Automated 'oscillometric' blood pressure measuring devices: how they work and what they measure

Accuracy of methods to estimate central aortic SBP via upper arm cuff: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Central aortic BP may predict cardiovascular outcomes better than upper arm brachial BP. In recent years, technology has enabled central BP estimation by recording a peripheral BP waveform from a standard upper arm cuff. The accuracy of these devices is not well documented, and this study aimed to address this issue.

METHODS

This study was a systematic review, conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, of observational studies published between 2008 and 2023 that reported accuracy testing of cuff-based central BP devices, compared with reference invasive aortic BP. The primary analysis was stratified according to each commercially available device. Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models based on mean differences and standard errors.

RESULTS

Six thousand four hundred and fifteen studies were screened, and 27 studies met inclusion criteria (plus one unpublished study). This generated data for seven devices that are commercially available, which were tested among 2125 adult participants. There was very high heterogeneity when all devices were pooled ( I2  = 97.5%), and, when stratified by device, the accuracy of estimated central BP was highly device-dependent (range of accuracy across different devices -12.4 mmHg (-16.3 to -8.5) to 3.2 mmHg (0.2-6.1). Two of the seven commercially available devices had not undergone external validation testing.

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of commercially available cuff-based central BP devices is highly device-specific and not all are accurate for the estimation of central SBP. These findings have major implications for the appropriate interpretation of studies that use cuff-based estimated central BP.

Validation of two automatic sphygmomanometers according to the modified International Standardization Organization 81060-2:2018 protocol in adults with a mid-upper arm circumference of 22 centimeters or less

OBJECTIVE

A recent International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Task Group report calls for research to investingate potential special populations in validation studies of automated blood pressure (BP) devices. Accordingly, we aimed to determine the accuracy of two previously validated BP monitors passed in a general population when measured in adults with a mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) ≤ 22 cm.

METHODS

Test device A was the OMRON HEM 7121 equipped with the HEM CS24 cuff designed for an arm circumference of 17-22 cm. Test device B was the YuWell YE660Е with the YuWell '360°' cuff (18-36 cm). Data from 37 participants aged 20.14 ± 2.23 (18-28) years were analyzed according to criterion 1 of ISO Standard 81060-2 : 2018.

RESULTS

According to criterion 1, the mean ± SD of the BP differences for the device A was -7.81 ± 5.20/-10.66 ± 5.48 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) and for the device B was -8.00 ± 6.30/-16.11 ± 5.15 mmHg (systolic/diastolic), respectively. This means that neither device met the requirements.

CONCLUSION

Since devices A and B, which had passed in a general population study, failed in adults aged 18-28 years with an MUAC ≤ 22 cm, such individuals might be considered as new special population for validation studies.

Resonance sonomanometry for noninvasive, continuous monitoring of blood pressure

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. Existing methods for continuous, noninvasive blood pressure (BP) monitoring suffer from poor accuracy, uncomfortable form factors, or a need for frequent calibration, limiting their adoption. We introduce a new framework for continuous BP measurement that is noninvasive and calibration-free called resonance sonomanometry. The method uses ultrasound imaging to measure both the arterial dimensions and artery wall resonances that are induced by acoustic stimulation, which offers a direct measure of BP by a fully determined physical model. The approach and model are validated in vitro using arterial mock-ups and then in multiple arteries in human subjects. This approach offers the promise of robust continuous BP measurements, providing significant benefits for early diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Validation of a Suprasystolic Cuff System for Static and Dynamic Representation of the Central Pressure Waveform

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive pulse waveform analysis is valuable for central cardiovascular assessment, yet controversies persist over its validity in peripheral measurements. Our objective was to compare waveform features from a cuff system with suprasystolic blood pressure hold with an invasive aortic measurement.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study analyzed data from 88 subjects undergoing concurrent aortic catheterization and brachial pulse waveform acquisition using a suprasystolic blood pressure cuff system. Oscillometric blood pressure (BP) was compared with invasive aortic systolic BP and diastolic BP. Association between cuff and catheter waveform features was performed on a set of 15 parameters inclusive of magnitudes, time intervals, pressure-time integrals, and slopes of the pulsations. The evaluation covered both static (subject-averaged values) and dynamic (breathing-induced fluctuations) behaviors. Peripheral BP values from the cuff device were higher than catheter values (systolic BP-residual, 6.5 mm Hg; diastolic BP-residual, 12.4 mm Hg). Physiological correction for pressure amplification in the arterial system improved systolic BP prediction (r2=0.83). Dynamic calibration generated noninvasive BP fluctuations that reflect those invasively measured (systolic BP Pearson R=0.73, P<0.001; diastolic BP Pearson R=0.53, P<0.001). Static and dynamic analyses revealed a set of parameters with strong associations between catheter and cuff (Pearson R>0.5, P<0.001), encompassing magnitudes, timings, and pressure-time integrals but not slope-based parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the device and methods for peripheral waveform measurements presented here can be used for noninvasive estimation of central BP and a subset of aortic waveform features. These results serve as a benchmark for central cardiovascular assessment using suprasystolic BP cuff-based devices and contribute to preserving system dynamics in noninvasive measurements.

Smartphone-Based versus Non-Invasive Automatic Oscillometric Brachial Cuff Blood Pressure Measurements: A Prospective Method Comparison Volunteer Study

Introduction: Mobile health diagnostics have demonstrated effectiveness in detecting and managing chronic diseases. This method comparison study aims to assess the accuracy and precision of the previously evaluated OptiBP™ technology over a four-week study period. This device uses optical signals recorded by placing a patient's fingertip on a smartphone's camera to estimate blood pressure (BP). Methods: In adult participants without cardiac arrhythmias and minimal interarm blood pressure difference (systolic arterial pressure (SAP) < 15 mmHg or diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) < 10 mmHg), three pairs of 30 s BP measurements with the OptiBP™ (test method) were simultaneously compared using three pairs of measurements with the non-invasive oscillometric brachial cuff (reference method) on the opposite arm over a period of four consecutive weeks at a rate of two measurements per week (one in the morning and one in the afternoon). The agreement of BP values between the two technologies was analyzed using Bland-Altman and error grid analyses. The performance of the smartphone application was investigated using the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) definitions, which require the bias ± standard deviation (SD) between two technologies to be lower than 5 ± 8 mmHg. Results: Among the 65 eligible volunteers, 53 participants had adequate OptiBP™ BP values. In 12 patients, no OptiBP™ BP could be measured due to inadequate signals. Only nine participants had known chronic arterial hypertension and 76% of those patients were treated. The mean bias ± SD between both technologies was -1.4 mmHg ± 10.1 mmHg for systolic arterial pressure (SAP), 0.2 mmHg ± 6.5 mmHg for diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) and -0.5 mmHg ± 6.9 mmHg for mean arterial pressure (MAP). Error grid analyses indicated that 100% of the pairs of BP measurements were located in zones A (no risk) and B (low risk). Conclusions: In a cohort of volunteers, we observed an acceptable agreement between BP values obtained with the OptiBPTM and those obtained with the reference method over a four-week period. The OptiBPTM fulfills the ISO standards for MAP and DAP (but not SAP). The error grid analyses showed that 100% measurements were located in risk zones A and B. Despite the need for some technological improvements, this application may become an important tool to measure BP in the future.

Detecting and Managing Childhood Onset Hypertension in Africa: A Call to Action

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recent evidence on childhood hypertension across Africa, identifying knowledge gaps, challenges and priorities, and highlight clinical perspectives in managing primary hypertension.

RECENT FINDINGS

Only 15 of the 54 African countries reported on absolute blood pressure (BP) measures, elevated BP, pre- and/or hypertension. The reported hypertension prevalence ranged between 0.0 and 38.9%, while elevated BP and/or pre-hypertnesion ranged from 2.7 to 50.5%. Childhood BP nomograms are lacking across Africa and the rates of hypertension were based on guidelines developed in countries with the lowest to no number of children from African ancestry. The recent studies across Africa also showed little to no detail when reporting BP specific methodology. No recent data informing the use or effectiveness of antihypertensive agents in children and adolesents are available. Childhood hypertension is on the rise, while data from Africa remains vastly under-represented. Collaborative research, resources, and policies need to be strengthened in addressing the growing public health concern of childhood onset hypertension on this continent.

Accuracy of cuff blood pressure and systolic blood pressure amplification

Automated cuff measured blood pressure (BP) is the global standard used for diagnosing hypertension, but there are concerns regarding the accuracy of the method. Individual variability in systolic BP (SBP) amplification from central (aorta) to peripheral (brachial) arteries could be related to the accuracy of cuff BP, but this has never been determined and was the aim of this study. Automated cuff BP and invasive brachial BP were recorded in 795 participants (74% male, aged 64 ± 11 years) receiving coronary angiography at five independent research sites (using seven different automated cuff BP devices). SBP amplification was recorded invasively by catheter and defined as brachial SBP minus aortic SBP. Compared with invasive brachial SBP, cuff SBP was significantly underestimated (130 ± 18 mmHg vs. 138 ± 22 mmHg, p < 0.001). The level of SBP amplification varied significantly among individuals (mean ± SD, 7.3 ± 9.1 mmHg) and was similar to level of difference between cuff and invasive brachial SBP (mean difference -7.6 ± 11.9 mmHg). SBP amplification explained most of the variance in accuracy of cuff SBP (R2 = 19%). The accuracy of cuff SBP was greatest among participants with the lowest SBP amplification (ptrend < 0.001). After cuff BP values were corrected for SBP amplification, there was a significant improvement in the mean difference from the intra-arterial standard (p < 0.0001) and in the accuracy of hypertension classification according to 2017 ACC/AHA guideline thresholds (p = 0.005). The level of SBP amplification is a critical factor associated with the accuracy of conventional automated cuff measured BP.

A novel professional automated auscultatory blood pressure monitor with visual display of Korotkoff sounds: InBody BPBIO480KV validation according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard

OBJECTIVE

A novel automated auscultatory upper arm-cuff blood pressure (BP) monitor (InBody BPBIO480KV) for office use was developed. An electronic stethoscope embedded in the device cuff records the Korotkoff sounds, which are audible to the user and graphically displayed during cuff deflation. Automated BP measurements are provided, while allowing the user to assess the Korotkoff sounds. The device accuracy was tested using the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) and its Amendment 1.2020-01.

METHODS

Participants were recruited to fulfil the age, sex, BP, arm circumference and cuff distribution criteria of the Universal Standard in general population using the same arm sequential measurement method. Three cuffs of the test device were used for arm circumference 23-28, 28-35 and 33-42 cm.

RESULTS

Data from 85 individuals were analysed [mean age 57.3 ± 15.0 (SD) years, 53 men, arm circumference 23-42 cm]. For validation criterion 1, the mean ± SD of the differences between the test device and reference BP readings ( N  = 255) was 0.3 ± 5.5/0.6 ± 4.7 mmHg (systolic/diastolic; threshold ≤5 ± 8 mmHg). For criterion 2, the SD of the averaged BP differences per individual ( N  = 85) was 3.76/3.61 mmHg (systolic/diastolic; threshold ≤6.95/6.91 mmHg).

CONCLUSION

The InBody BPBIO480KV device for office use, which provides automated auscultatory measurements while reproducing and displaying the Korotkoff sounds, comfortably fulfilled the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard requirements in general population and can be recommended for clinical use. The assessment of Korotkoff sounds by healthcare professionals for evaluating the quality of automated measurements requires further evaluation.