1
|
Favaretto M, Rost M. "A Picture Paints a Thousand Words"-A Systematic Review of the Ethical Issues of Prenatal Ultrasound. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2024:10.1007/s11673-024-10360-0. [PMID: 39158656 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-024-10360-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024]
Abstract
Prenatal ultrasound is a non-invasive diagnostic examination. Despite the recognized diagnostic value, this technology raises complex ethical questions. The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis that coherently maps the ethical challenges raised by prenatal ultrasound examination, both 2D and 3D. We performed a systematic literature review. Six databases were systematically searched. The results highlight how concerns related to beneficence, informed consent, and autonomy are mainly related to routine use of prenatal ultrasound in the clinical context, while considerations linked to overmedicalization of pregnancy, discrimination, and fetal ontology were often reported in relation to the impact ultrasound is having on medicine and society. Ethical issues in the context of pre-abortion ultrasound, obstetric practices in low-income settings, and keepsake ultrasound imaging were also greatly discussed. Since prenatal ultrasound practices critically impact pregnant people's autonomy and their role within pregnancy, we conclude that information providing strategies should be developed to appropriately inform pregnant people about the nature, purpose, risks, and choices revolving around prenatal ultrasound. In addition, as it is becoming increasingly difficult to separate the social and clinical dimensions of prenatal ultrasound, future research should focus on examining if and how such dimensions should be reconciled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Favaretto
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M Rost
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lamsal R, Yeh EA, Pullenayegum E, Ungar WJ. A Systematic Review of Methods and Practice for Integrating Maternal, Fetal, and Child Health Outcomes, and Family Spillover Effects into Cost-Utility Analyses. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024; 42:843-863. [PMID: 38819718 PMCID: PMC11249496 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01397-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maternal-perinatal interventions delivered during pregnancy or childbirth have unique characteristics that impact the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the mother, fetus, and newborn child. However, maternal-perinatal cost-utility analyses (CUAs) often only consider either maternal or child health outcomes. Challenges include, but are not limited to, measuring fetal, newborn, and infant health outcomes, and assessing their impact on maternal HRQoL. It is also important to recognize the impact of maternal-perinatal health on family members' HRQoL (i.e., family spillover effects) and to incorporate these effects in maternal-perinatal CUAs. OBJECTIVE The aim was to systematically review the methods used to include health outcomes of pregnant women, fetuses, and children and to incorporate family spillover effects in maternal-perinatal CUAs. METHODS A literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, EconLit, Cochrane Collection, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA), and the Pediatric Economic Database Evaluation (PEDE) databases from inception to 2020 to identify maternal-perinatal CUAs that included health outcomes for pregnant women, fetuses, and/or children. The search was updated to December 2022 using PEDE. Data describing how the health outcomes of mothers, fetuses, and children were measured, incorporated, and reported along with the data on family spillover effects were extracted. RESULTS Out of 174 maternal-perinatal CUAs identified, 62 considered the health outcomes of pregnant women, and children. Among the 54 quality-adjusted life year (QALY)-based CUAs, 12 included fetal health outcomes, the impact of fetal loss on mothers' HRQoL, and the impact of neonatal demise on mothers' HRQoL. Four studies considered fetal health outcomes and the effects of fetal loss on mothers' HRQoL. One study included fetal health outcomes and the impact of neonatal demise on maternal HRQoL. Furthermore, six studies considered the impact of neonatal demise on maternal HRQoL, while four included fetal health outcomes. One study included the impact of fetal loss on maternal HRQoL. The remaining 26 only included the health outcomes of pregnant women and children. Among the eight disability-adjusted life year (DALY)-based CUAs, two measured fetal health outcomes. Out of 174 studies, only one study included family spillover effects. The most common measurement approach was to measure the health outcomes of pregnant women and children separately. Various approaches were used to assess fetal losses in terms of QALYs or DALYs and their impact on HRQoL of mothers. The most common integration approach was to sum the QALYs or DALYs for pregnant women and children. Most studies reported combined QALYs and incremental QALYs, or DALYs and incremental DALYs, at the family level for pregnant women and children. CONCLUSIONS Approximately one-third of maternal-perinatal CUAs included the health outcomes of pregnant women, fetuses, and/or children. Future CUAs of maternal-perinatal interventions, conducted from a societal perspective, should aim to incorporate health outcomes for mothers, fetuses, and children when appropriate. The various approaches used within these CUAs highlight the need for standardized measurement and integration methods, potentially leading to rigorous and standardized inclusion practices, providing higher-quality evidence to better inform decision-makers about the costs and benefits of maternal-perinatal interventions. Health Technology Assessment agencies may consider providing guidance for interventions affecting future lives in future updates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramesh Lamsal
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - E Ann Yeh
- Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Neurosciences and Mental Health, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eleanor Pullenayegum
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Wendy J Ungar
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, 686 Bay Street, 11th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 0A4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nakou P. Women's reproductive choice and (elective) egg freezing: is an extension of the storage limit missing a bigger issue? New Bioeth 2024; 30:11-33. [PMID: 38506261 DOI: 10.1080/20502877.2023.2300233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
Egg freezing can allow women to preserve their eggs to avoid age-related infertility. The UK's recent extension of elective egg freezing storage has been welcomed as a way of enhancing the reproductive choices of young women who wish to delay having children. In this paper, I explore the issue of enhancing women's reproductive choices, questioning whether there is a more significant aspect overlooked in egg freezing. While increasing storage limits expands reproductive choices for some women, focus on this extension alone, I argue, misses a fundamental issue with egg preservation that often remains ignored; the importance of effective information on egg freezing and the effect this has on women's reproductive choices. Ultimately, I highlight the crucial role of balanced information in enhancing women's choices regarding egg freezing and argue that focusing on extending and increasing provision may obscure this real opportunity to empower women and their authentic reproductive choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiota Nakou
- Department of Law, Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wong HYC, Asim S, Feng Q, Fu SXH, Sahota DS, So PL, Dong D. Effectiveness of Interactive Digital Decision Aids in Prenatal Screening Decision-making: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e37953. [PMID: 36917146 PMCID: PMC10131906 DOI: 10.2196/37953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing prenatal screening options and limited consultation time have made it difficult for pregnant women to participate in shared decision-making. Interactive digital decision aids (IDDAs) could integrate interactive technology into health care to a facilitate higher-quality decision-making process. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of IDDAs on pregnant women's decision-making regarding prenatal screening. METHODS We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Google Scholar, and reference lists of included studies until August 2021. We included the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the use of IDDAs (fulfilling basic criteria of International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration and these were interactive and digital) as an adjunct to standard care with standard care alone and involved pregnant women themselves in prenatal screening decision-making. Data on primary outcomes, that is, knowledge and decisional conflict, and secondary outcomes were extracted, and meta-analyses were conducted based on standardized mean differences (SMDs). Subgroup analysis based on knowledge was performed. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used for risk-of-bias assessment. RESULTS Eight RCTs were identified from 10,283 references, of which 7 were included in quantitative synthesis. Analyses showed that IDDAs increased knowledge (SMD 0.58, 95% CI 0.26-0.90) and decreased decisional conflict (SMD -0.15, 95% CI -0.25 to -0.05). Substantial heterogeneity in knowledge was identified, which could not be completely resolved through subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS IDDAs can improve certain aspects of decision-making in prenatal screening among pregnant women, but the results require cautious interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Yat Conrad Wong
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.,Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Saba Asim
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Qi Feng
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sherry Xiao-Hong Fu
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Daljit Singh Sahota
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Po Lam So
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong
| | - Dong Dong
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.,Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Claesen Z, Crombag N, Henneman L, Vermeesch JR, Borry P. Expanded Non-invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) : Can the Child's Right to an Open Future Help Set the Scope? JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2023; 20:41-49. [PMID: 36630060 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-022-10222-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Expanded non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has provoked ethical concerns about its justifiable scope. In this paper, we evaluate the role of the child's right to an open future in setting the scope of NIPT. This 'open future principle' has been cited in arguments both limiting and expanding parental freedoms. This moral right holds that adult autonomy rights which children cannot yet exercise should nonetheless be protected until they can. Its purpose is to protect the future autonomy of the child as a future adult. Several authors have extended this rationale from child to fetus. However, the right was not anticipated to apply to the fetus, a non-legal entity in many jurisdictions. The aim of this paper is to reconsider whether this principle is useful to help deliberate the scope of NIPT. We find that extending the open future principle to delineate the scope of NIPT is theoretically flawed. We contend that in the prenatal context its value primarily lies with counselling for prenatal screening where it can be used to encourage parents' reflection on the implications of knowing for the sake of knowing on their future children and their relationship with them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoë Claesen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35/3 (box 7001), 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Neeltje Crombag
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Urogenital, Abdominal and Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49 (box 611), ON, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joris Robert Vermeesch
- Department of Human Genetics, Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, University Hospitals Leuven, ON I Herestraat 49 (box 606), 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35/3 (box 7001), 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bowman-Smart H, Gyngell C, Mand C, Amor DJ, Delatycki MB, Savulescu J. Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for "Non-Medical" Traits: Ensuring Consistency in Ethical Decision-Making. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2023; 23:3-20. [PMID: 34846986 PMCID: PMC7614328 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1996659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
The scope of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) could expand in the future to include detailed analysis of the fetal genome. This will allow for the testing for virtually any trait with a genetic contribution, including "non-medical" traits. Here we discuss the potential use of NIPT for these traits. We outline a scenario which highlights possible inconsistencies with ethical decision-making. We then discuss the case against permitting these uses. The objections include practical problems; increasing inequities; increasing the burden of choice; negative impacts on the child, family, and society; and issues with implementation. We then outline the case for permitting the use of NIPT for these traits. These include arguments for reproductive liberty and autonomy; questioning the labeling of traits as "non-medical"; and the principle of procreative beneficence. This summary of the case for and against can serve as a basis for the development of a consistent and coherent ethical framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary Bowman-Smart
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Corresponding author: Hilary Bowman-Smart Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, 50 Flemington Rd, Parkville Victoria Australia 3052, , (03) 8341 6200
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
| | - Cara Mand
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
| | - David J. Amor
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Parkville, Australia
| | - Martin B. Delatycki
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Parkville, Australia
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Perrot A, Horn R. Health professionals and scientists' views on genome-wide NIPT in the French public health system: Critical analysis of the ethical issues raised by prenatal genomics. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0277010. [PMID: 36318580 PMCID: PMC9624390 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
In France, since January 2020, laboratories have started to make available genome-wide Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (GW-NIPT) beyond the three common trisomies (T21, T13 and T18) at the same cost as standard NIPT. With the possible margins for interpretation of the legal framework and in the absence of clear and updated guidelines, health professionals are left with questions about which type of screening offer may be clinically responsible, morally appropriate, and, at the same time, respectful of women’s values and ability to make autonomous choices. The aim of this study is to provide an analysis and understanding of the challenging dimensions of clinical practices in the context of evolving scientific knowledge and techniques in prenatal genomics. In this article, we develop a critical analysis of the arguments and concerns that emerge around the offer of expanded NIPT and are discussed by health professionals and scientists. To achieve this, we conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with 17 health professionals and scientists from September 2021 to February 2022 and a comprehensive literature review (regulatory, scientific, medical, institutional sources). The results of our empirical research highlight the importance of addressing ethical issues related to the differing quality of counselling, the complexity of achieving informed consent, and the avoidance of harm to pregnant women in the feedback of findings beyond T21, T18 and T13. If there is an increase in the provision of GW-NIPT within the French public health system, it will be essential to promote medical practices that respect reproductive choices of women, support their autonomous decision and their understanding of the limitations and uncertainties associated with GW screening. Further research is required to provide an insight into women’s perceptions in order to refine our analysis from the patients’ perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adeline Perrot
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Ruth Horn
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Ethik der Medizin, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bayefsky MJ, Berkman BE. Implementing Expanded Prenatal Genetic Testing: Should Parents Have Access to Any and All Fetal Genetic Information? THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2022; 22:4-22. [PMID: 33459580 PMCID: PMC10066540 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1867933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Prenatal genetic testing is becoming available for an increasingly broad set of diseases, and it is only a matter of time before parents can choose to test for hundreds, if not thousands, of genetic conditions in their fetuses. Should access to certain kinds of fetal genetic information be limited, and if so, on what basis? We evaluate a range of considerations including reproductive autonomy, parental rights, disability rights, and the rights and interests of the fetus as a potential future child. We conclude that parents should be able to access information that could be useful during pregnancy, but that testing for non-medical information should be limited. Next, we argue that the government lacks a compelling state interest in regulating prenatal genetic testing and propose that regulation should occur through medical professional organizations. Finally, we present a framework for determining what testing physicians should recommend, offer neutrally, or not offer at all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle J. Bayefsky
- New York University Langone Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Benjamin E. Berkman
- National Institutes of Health, Department of Bioethics, Bethesda, MD, USA
- National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nakou P. Is routine prenatal screening and testing fundamentally incompatible with a commitment to reproductive choice? Learning from the historical context. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2021; 24:73-83. [PMID: 33128164 PMCID: PMC7910369 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-020-09985-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
An enduring ethical dispute accompanies prenatal screening and testing (PST) technologies. This ethical debate focuses on notions of reproductive choice. On one side of the dispute are those who have supported PST as a way to empower women's reproductive choice, while on the other side are those who argue that PST, particularly when made a routine part of prenatal care, limits deliberate choice. Empirical research does not resolve this ethical debate with evidence both of women for whom PST enhances their choices but also persistent evidence of recurrent problems between PST and women's autonomous decision-making. While there have been attempts to remove challenges to reproductive choice, it has been argued that these challenges cannot be removed entirely. In this paper I provide a historical review of PST technologies' development and in doing so provide a detailed insight into the root causes of this tension between the opposing sides of this debate. This historical account provides evidence that those who championed the early use of these technologies did so in order to achieve a number of wholly different goals other than women's choice and empowerment. These different aims focus on scientific discovery and eugenic goals and, I argue, are irreconcilable with women's choice and empowerment. It thus may not be surprising that the resulting practice of PST continues to resist compatibility with women's choice and empowerment. Ultimately, by understanding the historical foundations of PST we can more effectively assess how to reconcile women's reproductive autonomy with routine prenatal screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiota Nakou
- Department of Law, School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Löwy I. Non-invasive prenatal testing: A diagnostic innovation shaped by commercial interests and the regulation conundrum. Soc Sci Med 2020; 304:113064. [PMID: 32534823 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is grounded in the analysis of free circulating fetal DNA (cfDNA) in pregnant women's blood. The rolling out of this screening method was in large part driven by commercial firms, which hoped to reach a huge potential market by offering a test that was expected to be risk-free, reliable, inexpensive, and able to detect a wide range of genetic traits of the future child. To date, most predictions about the scope and uses of NIPT have not materialized: in 2020 NIPT detects only a limited number of genetic anomalies, while results have to be confirmed by amniocentesis. NIPT has become a commercial success. Nevertheless the implementation of NIPT has tended to diverge across different national settings. In countries that already have state-sponsored screening for Down risk, NIPT has been offered by the state health insurance to women defined as "high risk", using a variant of the test that detects only three autosomal aneuploidies: trisomy 21, 13 and 18. These countries effectively regulate the supply of NIPT on grounds of cost-effectiveness and reliability. In countries without state-sponsored screening for Down risk, in contrast, multiple versions of NIPT covering a wider range of birth defects are commonly available on the free market, and purchased by women at low as well as high risk of having an affected child. Market-based healthcare systems tend to present women who can afford to pay for NIPT with a largely unregulated choice of technologies - though reimbursement rules imposed by private insurance providers may serve in effect to regulate use by those consumers who cannot afford to pay for tests from their own pockets. This regulatory divergence is shaped by the presence or absence of prior state-sponsored screening programs for Down risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilana Löwy
- Cermes3 : INSERM, U 988, CNRS, UMR 8211, EHESS and Paris Descartes University, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kessels SJM, Carter D, Ellery B, Newton S, Merlin TL. Prenatal genetic testing for cystic fibrosis: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness and an ethics review. Genet Med 2019; 22:258-267. [PMID: 31467445 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0641-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to assess the clinical value of prenatal testing for cystic fibrosis (CF) and whether ethical considerations would affect endpoint selection. METHODS To determine effectiveness, we conducted a systematic literature review whose protocol outlined search strategies across eight databases, study inclusion criteria, and prespecified literature screening, data extraction, and synthesis processes. We conducted a scoping search on ethical considerations. RESULTS The genetic test showed good diagnostic performance. A change in clinical management was observed: termination of pregnancy (TOP) occurred in most cases where two pathogenic variants were identified in a fetus of carrier parents (158/167; 94.6%). The TOP rate was lower in pregnancies where CF was diagnosed after fetal echogenic bowel detection (~65%). TOP and caring for a child with CF were both associated with poor short-term parental psychological outcomes. Ethical analyses indicated that informed decisions should have been the main endpoint, rather than CF-affected births prevented. CONCLUSION CF testing leads to fewer CF-affected births. It is difficult to assess whether this means the test is valuable, since patients may not value TOP primarily in terms of maternal or fetal health outcomes, psychological or otherwise. The value of testing should arguably be measured in terms of improving patient autonomy rather than health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon J M Kessels
- Adelaide Health Technology Assessment (AHTA), School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Drew Carter
- Adelaide Health Technology Assessment (AHTA), School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | - Benjamin Ellery
- Adelaide Health Technology Assessment (AHTA), School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Skye Newton
- Adelaide Health Technology Assessment (AHTA), School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Tracy L Merlin
- Adelaide Health Technology Assessment (AHTA), School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Laberge AM, Birko S, Lemoine MÈ, Le Clerc-Blain J, Haidar H, Affdal AO, Dupras C, Ravitsky V. Canadian Pregnant Women's Preferences Regarding NIPT for Down Syndrome: The Information They Want, How They Want to Get It, and With Whom They Want to Discuss It. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2019; 41:782-791. [PMID: 30738740 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Revised: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study sought to assess Canadian pregnant women's and their partners' preferences for information about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). METHODS Pregnant women and their partners across Canada were surveyed as part of the Personalized Genomics for prenatal Aneuploidy Screening Using maternal blood (PEGASUS) study. RESULTS A total of 882 pregnant women and 395 partners participated. Women preferred being informed by a physician (77.2%). They preferred getting information ahead of time, except for information about resources for families with Down syndrome, which they preferred getting with test results. More than half thought that written consent is important (63.7%) and could decide whether to do NIPT on the day they received the information (54.9%). Women preferred to be informed of results by telephone (43.7%) or in person (28%), but they preferred in person if they were considered at high risk for Down syndrome on the basis of the results (76%). The partner was the person whose input was considered most important (62.6%). Partners' preferences were similar, except that partners tended to want information later (at the time of the test or with the results) and felt that their opinion was not considered as highly by health professionals. CONCLUSION Canadian women want information about NIPT early, in person, by a knowledgeable physician. Partners also want to be informed and involved in the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Marie Laberge
- Department of Pediatrics, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC; Service de génétique médicale, Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, QC; Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, QC.
| | - Stanislav Birko
- Bioethics Program, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC
| | - Marie-Ève Lemoine
- Bioethics Program, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC
| | | | - Hazar Haidar
- Institute for Health and Social Policy (IHSP), McGill University, Montréal, QC; Centre de recherche en éthique (CRÉ) de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC
| | - Aliya O Affdal
- Bioethics Program, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC
| | - Charles Dupras
- Institute for Health and Social Policy (IHSP), McGill University, Montréal, QC; Centre de recherche en éthique (CRÉ) de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC
| | - Vardit Ravitsky
- Bioethics Program, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
|
14
|
Kater-Kuipers A, Bunnik EM, de Beaufort ID, Galjaard RJH. Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018; 18:409. [PMID: 30340550 PMCID: PMC6194707 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-2050-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for foetal aneuploidies is currently changing the field of prenatal screening in many countries. As it is non-invasive, safe and accurate, this technique allows for a broad implementation of first-trimester prenatal screening, which raises ethical issues, related, for instance, to informed choice and adverse societal consequences. This article offers an account of a leading international ethical framework for prenatal screening, examines how this framework is used by professionals working in the field of NIPT, and presents ethical guidance for the expansion of the scope of prenatal screening in practice. Methods A comparative analysis of authoritative documents is combined with 15 semi-structured interviews with professionals in the field of prenatal screening in the Netherlands. Data were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Results The current ethical framework consists of four pillars: the aim of screening, the proportionality of the test, justice, and societal aspects. Respondents recognised and supported this framework in practice, but expressed some concerns. Professionals felt that pregnant women do not always make informed choices, while this is seen as central to reproductive autonomy (the aim of screening), and that pre-test counselling practices stand in need of improvement. Respondents believed that the benefits of NIPT, and of an expansion of its scope, outweigh the harms (proportionality), which are thought to be acceptable. They felt that the out-of-pocket financial contribution currently required by pregnant women constitutes a barrier to access to NIPT, which disproportionally affects those of a lower socioeconomic status (justice). Finally, professionals recognised but did not share concerns about a rising pressure to test or discrimination of disabled persons (societal aspects). Conclusions Four types of limits to the scope of NIPT are proposed: NIPT should generate only test outcomes that are relevant to reproductive decision-making, informed choice should be (made) possible through adequate pre-test counselling, the rights of future children should be respected, and equal access should be guaranteed. Although the focus of the interview study is on the Dutch healthcare setting, insights and conclusions can be applied internationally and to other healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kater-Kuipers
- Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Room 24.17, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E M Bunnik
- Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Room 24.17, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - I D de Beaufort
- Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Room 24.17, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R J H Galjaard
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dupras C, Birko S, Affdal A, Haidar H, Lemoine ME, Ravitsky V. Benefits, challenges and ethical principles associated with implementing noninvasive prenatal testing: a Delphi study. CMAJ Open 2018; 6:E513-E519. [PMID: 30381324 PMCID: PMC6208091 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20180083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Noninvasive prenatal testing is a recent technology that provides some genetic information about the fetus through the analysis of cell-free fetal DNA circulating in maternal blood. We aimed to identify the benefits, challenges and guiding ethical principles most relevant to the clinical integration of noninvasive prenatal testing in Canada, according to experts throughout the country. METHODS We conducted a 3-round Delphi study involving Canadian experts of contemporary discussions about the ethical and societal implications of prenatal testing and genomic technologies. In round 1, we asked participants to identify clinical benefits and challenges related to the implementation of noninvasive prenatal testing in Canada, and the ethical principles they think should guide it. In round 2, we asked participants to select the most important elements stated by their peers. In round 3, participants were informed of the aggregated results from round 2, and invited to revise or confirm their selection. RESULTS Round 1 had a participation rate of 20.2%, and involved 61 participants. Subsequent rounds 2 and 3 had retention rates of 95.1% (n = 58) and 84.5% (n = 49), respectively. Through these discussions, we identified 3 lists of benefits (n = 10), challenges (n = 27), and ethical principles (n = 16) prioritized by Canadian experts as being most relevant to the implementation of noninvasive prenatal testing in Canada. INTERPRETATION Although multiple and diverse potential issues were identified, Canadian experts agreed on 2 sets of requirements for the responsible implementation of noninvasive prenatal testing in Canada. Interdisciplinary appraisals may be instrumental to responsible policy-making related to the implementation of noninvasive prenatal testing in Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Dupras
- Center of Genomics and Policy (Dupras) and Institute for Health and Social Policy (Haidar) McGill University; École de santé publique, Université de Montréal (Birko, Affdal, Haidar, Lemoine, Ravitsky), Montréal, Que.
| | - Stanislav Birko
- Center of Genomics and Policy (Dupras) and Institute for Health and Social Policy (Haidar) McGill University; École de santé publique, Université de Montréal (Birko, Affdal, Haidar, Lemoine, Ravitsky), Montréal, Que
| | - Aliya Affdal
- Center of Genomics and Policy (Dupras) and Institute for Health and Social Policy (Haidar) McGill University; École de santé publique, Université de Montréal (Birko, Affdal, Haidar, Lemoine, Ravitsky), Montréal, Que
| | - Hazar Haidar
- Center of Genomics and Policy (Dupras) and Institute for Health and Social Policy (Haidar) McGill University; École de santé publique, Université de Montréal (Birko, Affdal, Haidar, Lemoine, Ravitsky), Montréal, Que
| | - Marie-Eve Lemoine
- Center of Genomics and Policy (Dupras) and Institute for Health and Social Policy (Haidar) McGill University; École de santé publique, Université de Montréal (Birko, Affdal, Haidar, Lemoine, Ravitsky), Montréal, Que
| | - Vardit Ravitsky
- Center of Genomics and Policy (Dupras) and Institute for Health and Social Policy (Haidar) McGill University; École de santé publique, Université de Montréal (Birko, Affdal, Haidar, Lemoine, Ravitsky), Montréal, Que
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sainz JA, Gutierrez L, García-Mejido J, Ramos Z, Bonomi MJ, Fernández-Palacín A, Aquise A. Early fetal morphological evaluation (11-13 + 6 weeks) accomplished exclusively by transabdominal imaging and following routine midtrimester fetal ultrasound scan recommendations. Since when can it be performed? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 33:1140-1150. [PMID: 30153766 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1517306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: To establish the best timing for the realization of first-trimester-morphologic-evaluation, following routine midtrimester fetal-ultrasound-scan-recommendations (RFUSR), by performing exclusive transabdominal exploration, and to determine the sensitivity of the mentioned scan for diagnosis of major structural abnormalities.Method: Prospective observational study with 512 pregnant women with singleton gestations (438 low-risk, 74 high-risk) was conducted. Early fetal morphological evaluation (EFME) is performed in line with RFUSR (18-22 weeks) (ISUOG 2010) and a check-list structured evaluation was followed, between 11-13 + 6 weeks. Its performance is assessed in the correct identification of normal fetal anatomy, and its effectiveness in the detection of structural defectsResults: Five hundred and four pregnant women were evaluated, of which, 58.3% EFME are considered complete fetal anatomical surveys. Complete fetal anatomical surveys scans rise from 23.1% at 11-11 + 6 weeks to 63.8% at 13 + 3-13 weeks, with a clear turning point at 12 + 6-13 + 3 weeks (63.8%) (p < .05). From 12 + 6-13 + 3 weeks only renal (26.3%) and cardiac assessments (31.6%) present an inconclusive evaluation greater than 20%. Body mass index (23.9 versus 29.8) and estimated fetal weight (63 versus 86.7 g) influence EMFE's ability of identifying fetal structures (p < .05). EMFE presents sensitivity for the identification of structural malformations of 83.3% (20/24).Conclusions: From 12 + 6 weeks of gestation onwards, a complete fetal morphological evaluation can be performed in 63.8% of cases following the routine midtrimester fetal ultrasound scan recommendations (ISUOG's 20 weeks scan).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José A Sainz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Laura Gutierrez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain
| | - José García-Mejido
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain
| | - Zenaida Ramos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain
| | - María J Bonomi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain
| | - Ana Fernández-Palacín
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Adriana Aquise
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tosello B, Dany L. Psycho-social approach of perinatal palliative care. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 32:3693-3696. [PMID: 29656674 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1465915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Barthélémy Tosello
- a Aix-Marseille University, EFS/CNRS, UMR 7268 ADÉS, Espace Éthique Méditerranéen, Hospital La Timone , Marseille , France.,b Department of Neonatology , Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hospital Nord , Marseille , France
| | - Lionel Dany
- c LPS EA 849, Aix Marseille Université , Aix-en-Provence , France.,d Department of Oncology , Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hospital La Timone , Marseille , France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Haidar H, Dupras C, Ravitsky V. Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Review of Ethical, Legal and Social Implications. BIOÉTHIQUEONLINE 2018. [DOI: 10.7202/1044264ar] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from maternal blood has recently entered clinical practice in many countries, including Canada. This test can be performed early during pregnancy to detect Down syndrome and other conditions. While NIPT promises numerous benefits, it also has challenging ethical, legal and social implications (ELSI). This paper reviews concerns currently found in the literature on the ELSI of NIPT. We make four observations. First, NIPT seems to exacerbate some of the already existing concerns raised by other prenatal tests (amniocentesis and maternal serum screening) such as threats to women’s reproductive autonomy and the potential for discrimination and stigmatization of disabled individuals and their families. This may be due to the likely upcoming large scale implementation and routinization of NIPT. Second, the distinction between NIPT as a screening test (as it is currently recommended) and as a diagnostic test (potentially in the future), has certain implications for the ELSI discussion. Third, we observed a progressive shift in the literature from initially including mostly conceptual analysis to an increasing number of empirical studies. This demonstrates the contribution of empirical bioethics approaches as the technology is being implemented into clinical use. Finally, we noted an increasing interest in equity and justice concerns regarding access to NIPT as it becomes more widely implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hazar Haidar
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Charles Dupras
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Vardit Ravitsky
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Narayanan S, Blumberg B, Clayman ML, Pan V, Wicklund C. Exploring the Issues Surrounding Clinical Exome Sequencing in the Prenatal Setting. J Genet Couns 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0245-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
20
|
|
21
|
Richardson A, Ormond KE. Ethical considerations in prenatal testing: Genomic testing and medical uncertainty. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 23:1-6. [PMID: 29033309 DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2017.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Prenatal diagnostic testing has recently progressed from karyotype to routinely available chromosomal microarray, and the potential for fetal whole exome sequencing, both through invasive diagnostic testing and, in some cases, non-invasive prenatal testing. These tests bring beneficence through providing a higher diagnostic yield, often with lower risks of miscarriage than previously available testing, but also raise the question of harms related to an increase in uncertain and unknown results. Some parents-to-be report a desire to learn as much information as possible prenatally, and there may be beneficence in providing them with this information. However, the potential uncertainty these tests may create may raise anxiety and may complicate pregnancy decision-making for both patients and providers. This article reviews current prenatal technologies and the growing research on the clinical and ethical aspects of uncertainty as it relates to expanding prenatal testing options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia Richardson
- Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford, Fetal and Pregnancy Health Program, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Kelly E Ormond
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hens K. Chromosome Screening Using Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Beyond Trisomy-21: What to Screen for and Why It Matters. THE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY 2017; 43:8-21. [DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhx030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
|
23
|
Abstract
The clinical integration of prenatal genetic technologies raises a series of important medical and ethical considerations for patients, families, health care providers, health care systems, and society. It is critical to recognize, understand, and address these issues in conjunction with the continued development of new prenatal genetic screens and tests. This article discusses some of the lead ethical issues as a starting point to further understanding their ramifications on patients, families, communities, and health care providers.
Collapse
|
24
|
de Wit MC, Bunnik EM, Go ATJI, de Beaufort ID, Hofstra RMW, Steegers EAP, Galjaard RJH. Amniocentesis is still the best option for advanced genomic testing in case of fetal malformations. Prenat Diagn 2017; 37:1360-1363. [PMID: 29149523 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Revised: 11/05/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M C de Wit
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Centre and Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E M Bunnik
- Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre and Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A T J I Go
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Centre and Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I D de Beaufort
- Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre and Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R M W Hofstra
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre and Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E A P Steegers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Centre and Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R J H Galjaard
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre and Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Horn R, Parker M. Opening Pandora's box?: ethical issues in prenatal whole genome and exome sequencing. Prenat Diagn 2017; 38:20-25. [PMID: 28695688 PMCID: PMC5836985 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2017] [Revised: 07/03/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The development of genomic approaches to prenatal testing such as whole genome and exome sequencing offers the potential for a better understanding of prenatal structural anomalies in the fetus and ultimately for improved patient care and more informed reproductive decision making. In addition to the scientific and clinical challenges of achieving this, the introduction of new reproductive technologies also presents a number of ethical problems. The successful and appropriate development and introduction of prenatal genomics into clinical practice require these problems to be identified, understood and carefully analysed in the development of models of good ethical practice. METHOD We conducted a critical review of the existing literature on ethical issues in prenatal genomics. RESULTS We identified and discussed five areas of particular concern: valid consent, management and feed-back of information, responsibilities of health professionals, priority setting and resources and duties towards the future child. CONCLUSION There is a need for further discussion of the issues we have outlined here, and we hope that this brief summary of ethical arguments in the literature encourages researchers, clinicians, patients and scientists to engage in further discussion of these and other important issues raised by prenatal genomics. © 2017 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Horn
- The Ethox Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Stapleton G. Qualifying choice: ethical reflection on the scope of prenatal screening. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2017; 20:195-205. [PMID: 27631408 PMCID: PMC5487727 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-016-9725-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
In the near future developments in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) may soon provide couples with the opportunity to test for and diagnose a much broader range of heritable and congenital conditions than has previously been possible. Inevitably, this has prompted much ethical debate on the possible implications of NIPT for providing couples with opportunities for reproductive choice by way of routine prenatal screening. In view of the possibility to test for a significantly broader range of genetic conditions with NIPT, the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) and American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) recommend that, pending further debate, prenatal screening for reproductive choice should only be offered where concerning serious congenital conditions and childhood disorders. In support of this recommendation, the ESHG and ASHG discuss a number of ethical issues on which they prompt further debate: the informational privacy of the future child, the trivialization of abortion, the risk of information overload, and issues of distributive justice. This paper responds to this call with further reflection on each ethical issue and how it relates to the moral justification of providing couples with opportunities for meaningful reproductive choice. The paper concludes that whilst there may be good reasons for qualifying the scope of any unsolicited prenatal screening offer to serious congenital conditions and childhood disorders, if prenatal screening is justified for providing couples with opportunities for meaningful reproductive choice, then health services may have obligations to empower couples with the same opportunity where concerning other conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg Stapleton
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Parham L, Michie M, Allyse M. Expanding Use of cfDNA Screening in Pregnancy: Current and Emerging Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues. CURRENT GENETIC MEDICINE REPORTS 2017; 5:44-53. [PMID: 38089918 PMCID: PMC10715629 DOI: 10.1007/s40142-017-0113-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Purpose of Review In 2011, screening platforms became available in the US that detect and analyze fragments of cell-free placental DNA (cfDNA) in maternal blood serum. Marketed as noninvasive prenatal tests (NIPT), cfDNA screening is more accurate than previously available serum screening tests for certain aneuploidies. The combination of a noninvasive procedure, high specificity and sensitivity, and lower false positive rates for some aneuploidies (most notably Down's syndrome) has led to broad clinician and patient adoption. New ethical, legal, and social issues arise from the increased use and expanded implementation of cfDNA in pregnancy. Recent Findings Recently, several professional associations have amended their guidelines on cfDNA, removing language recommending its use in only "high-risk" pregnancies in favor of making cfDNA screening an available option for women with "low-risk" pregnancies as well. At the same time, commercial cfDNA screening laboratories continue to expand the range of available test panels. As a result, the future of prenatal screening will likely include a broader range of genetic tests in a wider range of patients. Summary This article addresses the ethical, legal, and social issues related to the shift in guidance and expanded use of cfDNA in pregnant women, including concerns regarding routinized testing, an unmet and increasing demand for genetic counseling services, social and economic disparities in access, impact on groups living with disabling conditions, and provider liability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Parham
- School of Law, Department of Jurisprudence and Social Policy, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Marsha Michie
- School of Nursing, Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Megan Allyse
- Biomedical Ethics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chen SC, Wasserman DT. A Framework for Unrestricted Prenatal Whole-Genome Sequencing: Respecting and Enhancing the Autonomy of Prospective Parents. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2017; 17:3-18. [PMID: 27996923 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1251632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Noninvasive, prenatal whole genome sequencing (NIPW) may be a technological reality in the near future, making available a vast array of genetic information early in pregnancy at no risk to the fetus or mother. Many worry that the timing, safety, and ease of the test will lead to informational overload and reproductive consumerism. The prevailing response among commentators has been to restrict conditions eligible for testing based on medical severity, which imposes disputed value judgments and devalues those living with eligible conditions. To avoid these difficulties, we propose an unrestricted testing policy, under which prospective parents could obtain information on any variant of known significance after a careful informed consent process that uses an interactive decision aid to deliver a mandatory presentation on the purposes, techniques, and limitations of genomic testing, as well as optional resources for reflection and consultation. This process would encourage thoughtful, informed deliberation by prospective parents before deciding whether or how to use NIPW.
Collapse
|
29
|
Korngiebel DM, McMullen CK, Amendola LM, Berg JS, Davis JV, Gilmore MJ, Harding CO, Himes P, Jarvik GP, Kauffman TL, Kennedy KA, Simpson DK, Leo MC, Lynch FL, Quigley DI, Reiss JA, Richards CS, Rope AF, Schneider JL, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS. Generating a taxonomy for genetic conditions relevant to reproductive planning. Am J Med Genet A 2016; 170:565-73. [PMID: 26889673 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2015] [Accepted: 10/22/2015] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
As genome or exome sequencing (hereafter genome-scale sequencing) becomes more integrated into standard care, carrier testing is an important possible application. Carrier testing using genome-scale sequencing can identify a large number of conditions, but choosing which conditions/genes to evaluate as well as which results to disclose can be complicated. Carrier testing generally occurs in the context of reproductive decision-making and involves patient values in a way that other types of genetic testing may not. The Kaiser Permanente Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research program is conducting a randomized clinical trial of preconception carrier testing that allows participants to select their preferences for results from among broad descriptive categories rather than selecting individual conditions. This paper describes (1) the criteria developed by the research team, the return of results committee (RORC), and stakeholders for defining the categories; (2) the process of refining the categories based on input from patient focus groups and validation through a patient survey; and (3) how the RORC then assigned specific gene-condition pairs to taxonomy categories being piloted in the trial. The development of four categories (serious, moderate/mild, unpredictable, late onset) for sharing results allows patients to select results based on their values without separately deciding their interest in knowing their carrier status for hundreds of conditions. A fifth category, lifespan limiting, was always shared. The lessons learned may be applicable in other results disclosure situations, such as incidental findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane M Korngiebel
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Carmit K McMullen
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Laura M Amendola
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jonathan S Berg
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - James V Davis
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Medical Genetics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Cary O Harding
- Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Patricia Himes
- Department of Medical Genetics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Kathleen A Kennedy
- Department of Perinatal Services, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Michael C Leo
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Frances L Lynch
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Denise I Quigley
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Jacob A Reiss
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - C Sue Richards
- Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Alan F Rope
- Department of Medical Genetics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | | | | | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatrics Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.,Division of Bioethics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kihlbom U. Ethical issues in preconception genetic carrier screening. Ups J Med Sci 2016; 121:295-298. [PMID: 27388477 PMCID: PMC5098496 DOI: 10.1080/03009734.2016.1189470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2016] [Revised: 04/29/2016] [Accepted: 05/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Population-based preconception genetic carrier screening programmes (PCS) with expanded panels are currently being developed in the Netherlands. This form of genetic screening for recessive traits differs from other forms of genetic testing and screening in that it is offered to persons not known to have an increased risk of being carriers of genetic traits for severe recessive diseases and in that they include tests for a large number of traits, potentially several hundred. This raises several ethical issues around justice, consequences, and autonomy. It will be argued that most of these ethical problems call for cautious reflection when setting up PCS and similar programmes within preconception care. It is moreover argued that it is ethically problematic to have an official aim and failing to mention possibly legitimate public aims that actually drive the development of PCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrik Kihlbom
- a Center for Research Ethics and Bioethics , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Beulen L, van den Berg M, Faas BH, Feenstra I, Hageman M, van Vugt JM, Bekker MN. The effect of a decision aid on informed decision-making in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Hum Genet 2016; 24:1409-16. [PMID: 27189020 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2016] [Revised: 03/14/2016] [Accepted: 04/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Early in pregnancy women and their partners face the complex decision on whether or not to participate in prenatal testing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Several studies show that the majority of pregnant women currently do not make informed decisions regarding prenatal testing. As the range of prenatal tests is expanding due to the development of new techniques such as non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), autonomous reproductive decision-making is increasingly challenging. In this study, a randomised controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of a web-based multimedia decision aid on decision-making regarding prenatal testing. The decision aid provided both written and audiovisual information on prenatal tests currently available, that is, prenatal screening by first-trimester combined testing, NIPT and invasive diagnostic testing through chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis. Furthermore, it contained values clarification exercises encouraging pregnant women to reflect on the potential harms and benefits of having prenatal tests performed. The use of the decision aid improved informed decision-making regarding prenatal testing. Of pregnant women allocated to the intervention group (n=130) 82.3% made an informed choice compared with 66.4% of women in the control group (n=131), P=0.004. As the vast majority of pregnant women made decisions consistent with their attitudes towards having prenatal testing performed, this improvement in informed decision-making could be attributed mainly to an increase in decision-relevant knowledge. This study shows that the implementation of a web-based multimedia decision aid directly facilitates the ultimate goal of prenatal testing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities, which is enabling informed autonomous reproductive choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lean Beulen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michelle van den Berg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Brigitte Hw Faas
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ilse Feenstra
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - John Mg van Vugt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Should I Perform Genetic Testing? A Qualitative Look into the Decision Making Considerations of Religious Israeli Undergraduate Students. J Genet Couns 2016; 25:1093-115. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9942-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2015] [Accepted: 02/25/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
33
|
Abstract
Prenatal diagnosis and screening have undergone rapid development in recent years, with advances in molecular technology driving the change. Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Down syndrome as a highly sensitive screening test is now available worldwide through the commercial sector with many countries moving toward implementation into their publically funded maternity systems. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) can now be performed for definitive diagnosis of some recessive and X-linked conditions, rather than just paternally inherited dominant and de novo conditions. NIPD/T offers pregnant couples greater choice during their pregnancy as these safer methods avoid the risk of miscarriage associated with invasive testing. As the cost of sequencing falls and technology develops further, there may well be potential for whole exome and whole genome sequencing of the unborn fetus using cell-free DNA in the maternal plasma. How such assays can or should be implemented into the clinical setting remain an area of significant debate, but it is clear that the progress made to date for safer prenatal testing has been welcomed by expectant couples and their healthcare professionals.
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Across the span of the last 75+ years, technological and conceptual advances in genetics have found rapid implementation at the beginning of human life. From karyotype testing, to molecular cytogenetics, to gene panel testing, and now to whole exome and whole genome sequencing, each iterative expansion of our capability to acquire genetic data on the next generation has been implemented quickly in the clinical setting. In tandem, our continuously expanding ability to acquire large volumes of genetic data has generated its own challenges in terms of interpretation, clinical utility of the information, and concerns over privacy and discrimination; for the first time, we are faced with the possibility of having complete access to our genetic data from birth, if not shortly after conception. Here, we discuss the evolution of the field toward this new reality and we consider the potentially far-reaching consequences and, at present, an unclear path toward developing best practices for implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ludmila Francescatto
- Center for Human Disease Modeling, Duke University School of Medicine, 300 N Duke St, Durham, NC 27701
| | - Nicholas Katsanis
- Center for Human Disease Modeling, Duke University School of Medicine, 300 N Duke St, Durham, NC 27701.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Dondorp W, de Wert G, Bombard Y, Bianchi DW, Bergmann C, Borry P, Chitty LS, Fellmann F, Forzano F, Hall A, Henneman L, Howard HC, Lucassen A, Ormond K, Peterlin B, Radojkovic D, Rogowski W, Soller M, Tibben A, Tranebjærg L, van El CG, Cornel MC. Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening. Eur J Hum Genet 2015; 23:1438-50. [PMID: 25782669 PMCID: PMC4613463 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 191] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2014] [Revised: 02/15/2015] [Accepted: 02/19/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper contains a joint ESHG/ASHG position document with recommendations regarding responsible innovation in prenatal screening with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). By virtue of its greater accuracy and safety with respect to prenatal screening for common autosomal aneuploidies, NIPT has the potential of helping the practice better achieve its aim of facilitating autonomous reproductive choices, provided that balanced pretest information and non-directive counseling are available as part of the screening offer. Depending on the health-care setting, different scenarios for NIPT-based screening for common autosomal aneuploidies are possible. The trade-offs involved in these scenarios should be assessed in light of the aim of screening, the balance of benefits and burdens for pregnant women and their partners and considerations of cost-effectiveness and justice. With improving screening technologies and decreasing costs of sequencing and analysis, it will become possible in the near future to significantly expand the scope of prenatal screening beyond common autosomal aneuploidies. Commercial providers have already begun expanding their tests to include sex-chromosomal abnormalities and microdeletions. However, multiple false positives may undermine the main achievement of NIPT in the context of prenatal screening: the significant reduction of the invasive testing rate. This document argues for a cautious expansion of the scope of prenatal screening to serious congenital and childhood disorders, only following sound validation studies and a comprehensive evaluation of all relevant aspects. A further core message of this document is that in countries where prenatal screening is offered as a public health programme, governments and public health authorities should adopt an active role to ensure the responsible innovation of prenatal screening on the basis of ethical principles. Crucial elements are the quality of the screening process as a whole (including non-laboratory aspects such as information and counseling), education of professionals, systematic evaluation of all aspects of prenatal screening, development of better evaluation tools in the light of the aim of the practice, accountability to all stakeholders including children born from screened pregnancies and persons living with the conditions targeted in prenatal screening and promotion of equity of access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wybo Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Guido de Wert
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital & Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Diana W Bianchi
- Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carsten Bergmann
- Center for Human Genetics Bioscientia, Ingelheim, Germany
- Department of Medicine, University Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Leuven University, Belgium
| | - Lyn S Chitty
- Clinical and Molecular Genetics Unit, UCL Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital and UCLH NHS Foundations Trusts, London, UK
| | - Florence Fellmann
- Service of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Lidewij Henneman
- Section Community Genetics, Department of Clinical Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Heidi C Howard
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anneke Lucassen
- Department of Clinical Ethics and Law (CELS), University of Southampton and Wessex Clinical Genetic Service, Southampton, UK
| | - Kelly Ormond
- Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Borut Peterlin
- Clinical Institute of Medical Genetics, Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Dragica Radojkovic
- Laboratory for Molecular Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering (IMGGE), University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Wolf Rogowski
- Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt, Helmholtz Zentrum, München, Germany
| | - Maria Soller
- Division Clinical Genetics, University and Regional Laboratories Region Skåne, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Aad Tibben
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lisbeth Tranebjærg
- Department of Audiology, Bispebjerg Hospital/Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Genetics, The Kennedy Center, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Institute of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, ICMM, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Carla G van El
- Section Community Genetics, Department of Clinical Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Section Community Genetics, Department of Clinical Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Work environment facilitators to the availability of complementary and alternative therapies in perinatal hospices. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2015; 17:391-396. [PMID: 26877713 DOI: 10.1097/njh.0000000000000167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Increasingly, patients and clinicians are considering palliative care interventions during pregnancy for the maternal-fetal dyad, when a life-limiting diagnosis is confirmed. Nurses are at the forefront of providing hospice and palliative care that includes planning interventions for infants nearing the end of life. However, little is known about the work environment facilitators to the availability of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies. Using a national database of perinatal hospice and palliative care providers, we described the types of CAM therapies available and explored the influence of the nurse work environment on the availability of CAM therapies with multivariate regression analysis. This study showed that having an education environment where clinicians are trained, along with a highly educated RN support staff, and a BSN educated staff were critical to the availability of CAM therapies. The clinical implications for hospice and palliative nurses caring for infants and their families were discussed.
Collapse
|
37
|
Silcock C, Liao L, Hill M, Chitty LS. Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome undermine informed choice? Health Expect 2015; 18:1658-71. [PMID: 26039796 PMCID: PMC5060845 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/28/2013] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether the introduction of non-invasive pre-natal testing for Down's syndrome (DS) has the potential to undermine informed choice. PARTICIPANTS Three hundred and ninety-three health professionals; 523 pregnant women. METHODS A cross-sectional questionnaire study across nine maternity units and three conferences in the UK designed to assess opinions regarding test delivery and how information should be communicated to women when offered Down's syndrome screening (DSS) or diagnosis using invasive (IDT) or non-invasive testing (NIPT). RESULTS Both pregnant women and health professionals in the NIPT and DSS groups were less likely than the IDT group to consider that testing should take place at a return visit or that obtaining written consent was necessary, and more likely to think testing should be carried out routinely. Compared to health professionals, pregnant women expressed a stronger preference for testing to occur on the same day as pre-test counselling (P = 0.000) and for invasive testing to be offered routinely (P = 0.000). They were also more likely to indicate written consent as necessary for DSS (P = 0.000) and NIPT (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Health professionals and pregnant women view the consenting process differently across antenatal test types. These differences suggest that informed choice may be undermined with the introduction of NIPT for DS into clinical practice. To maintain high standards of care, effective professional training programmes and practice guidelines are needed which prioritize informed consent and take into account the views and needs of service users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Silcock
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & UCL Institute for Women's HealthLondonUK
| | - Lih‐Mei Liao
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & UCL Institute for Women's HealthLondonUK
| | - Melissa Hill
- UCL Institute of Child HealthGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, and Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Lyn S. Chitty
- UCL Institute of Child HealthLondonUK
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust and Fetal Medicine UnitUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Dondorp W, Page-Christiaens G, de Wert G. Genomic futures of prenatal screening: ethical reflection. Clin Genet 2015; 89:531-8. [DOI: 10.1111/cge.12640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2015] [Revised: 07/07/2015] [Accepted: 07/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- W.J. Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Research Schools GROW, CAPHRI; Maastricht University; Maastricht The Netherlands
| | - G.C.M.L. Page-Christiaens
- Wilhelmina Children's Hospital Birth Centre; Utrecht University Medical Centre; Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - G.M.W.R de Wert
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Research Schools GROW, CAPHRI; Maastricht University; Maastricht The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ramdaney A, Hashmi SS, Monga M, Carter R, Czerwinski J. Support Desired by Women Following Termination of Pregnancy for a Fetal Anomaly. J Genet Couns 2015; 24:952-60. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9832-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2014] [Accepted: 03/10/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
40
|
van Schendel RV, Dondorp WJ, Timmermans DRM, van Hugte EJH, de Boer A, Pajkrt E, Lachmeijer AMA, Henneman L. NIPT-based screening for Down syndrome and beyond: what do pregnant women think? Prenat Diagn 2015; 35:598-604. [PMID: 25693726 DOI: 10.1002/pd.4579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2015] [Revised: 02/10/2015] [Accepted: 02/12/2015] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study is to study pregnant women's views on noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Down syndrome and the potential to test for a broader range of conditions. METHODS An online questionnaire available on the Dutch pregnancy fair website was completed by 381 pregnant women. RESULTS Of the women, 51% expressed interest in having NIPT, including 33% of women who had declined first-trimester screening. The majority (73%) thought that the uptake of screening would increase with NIPT. Most women agreed that testing for life-threatening (89%), severe physical (79%), or severe mental (76%) disorders should be offered. A minority (29%) felt that prenatal screening should also be offered for late-onset disorders. Most (41%) preferred to have a free choice from a list of disorders, 31% preferred a 'closed offer', and 26% preferred choosing between packages of disorders. Although most women (76%) thought that screening for a broad range of conditions would avoid much suffering, 39% feared that it would confront couples with choices, the implications of which would be difficult to grasp. CONCLUSION The results suggest that the uptake of screening will increase with NIPT. If NIPT will be offered for a broad range of conditions, it is crucial to find a way that facilitates rather than undermines well-informed decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachèl V van Schendel
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wybo J Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Research Institutes GROW and CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Danielle R M Timmermans
- EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eline J H van Hugte
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne de Boer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eva Pajkrt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fetal Medicine Unit, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Augusta M A Lachmeijer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Michie M, Allyse M. Old Questions, New Paradigms: Ethical, Legal, and Social Complications of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2015; 6:1-4. [PMID: 26185771 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2014.993440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marsha Michie
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California San Francisco
| | - Megan Allyse
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Toews M, Caulfield T. Physician liability and non-invasive prenatal testing. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2015; 36:907-914. [PMID: 25375305 DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30441-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Although non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) marks a notable development in the field of prenatal genetic testing, there are some physician liability considerations raised by this technology. As NIPT is still emerging as the standard of care and is just starting to receive provincial funding, the question arises of whether physicians are obligated to disclose the availability of NIPT to eligible patients as part of the physician-patient discussion about prenatal screening and diagnosis. If NIPT is discussed with patients, it is important to disclose the limitations of this technology with respect to its accuracy and the number of disorders that it can detect when compared with invasive diagnostic options. A failure to sufficiently disclose these limitations could leave patients with false assurances about the health of their fetuses and could raise informed consent and liability issues, particularly if a child is born with a disability as a result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maeghan Toews
- Health Law Institute, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB
| | - Timothy Caulfield
- Health Law Institute, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB; School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Joly D, Béroud C, Grünfeld JP. Rare inherited disorders with renal involvement-approach to the patient. Kidney Int 2015; 87:901-8. [PMID: 25651365 DOI: 10.1038/ki.2014.432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2014] [Revised: 08/14/2014] [Accepted: 08/21/2014] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The list of rare inherited disorders with renal involvement is rapidly growing. Many are single gene diseases affecting children, but cases are not restricted to pediatrics and diagnosis is often difficult and delayed. The expanding use of next-generation sequencing techniques is expected to discover new diseases, to challenge the definition of rarity, to accelerate and shake up our diagnostic paradigms, to promote 'deep phenotyping', and ultimately improve disease ontology. Rare renal diseases are exemplary of a transition from pediatric to adult-type care and pluridisciplinary approach, necessitating cooperation between geneticists, nephropediatricians, adult nephrologists, other physicians, nurses, social workers, and dietitians. They have raised new ethical issues, not only in genetic counseling, but also in public health, regarding equity, and distribution of care. Patient's organizations have grown and have been very active to promote information and research. Efforts are underway to create interoperable patient's registries and ultimately worldwide networks gathering patients, researchers, clinicians, pharmaceutical industry, and health authorities. Progress in genetics and pathophysiological mechanisms will hopefully increase the number of efficient orphan medicinal products. Finally, new frontiers set by rare nephropathies may improve the understanding, treatments, and outcomes of more frequent renal diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominique Joly
- 1] Service de Néphrologie, Université Paris-Descartes, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Paris, France [2] INSERM U845, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Béroud
- 1] Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France [2] Département de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital d'enfants Timone, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Grünfeld
- Service de Néphrologie, Université Paris-Descartes, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Allyse M, Minear MA, Berson E, Sridhar S, Rote M, Hung A, Chandrasekharan S. Non-invasive prenatal testing: a review of international implementation and challenges. Int J Womens Health 2015; 7:113-26. [PMID: 25653560 PMCID: PMC4303457 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s67124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 207] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Noninvasive prenatal genetic testing (NIPT) is an advance in the detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies that analyzes cell-free fetal DNA in the blood of a pregnant woman. Since its introduction to clinical practice in Hong Kong in 2011, NIPT has quickly spread across the globe. While many professional societies currently recommend that NIPT be used as a screening method, not a diagnostic test, its high sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (true negative rate) make it an attractive alternative to the serum screens and invasive tests currently in use. Professional societies also recommend that NIPT be accompanied by genetic counseling so that families can make informed reproductive choices. If NIPT becomes more widely adopted, States will have to implement regulation and oversight to ensure it fits into existing legal frameworks, with particular attention to returning fetal sex information in areas where sex-based abortions are prevalent. Although there are additional challenges for NIPT uptake in the developing world, including the lack of health care professionals and infrastructure, the use of NIPT in low-resource settings could potentially reduce the need for skilled clinicians who perform invasive testing. Future advances in NIPT technology promise to expand the range of conditions that can be detected, including single gene disorders. With these advances come questions of how to handle incidental findings and variants of unknown significance. Moving forward, it is essential that all stakeholders have a voice in crafting policies to ensure the ethical and equitable use of NIPT across the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Allyse
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Elisa Berson
- Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Shilpa Sridhar
- Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Margaret Rote
- Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Anthony Hung
- Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Nævdal E. Optimal screening for genetic diseases. ECONOMICS AND HUMAN BIOLOGY 2014; 15:129-139. [PMID: 25203815 DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2014.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2014] [Revised: 08/13/2014] [Accepted: 08/13/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Screening for genetic diseases is performed in many regions and/or ethnic groups where there is a high prevalence of possibly malign genes. The propagation of such genes can be considered a dynamic externality. Given that many of these diseases are untreatable and give rise to truly tragic outcomes, they are a source of societal concern, and the screening process should perhaps be regulated. This paper incorporates a standard model of genetic propagation into an economic model of dynamic management to derive cost benefit rules for optimal screening. The highly non-linear nature of genetic dynamics gives rise to perhaps surprising results that include discontinuous controls and threshold effects. One insight is that any screening program that is in place for any amount of time should screen all individuals in a target population. The incorporation of genetic models may prove to be useful to several emerging fields in economics such as genoeconomics, neuroeconomics and paleoeconomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Nævdal
- The Ragnar Frisch Centre for Economic Research, University of Oslo, Gaustadalléen 21, N-0349 Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
van der Steen SL, Diderich KEM, Riedijk SR, Verhagen-Visser J, Govaerts LCP, Joosten M, Knapen MFCM, Van Opstal D, Srebniak MI, Tibben A, Galjaard RJH. Pregnant couples at increased risk for common aneuploidies choose maximal information from invasive genetic testing. Clin Genet 2014; 88:25-31. [PMID: 25134982 DOI: 10.1111/cge.12479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2014] [Revised: 08/01/2014] [Accepted: 08/05/2014] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Genomic array detects more pathogenic chromosome aberrations than conventional karyotyping (CK), including genetic variants associated with a susceptibility for neurodevelopmental disorders; susceptibility loci (SL). Consensus regarding the scope of invasive prenatal diagnosis (PND) pregnant couples should be offered is lacking. This study examined pregnant couples' preferences, doubts and satisfaction regarding the scope of invasive PND. Eighty-two couples choosing prenatal screening (PNS) and 59 couples choosing invasive PND were offered a choice between 5 (comparable to CK) and 0.5 Mb resolution array analysis outcomes, the latter with or without reporting SL. A pre-test self-report questionnaire and post-test telephone interview assessed their choices in-depth. Actual (PND) and hypothetical (PNS) choices differed significantly (p < 0.001). Ninety-five percent of the couples in the PND group chose 0.5 Mb array, vs 69% in the PNS group. Seven percent of the PND group wished not to be informed of SL. Ninety percent was satisfied with their choice and wished to decide about the scope themselves. Pregnant couples wish to make their own choices regarding the scope of invasive PND. It therefore seems justified to offer them a choice in both the resolution of array and disclosure of SL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - M F C M Knapen
- Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Foundation of Prenatal Screening South-West, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - A Tibben
- Department Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lewis C, Choudhury M, Chitty LS. ‘Hope for safe prenatal gene tests’. A content analysis of how the UK press media are reporting advances in non-invasive prenatal testing. Prenat Diagn 2014; 35:420-7. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.4488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2014] [Revised: 08/21/2014] [Accepted: 08/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Celine Lewis
- Clinical and Molecular Genetics; UCL Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
| | - Mahrufa Choudhury
- Clinical and Molecular Genetics; UCL Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
| | - Lyn S. Chitty
- Clinical and Molecular Genetics; UCL Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
- Fetal Medicine Unit; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Jafri H, Hewison J, Sheridan E, Ahmed S. Acceptability of prenatal testing and termination of pregnancy in Pakistan. J Community Genet 2014; 6:29-37. [PMID: 25081227 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-014-0198-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2014] [Accepted: 07/21/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to assess acceptability of prenatal testing (PNT) and termination of pregnancy (TOP) for a range of conditions in Pakistani parents with and without a child with a genetic condition. A structured questionnaire assessing acceptability of PNT and TOP for 30 conditions was completed by 400 Pakistani participants: 200 parents with a child with a genetic condition (100 fathers and 100 mothers) and 200 parents without an affected child (100 fathers and 100 mothers). There was a high level of interest in PNT, where over 80 % of parents in all four study groups would want PNT for the majority of the conditions. There was comparatively less interest in TOP for the same conditions (ranging from 5 to 70 % of parents, with mothers of an affected child being most interested). Parents were most likely to be interested in TOP for conditions at the serious end of the continuum. More than half of the participants in each group would consider TOP for anencephaly and quadriplegia. The interest in PNT and TOP for a range of conditions suggests that rapidly developing PNT technologies are likely to be acceptable in Pakistan, a low-middle income level and Muslim country. The comparatively lower level of interest in TOP for the same conditions highlights ethical dilemmas that such technologies are likely to raise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Jafri
- Genetech Laboratory, 146/1 Shadman Jail Road, Lahore, Pakistan
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Attitudes towards non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy among US adults of reproductive age. J Perinatol 2014; 34:429-34. [PMID: 24603453 PMCID: PMC4399855 DOI: 10.1038/jp.2014.30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2013] [Revised: 01/19/2014] [Accepted: 01/27/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine how adults in the United States view non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA testing) in order to help estimate uptake. STUDY DESIGN A national sample of 1861 US-based adults was surveyed using a validated online survey instrument. The survey was administered by a commercial survey research company. Respondents were randomized to receive a survey about prenatal testing for trisomy 13 and 18 or trisomy 21. Participants were asked to select among testing modalities, including cffDNA testing, and rank the features of testing that they considered most important to decision making. RESULT There was substantive interest in the use of cffDNA testing rather than traditional screening mechanisms, with a minority of respondents reporting that they would support the use of both methods in combination. The lower rates of false-negative and false-positive test results and the ability to use the test earlier in the pregnancy were the most highly rated benefits of cffDNA testing. Participants expressed strong support for diagnostic confirmation via invasive testing after a positive result from either screening or cffDNA testing. However, almost one-third of participants reported that they would not endorse the use of either invasive or non-invasive prenatal testing. CONCLUSION There appears to be support for uptake of non-invasive prenatal tests. Clinical guidelines should therefore go forward in providing guidance on how to integrate non-invasive methods into the current standard of care. However, our findings indicate that even when accuracy, which is rated by patients as the most important aspect of prenatal testing, is significantly improved over existing screening methods and testing is offered non-invasively, the number of individuals who reported that they would decline any testing remained the same. Attention should therefore be directed at ensuring that the right of informed refusal of prenatal testing is not impacted by new, non-invasive methods.
Collapse
|
50
|
Client Views and Attitudes to Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis for Sickle Cell Disease, Thalassaemia and Cystic Fibrosis. J Genet Couns 2014; 23:1012-21. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9725-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2013] [Accepted: 04/09/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|