1
|
Zhang MX, Lilien TA, van Etten-Jamaludin FS, Fraenkel CJ, Bonn D, Vlaar APJ, Löndahl J, Klompas M, Bem RA. Generation of Aerosols by Noninvasive Respiratory Support Modalities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2337258. [PMID: 37819660 PMCID: PMC10568354 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Infection control guidelines have historically classified high-flow nasal oxygen and noninvasive ventilation as aerosol-generating procedures that require specialized infection prevention and control measures. Objective To evaluate the current evidence that high-flow nasal oxygen and noninvasive ventilation are associated with pathogen-laden aerosols and aerosol generation. Data Sources A systematic search of EMBASE and PubMed/MEDLINE up to March 15, 2023, and CINAHL and ClinicalTrials.gov up to August 1, 2023, was performed. Study Selection Observational and (quasi-)experimental studies of patients or healthy volunteers supported with high-flow nasal oxygen or noninvasive ventilation were selected. Data Extraction and Synthesis Three reviewers were involved in independent study screening, assessment of risk of bias, and data extraction. Data from observational studies were pooled using a random-effects model at both sample and patient levels. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the influence of model choice. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were the detection of pathogens in air samples and the quantity of aerosol particles. Results Twenty-four studies were included, of which 12 involved measurements in patients and 15 in healthy volunteers. Five observational studies on SARS-CoV-2 detection in a total of 212 air samples during high-flow nasal oxygen in 152 patients with COVID-19 were pooled for meta-analysis. There was no association between high-flow nasal oxygen and pathogen-laden aerosols (odds ratios for positive samples, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.15-3.55] at the sample level and 0.80 [95% CI, 0.14-4.59] at the patient level). Two studies assessed SARS-CoV-2 detection during noninvasive ventilation (84 air samples from 72 patients). There was no association between noninvasive ventilation and pathogen-laden aerosols (odds ratios for positive samples, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.03-4.63] at the sample level and 0.43 [95% CI, 0.01-27.12] at the patient level). None of the studies in healthy volunteers reported clinically relevant increases in aerosol particle production by high-flow nasal oxygen or noninvasive ventilation. Conclusions and Relevance This systematic review and meta-analysis found no association between high-flow nasal oxygen or noninvasive ventilation and increased airborne pathogen detection or aerosol generation. These findings argue against classifying high-flow nasal oxygen or noninvasive ventilation as aerosol-generating procedures or differentiating infection prevention and control practices for patients receiving these modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeline X. Zhang
- Institute of Physics, Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thijs A. Lilien
- Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Carl-Johan Fraenkel
- Division of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Daniel Bonn
- Institute of Physics, Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander P. J. Vlaar
- Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jakob Löndahl
- Division of Ergonomics and Aerosol Technology, Department of Design Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Michael Klompas
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Reinout A. Bem
- Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martin-Gill C, Brown KM, Cash RE, Haupt RM, Potts BT, Richards CT, Patterson PD. 2022 Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Guidelines for Prehospital Care. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2023; 27:131-143. [PMID: 36369826 DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2143603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multiple national organizations and federal agencies have promoted the development, implementation, and evaluation of evidence-based guidelines (EBGs) for prehospital care. Previous efforts have identified opportunities to improve the quality of prehospital guidelines and highlighted the value of high-quality EBGs to inform initial certification and continued competency activities for EMS personnel. OBJECTIVES We aimed to perform a systematic review of prehospital guidelines published from January 2018 to April 2021, evaluate guideline quality, and identify top-scoring guidelines to facilitate dissemination and educational activities for EMS personnel. METHODS We searched the literature in Ovid Medline and EMBASE from January 2018 to April 2021, excluding guidelines identified in a prior systematic review. Publications were retained if they were relevant to prehospital care, based on organized reviews of the literature, and focused on providing recommendations for clinical care or operations. Included guidelines were appraised to identify if they met the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) criteria for high-quality guidelines and scored across the six domains of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool. RESULTS We identified 75 guidelines addressing a variety of clinical and operational aspects of EMS medicine. About half (n = 39, 52%) addressed time/life-critical conditions and 33 (44%) contained recommendations relevant to non-clinical/operational topics. Fewer than half (n = 35, 47%) were based on systematic reviews of the literature. Nearly one-third (n = 24, 32%) met all NAM criteria for clinical practice guidelines. Only 27 (38%) guidelines scored an average of >75% across AGREE II domains, with content relevant to guideline implementation most commonly missing. CONCLUSIONS This interval systematic review of prehospital EBGs identified many new guidelines relevant to prehospital care; more than all guidelines reported in a prior systematic review. Our review reveals important gaps in the quality of guideline development and the content in their publications, evidenced by the low proportion of guidelines meeting NAM criteria and the scores across AGREE II domains. Efforts to increase guideline dissemination, implementation, and related education may be best focused around the highest quality guidelines identified in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Martin-Gill
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kathleen M Brown
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Rebecca E Cash
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rachel M Haupt
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Benjamin T Potts
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - P Daniel Patterson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martins MS, Lourenção DCDA, Pimentel RRDS, de Oliveira JM, Manganoti LTDCN, Modesto RC, Silva MSDS, Dos Santos MJ. Recommendations for the safety of hospitalised patients in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060182. [PMID: 36123068 PMCID: PMC9485646 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To map the recommendations for hospitalised patient safety in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN Scoping review using the method recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute. DATA SOURCES Databases: Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, LILACS, CINAHL and IBECS; grey literature platform: Google Scholar; and 11 official websites of leading healthcare institutions were searched on 27 April 2021 and updated on 11 April 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included documents that present recommendations for the safety of hospitalised patients in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, published in any language, from 2020 onwards. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data extraction was performed in pairs with consensus rounds. A descriptive analysis was carried out to present the main characteristics of the articles. Qualitative data from the extraction of recommendations were analysed through content analysis. RESULTS One hundred and twenty-five documents were included. Most papers were identified as expert consensus (n=56, 44.8%). Forty-six recommendations were identified for the safety of hospitalised patients: 17 relating to the reorganisation of health services related to the flow of patients, the management of human and material resources and the reorganisation of the hospital environment; 11 on the approach to the airways and the prevention of the spread of aerosols; 11 related to sanitary and hygiene issues; 4 about proper use of personal protective equipment and 3 for effective communication. CONCLUSIONS The recommendations mapped in this scoping review present the best practices produced so far and serve as a basis for planning and implementing good practices to ensure safe hospital care, during and after COVID-19. The engagement of everyone involved in the care of hospitalised patients is essential to consolidate the mapped recommendations and provide dignified, safe and quality care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Janine Melo de Oliveira
- Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Maceio, Brazil
- Curso de Enfermagem, Universidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas, Maceio, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Marcelo José Dos Santos
- Career Guidance Department, Universidade de São Paulo Escola de Enfermagem, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McCoy AM, Morris D, Tanaka K, Wright A, Guyette FX, Martin-Gill C. Prehospital Noninvasive Ventilation: An NAEMSP Position Statement and Resource Document. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2022; 26:80-87. [PMID: 35001825 DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2021.1993392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV), including bilevel positive airway pressure and continuous positive airway pressure, is a safe and important therapeutic option in the management of prehospital respiratory distress. NAEMSP recommends:NIV should be used in the management of prehospital patients with respiratory failure, such as those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and pulmonary edema.NIV is a safe intervention for use by Emergency Medical Technicians.Medical directors must assure adequate training in NIV, including appropriate patient selection, NIV system operation, administration of adjunctive medications, and assessment of clinical response.Medical directors must implement quality assessment and improvement programs to assure optimal application of and outcomes from NIV.Novel NIV methods such as high-flow nasal cannula and helmet ventilation may have a role in prehospital care.
Collapse
|
5
|
Italian neonatologists and SARS-CoV-2: lessons learned to face coming new waves. Pediatr Res 2022; 91:513-521. [PMID: 33828228 PMCID: PMC8025440 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-021-01477-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this review was threefold: (a) to retrieve all SARS-CoV-2 evidences published by Italian neonatologists working in maternity centers and NICUs during the pandemic; (b) to summarize current evidence for the management of term and preterm infants with a SARS-CoV-2-related illness; and (c) to provide an update for dealing with the second wave of COVID-19 and discuss open questions. A review was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed and the national COVID-19 registry of the Italian Society of Neonatology including citations from December 1, 2019 to October 28, 2020. Sixty-three articles were included. Collected data were divided into the following topics: (a) antenatal management, (b) management in delivery room, (c) postnatal management, (d) mother-baby dyad and breastfeeding management, (e) neonatal emergency transport system reorganization, (f) parents' management and perspective during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, and (g) future perspective. Evidences have evolved over the pandemic period and the current review can be useful in the management of the mother-neonate dyad during SARS-CoV-2 future waves. Italian neonatologists have played an active role in producing official guidelines and reporting data that have contributed to improve the care of neonates. A joint European action plan is mandatory to face COVID-19 in neonates with more awareness. IMPACT: A joint European action plan is mandatory to face COVID-19 in neonates with more awareness. This review summarizes the available evidences from neonatal COVID-19 management in Italy analyzing all the published paper in this specific field of interest. The current review can be useful in the management of the mother-neonate dyad during the SARS-CoV-2 future waves.
Collapse
|
6
|
Bellini C, Gente M, Dufour F, Andreato C, Massirio P, Ramenghi LA. Italian neonatal transport changed during the pandemic due to some hospitals being re-designated for COVID-19 cases. Acta Paediatr 2022; 111:133-134. [PMID: 34558745 PMCID: PMC8652589 DOI: 10.1111/apa.16120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Bellini
- Department of Mother & Child Neonatal Emergency Transport ServiceIRCCS Gaslini Genoa Italy
| | - Maurizio Gente
- Maternal Infant Department Neonatal Emergency Transport ServicePoliclinico Umberto ISapienza University of Rome Rome Italy
| | - Francesca Dufour
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Department of Mother & Child IRCCS GasliniUniversity of Genoa Genoa Italy
| | - Chiara Andreato
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Department of Mother & Child IRCCS GasliniUniversity of Genoa Genoa Italy
| | - Paolo Massirio
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Department of Mother & Child IRCCS GasliniUniversity of Genoa Genoa Italy
| | - Luca Antonio Ramenghi
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Department of Mother & Child IRCCS GasliniUniversity of Genoa Genoa Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ethical responsibilities of European children's teams facing the resurgent COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Pediatr 2022; 181:207-213. [PMID: 34241684 PMCID: PMC8266989 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-021-04185-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The COrona VIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is posing an unprecedented challenge to healthcare systems around the globe. Europe has been struggling for 1 year now, and despite some encouraging progress (above all, the beginning of vaccination), the second wave is ongoing. Even though children are less affected than adults, the COVID-19 pandemic-and in particular the measures to counter it-is having a considerable impact on the paediatric healthcare setting. It is, therefore, the duty of paediatric teams in Europe to prepare for the challenges ahead. We wish to contribute to this necessary preparedness in two ways: firstly, by assessing the direct and indirect impact of the pandemic on children and on the paediatric setting; secondly, and more importantly, by identifying the various responsibilities of paediatric healthcare professionals, in light of established ethical principles. Only abiding by these responsibilities will it be possible to ensure that ill children and their families are properly supported even in these difficult times and to grant that decisions about children's healthcare remain morally justified and lawful. What is Known: • The COVID-19 outbreak is posing an unprecedented challenge to healthcare systems around the globe • Despite the children are less affected than adults, the COVID-19 pandemic is having a huge impact also on paediatric setting What is New: • The COVID-19 pandemic lays out specific responsibilities of paediatric professionals towards our pa-tients, society and ourselves • The paediatric teams in Europe should assess the direct and indirect impact of the pandemic on the chil-dren and on the paediatric settings, ensuring consistency between centres and across regions in Europe.
Collapse
|
8
|
ATS Core Curriculum 2021. Pediatric Pulmonary Medicine: Pulmonary Infections. ATS Sch 2021; 2:452-467. [PMID: 34667993 PMCID: PMC8518607 DOI: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2021-0034re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The following is a concise review of the Pediatric Pulmonary Medicine Core reviewing pediatric pulmonary infections, diagnostic assays, and imaging techniques presented at the 2021 American Thoracic Society Core Curriculum. Molecular methods have revolutionized microbiology. We highlight the need to collect appropriate samples for detection of specific pathogens or for panels and understand the limitations of the assays. Considerable progress has been made in imaging modalities for detecting pediatric pulmonary infections. Specifically, lung ultrasound and lung magnetic resonance imaging are promising radiation-free diagnostic tools, with results comparable with their radiation-exposing counterparts, for the evaluation and management of pulmonary infections. Clinicians caring for children with pulmonary disease should ensure that patients at risk for nontuberculous mycobacteria disease are identified and receive appropriate nontuberculous mycobacteria screening, monitoring, and treatment. Children with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) typically present with mild symptoms, but some may develop severe disease. Treatment is mainly supportive care, and most patients make a full recovery. Anticipatory guidance and appropriate counseling from pediatricians on social distancing and diagnostic testing remain vital to curbing the pandemic. The pediatric immunocompromised patient is at risk for invasive and opportunistic pulmonary infections. Prompt recognition of predisposing risk factors, combined with knowledge of clinical characteristics of microbial pathogens, can assist in the diagnosis and treatment of specific bacterial, viral, or fungal diseases.
Collapse
|
9
|
Stroud MH, Miquel-Verges FF, Rozenfeld RA, Holcomb RG, Brown CC, Meyer K. The State of Neonatal and Pediatric Interfacility Transport During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic. Air Med J 2021; 40:331-336. [PMID: 34535241 PMCID: PMC8106880 DOI: 10.1016/j.amj.2021.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has altered the provision of health care, including interfacility transport of critically ill neonatal and pediatrics patients. Transport medicine faces unique challenges in the care of persons infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. In particular, the multitude of providers, confined spaces for prolonged time periods, varying modes (ground, rotor wing, and fixed wing) of transport, and the need for frequent aerosol-generating procedures place transport personnel at high risk. This study describes the clinical practices, personal protective equipment, and potential exposure risks of a large cohort of neonatal and pediatric interfacility transport teams. METHODS Data for this study came from a survey distributed to members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Transport Medicine. RESULTS Fifty-four teams responded, and 47 reported transporting COVID-19-positive patients. Among the 47 teams, 25% indicated having at least 1 team member convert to COVID-19 positive. A small percentage of teams (40% ground, 40% fixed wing, and 18% rotor wing) reported allowing parental accompaniment during transport. There was no difference in teams with a positive team member among those that do (26%) and do not (25%) allow parents. There was a higher percentage of teams with a positive team member among teams that intubate (32% vs. 0%) and place laryngeal mask airways (34% vs. 0%) during transport. CONCLUSION Our study shows that exceptional care during interfacility transport, including a family-centered approach, can continue during the COVID-19 pandemic. Teams must take steps to protect themselves, as well as the patients and families they serve, in order to mitigate the transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael H Stroud
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, AR.
| | | | - Ranna A Rozenfeld
- The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Hasbro Children's Hospital, Providence, RI
| | | | - Clare C Brown
- Fay W Boozman College of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Keith Meyer
- FIU Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Auriti C, De Rose DU, Mondì V, Stolfi I, Tzialla C. Neonatal SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Practical Tips. Pathogens 2021; 10:pathogens10050611. [PMID: 34067588 PMCID: PMC8157198 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10050611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The recent viral pandemic in Wuhan, Hubei, China has led to the identification of a new species of beta-coronavirus, able to infect humans, the 2019-nCoV, later named SARS-CoV-2. SARS-CoV-2 causes a clinical syndrome named COVID-19, which presents with a spectrum of symptoms ranging from mild upper respiratory tract infection to severe pneumonia, with acute respiratory distress syndrome and frequent death. All age groups are susceptible to the infection, but children, especially infants, seem to be partially spared, having a more favorable clinical course than other age groups. There is currently no clear evidence showing vertical transmission and intrauterine SARS-CoV-2 infection in fetuses of women developing COVID-19 pneumonia in late pregnancy, and even if transmission is possible, the SARS-CoV2 positivity of the mother does not require delivery by caesarean section, does not contraindicate the management of the infant in rooming-in and allows breastfeeding. This review provides an overview on the biology of the virus, on the pathogenesis of the infection, with particular attention to pregnancy and neonatal age, on the clinical presentation of infection in newborns and young infants and summarizes the international recommendations currently available on the clinical care of neonates with SARS-CoV2 infection or at risk of catching the virus. The main objective of the review is to provide an update especially focused to the clinical management of COVID-19 infection in the perinatal and neonatal age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinzia Auriti
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Medical and Surgical Department of Fetus, Newborn and Infant—“Bambino Gesù” Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy;
| | - Domenico Umberto De Rose
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Medical and Surgical Department of Fetus, Newborn and Infant—“Bambino Gesù” Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy;
- Correspondence: or ; Tel.: +39-06-6859-2427; Fax: +39-06-6859-3916
| | - Vito Mondì
- Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Policlinico Casilino Hospital, 00169 Rome, Italy;
| | - Ilaria Stolfi
- Department of Neonatology, Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University, 00161 Rome, Italy;
| | - Chryssoula Tzialla
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Neonatal pathology Unit, Policlinico San Matteo IRCCS Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Li Q, Zhou Q, Xun Y, Liu H, Shi Q, Wang Z, Zhao S, Liu X, Liu E, Fu Z, Chen Y, Luo Z. Quality and consistency of clinical practice guidelines for treating children with COVID-19. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:633. [PMID: 33987331 PMCID: PMC8106101 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-7000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic negatively affects children’s health. Many guidelines have been developed for treating children with COVID-19. The quality of the existing guidelines and the consistency of recommendations remains unknown. Therefore, we aim to review the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for children with COVID-19 systematically. Methods We systematically searched Medline, Embase, guideline-related websites, and Google. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool and Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare (RIGHT) checklist were used to evaluate the methodological and reporting quality of the included guidelines, respectively. The consistency of recommendations across the guidelines and their supporting evidence were analyzed. Results Twenty guidelines were included in this study. The mean AGREE II score and mean RIGHT reporting rate of the included guidelines were 37% (range, 22–62%) and 52% (range, 31–89%), respectively. As for methodological quality, no guideline was classified as high, one guideline (5%) moderate, and 19 (95%) low. In terms of reporting quality, one guideline (5%) was rated as high, 12 guidelines (60%) moderate, and seven (35%) low. Among included guidelines, recommendations varied greatly in the use of remdesivir (recommend: 25%, not recommend: 45%, not report: 30%), interferon (recommend: 15%, not recommend: 50%, not report: 35%), glucocorticoids (recommend: 50%, not recommend: 20%, not report: 30%), and intravenous immune globulin (recommend: 35%, not recommend: 30%, not report: 35%). None of the guidelines cited clinical trials from children with COVID-19. Conclusions The methodological and reporting quality of guidelines for treating children with COVID-19 was not high. Recommendations were inconsistent across different guidelines. The supporting evidence from children with COVID-19 was very limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qinyuan Li
- Department of Respiratory Medicine Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, China
| | - Qi Zhou
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.,Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yangqin Xun
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hui Liu
- School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Qianling Shi
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Zijun Wang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Siya Zhao
- School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiao Liu
- School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Enmei Liu
- Department of Respiratory Medicine Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhou Fu
- Department of Respiratory Medicine Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, China
| | - Yaolong Chen
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.,Lanzhou University Institute of Health Data Science, Lanzhou, China.,WHO Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, China.,GIN Asia, Lanzhou, China.,Chinese GRADE Centre, Lanzhou, China.,Lanzhou University, an Affiliate of the Cochrane China Network, Lanzhou, China
| | - Zhengxiu Luo
- Department of Respiratory Medicine Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic poses many direct and indirect consequences for children's health and associated research. Direct consequences include participation of children in COVID-19 research trials, pausing other research in children and the potential implications of a global economic downturn on future research funding. Collaborative and networked research together with streamlined research processes and use of remote technology have been central to efforts by clinicians and scientists around the world and have proved essential for reducing COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. IMPACT: Maintain streamlined and efficient approaches to research governance and data sharing to facilitate high-quality collaborative research. Ensure early inclusion of children in trials of therapies for diseases that affect all age groups. Paediatric Research Societies should co-ordinate effective processes to define key research questions and develop multinational clinical trials for diagnostics, therapeutics and preventative strategies for infants, children and young people.
Collapse
|
13
|
Predieri B, Leo F, Candia F, Lucaccioni L, Madeo SF, Pugliese M, Vivaccia V, Bruzzi P, Iughetti L. Glycemic Control Improvement in Italian Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Followed Through Telemedicine During Lockdown Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020; 11:595735. [PMID: 33424771 PMCID: PMC7793913 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.595735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE To minimize the wide spread of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, Italy was placed in an almost complete lockdown state that forced people to "stay at home". Aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of lockdown on glycemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) followed through telemedicine. SUBJECTS/METHODS This observational study involved patients with T1D using the real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) Dexcom G6®. Ambulatory glucose profile data from the 3-months before schools closure (November 26, 2019-February 23, 2020; T0) and from the 3-months of consecutive lockdown (February 24-May 18, 2020; T1) were compared. RESULTS Sixty-two children and adolescents (11.1 ± 4.37 years, 50% males) with T1D (median time disease 3.67 years) were enrolled in the study. Insulin total daily dose was unchanged, while time spent on physical activities was decreased (p<0.0001). Despite the lack of statistical significance, median value of the glucose management indicator decreased from 7.4% to 7.25%. Glucose standard deviation (p<0.0001) and coefficient of variation (p=0.001) improved across the study. Median time in range increased from 60.5% to 63.5% (p=0.008), time above range decreased from 37.3% to 34.1% (p=0.048), and time below range decreased from 1.85% to 1.45% (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS Overall, in our children and adolescents with T1D glycemic control improved during lockdown. Despite patients were confined to their homes and limited to exercise, our data suggest that the use of real-time CGM, the continuous parental management, and the telemedicine can display beneficial effects on T1D care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Predieri
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mother, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
- Post-Graduate School of Pediatrics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
- *Correspondence: Barbara Predieri,
| | - Francesco Leo
- Post-Graduate School of Pediatrics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Francesco Candia
- Post-Graduate School of Pediatrics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Laura Lucaccioni
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinic, Modena, Italy
| | - Simona F. Madeo
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinic, Modena, Italy
| | - Marisa Pugliese
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mother, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Valentina Vivaccia
- Department of Metabolic Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinic, Modena, Italy
| | - Patrizia Bruzzi
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinic, Modena, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Iughetti
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mother, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
- Post-Graduate School of Pediatrics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|