Time to rethink management strategies in asymptomatic carotid artery disease

Treatment Strategies for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the safety and efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA), carotid stenting (CAS), and optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

METHODS

Relevant randomized controlled trials were researched with PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. Fixed-effects model and random-effects model were used to estimate the relative risks and the hazard ratios (HRs). The results of the probabilistic analysis were reported as surfaces under the cumulative ranking curve.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials were included. Data from 10 348 patients (CEA: n = 4758; CAS: n = 3919; OMT: n = 1673) were evaluated. Compared with the previous OMT, CEA, CAS, and the current OMT (c-OMT) were all effective in reducing the risk of stroke (CEA: HR, 0.52; CI, 0.40-0.66; CAS: HR, 0.58; CI, 0.42-0.81; c-OMT: HR, 0.40; CI, 0.15-0.94); CEA and CAS reduced the risk of ipsilateral stroke (CEA: HR, 0.41; CI, 0.28-0.59; CAS: HR, 0.51; CI, 0.31-0.84), and the risk of fatal or disabling stroke (CEA: HR, 0.59; CI, 0.43-0.81; CAS: HR, 0.57; CI, 0.34-0.95). Regarding reducing the risk of stroke, only CEA was statistically significant in patients with any degree of stenosis compared with the previous medical treatment (<80%: HR, 0.48; CI, 0.33%-0.70%; 80%-99%: HR, 0.53; CI, 0.38-0.73).

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis, the perioperative outcomes of CAS were similar to that of CEA; CEA, CAS, and c-OMT shared similar long-term outcomes; and CEA and CAS may be more effective in patients with high levels of asymptomatic stenosis.

Carotid Stenosis and Stroke: Historical Perspectives Leading to Current Challenges

The carotid artery is unique; it is the only vessel to bifurcate into a bulb larger than itself. The history of its anatomic description, understanding of its pathophysiology and evolution of its imaging are relevant to current controversies regarding measurement of stenosis, surgical/endovascular therapies and medical management of carotid stenosis in stroke prevention. Treatment decisions on millions of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients are routinely based on information from clinical trials from over 30 years ago. This article briefly summarizes the highlights of past research in key areas and discuss how they led to current challenges of diagnosis and treatment.

MR Imaging of Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis: Updated Evidence on High-Risk Plaque Features and Emerging Trends

MR imaging is well-established as the criterion standard for carotid artery atherosclerosis imaging. The capability of MR imaging to differentiate numerous plaque components has been demonstrated, including those features that are associated with a high risk of sudden changes, thrombosis, or embolization. The field of carotid plaque MR imaging is constantly evolving, with continued insight into the imaging appearance and implications of various vulnerable plaque characteristics. This article will review the most up-to-date knowledge of these high-risk plaque features on MR imaging and will delve into 2 major emerging topics: the role of vulnerable plaques in cryptogenic strokes and the potential use of MR imaging to modify carotid endarterectomy treatment guidelines.

Optimal Management of Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Management of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS), including carotid endarterectomy (CEA), carotid artery stenting (CAS), and best medical treatment (BMT), remains inconsistent in current practice. Early studies reported a benefit of CEA vs. BMT; however, the current risk-benefit profile of invasive therapy lacks consensus. By evaluating the effects of modern BMT vs. invasive intervention on patient outcomes, this study aimed to influence the future management of ACAS.

METHODS

A systematic review and series of network meta-analyses were performed assessing peri-operative (within 30 days) and long term (30 days - 5 years) stroke and mortality risk between ACAS interventions. Total stroke, major, minor, ipsilateral, and contralateral stroke subtypes were assessed independently. Traditional (pre-2000) and modern (post-2000) BMT were compared to assess clinical improvements in medical therapy over the previous two decades. Risks of myocardial infarction (MI) and cranial nerve injury (CNI) were also assessed.

RESULTS

Seventeen reports of 14 310 patients with > 50% ACAS were included. CEA reduced the odds of a peri-operative stroke event occurring vs. CAS (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 - 2.2 [0 - 20 fewer/1 000]). CEA and CAS reduced the long term odds of minor strokes (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.21 - 0.59 [20 fewer/1 000]) and ipsilateral strokes (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.19 - 0.39 [30 fewer/1 000]) vs. all BMT. CEA reduced the odds of major strokes and combined stroke and mortality vs. traditional BMT; however, no difference was found between CEA and modern BMT. CAS reduced the odds of peri-operative MI (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0. 26 - 0.91) and CNI (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01 - 0.42) vs. CEA.

CONCLUSION

Modern BMT demonstrates similar reductions in major stroke, combined stroke, and mortality to CEA. The overall risk reductions are low and data were unavailable to assess subgroups which may benefit from intervention. However, BMT carries the potential to reduce the requirement for surgical intervention in patients with ACAS.

Monocyte Phenotypes and Physical Activity in Patients with Carotid Atherosclerosis

Atherosclerosis is associated with low-grade inflammation involving circulating monocytes. It has been shown that the levels of intermediate pro-inflammatory monocytes are associated with cardiovascular mortality and risk of ischemic stroke. It also has been shown that physical activity (PA) decreases inflammation markers, incidence of strokes, and mortality. In this cross-sectional study, we tested the effect of PA on circulating monocytes phenotype rate. A total of 29 patients with a carotid stenosis > 50% were recruited. Levels of physical activity (MET.min/week) were measured by the GPAQ questionnaire, arterial samples of blood were collected to analyze monocyte phenotype (classical, intermediate and non-classical) assessed by flow cytometry, and venous blood samples were used to dose antioxidant activity and oxidative damage. Antioxidant capacity was reduced and oxidative damage increased in patients. There was a significant decrease in the percentage of classical and intermediate monocytes in moderately active patients as compared with non-active and highly active patients. Inversely, the rate of non-classical monocytes increased in moderately active patients. Intense PA appears to blunt the beneficial effects of moderate PA. Our study also suggests that PA could be beneficial in such patients by reducing the rate of intermediate monocytes known to predict the risk of ischemic stroke and by increasing the non-classical monocytes involved in lesions’ healing. Nevertheless, a longitudinal study would be necessary to confirm this hypothesis.

The 2nd European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST-2): rationale and protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing immediate revascularisation versus optimised medical therapy alone in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis at low to intermediate risk of stroke

Background

Carotid endarterectomy is currently recommended for patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50%, based on randomised trials conducted 30 years ago. Several factors such as carotid plaque ulceration, age and associated comorbidities might influence the risk-benefit ratio of carotid revascularisation. A model developed in previous trials that calculates the future risk of stroke based on these features can be used to stratify patients into low, intermediate or high risk. Since the original trials, medical treatment has improved significantly. Our hypothesis is that patients with carotid stenosis ≥50% associated with a low to intermediate risk of stroke will not benefit from additional carotid revascularisation when treated with optimised medical therapy. We also hypothesise that prediction of future risk of stroke in individual patients with carotid stenosis can be improved using the results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the carotid plaque.

Methods

Patients are randomised between immediate revascularisation plus OMT versus OMT alone. Suitable patients are those with asymptomatic or symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50% with an estimated 5-year risk of stroke of <20%, as calculated using the Carotid Artery Risk score. MRI of the brain at baseline and during follow-up will be used as a blinded measure to assess the incidence of silent infarction and haemorrhage, while carotid plaque MRI at baseline will be used to investigate the hypotheses that plaque characteristics determine future stroke risk and help identify a subgroup of patients that will benefit from revascularisation. An initial analysis will be conducted after recruitment of 320 patients with baseline MRI and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, to provide data to inform the design and sample size for a continuation or re-launch of the study. The primary outcome measure of this initial analysis is the combined 2-year rate of any clinically manifest stroke, new cerebral infarct on MRI, myocardial infarction or periprocedural death.

Discussion

ECST-2 will provide new data on the efficacy of modern optimal medical therapy alone versus added carotid revascularisation in patients with carotid stenosis at low to intermediate risk of future stroke selected by individualised risk assessment. We anticipate that the results of baseline brain and carotid plaque MRI will provide data to improve the prediction of the risk of stroke and the effect of treatment in patients with carotid stenosis.

Trial registration

ISRCTN registry ISRCTN97744893. Registered on 05 July 2012

Development of Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tools for Longitudinal Tracking of Carotid Atherosclerotic Disease Using Fast Imaging with Steady-State Precession

Identification of patients with high-risk asymptomatic carotid plaques remains a challenging but essential step in stroke prevention. Current selection criteria for intervention in carotid disease are still determined by symptomatology and degree of luminal stenosis. This strategy has been less effective in identifying the high-risk asymptomatic individual patients. Inflammation is the key factor that drives plaque instability causing clinical sequelae. Currently, there is no imaging tool in routine clinical practice to assess the inflammatory status within atherosclerotic plaques. Herein we describe the development of a novel molecular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) strategy to interrogate plaque inflammation, and hence its vulnerability in vivo, using dual-targeted iron particle-based probes and fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) sequence, adding further prognostic information to luminal stenosis alone. A periarterial cuff was used to generate high-risk plaques at specific timepoints and location of the carotid artery in an apolipoprotein-E-deficient mouse model. Using this platform, we demonstrated that in vivo dual-targeted iron particles with enhanced FISP can (i) target and characterise high-risk vulnerable plaques and (ii) quantitatively report and track the inflammatory activity within carotid plaques longitudinally. This molecular imaging tool may permit (i) accurate monitoring of the risk of carotid plaques and (ii) timely identification of high-risk asymptomatic patients for prophylactic carotid intervention, achieving early stroke prevention.

Extra-Cranial Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Objective Analysis of the Available Evidence

Background and Purpose

Carotid stenosis is arterial disease narrowing of the origin of the internal carotid artery (main brain artery). Knowing how to best manage this is imperative because it is common in older people and an important cause of stroke. Inappropriately high expectations have grown regarding the value of carotid artery procedures, such as surgery (endarterectomy) and stenting, for lowering the stroke risk associated with carotid stenosis. Meanwhile, the improving and predominant value of medical intervention (lifestyle coaching and medication) continues to be underappreciated.

Methods and Results

This article aims to be an objective presentation and discussion of the scientific literature critical for decision making when the primary goal is to optimize patient outcome. This compilation follows from many years of author scrutiny to separate fact from fiction. Common sense conclusions are drawn from factual statements backed by original citations. Detailed research methodology is given in cited papers. This article has been written in plain language given the importance of the general public understanding this topic. Issues covered include key terminology and the economic impact of carotid stenosis. There is a summary of the evidence-base regarding the efficacy and safety of procedural and medical (non-invasive) interventions for both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Conclusions are drawn with respect to current best management and research priorities. Several "furphies" (misconceptions) are exposed that are commonly used to make carotid stenting and endarterectomy outcomes appear similar. Ongoing randomized trials are mentioned and why they are unlikely to identify a routine practice indication for carotid artery procedures. There is a discussion of relevant worldwide guidelines regarding carotid artery procedures, including how they should be improved. There is an outline of systematic changes that are resulting in better application of the evidence-base.

Conclusion

The cornerstone of stroke prevention is medical intervention given it is non-invasive and protects against all arterial disease complications in all at risk. The "big" question is, does a carotid artery procedure add patient benefit in the modern era and, if so, for whom?

Effectiveness of an individualized home-based physical activity program in surgery-free non-endarterectomized asymptomatic stroke patients: a study protocol for the PACAPh interventional randomized trial

Background

Carotid atherosclerotic plaques remain silent until their rupture, which may lead to detrimental ischemic events such as strokes. This is due, in part, to intraplaque hemorrhages (IPH) and the resulting inflammatory processes, which may promote carotid plaque vulnerability. Currently, the benefits of carotid endarterectomy remain unclear for asymptomatic patients. Interestingly, the completion of physical activity (PA) may have beneficial effects; however, the paucity of current data warrants robust longitudinal interventions. We therefore aim to study the effects of a 6-month longitudinal personalized home-based PA program on IPH, biological, and inflammatory markers in asymptomatic stroke patients.

Methods

Eighty patients (≥ 18 years old) will be recruited for the Physical Activity and Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Hemorrhage (PACAPh) clinical trial from the Hospices Civils de Lyon. Patients will be eligible if they present with carotid stenosis ≥ 50% and are asymptomatic from any ischemic events for at least 6 months. Recruited patients will be randomized into either a PA or a control group, and assessed at baseline and after 6 months. At both time points, all patients will be assessed using magnetic resonance imaging to assess IPH, blood sampling to measure inflammatory markers and monocytic phenotyping, PA and sedentary behavior questionnaires, 6-min walking test, and maximal isometric quadricep contraction test. The randomized PA intervention will consist of reaching a daily walking step goal individually tailored to each patient. Steps will be collected using a wirelessly connected wristband. The number of steps completed by individuals in the PA group will be re-evaluated bimonthly to encourage walking habits.

Discussion

The PACAPh study is the first of its kind representing a feasible, easily accessible therapeutic strategy for asymptomatic stroke patients. We hypothesize that the personalized home-based PA program will reduce IPH and modulate inflammatory and biological parameters in patients presenting with carotid plaques. If the results of the PACAPh study prove to be beneficial on such health parameters, the implementation of such kind of intervention in the daily treatment of these patients would be an advantageous and cost-effective practice to adopt globally.

Trial registration

This study has been approved by the National Ethics Committee (IDRCB:2019-A01543-54/SI:19.06.21.40640). ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04053166

Impact of the first COVID-19 pandemic peak and lockdown on the interventional management of carotid artery stenosis in France

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the trends of carotid revascularization (endarterectomy (CEA), transfemoral stenting (TFCAS)) for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis before, during and after the end of the first lockdown in 2020 in France.

METHODS

Nationwide data were provided by the French National Hospital Discharge database (Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information). We retrospectively analyzed patients admitted for CEA or TFCAS in all French public and private hospitals during a nine-month period (January-September) in 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020. Procedures were identified using the French Common Classification of Medical Procedures. Stenoses were considered symptomatic in the presence of stroke and/or transient ischemic attack codes (according to the International Classification of Diseases-Tenth Revision) during the stay, and asymptomatic in the absence of these codes. Hospitalization rates in 2020 were compared with the rates in the same period in the three previous years.

RESULTS

Between January and September 2020, 12 546 patients were hospitalized for carotid artery surgery (CEA and TFCAS) in France. Compared with the three previous years, there was a decline in hospitalization rates for asymptomatic (-68.9%) and symptomatic (-12.6%) CEA procedures in April, starting at the pandemic peak concomitant with the first national lockdown. This decrease was significant for asymptomatic CEA (p<0.001). After the lockdown, while CEA for asymptomatic stenosis returned to usual activity, CEA for symptomatic stenosis presented a significant rebound, up 18.52% in August compared with previous years. Lockdown also had consequences on TFCAS procedures, with fewer interventions for both asymptomatic (-60.53%) and symptomatic stenosis (-16.67%) in April.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a severe drop for all interventions during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in France. However, the trends in the post-lockdown period were different for the various procedures. These data can be used to anticipate future decisions and organization for cardiovascular care.

Intraoperative completion studies in carotid endarterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of techniques and outcomes

Background

Declining perioperative stroke and death rates over the past 3 decades have been paralleled by an increasing use of intraoperative completion studies (ICS) following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Techniques applied include angiography, intraoperative duplex ultrasound (IDUS), flowmetry, and angioscopy. This systematic review and meta-analysis is aiming on providing an overview of techniques and corresponding outcomes.

Methods

A PubMed based systematic literature review comprising the years 1980 through 2020 was performed using predefined keywords to identify articles on different ICS techniques. Pooled analyses and meta-analyses estimating risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed to compare outcomes of different ICS modes to nonapplication of any ICS. I² values were assessed to quantify study heterogeneities.

Results

Identification of 34 studies including patients undergoing CEA with angiography (n=53,218), IDUS (n=20,030), flowmetry (n=16,812), and angioscopy (n=2,291). Corresponding rates of perioperative stroke were 1.5%, 1.8%, 3.6%, and 1.5%, perioperative stroke or death occurred in 1.7%, 1.9%, 2.2%, and 2.0%. Intraoperative surgical revision rates were 6.2%, 5.9%, and 7.9% after CEA with angiography, IDUS, and angioscopy, respectively. Compared to nonapplication of any ICS, the pooled analysis revealed angiography to be significantly associated with lower rates of stroke (RR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.36–0.62; P<0.0001) and stroke or death (RR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70–0.83; P<0.0001). IDUS was significantly associated with lower rates of stroke (RR 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43–0.73; P<0.0001) and stroke or death (RR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74–0.93; P=0.0018), whereas angioscopy showed a significant association with a lower stroke rate (RR 0.48; 95% CI, 0.033–0.68; P=0.0001), but no effect on the combined stroke or death rate. Angioscopy was associated with a higher intraoperative revision rate compared to angiography (RR 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07–1.54; P=0.006). The meta-analyses confirmed lower perioperative stroke or death rates for angiography (RR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76–0.91) and IDUS (RR 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76–0.98) compared to non-application of any ICS, whereas flowmetry showed no significant association.

Conclusions

This study represents the first systematic literature review and meta-analysis on usage of ICSs in CEA. Data strongly indicate a significant beneficial effect of angiography, IDUS, and angioscopy on perioperative CEA outcomes. Any carotid surgeon should consider implementation of ICSs in his routine armamentarium.

Roadmap Consensus on Carotid Artery Plaque Imaging and Impact on Therapy Strategies and Guidelines: An International, Multispecialty, Expert Review and Position Statement

Current guidelines for primary and secondary prevention of stroke in patients with carotid atherosclerosis are based on the quantification of the degree of stenosis and symptom status. Recent publications have demonstrated that plaque morphology and composition, independent of the degree of stenosis, are important in the risk stratification of carotid atherosclerotic disease. This finding raises the question as to whether current guidelines are adequate or if they should be updated with new evidence, including imaging for plaque phenotyping, risk stratification, and clinical decision-making in addition to the degree of stenosis. To further this discussion, this roadmap consensus article defines the limits of luminal imaging and highlights the current evidence supporting the role of plaque imaging. Furthermore, we identify gaps in current knowledge and suggest steps to generate high-quality evidence, to add relevant information to guidelines currently based on the quantification of stenosis.

Management of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis may need to be individualized: a multidisciplinary call for action. Republication of J Stroke 2021;23:202-212

The optimal management of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) is the subject of extensive debate. According to the 2017 European Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines, carotid endarterectomy should (Class IIa; Level of Evidence: B) or carotid artery stenting may be considered (Class IIb; Level of Evidence: B) in the presence of one or more clinical/imaging characteristics that may be associated with an increased risk of late ipsilateral stroke (e.g. silent embolic infarcts on brain computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, progression in the severity of ACS, a history of contralateral transient ischemic attack/stroke, microemboli detection on transcranial Doppler, etc.), provided documented perioperative stroke/death rates are <3% and the patient's life expectancy is >5 years. Besides these clinical/imaging characteristics, there are additional individual, ethnic/racial or social factors that should probably be evaluated in the decision process regarding the optimal management of these patients, such as individual patient needs/patient choice, patient compliance with best medical treatment, patient sex, culture, race/ethnicity, age and comorbidities, as well as improvements in imaging/operative techniques/outcomes. The present multispecialty position paper will present the rationale why the management of patients with ACS may need to be individualized.

Establishing a carotid artery stenosis disease cohort for comparative effectiveness research using natural language processing

OBJECTIVE

Investigation of asymptomatic carotid stenosis treatment is hindered by the lack of a contemporary population-based disease cohort. We describe the use of natural language processing (NLP) to identify stenosis in patients undergoing carotid imaging.

METHODS

Adult patients with carotid imaging between 2008 and 2012 in a large integrated health care system were identified and followed through 2017. An NLP process was developed to characterize carotid stenosis according to the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (for ultrasounds) and North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) (for axial imaging) guidelines. The resulting algorithm assessed text descriptors to categorize normal/non-hemodynamically significant stenosis, moderate or severe stenosis as well as occlusion in both carotid ultrasound (US) and axial imaging (computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography [CTA/MRA]). For US reports, internal carotid artery systolic and diastolic velocities and velocity ratios were assessed and matched for laterality to supplement accuracy. To validate the NLP algorithm, positive predictive value (PPV or precision) and sensitivity (recall) were calculated from simple random samples from the population of all imaging studies. Lastly, all non-normal studies were manually reviewed for confirmation for prevalence estimates and disease cohort assembly.

RESULTS

A total of 95,896 qualifying index studies (76,276 US and 19,620 CTA/MRA) were identified among 94,822 patients including 1059 patients who underwent multiple studies on the same day. For studies of normal/non-hemodynamically significant stenosis arteries, the NLP algorithm showed excellent performance with a PPV of 99% for US and 96.5% for CTA/MRA. PPV/sensitivity to identify a non-normal artery with correct laterality in the CTA/MRA and US samples were 76.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74.1%-79.5%)/93.1% (95% CI, 91.1%-94.8%) and 74.7% (95% CI, 69.3%-79.5%)/94% (95% CI, 90.2%-96.7%), respectively. Regarding cohort assembly, 15,522 patients were identified with diseased carotid artery, including 2674 exhibiting equal bilateral disease. This resulted in a laterality-specific cohort with 12,828 moderate, 5283 severe, and 1895 occluded arteries and 326 diseased arteries with unknown stenosis. During follow-up, 30.1% of these patients underwent 61,107 additional studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of NLP to detect carotid stenosis or occlusion can result in accurate exclusion of normal/non-hemodynamically significant stenosis disease states with more moderate precision with lesion identification, which can substantially reduce the need for manual review. The resulting cohort allows for efficient research and holds promise for similar reporting in other vascular diseases.

Prevalence of High-risk Plaques and Risk of Stroke in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Meta-analysis

Importance

There is an ongoing debate regarding the management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Previous studies have reported imaging features of high-risk plaques that could help to optimize the risk-benefit ratio of revascularization. However, such studies have not provided an accurate estimate of the prevalence of high-risk plaques and the associated annual incidence of ipsilateral ischemic cerebrovascular events to inform the design of clinical trials using a risk-oriented selection of patients before randomization.

Objective

To assess the relevance and feasibility of risk-oriented selection of patients for revascularization.

Data Sources

A systematic search of PubMed and Ovid Embase from database inception to July 31, 2019, was performed.

Study Selection

Prospective observational studies that reported prevalence of high-risk plaques and incidence of ipsilateral ischemic cerebrovascular events were included.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Aggregated data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Data were analyzed from December 16, 2019, to January 15, 2020.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Prevalence of high-risk plaques and annual incidence of ipsilateral ischemic events.

Results

Overall, 64 studies enrolling 20 751 participants aged 29 to 95 years (mean age range, 55.0-76.5 years; proportion of men, 45%-87%) were included in the meta-analysis. Among all participants, the pooled prevalence of high-risk plaques was 26.5% (95% CI, 22.9%-30.3%). The most prevalent high-risk plaque features were neovascularization (43.4%; 95% CI, 31.4%-55.8%) in 785 participants, echolucency (42.3%; 95% CI, 32.2%-52.8%) in 12 364 participants, and lipid-rich necrotic core (36.3%; 95% CI, 27.7%-45.2%) in 3728 participants. The overall incidence of ipsilateral ischemic cerebrovascular events was 3.2 events per 100 person-years (22 cohorts with 10 381 participants; mean follow-up period, 2.8 years; range, 0.7-6.5 years). The incidence of ipsilateral ischemic cerebrovascular events was higher in patients with high-risk plaques (4.3 events per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 2.5-6.5 events per 100 person-years) than in those without high-risk plaques (1.2 events per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 0.6-1.8 events per 100 person-years), with an odds ratio of 3.0 (95% CI, 2.1-4.3; I2 = 48.8%). In studies focusing on severe stenosis (9 cohorts with 2128 participants; mean follow-up period, 2.8 years; range, 1.4-6.5 years), the incidence of ipsilateral ischemic cerebrovascular events was 3.7 events per 100 person-years (95% CI, 1.9-6.0 events per 100 person-years). The incidence of ipsilateral ischemic cerebrovascular events was also higher in patients with high-risk plaques (7.3 events per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 2.0-15.0 events per 100 person-years) than in those without high-risk plaques (1.7 events per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 0.6-3.3 events per 100 person-years), with an odds ratio of 3.2 (95% CI, 1.7-5.9; I2 = 39.6%).

Conclusions and Relevance

High-risk plaques are common in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis, and the associated risk of an ipsilateral ischemic cerebrovascular event is higher than the currently accepted estimates. Extension of routine assessment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis beyond the grade of stenosis may help improve risk stratification and optimize therapy.

Management of Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis May Need to Be Individualized: A Multidisciplinary Call for Action

The optimal management of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) is the subject of extensive debate. According to the 2017 European Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines, carotid endarterectomy should (Class IIa; Level of Evidence: B) or carotid artery stenting may be considered (Class IIb; Level of Evidence: B) in the presence of one or more clinical/imaging characteristics that may be associated with an increased risk of late ipsilateral stroke (e.g., silent embolic infarcts on brain computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, progression in the severity of ACS, a history of contralateral transient ischemic attack/stroke, microemboli detection on transcranial Doppler, etc.), provided documented perioperative stroke/death rates are <3% and the patient’s life expectancy is >5 years. Besides these clinical/imaging characteristics, there are additional individual, ethnic/racial or social factors that should probably be evaluated in the decision process regarding the optimal management of these patients, such as individual patient needs/patient choice, patient compliance with best medical treatment, patient sex, culture, race/ethnicity, age and comorbidities, as well as improvements in imaging/operative techniques/outcomes. The present multispecialty position paper will present the rationale why the management of patients with ACS may need to be individualized.

Stroke Prevention: Little-Known and Neglected Aspects

Combining available therapies has the potential to reduce the risk of stroke by 80% or more. A comprehensive review of all aspects of stroke prevention would be very lengthy; in this narrative review, we focus on some aspects of stroke prevention that are little-known and/or neglected. These include the following: (1) implementation of a Mediterranean diet; (2) B vitamins to lower homocysteine; (3) coordinated approaches to smoking cessation; (4) intensive lipid-lowering therapy; (5) lipid lowering in the elderly; (6) physiologically individualized therapy for hypertension based on renin/aldosterone phenotyping; (7) avoiding excessive blood pressure reduction in patients with stiff arteries; (8) treatment of insulin resistance with pioglitazone in stroke patients with prediabetes and diabetes; (9) impaired activation of clopidogrel in patients with variants of CYP2C19; (10) aspirin pseudoresistance due to enteric coating; (11) rationale for anticoagulation in patients with embolic stroke of unknown source; (12) pharmacologic properties of direct-acting oral anticoagulants that should be considered when choosing among them; (13) the identification of which patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis are at a high enough risk to benefit from carotid endarterectomy or stenting; and (14) the importance of age in choosing between endarterectomy and stenting. Stroke prevention could be improved by better recognition of these issues and by implementation of the principles derived from them.

Editor's Choice - Distribution of Care and Hospital Incidence of Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting: A Secondary Analysis of German Hospital Episode Data

OBJECTIVE

This is a description of the German healthcare landscape regarding carotid artery disease, assessment of hospital incidence time courses for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS), and simulation of potential effects of minimum hospital caseload requirements for CEA and CAS.

METHODS

The study is a secondary data analysis of diagnosis related group statistics data (2005-2016), provided by the German Federal Statistical Office. Cases encoded by German operation procedure codes for CEA or CAS and by International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes for carotid artery disease were included. Hospitals were categorised into quartiles according to annual caseloads. Linear distances to the closest hospital fulfilling hypothetical caseload requirements were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 132 411 and 33 709 patients treated with CEA and CAS from 2012 to 2016 were included. CEA patients had lower rates of myocardial infarction (1.4% vs. 1.8%) and death (1.2% vs. 4.0%), and CAS patients were more often treated after emergency admission (38.1% vs. 27.1%). Age standardised annual hospital incidences were 67.2 per 100 000 inhabitants for CEA and 16.3 per 100 000 inhabitants for CAS. The incidence for CEA declined from 2005 to 2016, with CAS rising again until 2016 after having declined from 2010 to 2013. Regarding distance from home to hospital, centres offering CEA are distributed more homogeneously across Germany, compared with those performing CAS. Hypothetical introduction of minimum annual caseloads (> 20 for CEA; > 10 for CAS) imply that 75% of the population would reach their hospital after travelling 45 km for CEA and 70 km for CAS.

CONCLUSION

Differences in spatial distribution mean that statutory minimum annual caseloads would have a greater impact on CAS accessibility than CEA in Germany. Presumably because of a decline in carotid artery disease and a transition towards individualised therapy for asymptomatic patients, hospital incidence for CEA has been declining.

Optimal Medical Management of Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) due to atherosclerosis is a risk factor for ipsilateral ischemic cerebrovascular events and cognitive impairment. The prognosis of ACS has improved over the past 4 decades due largely to improvements in medical management. Most patients with ACS can be managed without revascularization, but some patients with vulnerable plaque should be considered for revascularization. Regardless of the decision to refer for revascularization, all patients with ACS should receive intensive medical management. This includes lifestyle modification (Mediterranean diet, exercise, and smoking cessation) and pharmacological therapy (antiplatelets, lipid-lowering agents, blood pressure reduction, and glycemic control). Patients with ACS often have atherosclerosis in other critical locations, and thus optimal medical therapy is likely to reduce events outside the carotid arteries. The nature of optimal medical therapy is described.

Carotid intraplaque haemorrhage: pathogenesis, histological classification, imaging methods and clinical value

Vulnerable carotid atherosclerotic plaques are characterised by several risk factors, such as inflammation, neovascularization and intraplaque haemorrhage (IPH). Vulnerable plaques can lead to ischemic events such as stroke. Many studies reported a relationship between IPH, plaque rupture, and ischemic stroke. Histology is the gold standard to evaluate IPH, but it required carotid endarterectomy (CEA) surgery to collect the tissue sample. In this context, several imaging methods can be used as a non-invasive way to evaluate plaque vulnerability and detect IPH. Most imaging studies showed that IPH is associated with plaque vulnerability and stroke, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) being the most sensitive and specific to detect IPH as a predictor of ischemic events. These conclusions are however still debated because of the limited number of patients included in these studies; further studies are required to better assess risks associated with different IPH stages. Moreover, IPH is implicated in plaque vulnerability with other risk factors which need to be considered to predict ischemic risk. In addition, MRI sequences standardization is required to compare results from different studies and agree on biomarkers that need to be considered to predict plaque rupture. In these circumstances, IPH detection by MRI could be an efficient clinical method to predict stroke. The goal of this review article is to first describe the pathophysiological process responsible for IPH, its histological detection in carotid plaques and its correlation with plaque rupture. The second part will discuss the benefits and limitations of imaging the carotid plaque, and finally the clinical interest of imaging IPH to predict plaque rupture, focusing on MRI-IPH.

Motion synchronisation patterns of the carotid atheromatous plaque from B-mode ultrasound

Asynchronous movement of the carotid atheromatous plaque from B-mode ultrasound has been previously reported, and associated with higher risk of stroke, but not quantitatively estimated. Based on the hypothesis that asynchronous plaque motion is associated with vulnerable plaque, in this study, synchronisation patterns of different tissue areas were estimated using cross-correlations of displacement waveforms. In 135 plaques (77 subjects), plaque radial deformation was synchronised by approximately 50% with the arterial diameter, and the mean phase shift was 0.4 s. Within the plaque, the mean phase shifts between the displacements of the top and bottom surfaces were 0.2 s and 0.3 s, in the radial and longitudinal directions, respectively, and the synchronisation about 80% in both directions. Classification of phase-shift-based features using Random Forests yielded Area-Under-the-Curve scores of 0.81, 0.79, 0.89 and 0.90 for echogenicity, symptomaticity, stenosis degree and plaque risk, respectively. Statistical analysis showed that echolucent, high-stenosis and high-risk plaques exhibited higher phase shifts between the radial displacements of their top and bottom surfaces. These findings are useful in the study of plaque kinematics.

A promising tool to tackle the risk of cerebral vascular disease, the emergence of novel carotid wall imaging

Stroke is a heterogeneous vascular disease. Carotid artery atherosclerosis is associated with almost one-quarter of ischemic strokes. Moreover, a large percentage of preventable strokes are currently attributed to carotid atherosclerosis. Over the past three decades, the management of carotid artery disease has evolved. The benefits of carotid revascularization alongside medical therapy have early been recognized. Nonetheless, the debate regarding the optimal strategy is still ongoing, particularly in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery disease. One of the challenges is the use of luminal stenosis to quantify the severity of the carotid artery disease and to guide decision-making regarding invasive revascularization. Characterizing carotid atherosclerotic plaque is a promising tool to identify vulnerable plaque. Certain features such as large lipid core have already been linked to acute vascular events, not only at the plaque level but also to predict systemic cardiovascular events. Recently, a quantitative T2 mapping magnetic resonance imaging technique was developed and validated against histology. The ability to accurately quantify plaque lipid content using this technique opens several new opportunities. In this review articles, we will discuss the current challenges in the management of carotid artery disease and the future roles of T2 mapping to aid therapeutic options. These roles may include how to determine the mode of invasive carotid revascularization in symptomatic patients. Moreover, there may be a rational to use T2 mapping as a risk stratification tool in asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis. It may also provide an opportunity to stage atherosclerosis and identify patients with coronary atherosclerosis who may benefit maximally from intensive lipid interventions.

Innovative Multiparametric Characterization of Carotid Plaque Vulnerability by Ultrasound

Objective

The degree of stenosis of a carotid plaque is a well-established risk factor for ischemic stroke. Nevertheless, the risk of ipsilateral stroke in asymptomatic carotid stenosis remains low and new imaging markers are needed to better target which patients would benefit most from endarterectomy or intensive medical therapy. Ultrafast ultrasound imaging offers parameters helping at characterizing the carotid plaque by shear wave elastography and Ultrafast Doppler (UFD). We aimed at using these techniques to characterize 3 different ultrasound biomarkers: plaque stiffness heterogeneity, wall shear stress (WSS) and intraplaque micro-flows and to correlate these biomarkers with findings on computed tomography angiography (CTA) and the pathological examination.

Methods

We present the case of a multimodal evaluation of a carotid plaque using ultrasound. Elastography has been coupled to the WSS assessment and the detection of intraplaque micro-flows by UFD. The data have been compared to CTA and to the pathology examination of the tissue after carotid endarterectomy.

Results

Elastography allowed at identifying stiff areas corresponding to calcifications, as well as a soft area corresponding to an intraplaque hemorrhage. The flow evaluation with UFD showed an increase of the WSS along the plaque and identified the presence of a plaque rupture, confirmed by the pathologist.

Conclusion

Ultrafast ultrasound imaging is an innovative, easily accessible technique that provides imaging modalities on top of the conventional B-mode. Ultrafast ultrasound biomarkers such as plaque stiffness heterogeneity, WSS and intraplaque micro-flows could help to define the vulnerability of the carotid plaque in order to stratify patients that could benefit most from endarterectomy or intensive medical therapy.

Rationale for screening selected patients for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Approximately 15% of all first-ever strokes occur due to atheroembolism from a previously undetected/untreated asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS). Despite that, international guidelines do not recommend screening for ACS. The rationale for not recommending screening include: (a) the harm associated with screening, (b) the questionable clinical benefit associated with surgery, (c) the lack of proven reduction in the risk of stroke, (d) the large number of false positive/false negative tests, and (e) the cost-effectiveness of such screening programs. A critical analysis of each of these arguments is presented. Patients with ACS have a very high risk of all-cause and cardiac mortality. Detection of ACS should not be viewed as an indication for surgery, but rather as an opportunity to implement best medical treatment (BMT) and lifestyle changes to prevent not only strokes, but also cardiac events. The implementation of screening programs for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) has led to a considerable reduction in the number of ruptured AAAs and AAA-related deaths. Similarly, screening high-risk individuals for ACS would enable timely identification of patients with ACS and implementation of BMT and lifestyle measures to prevent future strokes and cardiac events.

Choosing the right therapy for a patient with asymptomatic carotid stenosis

Introduction: Most patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) now have a lower risk with intensive medical therapy than with stenting (CAS) or endarterectomy (CEA); the annual risk of stroke or death with intensive medical therapy is ~ 0.5%, vs. a periprocedural risk with CAS of ~ 2.5-4.1% with CAS, and ~ 1.4-1.8% with CEA. The excess risk of CAS is greater in older patients.Areas covered: Discussed are the need for intensive medical therapy, the nature of intensive medical therapy, approaches to identifying the few patients with ACS who could benefit from CEA or CAS, and which patients would be better suited to CEA vs. CAS.Expert opinion: All patients with ACS are at high risk of cardiovascular events, soshould receive intensive medical therapy including lifestyle modification, intensive lipid-lowering, B vitamins to lower homocysteine (using methylcobalamin rather than cyanocobalamin), and appropriate antithrombotic therapy. High-risk patients who could benefit from intervention can be identified by clinical and imaging features including transcranial Doppler embolus detection, ulceration, intraplaque hemorrhage, reduced cerebrovascular reserve, plaque echolucency, silent infarction on brain imaging, and progression of stenosis. Most patients whose risk of stroke warrants intervention would be better treated with CEA than with CAS.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound perfusion patterns and serum lipid signatures of vulnerable carotid artery plaque in predicting stroke: A cohort study of carotid stenosis in Chinese patients

BACKGROUND

Early identification of vulnerable plaques at risk of rupture could help prevent cerebral ischemic stroke in patients with carotid artery disease.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the correlation between contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) perfusion patterns and serum lipid signatures of carotid artery plaques with the degree of carotid stenosis.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients with carotid artery plaques who underwent CEUS were included. All patients underwent CEUS, computed tomography angiography or digital subtraction angiography, and serum lipid testing.

RESULTS

The contrast agent enhancement levels and the CEUS perfusion patterns in the plaques were associated with the degree of carotid stenosis (P < 0.05). Serum free fatty acid (FFA) was associated with the contrast agent enhancement levels (P < 0.05), but did not correlate with the degree of stenosis (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides with respect to contrast agent enhancement levels (P > 0.05) or the degree of stenosis (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A high level of CEUS perfusion and increased serum FFA levels are indicative of vulnerable carotid plaques, which may be useful for the prediction of stroke in patients with carotid artery disease.

Does Quantification of Carotid Plaque Surface Irregularities Better Detect Symptomatic Plaques Compared to the Subjective Classification?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the interobserver agreement of color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for quantification of carotid plaque surface irregularities and to correlate objective and subjective measures with stroke occurrence.

METHODS

This work was an observational study involving 54 patients with 62 internal carotid artery or carotid bulb plaques (31 symptomatic) undergoing CDUS and CEUS between February 2016 and February 2018, with retrospective interpretation of prospectively acquired data. Plaques were included if causing moderate (50%-69%) or severe (70%-99%) stenosis based on velocity criteria, and their surface was classified as smooth, irregular, or ulcerated based on CEUS. The surface irregularities were quantified in the form of a surface irregularity index by 2 observers, based on CDUS and CEUS. The surface irregularity index was evaluated for interobserver agreement with CDUS and CEUS and correlated with the occurrence of stroke, as was the subjective characterization of the plaque surface.

RESULTS

Color Doppler ultrasound and CEUS showed good interobserver agreement (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.979 and 0.952, respectively). Plaques were characterized as smooth in 30.6% of cases, irregular in 50%, and ulcerated in 19.4%. The subjective classification of the plaque surface did not correlate with stroke occurrence (P > .05, χ² ). Surface irregularity index values were significantly higher for symptomatic plaques with both CDUS and CEUS (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Color Doppler ultrasound and CEUS can quantify carotid plaque surface irregularities with good interobserver agreement. The resulting quantitative measure was significantly higher in symptomatic plaques, whereas the subjective characterization of plaque surface failed to differ between symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques.

Changing Patterns of Carotid Endarterectomy Between 2011 and 2017 in England

Background and Purpose—

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) reduces the risk of stroke in recently symptomatic patients and less so in asymptomatic patients. Recent evidence suggests that the number of CEAs may be declining. The aim of this study was to investigate annual patterns of CEA in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients in England from 2011 to 2017.

Methods—

Data from the National Vascular Registry were used to describe (1) the number of CEA procedures in England and its 9 geographic regions from 2011 to 2017, (2) the characteristics of patients undergoing CEA, and (3) whether rates of CEA correlated with the number of vascular arterial units within each region. Annual stroke incidence for each region was derived from official population figures and the number of index stroke admissions per year.

Results—

The overall number of CEAs performed in England fell from 4992 in 2011 to 3482 in 2017, a 30% decline. Among symptomatic patients, there was a 25% decline, the number of CEAs falling from 4270 to 3217. In asymptomatic patients, there were 722 CEAs performed in 2011 and 265 in 2017, a 63% decline. CEAs per 100 000 adults within all regions declined over time but the size of change varied across the regions (range, 1.7–5.5 per 100 000). The regional numbers of CEAs per year were associated with changes in the regional stroke incidence, the proportion of CEAs performed in asymptomatic patients, and the number of hospitals performing CEA.

Conclusions—

This population-based study revealed a 63% decline in CEAs among asymptomatic patients between 2011 and 2017, possibly because of changing attitudes in the role of CEA. Reasons for the 25% decline in CEAs among symptomatic patients are unclear as UK guidelines on CEA have not changed for these patients. Whether the proportion of symptomatic patients with 50% to 99% ipsilateral stenosis has changed requires investigation.

[Predictors of long-term complications after carotid endarterectomy]

AIM

To analyze the predictors of complications within 3 years after carotid endarterectomy (CEE).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 1035 patients after CEE for the period 2011-2016. Long-term follow-up period was 42.4±18.6 months (≈ 3.5 years). The endpoints were such unfavorable cardiovascular events as death, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischemic attack, redo revascularization. Statistical analysis was carried out by using of Statistica for Windows 8.0 software package (StatSoft Inc., USA). Stepwise logistic regression was applied to identify risk factors of adverse outcomes and death in long-term postoperative period.

RESULTS

Comprehensive analysis of numerous factors (anamnestic, instrumental-diagnostic, surgical) allowed us to identify predictors of long-term unfavorable outcomes in patients with occlusive-stenotic lesions of carotid arteries. Risk factors of long-term complications were SYNTAX score ≥33 (high risk), unstable plaque in the contralateral ICA, occlusion of contralateral ICA, LVEF <39%, ICA cross-clamping >40 min, previous CABG.

CONCLUSION

These data are extremely important and can be used to create prognostic models. The last ones are necessary to determine optimal treatment strategy in patients with occlusive-stenotic lesions of supra-aortic vessels.

Combining morphological and biomechanical factors for optimal carotid plaque progression prediction: An MRI-based follow-up study using 3D thin-layer models

Plaque progression prediction is of fundamental significance to cardiovascular research and disease diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Magnetic resonance image (MRI) data of carotid atherosclerotic plaques were acquired from 20 patients with consent obtained. 3D thin-layer models were constructed to calculate plaque stress and strain. Data for ten morphological and biomechanical risk factors were extracted for analysis. Wall thickness increase (WTI), plaque burden increase (PBI) and plaque area increase (PAI) were chosen as three measures for plaque progression. Generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) with 5-fold cross-validation strategy were used to calculate prediction accuracy and identify optimal predictor. The optimal predictor for PBI was the combination of lumen area (LA), plaque area (PA), lipid percent (LP), wall thickness (WT), maximum plaque wall stress (MPWS) and maximum plaque wall strain (MPWSn) with prediction accuracy = 1.4146 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value is 0.7158), while PA, plaque burden (PB), WT, LP, minimum cap thickness, MPWS and MPWSn was the best for WTI (accuracy = 1.3140, AUC = 0.6552), and a combination of PA, PB, WT, MPWS, MPWSn and average plaque wall strain (APWSn) was the best for PAI with prediction accuracy = 1.3025 (AUC = 0.6657). The combinational predictors improved prediction accuracy by 9.95%, 4.01% and 1.96% over the best single predictors for PAI, PBI and WTI (AUC values improved by 9.78%, 9.45%, and 2.14%), respectively. This suggests that combining both morphological and biomechanical risk factors could lead to better patient screening strategies.

Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) for Identification of Unstable Plaques in Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis

OBJECTIVE

Neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9/NGAL complex were investigated in asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis including gender specific differences aiming at vulnerable plaques prone to embolisation.

METHODS

Serum NGAL and MMP-9/NGAL levels were analysed in 83 patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Pre-operative ultrasound and post-endarterectomy histology of carotid atherosclerotic lesions were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients with vulnerable plaques, as determined by ultrasound (plaques with decreased echogenicity) and histological analysis (type VI according to the classification of the American Heart Association), displayed the highest levels of NGAL and MMP-9/NGAL complex (p = .0003 and p = .0078, respectively). Grade VI plaques were primarily detected in patients with "soft" plaques (12 type VI plaques in 25 patients), but also in patients with mixed (four of 19) and calcified (three of 39) plaques according to ultrasound. Higher grade carotid artery stenosis (≥90%) was not associated with elevated NGAL levels. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis detecting grade VI lesions yields an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.85, with respect to soft plaque on ultrasound the AUC = 0.86. There were no gender specific differences in levels of NGAL 80.9 (37.7) ng/mL in women vs. 76.7 (36.3) ng/mL in men, p = .607) nor of MMP-9/NGAL 33.0 (18.2-55.5) ng/mL in women vs. 36.7 (20.2-54.0) ng/mL in men, p = .969. Likewise, there were no gender associated differences in vulnerable plaque characteristics: either for grade VI plaques (17.9% vs. 27.3%, p = .582) or for the presence of soft plaques as evaluated by ultrasound (35.9% vs. 25%, p = .503).

CONCLUSION

Circulating NGAL and MMP-9/NGAL are significantly increased in asymptomatic patients with vulnerable carotid atherosclerotic plaques independent of gender. Accordingly, serum NGAL may be proposed as a valuable biomarker for the detection of unstable carotid plaques in asymptomatic patients, who can then be selected for early carotid endarterectomy or stenting.

Contemporary prevalence of carotid stenosis in patients presenting with ischaemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Carotid stenosis is a common cause of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack (TIA). Despite rising recognition and centralization of stroke services there has been a decline in interventions for carotid stenosis in recent years. The aim of this study was to determine the current prevalence and management of carotid stenosis in the UK.

METHODS

This was a 1-year prospective observational study of consecutive patients presenting with ischaemic stroke, TIA or ischaemic retinal artery occlusion to a central London hyperacute stroke unit. Patients with significant carotid stenosis, defined as atherosclerotic narrowing of 50 per cent or greater, underwent multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion to determine the cause of stroke/TIA and classify carotid stenosis as symptomatic or incidental.

RESULTS

In total, 2707 patients were seen; half had an ischaemic event and the majority had carotid imaging (1252 of 1444). Carotid stenosis of at least 50 per cent was seen in 238 (prevalence 19·0 (95 per cent c.i. 16·6 to 21·4) per cent). Patients with significant carotid stenosis were more likely to have hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes and ischaemic heart disease. Carotid stenosis was deemed symptomatic in 99 patients (7·9 (6·3 to 9·5) per cent); of these, 17 had carotid occlusion, 17 were unfit for surgery and 58 patients were referred for carotid intervention. Among 139 patients with asymptomatic stenosis, 75 had carotid stenosis ipsilateral to the stroke but, after MDT discussion, the cause was deemed to be atrial fibrillation (32), small-vessel disease (15), another determined cause (5), or not determined owing to atypical imaging or clinical presentation.

CONCLUSION

Carotid stenosis is common, affecting one in five patients presenting with stroke or TIA. Careful MDT discussion may avoid unnecessary intervention and should be the standard of care.

Interoperator Reproducibility of Carotid Elastography for Identification of Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaques

Ultrasound-based carotid elastography has been developed to evaluate the vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaques. The aim of this study was to investigate the in vivo interoperator reproducibility of carotid elastography for the identification of vulnerable plaques, with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as reference. Ultrasound radio-frequency data of 45 carotid arteries (including 53 plaques) from 32 volunteers were acquired separately by two experienced operators in the longitudinal view and then were used to estimate the interframe axial strain rate (ASR) with a two-step optical flow method. The maximum 99th percentile of absolute ASR of all plaques in a carotid artery was used as the elastographic index. MRI scanning was also performed on each volunteer to identify the vulnerable plaque. The results showed no systematic bias in the Bland-Altman plot and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.66 between the two operators. In addition, no statistical significance was found between the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from the two operators ( ), and their areas under the ROC curves were 0.83 and 0.77, respectively. Using the mean measurements of the two operators as the classification criterion, a sensitivity of 71.4%, a specificity of 87.1%, and an accuracy of 82.2% were obtained with a cutoff value of 1.37 [Formula: see text]. This study validates the interoperator reproducibility of ultrasound-based carotid elastography for identifying vulnerable carotid plaques.

Characterization and Natural History of Patients with Internal Carotid Occlusion: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

To characterize patients with internal carotid occlusion (ICO) with respect to demographic data, associated diseases, medical management, and risk factors and to compare these patients with those with nonsignificant stenosis (NSS; less than 50% stenosis). Secondary end points were new neurologic events, progression of contralateral degree of stenosis, cardiovascular symptoms, and death during follow-up.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed using data collected from clinical records and added to a prospective database. Missing data were obtained during phone interviews or requested medical appointments.

RESULTS

From 2005 to 2013, 213 patients with ICO and 172 with NSS were studied (medium follow-up 37.81 months). Among the patients with ICO, a greater proportion were men, had a history of smoking, and presented with peripheral arterial disease and a lower creatinine clearance compared with those with NSS (P < 0.05). At the time of diagnosis, 76.1% of the patients with ICO were symptomatic compared with 35.5% of those with NSS (P = 0.000001). The patients in the ICO group exhibited significant progression of contralateral stenosis compared with those in the control group with progression on any side (15.0% vs. 2.3%, P = 0.00011). In addition, 18 patients in the ICO group (8.5%) exhibited new neurological symptoms compared with 13 (7.6%) in the NSS group (P = 0.41). When the ICO and NSS groups were combined, 10.8% of the initially symptomatic patients presented with new symptoms compared with 4.3% of those who were initially asymptomatic (P = 0.0218). The number of deaths was significantly higher among the patients in the ICO group (14.1% vs. 6.4%, P = 0.0150).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients presenting with ICO have more risk factors and higher mortality by any cause. Initially, symptomatic patients will likely present with more neurological symptoms during follow-up, independent of carotid morphology, ICO, or NSS. Efforts must be made to identify those at risk before occlusion and to prevent secondary events and death.

Recent Advances in Primary and Secondary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Stroke

Atherosclerosis is a major cause of ischemic stroke that can be effectively prevented with appropriate lifestyle modifications and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Medical advances in recent years along with aggressive cardiovascular risk factor modifications have resulted in decreased recurrence rates of atherosclerotic stroke. Non-statin lipid-lowering molecules have recently shown clinical benefit and are recommended for very high-risk patients to reduce their risk of stroke. Aggressive hypertension treatment is crucial to reduce atherosclerotic stroke risk. Advances in antithrombotic treatments include combinations of antiplatelets and new antiplatelet agents in the acute phase post-stroke, which carries a high risk of recurrence. Intensive medical treatment has also limited the indications for carotid interventions, especially for asymptomatic disease. Intracranial atherosclerotic disease may provoke stroke through various mechanisms; it is increasingly recognized as a cause of ischemic stroke with advanced imaging and is best managed with lifestyle modifications and medical therapy. The diagnostic search for the vulnerable culprit atherosclerotic plaque is an area of intense research, from the level of the intracranial arteries to that of the aortic arch. Ultrasonography and novel magnetic resonance imaging techniques (high-resolution vessel-wall imaging) may assist in the identification of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques as the underlying cause in cryptogenic or misdiagnosed non-atherosclerotic ischemic stroke. Vertebrobasilar atherosclerotic disease is less common than carotid artery disease; thus, high-quality data on effective prevention strategies are scarcer. However, aggressive medical treatment is also the gold standard to reduce cerebrovascular disease located in posterior circulation.

Imaging vulnerable plaques by targeting inflammation in atherosclerosis using fluorescent-labeled dual-ligand microparticles of iron oxide and magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVE

Identification of patients with high-risk asymptomatic carotid plaques remains an elusive but essential step in stroke prevention. Inflammation is a key process in plaque destabilization and a prelude to clinical sequelae. There are currently no clinical imaging tools to assess the inflammatory activity within plaques. This study characterized inflammation in atherosclerosis using dual-targeted microparticles of iron oxide (DT-MPIO) as a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) probe.

METHODS

DT-MPIO were used to detect and characterize inflammatory markers, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1). and P-selectin on (1) tumor necrosis factor-α-treated cells by immunocytochemistry and (2) aortic root plaques of apolipoprotein-E deficient mice by in vivo MRI. Furthermore, apolipoprotein E-deficient mice with focal carotid plaques of different phenotypes were developed by means of periarterial cuff placement to allow in vivo molecular MRI using these probes. The association between biomarkers and the magnetic resonance signal in different contrast groups was assessed longitudinally in these models.

RESULTS

Immunocytochemistry confirmed specificity and efficacy of DT-MPIO to VCAM-1 and P-selectin. Using this in vivo molecular MRI strategy, we demonstrated (1) the DT-MPIO-induced magnetic resonance signal tracked with VCAM-1 (r = 0.69; P = .014), P-selectin (r = 0.65; P = .022), and macrophage content (r = 0.59; P = .045) within aortic root plaques and (2) high-risk inflamed plaques were distinguished from noninflamed plaques in the murine carotid artery within a practical clinical imaging time frame.

CONCLUSIONS

These molecular MRI probes constitute a novel imaging tool for in vivo characterization of plaque vulnerability and inflammatory activity in atherosclerosis. Further development and translation into the clinical arena will facilitate more accurate risk stratification in carotid atherosclerotic disease in the future.

Surgical and Endovascular Treatment of Extracranial Carotid Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) can be used to prevent stroke due to arteriosclerotic lesions of the carotid artery. In Germany, legally mandated quality assurance (QA) enables the evaluation of outcome quality after CEA and CAS performed under routine conditions.

METHODS

We analyzed data on all elective CEA and CAS procedures performed over the periods 2009-2014 and 2012-2014, respectively. The endpoints of the study were the combined in-hospital stroke and death rate, stroke rate and mortality separately, local complications, and other complications. We analyzed the raw data with descriptive statistics and carried out a risk-adjusted analysis of the association of clinically unalterable variables with the risk of stroke and death. All analyses were performed separately for CEA and CAS.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed from 142 074 CEA procedures (67.8% of them in men) and 13 086 CAS procedures (69.7% in men). The median age was 72 years (CEA) and 71 years (CAS). The periprocedural rate of stroke and death after CEA was 1.4% for asymptomatic and 2.5% for symptomatic stenoses; the corresponding rates for CAS were 1.7% and 3.7%. Variables associated with increased risk included older age, higher ASA class (ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists), symptomatic vs. asymptomatic stenosis, 50-69% stenosis, and contralateral carotid occlusion (for CEA only).

CONCLUSION

These data reveal a low periprocedural rate of stroke or death for both CEA and CAS. This study does however not permit any conclusions as to the superiority or inferiority of CEA and CAS.