Final outcomes of escalated melphalan 280 mg/m2 with amifostine cytoprotection followed autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: high CR and VGPR rates do not translate into improved survival

Modulatory effect of amifostine (WR-1065) against genotoxicity and oxidative stress induced by methotrexate in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs)

Amifostine is used in chemotherapy and radiotherapy as a cytoprotective adjuvant alongside DNA-binding chemotherapeutic agents. It functions by reducing free radicals and detoxifying harmful metabolites. Methotrexate, as an antimetabolite drug has been considered for treating various cancers and autoimmune diseases. However, the cytotoxic effects of methotrexate extend beyond tumor cells to crucial organs, including the heart. This study applied the HUVEC cell line as a reference in vitro model for researching the characteristics of vascular endothelium and cardiotoxicity. The current study aimed to assess amifostine's potential cytoprotective properties against methotrexate-induced cellular damage. Cytotoxicity was measured using the MTT assay. Apoptotic rates were evaluated by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining via flow cytometry. The genoprotective effect of amifostine was determined using the comet assay. Cells were exposed to various amifostine doses (10-200 μg/mL) and methotrexate (2.5 μM) in pretreatment culture condition. Methotrexate at 2.5 μM revealed cytotoxicity, apoptosis, oxidative stress and genotoxicity while highlighting amifostine's cyto/geno protective properties on HUVECs. Amifostine significantly decreased the levels of ROS and LPO while preserving the status of GSH and SOD activity. Furthermore, it inhibited genotoxicity (tail length, %DNA in tail, and tail moment) in the comet assay. Amifostine markedly attenuated methotrexate-induced apoptotic cell death (early and late apoptotic rates). These findings convey that amifostine can operate as a cytoprotectant agent.

Survival outcomes following autologous stem cell transplant with melphalan 140mg/m2 versus 200mg/m2 preparative regimens in patients with multiple myeloma

The standard preparative regimen for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) is 200 mg/m2 of intravenous melphalan; however, a dose of 140 mg/m2 is often used when concerns exist related to patient age, performance status, organ function, and other factors. It is unclear whether a lower dose of melphalan impacts post-transplant survival outcomes. We performed a retrospective review of 930 patients with MM who underwent ASCT with 200 mg/m2 versus 140 mg/m2 melphalan. On univariable analysis, no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) was observed, however, an overall survival (OS) benefit was observed in patients receiving 200 mg/m2 melphalan (p = 0.04). Multivariable analyses showed patients receiving 140 mg/m2 faired no worse than those receiving 200 mg/m2. While a subset of younger patients with normal renal function may achieve superior OS with a standard dose of 200 mg/m2 melphalan, these findings suggest an opportunity to individualize the ASCT preparative regimen to optimize outcomes.

Revisiting the Role of Alkylating Agents in Multiple Myeloma: Up-to-Date Evidence and Future Perspectives

From the 1960s to the early 2000s, alkylating agents (e.g., melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and bendamustine) remained a key component of standard therapy for newly-diagnosed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Later on, their associated toxicities (including second primary malignancies) and the unprecedented efficacy of novel therapies have led clinicians to increasingly consider alkylator-free approaches. Meanwhile, new alkylating agents (e.g., melflufen) and new applications of old alkylators (e.g., lymphodepletion before chimeric antigen receptor T-cell [CAR-T] therapy) have emerged in recent years. Given the expanding use of antigen-directed modalities (e.g., monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, and CAR-T therapy), this review explores the current and future role of alkylating agents in different treatment settings (e.g., induction, consolidation, stem cell mobilization, pre-transplant conditioning, salvage, bridging, and lymphodepleting chemotherapy) to ellucidate the role of alkylator-based regimens in modern-day MM management.

Tandem autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation with sequential use of total marrow irradiation and high-dose melphalan in multiple myeloma

The goal of this phase II trial was to evaluate safety and efficacy of a tandem autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) using sequentially total marrow irradiation (TMI) at the dose of 12 Gy (4 Gy on days -3, -2, and -1) and melphalan 200 mg/m² for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). TMI was performed using helical tomotherapy. Additional "boosts" (total 24 Gy) were applied for patients with active lesions as revealed by PET-FDG. Fifty patients with median age 58 years (41-64 years) were included and received tandem auto-HCT. TMI resulted in absolute neutropenia in all patients. Grade 3 infections were reported in 30% patients. Other toxicities were rare. Proportion of patients who achieved at least very good partial response increased from 46% before the first auto-HCT to 82% after tandem transplantation. Complete remission rates changed from 10% to 42%, respectively. The probabilities of overall and progression-free survival at 5 years were 74% and 55%, respectively. No patient died without progression. We conclude that conditioning with TMI ± PET-guided "boosts" represents personalized treatment approach in MM and is characterized by very good toxicity profile. Tandem auto-HCT using TMI in sequence with high-dose melphalan appears safe with encouraging early efficacy.

Development of a method for clinical pharmacokinetic testing to allow for targeted Melphalan dosing in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous transplant

AIMS

High dose melphalan (HDM) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is standard of care for multiple myeloma (MM), but there is significant variability in melphalan exposure (area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve, AUC) when using body surface area-based dosing. Our aim was to establish a method of pharmacokinetic (PK) testing for real-time melphalan dose adjustments.

METHODS

We performed a prospective PK study of melphalan 140 or 200 mg/m2 in MM patients undergoing ASCT. Twenty MM patients were administered HDM on days -2 and - 1, with PK sampling at 8-10 time points. PK testing was performed on day -2 in all patients, and on day -1 in 5 patients.

RESULTS

Less than 20% interpatient variation in the day -2 and - 1 AUC was observed. The day -2 range in AUC (4.95-11.28 mg h/L) confirmed significant interpatient variability. The hypothetical total dose ranged from 133-302 mg/m2 to achieve the total median AUC. A 4-time point AUC (0, 30, 150 and 240 min) highly correlated with the AUC from the 8-time point schedule. A higher AUC correlated with increased risk of febrile neutropenia (P = .05).

CONCLUSION

Here we outline the methods to establish novel melphalan dosing using PK testing in MM patients undergoing ASCT to target a desired melphalan AUC.

Stem-cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: how far have we come?

High-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) has historically been an essential part of multiple myeloma (MM) management since early studies demonstrated its efficacy in relapsed disease, and subsequent phase III trials demonstrated better responses and improved survival with this modality compared with standard chemotherapy. With further advances in the MM treatment landscape, including the development of potent novel agents, there has been an increasing debate around various aspects of ASCT, including the optimal timing, role of single versus tandem ASCT, and the practice of consolidation and maintenance therapy post-ASCT. Routine incorporation of the novel agents at each of the treatment phases, induction, consolidation when used, and maintenance has led to better responses as reflected by increasing rates of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, longer progression-free survival (PFS) with improvement in overall survival (OS) and in some of the trials. The phase III trials over the last decade have provided significant clarity on the current approach, and have raised important questions regarding the applicability of this modality in all patients. This review aims to summarize the latest literature in the field and discusses how these findings impact the practice of ASCT today.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloma: Time for an Obituary or Not Just Yet!

The management of myeloma has evolved dramatically in the last two decades. High dose melphalan and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) marked the beginning of this journey. This was followed by an explosion of novel agents which were approved for management of myeloma. Allogeneic HSCT which was deemed as the only curative option was largely abhorred due to high transplant-related mortality (TRM) until the advent of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). An approach of tandem autologous and RIC-allogeneic transplantations has showed the best promise for cure for this condition, particularly for those with high-risk cytogenetics. Yet, allogeneic HSCT seems to have fallen out of favor due to the projected high TRM and late relapses, even though the alternatives do not offer a cure, but merely prolong survival. Offering an allogeneic HSCT as a final resort in unlikely to yield gratifying results. At the same time, allogeneic HSCT needs to evolve in a disease-specific manner to address the relevant concerns regarding TRM and relapse. With the introduction of effective GVHD prophylaxis in the form of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide, transplantation from a haploidentical family donor has become a reality. The challenge lies in segregating graft-vs-myeloma effect from a graft-versus-host effect. We discuss the pro-survival and anti-apoptotic pathways via CD28-CD86 interactions which confer survival advantages to myeloma cells and the possibility of disruption of this pathway in the context of haploidentical transplantation through the use of CTLA4Ig without incurring T cell alloreactivity.

Current status of autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma

More than 30 years after its introduction, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains the standard of care for young patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Not only did the arrival of novel agents such as immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PI) and monoclonal antibodies not replace ASCT, instead they solidified its central role as standard of care. Novel agent use is now inarguably essential in induction, maintenance, and possibly consolidation. In light of these new advancements, new challenges arise in deciding on optimal practice. Who is most suited to undergo ASCT? Is there an age threshold that should not be surpassed? Should transplantation be embarked on early or is it reasonable to delay it? What are the optimal induction, consolidation, and maintenance therapies? What is the role of tandem transplantation in the era of novel agents and where do patient-specific cytogenetics come into the equation when deciding on treatment? These are some of the questions addressed in this review which we will attempt to answer with the latest currently available data.