1
|
Neuendorff NR, Khan A, Ullrich F, Yates S, Devarakonda S, Lin RJ, von Tresckow B, Cordoba R, Artz A, Rosko AE. Cellular therapies in older adults with hematological malignancies: A case-based, state-of-the-art review. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101734. [PMID: 38430810 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
Cellular therapies, including autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), and chimeric antigen receptor- (CAR-) T cell therapies are essential treatment modalities for many hematological malignancies. Although their use in older adults has substantially increased within the past decades, cellular therapies represent intensive treatment approaches that exclude a large percentage of older adults due to comorbidities and frailty. Under- and overtreatment in older adults with hematologic malignancy is a challenge and many treatment decisions are influenced by chronologic age. The advent of efficient and well-tolerated newer treatment approaches for multiple myeloma has challenged the role of ASCT. In the modern era, there are no randomized clinical trials of transplant versus non-transplant strategies for patients ≥65 years. Nonetheless, ASCT is feasible for selected older patients and does not result in long-term compromise in quality of life. AlloHCT is the only curative approach for acute myeloid leukemia of intermediate and unfavourable risk but carries a significant risk for non-relapse mortality depending on comorbidities, general fitness, and transplant-specific characteristics, such as intensity of conditioning and donor choice. However, alloHCT is feasible in appropriately-selected older adults. Early referral for evaluation is strongly encouraged as this is the most obvious barrier. CAR-T cell therapies have shown unprecedented clinical efficacy and durability in relapsed and refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Its use is well tolerated in older adults, although evidence comes from limited case numbers. Whether patients who are deemed unfit for ASCT qualify for CAR-T cell therapy remains elusive, but the tolerability and efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy appears promising, especially for older patients. The evidence from randomized trials is strong in favor of using a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to reduce treatment-related toxicities and guide treatment intensity in the care for solid tumors; its use for evaluation of cellular therapies is less evidence-based. However, CGA can provide useful information on patients' fitness, resilient mechanisms, and reveal potential optimization strategies for compensating for vulnerabilities. In this narrative review, we will discuss key questions on cellular therapies in older adults based on illustrative patient cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Rosa Neuendorff
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45147 Essen, Germany.
| | - Abdullah Khan
- Department of Hematology, The Ohio State University, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Fabian Ullrich
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Samuel Yates
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Srinivas Devarakonda
- Department of Hematology, The Ohio State University, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Richard J Lin
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation (BMT) Service, Cellular Therapy Service, Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Bastian von Tresckow
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Raul Cordoba
- Lymphoma Unit, Department of Hematology, Health Research Institute IIS-FJD, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrew Artz
- Division of Leukemia, Department of Hematology & Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Ashley E Rosko
- Department of Hematology, The Ohio State University, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lin RJ, Dahi PB, Korc-Grodzicki B, Shahrokni A, Jakubowski AA, Giralt SA. Transplantation and Cellular Therapy for Older Adults-The MSK Approach. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2024; 19:82-91. [PMID: 38332462 PMCID: PMC11126330 DOI: 10.1007/s11899-024-00725-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Hematologic malignances more commonly affect older individuals and often present with advanced, higher risk disease than younger patients. Allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation is well-established treatment modalities with curative potential following either frontline treatments for these diseases or salvage therapy in the relapsed or refractory setting. More recently, novel cellular immunotherapy such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has been shown to lead to high response rate and durable remission in many patients with advanced blood cancers. RECENT FINDINGS Given unique characteristics of older patients, how best to deliver these higher-intensity and time sensitive treatment modalities for them remains challenging. Moreover, their short-term and potential long-term impact on their functional status, cognitive status, and quality of life may be significant considerations for many older patients. All these issues contributed to the lack of access and significant underutilization of these potential curative treatment strategies. In this review, we present up to date evidence to support potential benefits of transplantation and cellular therapy for older adults, their steady improving outcomes, and most importantly, highlight the use of geriatric assessment to help select appropriate older patients and optimize them prior to and following transplantation and cellular therapy. We specifically describe our approach at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and encouraging early results from its implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Lin
- Adult Blood and Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
- David H. Koch Center for Cancer Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 530 E 74th Street, Room 21-142, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
| | - Parastoo B Dahi
- Adult Blood and Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki
- Geriatrics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Armin Shahrokni
- Geriatrics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Ann A Jakubowski
- Adult Blood and Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Sergio A Giralt
- Adult Blood and Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Spyridonidis A, Labopin M, Gedde-Dahl T, Ganser A, Stelljes M, Craddock C, Wagner-Drouet EM, Versluis J, Schroeder T, Blau IW, Wulf GG, Dreger P, Olesen G, Sengeloev H, Kröger N, Potter V, Forcade E, Passweg J, de Latour RP, Maertens J, Wilson KMO, Bourhis JH, Finke J, Brissot E, Bazarbachi A, Giebel S, Savani BP, Nagler A, Ciceri F, Mohty M. Validation of the transplant conditioning intensity (TCI) index for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2024; 59:217-223. [PMID: 37978322 PMCID: PMC10849946 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-023-02139-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
The intensity of the conditioning regimen given before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) can vary substantially. To confirm the ability of the recently developed transplant conditioning intensity (TCI) score to stratify the preparative regimens of allo-HCT, we used an independent and contemporary patient cohort of 4060 transplant recipients with acute myeloid leukemia meeting inclusion criteria from the discovery study (allo-HCT in first complete remission, matched donor), but who were allografted in a more recent period (2018-2021) and were one decade older (55-75 years, median 63.4 years), we assigned them to a TCI category (low n = 1934, 48%; intermediate n = 1948, 48%, high n = 178, 4%) according to the calculated TCI score ([1-2], [2.5-3.5], [4-6], respectively), and examined the validity of the TCI category in predicting early non-relapse mortality (NRM), 2-year NRM and relapse (REL). In the unadjusted comparison, the TCI index provided a significant risk stratification for d100 and d180 NRM, NRM and REL risk. In the multivariate analysis adjusted for significant variables, there was an independent association of TCI with early NRM, NRM and REL. In summary, we confirm in contemporary treated patients that TCI reflects the conditioning regimen related morbidity and anti-leukemic efficacy satisfactorily and across other established prognostic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandros Spyridonidis
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit and Institute of Cellular Therapy, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
| | - Myriam Labopin
- EBMT Unit, Sorbonne University, Saint-Antoine Hospital, AP-HP, INSERM UMRs 938, Paris, France
| | - Tobias Gedde-Dahl
- Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Hematology Dept. Section for Stem Cell Transplantation, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arnold Ganser
- Hannover Medical School, Department of Haematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Charles Craddock
- University Hospital Birmingham NHSTrust, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Edgbaston, Dept. of Haematology, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Eva Maria Wagner-Drouet
- University Medical Center Mainz, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jurjen Versluis
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Hematology, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Thomas Schroeder
- University Hospital Essen, Dept. of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Essen, Germany
| | - Igor Wolfgang Blau
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gerald G Wulf
- Universitaetsklinikum Goettingen, Abteilung Hämatologie und Onkologie, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Peter Dreger
- University of Heidelberg, Medizinische Klinik u. Poliklinik V, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Henrik Sengeloev
- National University Hospital, Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nicolaus Kröger
- University Hospital Eppendorf, Bone Marrow Transplantation Centre, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Victoria Potter
- Kings College Hospital, Dept. of Haematological Medicine, King's Denmark Hill Campus, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jakob Passweg
- University Hospital Basel, Dept of Hematology, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Johan Maertens
- University Hospital Gasthuisberg Dept. of Hematology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Keith M O Wilson
- University Hospital of Wales, Department of Haematology, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Jean Henri Bourhis
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Department of Hematology, Villejuif, France
| | - Juergen Finke
- University of Freiburg, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Eolia Brissot
- Hospital Saint Antoine, Department of Hematology, Paris, France
| | - Ali Bazarbachi
- American University of Beirut-Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine-Bone Marrow Transplantation Program, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Sebastian Giebel
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Department of Hematology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Bipin P Savani
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Hematology, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Arnon Nagler
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Department of Hematology, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Fabio Ciceri
- Hematology Division, Ospedale San Raffaele s.r.l., Haematology and BMT, Milano, Italy
| | - Mohamad Mohty
- EBMT Unit, Sorbonne University, Saint-Antoine Hospital, AP-HP, INSERM UMRs 938, Paris, France
- Hospital Saint Antoine, Department of Hematology, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weise G, Massoud R, Krause R, Heidenreich S, Janson D, Klyuchnikov E, Wolschke C, Zeck G, Kröger N, Ayuk F. Development and Validation of a Concise Objectifiable Risk Evaluation Score for Non-Relapse Mortality after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:515. [PMID: 38339266 PMCID: PMC10854706 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
We aimed to develop a concise objectifiable risk evaluation (CORE) tool for predicting non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). A total of 1120 adult patients who had undergone allo-HCT at our center between 2013 and 2020 were divided into training, first, and second validation cohorts. Objectifiable, patient-related factors impacting NRM in univariate and multivariate analyses were: serum albumin, serum creatinine, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), heart function (LVEF), lung function (VC, FEV1), and patient age. Hazard ratios were assigned points (0-3) based on their impact on NRM and summed to the individual CORE HCT score. The CORE HCT score stratified patients into three distinct low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with two-year NRM rates of 9%, 22%, and 46%, respectively, and OS rates of 73%, 55%, and 35%, respectively (p < 0.001). These findings were confirmed in a first and a second recently treated validation cohort. Importantly, the CORE HCT score remained informative across various conditioning intensities, disease-specific subgroups, and donor types, but did not impact relapse incidence. A comparison of CORE HCT vs. HCT Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) in the second validation cohort revealed better performance of the CORE HCT score with c-statistics for NRM and OS of 0.666 (SE 0.05, p = 0.001) and 0.675 (SE 0.039, p < 0.001) vs. 0.431 (SE 0.057, p = 0.223) and 0.535 (SE 0.042, p = 0.411), respectively. The CORE HCT score is a concise and objectifiable risk evaluation tool for adult patients undergoing allo-HCT for malignant disease. External multicenter validation is underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Francis Ayuk
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (G.W.); (R.M.); (R.K.); (S.H.); (D.J.); (E.K.); (C.W.); (G.Z.); (N.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gómez-De León A, Demichelis-Gómez R, da Costa-Neto A, Gómez-Almaguer D, Rego EM. Acute myeloid leukemia: challenges for diagnosis and treatment in Latin America. HEMATOLOGY (AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS) 2023; 28:2158015. [PMID: 36607152 DOI: 10.1080/16078454.2022.2158015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to review the current diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of AML in Latin America as a reflection of other low- and middle-income countries and regions of the world. Encompassing both acute promyelocytic and non-promyelocytic disease types. METHODS We reviewed the literature and study registries concerning epidemiological features of patients with AML/APL treated in Latin America, as well as evaluated diagnostic and genetic stratification and patient fitness assessment challenges, the importance of early mortality and supportive care capacity, intensive and non-intensive chemotherapy alternatives, consolidation, and maintenance strategies including novel agents and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. RESULTS Although most of the current technologies and treatment options are available in the region, a significant fraction of patients have only limited access to them. In addition, mortality in the first weeks from diagnosis is higher in the region compared to developed countries. CONCLUSIONS Disparities in access to technologies, supportive care capacity, and availability of novel agents and HSCT hinder results in our region, reflecting barriers common to other LMICs. Recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease must be implemented through education, collaborative clinical research, and advocacy to improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrés Gómez-De León
- Facultad de Medicina y Hospital Universitario "Dr. José Eleuterio González", Universiadad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Roberta Demichelis-Gómez
- Department of Hematology, Instituto Nacional de Cinecias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Abel da Costa-Neto
- Department of Hematology, D'or Institute for Research and Education, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - David Gómez-Almaguer
- Facultad de Medicina y Hospital Universitario "Dr. José Eleuterio González", Universiadad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Mexico
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Akahoshi Y, Tada Y, Sakaida E, Kusuda M, Doki N, Uchida N, Fukuda T, Tanaka M, Sawa M, Katayama Y, Matsuoka KI, Ozawa Y, Onizuka M, Kanda J, Kanda Y, Atsuta Y, Nakasone H. Novel risk assessment for the intensity of conditioning regimen in older patients. Blood Adv 2023; 7:4738-4747. [PMID: 36508283 PMCID: PMC10468368 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens have long-term outcomes that are generally comparable with those of myeloablative conditioning (MAC) because of a lower risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) but a higher risk of relapse. However, it is unclear how we should select the conditioning intensity in individual cases. We propose the risk assessment for the intensity of conditioning regimen in elderly patients (RICE) score. We retrospectively analyzed 6147 recipients aged 50 to 69 years using a Japanese registry database. Based on the interaction analyses, advanced age (≥60 years), hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (≥2), and umbilical cord blood were used to design a scoring system to predict the difference in an individual patient's risk of NRM between MAC and RIC: the RICE score, which is the sum of the 3 factors. Zero or 1 implies low RICE score and 2 or 3, high RICE score. In multivariate analyses, RIC was significantly associated with a decreased risk of NRM in patients with a high RICE score (training cohort: hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.90; P = .003; validation cohort: HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.43-0.77; P < .001). In contrast, we found no significant differences in NRM between MAC and RIC in patients with a low RICE score (training cohort: HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.85-1.15; P = .860; validation cohort: HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66-1.01; P = .061). In summary, a new and simple scoring system, the RICE score, appears to be useful for personalizing the conditioning intensity and could improve transplant outcomes in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Akahoshi
- Division of Hematology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
- The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Yuma Tada
- Department of Hematology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Emiko Sakaida
- Department of Hematology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Machiko Kusuda
- Division of Hematology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Noriko Doki
- Hematology Division, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Uchida
- Department of Hematology, Federation of National Public Service Personnel Mutual Aid Associations Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Fukuda
- Division of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masatsugu Tanaka
- Department of Hematology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masashi Sawa
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Anjo Kosei Hospital, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yuta Katayama
- Department of Hematology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic Bomb Survivors Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Ken-ichi Matsuoka
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yukiyasu Ozawa
- Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya First Hospital, Aichi, Japan
| | - Makoto Onizuka
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Junya Kanda
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshinobu Kanda
- Division of Hematology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Yoshiko Atsuta
- Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Aichi, Japan
- Department of Registry Science for Transplant and Cellular Therapy, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hideki Nakasone
- Division of Hematology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bazinet A, Kantarjian H, Arani N, Popat U, Bataller A, Sasaki K, DiNardo CD, Daver N, Yilmaz M, Abbas HA, Short NJ, Issa G, Jabbour E, Pierce SA, Chen J, Garcia R, Konopleva M, Garcia-Manero G, Alousi A, Shpall EJ, Champlin RE, Borthakur G, Ravandi F, Kadia T. Evolving trends and outcomes in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia including allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Am J Hematol 2023; 98:1383-1393. [PMID: 37334870 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
Outcomes in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have historically been poor. Given advances in low-intensity therapy (LIT) and stem cell transplantation (SCT), we performed a retrospective single-center study to evaluate the contemporary outcomes of this population. We reviewed all patients ≥60 years with newly diagnosed AML between 2012 and 2021 and analyzed treatment and SCT-related trends and outcomes. We identified 1073 patients with a median age of 71 years. Adverse clinical and cytomolecular findings were frequent within this cohort. In total, 16% of patients were treated with intensive chemotherapy, 51% with LIT alone, and 32% with LIT plus venetoclax. The composite complete remission rate with LIT plus venetoclax was 72%, which was higher than with LIT alone (48%, p < .0001) and comparable to intensive chemotherapy (74%, p = .6). The median overall survival (OS) with intensive chemotherapy, LIT, and LIT plus venetoclax was 20.1, 8.9, and 12.1 months, respectively. 18% of patients received SCT. SCT rates were 37%, 10%, and 22% in patients treated with intensive chemotherapy, LIT, and LIT plus venetoclax, respectively. The 2-year OS, relapse-free survival (RFS), cumulative incidence (CI) of relapse, and CI of treatment-related mortality with frontline SCT (n = 139) were 59%, 52%, 27%, and 22%, respectively. By landmark analysis, patients undergoing frontline SCT had superior OS (median 39.6 vs. 21.4 months, p < .0001) and RFS (30.9 vs. 12.1 months, p < .0001) compared with responding patients who did not. Outcomes in older patients with AML are improving with more effective LIT. Measures should be pursued to increase access to SCT in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Bazinet
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Hagop Kantarjian
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Naszrin Arani
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Uday Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alex Bataller
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Koji Sasaki
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Courtney D DiNardo
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Naval Daver
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Musa Yilmaz
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Hussein A Abbas
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nicholas J Short
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ghayas Issa
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Elias Jabbour
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sherry A Pierce
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Julianne Chen
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ricky Garcia
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marina Konopleva
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Guillermo Garcia-Manero
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amin Alousi
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Elizabeth J Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Gautam Borthakur
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Farhad Ravandi
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Tapan Kadia
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jeng MY, Kong D, Rajalingam R, Lin RJ, Olin RL. Lack of disease control remains a major barrier to transplant for older patients with AML. Bone Marrow Transplant 2023; 58:1054-1056. [PMID: 37353571 PMCID: PMC11022831 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-023-02022-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Y Jeng
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Denice Kong
- Immunogenetics and Transplantation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Raja Rajalingam
- Immunogenetics and Transplantation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Richard J Lin
- Department of Medicine, Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rebecca L Olin
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tomlinson B, de Lima M, Cogle CR, Thompson MA, Grinblatt DL, Pollyea DA, Komrokji RS, Roboz GJ, Savona MR, Sekeres MA, Abedi M, Garcia-Manero G, Kurtin SE, Maciejewski JP, Patel JL, Revicki DA, George TI, Flick ED, Kiselev P, Louis CU, DeGutis IS, Nifenecker M, Erba HP, Steensma DP, Scott BL. Transplantation Referral Patterns for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia at Academic and Community Sites in the Connect® Myeloid Disease Registry: Potential Barriers to Care. Transplant Cell Ther 2023; 29:460.e1-460.e9. [PMID: 37086851 PMCID: PMC11104018 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023]
Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is indicated for patients with higher-risk (HR) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Age, performance status, patient frailty, comorbidities, and nonclinical factors (eg, cost, distance to site) are all recognized as important clinical factors that can influence HCT referral patterns and patient outcomes; however, the proportion of eligible patients referred for HCT in routine clinical practice is largely unknown. This study aimed to assess patterns of consideration for HCT among patients with HR-MDS and AML enrolled in the Connect® Myeloid Disease Registry at community/government (CO/GOV)- or academic (AC)-based sites, as well as to identify factors associated with rates of transplantation referral. We assessed patterns of consideration for and completion of HCT in patients with HR-MDS and AML enrolled between December 12, 2013, and March 6, 2020, in the Connect Myeloid Disease Registry at 164 CO/GOV and AC sites. Registry sites recorded whether patients were considered for transplantation at baseline and at each follow-up visit. The following answers were possible: "considered potentially eligible," "not considered potentially eligible," or "not assessed." Sites also recorded whether patients subsequently underwent HCT at each follow-up visit. Rates of consideration for HCT between CO/GOV and AC sites were compared using multivariable logistic regression analysis with covariates for age and comorbidity. Among the 778 patients with HR-MDS or AML enrolled in the Connect Myeloid Disease Registry, patients at CO/GOV sites were less likely to be considered potentially eligible for HCT than patients at AC sites (27.9% versus 43.9%; P < .0001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis with factors for age (<65 versus ≥65 years) and ACE-27 comorbidity grade (<2 versus ≥2) showed that patients at CO/GOV sites were significantly less likely than those at AC sites to be considered potentially eligible for HCT (odds ratio, 1.6, 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.4; P = .0155). Among patients considered eligible for HCT, 45.1% (65 of 144) of those at CO/GOV sites and 35.7% (41 of 115) of those at AC sites underwent transplantation (P = .12). Approximately one-half of all patients at CO/GOV (50.1%) and AC (45.4%) sites were not considered potentially eligible for HCT; the most common reasons were age at CO/GOV sites (71.5%) and comorbidities at AC sites (52.1%). Across all sites, 17.4% of patients were reported as not assessed (and thus not considered) for HCT by their treating physician (20.7% at CO/GOV sites and 10.7% at AC sites; P = .0005). These findings suggest that many patients with HR-MDS and AML who may be candidates for HCT are not receiving assessment or consideration for transplantation in clinical practice. In addition, treatment at CO/GOV sites and age remain significant barriers to ensuring that all potentially eligible patients are assessed for HCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Tomlinson
- Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
| | - Marcos de Lima
- Department of Hematology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Christopher R Cogle
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | | | - David L Grinblatt
- NorthShore Medical Group, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois
| | | | - Rami S Komrokji
- Department of Malignant Hematology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Gail J Roboz
- Weill Cornell College of Medicine and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Michael R Savona
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Mikkael A Sekeres
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Mehrdad Abedi
- University of California Davis, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California
| | | | | | | | - Jay L Patel
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah and ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Tracy I George
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah and ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Bart L Scott
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fein JA, Shouval R, Galimard JE, Labopin M, Socié G, Finke J, Cornelissen JJ, Malladi R, Itälä-Remes M, Chevallier P, Orchard KH, Bunjes D, Aljurf M, Rubio MT, Versluis J, Mohty M, Nagler A. Comorbidities in transplant recipients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving low-intensity conditioning regimens: an ALWP EBMT study. Blood Adv 2023; 7:2143-2152. [PMID: 36622338 PMCID: PMC10206431 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Older age and a high burden of comorbidities often drive the selection of low-intensity conditioning regimens in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. However, the impact of comorbidities in the low-intensity conditioning setting is unclear. We sought to determine the contribution of individual comorbidities and their cumulative burden on the risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) among patients receiving low-intensity regimens. In a retrospective analysis of adults (≥18 years) who underwent transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in the first complete remission between 2008 and 2018, we studied recipients of low-intensity regimens as defined by the transplantation conditioning intensity (TCI) scale. Multivariable Cox models were constructed to study associations of comorbidities with NRM. Comorbidities identified as putative risk factors in the low-TCI setting were included in combined multivariable regression models assessed for overall survival, NRM, and relapse. A total of 1663 patients with a median age of 61 years received low-TCI regimens. Cardiac comorbidity (including arrhythmia/valvular disease) and psychiatric disease were associated with increased NRM risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.09 and HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.02-2.82, respectively). Moderate pulmonary dysfunction, though prevalent, was not associated with increased NRM. In a combined model, cardiac, psychiatric, renal, and inflammatory bowel diseases were independently associated with adverse transplantation outcomes. These findings may inform patient and regimen selection and reinforce the need for further investigation of cardioprotective transplantation approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua A. Fein
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY
| | - Roni Shouval
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Jacques-Emmanuel Galimard
- Hematology Department, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
- Clinical Hematology and Cellular Therapy Department, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR 938, Paris, France
- European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Statistical Unit, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Myriam Labopin
- Hematology Department, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
- Clinical Hematology and Cellular Therapy Department, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR 938, Paris, France
| | - Gérard Socié
- Hematology and Transplantation Unit, Hôpital Saint Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Jürgen Finke
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jan J. Cornelissen
- Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ram Malladi
- Centre for Clinical Haematology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Maija Itälä-Remes
- Department of Clinical Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant Unit, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | | | - Kim H. Orchard
- Wessex Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Donald Bunjes
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Mahmoud Aljurf
- Oncology Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudia Arabia
| | - Marie Thérèse Rubio
- Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Hôpitaux de Brabois, Nancy, France
| | - Jurjen Versluis
- Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mohamad Mohty
- Hematology Department, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
- Clinical Hematology and Cellular Therapy Department, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR 938, Paris, France
| | - Arnon Nagler
- Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Division, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lai C, Bhansali RS, Kuo EJ, Mannis G, Lin RJ. Older Adults With Newly Diagnosed AML: Hot Topics for the Practicing Clinician. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2023; 43:e390018. [PMID: 37155946 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_390018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Over the past decade, our understanding of AML pathogenesis and pathophysiology has improved significantly with mutational profiling. This has led to translational advances in therapeutic options, as there have been 10 new US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals for AML therapies since 2017, half of which target specific driver mutations in FLT3, IDH1, or IDH2. These new agents have expanded the therapeutic armamentarium for AML, particularly for patients who are considered ineligible for intensive chemotherapy with anthracycline- and cytarabine-containing regimens. These new treatment options are relevant because the median age at diagnosis is 68 years, and outcomes for patients older than 60 years have historically been dismal. However, the optimal approach to incorporating novel agents into frontline regimens remains a clinical challenge, particularly with regard to sequencing of therapies, considering the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and managing toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Lai
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Rahul S Bhansali
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Eric J Kuo
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Gabriel Mannis
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Richard J Lin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Determinants of refined GvHD-free, relapse-free survival after reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in older patients with myeloid malignancies. Leuk Res 2023; 127:107052. [PMID: 36857875 DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2023.107052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older patients with AML/MDS have a poor prognosis with alloHCT as the only curative option. However alloHCT is challenging given its high TRM. Recently, a composite endpoint of GRFS was proposed to define transplant success. A single centre retrospective analysis was performed to determine the main variables influencing GRFS. PATIENTS AND METHODSMETHODS 91 consecutive patients≥ 60 years (median 64 years, range 60-74) with AML/MDS who received reduced-intensity alloHCT during 2001-2017 analysed. Disease risk index (DRI) at HCT was low/intermediate in 47pts (52%) and high in 44 pts (48%). RESULTS After median follow-up for survivors of 56 months (range 7-144), 37 (40.6%) patients were alive. The OS, LFS and GRFS were 61.4%, 58.1%, 49.1% at 1 year and 35.5%, 32.3% and 23.1% at 5 years, respectively. The 1-year and 5-year incidences of NRM and relapse were 26.9%, 21.3% and 47.9% and 35.4%, respectively. In univariate analysis, high DRI was the strongest factor for worse OS (HR 2.121; p = 0.049), LFS (HR 1.924; p = 0.0123) and GRFS (HR 2.319; p = 0.0005). The donor age ≥ 62 years had a negative impact on OS (HR 2.110; p = 0.0345) and GRFS (HR 2.014; p = 0.0341). High DRI (HR 2.652; p = 0.0003) and donor age (HR 2.304; p = 0.0257) retained its significance in multivariate analysis for GRFS. CONCLUSION A significant portion of older patients with myeloid malignancies survive alloHCT without experiencing GRFS event with DRI as the main determinant of outcome. Negative impact of donor age≥ 62 years suggests preference of a young donor, regardless of being related or unrelated.
Collapse
|
13
|
Comparison of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with chemotherapy in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant 2023; 58:491-497. [PMID: 36697924 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-023-01925-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) outcomes are very poor in older patients. Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) helps to achieve long-term survival. However, the benefit of haplo-SCT versus chemotherapy is unclear in older adults with AML. Outcomes were retrospectively compared among patients aged 55‒65 years for chemotherapy consolidation or haplo-SCT for AML in the first complete remission with intermediate to high-risk disease. Forty-six patients who underwent chemotherapy and 38 patients who underwent haplo-SCT were evaluated in the final analysis. Compared with the chemotherapy group, patients in the haplo-SCT group had significantly better overall survival (OS) (74.0% versus 23.9% at 36 months, p = 0.005) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) (74.0% versus 21.6%, p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was significantly lower in the haplo-SCT group (17.3% versus 75.4%, p < 0.001). Treatment-related mortality (TRM) was similar in the haplo-SCT and chemotherapy groups (7.9% versus 4.8%, p = 0.587). In the multivariate analysis, haplo-SCT was associated with improved OS, LFS, and decreased CIR. Haplo-SCT did not affect TRM. In conclusion, our data suggest that haploidentical transplant may be an alternative to consolidation chemotherapy as post-remission therapy in patients with intermediate or high-risk AML aged 55‒65 years. Further well-designed studies are needed to validate this result.
Collapse
|
14
|
Senapati J, Jabbour E, Kantarjian H, Short NJ. Pathogenesis and management of accelerated and blast phases of chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2023; 37:5-17. [PMID: 36309558 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-022-01736-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been a model for cancer therapy development. Though most patients with CML have a normal quality and duration of life with TKI therapy, some patients progress to accelerated phase (AP) and blast phase (BP), both of which have a relatively poor prognosis. The rates of progression have reduced significantly from over >20% in the pre-TKI era to <5% now, largely due to refinements in CML therapy and response monitoring. Significant insights have been gained into the mechanisms of disease transformation including the role of additional cytogenetic abnormalities, somatic mutations, and other genomic alterations present at diagnosis or evolving on therapy. This knowledge is helping to optimize TKI therapy, improve prognostication and inform the development of novel combination regimens in these patients. While patients with de novo CML-AP have outcomes almost similar to CML in chronic phase (CP), those transformed from previously treated CML-CP should receive second- or third- generation TKIs and be strongly considered for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Similarly, patients with transformed CML-BP have particularly dismal outcomes with a median survival usually less than one year. Combination regimens with a potent TKI such as ponatinib followed by allo-SCT can achieve long-term survival in some transformed BP patients. Regimens including venetoclax in myeloid BP or inotuzumab ozogamicin or blinatumomab in lymphoid BP might lead to deeper and longer responses, facilitating potentially curative allo-SCT for patients with CML-BP once CP is achieved. Newer agents and novel combination therapies are further expanding the therapeutic arsenal in advanced phase CML.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayastu Senapati
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elias Jabbour
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hagop Kantarjian
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nicholas J Short
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jiang S, Yan H, Lu X, Wei R, Chen H, Zhang A, Shi W, Xia L. How to improve the outcomes of elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients through allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1102966. [PMID: 37207218 PMCID: PMC10189056 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1102966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, with the gradual advancement of haploidentical transplantation technology, the availability of donors has increased significantly, along with the widespread use of reduced-intensity conditioning and the improvement of nursing techniques, giving more elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients the chance to receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We have summarized the classic and recently proposed pre-transplant assessment methods and assessed the various sources of donors, conditioning regimens, and post-transplant complication management based on the outcomes of large-scale clinical studies for elderly AML patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Wei Shi
- *Correspondence: Linghui Xia, ; Wei Shi,
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lin RJ. Allogeneic Transplantation for Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: The Dawn of a New Era. Transplant Cell Ther 2022; 28:793-794. [PMID: 36470612 PMCID: PMC9827512 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
|
17
|
Sahasrabudhe K, Huang Y, Rebechi M, Elder P, Mims A, Wall S. Survival, response rates, and post-transplant outcomes in patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia aged 60-75 treated with high intensity chemotherapy vs. lower intensity targeted therapy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1017194. [PMID: 36263213 PMCID: PMC9574198 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1017194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
The United States Food and Drug Administration has approved several oral, targeted therapies for the treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in recent years. These agents are approved in patients with relapsed/refractory disease or as frontline therapy in patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy based on age, performance status, or comorbidities. They are also being increasingly utilized frontline in patients of all ages and fitness levels through clinical trials and off label prescribing, but comparative treatment outcomes associated with intensive versus targeted therapy have not been extensively studied. We conducted a single center, retrospective analysis to address the impact of treatment intensity on survival in patients with AML aged 60-75 at diagnosis. This study included 127 patients, 73 of whom received high intensity chemotherapy at any point during treatment (any HiC) and 54 of whom received only low intensity targeted therapy (LITT only). Overall survival (OS) from treatment initiation did not differ significantly between the any HiC and LITT only groups (hazard ratio (HR) for death, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.09; P=0.11). The only three variables that were independently associated with superior OS were lower European Leukemia Net (ELN) risk classification, TP53 unmutated status, and receipt of transplant. Our data suggest that baseline genomic features and receipt of transplant are more important than treatment intensity in predicting survival in this patient population. They also highlight the vital role of transplant in older patients with AML regardless of treatment intensity utilized for remission induction. Larger studies are needed to further address this question, including prospective randomized trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kieran Sahasrabudhe
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Ying Huang
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Melanie Rebechi
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Patrick Elder
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Alice Mims
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Sarah Wall
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
- *Correspondence: Sarah Wall,
| |
Collapse
|