1
|
Esquivel NS, Tzeng JP, Treiman K, Husick CH, Sheridan J, Ortiz-Ravick L, Sae-Hau M, Brown L, DeMairo K, Bell N, Disare K, Weiss ES. Understanding Myeloma-Related Information Needs and Communication Preferences Within Black American Communities: An Exploratory Study. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2024:10.1007/s13187-024-02480-3. [PMID: 39147998 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02480-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
Myeloma is the third most common blood cancer and one of the most complex and expensive cancers to treat. Black Americans face health disparities related to myeloma incidence, age at diagnosis, access to novel treatments, and mortality. To help reduce health disparities among Black Americans through education and outreach, the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society has implemented its Myeloma Link initiative. In 2022, a formative, qualitative evaluation was conducted across the 15 U.S. cities that implemented Myeloma Link to better understand the information and communication needs and preferences of three groups: patients, community members, and primary care providers (PCPs). Data collection included interviews with eight patients, two focus groups with a total of ten community members, and interviews with six PCPs. Patients expressed wanting information about treatment experiences, including clinical trials, and emotional and peer support services, particularly from other Black American patients. Community members were largely unfamiliar with myeloma and desired outreach via trusted community organizations about disease signs and symptoms. Both groups discussed the importance of self-advocacy within the current healthcare system and wanted actionable messaging, rather than messaging leading with disparities statistics. PCPs described systemic capacity and time challenges in the context of needing to address more frequently encountered health conditions; nonetheless, PCPs welcomed information and brief trainings about myeloma diagnosis and treatment options, referrals to specialists, and how to improve care, prognosis, and caregiver support. Findings underscore the importance of outreach initiatives such as Myeloma Link to help meet these needs and reduce health disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N S Esquivel
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - J P Tzeng
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, USA
| | - K Treiman
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, USA
| | - C H Husick
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, USA
| | - J Sheridan
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - M Sae-Hau
- The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Rye Brook, NY, USA
| | - L Brown
- The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Rye Brook, NY, USA
| | - K DeMairo
- The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Rye Brook, NY, USA
| | - N Bell
- The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Rye Brook, NY, USA
| | - K Disare
- The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Rye Brook, NY, USA
| | - E S Weiss
- The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Rye Brook, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fyfe R, Anstis O, Kapadia K, Jordan M, Sword DO, Weinkove R. Experiences and perspectives on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy among recipients, carers and referrers (RE-TELL): a qualitative study to inform CAR T-cell service design. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e071112. [PMID: 38262637 PMCID: PMC10824048 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES RE-TELL is a qualitative study, which aims to understand patient, support person, clinician and coordinator experiences and perspectives of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, to inform design of a clinical CAR T-cell service in Aotearoa New Zealand. DESIGN Semistructured qualitative interviews focused on domains of: experience through treatment, elements that work well and those that could be improved on. Interviews used thematic analysis to identify key themes. A workshop was held to obtain participants' reflections on interim analysis and proposed improvements. PARTICIPANTS New Zealanders with experience of CAR T-cell therapy, including recipients, support persons, clinicians and coordinators. RESULTS We interviewed 19 participants comprising 5 CAR T-cell recipients, 3 support persons, 6 clinicians and 5 coordinators. Four participants identified as Māori. Thematic analysis identified three global themes. The first, 'sociocultural factors impact CAR T access', identified potential sources of inequity including geographic, financial and informed consent barriers. The second, 'varying emotions, roles and enablers', identified an easier treatment experience compared with alternatives; an underwhelming cell administration process; frustration with inpatient monitoring; burden on support persons and importance of 'bridge' organisations such as charities and patient support groups. Lastly, 'golden opportunities: reimagining CAR T service delivery', suggested: improved geographical access to CAR T-cell therapy, while retaining consolidated clinician experience; a 'dashboard' with information on CAR T-cell treatment, time frames and manufacture; a health navigator to co-ordinate non-medical aspects of treatment and signpost care; embedding of indigenous data sovereignty and ownership of cells; a cell infusion ceremony, incorporating family involvement and Māori cultural elements and outpatient administration and monitoring where possible. CONCLUSION This study documented the current experience of New Zealanders receiving CAR T-cell therapy and identified opportunities for future service development. These insights are relevant to service design within Aotearoa New Zealand, and other countries developing equitable CAR T-cell services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Fyfe
- Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand
- Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Olivia Anstis
- Health Advisory, Deloitte Limited, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Mallory Jordan
- Health Advisory, Deloitte Limited, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Robert Weinkove
- Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand
- Te Rerenga Ora Blood & Cancer Centre, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Capital Coast and Hutt Valley, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Doucette K, Taylor AO, Chan B, Ma X, Ahn J, Vesole DH, Lai C. Hospital facility characteristics and socioeconomic factors on outcomes and treatment in patients with multiple myeloma: National Cancer Database analysis. Ann Hematol 2023; 102:1443-1458. [PMID: 37093241 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05194-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that socioeconomic factors play an important role in multiple myeloma (MM) health outcomes. We postulated that the type of treatment facilities and their volume of cases also affect overall survival, utilization of various therapies including palliative care services in newly diagnosed MM. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we analyzed 174,551 newly diagnosed MM participants from across the country. We found that at high volume facility centers (over 90th percentile of new patient volume from 2004 to 2016), the median overall survival (OS) was 62.3 months versus 35.3 months at lower volume facilities (p <0.001). Similarly, high volume academic cancer centers had an improved median OS of 66.4 months (65.3-67.4 CI) versus 39.2 months (37.9-40.4 months CI) in lower volume academic centers (p <0.001). The odds of utilizing chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and autologous transplants were higher in academic cancer centers compared to community cancer centers, after adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic factors (OR 1.10, 1.23, and 2.06 respectively, all with p<0.001). There was significantly decreased odds of receiving palliative care (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.85-0.93) in high volume facilities compared to low volume. Palliative care services were more frequently utilized at integrated network cancers and comprehensive community cancer centers compared to community cancer centers, with similar odds of receiving palliative care between community and academic facility types. Our results likely reflect increased provider experience and resources in higher volume and academic facilities. This highlights the need to integrate resources and improve access to community programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberley Doucette
- Divison of Hematology and Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
| | - Allison O Taylor
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Bryan Chan
- Divison of Hematology and Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Xiaoyang Ma
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jaeil Ahn
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - David H Vesole
- Divison of Hematology and Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Hackensack Meridian John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Catherine Lai
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gagelmann N, Sureda A, Montoto S, Murray J, Bolaños N, Kenyon M, Beksac M, Schönland S, Hayden P, Scheurer H, Morgan K, Garderet L, McLornan DP, Ruggeri A. Access to and affordability of CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma: an EBMT position paper. Lancet Haematol 2022; 9:e786-e795. [PMID: 36174641 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(22)00226-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a promising immunotherapeutic approach in the treatment of multiple myeloma, and the recent approval of the first two CAR T-cell products could result in improved outcomes. However, it remains a complex and expensive technology, which poses challenges to health-care systems and society in general, especially in times of crises. This potentially accelerates pre-existing inequalities as access to CAR T-cell therapy varies, both between countries, depending on the level of economic development, and within countries, due to structural disparities in access to quality health care-a parameter strongly correlated with socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and lifestyle. Here, we identify two important issues: affordability and access to CAR T-cell treatment. This consensus statement from clinical investigators, clinicians, nurses, and patients from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) proposes solutions as part of an innovative collaborative strategy to make CAR T-cell therapy accessible to all patients with multiple myeloma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nico Gagelmann
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Anna Sureda
- Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia Montoto
- St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - John Murray
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Michelle Kenyon
- Department of Haematology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Meral Beksac
- Department of Hematology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Stefan Schönland
- Medical Department V, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Hayden
- Department of Hematology, Trinity College Dublin, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Laurent Garderet
- Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Donal P McLornan
- Department of Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Annalisa Ruggeri
- Hematology and BMT Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|