Clinical trials of interventional oncology—moving from efficacy to outcomes

Advancements in the application of ablative therapy and its combination with immunotherapy in anti-cancer therapy

Cancer is a significant health issue impacting humans. Currently, systemic therapies such as chemotherapy have significantly increased the life expectancy of cancer patients. However, some patients are unable to endure systemic treatment due to its significant adverse effects, leading to an increased focus on local therapies including radiation and ablation therapy. Ablation therapy is a precise, low-toxicity, and minimally invasive localized therapy that is increasingly acknowledged by clinicians and cancer patients. Many cancer patients have benefited from it, with some achieving full recovery. Currently, numerous studies have shown that ablation therapy is effective due to its ability to kill cancer cells efficiently and activate the body's anti-cancer immunity. It can also convert "cold cancers" into "hot cancers" and enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy when used in combination. In this article, we categorize ablation therapy into thermal ablation, cryoablation, photodynamic therapy (PDT), irreversible electroporation (IRE), etc. Thermal ablation is further divided into Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (WMA), high-frequency focused ultrasound (HIFU), photothermal therapy (PTT), magnetic heat therapy (MHT), etc. We systematically review the most recent advancements in these ablation therapies that are either currently used in clinic or are anticipated to be used in clinic. Then, we also review the latest development of various ablative therapies combined with immunotherapy, and its future development. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Ablation therapy, an invasive localized treatment, offers an alternative to systemic therapies for cancer patients who cannot tolerate their adverse effects. Its ability to kill cancer cells efficiently and activate anti-cancer immunity. This article reviews recent advancements in ablation therapies, including thermal, cryoablation, PDT, and IRE, and their potential clinical applications, both standalone and in combination with immunotherapy.

Local Tumour Control Following Microwave Ablation: Protocol for the Prospective Observational CIEMAR Study

PURPOSE

Microwave ablation (MWA) is a treatment modality for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). While potentially curative, more information is needed on factors that contribute to long-term local tumour control. The prospective multicentre observational study CIRSE Emprint Microwave Ablation Registry aims to prospectively collect real-world technical data and clinical outcomes on patients treated with MWA in CRLM.

METHODS

Eligible patients are adults with up to 9 local treatment naïve CRLM of ≤ 3 cm completely treatable with either MWA alone or MWA with resection and/or radiotherapy within 8 weeks. Data are collected, at baseline, every 3 months until 12 months, and thereafter every 6 months until the end of the study. The primary outcome measure is local tumour control. Secondary outcome measures are overall survival, (hepatic-) disease-free survival, time-to-progression untreatable by ablation, systemic therapy vacation, safety, and quality of life. Covariates related to the primary outcome measure will be assessed using a stratified log-rank test and an univariable Cox proportional hazard regression. A sample size of 500 patients with 750 lesions produces a two-sided 95% confidence interval with a precision equal to 0.057.

RESULTS

Between September 2019 and December 2022, 500 patients have been enrolled with at least 976 treated tumours.

CONCLUSION

The prospective observational CIEMAR study will provide valuable insights into the real-world use of MWA, helping in the future patient selection and clarifying factors that may contribute to long-term local tumour control.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03775980.

A concise shoulder outcome measure: application of computerized adaptive testing to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Assessment

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures enable quantitative and patient-centric assessment of orthopedic interventions; however, increased use of these forms has an associated burden for patients and practices. We examined the utility of a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) method to reduce the number of questions on the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) instrument.

METHODS

A previously developed ASES CAT system was applied to the responses of 2763 patients who underwent shoulder evaluation and treatment and had answered all questions on the full ASES instrument. Analyses to assess the accuracy of the CAT score in replicating the full-form score included the mean and standard deviation of both groups of scores, frequency distributions of the 2 sets of scores and score differences, Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman assessment of patterns in score differences.

RESULTS

By tailoring questions according to prior responses, CAT reduced the question burden by 40%. The mean difference between CAT and full ASES scores was -0.14, and the scores were within 5 points in 95% of cases (a 12-point difference is considered the threshold for clinical significance) and were clustered around zero. The correlation coefficients were 0.99, and the frequency distributions of the CAT and full ASES scores were nearly identical. The differences between scores were independent of the overall score, and no significant bias for CAT scores was found in either a positive or negative direction.

CONCLUSION

The ASES CAT system lessens respondent burden with a negligible effect on score integrity.

Analysis of a National Programme for Selective Internal Radiation Therapy for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

AIMS

Patients with chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer liver metastases have limited therapeutic options. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) delivers yttrium 90 microspheres as a minimally invasive procedure. This prospective, single-arm, observational, service-evaluation study was part of National Health Service England Commissioning through Evaluation.

METHODS

Patients eligible for treatment had histologically confirmed carcinoma with liver-only/liver-dominant metastases with clinical progression during or following oxaliplatin-based and irinotecan-based chemotherapy. All patients received SIRT plus standard of care. The primary outcome was overall survival; secondary outcomes included safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and liver-specific PFS (LPFS).

RESULTS

Between December 2013 and March 2017, 399 patients were treated in 10 centres with a median follow-up of 14.3 months (95% confidence interval 9.2-19.4). The median overall survival was 7.6 months (95% confidence interval 6.9-8.3). The median PFS and LPFS were 3.0 months (95% confidence interval 2.8-3.1) and 3.7 months (95% confidence interval 3.2-4.3), respectively. During the follow-up period, 143 patients experienced an adverse event and 8% of the events were grade 3.

CONCLUSION

Survival estimates from this pragmatic study show clinical outcomes attainable in the National Health Service comparable with previously published data. This study shows the value of a registry-based commissioning model to aid national commissioning decisions for highly specialist cancer treatments.

Developing a Roadmap for Interventional Oncology

Interventional oncology uses image-guided procedures to enhance cancer care. Today, this specialty plays an increasingly critical role in cancer diagnosis (e.g., biopsy), cancer therapy (e.g., ablation or embolization), and cancer symptom palliation (e.g., nephrostomies or biliary drainages). Although the number of procedures and technical capabilities has improved over the last few years, challenges remain. In this article we discuss the need to advance existing procedures, develop new ones, and focus on several operational aspects that will dictate future interventional techniques to enhance cancer care, particularly by accelerating drug development and improving patient outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Interventional oncology is vital for cancer diagnosis, therapy, and symptom palliation. This report focuses on current interventional procedures and techniques with a look toward future improvements that will improve cancer care and patient outcomes.

Expanding the Scope of Evidence-Based Cancer Care

This article explores how oncology research can be expanded to ensure that research spending results in maximum benefit. The focus has shifted to the value and quality of care, which view cancer care with the perspective of the patient at the center and cover the spectrum of care. Because there is no agreed-upon definition for value in cancer care, we overview various contributions to defining value and quality in oncology. We outline how cancer care costs are measured in the United States and explore outcome measures that have been proposed and implemented to enable us to assess value in oncology.

Incorporating Quality of Life Metrics in Interventional Oncology Practice

Interventional radiologists care for a large number of cancer patients with the breadth of palliative intent minimally invasive procedures that we provide. Understanding our meaningful impact on patients' quality of life is essential toward validating our role in the palliation of cancer patients. As such, it is critically important for interventional radiologists to understand common instruments used for the reporting of patient's quality of life measures. Common instruments used to measure pain and quality of life for cancer patients include the numerical rating scale, visual analog scale, brief pain inventory, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy. An ideal quality of life instrument should be a patient reported outcome measure across multiple domains (e.g., physical health, psychological, social), and be both validated and reliable.

Commentary: how will interventional oncology navigate the "valleys of death" for new medical devices?

Whereas clinical trials of cancer drugs have methodological standards and conventional primary endpoints, these are not necessarily applicable to the clinical development of loco-regional treatments and new medical devices. The current challenge is to generate high-level clinical evidence for loco-regional treatments to define the benefits for patients. In this article, we argue that, to generate convincing evidence of clinical efficacy and safety, the collective coherence of the entire data package is often more important than the primary endpoint of one clinical trial. We also propose that, when a comprehensive clinical data package is not feasible, limited clinical data can be supplemented with other types of evidence. Emerging life science companies often define the "valley of death" after securing initial investment to translate an early medical device concept to a development stage that is attractive to funders. Unfortunately for this industry, there is a second "valley of death" if the focus and goal is only regulatory approval, to the neglect of clinical acceptance and reimbursement. For the emerging specialism of interventional oncology, it is critical to plan a clear line of sight for each new medical device to avoid the valleys of death and to demonstrate the clinical benefit. Increased international guidance to establish realistic yet convincing standards in this area may avoid attrition of potentially beneficial devices and therapeutic procedures in the valleys of death.

Cross-sectional study of the provision of interventional oncology services in the UK

OBJECTIVE

To map out the current provision of interventional oncology (IO) services in the UK.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional multicentre study.

SETTING

All National Health Service (NHS) trusts in England and Scottish, Welsh and Northern Ireland health boards.

PARTICIPANTS

Interventional radiology (IR) departments in all NHS trusts/health boards in the UK.

RESULTS

A total of 179 NHS trusts/health boards were contacted. We received a 100% response rate. Only 19 (11%) institutions had an IO lead. 144 trusts (80%) provided IO services or had a formal pathway of referral in place for patients to a recipient trust. 21 trusts (12%) had plans to provide an IO service or formal referral pathway in the next 12 months only. 14 trusts (8%) did not have a pathway of referral and no plans to implement one. 70 trusts (39%) offered supportive and disease-modifying procedures. One trust had a formal referral pathway for supportive procedures. 73 trusts (41%) provided only supportive procedures (diagnostic or therapeutic). Of these, 43 (59%) had a referral pathway for disease-modifying IO procedures, either from a regional cancer network or through IR networks and 30 trusts (41%) did not have a referral pathway for disease-modifying procedures.

CONCLUSION

The provision of IO services in the UK is promising; however, collaborative networks are necessary to ensure disease-modifying IO procedures are made accessible to all patients and to facilitate larger registry data for research with commissioning of new services.

The need for multidisciplinarity in specialist training to optimize future patient care

Harmonious interactions between radiation, medical, interventional and surgical oncologists, as well as other members of multidisciplinary teams, are essential for the optimization of patient care in oncology. This multidisciplinary approach is particularly important in the current landscape, in which standard-of-care approaches to cancer treatment are evolving towards highly targeted treatments, precise image guidance and personalized cancer therapy. Herein, we highlight the importance of multidisciplinarity and interdisciplinarity at all levels of clinical oncology training. Potential deficits in the current career development pathways and suggested strategies to broaden clinical training and research are presented, with specific emphasis on the merits of trainee involvement in functional multidisciplinary teams. Finally, the importance of training in multidisciplinary research is discussed, with the expectation that this awareness will yield the most fertile ground for future discoveries. Our key message is for cancer professionals to fulfil their duty in ensuring that trainees appreciate the importance of multidisciplinary research and practice.

Theoretical model for laser ablation outcome predictions in brain: calibration and validation on clinical MR thermometry images

PURPOSE

Neurosurgical laser ablation is experiencing a renaissance. Computational tools for ablation planning aim to further improve the intervention. Here, global optimisation and inverse problems are demonstrated to train a model that predicts maximum laser ablation extent.

METHODS

A closed-form steady state model is trained on and then subsequently compared to N = 20 retrospective clinical MR thermometry datasets. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) is calculated to provide a measure of region overlap between the 57 °C isotherms of the thermometry data and the model-predicted ablation regions; 57 °C is a tissue death surrogate at thermal steady state. A global optimisation scheme samples the dominant model parameter sensitivities, blood perfusion (ω) and optical parameter (μ_eff) values, throughout a parameter space totalling 11 440 value-pairs. This represents a lookup table of μ_eff-ω pairs with the corresponding DSC value for each patient dataset. The μ_eff-ω pair with the maximum DSC calibrates the model parameters, maximising predictive value for each patient. Finally, leave-one-out cross-validation with global optimisation information trains the model on the entire clinical dataset, and compares against the model naïvely using literature values for ω and μ_eff.

RESULTS

When using naïve literature values, the model's mean DSC is 0.67 whereas the calibrated model produces 0.82 during cross-validation, an improvement of 0.15 in overlap with the patient data. The 95% confidence interval of the mean difference is 0.083-0.23 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

During cross-validation, the calibrated model is superior to the naïve model as measured by DSC, with +22% mean prediction accuracy. Calibration empowers a relatively simple model to become more predictive.

Building the Nonuniversity, Tertiary Care Center Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Practice: Structural and Financial Considerations

Early in their careers, many new surgeons lack the background and experience to understand essential components needed to build a surgical practice. Surgical resident education is often devoid of specific instruction on the business of medicine and practice management. In particular, hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HPB) surgeons require many key components to build a successful practice secondary to significant interdisciplinary coordination and a scope of complex surgery, which spans challenging benign and malignant disease processes. In the following, we describe the required clinical and financial components for developing a successful HPB surgery practice in the nonuniversity tertiary care center. We discuss significant financial considerations for understanding community need and hospital investment, contract establishment, billing, and coding. We summarize the structural elements and key personnel necessary for establishing an effectual HPB surgical team. This article provides useful, essential information for a new HPB surgeon looking to establish a surgical practice. It also provides insight for health-care administrators as to the value an HPB surgeon can bring to a hospital or health-care system.

Use of C-Arm Cone Beam CT During Hepatic Radioembolization: Protocol Optimization for Extrahepatic Shunting and Parenchymal Enhancement

PURPOSE

To optimize a C-arm computed tomography (CT) protocol for radioembolization (RE), specifically for extrahepatic shunting and parenchymal enhancement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective development study was performed per IDEAL recommendations. A literature-based protocol was applied in patients with unresectable and chemorefractory liver malignancies undergoing an angiography before radioembolization. Contrast and scan settings were adjusted stepwise and repeatedly reviewed in a consensus meeting. Afterwards, two independent raters analyzed all scans. A third rater evaluated the SPECT/CT scans as a reference standard for extrahepatic shunting and lack of target segment perfusion.

RESULTS

Fifty scans were obtained in 29 procedures. The first protocol, using a 6 s delay and 10 s scan, showed insufficient parenchymal enhancement. In the second protocol, the delay was determined by timing parenchymal enhancement on DSA power injection (median 8 s, range 4-10 s): enhancement improved, but breathing artifacts increased (from 0 to 27 %). Since the third protocol with a 5 s scan decremented subjective image quality, the second protocol was deemed optimal. Median CNR (range) was 1.7 (0.6-3.2), 2.2 (-1.4-4.0), and 2.1 (-0.3-3.0) for protocol 1, 2, and 3 (p = 0.80). Delineation of perfused segments was possible in 57, 73, and 44 % of scans (p = 0.13). In all C-arm CTs combined, the negative predictive value was 95 % for extrahepatic shunting and 83 % for lack of target segment perfusion.

CONCLUSION

An optimized C-arm CT protocol was developed that can be used to detect extrahepatic shunts and non-perfusion of target segments during RE.