Has the SPRINT trial introduced a new blood-pressure goal in hypertension?

Emerging Therapies for Treatment-Resistant Hypertension: A Review of Lorundrostat and Related Selective Aldosterone Synthase Inhibitors

The target-hypertension (Target-HTN) trial investigated the efficacy and safety of lorundrostat, an aldosterone synthase inhibitor, as an antihypertensive. Cohort 1 of the trial includes patients with suppressed plasma renin activity and elevated aldosterone levels. Lorundrostat doses of 100 mg and 50 mg daily significantly decreased systolic blood pressure compared to the placebo group. Cohort 2 also demonstrated a reduction in systolic blood pressure with the 100 mg daily dose of lorundrostat. Lorundrostat is more selective for the inhibition of CYP11B2 versus CYP11B1, which makes it preferable to other aldosterone synthase inhibitors that inhibit cortisol synthesis, such as osilodrostat. Phase 3 trials are needed to validate the safety and efficacy of lorundrostat, and further research should be performed on other selective aldosterone synthase inhibitors such as baxdrostat, dexfadrostat, and BI 690517.

Applying systems thinking to unravel the mechanisms underlying orthostatic hypotension related fall risk

Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is an established and common cardiovascular risk factor for falls. An in-depth understanding of the various interacting pathophysiological pathways contributing to OH-related falls is essential to guide improvements in diagnostic and treatment opportunities. We applied systems thinking to multidisciplinary map out causal mechanisms and risk factors. For this, we used group model building (GMB) to develop a causal loop diagram (CLD). The GMB was based on the input of experts from multiple domains related to OH and falls and all proposed mechanisms were supported by scientific literature. Our CLD is a conceptual representation of factors involved in OH-related falls, and their interrelatedness. Network analysis and feedback loops were applied to analyze and interpret the CLD, and quantitatively summarize the function and relative importance of the variables. Our CLD contains 50 variables distributed over three intrinsic domains (cerebral, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal), and an extrinsic domain (e.g., medications). Between the variables, 181 connections and 65 feedback loops were identified. Decreased cerebral blood flow, low blood pressure, impaired baroreflex activity, and physical inactivity were identified as key factors involved in OH-related falls, based on their high centralities. Our CLD reflects the multifactorial pathophysiology of OH-related falls. It enables us to identify key elements, suggesting their potential for new diagnostic and treatment approaches in fall prevention. The interactive online CLD renders it suitable for both research and educational purposes and this CLD is the first step in the development of a computational model for simulating the effects of risk factors on falls.

Assessing Usability of Smartwatch Digital Health Devices for Home Blood Pressure Monitoring among Glaucoma Patients

Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness worldwide. Blood pressure (BP) dysregulation is a known risk factor, and home-based BP monitoring is increasingly used, but the usability of digital health devices to measure BP among glaucoma patients is not well studied. There may be particular usability challenges among this group, given that glaucoma disproportionately affects the elderly and can cause visual impairment. Therefore, the goal of this mixed-methods study was to assess the usability of a smart watch digital health device for home BP monitoring among glaucoma patients. Adult participants were recruited and given a smartwatch blood pressure monitor for at-home use. The eHEALS questionnaire was used to determine baseline digital health literacy. After a week of use, participants assessed the usability of the BP monitor and related mobile app using the Post-study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) and the System Usability Scale (SUS), standardized instruments to measure usability in health information technology interventions. Variations in scores were evaluated using ANOVA and open-ended responses about participants' experience were analyzed thematically. Overall, usability scores corresponded to the 80th-84th percentile, although older patients endorsed significantly worse usability based on quantitative scores and additionally provided qualitative feedback describing some difficulty using the device. Usability for older patients should be considered in the design of digital health devices for glaucoma given their disproportionate burden of disease and challenges in navigating digital health technologies, although the overall high usability scores for the device demonstrates promise for future clinical applications in glaucoma risk stratification.

To whom recommend intensive treatment for hypertension?

Arterial hypertension is the main identifiable cardiovascular risk factor, and although the benefit of blood pressure reduction is universally acknowledged, the scientific community has long been divided over the therapeutic blood pressure targets to be reached, also considering the estimated overall cardiovascular risk and the presence of individual risk factors and associated comorbidities. During the last few years, numerous clinical studies and meta-analyses, in particular, the SPRINT study, have been published, demonstrating the advantages of an intensive antihypertensive treatment, over a target blood pressure value (<140/90 mmHg), in the reduction of major cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and all-causes cardiovascular mortality. Stemming from these results the major International Guidelines revisited the therapeutic objectives, recommending blood pressure value <130/80 mmHg for the vast majority of hypertensive patients until the age of 65 and suggesting a reduction of the target also in the elderly. Numerous studies and meta-analyses demonstrated that the reduction of the risk of coronary or cerebral events, and of all-causes cardiovascular mortality, is independent from the baseline value of blood pressure and the individual estimated risk. It has been also demonstrated that an early institution of antihypertensive treatment is associated with a faster realization of the recommended targets, and consequent significant benefits in terms of reduction of the incidence of myocardial infarction, heart failure, and major cardiovascular events, particularly when blood pressure control is achieved during the first 6 months of treatment, and even better during first 3 months. Other studies outlined that combination therapy with two or more drugs, mainly in a single pill configuration, are superior in reaching the recommended therapeutic targets. This is the reason why this strategy is strongly supported by the European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension (ESC/ESH) 2018 Guidelines, specifically the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors [angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and Sartans], in combination with calcium antagonist and/or thiazide diuretics, with the option to add antagonist of mineralcorticoid receptors, when an adequate blood pressure control has not been reached, or other classes of drugs, such as beta-blockers, when specific clinical indications are present, first and foremost ischaemic cardiomyopathy or heart failure. The newly proposed therapeutic goals are particularly important in high-risk patients, such as patients with previous cardiovascular events, diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, and patients older than 65 years of age.

Impact of the SPRINT Trial on Hypertension Management

The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial is the first large prospective randomized controlled trial to demonstrate the benefit of an intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) treatment target (<120 mm Hg) compared to a standard target (<140 mm Hg) in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and all-cause mortality in high-risk hypertensive patients. The impact of SPRINT on hypertension treatment has been large, but major questions remain about the feasibility of achieving the SPRINT intensive SBP target in routine practice, the generalizability of the SPRINT findings to hypertensive populations that were excluded from the trial, and the cost effectiveness of adopting the SPRINT intensive treatment goal. In this review, we discuss the generalizability of SPRINT data to the general population of adults with hypertension and with various comorbidities, the cost effectiveness of intensive SBP-lowering therapy, and the implications of SPRINT for future hypertension guideline development and clinical practice.

[Will the new figures from the AHA/ACC guidelines on the definition and treatment of hypertension in Latin America have an impact?]

Given the fact that new guidelines from the American Heart Association (AHA) and American College of Cardiology (ACC) propose important changes in the definition of hypertension, from equal or greater than 140/90mmHg to equal or greater than 130/80mmHg, major debate has been generated about the diagnostic criteria and the treatment of high blood pressure (HBP). In addition, these guidelines recommend that in order to achieve control of hypertension the goal should be a reading lower than 130/80mmHg. These new figures will significantly increase the amount of individuals considered hypertensive, some of whom will need more medication to achieve the new goal. This paradigm has led to questioning the goal's clinical applicability given the enormous financial burden that would result from treating millions of new hypertensive patients. The academic validity of the AHA-ACC guidelines has also been questioned given the fact that the recommendations emerged basically from results obtained from a single study with important methodological differences compared to the majority of studies carried out previously. Furthermore, its outcomes are inconsistent with those of previous studies. This conflict has led to some scientific institutions, such as the Latin American Society of Hypertension (LASH), continuing to adhere to the previous recommendations.

The new US and European guidelines in hypertension: A multi-dimensional analysis

The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) compared the clinical outcomes between target systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels between 140 and 120 mmHg or lower. Both,the 2017 ACC/AHA and the 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines in hypertension are derived from the SPRINT trial and advise initiation and/or intensification of treatment at lower blood pressure thresholds. The ACC/AHA guidance supersedes the 2014 Eight Joint National Committee guideline (JNC-8) which advised initiation of treatment when the BP was 140/90 mmHg or higher; in adults 60 years or over, the target was 150/90 mmHg. Compared to JNC-8, the new guidelines lower the SBP target by 10 mmHg in patients under age of 60 years, and by 20 mmHg in the elderly. We performed a qualitative multi-dimensional analysis in order to answer two key questions: will the new guidelines deliver the stated benefits? and, will translation to the clinic be simple, risk-free, and affordable? A major investment by national healthcare administrations will be necessary for the initiation and support of this program but this decision can only be justified by a valid expectation of clinical benefit. At this time, a definitive answer is not available and a "wait and see" attitude appears appropriate and reasonable. In the interim, efforts are best directed to the immediate problem of untreated hypertension worldwide.

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor rs5186 Gene Variant Predicts Incident NAFLD and Associated Hypertension: Role of Dietary Fat-Induced Pro-Inflammatory Cell Activation

OBJECTIVES

Hypertension has been linked to the presence and severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) through unclear mechanisms. The gain-of-function rs5186 A1166C variant in angtiotensin receptor type 1 (AGTR1) gene has been linked to hypertension, cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome. We assessed the impact of AGTR1 A1166C variant on NAFLD incidence and severity and on glucose and lipid metabolism and explored the underlying mechanisms.

METHODS

We followed up 314 healthy nonobese, nondiabetic, nonhypertensive, insulin-sensitive participants in a population-based study, characterized for AGTR1 rs5186 A1166C variant, adipokine profile, inflammatory and endothelial dysfunction markers. An independent cohort of 78 biopsy-proven nondiabetic NAFLD patients and controls underwent an oral glucose tolerance test with Minimal Model analysis of glucose homeostasis, and an oral fat tolerance test with measurement of plasma lipoproteins, adipokines, MCP-1, calprotectin, and nuclear factor-κB activation in circulating mononuclear cells.

RESULTS

AGTR1 A1166C polymorphism predicted 9.8-year incident NAFLD (odds ratio: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.26-2.21) and hypertension (odds ratio: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.12-2.63) and 9-year increase in cardiovascular disease risk and endothelial dysfunction markers. In the cross-sectional cohort, AGTR1 C allele carriers had higher insulin resistance. Despite comparable fasting lipid profiles, AGTR1 C allele carriers showed postprandial triglyceride-rich and cholesterol-rich VLDL lipoprotein accumulation, higher resistin, MCP-1 and calprotectin responses and nuclear factor-κB activation in mononuclear cells, and a blunted postprandial adiponectin response to fat, which predicted liver histology, hepatocyte apoptosis activation, insulin resistance, and endothelial dysfunction.

DISCUSSION

AGTR1 A1166C variant affects liver disease, insulin resistance, and endothelial dysfunction in NAFLD, at least in part by modulating adipokine, chemokine, and pro-inflammatory cell activation in response to fat ingestion.

Highlights of ESC/ESH 2018 Guidelines on the Management of Hypertension: What Every Doctor Should Know

This is a review article aiming to make focus on the changes made in the most recent sets of clinical recommendations and indications from European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Society of Hypertension (ESH) guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. In particular, in this article we attempted to focus on the main new elements introduced in order to meet the need of doctors to adhere to guidelines and to provide their patients with the most updated recommendations for the clinical management of hypertension.

Emerging Trends in Clinical Research: With Implications for Population Health and Health Policy

Policy Points: Significant advances in clinical medicine that have broader societal relevance may be less accessible to population health researchers and policymakers because of increased specialization within fields. We describe important recent clinical advances and discuss their broader societal impact. These advances include more expansive strategies for disease prevention, the rise of precision medicine, applications of human microbiome research, and new and highly successful treatments for hepatitis C infection. These recent developments in clinical research raise important issues surrounding health care costs and equitable resource allocation that necessitate an ongoing dialogue among the fields of clinical medicine, population health, and health policy.

CONTEXT

Developments in clinical medicine have important implications for population health, and there is a need for interdisciplinary engagement among clinical medicine, the social sciences, and public health research. The aim of this article is to help bridge the divide between these fields by exploring major recent advances in clinical medicine that have important implications for population health.

METHODS

We reviewed the most cited articles published from 2010 to 2015 in 5 high-impact clinical journals and selected 5 randomized controlled trials and 2 related clinical practice guidelines that are broadly relevant to population health and policy.

FINDINGS

We discuss the following themes: (1) expanding indications for drug therapy and the inherent medicalization of the population as highlighted by studies and clinical guidelines supporting lower blood pressure targets or widespread statin use; (2) the tension in nutritional research between quantifying the impact of isolated nutrients and studying specific foods and dietary patterns, for example, the role of the Mediterranean diet in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease; (3) the issue of high medication costs and the challenge of providing equitable access raised by the development of new and effective treatments for hepatitis C infection; (4) emerging clinical applications of research on the human microbiome as illustrated by fecal transplant to treat Clostridium difficile infections; and (5) the promise and limitations of precision medicine as demonstrated by the rise of novel targeted therapies in oncology.

CONCLUSIONS

These developments in clinical science hold promise for improving individual and population health and raise important questions about resource allocation, the role of prevention, and health disparities.

Personalised Single-Pill Combination Therapy in Hypertensive Patients: An Update of a Practical Treatment Platform

Despite the improvements in the management of hypertension during the last three decades, it continues to be one of the leading causes of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide. Effective and sustained reductions in blood pressure (BP) reduce the incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure and cardiovascular death. However, the proportion of patients who achieve the recommended BP goal (< 140/90 mmHg) is persistently low, worldwide. Poor adherence to therapy, complex therapeutic regimens, clinical inertia, drug-related adverse events and multiple risk factors or comorbidities contribute to the disparity between the potential and actual BP control rate. Previously we published a practical therapeutic platform for the treatment of hypertension based on clinical evidence, guidelines, best practice and clinical experience. This platform provides a personalised treatment approach and can be used to improve BP control and simplify treatment. It uses long-acting, effective and well-tolerated angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) olmesartan, in combination with a calcium channel blocker amlodipine, and/or a thiazide diuretic hydrochlorothiazide. These drugs were selected based on the availability in most European Countries of single-pill, fixed formulations in a wide range of doses for both dual- and triple-drug combinations. The platform approach could be applied to other ARBs or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors available in single-pill, fixed-dose combinations. Here, we present an update, which takes into account the results of the recently published studies and extends the applicability of the platform to common conditions that are often neglected or poorly considered in clinical practice guidelines.