All over the MAP: describing pressure variability in acute spinal cord injury

Invasive devices to monitor the intraspinal perfusion pressure in the hemodynamic management of acute spinal cord injury: A systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND

Various methods for measuring intrathecal pressure (ITP) after spinal cord injury (SCI) to guide hemodynamic management have been investigated. To synthesize the current literature, this current study conducted a scoping review of the use of intrathecal devices to monitor ITP during acute management of SCI with the aim of understanding the association between ITP monitoring with physiological and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. All eligible studies were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extracted included number of patients included, severity of injury, characteristics of the intervention-intrathecal device used to record the ITP, outcomes -hemodynamic parameters observed, changes in the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS), total motor scores, association of ITP with other physiological variables.

RESULTS

The search yielded a total of 1,698 articles, of which 30 observational studies and 2 randomized clinical trials were deemed eligible based on their use of an intrathecal invasive device to monitor spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) in patients with SCI. Of these, 9 studies used a lumbar drain, 23 a Codman pressure probe and 1 study that used both. These studies underscore the crucial interplay between ITP, the SCPP and physiological variables, with neurological outcome. It is still unclear whether monitoring from a lumbar drain is accurate enough to highlight what is occurring at the site of SCI, which is the main advantage of Codman Probe, however, the latter requires specialized personnel that may not be available in most settings. Minor adverse effects were associated with lumbar drain catheters, while cerebrospinal fluid leak requiring repair (~ 7%) is the main concern with Codman Probes.

CONCLUSION

Future investigation of SCPP protocols via lumbar drains and Codman probes ought to involve multi-centered randomized controlled trials and continued translational investigation with animal models.

Critical Care of Spinal Cord Injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, posing a significant financial burden on patients and the healthcare system. While little can be done to reverse the primary mechanical insult, minimizing secondary injury due to ischemia and inflammation and avoiding complications that adversely affect neurologic outcome represent major goals of management. This article reviews important considerations in the acute critical care management of SCI to improve outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Neuroprotective agents, such as riluzole, may allow for improved neurologic recovery but require further investigation at this time. Various forms of neuromodulation, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, are currently under investigation. Early decompression and stabilization of SCI is recommended within 24 h of injury when indicated. Spinal cord perfusion may be optimized with a mean arterial pressure goal from a lower limit of 75-80 to an upper limit of 90-95 mmHg for 3-7 days after injury. The use of corticosteroids remains controversial; however, initiation of a 24-h infusion of methylprednisolone 5.4 mg/kg/hour within 8 h of injury has been found to improve motor scores. Attentive pulmonary and urologic care along with early mobilization can reduce in-hospital complications.

A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock

Shock is a life-threatening circulatory failure that results in inadequate tissue perfusion and oxygenation. Vasopressors and inotropes are vasoactive medications that are vital in increasing systemic vascular resistance and cardiac contractility, respectively, in patients presenting with shock. To be well versed in using these agents is an important skill to have in the critical care setting where patients can frequently exhibit symptoms of shock. In this review, we will discuss the pathophysiological mechanisms of shock and evaluate the current evidence behind the management of shock with an emphasis on vasopressors and inotropes.

A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Recommendations on Hemodynamic Management

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical practice guideline development following the GRADE process.

OBJECTIVES

Hemodynamic management is one of the only available treatment options that likely improves neurologic outcomes in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Augmenting mean arterial pressure (MAP) aims to improve blood perfusion and oxygen delivery to the injured spinal cord in order to minimize secondary ischemic damage to neural tissue. The objective of this guideline was to update the 2013 AANS/CNS recommendations on the hemodynamic management of patients with acute traumatic SCI, acknowledging that much has been published in this area since its publication. Specifically, we sought to make recommendations on 1. The range of mean arterial pressure (MAP) to be maintained by identifying an upper and lower MAP limit; 2. The duration of such MAP augmentation; and 3. The choice of vasopressor. Additionally, we sought to make a recommendation on spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) targets.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary guideline development group (GDG) was formed that included health care professionals from a wide range of clinical specialities, patient advocates, and individuals living with SCI. The GDG reviewed the 2013 AANS/CNS guidelines and voted on whether each recommendation should be endorsed or updated. A systematic review of the literature, following PRISMA standards and registered in PROSPERO, was conducted to inform the guideline development process and address the following key questions: (i) what are the effects of goal-directed interventions to optimize spinal cord perfusion on extent of neurological recovery and rates of adverse events at any time point of follow-up? and (ii) what are the effects of particular monitoring techniques, perfusion ranges, pharmacological agents, and durations of treatment on extent of neurological recovery and rates of adverse events at any time point of follow-up? The GDG combined the information from this systematic review with their clinical expertise in order to develop recommendations on a MAP target range (specifically an upper and lower limit to target), the optimal duration for MAP augmentation, and the use of vasopressors or inotropes. Using methods outlined by the GRADE working group, recommendations were formulated that considered the balance of benefits and harms, financial impact, acceptability, feasibility and patient preferences.

RESULTS

The GDG suggested that MAP should be augmented to at least 75-80 mmHg as the "lower limit," but not actively augmented beyond an "upper limit" of 90-95 mmHg in order to optimize spinal cord perfusion in acute traumatic SCI. The quality of the evidence around the "target MAP" was very low, and thus the strength of this recommendation is weak. For duration of hemodynamic management, the GDG "suggested" that MAP be augmented for a duration of 3-7 days. Again, the quality of the evidence around the duration of MAP support was very low, and thus the strength of this recommendation is also weak. The GDG felt that a recommendation on the choice of vasopressor or the use of SCPP targets was not warranted, given the dearth of available evidence.

CONCLUSION

We provide new recommendations for blood pressure management after acute SCI that acknowledge the limitations of the current evidence on the relationship between MAP and neurologic recovery. It was felt that the low quality of existing evidence and uncertainty around the relationship between MAP and neurologic recovery justified a greater range of MAP to target, and for a broader range of days post-injury than recommended in previous guidelines. While important knowledge gaps still remain regarding hemodynamic management, these recommendations represent current perspectives on the role of MAP augmentation for acute SCI.

Interventions to Optimize Spinal Cord Perfusion in Patients With Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: An Updated Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review update.

OBJECTIVES

Interventions that aim to optimize spinal cord perfusion are thought to play an important role in minimizing secondary ischemic damage and improving outcomes in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injuries (SCIs). However, exactly how to optimize spinal cord perfusion and enhance neurologic recovery remains controversial. We performed an update of a recent systematic review (Evaniew et al, J. Neurotrauma 2020) to evaluate the effects of Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) support or Spinal Cord Perfusion Pressure (SCPP) support on neurological recovery and rates of adverse events among patients with acute traumatic SCI.

METHODS

We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov for new published reports. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. We implemented the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to rate confidence in the quality of the evidence.

RESULTS

From 569 potentially relevant new citations since 2019, we identified 9 new studies for inclusion, which were combined with 19 studies from a prior review to give a total of 28 studies. According to low or very low quality evidence, the effect of MAP support on neurological recovery is uncertain, and increased SCPP may be associated with improved neurological recovery. Both approaches may involve risks for specific adverse events, but the importance of these adverse events to patients remains unclear. Very low quality evidence failed to yield reliable guidance about particular monitoring techniques, perfusion ranges, pharmacological agents, or durations of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This update provides an evidence base to support the development of a new clinical practice guideline for the hemodynamic management of patients with acute traumatic SCI. While avoidance of hypotension and maintenance of spinal cord perfusion are important principles in the management of an acute SCI, the literature does not provide high quality evidence in support of a particular protocol. Further prospective, controlled research studies with objective validated outcome assessments are required to examine interventions to optimize spinal cord perfusion in this setting.

Current Practice of Acute Spinal Cord Injury Management: A Global Survey of Members from the AO Spine

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional, international survey.

OBJECTIVES

To examine current international practices as well as knowledge, adoption, and barriers to guideline implementation for acute spinal cord injury (SCI) management.

METHODS

A survey was distributed to members of AO Spine. The questionnaire was structured to obtain demographic data and preferred acute SCI practices surrounding steroid use, hemodynamic management, and timing of surgical decompression.

RESULTS

593 members completed the survey including orthopaedic surgeons (54.3%), neurosurgeons (35.6%), and traumatologists (8.4%). Most (61.2%) respondents were from low and middle-income countries (LMICs). 53.6% of physicians used steroids for the treatment of acute SCIs. Respondents from LMICs were more likely to administer steroids than HICs (178 vs. 78; P < .001). 331 respondents (81.5%) answered that patients would receive mean arterial pressure (MAP) targeted treatment. In LMICs, SCI patients were less likely to be provided with MAP-targeted treatment (76.9%) as compared to HICs (89%; P < .05). The majority of respondents (87.8%) reported that patients would benefit from early decompression. Despite overwhelming evidence and surgeons' responses that would offer early surgery, 62.4% of respondents stated they encounter logistical barriers in their institutions. This was particularly evident in LMICs, where 57.9% of respondents indicated that early intervention was unlikely to be accomplished, while only 21.1% of respondents from HICs stated the same (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

This survey highlights challenges in the implementation of standardized global practices in the management of acute SCI. Future research efforts will need to refine SCI guidelines and address barriers to guideline implementation.

The Clinical Relevance of Autonomic Dysfunction, Cerebral Hemodynamics, and Sleep Interactions in Individuals Living With SCI

A myriad of physiological impairments is seen in individuals after a spinal cord injury (SCI). These include altered autonomic function, cerebral hemodynamics, and sleep. These physiological systems are interconnected and likely insidiously interact leading to secondary complications. These impairments negatively influence quality of life. A comprehensive review of these systems, and their interplay, may improve clinical treatment and the rehabilitation plan of individuals living with SCI. Thus, these physiological measures should receive more clinical consideration. This special communication introduces the under investigated autonomic dysfunction, cerebral hemodynamics, and sleep disorders in people with SCI to stakeholders involved in SCI rehabilitation. We also discuss the linkage between autonomic dysfunction, cerebral hemodynamics, and sleep disorders and some secondary outcomes are discussed. Recent evidence is synthesized to make clinical recommendations on the assessment and potential management of important autonomic, cerebral hemodynamics, and sleep-related dysfunction in people with SCI. Finally, a few recommendations for clinicians and researchers are provided.

Significance of spinal cord perfusion pressure following spinal cord injury: A systematic scoping review

This scoping review systematically reviewed relevant research to summarize the literature addressing the significance of monitoring spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) in acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). The objectives of the review were to (1) examine the nature of research in the field of SCPP monitoring in SCI, (2) summarize the key research findings in the field, and (3) identify research gaps in the existing literature and future research priorities. Primary literature searches were conducted using databases (Medline and Embase) and expanded searches were conducted by reviewing the references of eligible articles and searches of Scopus, Web of Science core collection, Google Scholar, and conference abstracts. Relevant data were extracted from the studies and synthesis of findings was guided by the identification of patterns across studies to identify key themes and research gaps within the literature. Following primary and expanded searches, a total of 883 articles were screened. Seventy-three articles met the review inclusion criteria, including 34 original research articles. Other articles were categorized as conference abstracts, literature reviews, systematic reviews, letters to the editor, perspective articles, and editorials. Key themes relevant to the research question that emerged from the review included the relationship between SCPP and neurological recovery, the safety of monitoring pressures within the intrathecal space, and methods of intervention to enhance SCPP in the setting of acute traumatic SCI. Original research that aims to enhance SCPP by targeting increases in mean arterial pressure or reducing pressure in the intrathecal space is reviewed. Further discussion regarding where pressure within the intrathecal space should be measured is provided. Finally, we highlight research gaps in the literature such as determining the feasibility of invasive monitoring at smaller centers, the need for a better understanding of cerebrospinal fluid physiology following SCI, and novel pharmacological interventions to enhance SCPP in the setting of acute traumatic SCI. Ultimately, despite a growing body of literature on the significance of SCPP monitoring following SCI, there are still a number of important knowledge gaps that will require further investigation.