long-term follow-up are needed to reach a more definitive conclusion.

Gynaecological cancers in pregnancy

Cervical and ovarian cancers are the most common gynaecological cancers diagnosed during pregnancy. In early-stage cervical cancer during the first and at the beginning of the second trimester, the two main considerations for management of the patient are the tumour size (and stage) and nodal staging. MRI and laparoscopic lymphadenectomy are useful for clinicians planning a potentially conservative approach. The management of patients with locally advanced cervical disease is controversial and should be discussed on a case-by-case basis according to the tumour size, radiological findings, the term of pregnancy, and the patient's wishes. Different histological types of malignant ovarian diseases arise during pregnancy and their management depends on the diagnosis (histological subtypes, tumour differentiation, and nodal status), the tumour stage, and the trimester of the pregnancy. In patients with peritoneal spread or high-risk early-stage disease, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pregnancy preservation could be appropriate.

[Management of pregnant women with advanced cervical cancer: About five cases observed in Lille from 2002 till 2009. Evaluation of practices referring to the new French recommendations of 2008]

PURPOSE

An update on the management of invasive cervical cancer (from stage IB) diagnosed during pregnancy with reference to the recent French guidelines.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients for whom invasive cervical cancer was diagnosed during pregnancy and managed jointly by Jeanne-de-Flandres and Roubaix maternity and by Oscar-Lambret cancer center between 2002 and 2009.

RESULTS

Five patients were included: four stage IB1, and one stage IB2. Five pregnancies resulted in the birth of six alive children. Three patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy during pregnancy. One patient had a laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in first trimester. Two laparoscopic extraperitoneal paraortic lymphadenectomy have been made. The mean time of survey is 47.5 months (12-94 months). One patient died of her cancer.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of cervical cancer during pregnancy involves the same therapeutic guidelines in the absence of pregnancy. The laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy (up to 20 to 24 weeks of gestation) is crucial in the therapeutic treatment for tumors less than 4cm. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used during pregnancy for patients refusing medical termination of pregnancy.

Addressing concerns about cisplatin application during pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

Cervical cancer in second trimester of pregnancy is an oncologic challenge. Cisplatin is recommended to prevent cancer progression. This is a series correlating in vivo cisplatin concentration in the fetomaternal compartment and in breast milk with child development.

METHODS

Eight consecutive patients with cervical cancer diagnosed during the second trimester underwent conization/biopsy and/or pelvic laparoscopic lymphadenectomy (LAE). Delay of pregnancy in combination with neoadjuvant monochemotherapy was performed. After 2-4 cycles of cisplatin monochemotherapy cesarean section followed by radical hysterectomy was performed above 31 weeks of gestation. Synchronous samples from maternal blood, umbilical cord blood, and amniotic fluid were taken and analyzed. A probe of breast milk was taken from three patients. Pediatric aftercare was done every three months postpartum.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic LAE was uncomplicated in all patients. In seven out of eight patients lymph nodes were tumor free. Nine healthy babies were delivered. Pediatric follow-up showed normal development. Cisplatin concentrations in the umbilical cord and amniotic fluid were 31-65% and 13-42% of the amount in maternal blood, respectively. In breast milk, cisplatin was detectable in 1-10% of maternal blood concentration.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of significant lower cisplatin concentrations in fetal compartment and normal child growth provides additional security to apply cisplatin in pregnancy. Breastfeeding cannot be recommended.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus platinum followed by radical surgery in early cervical cancer during pregnancy: three case reports

To date, only seven women with Stage Ib1 to IIb cervical cancer during pregnancy treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery have been reported. We describe three cases of pregnant women with Stage Ib1 to IIa cervical cancer who were treated with paclitaxel plus platinum neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery. The first patient had a Stage Ib1 small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix, the second had a Stage IIa, 8 cm squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix and the third had a Stage Ib2 squamous cell carcinoma and positive lymph nodes. The three patients and their newborns were followed up. All patients had a partial or complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Two of these patients developed recurrences and one died due to progressive disease at 49 months. All neonates were healthy and had no abnormalities. In conclusion, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and platinum followed by radical surgery may be an option for pregnant women with invasive cervical cancer.

Can we diagnose invasive cervical cancer during pregnancy as precise as in nonpregnant women?: maternal and perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated with cervical cancers

Cervical cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy associated with pregnancy. However, there are no consensus guidelines that define the indications for or the optimal length of expectant management. The subjects were women who had a preexisting invasive cervical cancer or whose cancers were diagnosed during pregnancy or within 12 months after delivery. Thirty-nine consecutive women with cervical cancer, whose ages ranged from 20 to 40 years, were chosen as controls. We performed a retrospective chart review on the maternal profile and perinatal outcome and compared the clinical features between pregnancy- and non-pregnancy-associated cervical cancer in patients. The percentage of asymptomatic cases in which cancer was detected in a routine Papanicolaou test was significantly higher in the pregnant patients. The percentage of induced preterm labor or therapeutic abortions was 50%. Expectant management (mean length, 19.8 weeks) was chosen by 5 patients, and there were no cases of recurrence or death from disease. Seven subjects, including 5 patients whose diagnoses were changed from cervical intraepithelial neoplasm or condyloma to cancer, were managed as "unexpected expectant" because these subjects were not diagnosed as having stage IA/IB cancer during pregnancy. All of these subjects underwent vaginal delivery and included 2 patients with death from disease and lymph node recurrence. The percentage in which disease severity was underestimated was higher in pregnant patients. The option of therapeutic delay should be carefully discussed. Patient counseling should address the issue that risk may not be precisely estimated because of the possibility that disease severity may be underestimated during pregnancy.

Treatment of the pregnant mother with cancer: a systematic review on the use of cytotoxic, endocrine, targeted agents and immunotherapy during pregnancy. Part I: Solid tumors

The association of cancer and pregnancy is increasingly encountered nowadays in clinical practice. Due to the relative rarity of the situation, it lacks a systematized approach. Different systemic therapies are used in managing cancer with uncertainty regarding the potential hazards they could pose on the pregnancy and/or the fetus. We have performed a systematic review of literature to identify all reports addressing cancer patients who were exposed to any of the known systemic therapies during the course of the pregnancy. The results were discussed in two parts; part I addresses pregnant patients with solid tumors while part I for those with hematological malignancies. In part I, we identified different solid tumors diagnosed and treated during the course of pregnancy. Breast cancer was the most commonly treated followed by ovarian cancer. Other tumors were treated as well including lung cancer, cervical cancer, sarcoma and melanomas. It is important to acknowledge the intent of therapy (palliative vs. curative) and the patients has to be properly counseled to reach an informed decision. We aim to provide a more robust consensus on how to approach these cases and provide a higher degree of evidence to support the safety of applying certain management strategies over the other.

Diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer during pregnancy

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

One third of all cervical carcinomas occur during the reproductive period. Cervical carcinoma is the second greatest cause of death due to cancer during this phase. The estimated frequency of cervical cancer during pregnancy is one case for every 1,000 to 5,000 pregnancies. The aim here was to provide information about the difficulties in diagnosing and managing cervical neoplasia during pregnancy.

MATERIALS

A systematic review of the literature was undertaken through the PubMed, Cochrane, Excerpta Medica (Embase), Literatura Latino Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (Lilacs) and Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) databases, using the following words: pregnancy, cervical cancer, diagnosis and management.

RESULTS

There was a consensus in the literature regarding diagnosis of cervical carcinoma and management of preneoplastic lesions during pregnancy. However, for management of invasive carcinoma, there was great divergence regarding the gestational age taken as the limit for observation rather than immediate treatment.

CONCLUSION

All patients with cytological abnormalities should undergo colposcopy, which will indicate and guide biopsy. Conization is reserved for patients with suspected invasion. High-grade lesions should be monitored during pregnancy and reevaluated after delivery. In cases of invasive carcinoma detected up to the 12th week of pregnancy, patient treatment is prioritized. Regarding diagnoses made during the second trimester, fetal pulmonary maturity can be awaited, and the use of chemotherapy to stabilize the disease until the time of delivery appears to be viable.

French Recommendations on the Management of Invasive Cervical Cancer During Pregnancy

Background:

Cervical cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers during pregnancy, but the management of such cases remains unclear. A Working Group was set up in 2007 in France to propose national recommendations for the management of pregnant patients with invasive cervical carcinoma.

Methods:

The recommendations are based on this literature review conducted by the members of the Working Group.

Results:

Management of cervical cancer during pregnancy depends on 5 factors: stage of the disease (and the tumor size), nodal status, histological subtype of the tumor, term of the pregnancy, and whether the patient wishes to continue her pregnancy. In patients with early-stage disease diagnosed during the first 2 trimesters of pregnancy, there is an increasing tendency to preserve the pregnancy while awaiting fetal maturity in patients with absence of nodal involvement. The delivery (when the fetal maturity is attained) should be then performed using a cesarean section.

Conclusions:

This article proposes recommendations for the management of pregnant patients with invasive cervical cancer. These recommendations have been validated by the 3 main scientific societies of gynecologic oncology, pelvic surgery, and obstetrics and gynecology in France.