Spectrum of abnormalities and clonal transformation in germline RUNX1 familial platelet disorder and a genomic comparative analysis with somatic RUNX1 mutations in MDS/MPN overlap neoplasms

Updates on germline predisposition in pediatric hematologic malignancies: What is the role of flow cytometry?

Hematologic neoplasms with germline predisposition have been increasingly recognized as a distinct category of tumors over the last few years. As such, this category was added to the World Health Organization (WHO) 4th edition as well as maintained in the WHO 5th edition and International Consensus Classification (ICC) 2022 classification systems. In practice, these tumors require a high index of suspicion and confirmation by molecular testing. Flow cytometry is a cost-effective diagnostic tool that is routinely performed on peripheral blood and bone marrow samples. In this review, we sought to summarize the current body of research correlating flow cytometric immunophenotype to assess its utility in diagnosis of and clinical decision making in germline hematologic neoplasms. We also illustrate these findings using cases mostly from our own institution. We review some of the more commonly mutated genes, including CEBPA, DDX41, RUNX1, ANKRD26, GATA2, Fanconi anemia, Noonan syndrome, and Down syndrome. We highlight that flow cytometry may have a role in the diagnosis (GATA2, Down syndrome) and screening (CEBPA) of some germline predisposition syndromes, although appears to show nonspecific findings in others (DDX41, RUNX1). In many of the others, such as ANKRD26, Fanconi anemia, and Noonan syndrome, further studies are needed to better understand whether specific flow cytometric patterns are observed. Ultimately, we conclude that further studies such as large case series and organized data pipelines are needed in most germline settings to better understand the flow cytometric immunophenotype of these neoplasms.

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder with overlapping features of myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms, characterized by prominent monocytosis and an inherent risk for leukemic transformation (~15%-20% over 3-5 years).

DIAGNOSIS

Newly revised diagnostic criteria include sustained (>3 months) peripheral blood (PB) monocytosis (≥0.5 × 109/L; monocytes ≥10% of leukocyte count), consistent bone marrow (BM) morphology, <20% BM or PB blasts (including promonocytes), and cytogenetic or molecular evidence of clonality. Cytogenetic abnormalities occur in ~30% of patients, while >95% harbor somatic mutations: TET2 (~60%), SRSF2 (~50%), ASXL1 (~40%), RAS pathway (~30%), and others. The presence of ASXL1 and DNMT3A mutations and absence of TET2 mutations negatively impact overall survival (ASXL1WT/TET2MT genotype being favorable).

RISK STRATIFICATION

Several risk models serve similar purposes in identifying high-risk patients that are considered for allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) earlier than later. Risk factors in the Mayo Molecular Model (MMM) include presence of truncating ASXL1 mutations, absolute monocyte count >10 × 109/L, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, platelet count <100 × 109/L, and the presence of circulating immature myeloid cells; the resulting 4-tiered risk categorization includes high (≥3 risk factors), intermediate-2 (2 risk factors), intermediate-1 (1 risk factor), and low (no risk factors); the corresponding median survivals were 16, 31, 59, and 97 months. CMML is also classified as being "myeloproliferative (MP-CMML)" or "myelodysplastic (MD-CMML)," based on the presence or absence of leukocyte count of ≥13 × 109/L.

TREATMENT

ASCT is the only treatment modality that secures cure or long-term survival and is appropriate for MMM high/intermediate-2 risk disease. Drug therapy is currently not disease-modifying and includes hydroxyurea and hypomethylating agents; a recent phase-3 study (DACOTA) comparing hydroxyurea and decitabine, in high-risk MP-CMML, showed similar overall survival at 23.1 versus 18.4 months, respectively, despite response rates being higher for decitabine (56% vs. 31%).

UNIQUE DISEASE ASSOCIATIONS

These include systemic inflammatory autoimmune diseases, leukemia cutis and lysozyme-induced nephropathy; the latter requires close monitoring of renal function during leukocytosis and is a potential indication for cytoreductive therapy.

Unraveling germline predisposition in hematological neoplasms: Navigating complexity in the genomic era

Genomic advancements have yielded pivotal insights into hematological neoplasms, particularly concerning germline predisposition mutations. Following the WHO 2016 revisions, dedicated segments were proposed to address these aspects. Current WHO 2022, ICC 2022, and ELN 2022 classifications recognize their significance, introducing more mutations and prompting integration into clinical practice. Approximately 5-10% of hematological neoplasm patients show germline predisposition gene mutations, rising with risk factors such as personal cancer history and familial antecedents, even in older adults. Nevertheless, technical challenges persist. Optimal DNA samples are skin fibroblast-extracted, although not universally applicable. Alternatives such as hair follicle use are explored. Moreover, the scrutiny of germline genomics mandates judicious test selection to ensure precise and accurate interpretation. Given the significant influence of genetic counseling on patient care and post-assessment procedures, there arises a demand for dedicated centers offering specialized services.

A Brief History of Hemostasis and Thrombosis at the Mayo Clinic

Coagulation is a crucial biological mechanism in human bodies to prevent blood loss. Abnormal coagulation can cause bleeding diathesis or thrombosis, common pathologic conditions in our clinical practice. Many individuals and organizations have dedicated their efforts in the past decades to understanding the biological and pathological mechanisms of coagulation and developing laboratory testing tools and treatment options to help patients with bleeding or thrombotic conditions. Since 1926, the Mayo Clinic coagulation group has made significant contributions to the clinical and laboratory practice, basic and translational research on various hemostatic and thrombotic disorders, and the education and collaboration to share and advance our knowledge in coagulation through a highly integrated team and practice model. We would like to use this review to share our history and inspire medical professionals and trainees to join the efforts to advance our understanding of coagulation pathophysiology and improve our care for patients with coagulation disorders.

Somatic mutational landscape of hereditary hematopoietic malignancies caused by germline variants in RUNX1, GATA2, and DDX41

Individuals with germ line variants associated with hereditary hematopoietic malignancies (HHMs) have a highly variable risk for leukemogenesis. Gaps in our understanding of premalignant states in HHMs have hampered efforts to design effective clinical surveillance programs, provide personalized preemptive treatments, and inform appropriate counseling for patients. We used the largest known comparative international cohort of germline RUNX1, GATA2, or DDX41 variant carriers without and with hematopoietic malignancies (HMs) to identify patterns of genetic drivers that are unique to each HHM syndrome before and after leukemogenesis. These patterns included striking heterogeneity in rates of early-onset clonal hematopoiesis (CH), with a high prevalence of CH in RUNX1 and GATA2 variant carriers who did not have malignancies (carriers-without HM). We observed a paucity of CH in DDX41 carriers-without HM. In RUNX1 carriers-without HM with CH, we detected variants in TET2, PHF6, and, most frequently, BCOR. These genes were recurrently mutated in RUNX1-driven malignancies, suggesting CH is a direct precursor to malignancy in RUNX1-driven HHMs. Leukemogenesis in RUNX1 and DDX41 carriers was often driven by second hits in RUNX1 and DDX41, respectively. This study may inform the development of HHM-specific clinical trials and gene-specific approaches to clinical monitoring. For example, trials investigating the potential benefits of monitoring DDX41 carriers-without HM for low-frequency second hits in DDX41 may now be beneficial. Similarly, trials monitoring carriers-without HM with RUNX1 germ line variants for the acquisition of somatic variants in BCOR, PHF6, and TET2 and second hits in RUNX1 are warranted.

Germline and somatic drivers in inherited hematologic malignancies

Inherited hematologic malignancies are linked to a heterogenous group of genes, knowledge of which is rapidly expanding using panel-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) or whole-exome/whole-genome sequencing. Importantly, the penetrance for these syndromes is incomplete, and disease development, progression or transformation has critical clinical implications. With the earlier detection of healthy carriers and sequential monitoring of these patients, clonal hematopoiesis and somatic driver variants become significant factors in determining disease transformation/progression and timing of (preemptive) hematopoietic stem cell transplant in these patients. In this review, we shed light on the detection of probable germline predisposition alleles based on diagnostic/prognostic 'somatic' NGS panels. A multi-tier approach including variant allele frequency, bi-allelic inactivation, persistence of a variant upon clinical remission and mutational burden can indicate variants with high pre-test probability. We also discuss the shared underlying biology and frequency of germline and somatic variants affecting the same gene, specifically focusing on variants in DDX41, ETV6, GATA2 and RUNX1. Germline variants in these genes are associated with a (specific) pattern or over-/underrepresentation of somatic molecular or cytogenetic alterations that may help identify the underlying germline syndrome and predict the course of disease in these individuals. This review is based on the current knowledge about somatic drivers in these four syndromes by integrating data from all published patients, thereby providing clinicians with valuable and concise information.

Genomics of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm

Myelodysplastic/ Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) demonstrate overlapping pathologic and molecular features of myelodysplastic (MDS) and myeloproliferative (MPN) neoplasms. Diagnosis is difficult based on morphology alone, requiring exclusion of various non-neoplastic causes for CBC abnormalities and morphologic findings and other myeloid neoplasms. Identifying a clonal abnormality by cytogenetics or molecular studies has vastly improved our ability to diagnose MDS/MPN and has been incorporated in the different classification schemas. Currently two separate classification systems are in use- The 5^th edition WHO and international consensus classification. The two competing classifications emphasize genetic work-up and are similar on many levels; however, they do introduce diagnostic dilemma when diagnosing certain entities such as chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in the presence of NPM1 mutations. The genetic profile overlaps among different subentities; however, the combination and the incidence of mutations; together with the clinical features and morphology helps in further subclassification. In this review, we discuss the advances in molecular characterization of MDS/MPN. We attempt to summarize the differences between the various classification schemes, and highlight the changes made in the diagnostic criteria.

Molecular genetics and management of world health organization defined atypical chronic myeloid leukemia

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a rare BCR::ABL1-negative hematopoietic stem cell disease characterized by granulocytic proliferation and granulocytic dysplasia. Due to both the challenging diagnosis and the rarity of atypical CML, comprehensive molecular annotation-based analyses of this disease population have been scarce, and it is currently difficult to identify the optimal treatment for atypical CML. To explore atypical CML genomic landscape and treatment options, we performed a systematic retrospective of the clinical data and outcomes of 31 atypical CML patients. We observed that the molecular landscape of atypical CML was highly heterogeneous, with multiple molecular events driving its pathogenesis. Patients with atypical CML had a low response to current therapies, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 33.3% to hypomethylating agent (HMA)-based therapy. The current treatment strategies, including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), did not improve overall survival (OS) in atypical CML patients, with a median survival of 20 months. Thus, the benefits from HSCT and candidates for HSCT remain to be further evaluated. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-like chemotherapy followed by bridging allogeneic HSCT may be an ideal regimen for suitable individuals. The large-scale and prospective clinical studies will help to address the dilemma.

Familial platelet disorder due to germline exonic deletions in RUNX1: a diagnostic challenge with distinct alterations of the transcript isoform equilibrium

Germline pathogenic variants in RUNX1 are associated with familial platelet disorder with predisposition to myeloid malignancies (FPD/MM) with intragenic deletions in RUNX1 accounting for almost 7% of all reported variants. We present two new pedigrees with FPD/MM carrying two different germline RUNX1 intragenic deletions. The aforementioned deletions encompass exons 1-2 and 9-10 respectively, with the exon 9-10 deletion being previously unreported. RNA sequencing of patients carrying the exon 9-10 deletion revealed a fusion with LINC00160 resulting in a change in the 3' sequence of RUNX1. Expression analysis of the transcript isoform demonstrated altered RUNX1a/b/c ratios in carriers from both families compared to controls. Our data provide evidence on the impact of intragenic RUNX1 deletions on transcript isoform expression and highlight the importance of routinely performing copy number variant analysis in patients with suspected MM with germline predisposition.

Beyond Pathogenic RUNX1 Germline Variants: The Spectrum of Somatic Alterations in RUNX1-Familial Platelet Disorder with Predisposition to Hematologic Malignancies

Simple Summary

Pathogenic germline variants affecting RUNX1 are associated with qualitative and/or quantitative platelet defects, and predispose to hematologic malignancies. The latter manifests in approximately 44% of carriers and can occur from early childhood to late adulthood. In addition to the predisposing RUNX1 germline variant, the acquisition of somatic genetic alterations is presumed to drive leukemic transformation in an inflammatory bone marrow niche. The spectrum of somatic mutations occurs heterogeneously between individuals, even within families, and there is no clear genotype–phenotype correlation. In this review, we summarize previously published patients harboring (likely) pathogenic RUNX1 germline alterations in whom somatic alterations were additionally analyzed. We provide an overview of their phenotypes and the most frequent somatic genetic alterations.

Abstract

Pathogenic loss-of-function RUNX1 germline variants cause autosomal dominantly-inherited familial platelet disorder with predisposition to hematologic malignancies (RUNX1-FPD). RUNX1-FPD is characterized by incomplete penetrance and a broad spectrum of clinical phenotypes, even within affected families. Heterozygous RUNX1 germline variants set the basis for leukemogenesis, but, on their own, they are not transformation-sufficient. Somatically acquired secondary events targeting RUNX1 and/or other hematologic malignancy-associated genes finally lead to MDS, AML, and rarely other hematologic malignancies including lymphoid diseases. The acquisition of different somatic variants is a possible explanation for the variable penetrance and clinical heterogeneity seen in RUNX1-FPD. However, individual effects of secondary variants are not yet fully understood. Here, we review 91 cases of RUNX1-FPD patients who predominantly harbor somatic variants in genes such as RUNX1, TET2, ASXL1, BCOR, PHF6, SRSF2, NRAS, and DNMT3A. These cases illustrate the importance of secondary events in the development and progression of RUNX1-FPD-associated hematologic malignancies. The leukemia-driving interplay of predisposing germline variants and acquired variants remain to be elucidated to better understand clonal evolution and malignant transformation and finally allow risk-adapted surveillance and targeted therapeutic measures to prevent leukemia.

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: 2022 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder with overlapping features of myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms, with an inherent risk for leukemic transformation (~15% over 3-5 years).

DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis is based on the presence of sustained (>3 months) peripheral blood monocytosis (≥1 × 10⁹ /L; monocytes ≥10%), usually with accompanying bone marrow dysplasia. Clonal cytogenetic abnormalities occur in ~30% of patients, while >90% have somatic gene mutations. Mutations involving TET2 (~60%), SRSF2 (~50%), ASXL1 (~40%), and the oncogenic RAS pathway (~30%) are frequent, while the presence of ASXL1 and DNMT3A mutations and the absence of TET2 mutations negatively impact overall survival.

RISK-STRATIFICATION

Molecularly integrated prognostic models include the Groupe Français des Myélodysplasies, Mayo Molecular Model (MMM), and the CMML specific prognostic model. Risk factors incorporated into the MMM include presence of truncating ASXL1 mutations, absolute monocyte count >10 × 10⁹ /L, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, platelet count <100 × 10⁹ /L, and the presence of circulating immature myeloid cells. The MMM stratifies CMML patients into four groups: high (≥3 risk factors), intermediate-2 (2 risk factors), intermediate-1 (1 risk factor), and low (no risk factors), with median survivals of 16, 31, 59, and 97 months, respectively.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Hypomethylating agents such as 5-azacitidine and decitabine are commonly used, with overall response rates of ~40%-50% and complete remission rates of ~7%-17%; with no impact on mutational allele burdens. Allogeneic stem cell transplant is the only potentially curative option but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

Inherited Susceptibility to Hematopoietic Malignancies in the Era of Precision Oncology

As germline predisposition to hematopoietic malignancies has gained increased recognition and attention in the field of oncology, it is important for clinicians to use a systematic framework for the identification, management, and surveillance of patients with hereditary hematopoietic malignancies (HHMs). In this article, we discuss strategies for identifying individuals who warrant diagnostic evaluation and describe considerations pertaining to molecular testing. Although a paucity of prospective data is available to guide clinical monitoring of individuals harboring pathogenic variants, we provide recommendations for clinical surveillance based on consensus opinion and highlight current advances regarding the risk of progression to overt malignancy in HHM variant carriers. We also discuss the prognosis of HHMs and considerations surrounding the utility of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in these individuals. We close with an overview of contemporary issues at the intersection of HHMs and precision oncology.

Tumor necrosis factor‑related apoptosis‑inducing ligand is a novel transcriptional target of runt‑related transcription factor 1

Runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1), which is also known as acute myeloid leukemia 1 (AML1), has been frequently found with genomic aberrations in human leukemia. RUNX1 encodes a transcription factor that can regulate the expression of hematopoietic genes. In addition, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) performs an important function for malignant tumors in immune surveillance. However, the regulatory mechanism of TRAIL expression remain to be fully elucidated. In the present study, tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate-treated megakaryocytic differentiated K562 cells was used to examine the effect of RUNX1 on TRAIL expression. Luciferase assay series of TRAIL promoters for the cells co-transfected with RUNX1 and core-binding factor β (CBFβ) expression vectors were performed to evaluate the nature of TRAIL transcriptional regulation. Electrophoresis mobility shift assay of the RUNX1 consensus sequence of the TRAIL promoter with recombinant RUNX1 and CBFβ proteins was also performed. BloodSpot database analysis for TRAIL expression in patients with acute myeloid leukemia were performed. The expression of TRAIL, its receptor Death receptor 4 and 5 and RUNX1 in K562 cells transfected with the RUNX1 expression vector and RUNX1 siRNA were evaluated by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). TRAIL and RUNX1-ETO expression was also measured in Kasumi-1 cells transfected with RUNX1-ETO siRNA and in KG-1 cells transfected with RUNX1-ETO expression plasmid, both by RT-qPCR. Cell counting, lactate dehydrogenase assay and cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry were performed on Kasumi-1, KG-1, SKNO-1 and K562 cells treated with TRAIL and HDAC inhibitors sodium butyrate or valproic acid. The present study demonstrated that RUNX1 is a transcriptional regulator of TRAIL. It was initially found that the induction of TRAIL expression following the megakaryocytic differentiation of human leukemia cells was RUNX1-dependent. Subsequently, overexpression of RUNX1 was found to increase TRAIL mRNA expression by activating its promoter activity. Additional analyses revealed that RUNX1 regulated the expression of TRAIL in an indirect manner, because RUNX1 retained its ability to activate this promoter following the mutation of all possible RUNX1 consensus sites. Furthermore, TRAIL expression was reduced in leukemia cells carrying the t(8;21) translocation, where the RUNX1-ETO chimeric protein interfere with normal RUNX1 function. Exogenous treatment of recombinant TRAIL proteins was found to induce leukemia cell death. To conclude, the present study provided a novel mechanism, whereby TRAIL is a target gene of RUNX1 and TRAIL expression was inhibited by RUNX1-ETO. These results suggest that TRAIL is a promising agent for the clinical treatment of t(8;21) AML.

Spectrum of hematological malignancies, clonal evolution and outcomes in 144 Mayo Clinic patients with germline predisposition syndromes

Germline predisposition syndromes (GPS) result from constitutional aberrations in tumor suppressive and homeostatic genes, increasing risk for neoplasia in affected kindred. In this study, we present clinical and genomic data on 144 Mayo Clinic patients with GPS; 59 evaluated prospectively using an algorithm-based diagnostic approach in the setting of a dedicated GPS/ inherited bone marrow failure syndrome (IBMFS) clinic. Seventy-two (50%) patients had IBMFS (telomere biology disorders-32,Fanconi anemia-18, Diamond Blackfan Anemia - 11, congenital neutropenia-5, Schwachman-Diamond Syndrome-5 and Bloom Syndrome-1), 27 (19%) had GPS with antecedent thrombocytopenia (RUNX1-FPD-15, ANKRD26-6, ETV6-2, GATA1-1, MPL-3), 28 (19%) had GPS without antecedent thrombocytopenia (GATA2 haploinsufficiency-16, DDX41-10, CBL-1 and CEBPA-1) and 17 (12%) had general cancer predisposition syndromes (ataxia telangiectasia-7, heterozygous ATM variants-3, CHEK2-2, TP53-2, CDK2NA-1, NF1-1 and Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome-1). Homozygous and heterozygous ATM pathogenic variants were exclusively associated with lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD), while DDX41 GPS was associated with LPD and myeloid neoplasms. The use of somatic NGS-testing identified clonal evolution in GPS patients, with ASXL1, RAS pathway genes, SRSF2 and TET2 being most frequently mutated. Fifty-two (91%) of 59 prospectively identified GPS patients had a change in their management approach, including additional GPS-related screening in 42 (71%), referral for allogenic HSCT workup and screening of related donors in 16 (27%), medication initiation and selection of specific conditioning regimens in 14 (24%), and genetic counseling with specific intent of fertility preservation and preconceptual counseling in 10 (17%) patients; highlighting the importance of dedicated GPS screening, detection and management programs for patients with hematological neoplasms.

Germline predisposition to haematopoietic malignancies

Once thought to be exceedingly rare, the advent of next-generation sequencing has revealed a plethora of germline predisposition disorders that confer risk for haematopoietic malignancies (HMs). These syndromes are now recognized to be much more common than previously thought. The recognition of a germline susceptibility risk allele in an individual impacts the clinical management and health surveillance strategies in the index patient and relatives who share the causative DNA variant. Challenges to accurate clinical testing include a lack of familiarity in many health care providers, the requirement for DNA samples that reasonably approximate the germline state, and a lack of standardization among diagnostic platforms as to which genes are sequenced and their capabilities in detecting the full range of variant types that confer risk. Current knowledge gaps include a comprehensive understanding of all predisposition genes; whether scenarios exist in which an allogeneic stem cell transplant using donor haematopoietic stem cells with deleterious variants is permissive; and effective means of delivering genetic counseling and results disclosure for these conditions. We are hopeful that comprehensive germline genetic testing, universal germline testing for all patients with an HM, universal germline testing for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell donors, and the development of preventive strategies to delay or even prevent malignancies will be available in the near future. These factors will likely contribute to improved health outcomes for at-risk individuals and their family members.

The Emerging Role of Hematopathologists and Molecular Pathologists in Detection, Monitoring, and Management of Myeloid Neoplasms with Germline Predisposition

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Awareness, widespread availability, and routine use of sequencing techniques in work-up of myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia have facilitated increased recognition of these entities arising in a background of germline predisposition disorders (GPD).

RECENT FINDINGS

The latest revisions to the WHO classification of myeloid neoplasms incorporate "myeloid neoplasms with germline predisposition" as a separate entity due to the therapeutic implications of this diagnosis. It has become apparent that some of these entities have unique recognizable morphologic findings that can be challenging to interpret at time. Hence, much needs to be studied, posing a new layer of complexity to hematopathologists and oncologists. A thorough understanding of cytogenetic and molecular findings during disease evolution is essential. Consequently, hematopathologists and molecular pathologists play an increasing role in recognition of bone marrow morphologic features that help in recognition of underlying GPD, monitoring, and prompt identification of progression.

Genetic complexity of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

In recent years CMML has received increased attention as the most commonly observed MDS/MPN overlap syndrome. Renewed interest has occurred in part due to widespread adoption of next-generation sequencing panels that help render the diagnosis in the absence of morphologic dysplasia. Although most CMML patients exhibit somatic mutations in epigenetic modifiers, spliceosome components, transcription factors and signal transduction genes, it is increasingly clear that a small subset harbors an inherited predisposition to CMML and other myeloid neoplasms. More intriguing is the fact that the mutational spectrum observed in CMML is found in other types of myeloid leukemias, begging the question of how similar genetic backgrounds can lead to such divergent clinical phenotypes. In this review we present a contemporary snapshot of the genetic complexity inherent to CMML, explore the relationship between genotype-phenotype and present a stepwise model of CMML pathogenesis and progression.

Genomics of myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm overlap syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) overlap syndromes are uniquely classified neoplasms occurring in both children and adults. This category consists of 5 neoplastic subtypes: chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML), BCR-ABL1-negative atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML), MDS/MPN-ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T), and MDS/MPN-unclassifiable (U). Cytogenetic abnormalities and somatic copy number variations are uncommon; however, >90% patients harbor gene mutations. Although no single gene mutation is specific to a disease subtype, certain mutational signatures in the context of appropriate clinical and morphological features can be used to establish a diagnosis. In CMML, mutated coexpression of TET2 and SRSF2 results in clonal hematopoiesis skewed toward monocytosis, and the ensuing acquisition of driver mutations including ASXL1, NRAS, and CBL results in overt disease. MDS/MPN-RS-T demonstrates features of SF3B1-mutant MDS with ring sideroblasts (MDS-RS), with the development of thrombocytosis secondary to the acquisition of signaling mutations, most commonly JAK2V617F. JMML, the only pediatric entity, is a bona fide RASopathy, with germline and somatic mutations occurring in the oncogenic RAS pathway giving rise to disease. BCR-ABL1-negative aCML is characterized by dysplastic neutrophilia and is enriched in SETBP1 and ETNK1 mutations, whereas MDS/MPN-U is the least defined and lacks a characteristic mutational signature. Molecular profiling also provides prognostic information, with truncating ASXL1 mutations being universally detrimental and germline CBL mutations in JMML showing spontaneous regression. Sequencing information in certain cases can help identify potential targeted therapies (IDH1, IDH2, and splicing mutations) and should be a mainstay in the diagnosis and management of these neoplasms.

Germline mutations: many roles in leukemogenesis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to summarize the current understanding of germline mutations as they contribute to leukemia development and progression. We also discuss how these new insights may help improve clinical management of germline mutations associated with leukemia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Germline mutations may represent important initial mutations in the development of leukemia where interaction with somatic mutations provide further hits in leukemic progression. In addition, germline mutations may also contribute to leukemogenesis by impacting bone marrow stem-cell microenvironment and immune cell development and function.

SUMMARY

Leukemia is characterized by the clonal expansion of malignant cells secondary to somatic or germline mutations in a variety of genes. Understanding somatic mutations that drive leukemogenesis has drastically improved our knowledge of leukemia biology and led to novel therapeutic strategies. Advances have also been made in identifying germline mutations that may affect leukemic development and progression. This review will discuss the biological and clinical relationship of germline mutations with clonal hematopoiesis, bone marrow microenvironment, and immunity in the progression of leukemia.