Point of care lung ultrasound service in neonatal intensive care: Five years of experience in Manitoba, Canada

Implementation of a standardized lung ultrasound protocol for respiratory distress in a neonatal intensive care unit: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of implementing a simple point-of-care lung ultrasound (LU) evaluation and reporting protocol in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and its effect on patient management.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study of LU examinations performed in a level III NICU. Each examination was performed according to a standardized protocol. An independent radiologist-assessed chest X-ray (CXR) was used to compare the LU diagnosis. The impact on patient management was also evaluated.

RESULT

A total of 206 LU studies in 158 neonates were reviewed. There was significant agreement between LU and CXR diagnoses (84.95%, 95% CI 80.07-89.83%). LU affected patient management in 87.8% of the cases (95% CI 83.33-92.28%).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a simplified, sign-based protocol for LU in the NICU is feasible. LU is not inferior to CXR studies and supports patient management as an imaging modality.

Current perception and barriers to implementing lung ultrasound in Canadian neonatal intensive care units: a national survey

Despite the growing body of literature supporting the use of point-of-care lung ultrasound (POC-LU) in neonates, its adoption in Canadian neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) remains limited. This study aimed to identify healthcare providers' perceptions and barriers to implementing POC-LU in Canadian NICUs. We conducted an electronic survey targeting neonatologists, neonatal fellows, neonatal nurse practitioners, and registered respiratory therapists in 20 Canadian NICUs. The survey comprised a 28-item questionnaire divided into four sections: (1) participants' demographics and availability of POC-LU equipment, (2) experience and interest in POC-LU learning, (3) perception of POC-LU as a diagnostic tool, and (4) barriers to POC-LU implementation in NICUs. A total of 194 participants completed the survey, with neonatologists comprising the majority (45%). Nearly half of the participants (48%) reported prior experience with POC-LU. The most prevalent indications for POC-LU use were diagnosis of pleural effusion (90%), pneumothorax (87%), and respiratory distress syndrome (76%). Participants identified the primary barrier to POC-LU adoption as the lack of trained providers available for both training and clinical integration. Notably, most respondents (87%) expressed keen interest in learning neonatal POC-LU. A subgroup analysis based on the responses collected from NICU-directors of 12 institutions yielded results consistent with those of the overall participant pool.     Conclusion: This survey underscores the perceived importance of POC-LU among NICU healthcare providers. A Canadian consensus is required to facilitate the development of widespread training programs as well as standardized clinical practice guideline for its implementation. What is Known: • In recent years, point-of-care lung ultrasound (POC-LU) has emerged as an important tool in neonatology, revolutionizing the assessment and management of critically ill infants. However, its adoption in Canadian Neonatal Intensive Care Units remains limited. What is New: • Most Canadian healthcare providers showed high level of interest in learning POC-LU techniques. Additionally, POC-LU was perceived as a useful tool for diagnosis and guiding intervention in various neonatal respiratory diseases. Nonetheless, the lack of expertise emerged as the primary barrier to its adoption and practice across different groups of participants regardless of their clinical experience level.

Lung ultrasound in the evaluation of pulmonary edema in newborns with critical congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Newborns with critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) with increased pulmonary blood flow (PBF) are at high risk for congestive heart failure. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the presence and degree of pulmonary edema in newborns with CCHD using lung ultrasound (LUS) during the perioperative period.

METHODS

Prospective clinical trial, 44 newborn patients with CCHD were evaluated in this prospective clinical trial. LUS was repeatedly performed to determine the course of pulmonary edema during the perioperative period. LUS was performed simultaneously with chest radiography (CXR), which was the main part of patient management. The primary outcome of this study was to identify whether a correlation existed between LUS and CXR findings. The secondary outcomes were to determine the relationship between LUS and the need for respiratory support, diuretic use, vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), and pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP) levels during the perioperative period.

RESULTS

The mean gestational age of the patients was 38.3 ± 1.7 weeks, with a mean birth weight of 3026 ± 432 g. In the preoperative period, both LUS and CXR images were consistent with clinical signs of pulmonary edema. On the first postoperative day, pulmonary edema increased compared to the preoperative period but gradually decreased by the 6th day of surgery (p < 0.05). Positive correlations were observed between the LUS and CXR findings at all study points (p < 0.05). The LUS findings exhibited trends parallel to those of VIS, serum pro-BNP levels, need for respiratory support, and diuretic requirements. As expected, these trends were more pronounced in CCHDs where PBF increased.

CONCLUSION

In CCHD, serial lung ultrasound (LUS) assessments, particularly in cases with increased PBF, can provide valuable guidance for managing patients during the perioperative period.