1
|
Lohoff T, Ghazanfar S, Missarova A, Koulena N, Pierson N, Griffiths JA, Bardot ES, Eng CHL, Tyser RCV, Argelaguet R, Guibentif C, Srinivas S, Briscoe J, Simons BD, Hadjantonakis AK, Göttgens B, Reik W, Nichols J, Cai L, Marioni JC. Integration of spatial and single-cell transcriptomic data elucidates mouse organogenesis. Nat Biotechnol 2022; 40:74-85. [PMID: 34489600 PMCID: PMC8763645 DOI: 10.1038/s41587-021-01006-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Molecular profiling of single cells has advanced our knowledge of the molecular basis of development. However, current approaches mostly rely on dissociating cells from tissues, thereby losing the crucial spatial context of regulatory processes. Here, we apply an image-based single-cell transcriptomics method, sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization (seqFISH), to detect mRNAs for 387 target genes in tissue sections of mouse embryos at the 8-12 somite stage. By integrating spatial context and multiplexed transcriptional measurements with two single-cell transcriptome atlases, we characterize cell types across the embryo and demonstrate that spatially resolved expression of genes not profiled by seqFISH can be imputed. We use this high-resolution spatial map to characterize fundamental steps in the patterning of the midbrain-hindbrain boundary (MHB) and the developing gut tube. We uncover axes of cell differentiation that are not apparent from single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data, such as early dorsal-ventral separation of esophageal and tracheal progenitor populations in the gut tube. Our method provides an approach for studying cell fate decisions in complex tissues and development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Lohoff
- Wellcome-Medical Research Council Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Epigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - S Ghazanfar
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - A Missarova
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - N Koulena
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - N Pierson
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - J A Griffiths
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Genomics Plc, Cambridge, UK
| | - E S Bardot
- Developmental Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - C-H L Eng
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - R C V Tyser
- Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - R Argelaguet
- Epigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - C Guibentif
- Wellcome-Medical Research Council Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - S Srinivas
- Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - J Briscoe
- The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - B D Simons
- Wellcome-Medical Research Council Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- The Wellcome/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - A-K Hadjantonakis
- Developmental Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - B Göttgens
- Wellcome-Medical Research Council Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - W Reik
- Wellcome-Medical Research Council Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Epigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.
- Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
| | - J Nichols
- Wellcome-Medical Research Council Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - L Cai
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
| | - J C Marioni
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reik W, Popp C, Ficz G, Branco M, Branco M, Krueger C, Hemberger M, Dean W. Epigenetic regulation of imprinting, reprogramming, and lineage commitment in mammals. N Biotechnol 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2010.01.292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
3
|
Abstract
The seminal work of McGrath and Solter (1) and independently of Surani et al. (2) in 1984 established the fundamental principle of nuclear nonequivalency; that is, chromosomes of both paternal and maternal origin are required for development to term in mammals. This was achieved through the creation of diploid reconstituted zygotes, which contained either two maternal or two paternal pronuclei. Embryos containing pronuclei exclusively of maternal or paternal origin display characteristic developmental abnormalities and fail to develop to term. This failure is partially explained by the observation that paternally and maternally derived genomes have complementary roles during embryogenesis, contributing differentially to embryonic and extraembryonic lineages (2-5). These reconstitutions were accomplished by nuclear transplantation and karyoplast fusion using HVJ or Sendai virus-assisted fusion (1). These experiments laid the foundation for the discovery and exploration of this unique form of non-Mendelian mammalian gene regulation whereby expression of genes and hence phenotype were dictated by the parent from whom they where inherited. This parent-of-origin phenomenon is known as genomic imprinting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W L Dean
- Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, Developmental Genetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lim D, Bowdin SC, Tee L, Kirby GA, Blair E, Fryer A, Lam W, Oley C, Cole T, Brueton LA, Reik W, Macdonald F, Maher ER. Clinical and molecular genetic features of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome associated with assisted reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod 2008; 24:741-7. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 173] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
|
5
|
Abstract
Imprinted genes tend to be clustered in the genome. Most of these clusters have been found to be under the control of discrete DNA elements called imprinting centres (ICs) which are normally differentially methylated in the germline. ICs can regulate imprinted expression and epigenetic marks at many genes in the region, even those which lie several megabases away. Some of the molecular and cellular mechanisms by which ICs control other genes and regulatory regions in the cluster are becoming clear. One involves the insulation of genes on one side of the IC from enhancers on the other, mediated by the insulator protein CTCF and higher-order chromatin interactions. Another mechanism may involve non-coding RNAs that originate from the IC, targeting histone modifications to the surrounding genes. Given that several imprinting clusters contain CTCF dependent insulators and/or non-coding RNAs, it is likely that one or both of these two mechanisms regulate imprinting at many loci. Both mechanisms involve a variety of epigenetic marks including DNA methylation and histone modifications but the hierarchy of and interactions between these modifications are not yet understood. The challenge now is to establish a chain of developmental events beginning with differential methylation of an IC in the germline and ending with imprinting of many genes, often in a lineage dependent manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Lewis
- Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
In mammals, imprinted genes have an important role in feto-placental development. They affect the growth, morphology and nutrient transfer capacity of the placenta and, thereby, control the nutrient supply for fetal growth. In particular, the reciprocally imprinted Igf2-H19 gene complex has a central role in these processes and matches the placental nutrient supply to the fetal nutrient demands for growth. Comparison of Igf2P0 and complete Igf2 null mice has shown that interplay between placental and fetal Igf2 regulates both placental growth and nutrient transporter abundance. In turn, epigenetic modification of imprinted genes via changes in DNA methylation may provide a mechanism linking environmental cues to placental phenotype, with consequences for development both before and after birth. Changes in expression of imprinted genes, therefore, have major implications for developmental programming and may explain the poor prognosis of the infant born small for gestational age and the wide spectrum of adult-onset diseases that originate in utero.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Fowden
- Department of Physiology, Cambridge, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Angiolini E, Fowden A, Coan P, Sandovici I, Smith P, Dean W, Burton G, Tycko B, Reik W, Sibley C, Constância M. Regulation of Placental Efficiency for Nutrient Transport by Imprinted Genes. Placenta 2006; 27 Suppl A:S98-102. [PMID: 16503350 DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2005.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2005] [Revised: 12/08/2005] [Accepted: 12/27/2005] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Intrauterine growth and development can impact upon the long-term health of an individual. The fetus is dependent upon the placenta for its supply of nutrients and oxygen from the mother. In turn, the functional capacity of the placenta to supply that demand is under the control of the fetal and maternal genomes. Recent evidence suggests that imprinted genes, a class of genes found in placental mammals whose expression depends on their parental origin, have multiple roles in the placenta. The imprinted genes regulate the growth and transport capacity of the placenta, thereby controlling the supply of nutrients. They may also regulate the growth rate of fetal tissues directly, thereby controlling nutrient demand by the fetus. Recent studies using mice with deletions or disruption of imprinted genes with an altered balance between placental and fetal growth and changes in placental efficiency are indicative of feto-placental signalling of fetal nutrient demand. We propose that signalling mechanisms involving growth demand signals and nutrient transporters are likely to occur and are important for fine tuning normal fetal growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Angiolini
- Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Monk D, Sanches R, Arnaud P, Apostolidou S, Hills FA, Abu-Amero S, Murrell A, Friess H, Reik W, Stanier P, Constância M, Moore GE. Imprinting of IGF2 P0 transcript and novel alternatively spliced INS-IGF2 isoforms show differences between mouse and human. Hum Mol Genet 2006; 15:1259-69. [PMID: 16531418 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddl041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Genomic imprinting is limited to a subset of genes that play critical roles in fetal growth, development and behaviour. One of the most studied imprinted genes encodes insulin-like growth factor 2, and aberrant imprinting and DNA methylation of this gene is associated with the growth disorders Beckwith-Wiedemann and Silver-Russell syndromes and many human cancers. Specific isoforms of this gene have been shown to be essential for normal placental function, as mice carrying paternal null alleles for the Igf2-P0 transcript are growth restricted at birth. We report here the identification of three novel human transcripts from the IGF2 locus. One is equivalent to the mouse Igf2-P0 transcript, whereas the two others (INSIGF long and short) originate from the upstream INS gene that alternatively splices to downstream IGF2 exons. In order to elucidate the molecular mechanisms involved in the complex imprinting of these novel IGF2 transcripts, both the allele-specific expression and methylation for all the IGF2 promoters including P0 and the INSIGF transcripts were analysed in human tissues. Similar to the mouse, the human IGF2-P0 transcript is paternally expressed; however, its expression is not limited to placenta. This expression correlates with tissue-specific promoter methylation on the maternal allele. The two novel INSIGF transcripts reported here use the INS promoter and show highly restricted tissue expression profiles including the pancreas. As previously reported for INS in the yolk sac, we demonstrate complex, tissue-specific imprinting of these transcripts. The finding of additional transcripts within this locus will have important implications for IGF2 regulation in both cancer and metabolism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Monk
- Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cetin I, Foidart JM, Miozzo M, Raun T, Jansson T, Tsatsaris V, Reik W, Cross J, Hauguel-de-Mouzon S, Illsley N, Kingdom J, Huppertz B. Fetal growth restriction: a workshop report. Placenta 2005. [PMID: 15450396 DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2004.02.004s014340040400058x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is associated with significantly increased perinatal morbidity and mortality as well as cardiovascular disease and glucose intolerance in adult life. A number of disorders from genetic to metabolic, vascular, coagulative, autoimmune, as well as infectious, can influence fetal growth by damaging the placenta, leading to IUGR as a result of many possible fetal, placental and maternal disorders. Strict definitions of IUGR and of its severity are needed in order to eventually distinguish among different phenotypes, such as gestational age at onset, degree of growth restriction and presence of hypoxia. This report explores and reviews some of the most recent developments in both clinical and basic research on intrauterine growth restriction, by seeking mechanisms that involve genetic factors, utero-placental nutrient availability and vascular growth factors. New exciting findings on the genomic imprinting defects potentially associated with IUGR, and the placental anomalies associated with the decreased nutrient transport are summarized. Moreover, recent data on angiogenic growth factors as well as new information arising from application of gene chip technologies are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Cetin
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology L. Mangiagalli, University of Milano School of Medicine, via della Commenda 12, 20122 Milano, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cetin I, Foidart JM, Miozzo M, Raun T, Jansson T, Tsatsaris V, Reik W, Cross J, Hauguel-de-Mouzon S, Illsley N, Kingdom J, Huppertz B. Fetal growth restriction: a workshop report. Placenta 2005; 25:753-7. [PMID: 15450396 DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2004.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/09/2004] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is associated with significantly increased perinatal morbidity and mortality as well as cardiovascular disease and glucose intolerance in adult life. A number of disorders from genetic to metabolic, vascular, coagulative, autoimmune, as well as infectious, can influence fetal growth by damaging the placenta, leading to IUGR as a result of many possible fetal, placental and maternal disorders. Strict definitions of IUGR and of its severity are needed in order to eventually distinguish among different phenotypes, such as gestational age at onset, degree of growth restriction and presence of hypoxia. This report explores and reviews some of the most recent developments in both clinical and basic research on intrauterine growth restriction, by seeking mechanisms that involve genetic factors, utero-placental nutrient availability and vascular growth factors. New exciting findings on the genomic imprinting defects potentially associated with IUGR, and the placental anomalies associated with the decreased nutrient transport are summarized. Moreover, recent data on angiogenic growth factors as well as new information arising from application of gene chip technologies are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Cetin
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology L. Mangiagalli, University of Milano School of Medicine, via della Commenda 12, 20122 Milano, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sibley CP, Coan PM, Ferguson-Smith AC, Dean W, Hughes J, Smith P, Reik W, Burton GJ, Fowden AL, Constância M. Placental-specific insulin-like growth factor 2 (Igf2) regulates the diffusional exchange characteristics of the mouse placenta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:8204-8. [PMID: 15150410 PMCID: PMC419581 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0402508101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 208] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2004] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Restricted fetal growth is associated with postnatal mortality and morbidity and may be directly related to alterations in the capacity of the placenta to supply nutrients. We proposed previously that imprinted genes can regulate nutrient supply by the placenta. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the insulin-like growth factor 2 gene (Igf2) transcribed from the placental-specific promoter (P0) regulates the development of the diffusional permeability properties of the mouse placenta. Using mice in which placental-specific Igf2 had been deleted (P0), we measured the transfer in vivo of three inert hydrophilic solutes of increasing size (14C-mannitol, 51CrEDTA, and 14C-inulin). At embryonic day 19, placental and fetal weights in P0 conceptuses were reduced to 66% and 76%, respectively, of wild type. In P0 mutants, the permeability.surface area product for the tracers at this stage of development was 68% of that of controls; this effect was independent of tracer size. Stereological analysis of histological sections revealed the surface area of the exchange barrier in the labyrinth of the mouse placenta to be reduced and thickness increased in P0 fetuses compared to wild type. As a result, the average theoretical diffusing capacity in P0 knockout placentas was dramatically reduced to 40% of that of wild-type placentas. These data show that placental Igf2 regulates the development of the diffusional exchange characteristics of the mouse placenta. This provides a mechanism for the role of imprinted genes in controlling placental nutrient supply and fetal growth. Altered placental Igf2 could be a cause of idiopathic intrauterine growth restriction in the human.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C P Sibley
- Academic Unit of Child Health, Medical School, University of Manchester, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester M13 OJH, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Diaz-Meyer N, Day CD, Khatod K, Maher ER, Cooper W, Reik W, Junien C, Graham G, Algar E, Der Kaloustian VM, Higgins MJ. Silencing of CDKN1C (p57KIP2) is associated with hypomethylation at KvDMR1 in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. J Med Genet 2004; 40:797-801. [PMID: 14627666 PMCID: PMC1735305 DOI: 10.1136/jmg.40.11.797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) arises by several genetic and epigenetic mechanisms affecting the balance of imprinted gene expression in chromosome 11p15.5. The most frequent alteration associated with BWS is the absence of methylation at the maternal allele of KvDMR1, an intronic CpG island within the KCNQ1 gene. Targeted deletion of KvDMR1 suggests that this locus is an imprinting control region (ICR) that regulates multiple genes in 11p15.5. Cell culture based enhancer blocking assays indicate that KvDMR1 may function as a methylation modulated chromatin insulator and/or silencer. OBJECTIVE To determine the potential consequence of loss of methylation (LOM) at KvDMR1 in the development of BWS. METHODS The steady state levels of CDKN1C gene expression in fibroblast cells from normal individuals, and from persons with BWS who have LOM at KvDMR1, was determined by both real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and ribonuclease protection assay (RPA). Methylation of the CDKN1C promoter region was assessed by Southern hybridisation using a methylation sensitive restriction endonuclease. RESULTS Both qPCR and RPA clearly demonstrated a marked decrease (86-93%) in the expression level of the CDKN1C gene in cells derived from patients with BWS, who had LOM at KvDMR1. Southern analysis indicated that downregulation of CDKN1C in these patients was not associated with hypermethylation at the presumptive CDKN1C promoter. CONCLUSIONS An epimutation at KvDMR1, the absence of maternal methylation, causes the aberrant silencing of CDKN1C, some 180 kb away on the maternal chromosome. Similar to mutations at this locus, this silencing may give rise to BWS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Diaz-Meyer
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Reik W, Murrell A, Lewis A, Mitsuya K, Umlauf D, Dean W, Higgins M, Feil R. Chromosome loops, insulators, and histone methylation: new insights into regulation of imprinting in clusters. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2004; 69:29-37. [PMID: 16117630 DOI: 10.1101/sqb.2004.69.29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- W Reik
- Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB2 4AT, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Our contribution discusses the potential use of cell therapies (nucleus replacement) in mammalian oocytes. It is assumed that these approaches may be used, for example, for the elimination of mutated maternally transmitted mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) as well as for the reconstruction of normal oocytes from oocytes that are developmentally compromised. Moreover, it is speculated that the replacement of germinal vesicles by somatic cells may result in cells of the haploid genome: the production of germ cells from somatic cells. The preliminary results obtained in our laboratories are discussed in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Fulka
- Institute of Animal Production, Department of Biology of Reproduction, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Epigenetic modifications of DNA and chromatin are important for genome function during development and in adults. DNA and chromatin modifications have central importance for genomic imprinting and other aspects of epigenetic control of gene expression. In somatic lineages, modifications are generally stably maintained and are characteristic of different specialized tissues. The mammalian genome undergoes major reprogramming of modification patterns in germ cells and in the early embryo. Some of the factors that are involved both in maintenance and in reprogramming, such as methyltransferases, are being identified. Epigenetic reprogramming is deficient in animal cloning, which is a major explanation for the inefficiency of the cloning procedure. Deficiencies in reprogramming are likely to underlie the occurrence of epimutations and of epigenetic inheritance. Environmental factors can alter epigenetic modifications and may thus have long-lasting effects on phenotype. Epigenomics methods are being developed to catalogue genome modifications under normal and pathological conditions. Epigenetic engineering is likely to play an important role in medicine in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Reik
- Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, Developmental Genetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Maher ER, Brueton LA, Bowdin SC, Luharia A, Cooper W, Cole TR, Macdonald F, Sampson JR, Barratt CL, Reik W, Hawkins MM. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and assisted reproduction technology (ART). J Med Genet 2003; 40:62-4. [PMID: 12525545 PMCID: PMC1735252 DOI: 10.1136/jmg.40.1.62] [Citation(s) in RCA: 461] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
17
|
Reik W, Davies K, Dean W, Kelsey G, Constância M. Imprinted genes and the coordination of fetal and postnatal growth in mammals. Novartis Found Symp 2002; 237:19-31; discussion 31-42. [PMID: 11444044 DOI: 10.1002/0470846666.ch3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
A substantial proportion of genes that control fetal growth in placental mammals are imprinted. Imprinted genes can act in fetal tissues to regulate growth by cell proliferation, cell death and the make up of extracellular space. Imprinted growth-promoting genes such as Igf2 probably act predominantly in an endocrine fashion, thus coordinating organ growth with the growth of the organism. In overgrowth and growth deficiency syndromes, however, imprinted growth factors can act by more local mechanisms, resulting in disproportionate growth. In addition to controlling fetal growth directly and thereby determining the nutritional demand of the fetus, imprinted genes can also apparently limit the nutritional supply to the fetus through the placenta. Imprinted genes may also be involved in postnatal growth up to weaning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Reik
- Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, Developmental Genetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
DNA methylation is usually associated with transcriptional silencing, but in the imprinted mouse Igf2 gene, the paternally expressed copy is methylated in two discrete differentially methylated regions (DMRs). DMR1 is located upstream of the fetal promoters and has been shown to be a methylation sensitive silencer. Here we examine the role of the intragenic DMR2 by gene targeting. In contrast to DMR1, deletion of DMR2 on the maternal allele did not lead to activation of the silent Igf2 gene. Deletion of a 54 bp methylated core region in DMR2 on the paternal allele, however, reduced Igf2 mRNA levels and was associated with fetal growth retardation. Nuclear run-on assays showed that the core region influenced transcription initiation, and luciferase reporter assays suggested that its methylation increases transcription. These results reveal a novel mechanism of gene expression whereby intragenic methylation can increase levels of transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Murrell
- Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, Developmental Genetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dean W, Santos F, Stojkovic M, Zakhartchenko V, Walter J, Wolf E, Reik W. Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:13734-8. [PMID: 11717434 PMCID: PMC61110 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.241522698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 707] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2001] [Accepted: 10/03/2001] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Mouse embryos undergo genome-wide methylation reprogramming by demethylation in early preimplantation development, followed by remethylation thereafter. Here we show that genome-wide reprogramming is conserved in several mammalian species and ask whether it also occurs in embryos cloned with the use of highly methylated somatic donor nuclei. Normal bovine, rat, and pig zygotes showed a demethylated paternal genome, suggesting active demethylation. In bovine embryos methylation was further reduced during cleavage up to the eight-cell stage, and this reduction in methylation was followed by de novo methylation by the 16-cell stage. In cloned one-cell embryos there was a reduction in methylation consistent with active demethylation, but no further demethylation occurred subsequently. Instead, de novo methylation and nuclear reorganization of methylation patterns resembling those of differentiated cells occurred precociously in many cloned embryos. Cloned, but not normal, morulae had highly methylated nuclei in all blastomeres that resembled those of the fibroblast donor cells. Our study shows that epigenetic reprogramming occurs aberrantly in most cloned embryos; incomplete reprogramming may contribute to the low efficiency of cloning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Dean
- Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, Developmental Genetics Program, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB2 4AT, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
DNA methylation is a major epigenetic modification of the genome that regulates crucial aspects of its function. Genomic methylation patterns in somatic differentiated cells are generally stable and heritable. However, in mammals there are at least two developmental periods-in germ cells and in preimplantation embryos-in which methylation patterns are reprogrammed genome wide, generating cells with a broad developmental potential. Epigenetic reprogramming in germ cells is critical for imprinting; reprogramming in early embryos also affects imprinting. Reprogramming is likely to have a crucial role in establishing nuclear totipotency in normal development and in cloned animals, and in the erasure of acquired epigenetic information. A role of reprogramming in stem cell differentiation is also envisaged. DNA methylation is one of the best-studied epigenetic modifications of DNA in all unicellular and multicellular organisms. In mammals and other vertebrates, methylation occurs predominantly at the symmetrical dinucleotide CpG (1-4). Symmetrical methylation and the discovery of a DNA methyltransferase that prefers a hemimethylated substrate, Dnmt1 (4), suggested a mechanism by which specific patterns of methylation in the genome could be maintained. Patterns imposed on the genome at defined developmental time points in precursor cells could be maintained by Dnmt1, and would lead to predetermined programs of gene expression during development in descendants of the precursor cells (5, 6). This provided a means to explain how patterns of differentiation could be maintained by populations of cells. In addition, specific demethylation events in differentiated tissues could then lead to further changes in gene expression as needed. Neat and convincing as this model is, it is still largely unsubstantiated. While effects of methylation on expression of specific genes, particularly imprinted ones (7) and some retrotransposons (8), have been demonstrated in vivo, it is still unclear whether or not methylation is involved in the control of gene expression during normal development (9-13). Although enzymes have been identified that can methylate DNA de novo (Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b) (14), it is unknown how specific patterns of methylation are established in the genome. Mechanisms for active demethylation have been suggested, but no enzymes have been identified that carry out this function in vivo (15-17). Genomewide alterations in methylation-brought about, for example, by knockouts of the methylase genes-result in embryo lethality or developmental defects, but the basis for abnormal development still remains to be discovered (7, 14). What is clear, however, is that in mammals there are developmental periods of genomewide reprogramming of methylation patterns in vivo. Typically, a substantial part of the genome is demethylated, and after some time remethylated, in a cell- or tissue-specific pattern. The developmental dynamics of these reprogramming events, as well as some of the enzymatic mechanisms involved and the biological purposes, are beginning to be understood. Here we look at what is known about reprogramming in mammals and discuss how it might relate to developmental potency and imprinting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Reik
- Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Epigenetic modifications of DNA such as methylation are important for genome function during development and in adults. DNA methylation has central importance for genomic imprinting and other aspects of epigenetic control of gene expression, and during development methylation patterns are largely maintained in somatic lineages. The mammalian genome undergoes major reprogramming of methylation patterns in the germ cells and in the early embryo. Some of the factors that are involved both in maintenance and in reprogramming, such as methyltransferases, are being identified. Epigenetic changes are likely to be important in animal cloning, and influence the occurrence of epimutations and of epigenetic inheritance. Environmental factors can alter epigenetic modifications and may thus have long lasting effects on phenotype. Epigenetic engineering is likely to play an important role in medicine in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Reik
- Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Remacle C, Reusens B, Kalbe L, Hales CN, Ozanne SE, Bréant B, Polak M, Rees WD, McKinnon CM, Olsen SF, Nerup J, Tamarit J, Reik W. Early malnutrition and programming of adult degenerative diseases: experimental, epidemiological and preventive studies. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2001; 11:99-102. [PMID: 11894764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- C Remacle
- Laboratoire de Biologie Cellulaire, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
A growing number of medical, scientific and biotechnological procedures rely on culture of mammalian preimplantation embryos. This review presents currently available data on aberrant offspring development that sometimes arises from commonly applied in-vitro procedures in humans, ruminant species and mice. Comparison between mammalian species reveals similarities in the phenotypic abnormalities that are observed at fetal and perinatal stages of development. In particular, aberrant effects on fetal growth have been observed in multiple studies in which serum complemented the preimplantation culture medium. Although it remains to be determined whether there is a common causal mechanism(s) involved, several hypotheses have been put forward to account for the variety of the observed developmental abnormalities. One of these postulates that culture can result in the epigenetic deregulation of developmentally important genes, and that such epigenetic alterations would affect in particular the expression of genes that are subject to genomic imprinting. Imprinted genes play key roles in the control of fetal growth, and altered imprinting can cause growth defects. Some recent in-vitro culture studies on mice and ruminant species now lend support to this hypothesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Khosla
- Programme in Developmental Genetics, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pickard B, Dean W, Engemann S, Bergmann K, Fuermann M, Jung M, Reis A, Allen N, Reik W, Walter J. Epigenetic targeting in the mouse zygote marks DNA for later methylation: a mechanism for maternal effects in development. Mech Dev 2001; 103:35-47. [PMID: 11335110 DOI: 10.1016/s0925-4773(01)00329-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The transgenic sequences in the mouse line TKZ751 are demethylated on a DBA/2 inbred strain background but become highly methylated at postimplantation stages in offspring of a cross with a BALB/c female. In the reciprocal cross the transgene remains demethylated suggesting that imprinted BALB/c methylation modifiers or egg cytoplasmic factors are responsible for this striking maternal effect on de novo methylation. Reciprocal pronuclear transplantation experiments were carried out to distinguish between these mechanisms. The results indicate that a maternally-derived oocyte cytoplasmic factor from BALB/c marks the TKZ751 sequences at fertilization; this mark and postzygotic BALB/c modifiers are both required for de novo methylation of the target sequences at postimplantation stages. Using genetic linkage analyses we mapped the maternal effect to a locus on chromosome 17. Moreover, seven postzygotic modifier loci were identified that increase the postimplantation level of methylation. Analysis of interactions between the maternal and the postzygotic loci shows that both are needed for de novo methylation in the offspring. The combined experiments thus reveal a novel epigenetic marking process at fertilization which targets DNA for later methylation in the foetus. The most significant consequence is that the genotype of the mother can influence the epigenotype of the offspring by this marking process. A number of parental and imprinting effects may be explained by this epigenetic marking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Pickard
- Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Schofield PN, Joyce JA, Lam WK, Grandjean V, Ferguson-Smith A, Reik W, Maher ER. Genomic imprinting and cancer; new paradigms in the genetics of neoplasia. Toxicol Lett 2001; 120:151-60. [PMID: 11323172 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4274(01)00294-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The role of epigenetic modification of gene expression is becoming increasingly important in how we understand the loss of tumour suppressor gene function in a variety of tumours and tumour predisposing syndromes. This review explores the importance of epimutation in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and Wilms' tumour and focuses on genomic methylation in both imprinted and non-imprinted genes as a key mechanism in the development of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P N Schofield
- Laboratory of Stem Cell Biology, Department of Anatomy, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3DY, Cambridge, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic marking mechanism by which certain genes become repressed on one of the two parental alleles. Imprinting plays important roles in mammalian development, and in humans its deregulation may result in disease and carcinogenesis. During different medical, technological and scientific interventions, pre-implantation embryos and cells are taken from their natural environment and subjected to culture in artificial media. Studies in the mouse demonstrate that environmental stress, such as in vitro culture, can affect the somatic maintenance of epigenetic marks at imprinted loci. These effects are associated with aberrant growth and morphology at fetal and perinatal stages of development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S L Thompson
- Programme in Developmental Genetics, The Babraham Institute, CB2 4AT, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Valenza-Schaerly P, Pickard B, Walter J, Jung M, Pourcel L, Reik W, Gauguier D, Vergnaud G, Pourcel C. A dominant modifier of transgene methylation is mapped by QTL analysis to mouse chromosome 13. Genome Res 2001; 11:382-8. [PMID: 11230162 PMCID: PMC311085 DOI: 10.1101/gr.163801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The single-copy hepatitis B virus transgene in the E36 transgenic mouse strain undergoes methylation changes in a parent-of-origin, tissue, and strain-specific fashion. In a C57BL/6 background, the paternally transmitted transgene is methylated in 30% of cells, whereas it is methylated in more than 80% of cells in (BALB/c x C57BL/6) F1 mice. We established previously that several genetic factors were likely to contribute to the transgene methylation profile, some with demethylating and some with de novo methylating activities. Using quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping, we have now localized one major modifier locus on chromosome 13 (Mod13), which explains a 30% increase in the methylation level of this transgene with no effect on the flanking endogenous sequences. No other QTL could be identified, except for a demethylating activity of low significance located on chromosome 12. Recombinant inbred mice containing a BALB/c allele of Mod13 were then used to show that the presence of Mod13 is sufficient to induce de novo methylation. A segregation between de novo methylation and repression of transgene expression was uncovered, suggesting that this genetic system is also useful for the identification of factors that interpret methylation patterns in the genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Valenza-Schaerly
- IECH Institut de Génétique et Microbiologie, Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Khosla S, Dean W, Brown D, Reik W, Feil R. Culture of preimplantation mouse embryos affects fetal development and the expression of imprinted genes. Biol Reprod 2001; 64:918-26. [PMID: 11207209 DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod64.3.918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 447] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Culture of preimplantation mammalian embryos and cells can influence their subsequent growth and differentiation. Previously, we reported that culture of mouse embryonic stem cells is associated with deregulation of genomic imprinting and affects the potential for these cells to develop into normal fetuses. The purpose of our current study was to determine whether culture of preimplantation mouse embryos in a chemically defined medium (M16) with or without fetal calf serum (FCS) can affect their subsequent development and imprinted gene expression. Only one third of the blastocysts that had been cultured from two-cell embryos in M16 medium complemented with FCS developed into viable Day 14 fetuses after transfer into recipients. These M16 + FCS fetuses were reduced in weight as compared with controls and M16 fetuses and had decreased expression of the imprinted H19 and insulin-like growth factor 2 genes associated with a gain of DNA methylation at an imprinting control region upstream of H19. They also displayed increased expression of the imprinted gene Grb10. The growth factor receptor binding gene Grb7, in contrast, was strongly reduced in its expression in most of the M16 + FCS fetuses. No alterations were detected for the imprinted gene MEST: Preimplantation culture in the presence of serum can influence the regulation of multiple growth-related imprinted genes, thus leading to aberrant fetal growth and development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Khosla
- Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting and Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience, The Babraham Institute, Babraham, Cambridge CB2 4AT, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
|
30
|
Abstract
Genomic imprinting affects several dozen mammalian genes and results in the expression of those genes from only one of the two parental chromosomes. This is brought about by epigenetic instructions--imprints--that are laid down in the parental germ cells. Imprinting is a particularly important genetic mechanism in mammals, and is thought to influence the transfer of nutrients to the fetus and the newborn from the mother. Consistent with this view is the fact that imprinted genes tend to affect growth in the womb and behaviour after birth. Aberrant imprinting disturbs development and is the cause of various disease syndromes. The study of imprinting also provides new insights into epigenetic gene modification during development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Reik
- Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, Developmental Genetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Engel JR, Smallwood A, Harper A, Higgins MJ, Oshimura M, Reik W, Schofield PN, Maher ER. Epigenotype-phenotype correlations in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. J Med Genet 2000; 37:921-6. [PMID: 11106355 PMCID: PMC1734494 DOI: 10.1136/jmg.37.12.921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) is a model imprinting disorder resulting from mutations or epigenetic events involving imprinted genes at chromosome 11p15.5. Thus, germline mutations in CDKN1C, uniparental disomy (UPD), and loss of imprinting of IGF2 and other imprinted genes have been implicated. Many familial BWS cases have germline CDKN1C mutations. However, most BWS cases are sporadic and UPD or putative imprinting errors predominate in this group. We have identified previously a subgroup of sporadic cases with loss of imprinting (LOI) of IGF2 and epigenetic silencing of H19 proposed to be caused by a defect in a distal 11p15.5 imprinting control element (designated BWSIC1). However, many sporadic BWS patients show biallelic IGF2 expression in the presence of normal H19 methylation and expression patterns. This and other evidence suggested the existence of a further imprinting control element (BWSIC2) at 11p15. 5. Recently, we showed that a subgroup of BWS patients have loss of methylation (LOM) at a differentially methylated region (KvDMR1) within the KCNQ1 gene centromeric to the IGF2 and H19 genes. We have now analysed a large series of sporadic cases to define the frequency and phenotypic correlates of epigenetic abnormalities in BWS. LOM at KvDMR1 was detected by Southern analysis or a novel PCR based method in 35 of 69 (51%) sporadic BWS without UPD. LOM at KvDMR1 was often, but not invariably associated with LOI of IGF2. KvDMR1 LOM was not detected in BWS patients with putative BWSIC1 defects and cases with KvDMR1 LOM (that is, putative BWSIC2 defects) invariably had a normal H19 methylation pattern. The incidence of exomphalos in putative BWSIC2 defect patients was not significantly different from that in patients with germline CDKN1C mutations (20/29 and 13/15 respectively), but was significantly greater than that in patients with putative BWSIC1 defects (0/5, p=0.007) and UPD (0/22, p<0.0001). These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that LOM of KvDMR1 (BWSIC2 defect) results in epigenetic silencing of CDKN1C and variable LOI of IGF2. BWS patients with embryonal tumours have UPD or a BWSIC1 defect but not LOM of KvDMR1. This study has further shown how (1) variations in phenotypic expression of BWS may be linked to specific molecular subgroups and (2) molecular analysis of BWS can provide insights into mechanisms of imprinting regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J R Engel
- Section of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Engemann S, Strödicke M, Paulsen M, Franck O, Reinhardt R, Lane N, Reik W, Walter J. Sequence and functional comparison in the Beckwith-Wiedemann region: implications for a novel imprinting centre and extended imprinting. Hum Mol Genet 2000; 9:2691-706. [PMID: 11063728 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/9.18.2691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The clustered organization of most imprinted genes in mammals suggests coordinated genetic and epigenetic control mechanisms. Comparisons between human and mouse will help in elucidating these mechanisms by identifying structural and functional similarities. Previously we reported on such a comparison in the central part of the mouse imprinting cluster on distal chromosome 7 with the homologous Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) gene cluster on human chromosome 11p15.5. Here we focus on the adjacent sequences of 0.5 Mb including the KCNQ1/Kcnq1 and CDKN1C/Cdkn1c genes, which are implicated in BWS, and on one of the proposed boundary regions of the imprinting cluster. As in the previously analysed central region, this part of the cluster exhibits a highly conserved arrangement and structure of genes. The most striking similarity is found in the 3' part of the KCNQ1/Kcnq1 genes in large stretches of mostly non-coding sequences. The conserved region includes the recently identified KCNQ1OT1/Kcnq1ot1 antisense transcripts, flanked by a strikingly conserved cluster of LINE/Line elements and a CpG island which we show to carry a maternal germline methylation imprint. This region is likely to be the proposed second imprinting centre (IC2) in the BWS cluster. We also identified several novel genes inside and outside the previously proposed boundaries of the imprinting cluster. One of the genes outside the cluster, Obph1, is imprinted in mouse placenta indicating that at least in extra-embryonic tissues the imprinting cluster extends into a larger domain.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Alternative Splicing/genetics
- Amino Acid Sequence
- Animals
- Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome/genetics
- Chromosomes, Artificial, Bacterial/genetics
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11/genetics
- Cloning, Molecular
- Conserved Sequence/genetics
- CpG Islands/genetics
- Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p57
- Exons/genetics
- Expressed Sequence Tags
- Female
- Genomic Imprinting/genetics
- Germ Cells/metabolism
- Humans
- Introns/genetics
- KCNQ Potassium Channels
- KCNQ1 Potassium Channel
- Long Interspersed Nucleotide Elements/genetics
- Mice
- Molecular Sequence Data
- Multigene Family/genetics
- Nuclear Proteins/genetics
- Placenta/metabolism
- Potassium Channels/genetics
- Potassium Channels, Voltage-Gated
- Receptors, Steroid/chemistry
- Receptors, Steroid/genetics
- Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor/chemistry
- Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor/genetics
- Sequence Alignment
- Sequence Analysis, DNA
- Sulfates/metabolism
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Engemann
- Max-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Genetik, Ihnestrasse 73, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Constância M, Dean W, Lopes S, Moore T, Kelsey G, Reik W. Deletion of a silencer element in Igf2 results in loss of imprinting independent of H19. Nat Genet 2000; 26:203-6. [PMID: 11017078 DOI: 10.1038/79930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 156] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Igf2 and H19 are closely linked, reciprocally imprinted genes on mouse distal chromosome 7. The paternally expressed Igf2 encodes a potent fetal growth factor and the maternally expressed H19 encodes a non-coding RNA (refs 1,2). Shared endoderm-specific enhancers 3' to H19 are necessary for transcription of the maternal copy of H19 and the paternal copy of Igf2 (ref. 3), a chromatin boundary upstream of H19 preventing access of the enhancers to the maternal Igf2 promoters. Mesoderm-specific control elements have not been identified, and the role of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in Igf2 has not been addressed. Two DMRs in Igf2 are methylated on the active paternal allele, suggesting that they contain silencers. Here we have deleted the DMR1 region in Igf2. Maternal transmission of the deletion results in biallelic expression of Igf2 in most mesodermally derived tissues without altering H19 imprinting or expression. Paternal or maternal transmission leads to continued postnatal transcription of Igf2, in contrast to the wild-type allele, which is silenced soon after birth. These results reveal a mesodermal silencer, which may be regulated by methylation and which has a major role in H19-independent expression and imprinting control of Igf2. Our results establish a new mechanistic principle for imprinted genes whereby epigenetically regulated silencers interact with enhancers to control expression, and suggest a new mechanism for loss of imprinting (LOI) of Igf2, which may be important in a number of diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Constância
- Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, Developmental Genetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Babraham, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Paulsen M, El-Maarri O, Engemann S, Strödicke M, Franck O, Davies K, Reinhardt R, Reik W, Walter J. Sequence conservation and variability of imprinting in the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome gene cluster in human and mouse. Hum Mol Genet 2000; 9:1829-41. [PMID: 10915772 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/9.12.1829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In human and mouse most imprinted genes are arranged in chromosomal clusters. This linked organization suggests coordinated mechanisms controlling imprinted expression. We have sequenced 250 kb in the centre of the mouse imprinting cluster on distal chromosome 7 and compared it with the orthologous Beckwith-Wiedemann gene cluster on human chromosome 11p15.5. This first comparative imprinting cluster analysis revealed a high structural and functional conservation of the six orthologous genes identified. However, several striking differences were also discovered. First, compared with the mouse the human sequence is approximately 40% longer, mostly due to insertions of two large repetitive clusters. One of these clusters encompasses an additional gene coding for a homologue of the ribosomal protein L26. Second, pronounced blocks of unique direct repeats characteristic of imprinted genes were only found in the human sequence. Third, two of the orthologous gene pairs Tssc4/TSSC4 and Ltrpc5/LTRPC5 showed apparent differences in imprinting between human and mouse, whereas others like Tssc6/TSSC6 were not imprinted in either organism. Together these results suggest a significant functional and structural variability in the centre of the imprinting cluster. Some genes escape imprinting in both organisms whereas others exhibit tissue- and species-specific imprinting. Hence the control of imprinting in the cluster appears to be a highly dynamic process under fast evolutionary adaptation. Intriguingly, whereas imprinted genes within the cluster contain CpG islands the non-imprinted Ltrpc5 and Tssc6/TSSC6 do not. This and additional comparisons with other imprinted and non-imprinted regions suggest that CpG islands are key features of imprinted domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Paulsen
- Max-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Genetik, Ihnestrabetae 73, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Reik W, Constancia M, Dean W, Davies K, Bowden L, Murrell A, Feil R, Walter J, Kelsey G. Igf2 imprinting in development and disease. Int J Dev Biol 2000; 44:145-50. [PMID: 10761859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Igf2 is one of the first imprinted genes discovered and occupies a centre stage in the study of imprinting. This is because it has dramatic effects on the control of fetal growth, it is involved in growth disorders and in cancer, it interacts with products of other imprinted genes, and its imprinting status is under complex regulation in a cluster of tightly linked imprinted genes. Here we review briefly the key features of Igf2 imprinting in normal development and in disease, and hope to show what a fascinating subject of study this gene and its biology provides.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Reik
- Developmental Genetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
|
37
|
Abstract
DNA methylation is essential for the control of a number of biological mechanisms in mammals [1]. Mammalian development is accompanied by two major waves of genome-wide demethylation and remethylation: one during germ-cell development and the other after fertilisation [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. Most previous studies have suggested that the genome-wide demethylation observed after fertilisation occurs passively, that is, by the lack of maintenance methylation following DNA replication and cell division [6] [7], although one other study has reported that replication-independent demethylation may also occur during early embryogenesis [8]. Here, we report that genes that are highly methylated in sperm are rapidly demethylated in the zygote only hours after fertilisation, before the first round of DNA replication commences. By contrast, the oocyte-derived maternal alleles are unaffected by this reprogramming. They either remain methylated after fertilisation or become further methylated de novo. These results provide the first direct evidence for active demethylation of single-copy genes in the mammalian zygote and, moreover, reveal a striking asymmetry in epigenetic methylation reprogramming. Whereas paternally (sperm)-derived sequences are exposed to putative active demethylases in the oocyte cytoplasm, maternally (oocyte)-derived sequences are protected from this reaction. These results, whose generality is supported by findings of Mayer et al. [9], have important implications for the establishment of biparental genetic totipotency after fertilisation, the establishment and maintenance of genomic imprinting, and the reprogramming of somatic cells during cloning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Oswald
- Max Planck Institut für Molekulare Genetik, Berlin, 14195, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Catchpoole D, Smallwood AV, Joyce JA, Murrell A, Lam W, Tang T, Munroe D, Reik W, Schofield PN, Maher ER. Mutation analysis of H19 and NAP1L4 (hNAP2) candidate genes and IGF2 DMR2 in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. J Med Genet 2000; 37:212-5. [PMID: 10777363 PMCID: PMC1734547 DOI: 10.1136/jmg.37.3.212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
39
|
Affiliation(s)
- E R Maher
- Section of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
|
41
|
Smilinich NJ, Day CD, Fitzpatrick GV, Caldwell GM, Lossie AC, Cooper PR, Smallwood AC, Joyce JA, Schofield PN, Reik W, Nicholls RD, Weksberg R, Driscoll DJ, Maher ER, Shows TB, Higgins MJ. A maternally methylated CpG island in KvLQT1 is associated with an antisense paternal transcript and loss of imprinting in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96:8064-9. [PMID: 10393948 PMCID: PMC22188 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.14.8064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 327] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Loss of imprinting at IGF2, generally through an H19-independent mechanism, is associated with a large percentage of patients with the overgrowth and cancer predisposition condition Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS). Imprinting control elements are proposed to exist within the KvLQT1 locus, because multiple BWS-associated chromosome rearrangements disrupt this gene. We have identified an evolutionarily conserved, maternally methylated CpG island (KvDMR1) in an intron of the KvLQT1 gene. Among 12 cases of BWS with normal H19 methylation, 5 showed demethylation of KvDMR1 in fibroblast or lymphocyte DNA; whereas, in 4 cases of BWS with H19 hypermethylation, methylation at KvDMRl was normal. Thus, inactivation of H19 and hypomethylation at KvDMR1 (or an associated phenomenon) represent distinct epigenetic anomalies associated with biallelic expression of IGF2. Reverse transcription-PCR analysis of the human and syntenic mouse loci identified the presence of a KvDMR1-associated RNA transcribed exclusively from the paternal allele and in the opposite orientation with respect to the maternally expressed KvLQT1 gene. We propose that KvDMR1 and/or its associated antisense RNA (KvLQT1-AS) represents an additional imprinting control element or center in the human 11p15.5 and mouse distal 7 imprinted domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N J Smilinich
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lam WW, Hatada I, Ohishi S, Mukai T, Joyce JA, Cole TR, Donnai D, Reik W, Schofield PN, Maher ER. Analysis of germline CDKN1C (p57KIP2) mutations in familial and sporadic Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) provides a novel genotype-phenotype correlation. J Med Genet 1999; 36:518-23. [PMID: 10424811 PMCID: PMC1734395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) is a human imprinting disorder with a variable phenotype. The major features are anterior abdominal wall defects including exomphalos (omphalocele), pre- and postnatal overgrowth, and macroglossia. Additional less frequent complications include specific developmental defects and a predisposition to embryonal tumours. BWS is genetically heterogeneous and epigenetic changes in the IGF2/H19 genes resulting in overexpression of IGF2 have been implicated in many cases. Recently germline mutations in the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor gene CDKN1C (p57KIP2) have been reported in a variable minority of BWS patients. We have investigated a large series of familial and sporadic BWS patients for evidence of CDKN1C mutations by direct gene sequencing. A total of 70 patients with classical BWS were investigated; 54 were sporadic with no evidence of UPD and 16 were familial from seven kindreds. Novel germline CDKN1C mutations were identified in five probands, 3/7 (43%) familial cases and 2/54 (4%) sporadic cases. There was no association between germline CDKN1C mutations and IGF2 or H19 epigenotype abnormalities. The clinical phenotype of 13 BWS patients with germline CDKN1C mutations was compared to that of BWS patients with other defined types of molecular pathology. This showed a significantly higher frequency of exomphalos in the CDKN1C mutation cases (11/13) than in patients with an imprinting centre defect (associated with biallelic IGF2 expression and H19 silencing) (0/5, p<0.005) or patients with uniparental disomy (0/9, p<0.005). However, there was no association between germline CDKN1C mutations and risk of embryonal tumours. No CDKN1C mutations were identified in six non-BWS patients with overgrowth and Wilms tumour. These findings (1) show that germline CDKN1C mutations are a frequent cause of familial but not sporadic BWS, (2) suggest that CDKN1C mutations probably cause BWS independently of changes in IGF2/H19 imprinting, (3) provide evidence that aspects of the BWS phenotype may be correlated with the involvement of specific imprinted genes, and (4) link genotype-phenotype relationships in BWS and the results of murine experimental models of BWS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W W Lam
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Petrik J, Pell JM, Arany E, McDonald TJ, Dean WL, Reik W, Hill DJ. Overexpression of insulin-like growth factor-II in transgenic mice is associated with pancreatic islet cell hyperplasia. Endocrinology 1999; 140:2353-63. [PMID: 10218989 DOI: 10.1210/endo.140.5.6732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
We have used an insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-II transgenic mouse model in which mouse IGF-II is widely overexpressed, resulting in increased fetal size and selective organ overgrowth, to investigate the effects on the development of the endocrine pancreas. Fetuses examined on day 19.5-20 of gestation had significantly elevated circulating levels of IGF-II, compared with control mice. The pancreatic islets in transgenic animals were of irregular shape and had a mean area five times greater than in controls, whereas the mean number of islets per tissue section was not altered. The size of individual endocrine cells was not altered. Although the islets in animals expressing the IGF-II transgene were considerably larger, immunohistochemistry for insulin and glucagon showed that the relative proportion of beta-cells was significantly less, and that of alpha-cells was higher. Normal islet morphology was disrupted, with alpha-cells appearing in small groups within the islets, as well as on the periphery, whereas beta-cells were often seen at the edge of the islets. Twice as many islet cells (21.9% vs. 11.4%) were involved in cell replication, detected by the presence of immunoreactive proliferating cell nuclear antigen, in pancreata from transgenic mice vs. controls, whereas the number of cells undergoing apoptosis was significantly reduced. Abundant IGF-II messenger RNAwas found within the islets of transgenic animals by in situ hybridization, and the relative area of islets demonstrating immunoreactive IGF-II was significantly greater. Immunoreactive IGF-I was much less abundant and was further reduced in islets of transgenic animals. The area of islets immunopositive for IGF binding protein-2 was unaltered. Despite the presence of islet hyperplasia, circulating insulin levels and serum glucose levels were not significantly different between transgenic and control mice. These results show that an overexpression of IGF-II in fetal life has a profound effect on islet morphology and causes islet hyperplasia while reducing the attrition of islet cells by apoptosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Petrik
- Lawson Research Institute, St. Joseph's Health Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
A number of recent studies have provided new insights into mechanisms that regulate genomic imprinting in the mammalian genome. Regions of allele-specific differential methylation (DMRs) are present in all imprinted genes examined. Differential methylation is erased in germ cells at an early stage of their development, and germ-line-specific methylation imprints in DMRs are reestablished around the time of birth. After fertilization, differential methylation is retained in core DMRs despite genome-wide demethylation and de novo methylation during preimplantation and early postimplantation stages. Direct repeats near CG-rich DMRs may be involved in the establishment and maintenance of allele-specific methylation patterns. Imprinted genes tend to be clustered; one important component of clustering is enhancer competition, whereby promoters of linked imprinted genes compete for access to enhancers. Regional organization and spreading of the epigenotype during development is also important and depends on DMRs and imprinting centers. The mechanism of cis spreading of DNA methylation is not known, but precedent is provided by the Xist RNA, which results in X chromosome inactivation in cis. Reading of the somatic imprints could be carried out by transcription factors that are sensitive to methylation, or by methyl-cytosine-binding proteins that are involved in transcriptional repression through chromatin remodeling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Constância
- Programme in Developmental Genetics, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Paulsen M, Davies KR, Bowden LM, Villar AJ, Franck O, Fuermann M, Dean WL, Moore TF, Rodrigues N, Davies KE, Hu RJ, Feinberg AP, Maher ER, Reik W, Walter J. Syntenic organization of the mouse distal chromosome 7 imprinting cluster and the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome region in chromosome 11p15.5. Hum Mol Genet 1998; 7:1149-59. [PMID: 9618174 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/7.7.1149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
In human and mouse, most imprinted genes are arranged in chromosomal clusters. Their linked organization suggests co-ordinated mechanisms controlling imprinting and gene expression. The identification of local and regional elements responsible for the epigenetic control of imprinted gene expression will be important in understanding the molecular basis of diseases associated with imprinting such as Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. We have established a complete contig of clones along the murine imprinting cluster on distal chromosome 7 syntenic with the human imprinting region at 11p15.5 associated with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. The cluster comprises approximately 1 Mb of DNA, contains at least eight imprinted genes and is demarcated by the two maternally expressed genes Tssc3 (Ipl) and H19 which are directly flanked by the non-imprinted genes Nap1l4 (Nap2) and Rpl23l (L23mrp), respectively. We also localized Kcnq1 (Kvlqt1) and Cd81 (Tapa-1) between Cdkn1c (p57(Kip2)) and Mash2. The mouse Kcnq1 gene is maternally expressed in most fetal but biallelically transcribed in most neonatal tissues, suggesting relaxation of imprinting during development. Our findings indicate conserved control mechanisms between mouse and human, but also reveal some structural and functional differences. Our study opens the way for a systematic analysis of the cluster by genetic manipulation in the mouse which will lead to animal models of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and childhood tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Paulsen
- Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Dean W, Bowden L, Aitchison A, Klose J, Moore T, Meneses JJ, Reik W, Feil R. Altered imprinted gene methylation and expression in completely ES cell-derived mouse fetuses: association with aberrant phenotypes. Development 1998; 125:2273-82. [PMID: 9584126 DOI: 10.1242/dev.125.12.2273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 286] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
In vitro manipulation of preimplantation mammalian embryos can influence differentiation and growth at later stages of development. In the mouse, culture of embryonic stem (ES) cells affects their totipotency and may give rise to fetal abnormalities. To investigate whether this is associated with epigenetic alterations in imprinted genes, we analysed two maternally expressed genes (Igf2r, H19) and two paternally expressed genes (Igf2, U2af1-rs1) in ES cells and in completely ES cell-derived fetuses. Altered allelic methylation patterns were detected in all four genes, and these were consistently associated with allelic changes in gene expression. All the methylation changes that had arisen in the ES cells persisted on in vivo differentiation to fetal stages. Alterations included loss of methylation with biallelic expression of U2af1-rs1, maternal methylation and predominantly maternal expression of Igf2, and biallelic methylation and expression of Igf2r. In many of the ES fetuses, the levels of H19 expression were strongly reduced, and this biallelic repression was associated with biallellic methylation of the H19 upstream region. Surprisingly, biallelic H19 repression was not associated with equal levels of Igf2 expression from both parental chromosomes, but rather with a strong activation of the maternal Igf2 allele. ES fetuses derived from two of the four ES lines appeared developmentally compromised, with polyhydramnios, poor mandible development and interstitial bleeding and, in chimeric fetuses, the degree of chimerism correlated with increased fetal mass. Our study establishes a model for how early embryonic epigenetic alterations in imprinted genes persist to later developmental stages, and are associated with aberrant phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Dean
- Laboratory of Developmental Genetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Hall, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Imprinting is a genetic mechanism that determines expression or repression of genes according to their parental origin. Some imprinted genes occur in clusters in the genome. Recent work using transgenic mice shows that multiple cis-acting sequences are needed for correct imprinting. Mutation analysis in a normal chromosomal context reveals the importance of imprinting centres for regional establishment or maintenance of imprinting in a cluster. Elements that contribute to the function of imprinting centres and regional propagation of the imprints are CpG-rich differentially methylated regions (that during development retain germline imposed methylation or demethylation), direct repeat clusters, and unusual RNAs (antisense, non-translated etc.). The interaction of these cis elements with transacting factors such as methylase and chromatin factors establishes a hierarchical control system with local and regional effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Reik
- Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
Genomic imprinting in mammals results in the unequal expression of the two parental alleles of specific genes. The existence of imprinting in the mouse emerged from nuclear transplantation studies and from the abnormal phenotypes associated with uniparental inheritance of particular chromosome segments. Over the past 5 years, 20 or so imprinted genes have been identified. This has emphasized the important roles played by some imprinted genes in development, permitted a description of the epigenetic properties associated with imprinting, and provided the first insights into the regulation of imprinting. In this article, we discuss the generation of experimental material in which imprinting effects can be analyzed, review the properties of imprinted genes, and discuss how to examine them using state-of-the-art techniques. Finally, we consider the means by which new imprinted genes can be identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Kelsey
- Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Moore T, Constancia M, Zubair M, Bailleul B, Feil R, Sasaki H, Reik W. Multiple imprinted sense and antisense transcripts, differential methylation and tandem repeats in a putative imprinting control region upstream of mouse Igf2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997; 94:12509-14. [PMID: 9356480 PMCID: PMC25020 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.23.12509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 204] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The mouse insulin-like growth factor 2 (Igf2) locus is a complex genomic region that produces multiple transcripts from alternative promoters. Expression at this locus is regulated by parental imprinting. However, despite the existence of putative imprinting control elements in the Igf2 upstream region, imprinted transcriptional repression is abolished by null mutations at the linked H19 locus. To clarify the extent to which the Igf2 upstream region contains autonomous imprinting control elements we have performed functional and comparative analyses of the region in the mouse and human. Here we report the existence of multiple, overlapping imprinted (maternally repressed) sense and antisense transcripts that are associated with a tandem repeat in the mouse Igf2 upstream region. Regions flanking the repeat exhibit tissue-specific parental allelic methylation patterns, suggesting the existence of tissue-specific control elements in the upstream region. Studies in H19 null mice indicate that both parental allelic methylation and monoallelic expression of the upstream transcripts depends on an intact H19 gene acting in cis. The homologous region in human IGF2 is structurally conserved, with the significant exception that it does not contain a tandem repeat. Our results support the proposal that tandem repeats act to target methylation to imprinted genetic loci.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Moore
- Department of Development and Genetics, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB2 4AT, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
The gene IGF2, which encodes a fetal insulin-like growth factor, is imprinted, so only one of two parental copies of the gene is expressed. The altered expression of IGF2 has been implicated in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, a human fetal overgrowth syndrome, which is characterized by overgrowth of several organs and an increased risk of developing childhood tumours. We have introduced Igf2 transgenes into the mouse genome by using embryonic stem cells, which leads to transactivation of the endogenous Igf2 gene. The consequent overexpression of Igf2 results in most of the symptoms of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, including prenatal overgrowth, polyhydramnios, fetal and neonatal lethality, disproportionate organ overgrowth including tongue enlargement, and skeletal abnormalities. These phenotypes establish Igf2 overexpression as a key determinant of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F L Sun
- Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, Department of Development and Genetics, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|