Pre-operative cellular dissociation grading in biopsies is highly predictive of post-operative tumour stage and patient outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Tumor-stroma contact ratio - a novel predictive factor for tumor response to chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer

The growth pattern of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) varies from compact tumor cell aggregates to diffusely infiltrating tumor cell-clusters. The influence of the growth pattern on local tumor control and survival has been studied mainly for surgically treated oral cavity carcinomas on a visual basis. In this study, we used multiplex immunofluorescence staining (mIF) to examine the antigens pan-cytokeratin, p16INK4a, Ki67, CD271, PD-L1, and CD8 in pretherapeutic biopsies from 86 OPSCC. We introduce Tumor-stroma contact ratio (TSC), a novel parameter, to quantify the relationship between tumor cells in contact with the stromal surface and the total number of epithelial tumor cells. mIF tumor cores were analyzed at the single-cell level, and tumor-stromal contact area was quantified using the R package "Spatstat". TSC was correlated with the visually assessed invasion pattern by two independent investigators. Furthermore, TSC was analyzed in relation to clinical parameters and patient survival data to evaluate its potential prognostic significance. Higher TSC correlated with poor response to (chemo-)radiotherapy (r = 0.3, p < 0.01), and shorter overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival (median OS: 13 vs 136 months, p < 0.0001; median PFS: 5 vs 85 months, p < 0.0001). Visual categorization of growth pattern according to established criteria of tumor aggressiveness showed interobserver variability increasing with more nuanced categories (2 categories: k = 0.7, 95 %-CI: 0.55 - 0.85; 4 categories k = 0.48, 95 %-CI: 0.35 - 0.61). In conclusion, TSC is an objective and reproducible computer-based parameter to quantify tumor-stroma contact area. We demonstrate its relevance for the response of oropharyngeal carcinomas to primary (chemo-)radiotherapy.

Multicenter Study on Tumor Budding in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Comparison Between Biopsy and Resection With Interobserver Variability Assessment

Grading lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) is controversial and not universally accepted. The histomorphologic feature of tumor budding (TB) is an established independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer, and its importance is growing in other solid cancers, making it a candidate for inclusion in tumor grading schemes. We aimed to compare TB between preoperative biopsies and resection specimens in pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma and assess interobserver variability. A retrospective cohort of 249 consecutive patients primarily resected with LUSC in Bern (2000-2013, n = 136) and Lausanne (2005-2020, n = 113) with available preoperative biopsies was analyzed for TB and additional histomorphologic parameters, such as spread through airspaces and desmoplasia, by 2 expert pathologists (M.M., C.N.). Results were correlated with clinicopathologic parameters and survival. In resection specimens, peritumoral budding (PTB) score was low (0-4 buds/0.785 mm2) in 47.6%, intermediate (5-9 buds/0.785 mm2) in 27.4%, and high (≥10 buds/0.785 mm2) in 25% of cases (median bud count, 5; IQR, 0-26). Both the absolute number of buds and TB score were similar when comparing tumor edge and intratumoral zone (P = .192) but significantly different from the score obtained in the biopsy (P < .001). Interobserver variability was moderate, regardless of score location (Cohen kappa, 0.59). The discrepant cases were reassessed, and consensus was reached in all cases with identification of causes of discordance. TB score was significantly associated with stage (P = .002), presence of lymph node (P = .033), and distant metastases (P = .020), without significant correlation with overall survival, tumor size, or pleural invasion. Desmoplasia was significantly associated with higher PTB (P < .001). Spread through airspaces was present in 34% and associated with lower PTB (P < .001). To conclude, despite confirming TB as a reproducible factor in LUSC, we disclose areas of scoring ambiguity. Preoperative biopsy evaluation was insufficient in establishing the final TB score of the resected tumor.

Prognostic Significance of Intratumoral and Peritumoral Budding in Distal Extrahepatic Bile Duct Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Although tumor budding (TB) has been recognized as a representative adverse prognosticator in gastrointestinal malignancies, it is not well elucidated in distal extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma (DBDC). Herein, we investigated the prognostic significance of peritumoral (PTB) and intratumoral (ITB) budding according to the modified DBDC staging of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer.

METHODS

PTB and ITB were independently evaluated in a cohort of DBDC patients (n = 410) based on the 2016 International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference.

RESULTS

High levels of PTB (PTBHigh, ≥ grade-2) and ITB (ITBHigh, ≥ grade-3) were identified in 316 (77%) and 238 (58%) cases, respectively. In univariate analysis, PTBHigh and ITBHigh, larger size and sclerosing tumor growth pattern, higher histologic grade, extrapancreatic location, adenocarcinomas unrelated to intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct, pancreatic, duodenal, and lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, cancer involvement of the bile duct resection margin, nodal metastasis, and higher T and N categories and disease stages were associated with shorter patient overall survival (OS) times. In multivariate analysis, PTBHigh and ITBHigh remained poor independent prognostic indicators of OS in DBDC patients. Specifically, ITBHigh could predict poor prognosis in patients with stage I (T1N0) DBDC.

CONCLUSIONS

Both PTBHigh and ITBHigh were strong prognostic indicators in patients with DBDC. Thus, ITB could be used to predict worse prognoses in patients with DBDC, in which PTB is difficult to assess, especially for patients with stage I (T1N0) DBDC.

Evaluation of the Cellular Dissociation Grading, Based on Tumor Budding and Cell Nest Size, in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis

The "Cellular Dissociation Grade" (CDG) is based on tumor cell budding and cell nest size. Many studies have examined the CDG in squamous cell carcinomas of other organs such as the lungs, oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, cervix and esophagus. In this study, the CDG was examined in 109 cases of invasive penile squamous cell carcinoma that were treated at the University Medicine Rostock between 2014 and 2022. Furthermore, its correlation with the pathologic status of regional lymph nodes (pN) as the main prognostic factor was verified. Finally, cellular dissociation grading was compared with classic WHO grading. The results showed that pN in penile squamous cell carcinoma showed a highly significant association with the CDG and no statistically significant association with WHO grading. These results support the notion that cellular dissociation grading is an important prognostic factor for squamous cell carcinoma.

Cellular dissociation grading on biopsies of pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma provides prognostic information across all stages and is congruent with resection specimen grading

Grading of squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) based on tumour budding and cell nest size has been termed cellular dissociation grading (CDG) and was suggested as a robust outcome predictor when assessed in biopsies and resections of various extrapulmonary SCCs. In pulmonary SCC (pSCC), this has so far been shown only for resected cancers. As most lung cancers are inoperable, it is of utmost importance to clarify whether the prognostic impact of CDG is retained in the biopsy setting. Two independent pSCC biopsy cohorts from Munich (n = 134, non-resected) and Heidelberg (n = 135, resected) were assessed. Tumour budding and cell nest size measures were assembled into the three-tiered CDG system (G1-G3). Data were correlated with clinicopathological parameters and overall- (OS), disease-specific- (DSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Interobserver variability and concordance between biopsy and resection specimen were also investigated. CDG was highly congruent between biopsy and resection specimens (κ = 0.77, p < 0.001). In both pSCC cohorts, biopsy-derived CDG strongly impacted on OS, DSS, and DFS (e.g. DFS: p < 0.001). In multivariate survival analyses, CDG remained a stage independent predictor of survival in both cohorts (DFS: p < 0.001 respectively; hazard ratio Munich cohort: CDG-G2: 4.31, CDG-G3; 5.14; Heidelberg cohort: CDG-G2: 5.87, CDG-G3: 9.07). Interobserver agreement for CDG was almost perfect (κ = 0.84, p < 0.001). We conclude that assessment of CDG based on tumour budding and cell nest size is feasible on pSCC biopsies and harbours stage independent prognostic information in resectable as well as non-resectable pSCC. Integration of this grading approach into clinicopathological routine should be considered.

Shooting at Moving and Hidden Targets-Tumour Cell Plasticity and the Notch Signalling Pathway in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) is often aggressive, with poor response to current therapies in approximately 40-50% of the patients. Current therapies are restricted to operation and irradiation, often combined with a small number of standard-of-care chemotherapeutic drugs, preferentially for advanced tumour patients. Only very recently, newer targeted therapies have entered the clinics, including Cetuximab, which targets the EGF receptor (EGFR), and several immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the immune receptor PD-1 and its ligand PD-L1. HNSCC tumour tissues are characterized by a high degree of intra-tumour heterogeneity (ITH), and non-genetic alterations that may affect both non-transformed cells, such as cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and transformed carcinoma cells. This very high degree of heterogeneity likely contributes to acquired drug resistance, tumour dormancy, relapse, and distant or lymph node metastasis. ITH, in turn, is likely promoted by pronounced tumour cell plasticity, which manifests in highly dynamic and reversible phenomena such as of partial or hybrid forms of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and enhanced tumour stemness. Stemness and tumour cell plasticity are strongly promoted by Notch signalling, which remains poorly understood especially in HNSCC. Here, we aim to elucidate how Notch signal may act both as a tumour suppressor and proto-oncogenic, probably during different stages of tumour cell initiation and progression. Notch signalling also interacts with numerous other signalling pathways, that may also have a decisive impact on tumour cell plasticity, acquired radio/chemoresistance, and metastatic progression of HNSCC. We outline the current stage of research related to Notch signalling, and how this pathway may be intricately interconnected with other, druggable targets and signalling mechanisms in HNSCC.

Qualitative and Quantitative Diagnosis in Head and Neck Cancer

The diagnosis is the art of determining the nature of a disease, and an accurate diagnosis is the true cornerstone on which rational treatment should be built. Within the workflow in the management of head and neck tumours, there are different types of diagnosis. The purpose of this work is to point out the differences and the aims of the different types of diagnoses and to highlight their importance in the management of patients with head and neck tumours. Qualitative diagnosis is performed by a pathologist and is essential in determining the management and can provide guidance on prognosis. The evolution of immunohistochemistry and molecular biology techniques has made it possible to obtain more precise diagnoses and to identify prognostic markers and precision factors. Quantitative diagnosis is made by the radiologist and consists of identifying a mass lesion and the estimation of the tumour volume and extent using imaging techniques, such as CT, MRI, and PET. The distinction between the two types of diagnosis is clear, as the methodology is different. The accurate establishment of both diagnoses plays an essential role in treatment planning. Getting the right diagnosis is a key aspect of health care, and it provides an explanation of a patient’s health problem and informs subsequent decision. Deep learning and radiomics approaches hold promise for improving diagnosis.

Tumour budding and CD8+ T cells: 'attackers' and 'defenders' in rectal cancer with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

AIM

Tumour budding ('attacker') and CD8⁺ T cells ('defender') are recognised as important parameters for risk stratification in colon cancers and, combined, may have an even stronger clinical impact. Here, we determine the value of tumour budding and CD8⁺ in rectal cancer patients treated with/without neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using digital scans of all tumour slides/case, we analysed CD8⁺ T cell counts in two patient cohorts: 45 neoadjuvantly treated and 47 primarily surgically treated (totalling n = 543 slides) after double-staining of the surgical resection specimen for pan-cytokeratin and CD8⁺ . Tumour buds in hot-spots were manually counted (area = 0.785 mm² ) and CD8⁺ T cell counts were analysed separately both in tumour budding hot-spots and the densest CD8⁺ regions throughout the tumour. In neoadjuvantly treated patients, only tumour budding and not CD8⁺ T cells was associated with tumour features, including more advanced ypT (P = 0.0062), venous invasion (P = 0.002), lymphatic invasion (P = 0.0003) and perineural invasion (P = 0.0017), as well as higher American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumour regression score (P = 0.0035), indicating less tumour response. Overall survival was also worse in patients with high-grade budding in univariate analysis only. In contrast, all three variables, namely tumour budding (P = 0.0347), CD8⁺ T cells in budding hot-spots (P = 0.0382) and CD8⁺ T cells in the densest areas (P = 0.0117) were also associated with worse (budding) and better (CD8) survival time in the multivariate setting.

CONCLUSION

In rectal cancer, tumour budding has clinical relevance in both primarily surgically treated patients and in those with neoadjuvantly treated patients, where it characterises highly aggressive residual disease. CD8⁺ T cell counts appear not to have prognostic relevance in the neoadjuvant context.

Biopsy quality is essential for preoperative prognostication in oral tongue cancer

A role for incisional biopsy in preoperative prognostication is increasingly being advocated in oral tongue squamous cell carcinomas (OTSCC). Biopsies at two locations were compared, and prognostic factors in biopsies and their corresponding resections were evaluated. A total of 138 OTSCC biopsy slides from Finland and Saudi Arabia were compared for size (horizontal and vertical) and invasive front. The Finnish cases were assessed for tumor stroma ratio (TSR) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) using light microscopy and digital image analysis assessment and compared. Furthermore, TSR, TILs, and previously analyzed budding and depth of invasion (BD) score in biopsies were compared with their evaluation in the corresponding resections. Fifty-nine percent of Finnish and 42% of Saudi Arabian biopsies were ≥ 5 mm deep, while 98% of Saudi Arabian and 76% of Finnish biopsies were ≥ 5 mm wide. Assessment of invasion front was possible in 72% of Finnish in comparison with 40% of Saudi Arabian biopsies. There was 86.8% agreement between TSR and 75% agreement between TIL evaluation using light microscopy and digital assessment. Significant agreement was obtained on comparing the TSR (p = 0.04) and BD (p < 0.001) values in biopsies and resections. Biopsies of ≥ 5 mm depth from representative OTSCC areas are essential for prognostic information. Clinical pathologists are advised to assess BD score and TSR for prognostic features in such biopsies.

Tumour budding in solid cancers

Tumour budding is an emerging prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC) and other solid cancers. Tumour buds are usually defined as isolated single cancer cells or clusters of up to four cancer cells located at the invasive tumour front. The prognostic value of tumour budding is now supported by a large body of evidence, whereas the utility of this phenotype as a predictive biomarker remains under investigation. The application of tumour budding indices in clinical practice requires a standardized scoring system that can be tailored to specific tumour types and clinical scenarios. In the context of CRC, tumour budding can be assessed according to the method agreed at the International Tumour Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) in 2016. Using the ITBCC scoring system, tumour budding is an independent predictor of lymph node metastasis in patients with pT1 CRC and of unfavourable survival in patients with stage II colon cancer. Regardless of the clinical scenario or tumour type, the assertion that 'the more tumour buds, the worse the clinical outcome' applies. In this Review, we provide an overview of tumour budding in solid cancers, highlighting the molecular and biological aspects of this phenomenon, including its associations with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and features of the tumour microenvironment. We also describe the available evidence demonstrating the value of tumour budding as a biomarker across various solid cancers.