Randomized phase II trial of extracorporeal phototherapy and steroids vs. steroids alone for newly diagnosed acute GVHD

Treatment of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease with extracorporeal photopheresis: Update of best practice recommendations from Italian Society of Hemapheresis and Cell Manipulation (SIdEM) and the Italian Transplant Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation, Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Cell Therapy (GITMO)

These guidelines represent a GRADE-method revision of the recommendations produced by the Italian Society of Hemapheresis and Cell Manipulation (SIDEM) and the Italian Transplant Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation, Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Cell Therapy (GITMO) in 2013. Since 2013 several studies have been published that have strengthened the role of ECP in the management of GVHD. Thus, it was deemed appropriate to proceed with an update, with the aim to define uniform criteria for the application of ECP in adult and pediatric patients affected by GVHD throughout the national territory, in line with international guidelines, in maintaining of high standards of safety for patients and quality of the procedures provide. Post-HSCT GvHD therapies other than ECP and ECP therapy of other diseases, such as CTCL, are not covered by these guidelines.The development panel for this guideline includes professionals from various specialties who routinely interact in the management of the patient with GVHD, namely the transfusionist, the adult and pediatric hematologist, and the hospital pharmacist. A hematologist experienced in systematic reviews and GRADE guideline development ccordinated the development process, and an experienced transfusionist coordinated the assignment of tasks and reporting. External reviewers of the guideline included a patient representative.

Recent advances in acute gastrointestinal graft versus host disease (aGvHD): aspects of steroid-resistant disease

Acute Graft versus Host Disease (aGvHD) is a common immunological complication occurring in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Moreover, aGvHD is associated with a higher risk of infections and metabolic complications, affecting non-relapse mortality. Progress in transplantation has changed the prophylactic and therapeutic strategies of aGvHD and improved patient outcomes. The standard first-line therapy remains steroids, with a response rate of about 50%. The Janus Kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor, ruxolitinib, is an effective second-line therapy. The management of patients who developed a disease that is refractory to steroids and ruxolitinib, especially in the severe gastrointestinal forms of aGvHD, is not validated and remains an unmet medical need. In the article, we present the current clinical practice, as well as the latest advances targeting pathophysiological pathways of GvHD and gut microbiota, which may be a potential future of aGvHD therapy.

Recent insights into extracorporeal photopheresis for graft-versus-host disease

INTRODUCTION

Extracorporeal Photopheresis (ECP) may be considered the unique large-scale cell therapy currently available. It is currently employed mainly as second-line treatment, especially in steroid-resistant or steroid-dependent Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD) with good results and very few limitations.

AREAS COVERED

Many points need to be clarified regarding the ECP mechanism of action, that conditions the lack of uniqueness among the different centers, essentially cycle frequency, treatment duration, and the number of cells to be treated to obtain a response, according to the organs involved. Moreover, reliable biomarkers for prediction of response are lacking, as well as the best pharmacological combination. We will focus on the recent advances concerning ECP for GvHD treatment. We performed a systematic literature research in Pubmed and Embase as of September 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

The recent studies on ECP mechanism of action along with the promising biomarkers of response, and the synergistic benefit of ECP in association with the new drugs render this therapy an important weapon for GvHD resistant to conventional treatment and can be proposed as a valid first-line therapy option with promising results. We believe that it should be used early in all categories of patients, considering its high safety profile.

Mode of action, indications and recommendations on extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP)

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has gained importance in the treatment of several diseases. Initially introduced as a new therapeutic modality for the treatment of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, the indications for the use of ECP have expanded to include hematology and transplantation immunology. Extracorporeal photopheresis has found its place in the treatment plan of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, systemic sclerosis, graft-versus-host disease, organ transplantation such as heart and lung, sometimes as first-line therapy and very often in combination with various systemic immunosuppressive therapies. The procedure basically consists of three steps: leukapheresis, photoactivation and reinfusion. The following article presents possible theories about the mechanism of action, which is not yet fully understood, and discusses the five most common indications for ECP treatment with corresponding therapy recommendations.

Wirkweise, Indikationen und Therapieempfehlungen der extrakorporalen Photopherese (ECP)

Die extrakorporale Photopherese (ECP) hat in jüngster Zeit bei der Behandlung verschiedener Krankheiten an Bedeutung gewonnen. Ursprünglich als neue Therapie zur Behandlung von Patienten mit kutanem T‐Zell‐Lymphom vorgestellt, hat sich der Indikationsbereich für die ECP auf Hämatologie und Transplantationsimmunologie erweitert. Die ECP hat ihren festen Platz im Therapieplan bei kutanen T‐Zell‐Lymphomen, systemischer Sklerose, Graft‐versus‐Host‐Erkrankung, Organtransplantationen wie Herz und Lunge, teilweise als Erstlinientherapie und sehr häufig in Kombination mit verschiedenen systemischen immunsuppressiven Therapien. Das Verfahren besteht im Wesentlichen aus drei Schritten: Leukapherese, Photoaktivierung und Reinfusion. Im folgenden Artikel werden die noch nicht vollständig verstandenen Wirkmechanismen dargestellt, die fünf häufigsten Indikationen für die Behandlung mit ECP diskutiert und Therapieempfehlungen für die jeweilige Indikation gegeben.

Take a spin: Apheresis in the care of adult leukaemia patients

Apheresis is an automated process to separate the whole blood of a patient or a donor, collect or remove specific blood components, and return the remaining back to the individual. Apheresis is an integral part of blood and marrow transplantation and has been increasingly utilized in novel cellular therapies for a variety of blood disorders. This review uses clinical cases to highlight the multiple roles of apheresis in the care of adult leukaemia patients, including therapeutic leukapheresis in hyperleukocytosis, mobilized peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cell collection in donors, mononucleated cell collection in preparation of donor lymphocyte infusion or chimeric antigen receptor T cells manufacture, and extracorporeal photopheresis in the treatment of graft versus host diseases.

Extracorporeal photopheresis as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis: a randomized controlled trial: Prophylactic extracorporeal photopheresis to prevent graft-versus-host disease

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only curative option for many patients diagnosed with hematological malignancies. A major obstacle is graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) causing significant morbidity and mortality. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an increasingly applied GvHD treatment, partly due to its favourable safety profile. In contrast, the use of ECP in preventing GvHD is sparse, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

We therefore conducted a RCT to assess if ECP applied post-transplant, could prevent the development of GvHD within the first year of transplantation.

STUDY DESIGN

We enrolled 157 patients (18-74 years) with a hematological malignancy receiving first allo-HSCT: 76 randomized to the intervention group and 81 to the control group. ECP was initiated directly upon engraftment and was planned twice weekly for two weeks, then once weekly for four weeks. GvHD, relapse, and death were analyzed with Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

During the first year, 45 patients in the intervention and 52 control patients developed GvHD (HR=0.82, 95% CI 0.55-1.22, P=0.32). There were no differences in acute or chronic GvHD or its organ distribution in this intention-to-treat RCT. A per-protocol analysis revealed a significant difference in GvHD between the intervention (per-protocol; n=39 of 76) and the control group (n=77), 46% vs 68%, respectively, (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27-0.80, P=0.006). Relapse occurred in 15 patients in the intervention group and in 11 patients among the controls (HR=1.38, 95% CI 0.64-3.01, P=0.42). GvHD-free relapse-free (GRFS) survival, event-free survival, overall survival and non-relapse mortality did not differ significantly between the two study groups. No significant difference in immune reconstitution between the two study groups was revealed.

CONCLUSION

This first intention-to-treat RCT, investigating ECP as GvHD prophylaxis in allo-HSCT for hematological malignancy does not support the use of ECP as adjunct to standard drug-based GvHD-prophylaxis. This trial was registered at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov as #NCT03204721.

[Diagnosis, prophylaxis and therapeutic management of acute GVH: Guidelines from the SFGM-TC]

Acute GVHD is a potentially severe complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, responsible for morbidity and mortality that can affect the prognosis after transplantation. Within the framework of the 12th workshop of practice harmonization of the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC), diagnostic modalities of acute GVHD are updated. The conventional prevention (depending on donor, conditioning, and stem cell source) and treatment schemes (depending on affected organ and intensity) of aGVHD are clarified, and new therapeutic options are discussed.

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) improves overall survival in the treatment of steroid refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR aGvHD)

Steroid refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR aGvHD) is a major limitation of successful allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been used to treat SR aGvHD effectively and with low treatment related toxicity. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 103 Steroid Refractory aGvHD (SR aGvHD) patients to identify factors associated with improved outcomes including the use of ECP. A total of 79 patients received ECP as part of their SR aGVHD treatment compared to 24 patients who did not. Both groups had similar aGVHD grade and maximum organ stage at onset of aGVHD and treatment initiation. Patients in the group that received ECP had better OS (p = 0.01), DFS (p = 0.008), lower relapse (p = 0.05) and similar NRM compared to the group that did not receive ECP. Patients that received ECP treatment also had shorter hospital stays in the first 180 days after onset of SR aGvHD (20 vs. 38 days, p = 0.03). Multivariable analysis for OS indicated patient CMV status (CMV+ versus CMV-, HR 2.34, CI 1.16-4.69), regimen intensity (Myelo vs. non-Myeloablative, HR 0.39, CI 0.20-0.75), and the use of ECP (ECP vs. no ECP, HR 0.39, CI 0.20-0.75) were associated with OS. In summary, the use of ECP in the treatment of SR aGvHD results in improved overall survival secondary to lower relapse rates compared to other therapeutic modalities that do not incorporate ECP.

Extracorporeal photopheresis versus standard treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), occurring in 8% to 85% of paediatric recipients. Currently, the therapeutic mainstay for aGvHD is treatment with corticosteroids. However, there is no established standard treatment for steroid-refractory aGvHD. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a type of immunomodulatory method amongst different therapeutic options that involves ex vivo collection of peripheral mononuclear cells, exposure to the photoactive agent 8-methoxypsoralen and ultraviolet-A radiation, and reinfusion of these treated blood cells to the patient. The mechanisms of action of ECP are not completely understood. This is the second update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2014 and updated in 2015.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ECP for the management of aGvHD in children and adolescents after HSCT.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase (Ovid) databases from their inception to 25 January 2021. We searched the reference lists of potentially relevant studies without any language restrictions. We searched five conference proceedings and nine clinical trial registries on 9 November 2020 and 12 November 2020, respectively.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We sought to include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ECP with or without standard treatment versus standard treatment alone in children and adolescents with aGvHD after HSCT.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed the study selection. We resolved disagreement in the selection of trials by consultation with a third review author.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified no additional studies in the 2021 review update, so there are still no studies that meet the criteria for inclusion in this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of ECP in the treatment of aGvHD in children and adolescents after HSCT is unknown, and its use should be restricted to within the context of RCTs. Such studies should address a comparison of ECP alone or in combination with standard treatment versus standard treatment alone. The 2021 review update brought about no additions to these conclusions.

Efficacy of a 365 nm Ultraviolet A1 light Emitting Diode (UVA1-LED) in in vitro Extracorporeal Photopheresis

Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) is one of the more effective cell therapies for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). ECP is a widely recommended therapeutic approach for the treatment of chronic GvHD, particularly steroid-refractory GVHD. In recent years, the use of a light emitting diode (LED) in the clinic has attracted considerable interest. In this study, we examined the issue of whether an ultraviolet A1-light emitting diode (UVA1-LED) can be used as a light source in ECP. To compare the efficacy of ECP with conventional UVA lamp and a UVA1-LED, we established an in vitro ECP model. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by measuring the % apoptosis and the inhibition of T-cell proliferation. To investigate the effect of ECP on the innate immune reaction, THP-1 cells with a luciferase reporter gene driven by a NF-kB response element (THP-1 luc NF-kB) were treated with ECP. The LED-ECP induced apoptosis and inhibition of T-cell proliferation as efficiently as a conventional ECP. However, LED-ECP induced less innate immunity in THP-1. Since LED devices are more compact compared with conventional UVA irradiation devices, the use of a UVA1-LED in the treatment of ECP may be a better alternative to conventional ECP therapy.

Current advances in transfusion medicine 2021: A critical review of selected topics by the AABB Clinical Transfusion Medicine Committee

BACKGROUND

Each year the AABB Clinical Transfusion Medicine Committee (CTMC) procures a synopsis highlighting new, important, and clinically relevant studies in the field of transfusion medicine (TM). This has been made available as a publication in Transfusion since 2018.

METHODS

CTMC members reviewed and identified original manuscripts covering TM-related topics published electronically (ahead-of-print) or in print from December 2020 to December 2021. Selection of publications was discussed at committee meetings and chosen based on perceived relevance and originality. Next, committee members worked in pairs to create a synopsis of each topic, which was then reviewed by additional committee members. The first and senior authors assembled the final manuscript. Although this synopsis is extensive, it is not exhaustive, and some articles may have been excluded or missed.

RESULTS

The following topics are included: blood products; convalescent plasma; donor collections and testing; hemoglobinopathies; immunohematology and genomics; hemostasis; patient blood management; pediatrics; therapeutic apheresis; and cell therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This synopsis highlights and summarizes recent key developments in TM and may be useful for educational purposes.

Differential diagnosis and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis: A comprehensive review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a new class of cancer pharmacotherapy consisting of antibodies that block inhibitory immune regulators such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4, programmed cell death 1 and programmed death-ligand 1. Checkpoint blockade by ICIs reactivates a tumor-specific T cell response. Immune-related adverse events can occur in various organs including skin, liver, and gastrointestinal tract. Mild to severe colitis is the most common side effect with some experiencing rapid progression to more serious complications including bowel perforation and even death. Prompt diagnosis and management of ICI-induced colitis is crucial for optimal outcome. Unfortunately, its clinical, endoscopic and histopathologic presentations are non-specific and overlap with those of colitis caused by other etiologies, such as infection, medication, graft-versus-host disease and inflammatory bowel disease. Thus, a definitive diagnosis can only be rendered after these other possible etiologies are excluded. Sometimes an extensive clinical, laboratory and radiologic workup is required, making it challenging to arrive at a prompt diagnosis. Most patients experience full resolution of symptoms with corticosteroids and/or infliximab. For ICI-induced colitis that is treatment-refractory, small scale studies offer alternative strategies, such as vedolizumab and fecal microbiota transplantation. In this review, we focus on the clinical features, differential diagnosis, and management of ICI-induced colitis with special attention to emerging treatment options for treatment-refractory ICI-induced colitis.

Response to extracorporeal photopheresis therapy of patients with steroid-refractory/-resistant GvHD is associated with up-regulation of Th22 cells and Tfh cells

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), a personalized cellular immunotherapy, constitutes a promising treatment for steroid-refractory/-resistant graft-versus-host disease (SR-GvHD), with encouraging clinical response rates. To further investigate its mechanism of action, ECP's effects on T helper (Th) cells as well as on expression of immune checkpoint (PD-1 and Tim-3) and apoptotic (Fas receptor [FasR]) molecules were investigated in 27 patients with SR-GvHD. Our data show that GvHD patients had significantly higher levels of Th2, Th17, Th22 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-positive Th (ThG) cells and clearly lower levels of T follicular helper (Tfh) cells, including Th1- and Th2-like cells, compared with healthy donors. ECP therapy for GvHD was effective through the modulation of different Th subsets: increases of Th22 (1.52-fold) and Tfh cells (1.48-fold) in acute GvHD (aGvHD) and increases of Th2-like Tfh cells (1.74-fold) in chronic GvHD (cGvHD) patients were associated with clinical response. Expression of FasR was further upregulated in CD4⁺CD8⁺ T cells. Additionally, Tim-3-expressing effector T cells associated with the severity of GvHD were reduced. Taken together, these data show that ECP therapy exerts immunomodulatory effects by promoting a balanced immune reconstitution and inducing immune tolerance. Therefore it represents an attractive option for the treatment of GvHD.