Cauda equina syndrome in an obese pregnant patient secondary to double level lumbar disc herniation - A case report and review of literature

Lumbar disk herniation in pregnancy: its incidence, presentation and management: a systematic review

Background

Back pain in pregnancy is common, but pain from lumbar disk herniations in pregnancy is rare. This systematic review aims to comprehensively analyse literature on lumbar disk herniation in pregnancy, focusing on risk factors, incidence, clinical presentation, and management.

Methods

We conducted a literature review using PubMed and Web of Science databases, including studies from January 1, 1950, to August 1, 2023. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist for cohort studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for case-control studies were utilised to assess risk of bias. The review protocol was not previously published.

Results

A total of 41 studies were reviewed, with 6 addressing incidence and risk factors and 35 focusing on clinical presentation and management. Symptomatic lumbar disk herniation during pregnancy was found to be uncommon, with no significant predisposition noted during pregnancy as per magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. However, patients with MRI-detected herniations were more likely to report back pain. Non-surgical management resulted in higher rates of complete symptom resolution (69% vs. 50%) and lower rates of cesarean section (57% vs. 70%) compared to surgical management. Among surgically treated patients, microdiscectomy showed higher symptom resolution (59%) compared to laminectomy (17%) or a combined approach (33%).

Conclusions

While pregnancy does not inherently increase the risk of herniated lumbar disks, the presence of a prolapsed disk can predispose to back pain during pregnancy. There is poor quality evidence that should be interpreted cautiously. Non-surgical management, in the absence of red-flag symptoms including bowel and bladder dysfunction may be trialled and yield comparatively better symptom resolution. Additionally, surgical management if necessitated has no clear link to pregnancy complications within the scope of this study.

Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Cauda Equina Syndrome Management During Pregnancy

Cauda equina during pregnancy represents a rare entity, with data regarding optimal treatment being very scarce in the pertinent literature. Given the scarcity of current evidence on the topic, this study conducts a systematic review and analysis of existing literature concerning cauda equina syndrome (CES) management in pregnant women. A comprehensive search was performed across multiple databases, yielding 26 level IV peer-reviewed articles that met the inclusion criteria. These studies collectively encompassed 30 pregnant patients with CES, with a mean age of 31.2 years and an average gestational age of 26 weeks. Disc herniation emerged as the primary cause in 73% of cases. Regarding surgical interventions, the prone position was utilised in 70% of cases, with 73% receiving general anaesthesia. Notably, third-trimester spinal surgeries exhibited a higher complete recovery rate compared to earlier trimesters. Minimally invasive spinal surgery demonstrated superior outcomes in terms of complete recovery and reduced risk of persistent post-operative symptoms when compared to open approaches. Moreover, patients undergoing caesarean section (CS) after spinal surgery reported higher rates of symptom resolution and lower symptom persistence compared to those with CS before spinal surgery or vaginal delivery post-spinal surgery. Despite these study's findings, the overall evidence base remains limited, precluding definitive conclusions. Consequently, the study underscores the importance of multidisciplinary team discussions to formulate optimal treatment strategies for pregnant individuals presenting with CES. This highlights a critical need for further research to expand the knowledge base and improve the guidance available for managing CES in pregnant populations.

Positioning issues of spinal surgery during pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Albeit rarely, different spinal pathologies may require surgical treatment during pregnancy. The management of such cases poses a series of challenges, starting with adequate body positioning.

OBJECTIVE

To illustrate limits and indications of the different surgical positioning strategies for pregnant women undergoing spine surgery.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of literature about the described surgical positioning strategies used for spinal surgery during pregnancy, discussing advantages, indications, and limits. We also describe of a novel three-quarters prone positioning for dorsal pathology.

RESULTS

The surgical strategy may vary according to several factors, such as the location and the nature of the underlying pathology, the stage of the pregnancy, and the clinical condition of mother and fetus. During the second trimester, the habitus begins to raise issues about both the abdominal and the aortocaval compressions. The third trimester implies neonatal and ethical challenges: both fetal monitoring and the possibility of urgently proceeding to delivery should be guaranteed. The prone position is feasible during the second trimester provided an adequate frame is supplied. The lateral or three-quarters prone positioning may offer the safest option in the last stages of pregnancy, whereas both supine and sitting positionings are anecdotal.

CONCLUSIONS

Gestational age, surgical comfort and maternofetal safety should be balanced by a multidisciplinary team to tailor an adequate positioning plan for each individual case. The early third trimester is the more limiting period because of the womb hindrance favoring lateral or three-quarters positionings.