Mismatch repair phenotype determines the implications of tumor grade and CDX2 expression in stage II-III colon cancer

Evaluation of the Immunohistochemical Scoring System of CDX2 Expression as a Prognostic Biomarker in Colon Cancer

Encoded by the CDX2 homeobox gene, the CDX2 protein assumes the role of a pivotal transcription factor localized within the nucleus of intestinal epithelial cells, orchestrating the delicate equilibrium of intestinal physiology while intricately guiding the precise development and differentiation of epithelial tissue. Emerging research has unveiled that positive immunohistochemical expression of this protein shows that the CDX2 gene exerts a potent suppressive impact on tumor advancement in colorectal cancer, impeding the proliferation and distant dissemination of tumor cells, while the inhibition or suppression of CDX2 frequently correlates with aggressive behavior in colorectal cancer. In this study, we conducted an immunohistochemical assessment of CDX2 expression on a cohort of 43 intraoperatively obtained tumor specimens from patients diagnosed with colon cancer at Colțea Clinical Hospital in Bucharest, between April 2019 and December 2023. Additionally, we shed light on the morphological diversity within colon tumors, uncovering varying differentiation grades within the same tumor, reflecting the variations in CDX2 expression as well as the genetic complexity underlying these tumors. Based on the findings, we developed an innovative immunohistochemical scoring system that addresses the heterogeneous nature of colon tumors. Comprehensive statistical analysis of CDX2 immunohistochemical expression unveiled significant correlations with known histopathological parameters such as tumor differentiation grades (p-value = 0.011) and tumor budding score (p-value = 0.002), providing intriguing insights into the complex involvement of the CDX2 gene in orchestrating tumor progression through modulation of differentiation processes, and highlighting its role in metastatic predisposition. The compelling correlation identified between CDX2 expression and conventional histopathological parameters emphasizes the prognostic significance of the CDX2 biomarker in colon cancer. Moreover, our novel immunohistochemical scoring system reveals a distinct subset of colon tumors exhibiting reserved prognostic outcomes, distinguished by their "mosaic" CDX2 expression pattern.

The Prognostic Role of Mismatch Repair Status and CDX-2 Expression with Inflammatory Markers and Pathological Risk Factors in Stage II and III Colon Cancer: Multicenter Real-Life Data

OBJECTIVE

Colorectal cancer is common worldwide, and adjuvant treatment's benefit is still controversial. We designed this study to determine the role of MSI and CDX-2 status determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) combined with the inflammatory markers and pathological parameters in predicting disease recurrence in stage II and III colon cancer.

METHODS

A total of 226 stage II/III colon cancer patients with a median age of 59 years who underwent initial surgery were included in this retrospective study. The pathologic assessment of MSI and CDX-2 was performed twice by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and two different pathologists. No staining/weak staining below 10% of the tumor was accepted as CDX-2 negative, and any MSI clones with weak staining below 10% were accepted as MSI-H. The laboratory parameters were noted at the initial diagnosis.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one and 105 patients were diagnosed with stage III and II colon cancer. 58.0% of patients were male, 46 (20.4%) of tumor tissue were MSS, and 17 (7.5%) were CDX-2 negative. One hundred twenty-nine tumors were localized in the right colon. Disease recurrence was significantly correlated with tumor localization, CDX-2 status, stage at diagnosis, and preoperatively median CRP and CEA levels. DFS rates for MSS patients with CDX-2 negative and positive were 36.7% and 98.1%, respectively [p < 0.001]. There was no significant correlation between MSI status and CDX-2 status. MSI status, the presence of adjuvant treatment, and systemic inflammatory markers were not significant prognostic factors for DFS. CDX-2 status [HR:0.08, CI 95% 0.03-0.17, p < 0.001 HR: 1.7, CI 95% 1.1-3.0, p = 0.03], disease stage [HR:2.6, CI 95% 1.43-4.74], and preoperatively CEA levels [HR:4.1 CI 95% 2.18-785, p < 0.001 were independent significant prognostic factors for DFS.

CONCLUSION

CDX-2 loss was an independent prognostic factor for DFS and disease recurrence in early-stage colon cancer. MSS patients with CDX-2 loss had significantly worse survival outcomes, and this might be the reason for deciding on adjuvant chemotherapy.

Machine-Learning Identifies a Strategy for Differentiation Therapy in Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND

Although differentiation therapy can cure some hematologic malignancies, its curative potential remains unrealized in solid tumors. This is because conventional computational approaches succumb to the thunderous noise of inter-/intratumoral heterogeneity. Using colorectal cancers (CRCs) as an example, here we outline a machine learning(ML)-based approach to track, differentiate, and selectively target cancer stem cells (CSCs).

METHODS

A transcriptomic network was built and validated using healthy colon and CRC tissues in diverse gene expression datasets (~5,000 human and >300 mouse samples). Therapeutic targets and perturbation strategies were prioritized using ML, with the goal of reinstating the expression of a transcriptional identifier of the differentiated colonocyte, CDX2, whose loss in poorly differentiated (CSC-enriched) CRCs doubles the risk of relapse/death. The top candidate target was then engaged with a clinical-grade drug and tested on 3 models: CRC lines in vitro, xenografts in mice, and in a prospective cohort of healthy (n = 3) and CRC (n = 23) patient-derived organoids (PDOs).

RESULTS

The drug shifts the network predictably, induces CDX2 and crypt differentiation, and shows cytotoxicity in all 3 models, with a high degree of selectivity towards all CDX2-negative cell lines, xenotransplants, and PDOs. The potential for effective pairing of therapeutic efficacy (IC50) and biomarker (CDX2-low state) is confirmed in PDOs using multivariate analyses. A 50-gene signature of therapeutic response is derived and tested on 9 independent cohorts (~1700 CRCs), revealing the impact of CDX2-reinstatement therapy could translate into a ~50% reduction in the risk of mortality/recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings not only validate the precision of the ML approach in targeting CSCs, and objectively assess its impact on clinical outcome, but also exemplify the use of ML in yielding clinical directive information for enhancing personalized medicine.

Potential predictors for CDX2 expression loss and mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal cancer

CDX2 expression loss is commonly associated with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, there are only a few studies that have attempted to correlate CDX2 expression loss with specific MMR genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2). This is a retrospective study of 327 patients who underwent surgery due to CRC. Nine patients (2.9%) had two synchronous CRCs, making the total sample 336 CRC. Histopathological data such as tumor type, tumor grade, perineural, lymphatic, and vascular invasion, pT stage, pN stage, peritumoral and intratumoral lymphocytic infiltration were collected and recorded in the database. After immunohistochemical analysis, CDX2 expression, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 deficiency were also recorded. CDX2 expression loss was detected in 19 out of 336 CRCs (5.9%) and was associated with ascending colon CRC, partially mucinous adenocarcinoma, poorly differentiated carcinoma, and dMMR. Forty-four (13.1%) of CRCs were dMMR. We found a statistically significant association between CDX2 expression loss and MLH1 and PMS2 deficiency. Considering that most expression phenotypes include pairs of MMR genes, we analyzed MLH1/PMS2 and MSH2/MSH6 as heterodimers. Analysis of heterodimers showed a similar result, namely, that MLH1/PMS2 heterodimer deficiency was significantly associated with CDX2 expression loss. We also constructed a regression model for CDX2 expression loss and for dMMR. Poor tumor differentiation and MLH1/PMS2 heterodimer deficiency have been identified as potential predictors for CDX2 expression loss. CRC in the ascending colon and CDX2 expression loss have been identified as positive potential predictors of dMMR with rectal cancer as negative potential predictor of dMMR. Our study showed a significant association between CDX2 expression loss and MLH1 and PMS2 deficiency in CRC. We also managed to produce a regression model for CDX2 expression and showed that poor tumor differentiation and MLH1/PMS2 heterodimer deficiency are independent factors for CDX2 expression loss. We were the first to include CDX2 expression in a regression model for dMMR and showed that CDX2 expression loss can be used as a predictive factor for dMMR, which should be confirmed by further studies.

Prognostic Significance of MRE11 Overexpression in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Meiotic recombination 11 (MRE11) plays a critical role in the DNA damage response and maintenance of genome stability and is associated with the prognosis for numerous malignancies. Here, we explored the clinicopathological significance and prognostic value of MRE11 expression in colorectal cancer (CRC), a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Samples from 408 patients who underwent surgery for colon and rectal cancer between 2006 and 2011, including a sub-cohort of 127 (31%) patients treated with adjuvant therapy, were analyzed. In Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, we found that high MRE11 expression in the tumor center (TC) was significantly associated with poor disease-free survival (DFS; p = 0.045) and overall survival (OS; p = 0.039). Intriguingly, high MRE11 expression in the TC was also significantly correlated with reduced DFS (p = 0.005) and OS (p = 0.010) in the subgroup with right-sided primary CRC. In multivariate analyses, high MRE11 expression (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.697, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.034-2.785; p = 0.036) and lymphovascular/perineural invasion (LVI/PNI; HR = 1.922, 95% CI 1.122-3.293; p = 0.017) showed significant association with worse OS in patients with right-sided tumors but not those with left-sided tumors. Moreover, in patients with right-sided tumors, high MRE11 was associated with worse OS for those with lymph node involvement (p = 0.006) and LVI/PNI (p = 0.049). Collectively, our results suggest that MRE11 may serve as an independent prognostic marker in those with right-sided severe CRC, with clinical value in the management of these patients.

Effects of deficient mismatch repair on the prognosis of patients with stage II and stage III colon cancer during different postoperative periods

Background

We evaluated the prognostic role of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) systems in stage II and stage III colon cancer patients during different postoperative periods. We also assessed whether patients aged ≥75 could benefit from chemotherapy.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted across three medical centers in China. Kaplan–Meier survival methods and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the differences in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce imbalances in the baseline characteristics of the patients. Landmark analysis was performed to evaluate the role of dMMR during different postoperative periods.

Results

The median follow-up time for all patients was 45.0 months (25–75 IQR: 38.0–82.5). There was no significant OS (p = 0.350) or DFS (p = 0.752) benefit associated with dMMR for stage II and III patients during the first postoperative year. However, significant OS (p < 0.001) and DFS (p < 0.001) benefits were observed from the second postoperative year until the end of follow-up. These differences remained after propensity score matching. Moreover, chemotherapy produced no OS (HR = 0.761, 95% CI: 0.43–1.34, p = 0.341) or DFS (HR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.51–1.88, p = 0.961) benefit for patients aged ≥75 years.

Conclusion

The benefits of dMMR in stage III patients were observed from the second postoperative year until the end of follow-up. However, the prognosis of patients with dMMR is not different from that of patients with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) during the first postoperative year. In addition, elderly patients aged ≥75 years obtained no significant survival benefits from postoperative chemotherapy.

Stage-dependent prognostic shift in mismatch repair-deficient tumors: Assessing patient outcomes in stage II and III colon cancer

Introduction

Deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) is associated with an improved prognosis in colon cancer stage II but poor prognosis in stage IV colon cancer. The clinical significance of dMMR in colon cancer stage III is not established.

Methods

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) from 544 patients with colon cancer stage II and III with clinicopathological and survival data were stained for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, CD3, CD8, and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and programmed death ligand- 1 (PD-L1). Patient outcomes were reviewed.

Results

In stage III colon cancer, dMMR was a marker of poor disease-free survival (DFS) (Kaplan–Meier, mean survival in months: dMMR: 28.76 (95% CI 18.46–39.05) vs. pMMR 40.91 (37.20–44.63), p=0.014, multivariate Cox regression: hazard ratio (HR) 4.17 (95% CI 2.02–8.61), p<0.001). In stage II colon cancer, there was a tendency toward improved DFS for dMMR patients (dMMR: 57.14 (95% CI 54.66–59.62) vs. pMMR 53.54 (95% CI 51.48–55.60), p=0.015, multivariate Cox regression HR 0.24 (95% CI 0.06-1.04), p=0.057). CD3, CD8, and PD-L1 expression was not associated with prognosis of dMMR patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a significant interaction between the MMR phenotype and stage (p=0.001).

Conclusion

dMMR is associated with an improved prognosis in stage II colon cancer but is no longer associated with a favorable prognosis in stage III colon cancer.

Prognostic Impact of TP53 Mutations and Tumor Mutational Load in Colorectal Cancer

The DNA damage response (DDR) is critical for maintaining genome stability, and abnormal DDR—resulting from mutations in DNA damage-sensing and repair proteins—is a hallmark of cancer. Here, we aimed to investigate the predictive power of DDR gene mutations and the tumor mutational load (TML) for survival outcomes in a cohort of 22 rectal cancer patients who received pre-operative neoadjuvant therapy. Univariate analysis revealed that TML-high and TP53 mutations were significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS) with TML-high retaining significance in multivariate analyses. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses further showed TML-high was associated with worse disease-free (p = 0.036) and OS (p = 0.024) results in our patient cohort. A total of 53 somatic mutations were identified in 22 samples with eight (36%) containing mutations in DDR genes, including ATM, ATR, CHEK2, MRE11A, RAD50, NBN, ERCC2 and TP53. TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene, and TP53 mutations were significantly associated with worse OS (p = 0.023) in Kaplan–Meier survival analyses. Thus, our data indicate that TML and TP53 mutations have prognostic value for rectal cancer patients and may be important independent biomarkers for patient management. This suggests that prognostic determination for rectal cancer patients receiving pre-operative neoadjuvant therapy should include consideration of the initial TML and tumor genetic status.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Roles of CDX2 Immunohistochemical Expression in Colorectal Cancers

The study is aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic role of the immunohistochemical expression of the Caudal-type homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2) in colorectal cancers (CRCs) through a meta-analysis. By searching relevant databases, 38 articles were eligible to be included in this study. We extracted the information for CDX2 expression rates and the correlation between CDX2 expression and clinicopathological characteristics. The estimated rates of CDX2 expression were 0.882 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.774−0.861] and 0.893 (95% CI 0.820−0.938) in primary and metastatic CRCs, respectively. Furthermore, based on their histologic subtype, CDX2 expression rates of adenocarcinoma and medullary carcinoma were 0.886 (95% CI 0.837−0.923) and 0.436 (95% CI 0.269−0.618), respectively. There was a significant difference in CDX2 expression rates between adenocarcinoma and medullary carcinoma in the meta-regression test (p < 0.001). In addition, CDX2 expression was significantly lower in CRCs with the BRAFV600E mutation than in CRCs without mutation. Patients with CDX2 expression had better overall and cancer-specific survival rates than those without CDX2 expression. Thus, CDX2 is a useful diagnostic and prognostic marker CRCs.

Loss of CDX2 in colorectal cancer is associated with histopathologic subtypes and microsatellite instability but is prognostically inferior to hematoxylin-eosin-based morphologic parameters from the WHO classification

BACKGROUND

Immunohistochemical loss of CDX2 has been proposed as a biomarker of dismal survival in colorectal carcinoma (CRC), especially in UICC Stage II/III. However, it remains unclear, how CDX2 expression is related to central hematoxylin-eosin (HE)-based morphologic parameters defined by 2019 WHO classification and how its prognostic relevance is compared to these parameters.

METHODS

We evaluated CDX2 expression in 1003 CRCs and explored its prognostic relevance compared to CRC subtypes, tumour budding and WHO grade in the overall cohort and in specific subgroups.

RESULTS

CDX2-low/absent CRCs were enriched in specific morphologic subtypes, right-sided and microsatellite-instable (MSI-H) CRCs (P < 0.001) and showed worse survival characteristics in the overall cohort/UICC Stage II/III (e.g. DFS: P = 0.005) and in microsatellite stable and left-sided CRCs, but not in MSI-H or right-sided CRCs. Compared with CDX2, all HE-based markers showed a significantly better prognostic discrimination in all scenarios. In multivariate analyses including all morphologic parameters, CDX2 was not an independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSION

CDX2 loss has some prognostic impact in univariate analyses, but its prognostic relevance is considerably lower compared to central HE-based morphologic parameters defined by the WHO classification and vanishes in multivariate analyses incorporating these factors.