Epidemiology: Time to revisit the concept of reactive arthritis

Knowledge and Perceptions of Reactive Arthritis Diagnosis and Management Among Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Online Survey

BACKGROUND

Reactive arthritis (ReA) is an often neglected disease that received some attention during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. There is some evidence that infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 can lead to "reactive" arthritis. However, this does not follow the classical definition of ReA that limits the organisms leading to this condition. Also, there is no recommendation by any international society on the management of ReA during the current pandemic. Thus, a survey was conducted to gather information about how modern clinicians across the world approach ReA.

METHODS

An e-survey was carried out based on convenient sampling via social media platforms. Twenty questions were validated on the pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and management of ReA. These also included information on post-COVID-19 arthritis. Duplicate entries were prevented and standard guidelines were followed for reporting internet-based surveys.

RESULTS

There were 193 respondents from 24 countries. Around one-fifth knew the classical definition of ReA. Nearly half considered the triad of conjunctivitis, urethritis and asymmetric oligoarthritis a "must" for diagnosis of ReA. Other common manifestations reported include enthesitis, dermatitis, dactylitis, uveitis, and oral or genital ulcers. Three-fourths opined that no test was specific for ReA. Drugs for ReA were non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, intra-articular injections, and conventional disease-modifying agents with less than 10% supporting biological use.

CONCLUSION

The survey brought out the gap in existing concepts of ReA. The current definition needs to be updated. There is an unmet need for consensus recommendations for the management of ReA, including the use of biologicals.

MRI and Sonography of the Knee in Acute Reactive Arthritis: An Observational Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Reactive arthritis (ReA) is a unique subgroup of spondyloarthritis with acute presentation and tendency to develop chronicity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has enabled identification of sensitive markers of response to therapy.

METHODS

A longitudinal pilot study of acute ReA with knee joint involvement satisfying the Braun's criteria was undertaken. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee was assessed at baseline, and agreement with ultrasonography was assessed. Clinical details were recorded using a detailed and structured case record form. Patients were followed up, and MRI predictors of transition to chronic arthritis were looked for.

RESULTS

In 25 patients with ReA, synovial thickening was the most common feature. Enthesitis was observed on MRI in 20%. Urethritis-related and HLA-B27-positive ReA had higher synovial thickening scores (p = 0.007). Agreement was poor between MRI and ultrasonography (synovial hypertrophy: k = 0.04). On follow-up, 34% (n = 7/21 for >12 months) continued to have active disease. None of the clinical or radiological features were predictive of chronicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Posturethritis and B27-positive ReA was more severe than postenteritis ReA and RA on MRI. One third develop chronic disease on follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging is superior to sonography, although baseline imaging is not predictive of chronicity. The results of this pilot exploratory study argue for larger studies on MRI in ReA.

A case report of monoarthritis in a COVID-19 patient and literature review: Simple actions for complex times

RATIONALE

COVID-19 presentation is multifaceted and up to 44% of patients affected by COVID-19 experience musculoskeletal complaints, mostly in the form of diffuse aspecific arthromyalgias. Nevertheless, only a few cases of arthritis following SARS-CoV2 infection are reported.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 27-year-old man affected by nail psoriasis presented with monoarthritis 2 weeks after being diagnosed with COVID-19.

DIAGNOSES

Diagnostic work-up and differential diagnosis were made difficult by patient isolation, absence of lab tests, and his visit via telemedicine, even though signs of first metacarpophalangeal joint involvement were clear.

INTERVENTIONS

Due to the inefficacy of acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, the patient was prescribed oral steroids with a rapid benefit.

OUTCOMES

The patient's response to oral steroid was prompt and maintained even after therapy tapering. Even so, a formal diagnosis was not possible due to a difficult diagnostic work-up and lack of a long-term follow-up.

LESSONS

Like many other viral diseases, SARS-CoV2 can play as a causative agent or as a trigger for inflammatory arthritis development in predisposed individuals.

Elucidating potential molecular signatures through host-microbe interactions for reactive arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease using combinatorial approach

Reactive Arthritis (ReA), a rare seronegative inflammatory arthritis, lacks exquisite classification under rheumatic autoimmunity. ReA is solely established using differential clinical diagnosis of the patient cohorts, where pathogenic triggers linked to enteric and urogenital microorganisms e.g. Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia, Campylobacter, Chlamydia have been reported. Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), an idiopathic enteric disorder co-evolved and attuned to present gut microbiome dysbiosis, can be correlated to the genesis of enteropathic arthropathies like ReA. Gut microbes symbolically modulate immune system homeostasis and are elementary for varied disease patterns in autoimmune disorders. The gut-microbiota axis structured on the core host-microbe interactions execute an imperative role in discerning the etiopathogenesis of ReA and IBD. This study predicts the molecular signatures for ReA with co-evolved IBD through the enveloped host-microbe interactions and microbe-microbe 'interspecies communication', using synonymous gene expression data for selective microbes. We have utilized a combinatorial approach that have concomitant in-silico work-pipeline and experimental validation to corroborate the findings. In-silico analysis involving text mining, metabolic network reconstruction, simulation, filtering, host-microbe interaction, docking and molecular mimicry studies results in robust drug target/s and biomarker/s for co-evolved IBD and ReA. Cross validation of the target/s or biomarker/s was done by targeted gene expression analysis following a non-probabilistic convenience sampling. Studies were performed to substantiate the host-microbe disease network consisting of protein-marker-symptom/disease-pathway-drug associations resulting in possible identification of vital drug targets, biomarkers, pathways and inhibitors for IBD and ReA.Our study identified Na(+)/H(+) anti-porter (NHAA) and Kynureninase (KYNU) to be robust early and essential host-microbe interacting targets for IBD co-evolved ReA. Other vital host-microbe interacting genes, proteins, pathways and drugs include Adenosine Deaminase (ADA), Superoxide Dismutase 2 (SOD2), Catalase (CAT), Angiotensin I Converting Enzyme (ACE), carbon metabolism (folate biosynthesis) and methotrexate. These can serve as potential prognostic/theranostic biomarkers and signatures that can be extrapolated to stratify ReA and related autoimmunity patient cohorts for further pilot studies.

Emerging role of metabolomics in rheumatology

The pursuit for understanding disease pathogenesis, in this age of rapid laboratory diagnostics and fast-paced research, has led scientists worldwide to take recourse in hypothesis-free approaches for molecular diagnosis. Metabolomics is one such powerful tool that explores comprehensibly the metabolic alternations in human diseases. It involves study of small molecules of less than 1 kD in size by either LSMS or nuclear magnetic resonance. Unlike genomics, which tells us what may have happened, metabolomics reflects what did happen. The NMR technique has an advantage of analyzing metabolites without sample preparation, thereby diminishing artifacts, is less cumbersome and with the latest database on Metabolome; about 30 000 metabolites can be identified. The study of metabolomics for several rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, osteoarthritis and vasculitis, has revealed distinctive metabolic signatures. Thus, metabolomics is a technique that promises precision medicine with better biomarkers, robust predictors of drug response and of disease outcome, discovery of newer metabolites and pathways in disease pathogenesis, and finally, targeted drug development. This review intends to decipher its relevance in common rheumatic diseases.

Potential risk factors for reactive arthritis and persistence of symptoms at 2 years: a case-control study with longitudinal follow-up

The objective of the study is to determine the risk factors for the development of reactive arthritis (ReA) and examine the factors associated with the persistence of symptoms. Patients with a new diagnosis of ReA and controls with a gastrointestinal (GI), urogenital, or sexually transmitted infection in the 3-6 months prior to study entry were prospectively enrolled in Guatemala City. ReA patients fulfilled the Assessment in Spondyloarthritis International Society criteria for peripheral spondyloarthropathy (SpA). Patients underwent history, examination, Achilles tendon ultrasound, and blood draw. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) type and serum biomarkers were measured. t tests and nonparametric equivalents were used to examine the association of clinical, laboratory, and imaging factors with ReA. Patients were contacted 2 years later to assess for persistence of symptoms. Study subjects included patients with ReA (N = 32) and controls (N = 32). ReA patients were most frequently infected in April whereas controls were most frequently infected in August. Two ReA patients and two controls were HLA-B27-positive. Serum cathepsin K and C-reactive protein were higher in ReA patients compared to controls (p = 0.03 for both), while total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein were lower (p = 0.008 and 0.045, respectively). Among those with ReA, 15 (47%) patients had continued symptoms at 2 years. These patients had a lower matrix metalloproteinase-3 level at diagnosis than patients for whom ReA resolved (p = 0.004). HLA-B27 was not associated with development of ReA in Guatemala; however, the month of infection was associated with ReA. The most striking finding was the persistence of arthritis at 2 years in nearly half of the patients.