Inhibiting nighttime melatonin and boosting cortisol increase patrolling monocytes, phagocytosis, and myelination in a murine model of multiple sclerosis

E2F1-driven CENPM expression promotes glycolytic reprogramming and tumorigenicity in glioblastoma

Centromere protein M (CENPM), traditionally associated with chromosome segregation, is now recognized for its significant role in cancer biology. Particularly in glioblastoma (GBM), where less is known about CENPM compared to other centromere proteins (CENPs), it appears crucially involved in regulating tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and metabolic reprogramming-key factors in GBM's aggressiveness. Initial analyses using the GEPIA database (TCGA/GTEx datasets) reveal distinct patterns of CENPM expression in GBM, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic target. Our study manipulated CENPM expression through shRNA-mediated knockdown and vector-based overexpression in GBM cell lines LN229 and U251. Knockdown resulted in a 50% reduction in cell proliferation and a 70% decrease in invasion, accompanied by diminished glycolytic markers such as glucose consumption, lactate production, and ATP levels. Conversely, overexpression of CENPM enhanced both metabolic activity and invasive capacities. The introduction of the glycolytic inhibitor 2-DG effectively reversed the effects of CENPM modulation, highlighting a dependency on glycolytic pathways. Moreover, we identified E2F1 as a key regulator of CENPM, linking it to GBM's metabolic alterations. In vivo studies using a BALB/c nude mouse xenograft model demonstrated that CENPM knockdown significantly inhibits tumor growth, with treated groups showing a 60% reduction in tumor volume over four weeks. These findings underscore the E2F1-CENPM axis as a promising target for therapeutic strategies, aiming to disrupt the metabolic and invasive pathways facilitated by CENPM in GBM. These insights establish a foundation for targeting the metabolic dependencies of tumor cells, potentially leading to innovative treatments for GBM.

Protective Activity of Melatonin Combinations and Melatonin-Based Hybrid Molecules in Neurodegenerative Diseases

The identification of protective agents for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases is the mainstay therapeutic goal to modify the disease course and arrest the irreversible disability progression. Pharmacological therapies synergistically targeting multiple pathogenic pathways, including oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and inflammation, are prime candidates for neuroprotection. Combination or synergistic therapy with melatonin, whose decline correlates with altered sleep/wake cycle and impaired glymphatic "waste clearance" system in neurodegenerative diseases, has a great therapeutic potential to treat inflammatory neurodegenerative states. Despite the protective outcomes observed in preclinical studies, mild or poor outcomes were observed in clinical settings, suggesting that melatonin combinations promoting synergistic actions at appropriate doses might be more suitable to treat multifactorial neurodegenerative disorders. In this review, we first summarize the key melatonin actions and pathways contributing to cell protection and its therapeutic implication in Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and multiple sclerosis (MS). We remark the major controversies in the field, mostly generated by the lack of a common consensus for the optimal dosing, molecular targets, and toxicity. Then, we review the literature investigating the efficacy of melatonin combinations with approved or investigational neuroprotective agents and of melatonin-containing hybrid molecules, both in vitro and in animal models of AD, PD, and MS, as well as the efficacy of add-on melatonin in clinical settings. We highlight the rationale for such melatonin combinations with a focus on the comparison with single-agent treatment and on the assays in which an additive or a synergistic effect has been achieved. We conclude that a better characterization of the mechanisms underlying such melatonin synergistic actions under neuroinflammation at appropriate doses needs to be tackled to advance successful clinical translation of neuroprotective melatonin combination therapies or melatonin-based hybrid molecules.

Impact of oral melatonin supplementation on urine and serum melatonin concentrations and quality-of-life measures in persons with relapsing multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Melatonin is an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent that modulates the immune system by scavenging free radicals, reducing the upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and reducing transendothelial cell migration. Therefore, melatonin may play a role in regulating multiple sclerosis (MS) disease activity. However, little is known about how melatonin supplementation effects individuals with MS.

OBJECTIVE

Determine if there was a dose-dependent elevation in urine and serum melatonin concentrations. Determine if melatonin supplementation had an impact on patient reported outcomes.

METHODS

This was a randomized, dose-blinded exploratory study. Adults (age 18-65) with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS) treated with a stable dose of oral disease modifying therapy for at least 6 months were randomized into melatonin 3 mg or 5 mg daily. Urinary and serum melatonin levels and modified fatigue impact scale (MFIS), multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29), and Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), patient determined disease steps (PDDS) and performance scales (PS) were measured at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Urinary and serum melatonin analyses was performed to estimate mean concentrations and their differences between treatment arms over time by a repeated measures linear mixed model. The model included treatment, assessment time, and treatment × time interaction.

RESULTS

Thirty patients, randomized 1:1, were analyzed in an intent to treat population. Twenty-three completed the study. The repeated measures linear mixed model analysis of all timepoints revealed higher melatonin concentrations in patients on 5 mg compared to 3 mg melatonin for both urinary 6-SMT (p = 0.03) and serum melatonin (p = 0.04). MFIS, MSIS-29, PSQI, and PDSS-PS scores did not significantly change from baseline to month 12. No significant differences in these measures were seen between the two doses. Five patients stopped melatonin (three on 5 mg and two on 3 mg) due to adverse events, including one patient who developed focal spongiotic dermatitis. One patient experienced three consecutive serious adverse events that were unrelated to melatonin supplementation.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5 mg melatonin supplementation group had higher concentrations of urinary 6-SMT and serum melatonin compared to the 3 mg group over 12 months of treatment. There was a correlation between 6-SMT and serum melatonin concentrations. This suggests that measuring serum melatonin is a reliable alternative to measuring urinary 6-SMT. However, no differences in clinical benefit between the two dosage groups were demonstrated in the patient reported outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03498131.

Melatonin and brain barriers: The protection conferred by melatonin to the blood-brain barrier and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier

The blood-brain barrier and the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier separate the blood from brain tissue and cerebrospinal fluid. These brain barriers are important to maintain homeostasis and complex functions by protecting the brain from xenobiotics and harmful endogenous compounds. The disruption of brain barriers is a characteristic of neurologic diseases. Melatonin is a lipophilic hormone that is mainly produced by the pineal gland. The blood-brain barrier and the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers are melatonin-binding sites. Among the several melatonin actions, the most characteristic one is the regulation of sleep-wake cycles, melatonin has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Since brain barriers disruption can arise from inflammation and oxidative stress, knowing the influence of melatonin on the integrity of brain barriers is extremely important. Therefore, the objective of this review is to gather and discuss the available literature about the regulation of brain barriers by melatonin.

The Physiological Impact of Melatonin, Its Effect on the Course of Diseases and Their Therapy and the Effect of Magnetic Fields on Melatonin Secretion-Potential Common Pathways of Influence

Melatonin is a relic, due to its millions-of-years-old presence in chemical reactions, found in evolutionarily diverse organisms. It has a multidirectional biological function. It controls diurnal rhythms, redox homeostasis, intestinal motor functions, mitochondrial biogenesis and fetal development and has antioxidant effects. It also has analgesic and therapeutic effects. The purpose of this paper is to describe the role of melatonin in vital processes occurring in interaction with the environment, with particular reference to various magnetic fields ubiquitous in the life of animate matter, especially radio frequency/extra low frequency (RF/ELF EMF) and static magnetic fields. The most important part of this article is to describe the potential effects of magnetic fields on melatonin secretion and the resulting possible health effects. Melatonin in some cases positively amplifies the electromagnetic signal, intensifying health effects, such as neurogenesis, analgesic effects or lowering blood pressure. In other cases, it is a stimulus that inhibits the processes of destruction and aggravation of lesions. Sometimes, however, in contrast to the beneficial effects of electromagnetic fields in therapy, they intensify pathogenic effects, as in multiple sclerosis by intensifying the inflammatory process.

Bioactive Compounds and Their Influence on Postnatal Neurogenesis

Since postnatal neurogenesis was revealed to have significant implications for cognition and neurological health, researchers have been increasingly exploring the impact of natural compounds on this process, aiming to uncover strategies for enhancing brain plasticity. This review provides an overview of postnatal neurogenesis, neurogenic zones, and disorders characterized by suppressed neurogenesis and neurogenesis-stimulating bioactive compounds. Examining recent studies, this review underscores the multifaceted effects of natural compounds on postnatal neurogenesis. In essence, understanding the interplay between postnatal neurogenesis and natural compounds could bring novel insights into brain health interventions. Exploiting the therapeutic abilities of these compounds may unlock innovative approaches to enhance cognitive function, mitigate neurodegenerative diseases, and promote overall brain well-being.

Changes in Melatonin Concentration in a Clinical Observation Study under the Influence of Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields (Magnetic Stimulation in Men with Low Back Pain)-Results of Changes in an Eight-Point Circadian Profile

The aim of this study was to assess the changes in melatonin concentration under the influence of magnetic stimulation in men with low back pain. A total of 15 men were used in this study, divided into two groups. In Group 1, consisting of seven men, the M1P1 Viofor JPS program was used twice a day for 8 min, at 08:00 and 13:00. In Group 2, consisting of eight men, the M2P2 Viofor JPS program was used once a day for 12 min at 10:00. The application was subjected to the whole body of patients. The treatments in both groups lasted 3 weeks, for 5 days each week, with breaks on weekends. The diurnal melatonin profile was determined the day before exposure and the day after the last treatment, as well as at one-month follow-up. Blood samples were collected eight times a day. In both programs, magnetic stimulation did not reduce the nocturnal peak of melatonin concentration. After exposure, prolonged secretion of melatonin was observed until the morning hours. The impact of the magnetic field was maintained 1 month after the end of the application. The effect of the magnetic field was maintained for 1 month from the end of the application, which confirms the thesis about the occurrence of the phenomenon of biological hysteresis. The parameters of the magnetic fields, the application system, and the time and length of the application may affect the secretion of melatonin.

An overall view of the most common experimental models for multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex chronic disease with an unknown etiology. It is considered an inflammatory demyelinating and neurodegenerative disorder of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized, in most cases, by an unpredictable onset of relapse and remission phases. The disease generally starts in subjects under 40; it has a higher incidence in women and is described as a multifactorial disorder due to the interaction between genetic and environmental risk factors. Unfortunately, there is currently no definitive cure for MS. Still, therapies can modify the disease's natural history, reducing the relapse rate and slowing the progression of the disease or managing symptoms. The limited access to human CNS tissue slows down. It limits the progression of research on MS. This limit has been partially overcome over the years by developing various experimental models to study this disease. Animal models of autoimmune demyelination, such as experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and viral and toxin or transgenic MS models, represent the most significant part of MS research approaches. These models have now been complemented by ex vivo studies, using organotypic brain slice cultures and in vitro, through induced Pluripotent Stem cells (iPSCs). We will discuss which clinical features of the disorders might be reproduced and investigated in vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro in models commonly used in MS research to understand the processes behind the neuropathological events occurring in the CNS of MS patients. The primary purpose of this review is to give the reader a global view of the main paradigms used in MS research, spacing from the classical animal models to transgenic mice and 2D and 3D cultures.

Melatonin and vitamin D, two sides of the same coin, better to land on its edge to improve multiple sclerosis

Previous studies revealed a latitudinal gradient of multiple sclerosis (MS) prevalence, increasing by moving from the equator to the poles. The duration and quality of an individual's exposure to sunlight vary with latitude. Skin exposure to sunlight activates vitamin D synthesis, while light absence, as perceived by the eyes, activates melatonin synthesis in the pineal gland. Vitamin D or melatonin deficiency/insufficiency or overdose can occur at any latitude due to specific lifestyles and diets. Moving away from the equator, especially beyond 37°, decreases vitamin D while raising melatonin. Furthermore, melatonin synthesis increases in cold habitats like northern countries. Since melatonin's beneficial role was shown in MS, it is expected that northern countries whose individuals have higher endogenous melatonin should show a lower MS prevalence; however, these are ranked with the highest scores. In addition, countries like the United States and Canada have uncontrolled over-the-counter usage. In high latitudes, vitamin D deficiency and a higher MS prevalence persist even though vitamin D is typically compensated for by supplementation and not sunlight. Recently, we found that prolonged darkness increased MS melatonin levels, mimicking the long-term increase in northern countries. This caused a reduction in cortisol and increased infiltration, inflammation, and demyelination, which were all rescued by constant light therapy. In this review, we explain melatonin and vitamin D's possible roles in MS prevalence. The possible causes in northern countries are then discussed. Finally, we suggest strategies to treat MS by manipulating vitamin D and melatonin, preferably with sunlight or darkness, not supplements.