Cancers after HLA-matched related bone marrow transplantation for aplastic anemia

Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric acquired aplastic anemia

Acquired aplastic anemia (AA) in children is a rare bone marrow failure that requires several special considerations for its diagnosis and treatment compared with that in adults. The most common issue is the differential diagnosis with refractory cytopenia of childhood and inherited bone marrow failure syndromes, which is crucial for making decisions on the appropriate treatment for pediatric AA. In addition to detailed morphological evaluation, a comprehensive diagnostic work-up that includes genetic analysis using next-generation sequencing will play an increasingly important role in identifying the underlying etiology of pediatric AA. When discussing treatment strategies for children with acquired AA, the long-term sequelae and level of hematopoietic recovery that affect daily or school life should also be considered, although the overall survival rate has reached 90% after immunosuppressive therapy or hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Recent advances in HCT for pediatric patients with acquired AA have been remarkable, with the successful use of upfront bone marrow transplantation from a matched unrelated donor, unrelated cord blood transplantation or haploidentical HCT as salvage treatment, and fludarabine/melphalan-based conditioning regimens. This review discusses current clinical practices in the diagnosis and treatment of acquired AA in children based on the latest data.

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for aplastic anemia

After more than 60 years of intense research in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), this therapy has progressed from one that was fraught with seemingly insurmountable complications to a standard treatment of patients with aplastic anemia. During the 1970s and 1980s, HCT donors were almost exclusively HLA-identical siblings. Subsequent advances in the understanding of the complexity of the HLA region along with the development of molecular HLA typing and the establishment of unrelated volunteer donor registries have resulted in an ever-increasing use of such donors. Most recent breakthroughs have enabled HLA-haploidentical HCT and, thereby, finding donors for nearly every patient. The outstanding outcomes reported with any of the donor options have made allogeneic HCT the preferred treatment over immunosuppressive therapy.

Graft-versus-host disease and relapse/rejection-free survival after allogeneic transplantation for idiopathic severe aplastic anemia: a comprehensive analysis from the SAAWP of the EBMT

Survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for severe idiopathic aplastic anemia (SAA) has improved in recent years, approaching 75% at 5 years. However, an SAA-adapted composite endpoint, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and relapse/rejection-free survival (GRFS), may more accurately assess patient outcomes beyond survival. We analyzed GRFS to identify risk factors and specific causes of GRFS failure. Our retrospective analysis from the Severe Aplastic Anemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation included 479 patients with idiopathic SAA who underwent allo-HSCT in two conventional situations: i) upfront allo-HSCT from a matched related donor (MRD) (upfront cohort), and ii) allo-HSCT for relapsed or refractory SAA (rel/ref cohort). Relevant events for GRFS calculation included graft failure, grade 3-4 acute GvHD, extensive chronic GvHD, and death. In the upfront cohort (n=209), 5-year GRFS was 77%. Late allo-HSCT (i.e., >6 months after SAA diagnosis) was the main poor prognostic factor, specifically increasing the risk of death as the cause of GRFS failure (hazard ratio [HR]=4.08; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-11.83; P=0.010). In the rel/ref cohort (n=270), 5-year GRFS was 61%. Age was the main factor significantly increasing the risk of death (HR=1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.06; P<0.001), acute GvHD (HR=1.03; 95% CI: 1.00-1.07; P=0.041), and chronic GvHD (HR=1.04; 95% CI: 1.01-1.08; P=0.032) as the cause of GRFS failure. GRFS after upfront MRD allo-HSCT was very good, notably with early allo-HSCT, confirming that younger patients with an MRD should be transplanted immediately. GRFS was worse in cases of salvage allo-HSCT, most notably in older patients, questioning the utility of allo-HSCT earlier in the disease course.