Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential in older patients having received an allogeneic stem cell transplantation from young donors

Clonal hematopoiesis in the setting of hematopoietic cell transplantation

Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) in autologous transplant recipients and allogeneic transplant donors has genetic features and clinical associations that are distinct from each other and from non-cancer populations. CH in the setting of autologous transplant is enriched for mutations in DNA damage response pathway genes and is associated with adverse outcomes, including an increased risk of therapy-related myeloid neoplasm and inferior overall survival. Studies of CH in allogeneic transplant donors have yielded conflicting results but have generally shown evidence of potentiated alloimmunity in recipients, with some studies showing an association with favorable recipient outcomes.

[Relevance of clonal hematopoiesis for cellular therapies]

The detection of clonal hematopoiesis (CH) in patients with hematologic neoplasms who are undergoing a cellular therapy is common. The most frequently used cellular therapy procedures include autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and, more recently, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‑cell therapy. All three procedures differ fundamentally in terms of harvesting and manufacturing aspects as well as usage of the respective cell product. Therefore, the importance of CH in relation to the respective treatment method must be evaluated and assessed differently. In autologous HSCT, the extent of previous cytotoxic therapy significantly contributes to the high prevalence of CH. The clinically most important aspect is the development of secondary neoplasms from a pre-existing CH clone and the potential risk for enhanced cardiovascular side effects. In allogeneic HSCT, the donor selection with respect to the age largely determines the probability for the presence of CH. In this setting, the development of secondary malignancies only plays a minor role compared to the autologous HSCT. In fact, the induction of a graft versus host (GvH) or a graft versus leukemia (GvL) effect and its influence on progression-free and overall survival seem to be of possible clinical relevance. The CAR T‑cell therapy is closely linked to inflammatory reactions regarding its mode of action and the associated side effects. In this context CH might be closely linked to the effectiveness and side effects of the CAR T‑cell therapy. Initial data reported a high prevalence of CH in patients before CAR T‑cell therapy and indicated an increased rate of inflammatory side effects, although no negative effect on survival has yet been demonstrated.

From Patient Material to New Discoveries: a Methodological Review and Guide for Intestinal Stem Cell Researchers

Intestinal stem cells (ISC) are characterized by their ability to continuously self-renew and differentiate into various functionally distinct intestinal epithelial cell types. Impaired stem cell proliferation and differentiation can cause severe dysfunction of the gastrointestinal tract and lead to the development of several clinical disorders. Animal mouse models provide a valuable platform to study ISC function, disease mechanisms, and the intestinal epithelium's regenerative capacity upon tissue damage. However, advanced in vitro systems that are more relevant to human physiology are needed to understand better the diverse disease-triggering factors and the heterogeneity in clinical manifestations. Intestinal biopsies from patients might serve as potent starting material for such "gut-in-a-dish" approaches. While many promising tools for intestinal tissue processing, in vitro expansion, and downstream analysis have been developed in recent years, a comprehensive guide with recommendations to successfully launch or improve intestinal stem cell culture is missing. In this review, we present a selection of currently established methods, highlight recent publications and discuss the potential and limitations of those methodological approaches to facilitate and support the future design of novel and more personalized therapeutic options.

Clonal hematopoiesis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is characterized by the acquisition of somatic mutations and subsequent expansion of mutated hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) clones without clinical evidence for a hematologic neoplasm. The prevalence of CH continuously increases with age reaching double-digit percentages in individuals >60 years. CH is associated with an increased risk for hematologic neoplasms and cardiovascular disease. We will review recent efforts to investigate how CH influences patient outcomes in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation - both autologous (ASCT) and allogeneic (allo-HSCT).

RECENT FINDINGS

Donor-engrafted CH is common in allo-HSCT recipients. Apart from a higher incidence of chronic GvHD and the rare but devastating complication of donor-derived leukemia, CH does not appear to negatively impact outcomes in allo-HSCT recipients. In lymphoma patients undergoing ASCT, however, CH is associated with an excess mortality driven by therapy-related myeloid neoplasms and cardiovascular events. Interestingly, inferior overall survival in patients with CH undergoing ASCT for multiple myeloma (MM) is due to an increased rate of MM progression.

SUMMARY

CH is highly prevalent in both allo-HSCT and ASCT patients suggesting a clinically relevant but context-dependent impact on adverse outcomes. Given the current lack of therapeutic interventions, systematic screening for CH in the transplant setting is currently not indicated outside of clinical studies.

Tumor DNA as a Cancer Biomarker through the Lens of Colorectal Neoplasia

Biomarkers have a wide range of applications in the clinical management of cancer, including screening and therapeutic management. Tumor DNA released from neoplastic cells has become a particularly active area of cancer biomarker development due to the critical role somatic alterations play in the pathophysiology of cancer and the ability to assess released tumor DNA in accessible clinical samples, in particular blood (i.e., liquid biopsy). Many of the early applications of tumor DNA as a biomarker were pioneered in colorectal cancer due to its well-defined genetics and common occurrence, the effectiveness of early detection, and the availability of effective therapeutic options. Herein, in the context of colorectal cancer, we describe how the intended clinical application dictates desired biomarker test performance, how features of tumor DNA provide unique challenges and opportunities for biomarker development, and conclude with specific examples of clinical application of tumor DNA as a biomarker with particular emphasis on early detection.See all articles in this CEBP Focus section, "NCI Early Detection Research Network: Making Cancer Detection Possible."

Prevalence and characteristics of myeloproliferative neoplasms with concomitant monoclonal gammopathy

Of BCR-ABL negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients, 3-14 % display a concomitant monoclonal gammopathy (MGUS). Nonetheless, literature on co-occurring MPN and MGUS is scarce, the molecular underpinnings are unknown and it is unclear whether patients require a specific management. Here, we compared the clinical and genetic features of MPN patients with and without concomitant MGUS. Of 114 MPN patients prospectively studied by serum immunofixation (median age, 67 years; 36.0 % essential thrombocythemia [ET], 24.6 % polycythemia vera [PV], 11.4 % secondary myelofibrosis [sMF], 28.1 % primary myelofibrois [PMF]; 73.7 % JAK2 V617F positive), 10 (9 %) harbored an M-protein. No relevant clinical differences existed between MPN patients with or without M-protein. Seven additional MPN/MGUS patients were retrospectively identified in our MPN registry, yielding a total of 17 patients (7 ET, 3 PV, 3 sMF, 4 PMF). One patient developed multiple myeloma (MM) and one smoldering MM. Seven of 12 patients analyzed carried mutations (e.g. in ASXL1 or TET2) in addition to those in JAK2 or CALR, and 4 of 10 patients showed aberrant cytogenetics. M-protein was mainly IgG (12/17), followed by IgM (4/17). In the two patients that underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation mutant JAK2 and M-protein were no longer detectable post-transplant. In conclusion, MGUS prevalence in our cohort was in the range of previous reports and at most slightly higher than expected in the general population. MGUS presence did not correlate with a specific MPN entity, clinical features or genetic alterations. Our observations suggest that there is no strong clinical or biological relationship between the occurrence of MGUS and MPN.