Gamete-specific methylation correlates with imprinting of the murine Xist gene

Roles of endogenous retroviral elements in the establishment and maintenance of imprinted gene expression

DNA methylation (DNAme) has long been recognized as a host defense mechanism, both in the restriction modification systems of prokaryotes as well as in the transcriptional silencing of repetitive elements in mammals. When DNAme was shown to be implicated as a key epigenetic mechanism in the regulation of imprinted genes in mammals, a parallel with host defense mechanisms was drawn, suggesting perhaps a common evolutionary origin. Here we review recent work related to this hypothesis on two different aspects of the developmental imprinting cycle in mammals that has revealed unexpected roles for long terminal repeat (LTR) retroelements in imprinting, both canonical and noncanonical. These two different forms of genomic imprinting depend on different epigenetic marks inherited from the mature gametes, DNAme and histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3), respectively. DNAme establishment in the maternal germline is guided by transcription during oocyte growth. Specific families of LTRs, evading silencing mechanisms, have been implicated in this process for specific imprinted genes. In noncanonical imprinting, maternally inherited histone marks play transient roles in transcriptional silencing during preimplantation development. These marks are ultimately translated into DNAme, notably over LTR elements, for the maintenance of silencing of the maternal alleles in the extraembryonic trophoblast lineage. Therefore, LTR retroelements play important roles in both establishment and maintenance of different epigenetic pathways leading to imprinted expression during development. Because such elements are mobile and highly polymorphic among different species, they can be coopted for the evolution of new species-specific imprinted genes.

DNA methylation and functional characterization of the XIST gene during in vitro early embryo development in cattle

XIST, in association with the shorter ncRNA RepA, are essential for the initiation of X chromosome inactivation (XCI) in mice. The molecular mechanisms controlling XIST and RepA expression are well characterized in that specie. However, little is known in livestock. We aimed to characterize the DNA methylation status along the 5' portion of XIST and to characterize its transcriptional profile during early development in cattle. Three genomic regions of XIST named here as promoter, RepA and DMR1 had their DNA methylation status characterized in gametes and embryos. Expression profile of XIST was evaluated, including sense and antisense transcription. Oocytes showed higher levels of methylation than spermatozoa that was demethylated. DMR1 was hypermethylated throughout oogenesis. At the 8-16-cell embryo stage DMR1 was completed demethylated. Interestingly, RepA gain methylation during oocyte maturation and was demethylated at the blastocyst stage, later than DMR1. These results suggest that DMR1 and RepA are transient differentially methylated regions in cattle. XIST RNA was detected in matured oocytes and in single cells from the 2-cell to the morula stage, confirming the presence of maternal and embryonic transcripts. Sense and antisense transcripts were detected along the XIST in blastocyst. In silico analysis identified 63 novel transcript candidates at bovine XIST locus from both the plus and minus strands. Taking together these results improve our understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in XCI initiation in cattle. This information may be useful for the improvement of assisted reproductive technologies in livestock considering that in vitro conditions may impair epigenetic reprogramming.

MBD2 and MBD3: elusive functions and mechanisms

Deoxyribonucleic acid methylation is a long known epigenetic mark involved in many biological processes and the 'readers' of this mark belong to several distinct protein families that 'read' and 'translate' the methylation mark into a function. Methyl-CpG binding domain proteins belong to one of these families that are associated with transcriptional activation/repression, regulation of chromatin structure, pluripotency, development, and differentiation. Discovered decades ago, the systematic determination of the genomic binding sites of these readers and their epigenome make-up at a genome-wide level revealed the tip of the functional iceberg. This review focuses on two members of the methyl binding proteins, namely MBD2 and MBD3 that reside in very similar complexes, yet appear to have very different biological roles. We provide a comprehensive comparison of their genome-wide binding features and emerging roles in gene regulation.

Genome-wide binding of MBD2 reveals strong preference for highly methylated loci

MBD2 is a subunit of the NuRD complex that is postulated to mediate gene repression via recruitment of the complex to methylated DNA. In this study we adopted an MBD2 tagging-approach to study its genome wide binding characteristics. We show that in vivo MBD2 is mainly recruited to CpG island promoters that are highly methylated. Interestingly, MBD2 binds around 1 kb downstream of the transcription start site of a subset of ∼ 400 CpG island promoters that are characterized by the presence of active histone marks, RNA polymerase II (Pol2) and low to medium gene expression levels and H3K36me3 deposition. These tagged-MBD2 binding sites in MCF-7 show increased methylation in a cohort of primary breast cancers but not in normal breast samples, suggesting a putative role for MBD2 in breast cancer.

X chromosome inactivation: a silence that needs to be broken

Each mammalian female cell transcriptionally inactivates one X chromosome to balance X-linked gene dosage between males and females. This phenomenon, called X chromosome inactivation, is a perfect epigenetic event, in which two chromosomes with identical DNA sequences are solely distinguished by epigenetic modifications. In this case, epigenetic marks, such as histone modifications, histone variants, DNA methylation, and ncRNAs, are all enriched on one chromosome, the inactive X chromosome (Xi), to establish its chromosome-wide gene silencing. At face value, it seems that the gene silencing mechanism of Xi is well understood. However, the "silence" of Xi in somatic cells is so tightly maintained that it remains largely intact even after almost all known epigenetic modifications are artificially depleted. To understand how the gene silence of Xi is maintained in soma is a major challenge in current research. We summarize the current knowledge related with this issue and discuss future research directions.

Regulation of X-chromosome inactivation by the X-inactivation centre

X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) ensures dosage compensation in mammals and is a paradigm for allele-specific gene expression on a chromosome-wide scale. Important insights have been made into the developmental dynamics of this process. Recent studies have identified several cis- and trans-acting factors that regulate the initiation of XCI via the X-inactivation centre. Such studies have shed light on the relationship between XCI and pluripotency. They have also revealed the existence of dosage-dependent activators that trigger XCI when more than one X chromosome is present, as well as possible mechanisms underlying the monoallelic regulation of this process. The recent discovery of the plasticity of the inactive state during early development, or during cloning, and induced pluripotency have also contributed to the X chromosome becoming a gold standard in reprogramming studies.

XCI in preimplantation mouse and human embryos: first there is remodelling…

Female eutherians silence one of their X chromosomes to accomplish an equal dose of X-linked gene expression compared with males. The mouse is the most widely used animal model in XCI research and has proven to be of great significance for understanding the complex mechanism of X-linked dosage compensation. Although the basic principles of XCI are similar in mouse and humans, differences exist in the timing of XCI initiation, the genetic elements involved in XCI regulation and the form of XCI in specific tissues. Therefore, the mouse has its limitations as a model to understand early human XCI and analysis of human tissues is required. In this review, we describe these differences with respect to initiation of XCI in human and mouse preimplantation embryos, the extra-embryonic tissues and the in vitro model of the epiblast: the embryonic stem cells.

The long noncoding RNA, Jpx, is a molecular switch for X chromosome inactivation

Once protein-coding, the X-inactivation center (Xic) is now dominated by large noncoding RNAs (ncRNA). X chromosome inactivation (XCI) equalizes gene expression between mammalian males and females by inactivating one X in female cells. XCI requires Xist, an ncRNA that coats the X and recruits Polycomb proteins. How Xist is controlled remains unclear but likely involves negative and positive regulators. For the active X, the antisense Tsix RNA is an established Xist repressor. For the inactive X, here, we identify Xic-encoded Jpx as an Xist activator. Jpx is developmentally regulated and accumulates during XCI. Deleting Jpx blocks XCI and is female lethal. Posttranscriptional Jpx knockdown recapitulates the knockout, and supplying Jpx in trans rescues lethality. Thus, Jpx is trans-acting and functions as ncRNA. Furthermore, ΔJpx is rescued by truncating Tsix, indicating an antagonistic relationship between the ncRNAs. We conclude that Xist is controlled by two RNA-based switches: Tsix for Xa and Jpx for Xi.

X chromosome dosage compensation: how mammals keep the balance

The development of genetic sex determination and cytologically distinct sex chromosomes leads to the potential problem of gene dosage imbalances between autosomes and sex chromosomes and also between males and females. To circumvent these imbalances, mammals have developed an elaborate system of dosage compensation that includes both upregulation and repression of the X chromosome. Recent advances have provided insights into the evolutionary history of how both the imprinted and random forms of X chromosome inactivation have come about. Furthermore, our understanding of the epigenetic switch at the X-inactivation center and the molecular aspects of chromosome-wide silencing has greatly improved recently. Here, we review various facets of the ever-expanding field of mammalian dosage compensation and discuss its evolutionary, developmental, and mechanistic components.

X-chromosome kiss and tell: how the Xs go their separate ways

Loci associated with noncoding RNAs have important roles in X-chromosome inactivation (XCI), the dosage compensation mechanism by which one of two X chromosomes in female cells becomes transcriptionally silenced. The Xs start out as epigenetically equivalent chromosomes, but XCI requires a cell to treat two identical X chromosomes in completely different ways: One X chromosome must remain transcriptionally active while the other becomes repressed. In the embryo of eutherian mammals, the choice to inactivate the maternal or paternal X chromosome is random. The fact that the Xs always adopt opposite fates hints at the existence of a trans-sensing mechanism to ensure the mutually exclusive silencing of one of the two Xs. This paper highlights recent evidence supporting a model for mutually exclusive choice that involves homologous chromosome pairing and the placement of asymmetric chromatin marks on the two Xs.

The dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during preimplantation development in mice

In the mouse, there are two forms of X chromosome inactivation (XCI), random XCI in the fetus and imprinted paternal XCI, which is limited to the extraembryonic tissues. While the mechanism of random XCI has been studied extensively using the in vitro XX ES cell differentiation system, imprinted XCI during early embryonic development has been less well characterized. Recent studies of early embryos have reported unexpected findings for the paternal X chromosome (Xp). Imprinted XCI may not be linked to meiotic silencing in the male germ line but rather to the imprinted status of the Xist gene. Furthermore, the Xp becomes inactivated in all cells of cleavage-stage embryos and then reactivated in the cells of the inner cell mass (ICM) that form the epiblast, where random XCI ensues.

Differential methylation of Xite and CTCF sites in Tsix mirrors the pattern of X-inactivation choice in mice

During mammalian dosage compensation, one of two X-chromosomes in female cells is inactivated. The choice of which X is silenced can be imprinted or stochastic. Although genetic loci influencing the choice decision have been identified, the primary marks for imprinting and random selection remain undefined. Here, we examined the role of DNA methylation, a mechanism known to regulate imprinting in autosomal loci, and sought to determine whether differential methylation on the two Xs might predict their fates. To identify differentially methylated domains (DMDs) at the X-inactivation center, we used bisulfite sequencing and methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme analyses. We found DMDs in Tsix and Xite, two genes previously shown to influence choice. Interestingly, the DMDs in Tsix lie within CTCF binding sites. Allelic methylation differences occur in gametes and are erased in embryonic stem cells carrying two active Xs. Because the pattern of DNA methylation mirrors events of X-inactivation, we propose that differential methylation of DMDs in Tsix and Xite constitute a primary mark for epigenetic regulation. The discovery of DMDs in CTCF sites draws further parallels between X-inactivation and autosomal imprinting.

The analysis of X-chromosome inactivation-related gene expression from single mouse embryo with sex-determination

Chromatin remodeling by histone and DNA modification is important for the initiation of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI). In this study, a thorough transcriptional analysis of five XCI-related genes was performed by single cell reverse-transcribed PCR. An analysis of the XCI-related gene (Xist, Tsix, SUV39H1, SET7, and DNMT1) expression was performed to investigate the initiation process of XCI from early mouse single embryo (1-cell, 2-cell, 4-cell, 8-cell, and blastocyst). Detection of the expression of Xist and Tsix from single 2-cell embryo was feasible, although the expression of those genes was very low in single 1-cell embryo. Transcription of those genes may be activated from single 2-cell embryo. After determining the sex of single embryo by Y-chromosome-specific Zfy expression, we found that Tsix could be detected from both male and female single embryos, but it was only possible to detect Xist from female single embryo. XCI chromatin-remodeling genes, such as histone H3 methylation enzymes (SUV39H1 and SET7) and DNA methylation enzyme (DNMT1), were expressed during all early phases of embryogenesis. The expression of those genes in single embryo was not dependent on sex. Our study illustrated that the expression of these chromatin-remodeling genes, SUV39H1, DNMT1, and SET7, may be originated from germ cells, which were not dependent on zygotic activation of Xist from female single embryo.

Imprinted X inactivation and reprogramming in the preimplantation mouse embryo

X chromosome inactivation is a developmentally regulated process that causes one of the two X chromosomes in normal female mammals to become transcriptionally silenced, thus equalizing the expression of X-linked genes between the sexes. Such dosage compensation depends upon dynamic genetic and epigenetic events occurring very early in development. X inactivation is controlled by an X inactivation centre that is associated with the expression of non-coding RNAs required for the silencing. Also associated with the inactive X are repressive histone modifications and polycomb protein-mediated states, which are progressively acquired during the inactivation process. In mouse, two forms of X inactivation have been described. Random X inactivation happens in the derivatives of the inner cell mass (ICM) giving rise to embryos where the maternally inherited X(Xm) is inactive in some cells and the paternally derived X (Xp) is inactive in others. Random X inactivation occurs around the time of implantation. Imprinted X inactivation, the preferential inactivation of the Xp chromosome, occurs earlier and, although there has been some debate as to the precise timing of initiation of this event, is apparent in all cells early in preimplantation development, then is subsequently confined to the cells of the extraembryonic lineages. A picture is emerging whereby initial epigenetic asymmetry between the two parental X chromosomes is reprogrammed in a lineage specific manner resulting in a switch from imprinted to random inactivation in embryonic derivatives. Neither the underlying reason nor the full extent of these early lineage specific epigenetic changes is known, but they may be correlated with more genome-wide reprogramming events essential for normal development.

Mouse Embryos and Chimera Cloned from Neural Cells in the Postnatal Cerebral Cortex

Cloning of mice has been achieved by transferring nuclei of various types of somatic cell nuclei into enucleated oocytes. However, all attempts to produce live cloned offspring using the nuclei of neurons from adult cerebral cortex have failed. Previously we obtained cloned mice using the nuclei of neural cells collected from fetal cerebral cortex. Here, we attempted to generate cloned mice using differentiated neurons from the cerebral cortex of postnatal (day 0-4) mice. Although we were unable to obtain live cloned pups, many fetuses reached day 10.5 days of development. These fetuses showed various abnormalities such as spherical omission of the neuroepithelium, collapsed lumen of neural tube, and aberrant expressions of marker proteins of neurons. We produced chimeric mice in which some hair cells and kidney cells were originated from differentiated neurons. In chimeric fetuses, LacZ-positive donor cells were in all three germ cell layers. However, chimeras with large contribution of donor-derived cells were not obtained. These results indicate that nuclei of differentiated neurons have lost their developmental totipotency. In other words, the conventional nuclear transfer technique does not allow nuclei of differentiated neurons to undergo complete genomic reprogramming required for normal embryonic development.

Monoallelic gene expression: a repertoire of recurrent themes

The development of mature B and T cells in the lymphoid system involves a series of molecular decisions that culminate in the expression of a single antigen receptor on the cell surface, a phenomenon termed allelic exclusion. While feedback inhibition of the recombinase-activation gene proteins evidently plays an important role in the maintenance of allelic exclusion, the initial restriction of rearrangement to only one allele in each cell seems to be achieved through monoallelic epigenetic changes. Epigenetic mechanisms involved in the establishment of allelic exclusion also play a central role in other types of monoallelic expression, including X-chromosome inactivation in female cells, and parental imprinting. In all three systems, the inequality of the two alleles seems to be achieved mainly by differential DNA methylation, asynchronous DNA replication, differential chromatin modifications, unequal nuclear localization, and non-coding RNA. In this review, we discuss the unifying features among these monoallelically expressed systems and the unique characteristics displayed by each of them.

DNA methylation in epigenetic control of gene expression

Over three decades ago DNA methylation had been suggested to play a role in the regulation of gene expression. This chapter reviews the development of this field of research over the last three decades, from the time when this idea was proposed up until now when the molecular mechanisms involved in the effect of DNA methylation on gene expression are becoming common knowledge. The dynamic changes that the DNA methylation pattern undergoes during gametogenesis and embryo development have now been revealed. The three-way connection between DNA methylation, chromatin structure and gene expression has been recently clarified and the interrelationships between DNA methylation and histone modification are currently under investigation. DNA methylation is implicated in developmental processes such as X-chromosome inactivation, genomic imprinting and disease, including tumor development. This chapter discusses all these issues in depth.

Chromatin modifications on the inactive X chromosome

In female mammals, one X chromosome is transcriptionally silenced to achieve dosage compensation between XX females and XY males. This process, known as X-inactivation, occurs early in development, such that one X chromosome is silenced in every cell. Once X-inactivation has occurred, the inactive X chromosome is marked by a unique set of epigenetic features that distinguishes it from the active X chromosome and autosomes. These modifications appear sequentially during the transition from a transcriptionally active to an inactive state and, once established, act redundantly to maintain transcriptional silencing. In this review, we survey the unique epigenetic features that characterize the inactive X chromosome, describe the mechanisms by which these marks are established and maintained, and discuss how each contributes to silencing the inactive X chromosome.

Xist RNA and the mechanism of X chromosome inactivation

Dosage compensation in mammals is achieved by the transcriptional inactivation of one X chromosome in female cells. From the time X chromosome inactivation was initially described, it was clear that several mechanisms must be precisely integrated to achieve correct regulation of this complex process. X-inactivation appears to be triggered upon differentiation, suggesting its regulation by developmental cues. Whereas any number of X chromosomes greater than one is silenced, only one X chromosome remains active. Silencing on the inactive X chromosome coincides with the acquisition of a multitude of chromatin modifications, resulting in the formation of extraordinarily stable facultative heterochromatin that is faithfully propagated through subsequent cell divisions. The integration of all these processes requires a region of the X chromosome known as the X-inactivation center, which contains the Xist gene and its cis-regulatory elements. Xist encodes an RNA molecule that plays critical roles in the choice of which X chromosome remains active, and in the initial spread and establishment of silencing on the inactive X chromosome. We are now on the threshold of discovering the factors that regulate and interact with Xist to control X-inactivation, and closer to an understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underlie this complex process.

Molecular links between X-inactivation and autosomal imprinting: X-inactivation as a driving force for the evolution of imprinting?

In classical Mendelian inheritance, each parent donates a set of chromosomes to its offspring so that maternally and paternally encoded information is expressed equally. The phenomena of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) and autosomal imprinting in mammals violate this dogma of genetic equality. In XCI, one of the two female X chromosomes is silenced to equalize X-linked gene dosage between XX and XY individuals. In genomic imprinting, parental marks determine which of the embryo's two autosomal alleles will be expressed. Although XCI and imprinting appear distinct, molecular evidence now shows that they share a surprising number of features. Among them are cis-acting control centers, long-distance regulation and differential DNA methylation. Perhaps one of the most intriguing similarities between XCI and imprinting has been their association with noncoding and antisense RNAs. Very recent data also suggest the common involvement of histone modifications and chromatin-associated factors such as CTCF. Collectively, the evidence suggests that XCI and genomic imprinting may have a common origin. Here, I hypothesize that the need for X-linked dosage compensation was a major driving force in the evolution of genomic imprinting in mammals. I propose that imprinting was first fixed on the X chromosome for XCI and subsequently acquired by autosomes.

Physiological functions of imprinted genes

Genomic imprinting in gametogenesis marks a subset of mammalian genes for parent-of-origin-dependent monoallelic expression in the offspring. Embryological and classical genetic experiments in mice that uncovered the existence of genomic imprinting nearly two decades ago produced abnormalities of growth or behavior, without severe developmental malformations. Since then, the identification and manipulation of individual imprinted genes has continued to suggest that the diverse products of these genes are largely devoted to controlling pre- and post-natal growth, as well as brain function and behavior. Here, we review this evidence, and link our discussion to a website (http://www.otago.ac.nz/IGC) containing a comprehensive database of imprinted genes. Ultimately, these data will answer the long-debated question of whether there is a coherent biological rationale for imprinting.

Limited demethylation leaves mosaic-type methylation states in cloned bovine pre-implantation embryos

Cloning by nuclear transfer (NT) has been riddled with difficulties: most clones die before birth and survivors frequently display growth abnormalities. The cross-species similarity in abnormalities observed in cloned fetuses/animals leads us to suspect the fidelity of epigenetic reprogramming of the donor genome. Here, we found that single-copy sequences, unlike satellite sequences, are demethylated in pre-implantation NT embryos. The differential demethylation pattern between genomic sequences was confirmed by analyzing single blastocysts. It suggests selective demethylation of other developmentally important genes in NT embryos. We also observed a reverse relationship between methylation levels and inner cell mass versus trophectoderm (ICM/TE) ratios, which was found to be a result of another type of differential demethylation occurring in NT blastocysts where unequal methylation was maintained between ICM and TE regions. TE-localized methylation aberrancy suggests a widespread gene dysregulation in an extra-embryonic region, thereby resulting in placental dysfunction familiar to cloned fetuses/animals. These differential demethylations among genomic sequences and between differently allocated cells produce varied overall, but specified, methylation patterns, demonstrating that epigenetic reprogramming occurs in a limited fashion in NT embryos.

Organization of the X and Y chromosomes in human, chimpanzee and mouse pachytene nuclei using molecular cytogenetics and three-dimensional confocal analyses

We used multicolour fluorescence in-situ hybridization on air-dried pachytene nuclei to analyse the structural and functional domains of the sex vesicle (SV) in human, chimpanzee and mouse. The same technology associated with 3-dimensional analysis was then performed on human and mouse pachytene nuclei from cytospin preparations and tissue cryosections. The human and the chimpanzee SVs were very similar, with a consistently small size and a high degree of condensation. The mouse SV was most often seen to be large and poorly condensed, although it did undergo progressive condensation during pachynema. These results suggest that the condensation of the sex chromosomes is not a prerequisite for the formation of the mouse SV, and that a different specific mechanism could be responsible for its formation. We also found that the X and Y chromosomes are organized into two separate and non-entangled chromatin domains in the SV of the three species. In each species, telomeres of the X and Y chromosomes remain clustered in a small area of the SV, even those without a pseudoautosomal region. The possible mechanisms involved in the organization of the sex chromosomes and in SV formation are discussed.

The causes and consequences of random and non-random X chromosome inactivation in humans

X chromosome (X) inactivation is a remarkable biological process including the choice and cis-limited inactivation of one X, as well as the stable maintenance of this silencing by epigenetic chromatin alterations. The process results in females generally being mosaic for two populations of cells--one with each parental X active. In this review, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of how inactivation works, as well as the causes and clinical implications of deviations from random inactivation.

The paternal methylation imprint of the mouse H19 locus is acquired in the gonocyte stage during foetal testis development

BACKGROUND

Germline-specific differential DNA methylation that persists through fertilization and embryonic development is thought to be the 'imprint' distinguishing the parental alleles of imprinted genes. If such methylation is to work as the imprinting mechanism, however, it has to be reprogrammed following each passage through the germline. Previous studies on maternally methylated genes have shown that their methylation imprints are first erased in primordial germ cells (PGCs) and then re-established during oocyte growth.

RESULTS

We have examined the timing of the reprogramming of the paternal methylation imprint of the mouse H19 gene during germ cell development. In both male and female PGCs, the paternal allele is partially methylated whereas the maternal allele is unmethylated. This partial methylation is completely erased in the female germline by entry into meiosis, establishing the oocyte methylation pattern. In the male germline, both alleles become methylated, mainly during the gonocyte stage, establishing the sperm methylation pattern.

CONCLUSION

The paternal methylation imprint of H19 is established in the male germline and erased in the female germline at specific developmental stages. The identification of the timings of the methylation and demethylation should help to identify and characterize the biochemical basis of the reprogramming of imprinting.

A new approach to immunological sexing of sperm

A non-invasive, immunological method for sexing mammalian sperm would be of benefit to agricultural industries. This paper presents a new approach, based on the hypothesis that sex-specific proteins (SSPs) are evolutionarily more highly conserved than non-SSPs. Antibodies to non-SSPs were raised and used in an affinity procedure to remove non-SSPs and enrich for SSPs. Thereafter, using column chromatography, purified SSPs were obtained. Sex-specific antibodies (SSAbs) raised against these SSPs appear to bind to sex-chromosome-specific proteins (SCSPs) on the sperm membrane and make possible a sperm-sexing procedure. Antibodies to SCSPs were raised and used to identify putative SCSPs by affinity chromatography. The preliminary results presented here suggest that a viable immunological sperm sexing procedure can be developed.

Epigenetic modification and imprinting of the mammalian genome during development

Genomic imprinting in mammals results in the differential expression of maternal and paternal alleles of certain genes. Recent observations have revealed that the regulation of imprinted genes is only partially determined by epigenetic modifications imposed on the two parental genomes during gametogenesis. Additional modifications mediated by factors in the ooplasm, early embryo, or developing embryonic tissues appear to be involved in establishing monoallelic expression for a majority of imprinted genes. As a result, genomic imprinting effects may be manifested in a stage-specific or cell type-specific manner. The developmental aspects of imprinting are reviewed here, and the available molecular data that address the mechanism of allele silencing for three specific imprinted gene domains are considered within the context of explaining how the imprinted gene silencing may be controlled developmentally.

Genetic conflicts in genomic imprinting

The expression pattern of genes in mammals and plants can depend upon the parent from which the gene was inherited, evidence for a mechanism of parent-specific genomic imprinting. Kinship considerations are likely to be important in the natural selection of many such genes, because coefficients of relatedness will usually differ between maternally and paternally derived genes. Three classes of gene are likely to be involved in genomic imprinting: the imprinted genes themselves, trans-acting genes in the parents, which affect the application of the imprint, and trnas-acting genes in the offspring, which recognize and affect the expression of the imprint. We show that coefficients of relatedness will typically differ among these three classes, thus engendering conflicts of interest between Imprinter genes, imprinted genes, and imprint-recognition genes, with probable consequences for the evolution of the imprinting machinery.

Bisulfite genomic sequencing-derived methylation profile of the xist gene throughout early mouse development

Differential epigenetic modification by methylation of CpG dinucleotides is a candidate mechanism that may identify the alleles of imprinted genes and result in monoallelic expression of either the maternal or the paternal allele. Determination of the allelic methylation status of imprinted genes in the gametes and during early development is constrained by the limiting quantities of genomic DNA available from these early developmental stages. To circumvent this problem we have used bisulfite genomic sequencing to determine the allelic methylation status of the minimal promoter and a 1-kb region within the Xist gene during preimplantation development. We find that the parental Xist alleles are not differentially methylated in these regions. Our findings are discussed in the context of previous conflicting data obtained using methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme digestion followed by PCR amplification to assay for methylation.

Developmentally regulated Xist promoter switch mediates initiation of X inactivation

Developmental regulation of the mouse Xist gene at the onset of X chromosome inactivation is mediated by RNA stabilization. Here, we show that alternate promoter usage gives rise to distinct stable and unstable RNA isoforms. Unstable Xist transcript initiates at a novel upstream promoter, whereas stable Xist RNA is transcribed from the previously identified promoter and from a novel downstream promoter. Analysis of cells undergoing X inactivation indicates that a developmentally regulated promoter switch mediates stabilization and accumulation of Xist RNA on the inactive X chromosome.

Imprinting mechanisms

A number of recent studies have provided new insights into mechanisms that regulate genomic imprinting in the mammalian genome. Regions of allele-specific differential methylation (DMRs) are present in all imprinted genes examined. Differential methylation is erased in germ cells at an early stage of their development, and germ-line-specific methylation imprints in DMRs are reestablished around the time of birth. After fertilization, differential methylation is retained in core DMRs despite genome-wide demethylation and de novo methylation during preimplantation and early postimplantation stages. Direct repeats near CG-rich DMRs may be involved in the establishment and maintenance of allele-specific methylation patterns. Imprinted genes tend to be clustered; one important component of clustering is enhancer competition, whereby promoters of linked imprinted genes compete for access to enhancers. Regional organization and spreading of the epigenotype during development is also important and depends on DMRs and imprinting centers. The mechanism of cis spreading of DNA methylation is not known, but precedent is provided by the Xist RNA, which results in X chromosome inactivation in cis. Reading of the somatic imprints could be carried out by transcription factors that are sensitive to methylation, or by methyl-cytosine-binding proteins that are involved in transcriptional repression through chromatin remodeling.

Variability of DNA methylation pattern in somatic and germ cells in male newt (Amphibia, Urodela) Triturus cristatus carnifex

In a survey of several mammalian genomes, namely humans, rodents and bovines, the differences in the 5-methylcytosine (m5C) content show that repeated DNA sequences from sperm were undermethylated and from various somatic tissues were heavily methylated. This report shows a pattern of methylation in male newt (Amphibia, Urodela) Triturus cristatus carnifex (T. c. c.) unlike that so far described by other authors in mammals. Using methylation sensitive and insensitive enzymes (HpaII and MspI) and successive 3' terminal labelling (fill-in), we found a greater degree of DNA methylation in premeiotic germ and sperm cells compared to somatic tissue such as hepatocytes. Furthermore the degree of total DNA methylation in spermatozoa appears somewhere between premeiotic germ cells and somatic tissue. Blot hybridization shows that two highly conserved repetitive sequences in amphibian T. c. c., pTvm1 and pTvm8, contribute significantly to the degree of DNA methylation, suggesting a function for these sequences, such as a role in transcriptional regulation.

Induction of XIST expression from the human active X chromosome in mouse/human somatic cell hybrids by DNA demethylation

X chromosome inactivation occurs early in mammalian development to transcriptionally silence one of the pair of X chromosomes in females. The XIST RNA, a large untranslated RNA that is expressed solely from the inactive X chromosome, is implicated in the process of inactivation. As previous studies have shown that the XIST gene is methylated on the active X chromosome, we have treated a mouse/human somatic cell hybrid retaining an active human X chromosome with demethylating agents to determine whether expression of the human XIST gene could be induced. Stable expression of XIST was observed after several rounds of demethylation and stability of XIST expression correlated with the loss of methylation at the three sites analysed. We conclude that methylation is sufficient to inhibit expression of the XIST gene in somatic cell hybrids. No loss of expression was detected for eight other X-linked genes from the active X chromosome that was expressing XIST , suggesting that additional developmental or species-specific factors are required for the inactivation process.

Regulation of X-chromosome inactivation in development in mice and humans

Dosage compensation for X-linked genes in mammals is accomplished by inactivating one of the two X chromosomes in females. X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) occurs during development, coupled with cell differentiation. In somatic cells, XCI is random, whereas in extraembryonic tissues, XCI is imprinted in that the paternally inherited X chromosome is preferentially inactivated. Inactivation is initiated from an X-linked locus, the X-inactivation center (Xic), and inactivity spreads along the chromosome toward both ends. XCI is established by complex mechanisms, including DNA methylation, heterochromatinization, and late replication. Once established, inactivity is stably maintained in subsequent cell generations. The function of an X-linked regulatory gene, Xist, is critically involved in XCI. The Xist gene maps to the Xic, it is transcribed only from the inactive X chromosome, and the Xist RNA associates with the inactive X chromosome in the nucleus. Investigations with Xist-containing transgenes and with deletions of the Xist gene have shown that the Xist gene is required in cis for XCI. Regulation of XCI is therefore accomplished through regulation of Xist. Transcription of the Xist gene is itself regulated by DNA methylation. Hence, the differential methylation of the Xist gene observed in sperm and eggs and its recognition by protein binding constitute the most likely mechanism regulating imprinted preferential expression of the paternal allele in preimplantation embryos and imprinted paternal XCI in extraembryonic tissues. This article reviews the mechanisms underlying XCI and recent advances elucidating the functions of the Xist gene in mice and humans.

The role of Xist in X-inactivation

The past year has seen important progress in our understanding of the role of the X inactive specific transcript gene (Xist) in the initiation and propagation of X-inactivation. A 35 kb Xist transgene had been shown to recapitulate the functions of the X-inactivation centre, progress has been made towards indentifying factors controlling the randomness of X-inactivation, and RNA stabilisation has been shown to play a role in Xist regulation at the onset of X-inactivation.

Making sense of imprinting the mouse and human IGF2R loci

The mouse and human IGF2R genes are similar in terms of expression pattern, gene structure and organization. Both genes have features that are common to imprinted genes. These common features are allele-specific methylation and replication asynchrony, plus the ability to restrict expression to one parental allele in diploid cells despite the presence of two functional parental alleles. In inbred laboratory mice Igf2r is initially expressed from both parental chromosomes in preimplantation embryos, it then shows maternal-specific monoallelic expression in all tissues of the postimplantation embryo and adult. The human gene is similarly monoallelically expressed in preterm postimplantation embryonic tissues (preimplantation embryos have not been examined). The behaviour of the human gene then diverges from that observed in inbred mice because it shows biallelic expression in term embryonic tissues and in the adult. An extra difference displayed by the human gene is that monoallelic expression is polymorphic and only occurs in 50% of individuals. The mechanism of IGF2R imprinting will be discussed with relevance to these similarities and differences between the mouse and human genes.

Imprinting of the mouse Igf2r gene depends on an intronic CpG island

Gametic imprinting is a developmental process that uses cis-acting epigenetic mechanisms to induce parental-specific expression in autosomal and X-linked genes. From the limited knowledge we have of imprinted genes it seems clear that they play a role in regulating the growth and development of the placenta and embryo in utero, and also in the early post-natal phase. The biological function of imprinting in mammals is not yet understood but it may act to regulate the supply of nutrition to the embryo in order to maintain a balance between fetal demands and maternal resources. The molecular basis of imprinting any gene has not yet been disclosed. However. the current model proposes that single or clustered genes should be associated with a specific imprinting element which carries a reversible epigenetic imprinting signal, inherited from one parent and maintained on the same parental chromosome in diploid cells. A common imprinting recognition sequence has not been identified amongst the 20 known imprinted genes, but such an element is thought to exist from observations of mouse transgenes and transgenes of the imprinted H19 gene, which have shown that short DNA sequences can maintain imprinted expression at different chromosome locations. However, it is also clear from gene deletion experiments in the mouse and the analysis of deletions in the human Prader-Willi/Angelman syndromes that imprinted genes are also influenced by distant DNA sequences. We have earlier proposed that CG rich sequences resembling CpG islands, which are associated with many imprinted genes and often subject to parental-specific methylation, could act as a common imprinting element. The mouse insulin-like growth factor type 2 receptor (Igf2r) gene contains a CpG island known as region2, in the second intron. Region2 was proposed as the imprinting element of this gene because it inherited a methylation imprint from the female gamete that was maintained only on the maternal chromosome in diploid cells. We have used YAC (yeast artificial chromosome) transgenes carrying the complete Igf2r locus, to test if imprinting and parental-specific methylation of the mouse Igf2r gene is maintained when transferred to other chromosomal locations and to test whether imprinting is dependent on the intronic CpG island proposed as the imprinting element for this gene. Gametic imprints are epigenetic modifications which are imposed onto the gametic chromosomes and cause parental-specific differences in the expression of a small number of genes in the embryo. As a consequence, correct imposition of the imprints in the parental germlines is a prerequisite for successful development of mammals and any anomaly in the expression of imprinted genes is often accompanied by aberration of embryonic growth. The link between imprinting and growth regulation is best exemplified by the Igf2 and Igf2r genes. Both genes show parental-specific expression patterns in the embryo. Igf2 is a general embryonic mitogen, and mice lacking Igf2 are markedly reduced in size (DeChiara, T.M., Robertson, E.J., Efstratiadis, A., 1991. Parental imprinting of the mouse insulin-like growth factor II gene. Cell 64, 849-859). Igf2r acts to fine tune the amount of growth factor, and embryos lacking this gene show overgrowth and die perinatally (Lau, M.M., Stewart, C.E., Liu, Z., Bhatt, H., Rotwein, P., Stewart, C.L., 1994. Loss of the imprinted IGF2/cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor results in fetal overgrowth and perinatal lethality. Genes Dev. 8, 2953 2963; Wang, Z.Q., Fung, M.R., Barlow, D.P., Wagner, E.F., 1994. Regulation of embryonic growth and lysosomal targeting by the imprinted Igf2/Mpr gene. Nature 372, 464-467). The phenomenon of gametic imprinting is predicted to arise by an unusual regulation of the imposition and erasure of epigenetic modifications. There are three events which are required for imprinting: firstly, the imprint must be imposed in one of the gametes before fertilisat

Reactivation of XIST in normal fibroblasts and a somatic cell hybrid: abnormal localization of XIST RNA in hybrid cells

The XIST gene, expressed only from the inactive X chromosome, is a critical component of X inactivation. Although apparently unnecessary for maintenance of inactivation, XIST expression is thought to be sufficient for inactivation of genes in cis even when XIST is located abnormally on another chromosome. This repression appears to involve the association of XIST RNA with the chromosome from which it is expressed. Reactivated genes on the inactive X chromosome, however, maintain expression in several somatic cell hybrid lines with stable expression of XIST. We describe here another example of an XIST-expressing human-hamster hybrid that lacks X-linked gene repression in which the human XIST gene present on an active X chromosome was reactivated by treatment with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine. These data raise the possibility that human XIST RNA does not function properly in human-rodent somatic cell hybrids. As part of our approach to address this question, we reactivated the XIST gene in normal male fibroblasts and then compared their patterns of XIST RNA localization by subcellular fractionation and in situ hybridization with those of hybrid cells. Although XIST RNA is nuclear in all cell types, we found that the in situ signals are much more diffuse in hybrids than in human cells. These data suggest that hybrids lack components needed for XIST localization and, presumably, XIST-mediated gene repression.

A methylation imprint mark in the mouse imprinted gene Grf1/Cdc25Mm locus shares a common feature with the U2afbp-rs gene: an association with a short tandem repeat and a hypermethylated region

We identified a sperm-specific methylation imprint mark (Site II) associated with a short tandem repeat sequence and a site/region methylated in both gametes (Site I) in the Grf1 locus on mouse chromosome 9, which shared a common feature with the U2afbp-rs gene. Sites or regions of gamete-specific methylation in imprinted genes are strong candidates for carrying information regarding the parental origin of alleles. The gamete-specific methylation pattern of Sites I and II was conserved after fertilization, but attained the somatic cell pattern by the blastocyst stage. In primordial germ cells, Site I was methylated, but Site II was unmethylated in both male and female embryos, suggesting that the sperm-specific methylation imprint mark in Site II was established during spermatogenesis. These common features in methylation imprint regions may be a clue to identifying regions carrying primary information for the imprinting regulation.

Imprinting mechanisms in mammals

Imprinting is a genetic mechanism that determines expression or repression of genes according to their parental origin. Some imprinted genes occur in clusters in the genome. Recent work using transgenic mice shows that multiple cis-acting sequences are needed for correct imprinting. Mutation analysis in a normal chromosomal context reveals the importance of imprinting centres for regional establishment or maintenance of imprinting in a cluster. Elements that contribute to the function of imprinting centres and regional propagation of the imprints are CpG-rich differentially methylated regions (that during development retain germline imposed methylation or demethylation), direct repeat clusters, and unusual RNAs (antisense, non-translated etc.). The interaction of these cis elements with transacting factors such as methylase and chromatin factors establishes a hierarchical control system with local and regional effects.