1
|
Applebaum J, Humphries LA, Kravitz E, Taberski S, Koelper N, Gracia C, Berger DS. Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination on live birth rates after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2024; 121:452-459. [PMID: 38043842 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.11.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination on the live birth rates in patients who underwent in vitro fertilization. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Academic fertility practice. PATIENT(S) Patients who underwent fresh or frozen embryo transfer cycles at an academic center between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021. INTERVENTION(S) Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination, defined as completing a 2-dose regimen (Pfizer or Moderna) or 1-dose regimen (Johnson & Johnson/Janssen) before cycle initiation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) The primary outcome was the live birth rate per embryo transfer. The secondary outcomes included positive human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and clinical pregnancy rates per embryo transfer. The outcomes from cycles among vaccinated and unvaccinated patients were compared. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze demographic and cycle characteristics using the Student t test and Wilcoxon rank sum, Pearson chi-square, and Fisher exact tests as appropriate for univariate analysis. Generalized estimating equation models were used to examine the strength of the relationship between vaccination status and pregnancy outcomes. RESULT(S) Among 709 unvaccinated and 648 vaccinated fresh cycles, no statistically significant differences were observed between the number of oocytes retrieved, oocyte maturity, fertilization, and blastocyst utilization rates. In the adjusted multivariate analysis, no statistically significant differences were noted between fresh cycles among vaccinated patients compared with those among unvaccinated patients with the rates of positive hCG (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-2.25), clinical pregnancy (aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.73-2.03), or live birth (aOR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.79-2.25) per embryo transfer. Among 264 unvaccinated and 423 vaccinated frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles, vaccinated patients had higher odds of positive hCG (aOR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.08-2.20), clinical pregnancy (aOR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.27-2.56), and live birth (aOR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.60-3.32) per embryo transfer than unvaccinated patients. CONCLUSION(S) Patients who were COVID-19 vaccinated before FET had higher rates of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and live birth. Vaccination was not associated with the pregnancy or live birth rates after fresh cycles. This study contributes to evidence supporting COVID-19 vaccination for patients attempting pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Applebaum
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Leigh A Humphries
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Elizabeth Kravitz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Nathanael Koelper
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Clarisa Gracia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Dara S Berger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee EG, Perez A, Patel A, Patel AL, Waters T, Fricchione M, Johnson TJ. Impact of COVID-19 on Perinatal Outcomes and Birth Locations in a Large US Metropolitan Area. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:340. [PMID: 38338226 PMCID: PMC10855483 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12030340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
This was a population-based study to determine the impact of COVID-19 on birth outcomes in the Chicago metropolitan area, comparing pre-pandemic (April-September 2019) versus pandemic (April-September 2020) births. Multivariable regression models that adjusted for demographic and neighborhood characteristics were used to estimate the marginal effects of COVID-19 on intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD)/stillbirth, preterm birth, birth hospital designation, and maternal and infant hospital length of stay (LOS). There were no differences in IUFD/stillbirths or preterm births between eras. Commercially insured preterm and term infants were 4.8 percentage points (2.3, 7.4) and 3.4 percentage points (2.5, 4.2) more likely to be born in an academic medical center during the pandemic, while Medicaid-insured preterm and term infants were 3.6 percentage points less likely (-6.5, -0.7) and 1.8 percentage points less likely (-2.8, -0.9) to be born in an academic medical center compared to the pre-pandemic era. Infant LOS decreased from 2.4 to 2.2 days (-0.35, -0.20), maternal LOS for indicated PTBs decreased from 5.6 to 5.0 days (-0.94, -0.19), and term births decreased from 2.5 to 2.3 days (-0.21, -0.17). The pandemic had a significant effect on the location of births that may have exacerbated health inequities that continue into childhood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther G. Lee
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
| | - Alejandra Perez
- Department of Health Systems Management, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.P.); (A.P.); (T.J.J.)
| | - Arth Patel
- Department of Health Systems Management, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.P.); (A.P.); (T.J.J.)
- Department of Clinical Excellence, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Aloka L. Patel
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
| | - Thaddeus Waters
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA
| | - Marielle Fricchione
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
| | - Tricia J. Johnson
- Department of Health Systems Management, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.P.); (A.P.); (T.J.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Carlson J, Simeone RM, Ellington S, Galang R, DeSisto CL, Fleming-Dutra K, Riley L, Meaney-Delman D, Tong VT. Pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron Periods of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic and Health Outcomes During Delivery Hospitalization. Obstet Gynecol 2024; 143:131-138. [PMID: 37917932 PMCID: PMC10949122 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the relationship between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis at delivery and adverse maternal health and pregnancy outcomes during pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron variant predominance, with a focus on the time period of Omicron variant predominance. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional observational study with data from delivery hospitalizations in the Premier Healthcare Database from February 2020 to August 2023. The pre-Delta (February 2020-June 2021), Delta (July 2021-December 2021), and Omicron (January 2022-August 2023) periods of variant predominance were examined. Exposure to COVID-19 was identified by having a diagnostic code for COVID-19 during the delivery hospitalization. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) were calculated to compare the risks of adverse maternal and pregnancy outcomes for women with and without COVID-19 diagnoses at the time of delivery for each variant period. RESULTS Among 2,990,973 women with delivery hospitalizations, 1.9% (n=56,618) had COVID-19 diagnoses noted at delivery admission discharge, including 26,053 during the Omicron period. Across all variant time periods, the prevalence of many adverse maternal and pregnancy outcomes during the delivery hospitalization was significantly higher for pregnant women with COVID-19 compared with pregnant women without COVID-19. In adjusted models, COVID-19 during the Omicron period was associated with significant increased risks for maternal sepsis (COVID-19: 0.4% vs no COVID-19: 0.1%; aPR 3.32, 95% CI, 2.70-4.08), acute respiratory distress syndrome (0.6% vs 0.1%; aPR 6.19, 95% CI, 5.26-7.29), shock (0.2% vs 0.1%; aPR 2.14, 95% CI, 1.62-2.84), renal failure (0.5% vs 0.2%; aPR 2.08, 95% CI, 1.73-2.49), intensive care unit admission (2.7% vs 1.7%; aPR 1.64, 95% CI, 1.52-1.77), mechanical ventilation (0.3% vs 0.1%; aPR 3.15, 95% CI, 2.52-3.93), in-hospital death (0.03% vs 0.01%; aPR 5.00, 95% CI, 2.30-10.90), stillbirth (0.7% vs 0.6%; aPR 1.17, 95% CI, 1.01-1.36), and preterm delivery (12.3% vs 9.6%; aPR 1.28, 95% CI, 1.24-1.33). CONCLUSION Despite the possibility of some level of immunity due to previous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, vaccination, or testing differences, risks of adverse outcomes associated with COVID-19 diagnosis at delivery remained elevated during the Omicron variant time period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Carlson
- Eagle Global Scientific, LLC, and the Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, the Coronavirus and Other Respiratory Viruses Division, the Influenza Division, the Division of Reproductive Health, and the Division of Viral Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
DuBose B, Tembunde Y, Goodman KE, Pineles L, Nadimpalli G, Baghdadi JD, Parchem JG, Harris AD, Pineles BL. Delivery outcomes in a cohort of pregnant patients with COVID-19 with and without viral pneumonia. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2023; 5:101077. [PMID: 37399892 PMCID: PMC11018246 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among pregnant people, COVID-19 can lead to adverse outcomes, but the specific pregnancy outcomes that are affected by the disease are unclear. In addition, the effect of the severity of COVID-19 on pregnancy outcomes has not been clearly identified. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the associations between COVID-19 with and without viral pneumonia and cesarean delivery, preterm delivery, preeclampsia, and stillbirth. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a retrospective cohort study (April 2020-May 2021) of deliveries between 20 and 42 weeks of gestation from US hospitals in the Premier Healthcare Database. The primary outcomes were cesarean delivery, preterm delivery, preeclampsia, and stillbirth. We used a viral pneumonia diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases -Tenth-Clinical Modification codes J12.8 and J12.9) to categorize patients by severity of COVID-19. Pregnancies were categorized into 3 groups: NOCOVID (no COVID-19), COVID (COVID-19 without viral pneumonia), and PNA (COVID-19 with viral pneumonia). Groups were balanced for risk factors by propensity-score matching. RESULTS A total of 814,649 deliveries from 853 US hospitals were included (NOCOVID: n=799,132; COVID: n=14,744; PNA: n=773). After propensity-score matching, the risks of cesarean delivery and preeclampsia were similar in the COVID group compared with the NOCOVID group (matched risk ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.00; and matched risk ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-1.07; respectively). The risks of preterm delivery and stillbirth were greater in the COVID group than in the NOCOVID group (matched risk ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.19; and matched risk ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.66; respectively). The risks of cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, and preterm delivery were higher in the PNA group than in the COVID group (matched risk ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-2.03; matched risk ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.74; and matched risk ratio, 3.33; 95% confidence interval, 2.56-4.33; respectively). The risk of stillbirth was similar in the PNA and COVID group (matched risk ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-3.44). CONCLUSION Within a large national cohort of hospitalized pregnant people, we found that the risk of some adverse delivery outcomes was elevated in people with COVID-19 with and without viral pneumonia, with much higher risks in the group with viral pneumonia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brianna DuBose
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Mses DuBose and Tembunde)
| | - Yazmeen Tembunde
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Mses DuBose and Tembunde)
| | - Katherine E Goodman
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Goodman, Ms L Pineles, and Drs Nadimpalli, Baghdadi, and Harris)
| | - Lisa Pineles
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Goodman, Ms L Pineles, and Drs Nadimpalli, Baghdadi, and Harris)
| | - Gita Nadimpalli
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Goodman, Ms L Pineles, and Drs Nadimpalli, Baghdadi, and Harris)
| | - Jonathan D Baghdadi
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Goodman, Ms L Pineles, and Drs Nadimpalli, Baghdadi, and Harris)
| | - Jacqueline G Parchem
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, John P. and Kathrine G. McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX (Dr Parchem)
| | - Anthony D Harris
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Goodman, Ms L Pineles, and Drs Nadimpalli, Baghdadi, and Harris)
| | - Beth L Pineles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (Dr B Pineles).
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grobman WA, Sandoval GJ, Metz TD, Manuck TA, Clifton RG, Hughes BL, Saade GR, Longo M, Sowles A, Clark K, Simhan HN, Rouse DJ, Mendez-Figueroa H, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Bailit JL, Costantine MM, Sehdev HM, Tita ATN, Macones GA. The Temporal Relationship Between the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic and Preterm Birth. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 141:1171-1180. [PMID: 37141586 PMCID: PMC10440253 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether preterm birth rates changed in relation to the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and whether any change depended on socioeconomic status. METHODS This is an observational cohort study of pregnant individuals with a singleton gestation who delivered in the years 2019 and 2020 at 1 of 16 U.S. hospitals of the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The frequency of preterm birth for those who delivered before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (ie, in 2019) was compared with that of those who delivered after its onset (ie, in 2020). Interaction analyses were performed for people of different individual- and community-level socioeconomic characteristics (ie, race and ethnicity, insurance status, Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) of a person's residence). RESULTS During 2019 and 2020, 18,526 individuals met inclusion criteria. The chance of preterm birth before the COVID-19 pandemic was similar to that after the onset of the pandemic (11.7% vs 12.5%, adjusted relative risk 0.94, 95% CI 0.86-1.03). In interaction analyses, race and ethnicity, insurance status, and the SVI did not modify the association between the epoch and the chance of preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation (all interaction P >.05). CONCLUSION There was no statistically significant difference in preterm birth rates in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic onset. This lack of association was largely independent of socioeconomic indicators such as race and ethnicity, insurance status, or SVI of the residential community in which an individual lived.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William A Grobman
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, Columbia University, New York, New York, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC; and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gharacheh M, Kalan ME, Khalili N, Ranjbar F. An increase in cesarean section rate during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in Iran. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:936. [PMID: 37226119 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15907-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on healthcare services is likely to affect birth outcomes including the delivery mode. However, recent evidence has been conflicting in this regard. The study aimed to assess changes to C-section rate during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records of women delivered in the maternity department of hospitals in all provinces of Iran before the COVID-19 pandemic (February-August 30, 2019) and during the pandemic (February-August 30, 2020). Data were collected through the Iranian Maternal and Neonatal Network (IMAN), a country-wide electronic health record database management system for maternal and neonatal information. A total of 1,208,671 medical records were analyzed using the SPSS software version 22. The differences in C-section rates according to the studied variables were tested using the χ2 test. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the factors associated with C-section. RESULTS A significant rise was observed in the rates of C-section during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic (52.9% vs 50.8%; p = .001). The rates for preeclampsia (3.0% vs 1.3%), gestational diabetes (6.1% vs 3.0%), preterm birth (11.6% vs 6.9%), IUGR (1.2% vs 0.4%), LBW (11.2% vs 7.8%), and low Apgar score at first minute (4.2% vs 3.2%) were higher in women who delivered by C-section compared to those with normal delivery (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS The overall C-section rate during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic was significantly higher than the pre-pandemic period. C-section was associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Thus, preventing the overuse of C-section especially during pandemic becomes an urgent need for maternal and neonatal health in Iran.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Gharacheh
- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Rashid Yasemi St., Valiasr Ave., P.O. Box 19395-4798, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Ebrahimi Kalan
- School of Health Professions, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Narjes Khalili
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Preventive Medicine and Public Health Research Center, Psychosocial Health Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fahimeh Ranjbar
- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Rashid Yasemi St., Valiasr Ave., P.O. Box 19395-4798, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tanacan A, Oluklu D, Laleli Koc B, Sinaci S, Menekse Beser D, Uyan Hendem D, Yildirim M, Sakcak B, Besimoglu B, Tugrul Ersak D, Akgun Aktas B, Gulen Yildiz E, Unlu S, Kara O, Alyamac Dizdar E, Canpolat FE, Ates İ, Moraloglu Tekin O, Sahin D. The utility of systemic immune-inflammation index and systemic immune-response index in the prediction of adverse outcomes in pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019: Analysis of 2649 cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2023; 49:912-919. [PMID: 36582132 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
AIM To investigate the association of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and systemic immune-response index (SIRI) with adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS The cases were divided into (1) the Mild-moderate COVID-19 group (n = 2437) and (2) the Severe-critical COVID-19 group (n = 212). Clinical characteristics, perinatal outcomes, SII (neutrophilXplatelet/lymphocyte), and SIRI (neutrophilXmonocyte/lymphocyte) were compared between the groups. Afterward, SII and SIRI values were compared between subgroups based on pregnancy complications, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and maternal mortality. A receiver operator characteristic analysis was performed for the determination of optimal cutoff values for SII and SIRI in the prediction of COVID-19 severity, pregnancy complications, NICU admission, and maternal mortality. RESULTS Both SII and SIRI were significantly higher in complicated cases (p < 0.05). Cutoff values in the prediction of severe-critical COVID-19 were 1309.8 for SII, and 2.3 for SIRI. For pregnancy complications, optimal cutoff values were 973.2 and 1.6. Cutoff values of 1045.4 and 1.8 were calculated for the prediction of NICU admission. Finally, cut-off values of 1224.2 and 2.4 were found in the prediction of maternal mortality. CONCLUSION SII and SIRI might be used in combination with other clinical findings in the prediction of poor perinatal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atakan Tanacan
- Perinatology Clinic, Turkish Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Deniz Oluklu
- Perinatology Clinic, Turkish Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bergen Laleli Koc
- Perinatology Clinic, Turkish Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Selcan Sinaci
- Perinatology Clinic, Turkish Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Dilek Menekse Beser
- Perinatology Clinic, Turkish Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Derya Uyan Hendem
- Perinatology Clinic, Turkish Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Muradiye Yildirim
- Perinatology Clinic, Turkish Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bedri Sakcak
- Perinatology Clinic, Turkish Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Berhan Besimoglu
- Perinatology Clinic, Turkish Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Duygu Tugrul Ersak
- Perinatology Clinic, Turkish Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Betul Akgun Aktas
- Perinatology Clinic, Turkish Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Esra Gulen Yildiz
- Perinatology Clinic, Turkish Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Serpil Unlu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Turkish Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ozgur Kara
- Perinatology Clinic, Turkish Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Evrim Alyamac Dizdar
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Turkish Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fuat Emre Canpolat
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Turkish Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - İhsan Ates
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ozlem Moraloglu Tekin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Turkish Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Dilek Sahin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Turkish Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Beussink-Nelson L, Baldridge AS, Hibler E, Bello NA, Epps K, Cameron KA, Lloyd-Jones DM, Gooding HC, Catov JM, Rich-Edwards JW, Yee LM, Toledo P, Banayan JM, Khan SS. Knowledge and perception of cardiovascular disease risk in women of reproductive age. Am J Prev Cardiol 2022; 11:100364. [PMID: 35866048 PMCID: PMC9294042 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2022.100364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in American women, but general knowledge and perception of risk in this population remains poor. In this cross-sectional study of young women, significant gaps in knowledge and perception of CVD risk in individuals who have experienced an APO were identified along with general knowledge deficits related to pregnancy-related risk factors and CVD risk in young women. These findings provide primary data to support the need for development and delivery of educational content on CVD risk to young women, particularly during the peripartum period.
Objective Women who experience adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO) are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, their knowledge of CVD risk is not well characterized. We aimed to evaluate knowledge and perception of CVD risk in young women and to determine whether these factors differ based on experience of an APO. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study among women with a recent live birth at an urban medical center. Knowledge and perception of CVD risk were assessed through a self-administered online survey adapted from the American Heart Association Survey of Women's CVD Awareness. Results Of 5612 individuals contacted between 3/1/21 and 4/18/21, 714 completed the survey; the mean (SD) age was 34 (4) years and 25% reported an APO. While 62% of respondents identified CVD as the leading cause of death in women, there was no significant difference in CVD knowledge scores between participants who reported experiencing an APO and those who did not (6.9 vs 6.8 out of 10; p = 0.51). Participants who reported experiencing an APO had higher perception of personal risk for CVD (adjusted odds ratio, 2.64 [95% CI 1.83-3.80]) compared with participants who did not. Half of participants who experienced an APO reported perceiving average, or below average, risk for CVD and only 41 (22.5%) reported speaking with a healthcare professional about CVD within the past year. Conclusions Gaps remain in knowledge of CVD risk among young women, particularly after an APO. The peripartum period may represent a unique opportunity for targeted education when healthcare engagement is high.
Collapse
|